My Life — Volume 1

Richard Wagner

⏱ 15 hr 23 min read50,152 downloads on Project Gutenberg

About This Book

Wagner dictating his life to his wife, stopping before his greatest successes — the most self-serving memoir in music.

Composed at King Ludwig II's request and dictated to Cosima, it covers his birth to 1864 and omits, softens, or reframes nearly everything inconvenient: debts, affairs, the politics, the treatment of friends. Volume one takes him through early struggle and exile. Read as a primary source that must be checked against everything else, and as a case study in how an artist builds his own myth.

Self-mythologizingExile and early struggleMemoir as unreliable source

Discussion Questions

  • What does Wagner choose to omit, and what does the pattern of omission reveal?
  • Does dictating to his wife shape what he was willing to admit?
Title Page & Table of Contents

My Life

by Richard Wagner

IN TWO VOLUMES

Volume 1

AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION FROM THE GERMAN

Contents

PREFACE

CONTENTS

MY LIFE

PART I. 1813-1842

PART II. 1842-1850 (Dresden)

PREFACE

The contents of these volumes have been written down directly from my

dictation, over a period of several years, by my friend and wife, who

wished me to tell her the story of my life. It was the desire of both

of us that these details of my life should be accessible to our family

and to our sincere and trusted friends; and we decided therefore, in

order to provide against a possible destruction of the one manuscript,

to have a small number of copies printed at our own expense. As the

value of this autobiography consists in its unadorned veracity, which,

under the circumstances, is its only justification, therefore my

statements had to be accompanied by precise names and dates; hence

there could be no question of their publication until some time after

my death, should interest in them still survive in our descendants, and

on that point I intend leaving directions in my will.

If, on the other hand, we do not refuse certain intimate friends a

sight of these papers now, it is that, relying on their genuine

interest in the contents, we are confident that they will not pass on

their knowledge to any who do not share their feelings in the matter.

Richard Wagner

CONTENTS

Part I. 1813-1842

Childhood and Schooldays Musical Studies Travels in Germany (First

Marriage) Paris: 1839-42

Part II. 1842-1850 (Dresden)

‘Rienzi’ ‘The Flying Dutchman’ Liszt, Spontini, Marschner, etc.

‘Tannhäuser’ Franck, Schumann, Semper, Gutzkow, Auerbach ‘Lohengrin’

(Libretto) Ninth Symphony Spohr, Gluck, Hiller, Devrient Official

Position. Studies in Historical Literature ‘Rienzi’ at Berlin

Relations with the Management, Mother’s Death, etc. Growing Sympathy

with Political Events, Bakunin The May Insurrection Flight: Weimar,

Zürich, Paris, Bordeaux, Geneva, Zürich

ILLUSTRATIONS

FRONTISPIECE FOR VOLUME I

Illustration: Richard Wagner in 1842,

from the Portrait by E. Kietz.

FRONTISPIECE FOR VOLUME II

Richard Wagner about 1872 by Lenbach.

Original in the possession of Frau Cosima Wagner These frontispieces

are used by the courtesy of Mr. F. Bruckmann.

MY LIFE

PART I

1813-1842

I was born at Leipzig on the 22nd of May 1813, in a room on the second

floor of the ‘Red and White Lion,’ and two days later was baptized at

St. Thomas’s Church, and christened Wilhelm Richard.

My father, Friedrich Wagner, was at the time of my birth a clerk in the

police service at Leipzig, and hoped to get the post of Chief Constable

in that town, but he died in the October of that same year. His death

was partly due to the great exertions imposed upon him by the stress of

police work during the war troubles and the battle of Leipzig, and

partly to the fact that he fell a victim to the nervous fever which was

raging at that time. As regards his father’s position in life, I learnt

later that he had held a small civil appointment as toll collector at

the Ranstädt Gate, but had distinguished himself from those in the same

station by giving his two sons a superior education, my father,

Friedrich, studying law, and the younger son, Adolph, theology.

My uncle subsequently exercised no small influence on my development;

we shall meet him again at a critical turning-point in the story of my

youth.

My father, whom I had lost so early, was, as I discovered afterwards, a

great lover of poetry and literature in general, and possessed in

particular an almost passionate affection for the drama, which was at

that time much in vogue among the educated classes. My mother told me,

among other things, that he took her to Lauchstadt for the first

performance of the _Braut von Messina_, and that on the promenade he

pointed out Schiller and Goethe to her, and reproved her warmly for

never having heard of these great men. He is said to have been not

altogether free from a gallant interest in actresses. My mother used to

complain jokingly that she often had to keep lunch waiting for him

while he was paying court to a certain famous actress of the day.[1]

When she scolded him, he vowed that he had been delayed by papers that

had to be attended to, and as a proof of his assertion pointed to his

fingers, which were supposed to be stained with ink, but on closer

inspection were found to be quite clean. His great fondness for the

theatre was further shown by his choice of the actor, Ludwig Geyer, as

one of his intimate friends. Although his choice of this friend was no

doubt mainly due to his love for the theatre, he at the same time

introduced into his family the noblest of benefactors; for this modest

artist, prompted by a warm interest in the lot of his friend’s large

family, so unexpectedly left destitute, devoted the remainder of his

life to making strenuous efforts to maintain and educate the orphans.

Even when the police official was spending his evenings at the theatre,

the worthy actor generally filled his place in the family circle, and

it seems had frequently to appease my mother, who, rightly or wrongly,

complained of the frivolity of her husband.

[1] Madame Hartwig.

How deeply the homeless artist, hard pressed by life and tossed to and

fro, longed to feel himself at home in a sympathetic family circle, was

proved by the fact that a year after his friend’s death he married his

widow, and from that time forward became a most loving father to the

seven children that had been left behind.

In this onerous undertaking he was favoured by an unexpected

improvement in his position, for he obtained a remunerative,

respectable, and permanent engagement, as a character actor, at the

newly established Court Theatre in Dresden. His talent for painting,

which had already helped him to earn a livelihood when forced by

extreme poverty to break off his university studies, again stood him in

good stead in his position at Dresden. True, he complained even more

than his critics that he had been kept from a regular and systematic

study of this art, yet his extraordinary aptitude, for portrait

painting in particular, secured him such important commissions that he

unfortunately exhausted his strength prematurely by his twofold

exertions as painter and actor. Once, when he was invited to Munich to

fulfil a temporary engagement at the Court Theatre, he received,

through the distinguished recommendation of the Saxon Court, such

pressing commissions from the Bavarian Court for portraits of the royal

family that he thought it wise to cancel his contract altogether. He

also had a turn for poetry. Besides fragments—often in very dainty

verse—he wrote several comedies, one of which, _Der Bethlehemitische

Kindermord_, in rhymed Alexandrines, was often performed; it was

published and received the warmest praise from Goethe.

This excellent man, under whose care our family moved to Dresden when I

was two years old, and by whom my mother had another daughter, Cecilia,

now also took my education in hand with the greatest care and

affection. He wished to adopt me altogether, and accordingly, when I

was sent to my first school, he gave me his own name, so that till the

age of fourteen I was known to my Dresden schoolfellows as Richard

Geyer; and it was not until some years after my stepfather’s death, and

on my family’s return to Leipzig, the home of my own kith and kin, that

I resumed the name of Wagner.

The earliest recollections of my childhood are associated with my

stepfather, and passed from him to the theatre. I well remember that he

would have liked to see me develop a talent for painting; and his

studio, with the easel and the pictures upon it, did not fail to

impress me. I remember in particular that I tried, with a childish love

of imitation, to copy a portrait of King Frederick Augustus of Saxony;

but when this simple daubing had to give place to a serious study of

drawing, I could not stand it, possibly because I was discouraged by

the pedantic technique of my teacher, a cousin of mine, who was rather

a bore. At one time during my early boyhood I became so weak after some

childish ailment that my mother told me later she used almost to wish

me dead, for it seemed as though I should never get well. However, my

subsequent good health apparently astonished my parents. I afterwards

learnt the noble part played by my excellent stepfather on this

occasion also; he never gave way to despair, in spite of the cares and

troubles of so large a family, but remained patient throughout, and

never lost the hope of pulling me through safely.

My imagination at this time was deeply impressed by my acquaintance

with the theatre, with which I was brought into contact, not only as a

childish spectator from the mysterious stagebox, with its access to the

stage, and by visits to the wardrobe with its fantastic costumes, wigs

and other disguises, but also by taking a part in the performances

myself. After I had been filled with fear by seeing my father play the

villain’s part in such tragedies as _Die Waise und der Mörder, Die

beiden Galeerensklaven_, I occasionally took part in comedy. I remember

that I appeared in _Der Weinberg an der Elbe_, a piece specially

written to welcome the King of Saxony on his return from captivity,

with music by the conductor, C. M. von Weber. In this I figured in a

_tableau vivant_ as an angel, sewn up in tights with wings on my back,

in a graceful pose which I had laboriously practised. I also remember

on this occasion being given a big iced cake, which I was assured the

King had intended for me personally. Lastly, I can recall taking a

child’s part in which I had a few words to speak in Kotzebue’s

_Menschenhass und Reue_[2], which furnished me with an excuse at school

for not having learnt my lessons. I said I had too much to do, as I had

to learn by heart an important part in _Den Menschen ausser der

Reihe_.[3]

[2] ‘Misanthropy and Remorse.’

[3] ‘The Man out of the Rank or Row.’ In the German this is a simple

phonetic corruption of Kotzebue’s title, which might easily occur to a

child who had only heard, and not read, that title.—EDITOR.

On the other hand, to show how seriously my father regarded my

education, when I was six years old he took me to a clergyman in the

country at Possendorf, near Dresden, where I was to be given a sound

and healthy training with other boys of my own class. In the evening,

the vicar, whose name was Wetzel, used to tell us the story of Robinson

Crusoe, and discuss it with us in a highly instructive manner. I was,

moreover, much impressed by a biography of Mozart which was read aloud;

and the newspaper accounts and monthly reports of the events of the

Greek War of Independence stirred my imagination deeply. My love for

Greece, which afterwards made me turn with enthusiasm to the mythology

and history of ancient Hellas, was thus the natural outcome of the

intense and painful interest I took in the events of this period. In

after years the story of the struggle of the Greeks against the

Persians always revived my impressions of this modern revolt of Greece

against the Turks.

One day, when I had been in this country home scarcely a year, a

messenger came from town to ask the vicar to take me to my parents’

house in Dresden, as my father was dying.

We did the three hours’ journey on foot; and as I was very exhausted

when I arrived, I scarcely understood why my mother was crying. The

next day I was taken to my father’s bedside; the extreme weakness with

which he spoke to me, combined with all the precautions taken in the

last desperate treatment of his complaint—acute hydrothorax—made the

whole scene appear like a dream to me, and I think I was too frightened

and surprised to cry.

In the next room my mother asked me to show her what I could play on

the piano, wisely hoping to divert my father’s thoughts by the sound. I

played Ueb’ immer Treu und Redlichkeit, and my father said to her, ‘Is

it possible he has musical talent?’

In the early hours of the next morning my mother came into the great

night nursery, and, standing by the bedside of each of us in turn, told

us, with sobs, that our father was dead, and gave us each a message

with his blessing. To me she said, ‘He hoped to make something of you.’

In the afternoon my schoolmaster, Wetzel, came to take me back to the

country. We walked the whole way to Possendorf, arriving at nightfall.

On the way I asked him many questions about the stars, of which he gave

me my first intelligent idea.

A week later my stepfather’s brother arrived from Eisleben for the

funeral. He promised, as far as he was able, to support the family,

which was now once more destitute, and undertook to provide for my

future education.

I took leave of my companions and of the kind-hearted clergyman, and it

was for his funeral that I paid my next visit to Possendorf a few years

later. I did not go to the place again till long afterwards, when I

visited it on an excursion such as I often made, far into the country,

at the time when I was conducting the orchestra in Dresden. I was much

grieved not to find the old parsonage still there, but in its place a

more pretentious modern structure, which so turned me against the

locality, that thenceforward my excursions were always made in another

direction.

This time my uncle brought me back to Dresden in the carriage. I found

my mother and sister in the deepest mourning, and remember being

received for the first time with a tenderness not usual in our family;

and I noticed that the same tenderness marked our leave-taking, when, a

few days later, my uncle took me with him to Eisleben.

This uncle, who was a younger brother of my stepfather, had settled

there as a goldsmith, and Julius, one of my elder brothers, had already

been apprenticed to him. Our old grandmother also lived with this

bachelor son, and as it was evident that she could not live long, she

was not informed of the death of her eldest son, which I, too, was

bidden to keep to myself. The servant carefully removed the crape from

my coat, telling me she would keep it until my grandmother died, which

was likely to be soon.

I was now often called upon to tell her about my father, and it was no

great difficulty for me to keep the secret of his death, as I had

scarcely realised it myself. She lived in a dark back room looking out

upon a narrow courtyard, and took a great delight in watching the

robins that fluttered freely about her, and for which she always kept

fresh green boughs by the stove. When some of these robins were killed

by the cat, I managed to catch others for her in the neighbourhood,

which pleased her very much, and, in return, she kept me tidy and

clean. Her death, as had been expected, took place before long, and the

crape that had been put away was now openly worn in Eisleben.

The back room, with its robins and green branches, now knew me no more,

but I soon made myself at home with a soap-boiler’s family, to whom the

house belonged, and became popular with them on account of the stories

I told them.

I was sent to a private school kept by a man called Weiss, who left an

impression of gravity and dignity upon my mind.

Towards the end of the fifties I was greatly moved at reading in a

musical paper the account of a concert at Eisleben, consisting of parts

of Tannhäuser, at which my former master, who had not forgotten his

young pupil, had been present.

The little old town with Luther’s house, and the numberless memorials

it contained of his stay there, has often, in later days, come back to

me in dreams. I have always wished to revisit it and verify the

clearness of my recollections, but, strange to say, it has never been

my fate to do so. We lived in the market-place, where I was often

entertained by strange sights, such, for instance, as performances by a

troupe of acrobats, in which a man walked a rope stretched from tower

to tower across the square, an achievement which long inspired me with

a passion for such feats of daring. Indeed, I got so far as to walk a

rope fairly easily myself with the help of a balancing-pole. I had made

the rope out of cords twisted together and stretched across the

courtyard, and even now I still feel a desire to gratify my acrobatic

instincts. The thing that attracted me most, however, was the brass

band of a Hussar regiment quartered at Eisleben. It often played a

certain piece which had just come out, and which was making a great

sensation, I mean the ‘Huntsmen’s Chorus’ out of the Freischutz, that

had been recently performed at the Opera in Berlin. My uncle and

brother asked me eagerly about its composer, Weber, whom I must have

seen at my parents’ house in Dresden, when he was conductor of the

orchestra there.

About the same time the Jungfernkranz was zealously played and sung by

some friends who lived near us. These two pieces cured me of my

weakness for the ‘Ypsilanti’ Waltz, which till that time I had regarded

as the most wonderful of compositions.

I have recollections of frequent tussles with the town boys, who were

constantly mocking at me for my ‘square’ cap; and I remember, too, that

I was very fond of rambles of adventure among the rocky banks of the

Unstrut.

My uncle’s marriage late in life, and the starting of his new home,

brought about a marked alteration in his relations to my family.

After a lapse of a year I was taken by him to Leipzig, and handed over

for some days to the Wagners, my own father’s relatives, consisting of

my uncle Adolph and his sister Friederike Wagner. This extraordinarily

interesting man, whose influence afterwards became ever more

stimulating to me, now for the first time brought himself and his

singular environment into my life.

He and my aunt were very close friends of Jeannette Thome, a queer old

maid who shared with them a large house in the market-place, in which,

if I am not mistaken, the Electoral family of Saxony had, ever since

the days of Augustus the Strong, hired and furnished the two principal

storeys for their own use whenever they were in Leipzig.

So far as I know, Jeannette Thome really owned the second storey, of

which she inhabited only a modest apartment looking out on the

courtyard. As, however, the King merely occupied the hired rooms for a

few days in the year, Jeannette and her circle generally made use of

his splendid apartments, and one of these staterooms was made into a

bedroom for me.

The decorations and fittings of these rooms also dated from the days of

Augustus the Strong. They were luxurious with heavy silk and rich

rococo furniture, all of which were much soiled with age. As a matter

of fact, I was delighted by these large strange rooms, looking out upon

the bustling Leipzig market-place, where I loved above all to watch the

students in the crowd making their way along in their old-fashioned

‘Club’ attire, and filling up the whole width of the street.

There was only one portion of the decorations of the rooms that I

thoroughly disliked, and this consisted of the various portraits, but

particularly those of high-born dames in hooped petticoats, with

youthful faces and powdered hair. These appeared to me exactly like

ghosts, who, when I was alone in the room, seemed to come back to life,

and filled me with the most abject fear. To sleep alone in this distant

chamber, in that old-fashioned bed of state, beneath those unearthly

pictures, was a constant terror to me. It is true I tried to hide my

fear from my aunt when she lighted me to bed in the evening with her

candle, but never a night passed in which I was not a prey to the most

horrible ghostly visions, my dread of which would leave me in a bath of

perspiration.

The personality of the three chief occupants of this storey was

admirably adapted to materialise the ghostly impressions of the house

into a reality that resembled some strange fairy-tale.

Jeannette Thome was very small and stout; she wore a fair Titus wig,

and seemed to hug to herself the consciousness of vanished beauty. My

aunt, her faithful friend and guardian, who was also an old maid, was

remarkable for the height and extreme leanness of her person. The

oddity of her otherwise very pleasant face was increased by an

exceedingly pointed chin.

My uncle Adolph had chosen as his permanent study a dark room in the

courtyard. There it was that I saw him for the first time, surrounded

by a great wilderness of books, and attired in an unpretentious indoor

costume, the most striking feature of which was a tall, pointed felt

cap, such as I had seen worn by the clown who belonged to the troupe of

rope-dancers at Eisleben. A great love of independence had driven him

to this strange retreat. He had been originally destined for the

Church, but he soon gave that up, in order to devote himself entirely

to philological studies. But as he had the greatest dislike of acting

as a professor and teacher in a regular post, he soon tried to make a

meagre livelihood by literary work. He had certain social gifts, and

especially a fine tenor voice, and appears in his youth to have been

welcome as a man of letters among a fairly wide circle of friends at

Leipzig.

On a trip to Jena, during which he and a companion seem to have found

their way into various musical and oratorical associations, he paid a

visit to Schiller. With this object in view, he had come armed with a

request from the management of the Leipzig Theatre, who wanted to

secure the rights of Wallenstein, which was just finished. He told me

later of the magic impression made upon him by Schiller, with his tall

slight figure and irresistibly attractive blue eyes. His only complaint

was that, owing to a well-meant trick played on him by his friend, he

had been placed in a most trying position; for the latter had managed

to send Schiller a small volume of Adolph Wagner’s poems in advance.

The young poet was much embarrassed to hear Schiller address him in

flattering terms on the subject of his poetry, but was convinced that

the great man was merely encouraging him out of kindness. Afterwards he

devoted himself entirely to philological studios—one of his best-known

publications in that department being his Parnasso Italiano, which he

dedicated to Goethe in an Italian poem. True, I have heard experts say

that the latter was written in unusually pompous Italian; but Goethe

sent him a letter full of praise, as well as a silver cup from his own

household plate. The impression that I, as a boy of eight, conceived of

Adolph Wagner, amid the surroundings of his own home, was that he was a

peculiarly puzzling character.

I soon had to leave the influence of this environment and was brought

back to my people at Dresden. Meanwhile my family, under the guidance

of my bereaved mother, had been obliged to settle down as well as they

could under the circumstances. My eldest brother Albert, who originally

intended to study medicine, had, upon the advice of Weber, who had much

admired his beautiful tenor voice, started his theatrical career in

Breslau. My second sister Louisa soon followed his example, and became

an actress. My eldest sister Rosalie had obtained an excellent

engagement at the Dresden Court Theatre, and the younger members of the

family all looked up to her; for she was now the main support of our

poor sorrowing mother. My family still occupied the same comfortable

home which my father had made for them. Some of the spare rooms were

occasionally let to strangers, and Spohr was among those who at one

time lodged with us. Thanks to her great energy, and to help received

from various sources (among which the continued generosity of the

Court, out of respect to the memory of my late stepfather, must not be

forgotten), my mother managed so well in making both ends meet, that

even my education did not suffer.

After it had been decided that my sister Clara, owing to her

exceedingly beautiful voice, should also go on the stage, my mother

took the greatest care to prevent me from developing any taste whatever

for the theatre. She never ceased to reproach herself for having

consented to the theatrical career of my eldest brother, and as my

second brother showed no greater talents than those which were useful

to him as a goldsmith, it was now her chief desire to see some progress

made towards the fulfilment of the hopes and wishes of my step-father,

‘who hoped to make something of me.’ On the completion of my eighth

year I was sent to the Kreuz Grammar School in Dresden, where it was

hoped I would study! There I was placed at the bottom of the lowest

class, and started my education under the most unassuming auspices.

My mother noted with much interest the slightest signs I might show of

a growing love and ability for my work. She herself, though not highly

educated, always created a lasting impression on all who really learnt

to know her, and displayed a peculiar combination of practical domestic

efficiency and keen intellectual animation. She never gave one of her

children any definite information concerning her antecedents. She came

from Weissenfels, and admitted that her parents had been bakers[4]

there. Even in regard to her maiden name she always spoke with some

embarrassment, and intimated that it was ‘Perthes,’ though, as we

afterwards ascertained, it was in reality ‘Bertz.’ Strange to say, she

had been placed in a high-class boarding-school in Leipzig, where she

had enjoyed the advantage of the care and interest of one of ‘her

father’s influential friends,’ to whom she afterwards referred as being

a Weimar prince who had been very kind to her family in Weissenfels.

Her education in that establishment seems to have been interrupted on

account of the sudden death of this ‘friend.’ She became acquainted

with my father at a very early age, and married him in the first bloom

of her youth, he also being very young, though he already held an

appointment. Her chief characteristics seem to have been a keen sense

of humour and an amiable temper, so we need not suppose that it was

merely a sense of duty towards the family of a departed comrade that

afterwards induced the admirable Ludwig Geyer to enter into matrimony

with her when she was no longer youthful, but rather that he was

impelled to that step by a sincere and warm regard for the widow of his

friend. A portrait of her, painted by Geyer during the lifetime of my

father, gives one a very favourable impression of what she must have

been. Even from the time when my recollection of her is quite distinct,

she always had to wear a cap owing to some slight affection of the

head, so that I have no recollection of her as a young and pretty

mother. Her trying position at the head of a numerous family (of which

I was the seventh surviving member), the difficulty of obtaining the

wherewithal to rear them, and of keeping up appearances on very limited

resources, did not conduce to evolve that tender sweetness and

solicitude which are usually associated with motherhood. I hardly ever

recollect her having fondled me. Indeed, demonstrations of affection

were not common in our family, although a certain impetuous, almost

passionate and boisterous manner always characterised our dealings.

This being so, it naturally seemed to me quite a great event when one

night I, fretful with sleepiness, looked up at her with tearful eyes as

she was taking me to bed, and saw her gaze back at me proudly and

fondly, and speak of me to a visitor then present with a certain amount

of tenderness.

[4] According to more recent information—mill owners.

What struck me more particularly about her was the strange enthusiasm

and almost pathetic manner with which she spoke of the great and of the

beautiful in Art. Under this heading, however, she would never have let

me suppose that she included dramatic art, but only Poetry, Music, and

Painting. Consequently, she often even threatened me with her curse

should I ever express a desire to go on the stage. Moreover, she was

very religiously inclined. With intense fervour she would often give us

long sermons about God and the divine quality in man, during which, now

and again, suddenly lowering her voice in a rather funny way, she would

interrupt herself in order to rebuke one of us. After the death of our

stepfather she used to assemble us all round her bed every morning,

when one of us would read out a hymn or a part of the Church service

from the prayer-book before she took her coffee. Sometimes the choice

of the part to be read was hardly appropriate, as, for instance, when

my sister Clara on one occasion thoughtlessly read the ‘Prayer to be

said in time of War,’ and delivered it with so much expression that my

mother interrupted her, saying: ‘Oh, stop! Good gracious me! Things are

not quite so bad as that. There’s no war on at present!’

In spite of our limited means we had lively and—as they appeared to my

boyish imagination—even brilliant evening parties sometimes. After the

death of my stepfather, who, thanks to his success as a portrait

painter, in the later years of his life had raised his income to what

for those days was a really decent total, many agreeable acquaintances

of very good social position whom he had made during this flourishing

period still remained on friendly terms with us, and would occasionally

join us at our evening gatherings. Amongst those who came were the

members of the Court Theatre, who at that time gave very charming and

highly entertaining parties of their own, which, on my return to

Dresden later on, I found had been altogether given up.

Very delightful, too, were the picnics arranged between us and our

friends at some of the beautiful spots around Dresden, for these

excursions were always brightened by a certain artistic spirit and

general good cheer. I remember one such outing we arranged to

Loschwitz, where we made a kind of gypsy camp, in which Carl Maria von

Weber played his part in the character of cook. At home we also had

some music. My sister Rosalie played the piano, and Clara was beginning

to sing. Of the various theatrical performances we organised in those

early days, often after elaborate preparation, with the view of amusing

ourselves on the birthdays of our elders, I can hardly remember one,

save a parody on the romantic play of Sappho, by Grillparzer, in which

I took part as one of the singers in the crowd that preceded Phaon’s

triumphal car. I endeavoured to revive these memories by means of a

fine puppet show, which I found among the effects of my late

stepfather, and for which he himself had painted some beautiful

scenery. It was my intention to surprise my people by means of a

brilliant performance on this little stage. After I had very clumsily

made several puppets, and had provided them with a scanty wardrobe made

from cuttings of material purloined from my sisters, I started to

compose a chivalric drama, in which I proposed to rehearse my puppets.

When I had drafted the first scene, my sisters happened to discover the

MS. and literally laughed it to scorn, and, to my great annoyance, for

a long time afterwards they chaffed me by repeating one particular

sentence which I had put into the mouth of the heroine, and which

was—Ich hore schon den Ritter trapsen (‘I hear his knightly footsteps

falling’). I now returned with renewed ardour to the theatre, with

which, even at this time, my family was in close touch. Den Freischutz

in particular appealed very strongly to my imagination, mainly on

account of its ghostly theme. The emotions of terror and the dread of

ghosts formed quite an important factor in the development of my mind.

From my earliest childhood certain mysterious and uncanny things

exercised an enormous influence over me. If I were left alone in a room

for long, I remember that, when gazing at lifeless objects such as

pieces of furniture, and concentrating my attention upon them, I would

suddenly shriek out with fright, because they seemed to me alive. Even

during the latest years of my boyhood, not a night passed without my

waking out of some ghostly dream and uttering the most frightful

shrieks, which subsided only at the sound of some human voice. The most

severe rebuke or even chastisement seemed to me at those times no more

than a blessed release. None of my brothers or sisters would sleep

anywhere near me. They put me to sleep as far as possible away from the

others, without thinking that my cries for help would only be louder

and longer; but in the end they got used even to this nightly

disturbance.

In connection with this childish terror, what attracted me so strongly

to the theatre—by which I mean also the stage, the rooms behind the

scenes, and the dressing-rooms—was not so much the desire for

entertainment and amusement such as that which impels the present-day

theatre-goers, but the fascinating pleasure of finding myself in an

entirely different atmosphere, in a world that was purely fantastic and

often gruesomely attractive. Thus to me a scene, even a wing,

representing a bush, or some costume or characteristic part of it,

seemed to come from another world, to be in some way as attractive as

an apparition, and I felt that contact with it might serve as a lever

to lift me from the dull reality of daily routine to that delightful

region of spirits. Everything connected with a theatrical performance

had for me the charm of mystery, it both bewitched and fascinated me,

and while I was trying, with the help of a few playmates, to imitate

the performance of Der Freischutz, and to devote myself energetically

to reproducing the needful costumes and masks in my grotesque style of

painting, the more elegant contents of my sisters’ wardrobes, in the

beautifying of which I had often seen the family occupied, exercised a

subtle charm over my imagination; nay, my heart would beat madly at the

very touch of one of their dresses.

In spite of the fact that, as I already mentioned, our family was not

given to outward manifestations of affection, yet the fact that I was

brought up entirely among feminine surroundings must necessarily have

influenced the development of the sensitive side of my nature. Perhaps

it was precisely because my immediate circle was generally rough and

impetuous, that the opposite characteristics of womanhood, especially

such as were connected with the imaginary world of the theatre, created

a feeling of such tender longing in me.

Luckily these fantastic humours, merging from the gruesome into the

mawkish, were counteracted and balanced by more serious influences

undergone at school at the hands of my teachers and schoolfellows. Even

there, it was chiefly the weird that aroused my keenest interest. I can

hardly judge whether I had what would be called a good head for study.

I think that, in general, what I really liked I was soon able to grasp

without much effort, whereas I hardly exerted myself at all in the

study of subjects that were uncongenial. This characteristic was most

marked in regard to arithmetic and, later on, mathematics. In neither

of these subjects did I ever succeed in bringing my mind seriously to

bear upon the tasks that were set me. In the matter of the Classics,

too, I paid only just as much attention as was absolutely necessary to

enable me to get a grasp of them; for I was stimulated by the desire to

reproduce them to myself dramatically. In this way Greek particularly

attracted me, because the stories from Greek mythology so seized upon

my fancy that I tried to imagine their heroes as speaking to me in

their native tongue, so as to satisfy my longing for complete

familiarity with them. In these circumstances it will be readily

understood that the grammar of the language seemed to me merely a

tiresome obstacle, and by no means in itself an interesting branch of

knowledge.

The fact that my study of languages was never very thorough, perhaps

best explains the fact that I was afterwards so ready to cease

troubling about them altogether. Not until much later did this study

really begin to interest me again, and that was only when I learnt to

understand its physiological and philosophical side, as it was revealed

to our modern Germanists by the pioneer work of Jakob Grimm. Then, when

it was too late to apply myself thoroughly to a study which at last I

had learned to appreciate, I regretted that this newer conception of

the study of languages had not yet found acceptance in our colleges

when I was younger.

Nevertheless, by my successes in philological work I managed to attract

the attention of a young teacher at the Kreuz Grammar School, a Master

of Arts named Sillig, who proved very helpful to me. He often permitted

me to visit him and show him my work, consisting of metric translations

and a few original poems, and he always seemed very pleased with my

efforts in recitation. What he thought of me may best be judged perhaps

from the fact that he made me, as a boy of about twelve, recite not

only ‘Hector’s Farewell’ from the Iliad, but even Hamlet’s celebrated

monologue. On one occasion, when I was in the fourth form of the

school, one of my schoolfellows, a boy named Starke, suddenly fell

dead, and the tragic event aroused so much sympathy, that not only did

the whole school attend the funeral, but the headmaster also ordered

that a poem should be written in commemoration of the ceremony, and

that this poem should be published. Of the various poems submitted,

among which there was one by myself, prepared very hurriedly, none

seemed to the master worthy of the honour which he had promised, and he

therefore announced his intention of substituting one of his own

speeches in the place of our rejected attempts. Much distressed by this

decision, I quickly sought out Professor Sillig, with the view of

urging him to intervene on behalf of my poem. We thereupon went through

it together. Its well-constructed and well-rhymed verses, written in

stanzas of eight lines, determined him to revise the whole of it

carefully. Much of its imagery was bombastic, and far beyond the

conception of a boy of my age. I recollect that in one part I had drawn

extensively from the monologue in Addison’s Cato, spoken by Cato just

before his suicide. I had met with this passage in an English grammar,

and it had made a deep impression upon me. The words: ‘The stars shall

fade away, the sun himself grow dim with age, and nature sink in

years,’ which, at all events, were a direct plagiarism, made Sillig

laugh—a thing at which I was a little offended. However, I felt very

grateful to him, for, thanks to the care and rapidity with which he

cleared my poem of these extravagances, it was eventually accepted by

the headmaster, printed, and widely circulated.

The effect of this success was extraordinary, both on my schoolfellows

and on my own family. My mother devoutly folded her hands in

thankfulness, and in my own mind my vocation seemed quite a settled

thing. It was clear, beyond the possibility of a doubt, that I was

destined to be a poet. Professor Sillig wished me to compose a grand

epic, and suggested as a subject ‘The Battle of Parnassus,’ as

described by Pausanias. His reasons for this choice were based upon the

legend related by Pausanias, viz., that in the second century B.C. the

Muses from Parnassus aided the combined Greek armies against the

destructive invasion of the Gauls by provoking a panic among the

latter. I actually began my heroic poem in hexameter verse, but could

not get through the first canto.

Not being far enough advanced in the language to understand the Greek

tragedies thoroughly in the original, my own attempts to construct a

tragedy in the Greek form were greatly influenced by the fact that

quite by accident I came across August Apel’s clever imitation of this

style in his striking poems ‘Polyidos’ and ‘Aitolier.’ For my theme I

selected the death of Ulysses, from a fable of Hyginus, according to

which the aged hero is killed by his son, the offspring of his union

with Calypso. But I did not get very far with this work either, before

I gave it up.

My mind became so bent upon this sort of thing, that duller studies

naturally ceased to interest me. The mythology, legends, and, at last,

the history of Greece alone attracted me.

I was fond of life, merry with my companions, and always ready for a

joke or an adventure. Moreover, I was constantly forming friendships,

almost passionate in their ardour, with one or the other of my

comrades, and in choosing my associates I was mainly influenced by the

extent to which my new acquaintance appealed to my eccentric

imagination. At one time it would be poetising and versifying that

decided my choice of a friend; at another, theatrical enterprises,

while now and then it would be a longing for rambling and mischief.

Furthermore, when I reached my thirteenth year, a great change came

over our family affairs. My sister Rosalie, who had become the chief

support of our household, obtained an advantageous engagement at the

theatre in Prague, whither mother and children removed in 1820, thus

giving up the Dresden home altogether. I was left behind in Dresden, so

that I might continue to attend the Kreuz Grammar School until I was

ready to go up to the university. I was therefore sent to board and

lodge with a family named Bohme, whose sons I had known at school, and

in whose house I already felt quite at home. With my residence in this

somewhat rough, poor, and not particularly well-conducted family, my

years of dissipation began. I no longer enjoyed the quiet retirement

necessary for work, nor the gentle, spiritual influence of my sisters’

companionship. On the contrary, I was plunged into a busy, restless

life, full of rough horseplay and of quarrels. Nevertheless, it was

there that I began to experience the influence of the gentler sex in a

manner hitherto unknown to me, as the grown-up daughters of the family

and their friends often filled the scanty and narrow rooms of the

house. Indeed, my first recollections of boyish love date from this

period. I remember a very beautiful young girl, whose name, if I am not

mistaken, was Amalie Hoffmann, coming to call at the house one Sunday.

She was charmingly dressed, and her appearance as she came into the

room literally struck me dumb with amazement. On other occasions I

recollect pretending to be too helplessly sleepy to move, so that I

might be carried up to bed by the girls, that being, as they thought,

the only remedy for my condition. And I repeated this, because I found,

to my surprise, that their attention under these circumstances brought

me into closer and more gratifying proximity with them.

The most important event during this year of separation from my family

was, however, a short visit I paid to them in Prague. In the middle of

the winter my mother came to Dresden, and took me hack with her to

Prague for a week. Her way of travelling was quite unique. To the end

of her days she preferred the more dangerous mode of travelling in a

hackney carriage to the quicker journey by mail-coach, so that we spent

three whole days in the bitter cold on the road from Dresden to Prague.

The journey over the Bohemian mountains often seemed to be beset with

the greatest dangers, but happily we survived our thrilling adventures

and at last arrived in Prague, where I was suddenly plunged into

entirely new surroundings.

For a long time the thought of leaving Saxony on another visit to

Bohemia, and especially Prague, had had quite a romantic attraction for

me. The foreign nationality, the broken German of the people, the

peculiar headgear of the women, the native wines, the harp-girls and

musicians, and finally, the ever present signs of Catholicism, its

numerous chapels and shrines, all produced on me a strangely

exhilarating impression. This was probably due to my craze for

everything theatrical and spectacular, as distinguished from simple

bourgeois customs. Above all, the antique splendour and beauty of the

incomparable city of Prague became indelibly stamped on my fancy. Even

in my own family surroundings I found attractions to which I had

hitherto been a stranger. For instance, my sister Ottilie, only two

years older than myself, had won the devoted friendship of a noble

family, that of Count Pachta, two of whose daughters, Jenny and

Auguste, who had long been famed as the leading beauties of Prague, had

become fondly attached to her. To me, such people and such a connection

were something quite novel and enchanting. Besides these, certain beaux

esprits of Prague, among them W. Marsano, a strikingly handsome and

charming man, were frequent visitors at our house. They often earnestly

discussed the tales of Hoffmann, which at that date were comparatively

new, and had created some sensation. It was now that I made my first

though rather superficial acquaintance with this romantic visionary,

and so received a stimulus which influenced me for many years even to

the point of infatuation, and gave me very peculiar ideas of the world.

In the following spring, 1827, I repeated this journey from Dresden to

Prague, but this time on foot, and accompanied by my friend Rudolf

Bohme. Our tour was full of adventure. We got to within an hour of

Teplitz the first night, and next day we had to get a lift in a wagon,

as we had walked our feet sore; yet this only took us as far as

Lowositz, as our funds had quite run out. Under a scorching sun, hungry

and half-fainting, we wandered along bypaths through absolutely unknown

country, until at sundown we happened to reach the main road just as an

elegant travelling coach came in sight. I humbled my pride so far as to

pretend I was a travelling journeyman, and begged the distinguished

travellers for alms, while my friend timidly hid himself in the ditch

by the roadside. Luckily we decided to seek shelter for the night in an

inn, where we took counsel whether we should spend the alms just

received on a supper or a bed. We decided for the supper, proposing to

spend the night under the open sky. While we were refreshing ourselves,

a strange-looking wayfarer entered. He wore a black velvet skull-cap,

to which a metal lyre was attached like a cockade, and on his back he

bore a harp. Very cheerfully he set down his instrument, made himself

comfortable, and called for a good meal. He intended to stay the night,

and to continue his way next day to Prague, where he lived, and whither

he was returning from Hanover.

My good spirits and courage were stimulated by the jovial manners of

this merry fellow, who constantly repeated his favourite motto, ‘non

plus ultra.’ We soon struck up an acquaintance, and in return for my

confidence, the strolling player’s attitude to me was one of almost

touching sympathy. It was agreed that we should continue our journey

together next day on foot. He lent me two twenty-kreutzer pieces (about

ninepence), and allowed me to write my Prague address in his

pocket-book. I was highly delighted at this personal success. My

harpist grew extravagantly merry; a good deal of Czernosek wine was

drunk; he sang and played on his harp like a madman, continually

reiterating his ‘non plus ultra’ till at last, overcome with wine, he

fell down on the straw, which had been spread out on the floor for our

common bed. When the sun once more peeped in, we could not rouse him,

and we had to make up our minds to set off in the freshness of the

early morning without him, feeling convinced that the sturdy fellow

would overtake us during the day. But it was in vain that we looked out

for him on the road and during our subsequent stay in Prague. Indeed,

it was not until several weeks later that the extraordinary fellow

turned up at my mother’s, not so much to collect payment of his loan,

as to inquire about the welfare of the young friend to whom that loan

had been made.

The remainder of our journey was very fatiguing, and the joy I felt

when I at last beheld Prague from the summit of a hill, at about an

hour’s distance, simply beggars description. Approaching the suburbs,

we were for the second time met by a splendid carriage, from which my

sister Ottilie’s two lovely friends called out to me in astonishment.

They had recognised me immediately, in spite of my terribly sunburnt

face, blue linen blouse, and bright red cotton cap. Overwhelmed with

shame, and with my heart beating like mad, I could hardly utter a word,

and hurried away to my mother’s to attend at once to the restoration of

my sunburnt complexion. To this task I devoted two whole days, during

which I swathed my face in parsley poultices; and not till then did I

seek the pleasures of society. When, on the return journey, I looked

back once more on Prague from the same hilltop, I burst into tears,

flung myself on the earth, and for a long time could not be induced by

my astonished companion to pursue the journey. I was downcast for the

rest of the way, and we arrived home in Dresden without any further

adventures.

During the same year I again gratified my fancy for long excursions on

foot by joining a numerous company of grammar school boys, consisting

of pupils of several classes and of various ages, who had decided to

spend their summer holidays in a tour to Leipzig. This journey also

stands out among the memories of my youth, by reason of the strong

impressions it left behind. The characteristic feature of our party was

that we all aped the student, by behaving and dressing extravagantly in

the most approved student fashion. After going as far as Meissen on the

market-boat, our path lay off the main road, through villages with

which I was as yet unfamiliar. We spent the night in the vast barn of a

village inn, and our adventures were of the wildest description. There

we saw a large marionette show, with almost life-sized figures. Our

entire party settled themselves in the auditorium, where their presence

was a source of some anxiety to the managers, who had only reckoned on

an audience of peasants. Genovefa was the play given. The ceaseless

silly jests, and constant interpolations and jeering interruptions, in

which our corps of embryo-students indulged, finally aroused the anger

even of the peasants, who had come prepared to weep. I believe I was

the only one of our party who was pained by these impertinences, and in

spite of involuntary laughter at some of my comrades’ jokes, I not only

defended the play itself, but also its original, simple-minded

audience. A popular catch-phrase which occurred in the piece has ever

since remained stamped on my memory. ‘Golo’ instructs the inevitable

Kaspar that, when the Count Palatine returns home, he must ‘tickle him

behind, so that he should feel it in front’ (hinten zu kitzeln, dass er

es vorne fuhle). Kaspar conveys Golo’s order verbatim to the Count, and

the latter reproaches the unmasked rogue in the following terms,

uttered with the greatest pathos: ‘O Golo, Golo! thou hast told Kaspar

to tickle me behind, so that I shall feel it in front!’

From Grimma our party rode into Leipzig in open carriages, but not

until we had first carefully removed all the outward emblems of the

undergraduate, lest the local students we were likely to meet might

make us rue our presumption.

Since my first visit, when I was eight years old, I had only once

returned to Leipzig, and then for a very brief stay, and under

circumstances very similar to those of the earlier visit. I now renewed

my fantastic impressions of the Thome house, but this time, owing to my

more advanced education, I looked forward to more intelligent

intercourse with my uncle Adolph. An opening for this was soon provided

by my joyous astonishment on learning that a bookcase in the large

anteroom, containing a goodly collection of books, was my property,

having been left me by my father. I went through the books with my

uncle, selected at once a number of Latin authors in the handsome

Zweibruck edition, along with sundry attractive looking works of poetry

and belles-lettres, and arranged for them to be sent to Dresden. During

this visit I was very much interested in the life of the students. In

addition to my impressions of the theatre and of Prague, now came those

of the so-called swaggering undergraduate. A great change had taken

place in this class. When, as a lad of eight, I had my first glimpse of

students, their long hair, their old German costume with the black

velvet skull-cap and the shirt collar turned back from the bare neck,

had quite taken my fancy. But since that time the old student

‘associations’ which affected this fashion had disappeared in the face

of police prosecutions. On the other hand, the national student clubs,

no less peculiar to Germans, had become conspicuous. These clubs

adopted, more or less, the fashion of the day, but with some little

exaggeration. Albeit, their dress was clearly distinguishable from that

of other classes, owing to its picturesqueness, and especially its

display of the various club-colours. The ‘Comment,’ that compendium of

pedantic rules of conduct for the preservation of a defiant and

exclusive esprit de corps, as opposed to the bourgeois classes, had its

fantastic side, just as the most philistine peculiarities of the

Germans have, if you probe them deeply enough. To me it represented the

idea of emancipation from the yoke of school and family. The longing to

become a student coincided unfortunately with my growing dislike for

drier studies and with my ever-increasing fondness for cultivating

romantic poetry. The results of this soon showed themselves in my

resolute attempts to make a change.

At the time of my confirmation, at Easter, 1827, I had considerable

doubt about this ceremony, and I already felt a serious falling off of

my reverence for religious observances. The boy who, not many years

before, had gazed with agonised sympathy on the altarpiece in the Kreuz

Kirche (Church of the Holy Cross), and had yearned with ecstatic

fervour to hang upon the Cross in place of the Saviour, had now so far

lost his veneration for the clergyman, whose preparatory confirmation

classes he attended, as to be quite ready to make fun of him, and even

to join with his comrades in withholding part of his class fees, and

spending the money in sweets. How matters stood with me spiritually was

revealed to me, almost to my horror, at the Communion service, when I

walked in procession with my fellow-communicants to the altar to the

sound of organ and choir. The shudder with which I received the Bread

and Wine was so ineffaceably stamped on my memory, that I never again

partook of the Communion, lest I should do so with levity. To avoid

this was all the easier for me, seeing that among Protestants such

participation is not compulsory.

I soon, however, seized, or rather created, an opportunity of forcing a

breach with the Kreuz Grammar School, and thus compelled my family to

let me go to Leipzig. In self-defence against what I considered an

unjust punishment with which I was threatened by the assistant

headmaster, Baumgarten-Crusius, for whom I otherwise had great respect,

I asked to be discharged immediately from the school on the ground of

sudden summons to join my family in Leipzig. I had already left the

Bohme household three months before, and now lived alone in a small

garret, where I was waited on by the widow of a court plate-washer, who

at every meal served up the familiar thin Saxon coffee as almost my

sole nourishment. In this attic I did little else but write verses.

Here, too, I formed the first outlines of that stupendous tragedy which

afterwards filled my family with such consternation. The irregular

habits I acquired through this premature domestic independence induced

my anxious mother to consent very readily to my removal to Leipzig, the

more so as a part of our scattered family had already migrated there.

My longing for Leipzig, originally aroused by the fantastic impressions

I had gained there, and later by my enthusiasm for a student’s life,

had recently been still further stimulated. I had seen scarcely

anything of my sister Louisa, at that time a girl of about twenty-two,

as she had gone to the theatre of Breslau shortly after our

stepfather’s death. Quite recently she had been in Dresden for a few

days on her way to Leipzig, having accepted an engagement at the

theatre there. This meeting with my almost unknown sister, her hearty

manifestations of joy at seeing me again, as well as her sprightly,

merry disposition, quite won my heart. To live with her seemed an

alluring prospect, especially as my mother and Ottilie had joined her

for a while. For the first time a sister had treated me with some

tenderness. When at last I reached Leipzig at Christmas in the same

year (1827), and there found my mother with Ottilie and Cecilia (my

half-sister), I fancied myself in heaven. Great changes, however, had

already taken place. Louisa was betrothed to a respected and well-to-do

bookseller, Friedrich Brockhaus. This gathering together of the

relatives of the penniless bride-elect did not seem to trouble her

remarkably kind-hearted fiance. But my sister may have become uneasy on

the subject, for she soon gave me to understand that she was not taking

it quite in good part. Her desire to secure an entree into the higher

social circles of bourgeois life naturally produced a marked change in

her manner, at one time so full of fun, and of this I gradually became

so keenly sensible that finally we were estranged for a time. Moreover,

I unfortunately gave her good cause to reprove my conduct. After I got

to Leipzig I quite gave up my studies and all regular school work,

probably owing to the arbitrary and pedantic system in vogue at the

school there.

In Leipzig there were two higher-class schools, one called St. Thomas’s

School, and the other, and the more modern, St. Nicholas’s School. The

latter at that time enjoyed a better reputation than the former; so

there I had to go. But the council of teachers before whom I appeared

for my entrance examination at the New Year (1828) thought fit to

maintain the dignity of their school by placing me for a time in the

upper third form, whereas at the Kreuz Grammar School in Dresden I had

been in the second form. My disgust at having to lay aside my

Homer—from which I had already made written translations of twelve

songs—and take up the lighter Greek prose writers was indescribable. It

hurt my feelings so deeply, and so influenced my behaviour, that I

never made a friend of any teacher in the school. The unsympathetic

treatment I met with made me all the more obstinate, and various other

circumstances in my position only added to this feeling. While student

life, as I saw it day by day, inspired me ever more and more with its

rebellious spirit, I unexpectedly met with another cause for despising

the dry monotony of school regime. I refer to the influence of my

uncle, Adolph Wagner, which, though he was long unconscious of it, went

a long way towards moulding the growing stripling that I then was.

The fact that my romantic tastes were not based solely on a tendency to

superficial amusement was shown by my ardent attachment to this learned

relative. In his manner and conversation he was certainly very

attractive; the many-sidedness of his knowledge, which embraced not

only philology but also philosophy and general poetic literature,

rendered intercourse with him a most entertaining pastime, as all those

who knew him used to admit. On the other hand, the fact that he was

denied the gift of writing with equal charm, or clearness, was a

singular defect which seriously lessened his influence upon the

literary world, and, in fact, often made him appear ridiculous, as in a

written argument he would perpetrate the most pompous and involved

sentences. This weakness could not have alarmed me, because in the hazy

period of my youth the more incomprehensible any literary extravagance

was, the more I admired it; besides which, I had more experience of his

conversation than of his writings. He also seemed to find pleasure in

associating with the lad who could listen with so much heart and soul.

Yet unfortunately, possibly in the fervour of his discourses, of which

he was not a little proud, he forgot that their substance, as well as

their form, was far above my youthful powers of comprehension. I called

daily to accompany him on his constitutional walk beyond the city

gates, and I shrewdly suspect that we often provoked the smiles of

those passers-by who overheard the profound and often earnest

discussions between us. The subjects generally ranged over everything

serious or sublime throughout the whole realm of knowledge. I took the

most enthusiastic interest in his copious library, and tasted eagerly

of almost all branches of literature, without really grounding myself

in any one of them.

My uncle was delighted to find in me a very willing listener to his

recital of classic tragedies. He had made a translation of Oedipus,

and, according to his intimate friend Tieck, justly flattered himself

on being an excellent reader.

I remember once, when he was sitting at his desk reading out a Greek

tragedy to me, it did not annoy him when I fell fast asleep, and he

afterwards pretended he had not noticed it. I was also induced to spend

my evenings with him, owing to the friendly and genial hospitality his

wife showed me. A very great change had come over my uncle’s life since

my first acquaintance with him at Jeannette Thome’s. The home which he,

together with his sister Friederike, had found in his friend’s house

seemed, as time went on, to have brought in its train duties that were

irksome. As his literary work assured him a modest income, he

eventually deemed it more in accordance with his dignity to make a home

of his own. A friend of his, of the same age as himself, the sister of

the aesthete Wendt of Leipzig, who afterwards became famous, was chosen

by him to keep house for him. Without saying a word to Jeannette,

instead of going for his usual afternoon walk he went to the church

with his chosen bride, and got through the marriage ceremonies as

quickly as possible; and it was only on his return that he informed us

he was leaving, and would have his things removed that very day. He

managed to meet the consternation, perhaps also the reproaches, of his

elderly friend with quiet composure; and to the end of his life he

continued his regular daily visits to ‘Mam’selle Thome,’ who at times

would coyly pretend to sulk. It was only poor Friederike who seemed

obliged at times to atone for her brother’s sudden unfaithfulness.

What attracted me in my uncle most strongly was his blunt contempt of

the modern pedantry in State, Church, and School, to which he gave vent

with some humour. Despite the great moderation of his usual views on

life, he yet produced on me the effect of a thorough free-thinker. I

was highly delighted by his contempt for the pedantry of the schools.

Once, when I had come into serious conflict with all the teachers of

the Nicolai School, and the rector of the school had approached my

uncle, as the only male representative of my family, with a serious

complaint about my behaviour, my uncle asked me during a stroll round

the town, with a calm smile as though he were speaking to one of his

own age, what I had been up to with the people at school. I explained

the whole affair to him, and described the punishment to which I had

been subjected, and which seemed to me unjust. He pacified me, and

exhorted me to be patient, telling me to comfort myself with the

Spanish proverb, un rey no puede morir, which he explained as meaning

that the ruler of a school must of necessity always be in the right.

He could not, of course, help noticing, to his alarm, the effect upon

me of this kind of conversation, which I was far too young to

appreciate. Although it annoyed me one day, when I wanted to begin

reading Goethe’s Faust, to hear him say quietly that I was too young to

understand it, yet, according to my thinking, his other conversations

about our own great poets, and even about Shakespeare and Dante, had

made me so familiar with these sublime figures that I had now for some

time been secretly busy working out the great tragedy I had already

conceived in Dresden. Since my trouble at school I had devoted all my

energies, which ought by rights to have been exclusively directed to my

school duties, to the accomplishment of this task. In this secret work

I had only one confidante, my sister Ottilie, who now lived with me at

my mother’s. I can remember the misgivings and alarm which the first

confidential communication of my great poetic enterprise aroused in my

good sister; yet she affectionately suffered the tortures I sometimes

inflicted on her by reciting to her in secret, but not without emotion,

portions of my work as it progressed. Once, when I was reciting to her

one of the most gruesome scenes, a heavy thunderstorm came on. When the

lightning flashed quite close to us, and the thunder rolled, my sister

felt bound to implore me to stop; but she soon found it was hopeless,

and continued to endure it with touching devotion.

But a more significant storm was brewing on the horizon of my life. My

neglect of school reached such a point that it could not but lead to a

rupture. Whilst my dear mother had no presentiment of this, I awaited

the catastrophe with longing rather than with fear.

In order to meet this crisis with dignity I at length decided to

surprise my family by disclosing to them the secret of my tragedy,

which was now completed. They were to be informed of this great event

by my uncle. I thought I could rely upon his hearty recognition of my

vocation as a great poet on account of the deep harmony between us on

all other questions of life, science, and art. I therefore sent him my

voluminous manuscript, with a long letter which I thought would please

him immensely. In this I communicated to him first my ideas with regard

to the St. Nicholas’s School, and then my firm determination from that

time forward not to allow any mere school pedantry to check my free

development. But the event turned out very different from what I had

expected. It was a great shock to them. My uncle, quite conscious that

he had been indiscreet, paid a visit to my mother and brother-in-law,

in order to report the misfortune that had befallen the family,

reproaching himself for the fact that his influence over me had not

always, perhaps, been for my good. To me he wrote a serious letter of

discouragement; and to this day I cannot understand why he showed so

small a sense of humour in understanding my bad behaviour. To my

surprise he merely said that he reproached himself for having corrupted

me by conversations unsuited to my years, but he made no attempt to

explain to me good-naturedly the error of my ways.

The crime this boy of fifteen had committed was, as I said before, to

have written a great tragedy, entitled Leubald und Adelaïde.

The manuscript of this drama has unfortunately been lost, but I can

still see it clearly in my mind’s eye. The handwriting was most

affected, and the backward-sloping tall letters with which I had aimed

at giving it an air of distinction had already been compared by one of

my teachers to Persian hieroglyphics. In this composition I had

constructed a drama in which I had drawn largely upon Shakespeare’s

Hamlet, King Lear, and Macbeth, and Goethe’s Götz van Berlichingen. The

plot was really based on a modification of Hamlet, the difference

consisting in the fact that my hero is so completely carried away by

the appearance of the ghost of his father, who has been murdered under

similar circumstances, and demands vengeance, that he is driven to

fearful deeds of violence; and, with a series of murders on his

conscience, he eventually goes mad. Leubald, whose character is a

mixture of Hamlet and Harry Hotspur, had promised his father’s ghost to

wipe from the face of the earth the whole race of Roderick, as the

ruthless murderer of the best of fathers was named. After having slain

Roderick himself in mortal combat, and subsequently all his sons and

other relations who supported him, there was only one obstacle that

prevented Leubald from fulfilling the dearest wish of his heart, which

was to be united in death with the shade of his father: a child of

Roderick’s was still alive. During the storming of his castle the

murderer’s daughter had been carried away into safety by a faithful

suitor, whom she, however, detested. I had an irresistible impulse to

call this maiden ‘Adelaïde.’ As even at that early age I was a great

enthusiast for everything really German, I can only account for the

obviously un-German name of my heroine by my infatuation for

Beethoven’s Adelaïde, whose tender refrain seemed to me the symbol of

all loving appeals. The course of my drama was now characterised by the

strange delays which took place in the accomplishment of this last

murder of vengeance, the chief obstacle to which lay in the sudden

passionate love which arose between Leubald and Adelaïde. I succeeded

in representing the birth and avowal of this love by means of

extraordinary adventures. Adelaïde was once more stolen away by a

robber-knight from the lover who had been sheltering her. After Leubald

had thereupon sacrificed the lover and all his relations, he hastened

to the robber’s castle, driven thither less by a thirst for blood than

by a longing for death. For this reason he regrets his inability to

storm the robber’s castle forthwith, because it is well defended, and,

moreover, night is fast falling; he is therefore obliged to pitch his

tent. After raving for a while he sinks down for the first time

exhausted, but being urged, like his prototype Hamlet, by the spirit of

his father to complete his vow of vengeance, he himself suddenly falls

into the power of the enemy during a night assault. In the subterranean

dungeons of the castle he meets Roderick’s daughter for the first time.

She is a prisoner like himself, and is craftily devising flight. Under

circumstances in which she produces on him the impression of a heavenly

vision, she makes her appearance before him. They fall in love, and fly

together into the wilderness, where they realise that they are deadly

enemies. The incipient insanity which was already noticeable in Leubald

breaks out more violently after this discovery, and everything that can

be done to intensify it is contributed by the ghost of his father,

which continually comes between the advances of the lovers. But this

ghost is not the only disturber of the conciliating love of Leubald and

Adelaïde. The ghost of Roderick also appears, and according to the

method followed by Shakespeare in Richard III., he is joined by the

ghosts of all the other members of Adelaïde’s family whom Leubald has

slain. From the incessant importunities of these ghosts Leubald seeks

to free himself by means of sorcery, and calls to his aid a rascal

named Flamming. One of Macbeth’s witches is summoned to lay the ghosts;

as she is unable to do this efficiently, the furious Leubald sends her

also to the devil; but with her dying breath she despatches the whole

crowd of spirits who serve her to join the ghosts of those already

pursuing him. Leubald, tormented beyond endurance, and now at last

raving mad, turns against his beloved, who is the apparent cause of all

his misery. He stabs her in his fury; then finding himself suddenly at

peace, he sinks his head into her lap, and accepts her last caresses as

her life-blood streams over his own dying body.

I had not omitted the smallest detail that could give this plot its

proper colouring, and had drawn on all my knowledge of the tales of the

old knights, and my acquaintance with Lear and Macbeth, to furnish my

drama with the most vivid situations. But one of the chief

characteristics of its poetical form I took from the pathetic,

humorous, and powerful language of Shakespeare. The boldness of my

grandiloquent and bombastic expressions roused my uncle Adolph’s alarm

and astonishment. He was unable to understand how I could have selected

and used with inconceivable exaggeration precisely the most extravagant

forms of speech to be found in Lear and Götz von Berlichingen.

Nevertheless, even after everybody had deafened me with their laments

over my lost time and perverted talents, I was still conscious of a

wonderful secret solace in the face of the calamity that had befallen

me. I knew, a fact that no one else could know, namely, that my work

could only be rightly judged when set to the music which I had resolved

to write for it, and which I intended to start composing immediately.

I must now explain my position with respect to music hitherto. For this

purpose I must go back to my earliest attempts in the art. In my family

two of my sisters were musical; the elder one, Rosalie, played the

piano, without, however, displaying any marked talent. Clara was more

gifted; in addition to a great deal of musical feeling, and a fine rich

touch on the piano, she possessed a particularly sympathetic voice, the

development of which was so premature and remarkable that, under the

tuition of Mieksch, her singing master, who was famous at that time,

she was apparently ready for the role of a prima donna as early as her

sixteenth year, and made her debut at Dresden in Italian opera as

‘Cenerentola’ in Rossini’s opera of that name. Incidentally I may

remark that this premature development proved injurious to Clara’s

voice, and was detrimental to her whole career. As I have said, music

was represented in our family by these two sisters. It was chiefly

owing to Clara’s career that the musical conductor C. M. von Weber

often came to our house. His visits were varied by those of the great

male-soprano Sassaroli; and in addition to these two representatives of

German and Italian music, we also had the company of Mieksch, her

singing master. It was on these occasions that I as a child first heard

German and Italian music discussed, and learnt that any one who wished

to ingratiate himself with the Court must show a preference for Italian

music, a fact which led to very practical results in our family

council. Clara’s talent, while her voice was still sound, was the

object of competition between the representatives of Italian and German

opera. I can remember quite distinctly that from the very beginning I

declared myself in favour of German opera; my choice was determined by

the tremendous impression made on me by the two figures of Sassaroli

and Weber. The Italian male-soprano, a huge pot-bellied giant,

horrified me with his high effeminate voice, his astonishing

volubility, and his incessant screeching laughter. In spite of his

boundless good-nature and amiability, particularly to my family, I took

an uncanny dislike to him. On account of this dreadful person, the

sound of Italian, either spoken or sung, seemed to my ears almost

diabolical; and when, in consequence of my poor sister’s misfortune, I

heard them often talking about Italian intrigues and cabals, I

conceived so strong a dislike for everything connected with this nation

that even in much later years I used to feel myself carried away by an

impulse of utter detestation and abhorrence.

The less frequent visits of Weber, on the other hand, seemed to have

produced upon me those first sympathetic impressions which I have never

since lost. In contrast to Sassaroli’s repulsive figure, Weber’s really

refined, delicate, and intellectual appearance excited my ecstatic

admiration. His narrow face and finely-cut features, his vivacious

though often half-closed eyes, captivated and thrilled me; whilst even

the bad limp with which he walked, and which I often noticed from our

windows when the master was making his way home past our house from the

fatiguing rehearsals, stamped the great musician in my imagination as

an exceptional and almost superhuman being. When, as a boy of nine, my

mother introduced me to him, and he asked me what I was going to be,

whether I wanted perhaps to be a musician, my mother told him that,

though I was indeed quite mad on Freischutz, yet she had as yet seen

nothing in me which indicated any musical talent.

This showed correct observation on my mother’s part; nothing had made

so great an impression on me as the music of Freischutz, and I tried in

every possible way to procure a repetition of the impressions I had

received from it, but, strange to say, least of all by the study of

music itself. Instead of this, I contented myself with hearing bits

from Freischutz played by my sisters. Yet my passion for it gradually

grew so strong that I can remember taking a particular fancy for a

young man called Spiess, chiefly because he could play the overture to

Freischutz, which I used to ask him to do whenever I met him. It was

chiefly the introduction to this overture which at last led me to

attempt, without ever having received any instruction on the piano, to

play this piece in my own peculiar way, for, oddly enough, I was the

only child in our family who had not been given music lessons. This was

probably due to my mother’s anxiety to keep me away from any artistic

interests of this kind in case they might arouse in me a longing for

the theatre.

When I was about twelve years old, however, my mother engaged a tutor

for me named Humann, from whom I received regular music lessons, though

only of a very mediocre description. As soon as I had acquired a very

imperfect knowledge of fingering I begged to be allowed to play

overtures in the form of duets, always keeping Weber as the goal of my

ambition. When at length I had got so far as to be able to play the

overture to Freischutz myself, though in a very faulty manner, I felt

the object of my study had been attained, and I had no inclination to

devote any further attention to perfecting my technique.

Yet I had attained this much: I was no longer dependent for music on

the playing of others; from this time forth I used to try and play,

albeit very imperfectly, everything I wanted to know. I also tried

Mozart’s Don Juan, but was unable to get any pleasure out of it, mainly

because the Italian text in the arrangement for the piano placed the

music in a frivolous light in my eyes, and much in it seemed to me

trivial and unmanly. (I can remember that when my sister used to sing

Zerlinen’s ariette, Batti, batti, ben Masetto, the music repelled me,

as it seemed so mawkish and effeminate.)

On the other hand, my bent for music grew stronger and stronger, and I

now tried to possess myself of my favourite pieces by making my own

copies. I can remember the hesitation with which my mother for the

first time gave me the money to buy the scored paper on which I copied

out Weber’s Lutzow’s Jagd, which was the first piece of music I

transcribed.

Music was still a secondary occupation with me when the news of Weber’s

death and the longing to learn his music to Oberon fanned my enthusiasm

into flame again. This received fresh impetus from the afternoon

concerts in the Grosser Garten at Dresden, where I often heard my

favourite music played by Zillmann’s Town Band, as I thought,

exceedingly well. The mysterious joy I felt in hearing an orchestra

play quite close to me still remains one of my most pleasant memories.

The mere tuning up of the instruments put me in a state of mystic

excitement; even the striking of fifths on the violin seemed to me like

a greeting from the spirit world—which, I may mention incidentally, had

a very real meaning for me. When I was still almost a baby, the sound

of these fifths, which has always excited me, was closely associated in

my mind with ghosts and spirits. I remember that even much later in

life I could never pass the small palace of Prince Anthony, at the end

of the Ostra Allee in Dresden, without a shudder; for it was there I

had first heard the sound of a violin, a very common experience to me

afterwards. It was close by me, and seemed to my ears to come from the

stone figures with which this palace is adorned, some of which are

provided with musical instruments. When I took up my post as musical

conductor at Dresden, and had to pay my official visit to Morgenroth,

the President of the Concert Committee, an elderly gentleman who lived

for many years opposite that princely palace, it seemed odd to find

that the player of fifths who had so strongly impressed my musical

fancy as a boy was anything but a supernatural spectre. And when I saw

the well-known picture in which a skeleton plays on his violin to an

old man on his deathbed, the ghostly character of those very notes

impressed itself with particular force upon my childish imagination.

When at last, as a young man, I used to listen to the Zillmann

Orchestra in the Grosser Garten almost every afternoon, one may imagine

the rapturous thrill with which I drew in all the chaotic variety of

sound that I heard as the orchestra tuned up: the long drawn A of the

oboe, which seemed like a call from the dead to rouse the other

instruments, never failed to raise all my nerves to a feverish pitch of

tension, and when the swelling C in the overture to Freischutz told me

that I had stepped, as it were with both feet, right into the magic

realm of awe. Any one who had been watching me at that moment could

hardly have failed to see the state I was in, and this in spite of the

fact that I was such a bad performer on the piano.

Another work also exercised a great fascination over me, namely, the

overture to Fidelio in E major, the introduction to which affected me

deeply. I asked my sisters about Beethoven, and learned that the news

of his death had just arrived. Obsessed as I still was by the terrible

grief caused by Weber’s death, this fresh loss, due to the decease of

this great master of melody, who had only just entered my life, filled

me with strange anguish, a feeling nearly akin to my childish dread of

the ghostly fifths on the violin. It was now Beethoven’s music that I

longed to know more thoroughly; I came to Leipzig, and found his music

to Egmont on the piano at my sister Louisa’s. After that I tried to get

hold of his sonatas. At last, at a concert at the Gewandthaus, I heard

one of the master’s symphonies for the first time; it was the Symphony

in A major. The effect on me was indescribable. To this must be added

the impression produced on me by Beethoven’s features, which I saw in

the lithographs that were circulated everywhere at that time, and by

the fact that he was deaf, and lived a quiet secluded life. I soon

conceived an image of him in my mind as a sublime and unique

supernatural being, with whom none could compare. This image was

associated in my brain with that of Shakespeare; in ecstatic dreams I

met both of them, saw and spoke to them, and on awakening found myself

bathed in tears.

It was at this time that I came across Mozart’s Requiem, which formed

the starting-point of my enthusiastic absorption in the works of that

master. His second finale to Don Juan inspired me to include him in my

spirit world.

I was now filled with a desire to compose, as I had before been to

write verse. I had, however, in this case to master the technique of an

entirely separate and complicated subject. This presented greater

difficulties than I had met with in writing verse, which came to me

fairly easily. It was these difficulties that drove me to adopt a

career which bore some resemblance to that of a professional musician,

whose future distinction would be to win the titles of Conductor and

Writer of Opera.

I now wanted to set Leubald und Adelaïde to music, similar to that

which Beethoven wrote to Goethe’s Egmont; the various ghosts from the

spirit world, who were each to display different characteristics, were

to borrow their own distinctive colouring from appropriate musical

accompaniment. In order to acquire the necessary technique of

composition quickly I studied Logier’s Methode des Generalbasses, a

work which was specially recommended to me at a musical lending library

as a suitable text-book from which this art might be easily mastered. I

have distinct recollections that the financial difficulties with which

I was continually harassed throughout my life began at this time. I

borrowed Logier’s book on the weekly payment system, in the fond hope

of having to pay for it only during a few weeks out of the savings of

my weekly pocket-money. But the weeks ran on into months, and I was

still unable to compose as well as I wished. Mr. Frederick Wieck, whose

daughter afterwards married Robert Schumann, was at that time the

proprietor of that lending library. He kept sending me troublesome

reminders of the debt I owed him; and when my bill had almost reached

the price of Logier’s book I had to make a clean breast of the matter

to my family, who thus not only learnt of my financial difficulties in

general, but also of my latest transgression into the domain of music,

from which, of course, at the very most, they expected nothing better

than a repetition of Leubald und Adelaïde.

There was great consternation at home; my mother, sister, and

brother-in-law, with anxious faces, discussed how my studies should be

superintended in future, to prevent my having any further opportunity

for transgressing in this way. No one, however, yet knew the real state

of affairs at school, and they hoped I would soon see the error of my

ways in this case as I had in my former craze for poetry.

But other domestic changes were taking place which necessitated my

being for some little time alone in our house at Leipzig during the

summer of 1829, when I was left entirely to my own devices. It was

during this period that my passion for music rose to an extraordinary

degree. I had secretly been taking lessons in harmony from G. Muller,

afterwards organist at Altenburg, an excellent musician belonging to

the Leipzig orchestra. Although the payment of these lessons was also

destined to get me into hot water at home later on, I could not even

make up to my teacher for the delay in the payment of his fees by

giving him the pleasure of watching me improve in my studies. His

teaching and exercises soon filled me with the greatest disgust, as to

my mind it all seemed so dry. For me music was a spirit, a noble and

mystic monster, and any attempt to regulate it seemed to lower it in my

eyes. I gathered much more congenial instruction about it from

Hoffmann’s Phantasiestucken than from my Leipzig orchestra player; and

now came the time when I really lived and breathed in Hoffmann’s

artistic atmosphere of ghosts and spirits. With my head quite full of

Kreissler, Krespel, and other musical spectres from my favourite

author, I imagined that I had at last found in real life a creature who

resembled them: this ideal musician in whom for a time I fancied I had

discovered a second Kreissler was a man called Flachs. He was a tall,

exceedingly thin man, with a very narrow head and an extraordinary way

of walking, moving, and speaking, whom I had seen at all those open-air

concerts which formed my principal source of musical education. He was

always with the members of the orchestra, speaking exceedingly quickly,

first to one and then the other; for they all knew him, and seemed to

like him. The fact that they were making fun of him I only learned, to

my great confusion, much later. I remember having noticed this strange

figure from my earliest days in Dresden, and I gathered from the

conversations which I overheard that he was indeed well known to all

Dresden musicians. This circumstance alone was sufficient to make me

take a great interest in him; but the point about him which attracted

me more than anything was the manner in which he listened to the

various items in the programme: he used to give peculiar, convulsive

nods of his head, and blow out his cheeks as though with sighs. All

this I regarded as a sign of spiritual ecstasy. I noticed, moreover,

that he was quite alone, that he belonged to no party, and paid no

attention to anything in the garden save the music; whereupon my

identification of this curious being with the conductor Kreissler

seemed quite natural. I was determined to make his acquaintance, and I

succeeded in doing so. Who shall describe my delight when, on going to

call on him at his rooms for the first time, I found innumerable

bundles of scores! I had as yet never seen a score. It is true I

discovered, to my regret, that he possessed nothing either by

Beethoven, Mozart, or Weber; in fact, nothing but immense quantities of

works, masses, and cantatas by composers such as Staerkel, Stamitz,

Steibelt, etc., all of whom were entirely unknown to me. Yet Flachs was

able to tell me so much that was good about them that the respect which

I felt for scores in general helped me to overcome my regret at not

finding anything by my beloved masters. It is true I learnt later that

poor Flachs had only come into the possession of these particular

scores through unscrupulous dealers, who had traded on his weakness of

intellect and palmed off this worthless music on him for large sums of

money. At all events, they were scores, and that was quite enough for

me. Flachs and I became most intimate; we were always seen going about

together—I, a lanky boy of sixteen, and this weird, shaky flaxpole. The

doors of my deserted home were often opened for this strange guest, who

made me play my compositions to him while he ate bread and cheese. In

return, he once arranged one of my airs for wind instruments, and, to

my astonishment, it was actually accepted and played by the band in

Kintschy’s Swiss Chalet. That this man had not the smallest capacity to

teach me anything never once occurred to me; I was so firmly convinced

of his originality that there was no need for him to prove it further

than by listening patiently to my enthusiastic outpourings. But as, in

course of time, several of his own friends joined us, I could not help

noticing that the worthy Flachs was regarded by them all as a

half-witted fool. At first this merely pained me, but a strange

incident unexpectedly occurred which converted me to the general

opinion about him. Flachs was a man of some means, and had fallen into

the toils of a young lady of dubious character who he believed was

deeply in love with him. One day, without warning, I found his house

closed to me, and discovered, to my astonishment, that jealousy was the

cause. The unexpected discovery of this liaison, which was my first

experience of such a case, filled me with a strange horror. My friend

suddenly appeared to me even more mad than he really was. I felt so

ashamed of my persistent blindness that for some time to come I never

went to any of the garden concerts for fear I should meet my sham

Kreissler.

By this time I had composed my first Sonata in D minor. I had also

begun a pastoral play, and had worked it out in what I felt sure must

be an entirely unprecedented way.

I chose Goethe’s Laune der Verliebten as a model for the form and plot

of my work. I scarcely even drafted out the libretto, however, but

worked it out at the same time as the music and orchestration, so that,

while I was writing out one page of the score, I had not even thought

out the words for the next page. I remember distinctly that following

this extraordinary method, although I had not acquired the slightest

knowledge about writing for instruments, I actually worked out a fairly

long passage which finally resolved itself into a scene for three

female voices followed by the air for the tenor. My bent for writing

for the orchestra was so strong that I procured a score of Don Juan,

and set to work on what I then considered a very careful orchestration

of a fairly long air for soprano. I also wrote a quartette in D major

after I had myself sufficiently mastered the alto for the viola, my

ignorance of which had caused me great difficulty only a short time

before, when I was studying a quartette by Haydn.

Armed with these works, I set out in the summer on my first journey as

a musician. My sister Clara, who was married to the singer Wolfram, had

an engagement at the theatre at Magdeburg, whither, in characteristic

fashion, I set forth upon my adventure on foot.

My short stay with my relations provided me with many experiences of

musical life. It was there that I met a new freak, whose influence upon

me I have never been able to forget. He was a musical conductor of the

name of Kuhnlein, a most extraordinary person. Already advanced in

years, delicate and, unfortunately, given to drink, this man

nevertheless impressed one by something striking and vigorous in his

expression. His chief characteristics were an enthusiastic worship of

Mozart and a passionate depreciation of Weber. He had read only one

book—Goethe’s Faust—and in this work there was not a page in which he

had not underlined some passage, and made some remark in praise of

Mozart or in disparagement of Weber. It was to this man that my

brother-in-law confided the compositions which I had brought with me in

order to learn his opinion of my abilities. One evening, as we were

sitting comfortably in an inn, old Kuhnlein came in, and approached us

with a friendly, though serious manner.

I thought I read good news in his features, but when my brother-in-law

asked him what he thought of my work, he answered quietly and calmly,

‘There is not a single good note in it!’ My brother-in-law, who was

accustomed to Kuhnlein’s eccentricity, gave a loud laugh which

reassured me somewhat. It was impossible to get any advice or coherent

reasons for his opinion out of Kuhnlein; he merely renewed his abuse of

Weber and made some references to Mozart which, nevertheless, made a

deep impression upon me, as Kuhnlein’s language was always very heated

and emphatic.

On the other hand, this visit brought me a great treasure, which was

responsible for leading me in a very different direction from that

advised by Kuhnlein. This was the score of Beethoven’s great Quartette

in E flat major, which had only been fairly recently published, and of

which my brother-in-law had a copy made for me. Richer in experience,

and in the possession of this treasure, I returned to Leipzig to the

nursery of my queer musical studies. But my family had now returned

with my sister Rosalie, and I could no longer keep secret from them the

fact that my connection with the school had been entirely suspended,

for a notice was found saying that I had not attended the school for

the last six months. As a complaint addressed by the rector to my uncle

about me had not received adequate attention, the school authorities

had apparently made no further attempts to exercise any supervision

over me, which I had indeed rendered quite impossible by absenting

myself altogether.

A fresh council of war was held in the family to discuss what was to be

done with me. As I laid particular stress on my bent for music, my

relations thought that I ought, at any rate, to learn one instrument

thoroughly. My brother-in-law, Brockhaus, proposed to send me to

Hummel, at Weimar, to be trained as a pianist, but as I loudly

protested that by ‘music’ I meant ‘composing,’ and not ‘playing an

instrument,’ they gave way, and decided to let me have regular lessons

in harmony from Muller, the very musician from whom I had had

instruction on the sly some little while before, and who had not yet

been paid. In return for this I promised faithfully to go back to work

conscientiously at St. Nicholas’s School. I soon grew tired of both. I

could brook no control, and this unfortunately applied to my musical

instruction as well. The dry study of harmony disgusted me more and

more, though I continued to conceive fantasias, sonatas, and overtures,

and work them out by myself. On the other hand, I was spurred on by

ambition to show what I could do at school if I liked. When the Upper

School boys were set the task of writing a poem, I composed a chorus in

Greek, on the recent War of Liberation. I can well imagine that this

Greek poem had about as much resemblance to a real Greek oration and

poetry, as the sonatas and overtures I used to compose at that time had

to thoroughly professional music. My attempt was scornfully rejected as

a piece of impudence. After that I have no further recollections of my

school. My continued attendance was a pure sacrifice on my side, made

out of consideration for my family: I did not pay the slightest

attention to what was taught in the lessons, but secretly occupied

myself all the while with reading any book that happened to attract me.

As my musical instruction also did me no good, I continued in my wilful

process of self-education by copying out the scores of my beloved

masters, and in so doing acquired a neat handwriting, which in later

years has often been admired. I believe my copies of the C minor

Symphony and the Ninth Symphony by Beethoven are still preserved as

souvenirs.

Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony became the mystical goal of all my strange

thoughts and desires about music. I was first attracted to it by the

opinion prevalent among musicians, not only in Leipzig but elsewhere,

that this work had been written by Beethoven when he was already half

mad. It was considered the ‘non plus ultra’ of all that was fantastic

and incomprehensible, and this was quite enough to rouse in me a

passionate desire to study this mysterious work. At the very first

glance at the score, of which I obtained possession with such

difficulty, I felt irresistibly attracted by the long-sustained pure

fifths with which the first phrase opens: these chords, which, as I

related above, had played such a supernatural part in my childish

impressions of music, seemed in this case to form the spiritual keynote

of my own life. This, I thought, must surely contain the secret of all

secrets, and accordingly the first thing to be done was to make the

score my own by a process of laborious copying. I well remember that on

one occasion the sudden appearance of the dawn made such an uncanny

impression on my excited nerves that I jumped into bed with a scream as

though I had seen a ghost. The symphony at that time had not yet been

arranged for the piano; it had found so little favour that the

publisher did not feel inclined to run the risk of producing it. I set

to work at it, and actually composed a complete piano solo, which I

tried to play to myself. I sent my work to Schott, the publisher of the

score, at Mainz. I received in reply a letter saying ‘that the

publishers had not yet decided to issue the Ninth Symphony for the

piano, but that they would gladly keep my laborious work,’ and offered

me remuneration in the shape of the score of the great Missa Solemnis

in D, which I accepted with great pleasure.

In addition to this work I practised the violin for some time, as my

harmony master very rightly considered that some knowledge of the

practical working of this instrument was indispensable for any one who

had the intention of composing for the orchestra. My mother, indeed,

paid the violinist Sipp (who was still playing in the Leipzig orchestra

in 1865) eight thalers for a violin (I do not know what became of it),

with which for quite three months I must have inflicted unutterable

torture upon my mother and sister by practising in my tiny little room.

I got so far as to play certain Variations in F sharp by Mayseder, but

only reached the second or third. After that I have no further

recollections of this practising, in which my family fortunately had

very good reasons of their own for not encouraging me.

But the time now arrived when my interest in the theatre again took a

passionate hold upon me. A new company had been formed in my birthplace

under very good auspices. The Board of Management of the Court Theatre

at Dresden had taken over the management of the Leipzig theatre for

three years. My sister Rosalie was a member of the company, and through

her I could always gain admittance to the performances; and that which

in my childhood had been merely the interest aroused by a strange

spirit of curiosity now became a more deep-seated and conscious

passion.

Julius Caesar, Macbeth, Hamlet, the plays of Schiller, and to crown

all, Goethe’s Faust, excited and stirred me deeply. The Opera was

giving the first performances of Marschner’s Vampir and Templer und

Judin. The Italian company arrived from Dresden, and fascinated the

Leipzig audience by their consummate mastery of their art. Even I was

almost carried away by the enthusiasm with which the town was

over-whelmed, into forgetting the boyish impressions which Signor

Sassaroli had stamped upon my mind, when another miracle—which also

came to us from Dresden—suddenly gave a new direction to my artistic

feelings and exercised a decisive influence over my whole life. This

consisted of a special performance given by Wilhelmine

Schroder-Devrient, who at that time was at the zenith of her artistic

career, young, beautiful, and ardent, and whose like I have never again

seen on the stage. She made her appearance in Fidelio.

If I look back on my life as a whole, I can find no event that produced

so profound an impression upon me. Any one who can remember that

wonderful woman at this period of her life must to some extent have

experienced the almost Satanic ardour which the intensely human art of

this incomparable actress poured into his veins. After the performance

I rushed to a friend’s house and wrote a short note to the singer, in

which I briefly told her that from that moment my life had acquired its

true significance, and that if in days to come she should ever hear my

name praised in the world of Art, she must remember that she had that

evening made me what I then swore it was my destiny to become. This

note I left at her hotel, and ran out into the night as if I were mad.

In the year 1842, when I went to Dresden to make my debut with Rienzi,

I paid several visits to the kind-hearted singer, who startled me on

one occasion by repeating this letter word for word. It seemed to have

made an impression on her too, as she had actually kept it.

At this point I feel myself obliged to acknowledge that the great

confusion which now began to prevail in my life, and particularly in my

studies, was due to the inordinate effect this artistic interpretation

had upon me. I did not know where to turn, or how to set about

producing something myself which might place me in direct contact with

the impression I had received, while everything that could not be

brought into touch with it seemed to me so shallow and meaningless that

I could not possibly trouble myself with it. I should have liked to

compose a work worthy of a Schroder-Devrient; but as this was quite

beyond my power, in my head-long despair I let all artistic endeavour

slide, and as my work was also utterly insufficient to absorb me, I

flung myself recklessly into the life of the moment in the company of

strangely chosen associates, and indulged in all kinds of youthful

excesses.

I now entered into all the dissipations of raw manhood, the outward

ugliness and inward emptiness of which make me marvel to this day. My

intercourse with those of my own age had always been the result of pure

chance. I cannot remember that any special inclination or attraction

determined me in the choice of my young friends. While I can honestly

say that I was never in a position to stand aloof out of envy from any

one who was specially gifted, I can only explain my indifference in the

choice of my associates by the fact that through inexperience regarding

the sort of companionship that would be of advantage to me, I cared

only to have some one who would accompany me in my excursions, and to

whom I could pour out my feelings to my heart’s content without caring

what effect it might have upon him. The result of this was that after a

stream of confidences to which my own excitement was the only response,

I at length reached the point when I turned and looked at my friend; to

my astonishment I generally found that there was no question of

response at all, and as soon as I set my heart on drawing something

from him in return, and urged him to confide in me, when he really had

nothing to tell, the connection usually came to an end and left no

trace on my life. In a certain sense my strange relationship with

Flachs was typical of the great majority of my ties in after-life.

Consequently, as no lasting personal bond of friendship ever found its

way into my life, it is easy to understand how delight in the

dissipations of student life could become a passion of some duration,

because in it individual intercourse is entirely replaced by a common

circle of acquaintances. In the midst of rowdyism and ragging of the

most foolish description, I remained quite alone, and it is quite

possible that these frivolities formed a protecting hedge round my

inmost soul, which needed time to grow to its natural strength and not

be weakened by reaching maturity too soon.

My life seemed to break up in all directions; I had to leave St.

Nicholas’s School at Easter 1830, as I was too deeply in disgrace with

the staff of masters ever to hope for any promotion in the University

from that quarter. It was now determined that I should study privately

for six months and then go to St. Thomas’s School, where I should be in

fresh surroundings and be able to work up and qualify in a short time

for the University. My uncle Adolph, with whom I was constantly

renewing my friendship, and who also encouraged me about my music and

exercised a good influence over me in that respect, in spite of the

utter degradation of my life at that time, kept arousing in me an ever

fresh desire for scientific studies. I took private lessons in Greek

from a scholar, and read Sophocles with him. For a time I hoped this

noble poet would again inspire me to get a real hold on the language,

but the hope was vain. I had not chosen the right teacher, and,

moreover, his sitting-room in which we pursued our studies looked out

on a tanyard, the repulsive odour of which affected my nerves so

strongly that I became thoroughly disgusted both with Sophocles and

Greek. My brother-in-law, Brockhaus, who wanted to put me in the way of

earning some pocket-money, gave me the correcting of the proof-sheets

of a new edition he was bringing out of Becker’s Universal History,

revised by Lobell. This gave me a reason for improving by private study

the superficial general instruction on every subject which is given at

school, and I thus acquired the valuable knowledge which I was destined

to have in later life of most of the branches of learning so

uninterestingly taught in class. I must not forget to mention that, to

a certain extent, the attraction exercised over me by this first closer

study of history was due to the fact that it brought me in eightpence a

sheet, and I thus found myself in one of the rarest positions in my

life, actually earning money; yet I should be doing myself an injustice

if I did not bear in mind the vivid impressions I now for the first

time received upon turning my serious attention to those periods of

history with which I had hitherto had a very superficial acquaintance.

All I recollect about my school days in this connection is that I was

attracted by the classical period of Greek history; Marathon, Salamis,

and Thermopylae composed the canon of all that interested me in the

subject. Now for the first time I made an intimate acquaintance with

the Middle Ages and the French Revolution, as my work in correcting

dealt precisely with the two volumes which contained these two periods.

I remember in particular that the description of the Revolution filled

me with sincere hatred for its heroes; unfamiliar as I was with the

previous history of France, my human sympathy was horrified by the

cruelty of the men of that day, and this purely human impulse remained

so strong in me that I remember how even quite recently it cost me a

real struggle to give any weight to the true political significance of

those acts of violence.

How great, then, was my astonishment when one day the current political

events of the time enabled me, as it were, to gain a personal

experience of the sort of national upheavals with which I had come into

distant contact in the course of my proof-correcting. The special

editions of the Leipzig Gazette brought us the news of the July

Revolution in Paris. The King of France had been driven from his

throne; Lafayette, who a moment before had seemed a myth to me, was

again riding through a cheering crowd in the streets of Paris; the

Swiss Guards had once more been butchered in the Tuileries, and a new

King knew no better way of commending himself to the populace than by

declaring himself the embodiment of the Republic. Suddenly to become

conscious of living at a time in which such things took place could not

fail to have a startling effect on a boy of seventeen. The world as a

historic phenomenon began from that day in my eyes, and naturally my

sympathies were wholly on the side of the Revolution, which I regarded

in the light of a heroic popular struggle crowned with victory, and

free from the blemish of the terrible excesses that stained the first

French Revolution. As the whole of Europe, including some of the German

states, was soon plunged more or less violently into rebellion, I

remained for some time in a feverish state of suspense, and now first

turned my attention to the causes of these upheavals, which I regarded

as struggles of the young and hopeful against the old and effete

portion of mankind. Saxony also did not remain unscathed; in Dresden it

came to actual fighting in the streets, which immediately produced a

political change in the shape of the proclamation of the regency of the

future King Frederick, and the granting of a constitution. This event

filled me with such enthusiasm that I composed a political overture,

the prelude of which depicted dark oppression in the midst of which a

strain was at last heard under which, to make my meaning clearer, I

wrote the words Friedrich und Freiheil; this strain was intended to

develop gradually and majestically into the fullest triumph, which I

hoped shortly to see successfully performed at one of the Leipzig

Garden Concerts.

However, before I was able to develop my politico-musical conceptions

further, disorders broke out in Leipzig itself which summoned me from

the precincts of Art to take a direct share in national life. National

life in Leipzig at this time meant nothing more than antagonism between

the students and the police, the latter being the arch-enemy upon whom

the youthful love of liberty vented itself. Some students had been

arrested in a street broil who were now to be rescued. The

under-graduates, who had been restless for some days, assembled one

evening in the Market Place and the Clubs, mustered together, and made

a ring round their leaders. The whole proceeding was marked by a

certain measured solemnity, which impressed me deeply. They sang

Gaudeamus igitur, formed up into column, and picking up from the crowd

any young men who sympathised with them, marched gravely and resolutely

from the Market Place to the University buildings, to open the cells

and set free the students who had been arrested. My heart beat fast as

I marched with them to this ‘Taking of the Bastille,’ but things did

not turn out as we expected, for in the courtyard of the Paulinum the

solemn procession was stopped by Rector Krug, who had come down to meet

it with his grey head bared; his assurance that the captives had

already been released at his request was greeted with a thundering

cheer, and the matter seemed at an end.

But the tense expectation of a revolution had grown too great not to

demand some sacrifice. A summons was suddenly spread calling us to a

notorious alley in order to exercise popular justice upon a hated

magistrate who, it was rumoured, had unlawfully taken under his

protection a certain house of ill-fame in that quarter. When I reached

the spot with the tail-end of the crowd, I found the house had been

broken into and all sorts of violence had been committed. I recall with

horror the intoxicating effect this unreasoning fury had upon me, and

cannot deny that without the slightest personal provocation I shared,

like one possessed, in the frantic onslaught of the undergraduates, who

madly shattered furniture and crockery to bits. I do not believe that

the ostensible motive for this outrage, which, it is true, was to be

found in a fact that was a grave menace to public morality, had any

weight with me whatever; on the contrary, it was the purely devilish

fury of these popular outbursts that drew me, too, like a madman into

their vortex.

The fact that such fits of fury are not quick to abate, but, in

accordance with certain natural laws, reach their proper conclusion

only after they have degenerated into frenzy, I was to learn in my own

person. Scarcely did the summons ring out for us to march to another

resort of the same kind than I too found myself in the tide which set

towards the opposite end of the town. There the same exploits were

repeated, and the most ludicrous outrages perpetrated. I cannot

remember that the enjoyment of alcoholic drinks contributed to the

intoxication of myself and my immediate fellows. I only know that I

finally got into the state that usually succeeds a debauch, and upon

waking next morning, as if from a hideous nightmare, had to convince

myself that I had really taken part in the events of the previous night

by a trophy I possessed in the shape of a tattered red curtain, which I

had brought home as a token of my prowess. The thought that people

generally, and my own family in particular, were wont to put a lenient

construction upon youthful escapades was a great comfort to me;

outbursts of this kind on the part of the young were regarded as

righteous indignation against really serious scandals, and there was no

need for me to be afraid of owning up to having taken part in such

excesses.

The dangerous example, however, which had been set by the

undergraduates incited the lower classes and the mob to similar

excesses on the following nights, against employers and any who were

obnoxious to them. The matter at once assumed a more serious

complexion; property was threatened, and a conflict between rich and

poor stood grinning at our doors. As there were no soldiers in the

town, and the police were thoroughly disorganised, the students were

called in as a protection against the lower orders. An undergraduate’s

hour of glory now began, such as I could only have thirsted for in my

schoolboy dreams. The student became the tutelar deity of Leipzig,

called on by the authorities to arm and band together in defence of

property, and the same young men who two days before had yielded to a

rage for destruction, now mustered in the University courtyard. The

proscribed names of the students’ clubs and unions were shouted by the

mouths of town councillors and chief constables in order to summon

curiously equipped undergraduates, who thereupon, in simple mediaeval

array of war, scattered throughout the town, occupied the guard-rooms

at the gates, provided sentinels for the grounds of various wealthy

merchants, and, as occasion demanded, took places which seemed

threatened, more especially inns, under their permanent protection.

Though, unluckily, I was not yet a member of their body, I anticipated

the delights of academic citizenship by half-impudent, half-obsequious

solicitation of the leaders of the students whom I honoured most. I had

the good fortune to recommend myself particularly to these ‘cocks of

the walk,’ as they were styled, on account of my relationship to

Brockhaus, in whose grounds the main body of these champions were

encamped for some time. My brother-in-law was among those who had been

seriously threatened, and it was only owing to really great presence of

mind and assurance that he succeeded in saving his printing works, and

especially his steam presses, which were the chief object of attack,

from destruction. To protect his property against further assault,

detachments of students were told off to his grounds as well; the

excellent entertainment which the generous master of the house offered

his jovial guardians in his pleasant summer-house enticed the pick of

the students to him. My brother-in-law was for several weeks guarded

day and night against possible attacks by the populace, and on this

occasion, as the mediator of a flowing hospitality, I celebrated among

the most famous ‘bloods’ of the University the true saturnalia of my

scholarly ambition.

For a still longer period the guarding of the gates was entrusted to

the students; the unheard-of splendour which accordingly became

associated with this post drew fresh aspirants to the spot from far and

near. Every day huge chartered vehicles discharged at the Halle Gate

whole bands of the boldest sons of learning from Halle, Jena,

Gottingen, and the remotest regions. They got down close to the guards

at the gate, and for several weeks never set foot in an inn or any

other dwelling; they lived at the expense of the Council, drew vouchers

on the police for food and drink, and knew but one care, that the

possibility of a general quieting of men’s minds would make their

opportune guardianship superfluous. I never missed a day on guard or a

night either, alas! trying to impress on my family the urgent need for

my personal endurance. Of course, the quieter and really studious

spirits among us soon resigned these duties, and only the flower of the

flock of undergraduates remained so staunch that it became difficult

for the authorities to relieve them of their task. I held out to the

very last, and succeeded in making most astonishing friends for my age.

Many of the most audacious remained in Leipzig even when there was no

guard duty to fulfil, and peopled the place for some time with

champions of an extraordinarily desperate and dissipated type, who had

been repeatedly sent down from various universities for rowdyism or

debt, and who now, thanks to the exceptional circumstances of the day,

found a refuge in Leipzig, where at first they had been received with

open arms by the general enthusiasm of their comrades.

In the presence of all these phenomena I felt as if I were surrounded

by the results of an earthquake which had upset the usual order of

things. My brother-in-law, Friedrich Brockhaus, who could justly taunt

the former authorities of the place with their inability to maintain

peace and order, was carried away by the current of a formidable

movement of opposition. He made a daring speech at the Guildhall before

their worships the Town Council, which brought him popularity, and he

was appointed second-in-command of the newly constituted Leipzig

Municipal Guard. This body at length ousted my adored students from the

guard-rooms of the town gates, and we no longer had the right of

stopping travellers and inspecting their passes. On the other hand, I

flattered myself that I might regard my new position as a boy citizen

as equivalent to that of the French National Guard, and my

brother-in-law, Brockhaus, as a Saxon Lafayette, which, at all events,

succeeded in furnishing my soaring excitement with a healthy stimulant.

I now began to read the papers and cultivate politics enthusiastically;

however, the social intercourse of the civic world did not attract me

sufficiently to make me false to my beloved academic associates. I

followed them faithfully from the guard-rooms to the ordinary bars,

where their splendour as men of the literary world now sought

retirement.

My chief ambition was to become one of them as soon as possible. This,

however, could only be accomplished by being again entered at a grammar

school. St. Thomas’s, whose headmaster was a feeble old man, was the

place where my wishes could be most speedily attained.

I joined the school in the autumn of 1830 simply with the intention of

qualifying myself for the Leaving Examination by merely nominal

attendance there. The chief thing in connection with it was that I and

friends of the same bent succeeded in establishing a sham students’

association called the Freshman’s Club. It was formed with all possible

pedantry, the institution of the ‘Comment’ was introduced,

fencing-practice and sword-bouts were held, and an inaugural meeting to

which several prominent students were invited, and at which I presided

as ‘Vice’ in white buckskin trousers and great jack-boots, gave me a

foretaste of the delights awaiting me as a full-blown son of the Muses.

The masters of St. Thomas’s, however, were not quite so ready to fall

in with my aspirations to studentship; at the end of the half-year they

were of the opinion that I had not given a thought to their

institution, and nothing could persuade them that I had earned a title

to academic citizenship by any acquisition of knowledge. Some sort of

decision was necessary, so I accordingly informed my family that I had

made up my mind not to study for a profession at the University, but to

become a musician. There was nothing to prevent me matriculating as

‘Studiosus Musicae,’ and, without therefore troubling myself about the

pedantries of the authorities at St. Thomas’s, I defiantly quitted that

seat of learning from which I had derived small profit, and presented

myself forthwith to the rector of the University, whose acquaintance I

had made on the evening of the riot, to be enrolled as a student of

music. This was accordingly done without further ado, on the payment of

the usual fees.

I was in a great hurry about it, for in a week the Easter vacation

would begin, and the ‘men’ would go down from Leipzig, when it would be

impossible to be elected member of a club until the vacation was over,

and to stay all those weeks at home in Leipzig without having the right

to wear the coveted colours seemed to me unendurable torture. Straight

from the rector’s presence I ran like a wounded animal to the fencing

school, to present myself for admission to the Saxon Club, showing my

card of matriculation. I attained my object, I could wear the colours

of the Saxonia, which was in the fashion at that time, and in great

request because it numbered so many delightful members in its ranks.

The strangest fate was to befall me in this Easter vacation, during

which I was really the only remaining representative of the Saxon Club

in Leipzig. In the beginning this club consisted chiefly of men of good

family as well as the better class elements of the student world; all

of them were members of highly placed and well-to-do families in Saxony

in general, and in particular from the capital, Dresden, and spent

their vacation at their respective homes. There remained in Leipzig

during the vacations only those wandering students who had no homes,

and for whom in reality it was always or never holiday time. Among

those a separate club had arisen of daring and desperate young

reprobates who had found a last refuge, as I said, at Leipzig in the

glorious period I have recorded. I had already made the personal

acquaintance of these swashbucklers, who pleased my fancy greatly, when

they were guarding the Brockhaus grounds. Although the regular duration

of a university course did not exceed three years, most of these men

had never left their universities for six or seven years.

I was particularly fascinated by a man called Gebhardt, who was endowed

with extraordinary physical beauty and strength, and whose slim heroic

figure towered head and shoulders above all his companions. When he

walked down the street arm-in-arm with two of the strongest of his

comrades, he used suddenly to take it into his head, by an easy

movement of his arm, to lift his friends high in the air and flutter

along in this way as though he had a pair of human wings. When a cab

was going along the streets at a sharp trot, he would seize a spoke of

the wheel with one hand and force it to pull up. Nobody ever told him

that he was stupid because they were afraid of his strength, hence his

limitations were scarcely noticed. His redoubtable strength, combined

with a temperate disposition, lent him a majestic dignity which placed

him above the level of an ordinary mortal. He had come to Leipzig from

Mecklenburg in the company of a certain Degelow, who was as powerful

and adroit, though by no means of such gigantic proportions, as his

friend, and whose chief attraction lay in his great vivacity and

animated features, he had led a wild and dissipated life in which play,

drink, passionate love affairs, and constant and prompt duelling had

rung the changes. Ceremonious politeness, an ironic and pedantic

coldness, which testified to bold self-confidence, combined with a very

hot temper, formed the chief characteristics of this personage and

natures akin to his. Degelow’s wildness and passion were lent a curious

diabolical charm by the possession of a malicious humour which he often

turned against himself, whereas towards others he exercised a certain

chivalrous tenderness.

These two extraordinary men were joined by others who possessed all the

qualities essential to a reckless life, together with real and

headstrong valour. One of them, named Stelzer, a regular Berserker out

of the Nibelungenlied, who was nick-named Lope, was in his twentieth

term. While these men openly and consciously belonged to a world doomed

to destruction, and all their actions and escapades could only be

explained by the hypothesis that they all believed that inevitable ruin

was imminent, I made in their company the acquaintance of a certain

Schroter, who particularly attracted me by his cordial disposition,

pleasant Hanoverian accent, and refined wit. He was not one of the

regular young dare-devils, towards whom he adopted a calm observant

attitude, while they were all fond of him and glad to see him. I made a

real friend of this Schroter, although he was much older than I was.

Through him I became acquainted with the works and poems of H. Heine,

and from him I acquired a certain neat and saucy wit, and I was quite

ready to surrender myself to his agreeable influence in the hope of

improving my outward bearing. It was his company in particular that I

sought every day; in the afternoon I generally met him in the Rosenthal

or Kintschy’s Chalet, though always in the presence of those wonderful

Goths who excited at once my alarm and admiration.

They all belonged to university clubs which were on hostile terms with

the one of which I was a member. What this hostility between the

various clubs meant only those can judge who are familiar with the tone

prevalent among them in those days. The mere sight of hostile colours

sufficed to infuriate these men, who otherwise were kind and gentle,

provided they had taken the slightest drop too much. At all events, as

long as the old stagers were sober they would look with good-natured

complacency at a slight young fellow like me in the hostile colours

moving among them so amicably. Those colours I wore in my own peculiar

fashion. I had made use of the brief week during which my club was

still in Leipzig to become the possessor of a splendid ‘Saxon’ cap,

richly embroidered with silver, and worn by a man called Muller, who

was afterwards a prominent constable at Dresden. I had been seized with

such a violent craving for this cap that I managed to buy it from him,

as he wanted money to go home. In spite of this remarkable cap I was,

as I have said, welcome in the den of this band of rowdies: my friend

Schroter saw to that. It was only when the grog, which was the

principal beverage of these wild spirits, began to work that I used to

notice curious glances and overhear doubtful speeches, the significance

of which was for some time hidden from me by the dizziness in which my

own senses were plunged by this baneful drink.

As I was inevitably bound on this account to be mixed up in quarrels

for some time to come, it afforded me a great satisfaction that my

first fight, as a matter of fact, arose from an incident more

creditable to me than those provocations which I had left half

unnoticed. One day Degelow came up to Schroter and me in a wine-bar

that we often frequented, and in quite a friendly manner confessed to

us confidentially his liking for a young and very pretty actress whose

talent Schroter disputed. Degelow rejoined that this was as it might

be, but that, for his part, he regarded the young lady as the most

respectable woman in the theatre. I at once asked him if he considered

my sister’s reputation was not as good. According to students’ notions

it was impossible for Degelow, who doubtless had not the remotest

intention of being insulting, to give me any assurance further than to

say that he certainly did not think my sister had an inferior

reputation, but that, nevertheless, he meant to abide by his assertion

concerning the young lady he had mentioned. Hereupon followed without

delay the usual challenge, opening with the words, ‘You’re an ass,’

which sounded almost ridiculous to my own ears when I said them to this

seasoned swashbuckler.

I remember that Degelow too gasped with astonishment, and lightning

seemed to flash from his eyes; but he controlled himself in the

presence of my friend, and proceeded to observe the usual formalities

of a challenge, and chose broadswords (krumme Sabel) as the weapons for

the fight. The event made a great stir among our companions, but I saw

less reason than before to abstain from my usual intercourse with them.

Only I became more strict about the behaviour of the swashbucklers, and

for several days no evening passed without producing a challenge

between me and some formidable bully, until at last Count Solms, the

only member of my club who had returned to Leipzig as yet, visited me

as though he were an intimate friend and inquired into what had

occurred. He applauded my conduct, but advised me not to wear my

colours until the return of our comrades from the vacation, and to keep

away from the bad company into which I had ventured. Fortunately I had

not long to wait; university life soon began again, and the fencing

ground was filled. The unenviable position, in which, in student

phrase, I was suspended with a half-dozen of the most terrible

swordsmen, earned me a glorious reputation among the ‘freshmen’ and

‘juniors,’ and even among the older ‘champions’ of the Saxonia.

My seconds were duly arranged, the dates for the various duels on hand

settled, and by the care of my seniors the needful time was secured for

me to acquire some sort of skill in fencing. The light heart with which

I awaited the fate which threatened me in at least one of the impending

encounters I myself could not understand at the time; on the other

hand, the way in which that fate preserved me from the consequences of

my rashness seems truly miraculous in my eyes to this day, and, worthy

of further description.

The preparations for a duel included obtaining some experience of these

encounters by being present at several of them. We freshmen attained

this object by what is called ‘carrying duty,’ that is to say, we were

entrusted with the rapiers of the corps (precious weapons of honour

belonging to the association), and had to take them first to the

grinder and thence to the scene of encounter, a proceeding which was

attended with some danger, as it had to be done surreptitiously, since

duelling was forbidden by law; in return we acquired the right of

assisting as spectators at the impending engagements.

When I had earned this honour, the meeting-place chosen for the duel I

was to watch was the billiard-room of an inn in the Burgstrasse; the

table had been moved to one side, and on it the authorised spectators

took their places. Among them I stood up with a beating heart to watch

the dangerous encounters between those doughty champions. I was told on

this occasion of the story of one of my friends (a Jew named Levy, but

known as Lippert), who on this very floor had given so much ground

before his antagonist that the door had to be opened for him, and he

fell back through it down the steps into the street, still believing he

was engaged in the duel. When several bouts had been finished, two men

came on to the ‘pitch,’ Tempel, the president of the Markomanen, and a

certain Wohlfart, an old stager, already in his fourteenth half-year of

study, with whom I also was booked for an encounter later on. When this

was the case, a man was not allowed to watch, in order that the weak

points of the duellist might not be betrayed to his future opponent.

Wohlfart was accordingly asked by my chiefs whether he wanted me

removed; whereupon he replied with calm contempt, ‘Let them leave the

little freshman there, in God’s name!’ Thus I became an eye-witness of

the disablement of a swordsman who nevertheless showed himself so

experienced and skilful on the occasion that I might well have become

alarmed for the issue of my future encounter with him. His gigantic

opponent cut the artery of his right arm, which at once ended the

fight; the surgeon declared that Wohlfart would not be able to hold a

sword again for years, under which circumstances my proposed meeting

with him was at once cancelled. I do not deny that this incident

cheered my soul.

Shortly afterwards the first general reunion of our club was held at

the Green Tap. These gatherings are regular hot-beds for the production

of duels. Here I brought upon myself a new encounter with one Tischer,

but learned at the same time that I had been relieved of two of my most

formidable previous engagements of the kind by the disappearance of my

opponents, both of whom had escaped on account of debt and left no

trace behind them. The only one of whom I could hear anything was the

terrible Stelzer, surnamed Lope. This fellow had taken advantage of the

passing of Polish refugees, who had at that time already been driven

over the frontier and were making their way through Germany to France,

to disguise himself as an ill-starred champion of freedom, and he

subsequently found his way to the Foreign Legion in Algeria. On the way

home from the gathering, Degelow, whom I was to meet in a few weeks,

proposed a ‘truce.’ This was a device which, if it was accepted, as it

was in this case, enabled the future combatants to entertain and talk

to one another, which was otherwise most strictly forbidden. We

wandered back to the town arm-in-arm; with chivalrous tenderness my

interesting and formidable opponent declared that he was delighted at

the prospect of crossing swords with me in a few weeks’ time; that he

regarded it as an honour and a pleasure, as he was fond of me and

respected me for my valorous conduct. Seldom has any personal success

flattered me more. We embraced, and amid protestations which, owing to

a certain dignity about them, acquired a significance I can never

forget, we parted. He informed me that he must first pay a visit to

Jena, where he had an appointment to fight a duel. A week later the

news of his death reached Leipzig; he had been mortally wounded in the

duel at Jena.

I felt as if I were living in a dream, out of which I was aroused by

the announcement of my encounter with Tischer. Though he was a

first-rate and vigorous fighter, he had been chosen by our chiefs for

my first passage of arms because he was fairly short. In spite of being

unable to feel any great confidence in my hastily acquired and little

practised skill in fencing, I looked forward to this my first duel with

a light heart. Although it was against the rules, I never dreamed of

telling the authorities that I was suffering from a slight rash which I

had caught at that time, and which I was informed made wounds so

dangerous that if it were reported it would postpone the meeting, in

spite of the fact that I was modest enough to be prepared for wounds. I

was sent for at ten in the morning, and left home smiling to think what

my mother and sisters would say if in a few hours I were brought back

in the alarming state I anticipated. My chief, Herr v. Schonfeld, was a

pleasant, quiet sort of man, who lived on the marsh. When I reached his

house, he leant out of the window with his pipe in his mouth, and

greeted me with the words: ‘You can go home, my lad, it is all off;

Tischer is in hospital.’ When I got upstairs I found several ‘leading

men’ assembled, from whom I learned that Tischer had got very drunk the

night before, and had in consequence laid himself open to the most

outrageous treatment by the inhabitants of a house of ill-fame. He was

terribly hurt, and had been taken by the police in the first instance

to the hospital. This inevitably meant rustication, and, above all,

expulsion from the academic association to which he belonged.

I cannot clearly recall the incidents that removed from Leipzig the few

remaining fire-eaters to whom I had pledged myself since that fatal

vacation-time; I only know that this aide of my fame as a student

yielded to another. We celebrated the ‘freshmen’s gathering,’ to which

all those who could manage it drove a four-in-hand in a long procession

through the town. After the president of the club had profoundly moved

me with his sudden and yet prolonged solemnity, I conceived the desire

to be among the very last to return home from the outing. Accordingly I

stayed away three days and three nights, and spent the time chiefly in

gambling, a pastime which from the first night of our festivity cast

its devilish snares around me. Some half-dozen of the smartest club

members chanced to be together at early dawn in the Jolly Peasant, and

forthwith formed the nucleus of a gambling club, which was reinforced

during the day by recruits coming back from the town. Members came to

see whether we were still at it, members also went away, but I with the

original six held out for days and nights without faltering.

The desire that first prompted me to take part in the play was the wish

to win enough for my score (two thalers): this I succeeded in doing,

and thereupon I was inspired with the hope of being able to settle all

the debts I had made at that time by my winnings at play. Just as I had

hoped to learn composition most quickly by Logier’s method, but had

found myself hampered in my object for a long period by unexpected

difficulties, so my plan for speedily improving my financial position

was likewise doomed to disappointment. To win was not such an easy

matter, and for some three months I was such a victim to the rage for

gambling that no other passion was able to exercise the slightest

influence over my mind.

Neither the Fechtboden (where the students’ fights were practised), nor

the beer-house, nor the actual scene of the fights, ever saw my face

again. In my lamentable position I racked my brains all day to devise

ways and means of getting the money wherewith to gamble at night. In

vain did my poor mother try everything in her power to induce me not to

come home so late at night, although she had no idea of the real nature

of my debauches: after I had left the house in the afternoon I never

returned till dawn the next day, and I reached my room (which was at

some distance from the others) by climbing over the gate, for my mother

had refused to give me a latch-key.

In despair over my ill-luck, my passion for gambling grew into a

veritable mania, and I no longer felt any inclination for those things

which at one time had lured me to student life. I became absolutely

indifferent to the opinion of my former companions and avoided them

entirely; I now lost myself in the smaller gambling dens of Leipzig,

where only the very scum of the students congregated. Insensible to any

feeling of self-respect, I bore even the contempt of my sister Rosalie;

both she and my mother hardly ever deigning to cast a glance at the

young libertine whom they only saw at rare intervals, looking deadly

pale and worn out: my ever-growing despair made me at last resort to

foolhardiness as the only means of forcing hostile fate to my side. It

suddenly struck me that only by dint of big stakes could I make big

profits. To this end I decided to make use of my mother’s pension, of

which I was trustee of a fairly large sum. That night I lost everything

I had with me except one thaler: the excitement with which I staked

that last coin on a card was an experience hitherto quite strange to my

young life. As I had had nothing to eat, I was obliged repeatedly to

leave the gambling table owing to sickness. With this last thaler I

staked my life, for my return to my home was, of course, out of the

question. Already I saw myself in the grey dawn, a prodigal son,

fleeing from all I held dear, through forest and field towards the

unknown. My mood of despair had gained so strong a hold upon me that,

when my card won, I immediately placed all the money on a fresh stake,

and repeated this experiment until I had won quite a considerable

amount. From that moment my luck grew continuously. I gained such

confidence that I risked the most hazardous stakes: for suddenly it

dawned upon me that this was destined to be my last day with the cards.

My good fortune now became so obvious that the bank thought it wise to

close. Not only had I won back all the money I had lost, but I had won

enough to pay off all my debts as well. My sensations during the whole

of this process were of the most sacred nature: I felt as if God and

His angels were standing by my side and were whispering words of

warning and of consolation into my ears.

Once more I climbed over the gate of my home in the early hours of the

morning, this time to sleep peacefully and soundly and to awake very

late, strengthened and as though born again.

No sense of shame deterred me from telling my mother, to whom I

presented her money, the whole truth about this decisive night. I

voluntarily confessed my sin in having utilised her pension, sparing no

detail. She folded her hands and thanked God for His mercy, and

forthwith regarded me as saved, believing it impossible for me ever to

commit such a crime again.

And, truth to tell, gambling had lost all fascination for me from that

moment. The world, in which I had moved like one demented, suddenly

seemed stripped of all interest or attraction. My rage for gambling had

already made me quite indifferent to the usual student’s vanities, and

when I was freed from this passion also, I suddenly found myself face

to face with an entirely new world.

To this world I belonged henceforth: it was the world of real and

serious musical study, to which I now devoted myself heart and soul.

Even during this wild period of my life, my musical development had not

been entirely at a standstill; on the contrary, it daily became plainer

that music was the only direction towards which my mental tendencies

had a marked bent. Only I had got quite out of the habit of musical

study. Even now it seems incredible that I managed to find time in

those days to finish quite a substantial amount of composition. I have

but the faintest recollection of an Overture in C major (6/8 time), and

of a Sonata in B flat major arranged as a duet; the latter pleased my

sister Ottilie, who played it with me, so much that I arranged it for

orchestra. But another work of this period, an Overture in B flat

major, left an indelible impression on my mind on account of an

incident connected with it. This composition, in fact, was the outcome

of my study of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony in about the same degree as

Leubald und Adelaïde was the result of my study of Shakespeare. I had

made a special point of bringing out the mystic meaning in the

orchestra, which I divided into three distinctly different and opposite

elements. I wanted to make the characteristic nature of these elements

clear to the score reader the moment he looked at it by a striking

display of colour, and only the fact that I could not get any green ink

made this picturesque idea impossible. I employed black ink for the

brass instruments alone, the strings were to have red and the wind

green ink. This extraordinary score I gave for perusal to Heinrich

Dorn, who was at that time musical director of the Leipzig theatre. He

was very young, and impressed me as being a very clever musician and a

witty man of the world, whom the Leipzig public made much of.

Nevertheless, I have never been able to understand how he could have

granted my request to produce this overture.

Some time afterwards I was rather inclined to believe with others, who

knew how much he enjoyed a good joke, that he intended to treat himself

to a little fun. At the time, however, he vowed that he thought the

work interesting, and maintained that if it were only brought out as a

hitherto unknown work by Beethoven, the public would receive it with

respect, though without understanding.

It was the Christmas of the fateful year 1830; as usual, there would be

no performance at the theatre on Christmas Eve, but instead a concert

for the poor had been organised, which received but scant support. The

first item on the programme was called by the exciting title ‘New

Overture’—nothing more! I had surreptitiously listened to the rehearsal

with some misgiving. I was very much impressed by the coolness with

which Dorn fenced with the apparent confusion which the members of the

orchestra showed with regard to this mysterious composition. The

principal theme of the Allegro was contained in four bars; after every

fourth bar, however, a fifth bar had been inserted, which had nothing

to do with the melody, and which was announced by a loud bang on the

kettle-drum on the second beat. As this drum-beat stood out alone, the

drummer, who continually thought he was making a mistake, got confused,

and did not give the right sharpness to the accent as prescribed by the

score. Listening from my hidden corner, and frightened at my original

intention, this accidentally different rendering did not displease me.

To my genuine annoyance, however, Dorn called the drummer to the front

and insisted on his playing the accents with the prescribed sharpness.

When, after the rehearsal, I told the musical director of my misgivings

about this important fact, I could not get him to promise a milder

interpretation of the fatal drum-beat; he stuck to it that the thing

would sound very well as it was. In spite of this assurance my

restlessness grew, and I had not the courage to introduce myself to my

friends in advance as the author of the ‘New Overture.’

My sister Ottilie, who had already been forced to survive the secret

readings of Leubald und Adelaïde, was the only person willing to come

with me to hear my work. It was Christmas Eve, and there was to be the

usual Christmas tree, presents, etc., at my brother-in-law’s, Friedrich

Brockhaus, and both of us naturally wanted to be there. My sister, in

particular, who lived there, had a good deal to do with the

arrangements, and could only get away for a short while, and that with

great difficulty; our amiable relation accordingly had the carriage

ready for her so that she might get back more quickly. I made use of

this opportunity to inaugurate, as it were, my entree into the musical

world in a festive manner. The carriage drew up in front of the

theatre. Ottilie went into my brother-in-law’s box, which forced me to

try and find a seat in the pit. I had forgotten to buy a ticket, and

was refused admission by the man at the door. Suddenly the tuning up of

the orchestra grew louder and louder, and I thought I should have to

miss the beginning of my work. In my anxiety I revealed myself to the

man at the door as the composer of the ‘New Overture,’ and in this way

succeeded in passing without a ticket. I pushed my way through to one

of the first rows of the pit, and sat down in terrible anxiety.

The Overture began: after the theme of the ‘black’ brass instruments

had made itself heard with great emphasis, the ‘red’ Allegro theme

started, in which, as I have already mentioned, every fifth bar was

interrupted by the drum-beat from the ‘black’ world. What kind of

effect the ‘green’ theme of the wind instruments, which joined in

afterwards, produced upon the listeners, and what they must have

thought when ‘black,’ ‘red,’ and ‘green’ themes became intermingled,

has always remained a mystery to me, for the fatal drum-beat, brutally

hammered out, entirely deprived me of my senses, especially as this

prolonged and continually recurring effect now began to rouse, not only

the attention, but the merriment of the audience. I heard my neighbours

calculating the return of this effect; knowing the absolute correctness

of their calculation, I suffered ten thousand torments, and became

almost unconscious. At last I awoke from my nightmare when the

Overture, to which I had disdained to give what I considered a trite

ending, came to a standstill most unexpectedly.

No phantoms like those in Hoffmann’s Tales could have succeeded in

producing the extraordinary state in which I came to my senses on

noticing the astonishment of the audience at the end of the

performance. I heard no exclamations of disapproval, no hissing, no

remarks, not even laughter; all I saw was intense astonishment at such

a strange occurrence, which impressed them, as it did me, like a

horrible nightmare. The worst moment, however, came when I had to leave

the pit and take my sister home. To get up and pass through the people

in the pit was horrible indeed. Nothing, however, equalled the pain of

coming face to face with the man at the door; the strange look he gave

me haunted me ever afterwards, and for a considerable time I avoided

the pit of the Leipzig theatre.

My next step was to find my sister, who had gone through the whole sad

experience with infinite pity; in silence we drove home to be present

at a brilliant family festivity, which contrasted with grim irony with

the gloom of my bewilderment.

In spite of it all I tried to believe in myself, and thought I could

find comfort in my overture to the Braut von Messina, which I believed

to be a better work than the fatal one I had just heard. A

reinstatement, however, was out of the question, for the directors of

the Leipzig theatre regarded me for a long time as a very doubtful

person, in spite of Dorn’s friendship. It is true that I still tried my

hand at sketching out compositions to Goethe’s Faust, some of which

have been preserved to this day: but soon my wild student’s life

resumed its sway and drowned the last remnant of serious musical study

in me.

I now began to imagine that because I had become a student I ought to

attend the University lectures. From Traugott Krug, who was well known

to me on account of his having suppressed the student’s revolt, I tried

to learn the first principles of philosophy; a single lesson sufficed

to make me give this up. Two or three times, however, I attended the

lectures on aesthetics given by one of the younger professors, a man

called Weiss. This perseverance was due to the interest which Weiss

immediately aroused in me. When I made his acquaintance at my uncle

Adolph’s house, Weiss had just translated the metaphysics of Aristotle,

and, if I am not mistaken, dedicated them in a controversial spirit to

Hegel.

On this occasion I had listened to the conversation of these two men on

philosophy and philosophers, which made a tremendous impression on me.

I remember that Weiss was an absent-minded man, with a hasty and abrupt

manner of speaking; he had an interesting and pensive expression which

impressed me immensely. I recollect how, on being accused of a want of

clearness in his writing and style, he justified himself by saying that

the deep problems of the human mind could not in any case be solved by

the mob. This maxim, which struck me as being very plausible, I at once

accepted as the principle for all my future writing. I remember that my

eldest brother Albert, to whom I once had to write for my mother, grew

so disgusted with my letter and style that he said he thought I must be

going mad.

In spite of my hopes that Weiss’s lectures would do me much good, I was

not capable of continuing to attend them, as my desires in those days

drove me to anything but the study of aesthetics. Nevertheless, my

mother’s anxiety at this time on my behalf made me try to take up music

again. As Muller, the teacher under whom I had studied till that time,

had not been able to inspire me with a permanent love of study, it was

necessary to discover whether another teacher might not be better able

to induce me to do serious work.

Theodor Weinlich, who was choirmaster and musical director at St.

Thomas’s Church, held at that time this important and ancient post

which was afterwards occupied by Schicht, and before him by no less a

person than Sebastian Bach. By education he belonged to the old Italian

school of music, and had studied in Bologna under Pater Martini. He had

made a name for himself in this art by his vocal compositions, in which

his fine manner of treating the parts was much praised. He himself told

me one day that a Leipzig publisher had offered him a very substantial

fee if he would write for his firm another book of vocal exercises

similar to the one which had proved so profitable to his first

publisher. Weinlich told him that he had not got any exercises of the

kind ready at the moment, but offered him instead a new Mass, which the

publisher refused with the words: ‘Let him who got the meat gnaw the

bones.’ The modesty with which Weinlich told me this little story

showed how excellent a man he was. As he was in a very bad and weak

state of health when my mother introduced me to him, he at first

refused to take me as a pupil. But, after having resisted all

persuasions, he at last took pity on my musical education, which, as he

soon discovered from a fugue which I had brought with me, was

exceedingly faulty. He accordingly promised to teach me, on condition

that I should give up all attempts at composing for six months, and

follow his instructions implicitly. To the first part of my promise I

remained faithful, thanks to the vast vortex of dissipation into which

my life as a student had drawn me.

When, however, I had to occupy myself for any length of time with

nothing but four-part harmony exercises in strictly rigorous style, it

was not only the student in me, but also the composer of so many

overtures and sonatas, that was thoroughly disgusted. Weinlich, too,

had his grievances against me, and decided to give me up.

During this period I came to the crisis of my life, which led to the

catastrophe of that terrible evening at the gambling den. But an even

greater blow than this fearful experience awaited me when Weinlich

decided not to have anything more to do with me. Deeply humiliated and

miserable, I besought the gentle old man, whom I loved dearly, to

forgive me, and I promised him from that moment to work with unflagging

energy. One morning at seven o’clock Weinlich sent for me to begin the

rough sketch for a fugue; he devoted the whole morning to me, following

my work bar by bar with the greatest attention, and giving me his

valuable advice. At twelve o’clock he dismissed me with the instruction

to perfect and finish the sketch by filling in the remaining parts at

home.

When I brought him the fugue finished, he handed me his own treatment

of the same theme for comparison. This common task of fugue writing

established between me and my good-natured teacher the tenderest of

ties, for, from that moment, we both enjoyed the lessons. I was

astonished how quickly the time flew. In eight weeks I had not only

gone through a number of the most intricate fugues, but had also waded

through all kinds of difficult evolutions in counterpoint, when one

day, on bringing him an extremely elaborate double fugue, he took my

breath away by telling me that after this there was nothing left for

him to teach me.

As I was not aware of any great effort on my part, I often wondered

whether I had really become a well-equipped musician. Weinlich himself

did not seem to attach much importance to what he had taught me: he

said, ‘Probably you will never write fugues or canons; but what you

have mastered is Independence: you can now stand alone and rely upon

having a fine technique at your fingers’ ends if you should want it.’

The principal result of his influence over me was certainly the growing

love of clearness and fluency to which he had trained me. I had already

had to write the above-mentioned fugue for ordinary voices; my feeling

for the melodious and vocal had in this way been awakened. In order to

keep me strictly under his calming and friendly influence, he had at

the same time given me a sonata to write which, as a proof of my

friendship for him, I had to build up on strictly harmonic and thematic

lines, for which he recommended me a very early and childlike sonata by

Pleyel as a model.

Those who had only recently heard my Overture must, indeed, have

wondered how I ever wrote this sonata, which has been published through

the indiscretion of Messrs. Breitkopf and Hartel (to reward me for my

abstemiousness, Weinlich induced them to publish this poor

composition). From that moment he gave me a free hand. To begin with I

was allowed to compose a Fantasia for the pianoforte (in F sharp minor)

which I wrote in a quite informal style by treating the melody in

recitative form; this gave me intense satisfaction because it won me

praise from Weinlich.

Soon afterwards I wrote three overtures which all met with his entire

approval. In the following winter (1831-1832) I succeeded in getting

the first of them, in D minor, performed at one of the Gewandhaus

concerts.

At that time a very simple and homely tone reigned supreme in this

institution. The instrumental works were not conducted by what we call

‘a conductor of the orchestra,’ but were simply played to the audience

by the leader of the orchestra. As soon as the singing began, Pohlenz

took his place at the conductor’s desk; he belonged to the type of fat

and pleasant musical directors, and was a great favourite with the

Leipzig public. He used to come on the platform with a very

important-looking blue baton in his hand.

One of the strangest events which occurred at that time was the yearly

production of the Ninth Symphony of Beethoven; after the first three

movements had been played straight through like a Haydn symphony, as

well as the orchestra could manage it, Pohlenz, instead of having to

conduct a vocal quartette, a cantata, or an Italian aria, took his

place at the desk to undertake this highly complicated instrumental

work, with its particularly enigmatical and incoherent opening, one of

the most difficult tasks that could possibly be found for a musical

conductor. I shall never forget the impression produced upon me at the

first rehearsal by the anxiously and carefully played 3/4 time, and the

way in which the wild shrieks of the trumpet (with which this movement

begins) resulted in the most extraordinary confusion of sound.

He had evidently chosen this tempo in order, in some way, to manage the

recitative of the double basses; but it was utterly hopeless. Pohlenz

was in a bath of perspiration, the recitative did not come off, and I

really began to think that Beethoven must have written nonsense; the

double bass player, Temmler, a faithful veteran of the orchestra,

prevailed upon Pohlenz at last, in rather coarse and energetic

language, to put down the baton, and in this way the recitative really

proceeded properly. All the same, I felt at this time that I had come

to the humble conclusion, in a way I can hardly explain, that this

extraordinary work was still beyond my comprehension. For a long time I

gave up brooding over this composition, and I turned my thoughts with

simple longing towards a clearer and calmer musical form.

My study of counterpoint had taught me to appreciate, above all,

Mozart’s light and flowing treatment of the most difficult technical

problems, and the last movement of his great Symphony in C major in

particular served me as example for my own work. My D minor Overture,

which clearly showed the influence of Beethoven’s Coriolanus Overture,

had been favourably received by the public; my mother began to have

faith in me again, and I started at once on a second overture (in C

major), which really ended with a ‘Fugato’ that did more credit to my

new model than I had ever hoped to accomplish.

This overture, also, was soon afterwards performed at a recital given

by the favourite singer, Mlle. Palazzesi (of the Dresden Italian

Opera). Before this I had already introduced it at a concert given by a

private musical society called ‘Euterpe’, when I had conducted it

myself.

I remember the strange impression I received from a remark that my

mother made on that occasion; as a matter of fact this work, which was

written in a counterpoint style, without any real passion or emotion,

had produced a strange effect upon her. She gave vent to her

astonishment by warmly praising the Egmont Overture, which was played

at the same concert, maintaining that ‘this kind of music was after all

more fascinating than any stupid fugue.’

At this time I also wrote (as my third opus) an overture to Raupach’s

drama, Konig Enzio, in which again Beethoven’s influence made itself

even more strongly felt. My sister Rosalie succeeded in getting it

performed at the theatre before the play; for the sake of prudence they

did not announce it on the programme the first time. Dorn conducted it,

and as the performance went off all right, and the public showed no

dissatisfaction, my overture was played with my full name on the

programme several times during the run of the above-mentioned drama.

After this I tried my hand at a big Symphony (in C major); in this work

I showed what I had learnt by using the influence of my study of

Beethoven and Mozart towards the achievement of a really pleasant and

intelligible work, in which the fugue was again present at the end,

while the themes of the various movements were so constructed that they

could be played consecutively.

Nevertheless, the passionate and bold element of the Sinfonia Eroica

was distinctly discernible, especially in the first movement. The slow

movement, on the contrary, contained reminiscences of my former musical

mysticism. A kind of repeated interrogative exclamation of the minor

third merging into the fifth connected in my mind this work (which I

had finished with the utmost effort at clearness) with my very earliest

period of boyish sentimentality.

When, in the following year, I called on Friedrich Rochlitz, at that

time the ‘Nestor’ of the musical aesthetes in Leipzig, and president of

the Gewandhaus, I prevailed upon him to promise me a performance of my

work. As he had been given my score for perusal before seeing me, he

was quite astonished to find that I was a very young man, for the

character of my music had prepared him to see a much older and more

experienced musician. Before this performance took place many things

happened which I must first mention, as they were of great importance

to my life.

My short and stormy career as a student had drowned in me not only all

longing for further development, but also all interest in intellectual

and spiritual pursuits. Although, as I have pointed out, I had never

alienated myself entirely from music, my revived interest in politics

aroused my first real disgust for my senseless student’s life, which

soon left no deeper traces on my mind than the remembrance of a

terrible nightmare.

The Polish War of Independence against Russian supremacy filled me with

growing enthusiasm. The victories which the Poles obtained for a short

period during May, 1831, aroused my enthusiastic admiration: it seemed

to me as though the world had, by some miracle, been created anew. As a

contrast to this, the news of the battle of Ostrolenka made it appear

as if the end of the world had come. To my astonishment, my boon

companions scoffed at me when I commented upon some of these events;

the terrible lack of all fellow-feeling and comradeship amongst the

students struck me very forcibly. Any kind of enthusiasm had to be

smothered or turned into pedantic bravado, which showed itself in the

form of affectation and indifference. To get drunk with deliberate

cold-bloodedness, without even a glimpse of humour, was reckoned almost

as brave a feat as duelling. Not until much later did I understand the

far nobler spirit which animated the lower classes in Germany in

comparison with the sadly degenerate state of the University students.

In those days I felt terribly indignant at the insulting remarks which

I brought upon myself when I deplored the battle of Ostrolenka.

To my honour be it said, that these and similar impressions helped to

make me give up my low associates. During my studies with Weinlich the

only little dissipation I allowed myself was my daily evening visit to

Kintschy, the confectioner in the Klostergasse, where I passionately

devoured the latest newspapers. Here I found many men who held the same

political views as myself, and I specially loved to listen to the eager

political discussions of some of the old men who frequented the place.

The literary journals, too, began to interest me; I read a great deal,

but was not very particular in my choice. Nevertheless, I now began to

appreciate intelligence and wit, whereas before only the grotesque and

the fantastic had had any attraction for me.

My interest in the issue of the Polish war, however, remained

paramount. I felt the siege and capture of Warsaw as a personal

calamity. My excitement when the remains of the Polish army began to

pass through Leipzig on their way to France was indescribable, and I

shall never forget the impression produced upon me by the first batch

of these unfortunate soldiers on the occasion of their being quartered

at the Green Shield, a public-house in the Meat Market. Much as this

depressed me, I was soon roused to a high pitch of enthusiasm, for in

the lounge of the Leipzig Gewandhaus, where that night Beethoven’s C

minor Symphony was being played, a group of heroic figures, the

principal leaders of the Polish revolution, excited my admiration. I

felt more particularly attracted by Count Vincenz Tyszkiewitcz, a man

of exceptionally powerful physique and noble appearance, who impressed

me by his dignified and aristocratic manner and his quiet

self-reliance—qualities with which I had not met before. When I saw a

man of such kingly bearing in a tight-fitting coat and red velvet cap,

I at once realised my foolishness in ever having worshipped the

ludicrously dressed up little heroes of our students’ world. I was

delighted to meet this gentleman again at the house of my

brother-in-law, Friedrich Brockhaus, where I saw him frequently.

My brother-in-law had the greatest pity and sympathy for the Polish

rebels, and was the president of a committee whose task it was to look

after their interests, and for a long time he made many personal

sacrifices for their cause.

The Brockhaus establishment now became tremendously attractive to me.

Around Count Vincenz Tyszkiewitcz, who remained the lodestar of this

small Polish world, gathered a great many other wealthy exiles, amongst

whom I chiefly remember a cavalry captain of the name of Bansemer, a

man of unlimited kindness, but of a rather frivolous nature; he

possessed a marvellous team of four horses which he drove at such

breakneck speed as to cause great annoyance to the people of Leipzig.

Another man of importance with whom I remember dining was General Bem,

whose artillery had made such a gallant stand at Ostrolenka.

Many other exiles passed through this hospitable house, some of whom

impressed us by their melancholy, warlike bearing, others by their

refined behaviour. Vincenz Tyszkiewitcz, however, remained my ideal of

a true man, and I loved him with a profound adoration. He, too, began

to be interested in me; I used to call upon him nearly every day, and

was sometimes present at a sort of martial feast, from which he often

withdrew in order to be able to open his heart to me about the

anxieties which oppressed him. He had, in fact, received absolutely no

news of the whereabouts of his wife and little son since they separated

at Volhynien. Besides this, he was under the shadow of a great sorrow

which drew all sympathetic natures to him. To my sister Louise he had

confided the terrible calamity that had once befallen him. He had been

married before, and while staying with his wife in one of his lonely

castles, in the dead of night he had seen a ghostly apparition at the

window of his bedroom. Hearing his name called several times, he had

taken up a revolver to protect himself from possible danger, and had

shot his own wife, who had had the eccentric idea of teasing him by

pretending to be a ghost. I had the pleasure of sharing his joy on

hearing that his family was safe. His wife joined him in Leipzig with

their beautiful boy, Janusz. I felt sorry not to be able to feel the

same sympathy for this lady as I did for her husband; perhaps one of

the reasons of my antipathy was the obvious and conspicuous way in

which she made herself up, by means of which the poor woman probably

tried to hide how much her beauty had suffered through the terrible

strain of the past events. She soon went back to Galicia to try and

save what she could of their property, and also to provide her husband

with a pass from the Austrian Government, by means of which he could

follow her.

Then came the third of May. Eighteen of the Poles who were still in

Leipzig met together at a festive dinner in a hotel outside the town;

on this day was to be celebrated the first anniversary of the third of

May, so dear to the memory of the Poles. Only the chiefs of the Leipzig

Polish Committee received invitations, and as a special favour I also

was asked. I shall never forget that occasion. The dinner became an

orgy; throughout the evening a brass band from the town played Polish

folksongs, and these were sung by the whole company, led by a

Lithuanian called Zan, in a manner now triumphant and now mournful. The

beautiful ‘Third of May’ song more particularly drew forth a positive

uproar of enthusiasm. Tears and shouts of joy grew into a terrible

tumult; the excited men grouped themselves on the grass swearing

eternal friendship in the most extravagant terms, for which the word

‘Oiczisna’ (Fatherland) provided the principal theme, until at last

night threw her veil over this wild debauch.

That evening afterwards served me as the theme for an orchestral

composition (in the form of an overture) named Polonia; I shall recount

the fate of this work later on. My friend Tyszkiewitcz’s passport now

arrived, and he made up his mind to go back to Galicia via Brunn,

although his friends considered it was very rash of him to do so. I

very much wanted to see something of the world, and Tyszkiewitcz’s

offer to take me with him, induced my mother to consent to my going to

Vienna, a place that I had long wished to visit. I took with me the

scores of my three overtures which had already been performed, and also

that of my great symphony as yet unproduced, and had a grand time with

my Polish patron, who took me in his luxurious travelling-coach as far

as the capital of Moravia. During a short stop at Dresden the exiles of

all classes gave our beloved Count a friendly farewell dinner in Pirna,

at which the champagne flowed freely, while the health was drunk of the

future ‘Dictator of Poland.’

At last we separated at Brunn, from which place I continued my journey

to Vienna by coach. During the afternoon and night, which I was obliged

to spend in Brunn by myself, I went through terrible agonies from fear

of the cholera which, as I unexpectedly heard, had broken out in this

place. There I was all alone in a strange place, my faithful friend

just departed, and on hearing of the epidemic I felt as if a malicious

demon had caught me in his snare in order to annihilate me. I did not

betray my terror to the people in the hotel, but when I was shown into

a very lonely wing of the house and left by myself in this wilderness,

I hid myself in bed with my clothes on, and lived once again through

all the horrors of ghost stories as I had done in my boyhood. The

cholera stood before me like a living thing; I could see and touch it;

it lay in my bed and embraced me. My limbs turned to ice, I felt frozen

to the very marrow. Whether I was awake or asleep I never knew; I only

remember how astonished I was when, on awakening, I felt thoroughly

well and healthy.

At last I arrived in Vienna, where I escaped the epidemic which had

penetrated as far as that town. It was midsummer of the year 1832.

Owing to the introductions I had with me, I found myself very much at

home in this lively city, in which I made a pleasant stay of six weeks.

As my sojourn, however, had no really practical purpose, my mother

looked upon the cost of this holiday, short as it seemed, as an

unnecessary extravagance on my part. I visited the theatres, heard

Strauss, made excursions, and altogether had a very good time. I am

afraid I contracted a few debts as well, which I paid off later on when

I was conductor of the Dresden orchestra. I had received very pleasant

impressions of musical and theatrical life, and for a long time Vienna

lived in my memory as the acme of that extraordinarily productive

spirit peculiar to its people. I enjoyed most of all the performances

at the Theater an der Wien, at which they were acting a grotesque fairy

play called Die Abenteuer Fortunat’s zu Wasser und zu Land, in which a

cab was called on the shores of the Black Sea and which made a

tremendous impression on me. About the music I was more doubtful. A

young friend of mine took me with immense pride to a performance of

Gluck’s Iphigenia in Tauris, which was made doubly attractive by a

first-rate cast including Wild, Staudigl and Binder: I must confess

that on the whole I was bored by this work, but I did not dare say so.

My ideas of Gluck had attained gigantic proportions from my reading of

Hoffmann’s well-known Phantasies; my anticipation of this work

therefore, which I had not studied yet, had led me to expect a

treatment full of overpowering dramatic force. It is possible that

Schroder-Devrient’s acting in Fidelio had taught me to judge everything

by her exalted standard.

With the greatest trouble I worked myself up to some kind of enthusiasm

for the great scene between Orestes and the Furies. I hoped against

hope that I should be able to admire the remainder of the opera. I

began to understand the Viennese taste, however, when I saw how great a

favourite the opera Zampa became with the public, both at the Karnthner

Thor and at the Josephstadt. Both theatres competed vigorously in the

production of this popular work, and although the public had seemed mad

about Iphigenia, nothing equalled their enthusiasm for Zampa. No sooner

had they left the Josephstadt Theatre in the greatest ecstasies about

Zampa than they proceeded to the public-house called the Strausslein.

Here they were immediately greeted by the strains of selections from

Zampa which drove the audience to feverish excitement. I shall never

forget the extraordinary playing of Johann Strauss, who put equal

enthusiasm into everything he played, and very often made the audience

almost frantic with delight.

At the beginning of a new waltz this demon of the Viennese musical

spirit shook like a Pythian priestess on the tripod, and veritable

groans of ecstasy (which, without doubt, were more due to his music

than to the drinks in which the audience had indulged) raised their

worship for the magic violinist to almost bewildering heights of

frenzy.

The hot summer air of Vienna was absolutely impregnated with Zampa and

Strauss. A very poor students’ rehearsal at the Conservatoire, at which

they performed a Mass by Cherubini, seemed to me like an alms paid

begrudgingly to the study of classical music. At the same rehearsal one

of the professors, to whom I was introduced, tried to make the students

play my Overture in D minor (the one already performed in Leipzig). I

do not know what his opinion was, nor that of the students, with regard

to this attempt; I only know they soon gave it up.

On the whole I had wandered into doubtful musical bypaths; and I now

withdrew from this first educational visit to a great European art

centre in order to start on a cheap, but long and monotonous return

journey to Bohemia, by stage-coach. My next move was a visit to the

house of Count Pachta, of whom I had pleasant recollections from my

boyhood days. His estate, Pravonin, was about eight miles from Prague.

Received in the kindest possible way by the old gentleman and his

beautiful daughters, I enjoyed his delightful hospitality until late

into the autumn. A youth of nineteen, as I then was, with a

fast-growing beard (for which my sisters had already prepared the young

ladies by letter), the continual and close intimacy with such kind and

pretty girls could hardly fail to make a strong impression on my

imagination. Jenny, the elder of the two, was slim, with black hair,

blue eyes, and wonderfully noble features; the younger one, Auguste,

was a little smaller, and stouter, with a magnificent complexion, fair

hair, and brown eyes. The natural and sisterly manner with which both

girls treated me and conversed with me did not blind me to the fact

that I was expected to fall in love with one or the other of them. It

amused them to see how embarrassed I got in my efforts to choose

between them, and consequently they teased me tremendously.

Unfortunately, I did not act judiciously with regard to the daughters

of my host: in spite of their homely education, they belonged to a very

aristocratic house, and consequently hesitated between the hope of

marrying men of eminent position in their own sphere, and the necessity

of choosing husbands amongst the higher middle classes, who could

afford to keep them in comfort. The shockingly poor, almost mediaeval,

education of the Austrian so-called cavalier, made me rather despise

the latter; the girls, too, had suffered from the same lack of proper

training. I soon noticed with disgust how little they knew about things

artistic, and how much value they attached to superficial things.

However much I might try to interest them in those higher pursuits

which had become necessary to me, they were incapable of appreciating

them. I advocated a complete change from the bad library novels, which

represented their only reading, from the Italian operatic arias, sung

by Auguste, and, last but not least, from the horsy, insipid cavaliers,

who paid their court to both Jenny and her sister in the most coarse

and offensive manner. My zeal in this latter respect soon gave rise to

great unpleasantness. I became hard and insulting, harangued them about

the French Revolution, and begged them with fatherly admonitions ‘for

the love of heaven’ to be content with well-educated middle-class men,

and give up those impertinent suitors who could only harm their

reputation. The indignation provoked by my friendly advice I often had

to ward off with the harshest retorts. I never apologised, but tried by

dint of real or feigned jealousy to get our friendship back on the old

footing. In this way, undecided, half in love and half angry, one cold

November day I said good-bye to these pretty children. I soon met the

whole family again at Prague, where I made a long sojourn, without,

however, staying at the Count’s residence.

My stay at Prague was to be of great musical importance to me. I knew

the director of the Conservatoire, Dionys Weber, who promised to bring

my symphony before the public; I also spent much of my time with an

actor called Moritz, to whom, as an old friend of our family, I had

been recommended, and there I made the acquaintance of the young

musician Kittl.

Moritz, who noticed that not a day passed but what I went to the

much-feared chief of the Conservatoire upon some pressing musical

business, once despatched me with an improvised parody on Schiller’s

Burgschaft:—

Zu Dionys dem Direktor schlich

Wagner, die Partitur im Gewande;

Ihn schlugen die Schuler im Bande:

‘Was wolltest du mit den Noten sprich?’

Entgegnet ihm finster der Wutherich:

‘Die Stadt vom schlechten Geschmacke befreien!

Das sollst du in den Rezensionen bereuen.’[5]

[5] To Dionys, the Director,

crept Wagner, the score in his pocket;

The students arrested him forthwith:

‘What do’st thou with that music, say?’

Thus asked him the angry tyrant:

‘To free the town from taste too vile!

For this the critics will make thee suffer.’

Truly I had to deal with a kind of ‘Dionysius the Tyrant.’ A man who

did not acknowledge Beethoven’s genius beyond his Second Symphony, a

man who looked upon the Eroica as the acme of bad taste on the master’s

part; who praised Mozart alone, and next to him tolerated only

Lindpaintner: such a man was not easy to approach, and I had to learn

the art of making use of tyrants for one’s own purposes. I

dissimulated; I pretended to be struck by the novelty of his ideas,

never contradicted him, and, to point out the similarity of our

standpoints, I referred him to the end fugue in my Overture and in my

Symphony (both in C major), which I had only succeeded in making what

they were through having studied Mozart. My reward soon followed:

Dionys set to work to study my orchestral creations with almost

youthful energy.

The students of the Conservatoire were compelled to practise with the

greatest exactitude my new symphony under his dry and terribly noisy

baton. In the presence of several of my friends, amongst whom was also

the dear old Count Pachta in his capacity of President of the

Conservatoire Committee, we actually held a first performance of the

greatest work that I had written up to that date.

During these musical successes I went on with my love-making in the

attractive house of Count Pachta, under the most curious circumstances.

A confectioner of the name of Hascha was my rival. He was a tall, lanky

young man who, like most Bohemians, had taken up music as a hobby; he

played the accompaniments to Auguste’s songs, and naturally fell in

love with her. Like myself, he hated the frequent visits of the

cavaliers, which seemed to be quite the custom in this city; but while

my displeasure expressed itself in humour, his showed itself in gloomy

melancholy. This mood made him behave boorishly in public: for

instance, one evening, when the chandelier was to be lighted for the

reception of one of these gentlemen, he ran his head purposely against

this ornament and broke it. The festive illumination was thus rendered

impossible; the Countess was furious, and Hascha had to leave the house

never to return.

I well remember that the first time I was conscious of any feelings of

love, these manifested themselves as pangs of jealousy, which had,

however, nothing to do with real love: this happened one evening when I

called at the house. The Countess kept me by her side in an ante-room,

while the girls, beautifully dressed and gay, flirted in the

reception-room with those hateful young noblemen. All I had ever read

in Hoffmann’s Tales of certain demoniacal intrigues, which until that

moment had been obscure to me, now became really tangible facts, and I

left Prague with an obviously unjust and exaggerated opinion of those

things and those people, through whom I had suddenly been dragged into

an unknown world of elementary passions.

On the other hand I had gained by my stay at Pravonin: I had written

poetry as well as musical compositions. My musical work was a setting

of Glockentone, a poem by the friend of my youth, Theodor Apel. I had

already written an aria for soprano which had been performed the winter

before at one of the theatre concerts. But my new work was decidedly

the first vocal piece I had written with real inspiration; generally

speaking, I suppose it owed its’ characteristics to the influence of

Beethoven’s Liederkreis: all the same, the impression that it has left

on my mind is that it was absolutely part of myself, and pervaded by a

delicate sentimentality which was brought into relief by the dreaminess

of the accompaniment. My poetical efforts lay in the direction of a

sketch of a tragi-operatic subject, which I finished in its entirety in

Prague under the title of Die Hochzeit (‘The Wedding’). I wrote it

without anybody’s knowledge, and this was no easy matter, seeing that I

could not write in my chilly little hotel-room, and had therefore to go

to the house of Moritz, where I generally spent my mornings. I remember

how I used quickly to hide my manuscript behind the sofa as soon as I

heard my host’s footsteps.

An extraordinary episode was connected with the plot of this work.

Already years ago I had come across a tragic story, whilst perusing

Busching’s book on chivalry, the like of which I have never since read.

A lady of noble birth had been assaulted one night by a man who

secretly cherished a passionate love for her, and in the struggle to

defend her honour superhuman strength was given her to fling him into

the courtyard below. The mystery of his death remained unexplained

until the day of his solemn obsequies, when the lady herself, who

attended them and was kneeling in solemn prayer, suddenly fell forward

and expired. The mysterious strength of this profound and passionate

story made an indelible impression upon my mind. Fascinated, moreover,

by the peculiar treatment of similar phenomena in Hoffmann’s Tales, I

sketched a novel in which musical mysticism, which I still loved so

deeply, played an important part. The action was supposed to take place

on the estate of a rich patron of the fine arts: a young couple was

going to be married, and had invited the friend of the bride-groom, an

interesting but melancholy and mysterious young man, to their wedding.

Intimately connected with the whole affair was a strange old organist.

The mystic relations which gradually developed between the old

musician, the melancholy young man and the bride, were to grow out of

the unravelment of certain intricate events, in a somewhat similar

manner to that of the mediaeval story above related. Here was the same

idea: the young man mysteriously killed, the equally strange sudden

death of his friend’s bride, and the old organist found dead on his

bench after the playing of an impressive requiem, the last chord of

which was inordinately prolonged as if it never would end.

I never finished this novel: but as I wanted to write the libretto for

an opera, I took up the theme again in its original shape, and built on

this (as far as the principal features went) the following dramatic

plot:—

Two great houses had lived in enmity, and had at last decided to end

the family feud. The aged head of one of these houses invited the son

of his former enemy to the wedding of his daughter with one of his

faithful partisans. The wedding feast is thus used as an opportunity

for reconciling the two families. Whilst the guests are full of the

suspicion and fear of treachery, their young leader falls violently in

love with the bride of his newly found ally. His tragic glance deeply

affects her; the festive escort accompanies her to the bridal chamber,

where she is to await her beloved; leaning against her tower-window she

sees the same passionate eyes fixed on her, and realises that she is

face to face with a tragedy.

When he penetrates into her chamber, and embraces her with frantic

passion, she pushes him backwards towards the balcony, and throws him

over the parapet into the abyss, from whence his mutilated remains are

dragged by his companions. They at once arm themselves against the

presumed treachery, and call for vengeance; tumult and confusion fill

the courtyard: the interrupted wedding feast threatens to end in a

night of slaughter. The venerable head of the house at last succeeds in

averting the catastrophe. Messengers are sent to bear the tidings of

the mysterious calamity to the relatives of the victim: the corpse

itself shall be the medium of reconciliation, for, in the presence of

the different generations of the suspected family, Providence itself

shall decide which of its members has been guilty of treason. During

the preparations for the obsequies the bride shows signs of approaching

madness; she flies from her bridegroom, refuses to be united to him,

and locks herself up in her tower-chamber. Only when, at night, the

gloomy though gorgeous ceremony commences, does she appear at the head

of her women to be present at the burial service, the gruesome

solemnity of which is interrupted by the news of the approach of

hostile forces and then by the armed attack of the kinsmen of the

murdered man. When the avengers of the presumed treachery penetrate

into the chapel and call upon the murderer to declare himself, the

horrified lord of the manor points towards his daughter who, turning

away from her bridegroom, falls lifeless by the coffin of her victim.

This nocturnal drama, through which ran reminiscences of Leubald und

Adelaïde (the work of my far-off boyhood), I wrote in the darkest vein,

but in a more polished and more noble style, disdaining all

light-effects, and especially all operatic embellishments. Tender

passages occurred here and there all the same, and Weinlich, to whom I

had already shown the beginning of my work on my return to Leipzig,

praised me for the clearness and good vocal quality of the introduction

I had composed to the first act; this was an Adagio for a vocal

septette, in which I had tried to express the reconciliation of the

hostile families, together with the emotions of the wedded couple and

the sinister passion of the secret lover. My principal object was, all

the same, to win my sister Rosalie’s approval. My poem, however, did

not find favour in her eyes: she missed all that which I had purposely

avoided, insisted on the ornamentation and development of the simple

situation, and desired more brightness generally. I made up my mind in

an instant: I took the manuscript, and without a suggestion of

ill-temper, destroyed it there and then. This action had nothing

whatever to do with wounded vanity. It was prompted merely by my desire

honestly to prove to my sister how little I thought of my own work and

how much I cared for her opinion. She was held in great and loving

esteem by my mother and by the rest of our family, for she was their

principal breadwinner: the important salary she earned as an actress

constituted nearly the whole income out of which my mother had to

defray the household expenses. For the sake of her profession she

enjoyed many advantages at home. Her part of the house had been

specially arranged so that she should have all the necessary comfort

and peace for her studies; on marketing days, when the others had to

put up with the simplest fare, she had to have the same dainty food as

usual. But more than any of these things did her charming gravity and

her refined way of speaking place her above the younger children. She

was thoughtful and gentle and never joined us in our rather loud

conversation. Of course, I had been the one member of the family who

had caused the greatest anxieties both to my mother and to my motherly

sister, and during my life as a student the strained relations between

us had made a terrible impression on me. When therefore they tried to

believe in me again, and once more showed some interest in my work, I

was full of gratitude and happiness. The thought of getting this sister

to look kindly upon my aspirations, and even to expect great things of

me, had become a special stimulus to my ambition. Under these

circumstances a tender and almost sentimental relationship grew up

between Rosalie and myself, which in its purity and sincerity could vie

with the noblest form of friendship between man and woman. This was

principally due to her exceptional individuality. She had not any real

talent, at least not for acting, which had often been considered stagey

and unnatural. Nevertheless she was much appreciated owing to her

charming appearance as well as to her pure and dignified womanliness,

and I remember many tokens of esteem which she received in those days.

All the same, none of these advances ever seemed to lead to the

prospect of a marriage, and year by year went by without bringing her

hopes of a suitable match—a fact which to me appeared quite

unaccountable. From time to time I thought I noticed that Rosalie

suffered from this state of affairs. I remember one evening when,

believing herself to be alone, I heard her sobbing and moaning; I stole

away unnoticed, but her grief made such an impression upon me that from

that moment I vowed to bring some joy into her life, principally by

making a name for myself. Not without reason had our stepfather Geyer

given my gentle sister the nickname of ‘Geistchen’ (little spirit), for

if her talent as an actress was not great, her imagination and her love

of art and of all high and noble things were perhaps, on that account

alone, all the greater. From her lips I had first heard expressions of

admiration and delight concerning those subjects which became dear to

me later on, and she moved amongst a circle of serious and interesting

people who loved the higher things of life without this attitude ever

degenerating into affectation.

On my return from my long journey I was introduced to Heinrich Laube,

whom my sister had added to her list of intimate friends. It was at the

time when the after-effects of the July revolution were beginning to

make themselves felt amongst the younger men of intellect in Germany,

and of these Laube was one of the most conspicuous. As a young man he

came from Silesia to Leipzig, his principal object being to try and

form connections in this publishing centre which might be of use to him

in Paris, whither he was going, and from which place Borne also made a

sensation amongst us by his letters. On this occasion Laube was present

at a representation of a play by Ludwig Robert, Die Macht der

Verhallnisse (‘The Power of Circumstances’). This induced him to write

a criticism for the Leipzig Tageblatt, which made such a sensation

through its terse and lively style that he was at once offered, in

addition to other literary work, the post of editor of Die elegante

Welt. In our house he was looked upon as a genius; his curt and often

biting manner of speaking, which seemed to exclude all attempt at

poetic expression, made him appear both original and daring: his sense

of justice, his sincerity and fearless bluntness made one respect his

character, hardened as it had been in youth by great adversity. On me

he had a very inspiring effect, and I was very much astonished to find

that he thought so much of me as to write a flattering notice about my

talent in his paper after hearing the first performance of my symphony.

This performance took place in the beginning of the year 1833 at the

Leipzig Schneider-Herberge. It was, by the bye, in this dignified old

hall that the society ‘Euterpe’ held its concerts! The place was dirty,

narrow, and poorly lighted, and it was here that my work was introduced

to the Leipzig public for the first time, and by means of an orchestra

that interpreted it simply disgracefully. I can only think of that

evening as a gruesome nightmare; and my astonishment was therefore all

the greater at seeing the important notice which Laube wrote about the

performance. Full of hope, I therefore looked forward to a performance

of the same work at the Gewandhaus concert, which followed soon after,

and which came off brilliantly in every way. It was well received and

well spoken of in all the papers; of real malice there was not a

trace—on the contrary, several notices wore encouraging, and Laube, who

had quickly become celebrated, confided to me that he was going to

offer me a libretto for an opera, which he had first written for

Meyerbeer. This staggered me somewhat, for I was not in the least

prepared to pose as a poet, and my only idea was to write a real plot

for an opera. As to the precise manner, however, in which such a book

had to be written, I already had a very definite and instinctive

notion, and I was strengthened in the certainty of my own feelings in

the matter when Laube now explained the nature of his plot to me. He

told me that he wanted to arrange nothing less than Kosziusko into a

libretto for grand opera! Once again I had qualms, for I felt at once

that Laube had a mistaken idea about the character of a dramatic

subject. When I inquired into the real action of the play, Laube was

astonished that I should expect more than the story of the Polish hero,

whose life was crowded with incident; in any case, he thought there was

quite sufficient action in it to describe the unhappy fate of a whole

nation. Of course the usual heroine was not missing; she was a Polish

girl who had a love affair with a Russian; and in this way some

sentimental situations were also to be found in the plot. Without a

moment’s delay I assured my sister Rosalie that I would not set this

story to music: she agreed with me, and begged me only to postpone my

answer to Laube. My journey to Wurzburg was of great help to me in this

respect, for it was easier to write my decision to Laube than to

announce it to him personally. He accepted the slight rebuff with good

grace, but he never forgave me, either then or afterwards, for writing

my own words!

When he heard what subject I had preferred to his brilliant political

poem, he made no effort to conceal his contempt for my choice. I had

borrowed the plot from a dramatic fairy tale by Gozzi, La Donna

Serpente, and called it Die Feen (‘The Fairies’). The names of my

heroes I chose from different Ossian and similar poems: my prince was

called Arindal; he was loved by a fairy called Ada, who held him under

her spell and kept him in fairyland, away from his realm, until his

faithful friends at last found him and induced him to return, for his

country was going to rack and ruin, and even its capital had fallen

into the enemy’s hands. The loving fairy herself sends the prince back

to his country; for the oracle has decreed that she shall lay upon her

lover the severest of tasks. Only by performing this task triumphantly

can he make it possible for her to leave the immortal world of fairies

in order to share the fate of her earthly lover, as his wife. In a

moment of deepest despair about the state of his country, the fairy

queen appears to him and purposely destroys his faith in her by deeds

of the most cruel and inexplicable nature. Driven mad by a thousand

fears, Arindal begins to imagine that all the time he has been dealing

with a wicked sorceress, and tries to escape the fatal spell by

pronouncing a curse upon Ada. Wild with sorrow, the unhappy fairy sinks

down, and reveals their mutual fate to the lover, now lost to her for

ever, and tells him that, as a punishment for having disobeyed the

decree of Fate, she is doomed to be turned into stone (in Gozzi’s

version she becomes a serpent). Immediately afterwards it appears that

all the catastrophes which the fairy had prophesied were but

deceptions: victory over the enemy as well as the growing prosperity

and welfare of the kingdom now follow in quick succession: Ada is taken

away by the Fates, and Arindal, a raving madman, remains behind alone.

The terrible sufferings of his madness do not, however, satisfy the

Fates: to bring about his utter ruin they appear before the repentant

man and invite him to follow them to the nether world, on the pretext

of enabling him to free Ada from the spell. Through the treacherous

promises of the wicked fairies Arindal’s madness grows into sublime

exaltation; and one of his household magicians, a faithful friend,

having in the meantime equipped him with magic weapons and charms, he

now follows the traitresses. The latter cannot get over their

astonishment when they see how Arindal overcomes one after the other of

the monsters of the infernal regions: only when they arrive at the

vault in which they show him the stone in human shape do they recover

their hope of vanquishing the valiant prince, for, unless he can break

the charm which binds Ada, he must share her fate and be doomed to

remain a stone for ever. Arindal, who until then has been using the

dagger and the shield given him by the friendly magician, now makes use

of an instrument—a lyre—which he has brought with him, and the meaning

of which he had not yet understood. To the sounds of this instrument he

now expresses his plaintive moans, his remorse, and his overpowering

longing for his enchanted queen. The stone is moved by the magic of his

love: the beloved one is released. Fairyland with all its marvels opens

its portals, and the mortal learns that, owing to his former

inconstancy, Ada has lost the right to become his wife on earth, but

that her beloved, through his great and magic power, has earned the

right to live for ever by her side in fairyland.

Although I had written Die Hochzeit in the darkest vein, without

operatic embellishments, I painted this subject with the utmost colour

and variety. In contrast to the lovers out of fairyland I depicted a

more ordinary couple, and I even introduced a third pair that belonged

to the coarser and more comical servant world. I purposely went to no

pains in the matter of the poetic diction and the verse. My idea was

not to encourage my former hopes of making a name as a poet; I was now

really a ‘musician’ and a ‘composer,’ and wished to write a decent

opera libretto simply because I was sure that nobody else could write

one for me; the reason being that such a book is something quite unique

and cannot be written either by a poet or by a mere man of letters.

With the intention of setting this libretto to music, I left Leipzig in

January, 1833, to stay in Wurzburg with my eldest brother Albert, who

at the time held an appointment at the theatre. It now seemed necessary

for me to begin to apply my musical knowledge to a practical purpose,

and to this end my brother had promised to help me in getting some kind

of post at the small Wurzburg theatre. I travelled by post to Bamberg

via Hof, and in Bamberg I stayed a few days in the company of a young

man called Schunke, who from a player on the horn had become an actor.

With the greatest interest I learned the story of Caspar Hauser, who at

that time was very well known, and who (if I am not mistaken) was

pointed out to me. In addition to this, I admired the peculiar costumes

of the market-women, thought with much interest of Hoffmann’s stay at

this place, and of how it had led to the writing of his Tales, and

resumed my journey (to Wurzburg) with a man called Hauderer, and

suffered miserably from the cold all the way.

My brother Albert, who was almost a new acquaintance to me, did his

best to make me feel at home in his not over luxurious establishment.

He was pleased to find me less mad than he had expected me to be from a

certain letter with which I had succeeded in frightening him some time

previously, and he really managed to procure me an exceptional

occupation as choir-master at the theatre, for which I received the

monthly fee of ten guilders. The remainder of the winter was devoted to

the serious study of the duties required of a musical director: in a

very short time I had to tackle two new grand operas, namely,

Marschner’s Vampir and Meyerbeer’s Robert der Teufel, in both of which

the chorus played a considerable part. At first I felt absolutely like

a beginner, and had to start on Camilla von Paer, the score of which

was utterly unknown to me. I still remember that I felt I was doing a

thing which I had no right to undertake: I felt quite an amateur at the

work. Soon, however, Marschner’s score interested me sufficiently to

make the labour seem worth my while. The score of Robert was a great

disappointment to me: from the newspapers I had expected plenty of

originality and novelty; I could find no trace of either in this

transparent work, and an opera with a finale like that of the second

act could not be named in the same breath with any of my favourite

works. The only thing that impressed me was the unearthly keyed trumpet

which, in the last act, represented the voice of the mother’s ghost.

It was remarkable to observe the aesthetic demoralisation into which I

now fell through having daily to deal with such a work. I gradually

lost my dislike for this shallow and exceedingly uninteresting

composition (a dislike I shared with many German musicians) in the

growing interest which I was compelled to take in its interpretation;

and thus it happened that the insipidness and affectation of the

commonplace melodies ceased to concern me save from the standpoint of

their capability of eliciting applause or the reverse. As, moreover, my

future career as musical conductor was at stake, my brother, who was

very anxious on my behalf, looked favourably on this lack of classical

obstinacy on my part, and thus the ground was gradually prepared for

that decline in my classical taste which was destined to last some

considerable time.

All the same, this did not occur before I had given some proof of my

great inexperience in the lighter style of writing. My brother wanted

to introduce a ‘Cavatine’ from the Piraten, by Bellini, into the same

composer’s opera, Straniera; the score was not to be had, and he

entrusted me with the instrumentation of this work. From the piano

score alone I could not possibly detect the heavy and noisy

instrumentation of the ritornelles and intermezzi which, musically,

were so very thin; the composer of a great C major Symphony with an end

fugue could only help himself out of the difficulty by the use of a few

flutes and clarinets playing in thirds. At the rehearsal the ‘Cavatine’

sounded so frightfully thin and shallow that my brother made me serious

reproaches about the waste of copying expenses. But I had my revenge:

to the tenor aria of ‘Aubry’ in Marschner’s Vampir I added an Allegro,

for which I also wrote the words.

My work succeeded splendidly, and earned the praise of both the public

and my brother. In a similar German style I wrote the music to my Feen

in the course of the year 1833. My brother and his wife left Wurzburg

after Easter in order to avail themselves of several invitations at

friends’ houses; I stayed behind with the children—three little girls

of tender years—which placed me in the extraordinary position of a

responsible guardian, a post for which I was not in the least suited at

that time of my life. My time was divided between my work and pleasure,

and in consequence I neglected my charges. Amongst the friends I made

there, Alexander Muller had much influence over me; he was a good

musician and pianist, and I used to listen for hours to his

improvisations on given themes—an accomplishment in which he so greatly

excelled, that I could not fail to be impressed. With him and some

other friends, amongst whom was also Valentin Hamm, I often made

excursions in the neighbourhood, on which occasions the Bavarian beer

and the Frankish wine were wont to fly. Valentin Hamm was a grotesque

individual, who entertained us often with his excellent violin playing;

he had an enormous stretch on the piano, for he could reach an interval

of a twelfth. Der Letzte Hieb, a public beer-garden situated on a

pleasant height, was a daily witness of my fits of wild and often

enthusiastic boisterousness; never once during those mild summer nights

did I return to my charges without having waxed enthusiastic over art

and the world in general. I also remember a wicked trick which has

always remained a blot in my memory. Amongst my friends was a fair and

very enthusiastic Swabian called Frohlich, with whom I had exchanged my

score of the C minor Symphony for his, which he had copied out with his

own hand. This very gentle, but rather irritable young man had taken

such a violent dislike to one Andre, whose malicious face I also

detested, that he declared that this person spoilt his evenings for

him, merely by being in the same room with him. The unfortunate object

of his hatred tried all the same to meet us whenever he could: friction

ensued, but Andre would insist upon aggravating us. One evening

Frohlich lost patience. After some insulting retort, he tried to chase

him from our table by striking him with a stick: the result was a fight

in which Frolich’s friends felt they must take part, though they all

seemed to do so with some reluctance. A mad longing to join the fray

also took possession of me. With the others I helped in knocking our

poor victim about, and I even heard the sound of one terrible blow

which I struck Andre on the head, whilst he fixed his eyes on me in

bewilderment.

I relate this incident to atone for a sin which has weighed very

heavily on my conscience ever since. I can compare this sad experience

only with one out of my earliest boyhood days, namely the drowning of

some puppies in a shallow pool behind my uncle’s house in Eisleben.

Even to this day I cannot think of the slow death of these poor little

creatures without horror. I have never quite forgotten some of my

thoughtless and reckless actions; for the sorrows of others, and in

particular those of animals, have always affected me deeply to the

extent of filling me with a disgust of life.

My first love affair stands out in strong contrast against these

recollections. It was only natural that one of the young chorus ladies

with whom I had to practise daily should know how to attract my

attentions. Therese Ringelmann, the daughter of a grave-digger, thanks

to her beautiful soprano voice, led me to believe that I could make a

great singer of her. After I told her of this ambitious scheme, she

paid much attention to her appearance, and dressed elegantly for the

rehearsals, and a row of white pearls which she wound through her hair

specially fascinated me. During the summer holidays I gave Therese

regular lessons in singing, according to a method which has always

remained a mystery to me ever since. I also called on her very often at

her house, where, fortunately, I never met her unpleasant father, but

always her mother and her sisters. We also met in the public gardens,

but false vanity always kept me from telling my friends of our

relations. I do not know whether the fault lay with her lowly birth,

her lack of education, or my own doubt about the sincerity of my

affections; but in any case when, in addition to the fact that I had my

reasons for being jealous, they also tried to urge me to a formal

engagement, this love affair came quietly to an end.

An infinitely more genuine affair was my love for Friederike Galvani,

the daughter of a mechanic, who was undoubtedly of Italian origin. She

was very musical, and had a lovely voice; my brother had patronised her

and helped her to a debut at his theatre, which test she stood

brilliantly. She was rather small, but had large dark eyes and a sweet

disposition. The first oboist of the orchestra, a good fellow as well

as a clever musician, was thoroughly devoted to her. He was looked upon

as her fiance, but, owing to some incident in his past, he was not

allowed to visit at her parents’ house, and the marriage was not to

take place for a long time yet. When the autumn of my year in Wurzburg

drew near, I received an invitation from friends to be present at a

country wedding at a little distance from Wurzburg; the oboist and his

fiancee had also been invited. It was a jolly, though primitive affair;

we drank and danced, and I even tried my hand at violin playing, but I

must have forgotten it badly, for even with the second violin I could

not manage to satisfy the other musicians. But my success with

Friederike was all the greater; we danced like mad through the many

couples of peasants until at one moment we got so excited that, losing

all self-control, we embraced each other while her real lover was

playing the dance music. For the first time in my life I began to feel

a flattering sensation of self-respect when Friederike’s fiance, on

seeing how we two flirted, accepted the situation with good grace, if

not without some sadness. I had never had the chance of thinking that I

could make a favourable impression on any young girl. I never imagined

myself good-looking, neither had I ever thought it possible that I

could attract the attention of pretty girls.

On the other hand, I had gradually acquired a certain self-reliance in

mixing with men of my own age. Owing to the exceptional vivacity and

innate susceptibility of my nature—qualities which were brought home to

me in my relations with members of my circle—I gradually became

conscious of a certain power of transporting or bewildering my more

indolent companions.

From my poor oboist’s silent self-control on becoming aware of the

ardent advances of his betrothed towards me, I acquired, as I have

said, the first suggestion of the fact that I might count for

something, not only among men, but also among women. The Frankish wine

helped to bring about a state of ever greater confusion, and under the

cover of its influence I at length declared myself, quite openly, to be

Friederike’s lover. Ever so far into the night, in fact, when day was

already breaking, we set off home together to Wurzburg in an open

wagon. This was the crowning triumph of my delightful adventure; for

while all the others, including, in the end, the jealous oboist, slept

off their debauch in the face of the dawning day, I, with my cheek

against Friederike’s, and listening to the warbling of the larks,

watched the coming of the rising sun.

On the following day we had scarcely any idea of what had happened. A

certain sense of shame, which was not unbecoming, held us aloof from

one another: and yet I easily won access to Friederike’s family, and

from that time forward was daily a welcome guest, when for some hours I

would linger in unconcealed intimate intercourse with the same domestic

circle from which the unhappy betrothed remained excluded. No word was

ever mentioned of this last connection; never once did it even dawn

upon Friederike to effect any change in the state of affairs, and it

seemed to strike no one that I ought, so to speak, to take the fiance’s

place. The confiding manner in which I was received by all, and

especially by the girl herself, was exactly similar to one of Nature’s

great processes, as, for instance, when spring steps in and winter

passes silently away. Not one of them ever considered the material

consequences of the change, and this is precisely the most charming and

flattering feature of this first youthful love affair, which was never

to degenerate into an attitude which might give rise to suspicion or

concern. These relations ended only with my departure from Wurzburg,

which was marked by the most touching and most tearful leavetaking.

For some time, although I kept up no correspondence, the memory of this

episode remained firmly imprinted on my mind. Two years later, while

making a rapid journey through the old district, I once more visited

Friederike: the poor child approached me utterly shamefaced. Her oboist

was still her lover, and though his position rendered marriage

impossible, the unfortunate young woman had become a mother. I have

heard nothing more of her since.

Amid all this traffic of love I worked hard at my opera, and, thanks to

the loving sympathy of my sister Rosalie, I was able to find the

necessary good spirits for the task. When at the commencement of the

summer my earnings as a conductor came to an end, this same sister

again made it her business loyally to provide me with ample

pocket-money, so that I might devote myself solely to the completion of

my work, without troubling about anything or being a burden to any one.

At a much later date I came across a letter of mine written to Rosalie

in those days, which were full of a tender, almost adoring love for

that noble creature.

When the winter was at hand my brother returned, and the theatre

reopened. Truth to tell, I did not again become connected with it, but

acquired a position, which was even more prominent, in the concerts of

the Musical Society in which I produced my great overture in C major,

my symphony, and eventually portions of my new opera as well. An

amateur with a splendid voice, Mademoiselle Friedel, sang the great

aria from Ada. In addition to this, a trio was given which, in one of

its passages, had such a moving effect upon my brother, who took part

in it, that, to his astonishment, as he himself admitted, he completely

lost his cue on account of it.

By Christmas my work had come to an end, my score was written out

complete with the most laudable neatness, and now I was to return to

Leipzig for the New Year, in order to get my opera accepted by the

theatre there. On the way home I visited Nuremberg, where I stayed a

week with my sister Clara and with her husband, who were engaged at the

theatre there. I well remember how happy and comfortable I felt during

this pleasant visit to the very same relatives who a few years

previously, when I had stayed with them at Magdeburg, had been upset by

my resolve to adopt music as a calling. Now I had become a real

musician, had written a grand opera, and had already brought out many

things without coming to grief. The sense of all this was a great joy

to me, while it was no less flattering to my relatives, who could not

fail to see that the supposed misfortune had in the end proved to my

advantage. I was in a jolly mood and quite unrestrained—a state of mind

which was very largely the result not only of my brother-in-law’s

cheerful and sociable household, but also of the pleasant tavern life

of the place. In a much more confident and elated spirit I returned to

Leipzig, where I was able to lay the three huge volumes of my score

before my highly delighted mother and sister.

Just then my family was the richer for the return of my brother Julius

from his long wanderings. He had worked a good while in Paris as a

goldsmith, and had now set up for himself in that capacity in Leipzig.

He too, like the rest, was eager to hear something out of my opera,

which, to be sure, was not so easy, as I entirely lacked the gift of

playing anything of the sort in an easy and intelligible way. Only when

I was able to work myself into a state of absolute ecstasy was it

possible for me to render something with any effect. Rosalie knew that

I meant it to draw a sort of declaration of love from her; but I have

never felt certain whether the embrace and the sisterly kiss which were

awarded me after I had sung my great aria from Ada, were bestowed on me

from real emotion or rather out of affectionate regard. On the other

hand, the zeal with which she urged my opera on the director of the

theatre, Ringelhardt, the conductor and the manager was unmistakable,

and she did it so effectually that she obtained their consent for its

performance, and that very speedily. I was particularly interested to

learn that the management immediately showed themselves eager to try to

settle the matter of the costumes for my drama: but I was astonished to

hear that the choice was in favour of oriental attire, whereas I had

intended, by the names I had selected, to suggest a northern character

for the setting. But it was precisely these names which they found

unsuitable, as fairy personages are not seen in the North, but only in

the East; while apart from this, the original by Gozzi, which formed

the basis of the work, undoubtedly bore an oriental character. It was

with the utmost indignation that I opposed the insufferable turban and

caftan style of dress, and vehemently advocated the knightly garb worn

in the early years of the Middle Ages. I then had to come to a thorough

understanding with the conductor, Stegmayer, on the subject of my

score. He was a remarkable, short, fat man, with fair curly hair, and

an exceptionally jovial disposition; he was, however, very hard to

bring to a point. When over our wine we always arrived at an

understanding very quickly, but as soon as we sat at the piano, I had

to listen to the most extraordinary objections concerning the trend of

which I was for some time extremely puzzled. As the matter was much

delayed by this vacillation, I put myself into closer communication

with the stage manager of the opera, Hauser, who at that time was much

appreciated as a singer and patron of art by the people of Leipzig.

With this man, too, I had the strangest experiences: he who had

captivated the audiences of Leipzig, more especially with his

impersonation of the barber and the Englishman in Fra Diavolo, suddenly

revealed himself in his own house as the most fanatical adherent of the

most old-fashioned music. I listened with astonishment to the scarcely

veiled contempt with which he treated even Mozart, and the only thing

he seemed to regret was that we had no operas by Sebastian Bach. After

he had explained to me that dramatic music had not actually been

written yet, and that properly speaking Gluck alone had shown any

ability for it, he proceeded to what seemed an exhaustive examination

of my own opera, concerning which all I had wished to hear from him was

whether it was fit to be performed. Instead of this, however, his

object seemed to be to point out the failure of my purpose in every

number. I sweated blood under the unparalleled torture of going through

my work with this man; and I told my mother and sister of my grave

depression. All these delays had already succeeded in making it

impossible to perform my opera at the date originally fixed, and now it

was postponed until August of the current year (1834).

An incident which I shall never forget inspired me with fresh courage.

Old Bierey, an experienced and excellent musician, and in his day a

successful composer, who, thanks more particularly to his long practice

as a conductor at the Breslau theatre, had acquired a perfectly

practical knowledge of such things, was then living at Leipzig, and was

a good friend of my people. My mother and sister begged him to give his

opinion about the fitness of my opera for the stage, and I duly

submitted the score to him. I cannot say how deeply affected and

impressed I was to see this old gentleman appear one day among my

relatives, and to hear him declare with genuine enthusiasm that he

simply could not understand how so young a man could have composed such

a score. His remarks concerning the greatness which he had recognised

in my talent were really irresistible, and positively amazed me. When

asked whether he considered the work presentable and calculated to

produce an effect, he declared his only regret was that he was no

longer at the head of a theatre, because, had he been, he would have

thought himself extremely lucky to secure such a man as myself

permanently for his enterprise. At this announcement my family was

overcome with joy, and their feelings were all the more justified

seeing that, as they all knew, Bierey was by no means an amiable

romancer, but a practical musician well seasoned by a life full of

experience.

The delay was now borne with better spirits, and for a long time I was

able to wait hopefully for what the future might bring. Among other

things, I now began to enjoy the company of a new friend in the person

of Laube, who at that time, although I had not set his Kosziusko to

music, was at the zenith of his fame. The first portion of his novel,

Young Europe, the form of which was epistolary, had appeared, and had a

most stimulating effect on me, more particularly in conjunction with

all the youthful hopefulness which at that time pulsated in my veins.

Though his teaching was essentially only a repetition of that in

Heinse’s Ardinghello, the forces that then surged in young breasts were

given full and eloquent expression. The guiding spirit of this tendency

was followed in literary criticism, which was aimed mainly at the

supposed or actual incapacity of the semi-classical occupants of our

various literary thrones. Without the slightest mercy the pedants,[6]

among whom Tieck for one was numbered, were treated as sheer

encumbrances and hindrances to the rise of a new literature. That which

led to a remarkable revulsion of my feelings with regard to those

German composers who hitherto had been admired and respected, was

partly the influence of these critical skirmishes, and the luring

sprightliness of their tone; but mainly the impression made by a fresh

visit of Schroder-Devrient to Leipzig, when her rendering of Borneo in

Bellini’s Romeo and Juliet carried every one by storm. The effect of it

was not to be compared with anything that had been witnessed

theretofore. To see the daring, romantic figure of the youthful lover

against a background of such obviously shallow and empty music prompted

one, at all events, to meditate doubtfully upon the cause of the great

lack of effect in solid German music as it had been applied hitherto to

the drama. Without for the moment plunging too deeply into this

meditation, I allowed myself to be borne along with the current of my

youthful feelings, then roused to ardour, and turned involuntarily to

the task of working off all that brooding seriousness which in my

earlier years had driven me to such pathetic mysticism.

[6] _Zöpfe_ in the German text.—TRANSLATOR.

What Pohlenz had not done by his conducting of the Ninth Symphony, what

the Vienna Conservatoire, Dionys Weber, and many other clumsy

performances (which had led me to regard classical music as absolutely

colourless) had not fully accomplished, was achieved by the

inconceivable charm of the most unclassical Italian music, thanks to

the wonderful, thrilling, and entrancing impersonation of Romeo by

Schroder-Devrient. What effect such powerful, and as regards their

causes, incomprehensible, effects had upon my opinion was shown in the

frivolous way in which I was able to contrive a short criticism of

Weber’s Euryanthe for the Elegante Zeitung. This opera had been

performed by the Leipzig company shortly before the appearance of

Schroder-Devrient: cold and colourless performers, among whom the

singer in the title-role, appearing in the wilderness with the full

sleeves which were then the pink of fashion, is still a disagreeable

memory. Very laboriously, and without verve, but simply with the object

of satisfying the demands of classical rules, this company did its

utmost to dispel even the enthusiastic impressions of Weber’s music

which I had formed in my youth. I did not know what answer to make to a

brother critic of Laube’s, when he pointed out to me the laboured

character of this operatic performance, as soon as he was able to

contrast it with the entrancing effect of that Romeo evening. Here I

found myself confronted with a problem, the solving of which I was just

at that time disposed to take as easily as possible, and displayed my

courage by discarding all prejudice, and that daringly, in the short

criticism just mentioned in which I simply scoffed at Euryanthe. Just

as I had had my season of wild oat sowing as a student, so now I boldly

rushed into the same courses in the development of my artistic taste.

It was May, and beautiful spring weather, and a pleasure trip that I

now undertook with a friend into the promised land of my youthful

romance, Bohemia, was destined to bring the unrestrained

‘Young-European’ mood in me to full maturity. This friend was Theodor

Apel. I had known him a long while, and had always felt particularly

flattered by the fact that I had won his hearty affection; for, as the

son of the gifted master of metre and imitator of Greek forms of

poetry, August Apel, I felt that admiring deference for him which I had

never yet been able to bestow upon the descendant of a famous man.

Being well-to-do and of a good family, his friendship gave me such

opportunities of coming into touch with the easy circumstances of the

upper classes as were not of frequent occurrence in my station of life.

While my mother, for instance, regarded my association with this highly

respectable family with great satisfaction, I for my part was extremely

gratified at the thought of the cordiality with which I was received in

such circles.

Apel’s earnest wish was to become a poet, and I took it for granted

that he had all that was needed for such a calling; above all, what

seemed to me so important, the complete freedom that his considerable

fortune assured him by liberating him from all need of earning his

living or of adopting a profession for a livelihood. Strange to say,

his mother, who on the death of his distinguished father had married a

Leipzig lawyer, was very anxious about the vocation he should choose,

and wished her son to make a fine career in the law, as she was not at

all disposed to favour his poetical gifts. And it was to her attempts

to convert me to her view, in order that by my influence I might avert

the calamity of a second poet in the family, in the person of the son,

that I owed the specially friendly relations that obtained between

herself and me. All her suggestions succeeded in doing, however, was to

stimulate me, even more than my own favourable opinion of his talent

could, to confirm my friend in his desire to be a poet, and thus to

support him in his rebellious attitude towards his family.

He was not displeased at this. As he was also studying music and

composed quite nicely, I succeeded in being on terms of the greatest

intimacy with him. The fact that he had spent the very year in which I

had sunk into the lowest depths of undergraduate madness, studying at

Heidelberg and not at Leipzig, had kept him unsullied by any share in

my strange excesses, and when we now met again at Leipzig, in the

spring of 1834, the only thing that we still had in common was the

aesthetic aspiration of our lives, which we now strove by way of

experiment to divert into the direction of the enjoyment of life.

Gladly would we have flung ourselves into lively adventures if only the

conditions of our environment and of the whole middle-class world in

which we lived had in any way admitted of such things. Despite all the

promptings of our instincts, however, we got no further than planning

this excursion to Bohemia. At all events, it was something that we made

the journey not by the post, but in our own carriage, and our genuine

pleasure continued to lie in the fact that at Teplitz, for instance, we

daily took long drives in a fine carriage. When in the evening we had

supped off trout at the Wilhelmsburg, drunk good Czernosek wine with

Bilin water, and duly excited ourselves over Hoffmann, Beethoven,

Shakespeare, Heinse’s Ardinghello, and other matters, and then, with

our limbs comfortably outstretched in our elegant carriage, drove back

in the summer twilight to the ‘King of Prussia,’ where we occupied the

large balcony-room on the first floor, we felt that we had spent the

day like young gods, and for sheer exuberance could think of nothing

better to do than to indulge in the most frightful quarrels which,

especially when the windows were open, would collect numbers of alarmed

listeners in the square before the inn.

One fine morning I stole away from my friend in order to take my

breakfast alone at the ‘Schlackenburg,’ and also to seize an

opportunity of jotting down the plan of a new operatic composition in

my note-book. With this end in view, I had mastered the subject of

Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure, which, in accordance with my present

mood, I soon transformed pretty freely into a libretto entitled

Liebesverbot. Young Europe and Ardinghello, and the strange frame of

mind into which I had fallen with regard to classical operatic music,

furnished me with the keynote of my conception, which was directed more

particularly against puritanical hypocrisy, and which thus tended

boldly to exalt ‘unrestrained sensuality.’ I took care to understand

the grave Shakespearean theme only in this sense. I could see only the

gloomy strait-laced viceroy, his heart aflame with the most passionate

love for the beautiful novice, who, while she beseeches him to pardon

her brother condemned to death for illicit love, at the same time

kindles the most dangerous fire in the stubborn Puritan’s breast by

infecting him with the lovely warmth of her human emotion.

The fact that these powerful features are so richly developed in

Shakespeare’s creation only in order that, in the end, they may be

weighed all the more gravely in the scales of justice, was no concern

of mine: all I cared about was to expose the sinfulness of hypocrisy

and the unnaturalness of such cruel moral censure. Thus I completely

dropped Measure for Measure, and made the hypocrite be brought to

justice only by the avenging power of love. I transferred the theme

from the fabulous city of Vienna to the capital of sunny Sicily, in

which a German viceroy, indignant at the inconceivably loose morals of

the people, attempts to introduce a puritanical reform, and comes

miserably to grief over it. Die Stumme von Portici probably contributed

to some extent to this theme, as did also certain memories of Die

Sizilianische Vesper. When I remember that at last even the gentle

Sicilian Bellini constituted a factor in this composition, I cannot, to

be sure, help smiling at the strange medley in which the most

extraordinary misunderstandings here took shape.

This remained for the present a mere draft. Studies from life destined

for my work were first to be carried out on this delightful excursion

to Bohemia. I led my friend in triumph to Prague, in the hope of

securing the same impressions for him which had stirred me so

profoundly when I was there. We met my fair friends in the city itself;

for, owing to the death of old Count Pachta, material changes had taken

place in the family, and the surviving daughters no longer went to

Pravonin. My behaviour was full of arrogance, and by means of it I

doubtless wished to vent a certain capricious lust of revenge for the

feelings of bitterness with which I had taken leave of this circle some

years previously. My friend was well received. The changed family

circumstances forced the charming girls ever more and more imperatively

to come to some decision as to their future, and a wealthy bourgeois,

though not exactly in trade himself, but in possession of ample means,

seemed to the anxious mother, at all events, a good adviser. Without

either showing or feeling any malice in the matter, I expressed my

pleasure at the sight of the strange confusion caused by Theodor’s

introduction into the family by the merriest and wildest jests: for my

only intercourse with the ladies consisted purely of jokes and friendly

chaff. They could not understand how it was that I had altered so

strangely. There was no longer any of that love of wrangling, that rage

for instructing, and that zeal in converting in me which formerly they

had found so irritating. But at the same time not a sensible word could

I be made to utter, and they who were now wanting to talk over many

things seriously could get nothing out of me save the wildest

tomfoolery. As on this occasion, in my character of an uncaged bird, I

boldly allowed myself many a liberty against which they felt themselves

powerless, my exuberant spirits were excited all the more when my

friend, who was led away by my example, tried to imitate me—a thing

they took in very bad part from him.

Only once was there any attempt at seriousness between us: I was

sitting at the piano, and was listening to my companion, who was

telling the ladies that in a conversation at the hotel I had found

occasion to express myself most warmly to some one who appeared to be

surprised on hearing of the domestic and industrious qualities of my

lady friends. I was deeply moved when, as the outcome of my companion’s

remarks, I gathered what unpleasant experiences the poor things had

already been through: for what seemed to me a very natural action on my

part, appeared to fill them with unexpected pleasure. Jenny, for

instance, came up to me and hugged me with great warmth. By general

consent I was now granted the right of behaving with almost studied

rudeness, and I replied even to Jenny’s warm outburst only with my

usual banter.

In our hotel, the ‘Black Horse,’ which was so famous in those days, I

found the playground in which I was able to carry the mischievous

spirit not exhausted at the Pachta’s house to the point of

recklessness. Out of the most accidental material in table and

travelling guests we succeeded in gathering a company around us which

allowed us, until far into the night, to lead it into the most

inconceivable follies. To all this I was incited more particularly by

the personality of a very timid and undersized business man from

Frankfort on the Oder, who longed to seem of a daring disposition; and

his presence stimulated me, if only owing to the remarkable chance it

gave me of coming into contact with some one who was at home in

Frankfort ‘on the Oder.’ Any one who knows how things then stood in

Austria can form some idea of my recklessness when I say that I once

went so far as to cause our symposium in the public room to bellow the

Marseillaise out loud into the night. Therefore, when after this heroic

exploit was over, and while I was undressing, I clambered on the outer

ledges of the windows from one room to the other on the second floor, I

naturally horrified those who did not know of the love of acrobatic

feats which I had cultivated in my earliest boyhood.

Even if I had exposed myself without fear to such dangers, I was soon

sobered down next morning by a summons from the police. When, in

addition to this, I recalled the singing of the Marseillaise, I was

filled with the gravest fears. After having been detained at the

station a long time, owing to a strange misunderstanding, the upshot of

it was that the inspector who was told off to examine me found that

there was not sufficient time left for a serious hearing, and, to my

great relief, I was allowed to go after replying to a few harmless

questions concerning the intended length of my stay. Nevertheless, we

thought it advisable not to yield to the temptation of playing any more

pranks beneath the spread wings of the double eagle.

By means of a circuitous route into which we were led by our insatiable

longing for adventures—adventures which, as a matter of fact, occurred

only in our imagination, and which to all intents and purposes were but

modest diversions on the road—we at length got back to Leipzig. And

with this return home the really cheerful period of my life as a youth

definitely closed. If, up to that time, I had not been free from

serious errors and moments of passion, it was only now that care cast

its first shadow across my path.

My family had anxiously awaited my return in order to inform me that

the post of conductor had been offered to me by the Magdeburg Theatre

Company. This company during the current summer month was performing at

a watering place called Lauchstadt. The manager could not get on with

an incompetent conductor that had been sent to him, and in his

extremity had applied to Leipzig in the hope of getting a substitute

forthwith. Stegmayer, the conductor, who had no inclination to practise

my score Feen during the hot summer weather, as he had promised to do,

promptly recommended me for the post, and in that way really managed to

shake off a very troublesome tormentor. For although, on the one hand,

I really desired to be able to abandon myself freely and without

restraint to the torrent of adventures that constitute the artist’s

life, yet a longing for independence, which could be won only by my

earning my own living, had been greatly strengthened in me by the state

of my affairs. Albeit, I had the feeling that a solid basis for the

gratification of this desire was not to be laid in Lauchstadt; nor did

I find it easy to assist the plot concocted against the production of

my Feen. I therefore determined to make a preliminary visit to the

place just to see how things stood.

This little watering-place had, in the days of Goethe and Schiller,

acquired a very wide reputation, its wooden theatre had been built

according to the design of the former, and the first performance of the

Braut von Messina had been given there. But although I repeated all

this to myself, the place made me feel rather doubtful. I asked for the

house of the director of the theatre. He proved to be out, but a small

dirty boy, his son, was told to take me to the theatre to find ‘Papa.’

Papa, however, met us on the way. He was an elderly man; he wore a

dressing-gown, and on his head a cap. His delight at greeting me was

interrupted by complaints about a serious indisposition, for which his

son was to fetch him a cordial from a shop close by. Before despatching

the boy on this errand he pressed a real silver penny into his hand

with a certain ostentation which was obviously for my benefit. This

person was Heinrich Bethmann, surviving husband of the famous actress

of that name, who, having lived in the heyday of the German stage, had

won the favour of the King of Prussia; and won it so lastingly, that

long after her death it had continued to be extended to her spouse. He

always drew a nice pension from the Prussian court, and permanently

enjoyed its support without ever being able to forfeit its protection

by his irregular and dissipated ways.

At the time of which I am speaking he had sunk to his lowest, owing to

continued theatre management. His speech and manners revealed the

sugary refinement of a bygone day, while all that he did and everything

about him testified to the most shameful neglect. He took me back to

his house, where he presented me to his second wife, who, crippled in

one foot, lay on an extraordinary couch while an elderly bass,

concerning whose excessive devotion Bethmann had already complained to

me quite openly, smoked his pipe beside her. From there the director

took me to his stage manager, who lived in the same house.

With the latter, who was just engaged in a consultation about the

repertory with the theatre attendant, a toothless old skeleton, he left

me to settle the necessary arrangements. As soon as Bethmann had gone,

Schmale, the stage manager, shrugged his shoulders and smiled, assuring

me that that was just the way of the director, to put everything on his

back and trouble himself about nothing. There he had been sitting for

over an hour, discussing with Kroge what should be put on next Sunday:

it was all very well his starting Don Juan, but how could he get a

rehearsal carried out, when the Merseburg town bandsmen, who formed the

orchestra, would not come over on Saturday to rehearse?

All the time Schmale kept reaching out through the open window to a

cherry tree from which he picked and persistently ate the fruit,

ejecting the stones with a disagreeable noise. Now it was this last

circumstance in particular which decided me; for, strange to say, I

have an innate aversion from fruit. I informed the stage manager that

he need not trouble at all about Don Juan for Sunday, since for my

part, if they had reckoned on my making my first appearance at this

performance, I must anyhow disappoint the director, as I had no choice

but to return at once to Leipzig, where I had to put my affairs in

order. This polite manner of tendering my absolute refusal to accept

the appointment—a conclusion I had quickly arrived at in my own

mind—forced me to practise some dissimulation, and made it necessary

for me to appear as if I really had some other purpose in coming to

Lauchstadt. This pretence in itself was quite unnecessary, seeing that

I was quite determined never to return there again.

People offered to help me in finding a lodging, and a young actor whom

I had chanced to know at Wurzburg undertook to be my guide in the

matter. While he was taking me to the best lodging he knew, he told me

that presently he would do me the kindness of making me the housemate

of the prettiest and nicest girl to be found in the place at the time.

She was the junior lead of the company, Mademoiselle Minna Planer, of

whom doubtless I had already heard.

As luck would have it, the promised damsel met us at the door of the

house in question. Her appearance and bearing formed the most striking

contrast possible to all the unpleasant impressions of the theatre

which it had been my lot to receive on this fateful morning. Looking

very charming and fresh, the young actress’s general manner and

movements were full of a certain majesty and grave assurance which lent

an agreeable and captivating air of dignity to her otherwise pleasant

expression. Her scrupulously clean and tidy dress completed the

startling effect of the unexpected encounter. After I had been

introduced to her in the hall as the new conductor, and after she had

done regarding with astonishment the stranger who seemed so young for

such a title, she recommended me kindly to the landlady of the house,

and begged that I might be well looked after; whereupon she walked

proudly and serenely across the street to her rehearsal.

I engaged a room on the spot, agreed to Don Juan for Sunday, regretted

greatly that I had not brought my luggage with me from Leipzig, and

hastened to return thither as quickly as possible in order to get back

to Lauchstadt all the sooner. The die was cast. The serious side of

life at once confronted me in the form of significant experiences. At

Leipzig I had to take a furtive leave of Laube. At the instance of

Prussia he had been warned off Saxon soil, and he half guessed at the

meaning which was to be attached to this move. The time of undisguised

reaction against the Liberal movement of the early ‘thirties had set

in: the fact that Laube was concerned in no sort of political work, but

had devoted himself merely to literary activity, always aiming simply

at aesthetic objects, made the action of the police quite

incomprehensible to us for the time being. The disgusting ambiguity

with which the Leipzig authorities answered all his questions as to the

cause of his expulsion soon gave him the strongest suspicions as to

what their intentions towards him actually were.

Leipzig, as the scene of his literary labours, being inestimably

precious, it mattered greatly to him to keep within reach of it. My

friend Apel owned a fine estate on Prussian soil, within but a few

hours’ distance of Leipzig, and we conceived the wish of seeing Laube

hospitably harboured there. My friend, who without infringing the legal

stipulations was in a position to give the persecuted man a place of

refuge, immediately assented, and with great readiness, to our desire,

but confessed to us next day, after having communicated with his

family, that he thought he might incur some unpleasantnesses if he

entertained Laube. At this the latter smiled, and in a manner I shall

never forget, though I have noticed in the course of my life that the

expression which I then saw in his face was one which has often flitted

over my own features. He took his leave, and in a short time we heard

that he had been arrested, owing to having undertaken fresh proceedings

against former members of the Burschenschaft (Students’ League), and

had been lodged in the municipal prison at Berlin. I had thus had two

experiences which weighed me down like lead, so I packed my scanty

portmanteau, took leave of my mother and sister, and, with a stout

heart, started on my career as a conductor.

In order to be able to look upon the little room under Minna’s lodging

as my new home, I was forced also to make the best of Bethmann’s

theatrical enterprise. As a matter of fact, a performance of Don Juan

was given at once, for the director, who prided himself on being a

connoisseur of things artistic, suggested that opera to me as one with

which it would be wise for an aspiring young artist, of a good family,

to make his debut. Despite the fact that, apart from some of my own

instrumental compositions, I had never yet conducted, and least of all

in opera, the rehearsal and the performance went off fairly well. Only

once or twice did discrepancies appear in the recitative of Donna Anna;

yet this did not involve me in any kind of hostility, and when I took

my place unabashed and calm for the production of Lumpaci Vagabundus,

which I had practised very thoroughly, the people generally seemed to

have gained full confidence in the theatre’s new acquisition.

The fact that I submitted without bitterness and even with some

cheerfulness to this unworthy use of my musical talent, was due less to

my taste being at this period, as I called it, in its salad days, than

to my intercourse with Minna Planer, who was employed in that magic

trifle as the Amorous Fairy. Indeed, in the midst of this dust-cloud of

frivolity and vulgarity, she always seemed very much like a fairy, the

reasons of whose descent into this giddy whirl, which of a truth seemed

neither to carry her away nor even to affect her, remained an absolute

mystery. For while I could discover nothing in the opera singers save

the familiar stage caricatures and grimaces, this fair actress differed

wholly from those about her in her unaffected soberness and dainty

modesty, as also in the absence of all theatrical pretence and

stiltedness. There was only one young man whom I could place beside

Minna on the ground of qualities like those I recognised in her. This

fellow was Friedrich Schmitt, who had only just adopted the stage as a

career in the hope of making a ‘hit’ in opera, to which, as the

possessor of an excellent tenor voice, he felt himself called. He too

differed from the rest of the company, especially in the earnestness

which he brought to bear upon his studies and his work in general: the

soulful manly pitch of his chest voice, his clear, noble enunciation

and intelligent rendering of his words, have always remained as

standards in my memory. Owing to the fact that he was wholly devoid of

theatrical talent, and acted clumsily and awkwardly, a check was soon

put to his progress, but he always remained dear to me as a clever and

original man of trustworthy and upright character—my only associate.

But my dealings with my kind housemate soon became a cherished habit,

while she returned the ingenuously impetuous advances of the conductor

of one-and-twenty with a certain tolerant astonishment which, remote as

it was from all coquetry and ulterior motives, soon made familiar and

friendly intercourse possible with her. When, one evening, I returned

late to my ground-floor room, by climbing through the window, for I had

no latch-key, the noise of my entry brought Minna to her window just

over mine. Standing on my window ledge I begged her to allow me to bid

her good-night once more. She had not the slightest objection to this,

but declared it must be done from the window, as she always had her

door locked by the people of the house, and nobody could get in that

way. She kindly facilitated the handshake by leaning far out of her

window, so that I could take her hand as I stood on my ledge. When

later on I had an attack of erysipelas, from which I often suffered,

and with my face all swollen and frightfully distorted concealed myself

from the world in my gloomy room, Minna visited me repeatedly, nursed

me, and assured me that my distorted features did not matter in the

least. On recovering, I paid her a visit and complained of a rash that

had remained round my mouth, and which seemed so unpleasant that I

apologised for showing it to her. This also she made light of. Then I

inferred she would not give me a kiss, whereupon she at once gave me

practical proof that she did not shrink from that either.

This was all done with a friendly serenity and composure that had

something almost motherly about it, and it was free from all suggestion

of frivolity or of heartlessness. In a few weeks the company had to

leave Lauchstadt to proceed to Rudolstadt and fulfil a special

engagement there. I was particularly anxious to make this journey,

which in those days was an arduous undertaking, in Minna’s company, and

if only I had succeeded in getting my well-earned salary duly paid by

Bethmann, nothing would have hindered the fulfilment of my wish. But in

this matter I encountered exceptional difficulties, which in the course

of eventful years grew in chronic fashion into the strangest of

ailments. Even at Lauchstadt I had discovered that there was only one

man who drew his salary in full, namely the bass Kneisel, whom I had

seen smoking his pipe beside the couch of the director’s lame wife. I

was assured that if I cared greatly about getting some of my wages from

time to time, I could obtain this favour only by paying court to Mme.

Bethmann. This time I preferred once more to appeal to my family for

help, and therefore travelled to Rudolstadt through Leipzig, where, to

the sad astonishment of my mother, I had to replenish my coffer with

the necessary supplies. On the way to Leipzig I had travelled with Apel

through his estate, he having fetched me from Lauchstadt for the

purpose. His arrival was fixed in my memory by a noisy banquet which my

wealthy friend gave at the hotel in my honour. It was on this occasion

that I and one of the other guests succeeded in completely destroying a

huge, massively built Dutch-tile stove, such as we had in our room at

the inn. Next morning none of us could understand how it had happened.

It was on this journey to Rudolstadt that I first passed through

Weimar, where on a rainy day I strolled with curiosity, but without

emotion, towards Goethe’s house. I had pictured something rather

different, and thought I should experience livelier impressions from

the active theatre life of Rudolstadt, to which I felt strongly

attracted. In spite of the fact that I was not to be conductor myself,

this post having been entrusted to the leader of the royal orchestra,

who had been specially engaged for our performances, yet I was so fully

occupied with rehearsals for the many operas and musical comedies

required to regale the frivolous public of the principality that I

found no leisure for excursions into the charming regions of this

little land. In addition to these severe and ill-paid labours, two

passions held me chained during the six weeks of my stay in Rudolstadt.

These were, first, a longing to write the libretto of Liebesverbot; and

secondly, my growing attachment to Minna. It is true, I sketched out a

musical composition about this time, a symphony in E major, whose first

movement (3/4 time) I completed as a separate piece. As regards style

and design, this work was suggested by Beethoven’s Seventh and Eighth

Symphonies, and, so far as I can remember, I should have had no need to

be ashamed of it, had I been able to complete it, or keep the part I

had actually finished. But I had already begun at this time to form the

opinion that, to produce anything fresh and truly noteworthy in the

realm of symphony, and according to Beethoven’s methods, was an

impossibility. Whereas opera, to which I felt inwardly drawn, though I

had no real example I wished to copy, presented itself to my mind in

varied and alluring shapes as a most fascinating form of art. Thus,

amid manifold and passionate agitations, and in the few leisure hours

which were left to me, I completed the greater part of my operatic

poem, taking infinitely more pains, both as regards words and

versification, than with the text of my earlier Feen. Moreover, I found

myself possessed of incomparably greater assurance in the arrangement

and partial invention of situations than when writing that earlier

work.

On the other hand, I now began for the first time to experience the

cares and worries of a lover’s jealousy. A change, to me inexplicable,

manifested itself in Minna’s hitherto unaffected and gentle manner

towards me. It appears that my artless solicitations for her favour, by

which at that time I meant nothing serious, and in which a man of the

world would merely have seen the exuberance of a youthful and easily

satisfied infatuation, had given rise to certain remarks and comments

upon the popular actress. I was astonished to learn, first from her

reserved manner, and later from her own lips, that she felt compelled

to inquire into the seriousness of my intentions, and to consider their

consequences. She was at that time, as I had already discovered, on

very intimate terms with a young nobleman, whose acquaintance I first

made in Lauchstadt, where he used to visit her. I had already realised

on that occasion that he was unfeignedly and cordially attached to her;

in fact, in the circle of her friends she was regarded as engaged to

Herr von O., although it was obvious that marriage was out of the

question, as the young lover was quite without means, and owing to the

high standing of his family it was essential that he should sacrifice

himself to a marriage of convenience, both on account of his social

position and of the career which he would have to adopt. During this

stay at Rudolstadt Minna appears to have gathered certain information

on this point which troubled and depressed her, thus rendering her more

inclined to treat my impetuous attempts at courtship with cool reserve.

After mature deliberation I recognised that, in any case, Young Europe,

Ardinghello, and Liebesverbot could not be produced at Rudolstadt; but

it was a very different matter for the Fee Amorosa, with its merry

theatrical mood, and an Ehrlicher Burger Kind to seek a decent

livelihood. Therefore, greatly discouraged, I proceeded to accentuate

the more extravagant situations of my Liebesverbot by rioting with a

few comrades in the sausage-scented atmosphere of the Rudolstadt

Vogelwiese. At this time my troubles again brought me more or less into

contact with the vice of gambling, although on this occasion it only

cast temporary fetters about me in the very harmless form of the dice

and roulette-tables out on the open market-place.

We were looking forward to the time when we should leave Rudolstadt for

the half-yearly winter season at the capital, Magdeburg, mainly because

I should there resume my place at the head of the orchestra, and might

in any case count on a better reward for my musical efforts. But before

returning to Magdeburg I had to endure a trying interval at Bernburg,

where Bethmann, the director, in addition to his other undertakings,

had also promised sundry theatrical performances. During our brief stay

in the town I had to arrange for the presentation, with a mere fraction

of the company, of several operas, which were again to be conducted by

the royal conductor of the place. But in addition to these professional

labours, I had to endure such a meagre, ill-provided and grievously

farcical existence as was enough to disgust me, if not for ever, at any

rate for the time being, with the wretched profession of a theatrical

conductor. Yet I survived even this, and Magdeburg was destined to lead

me eventually to the real glory of my adopted profession.

The sensation of sitting in command at the very conductor’s desk from

which, not many years before, the great master Kuhnlein had so moved

the perplexed young enthusiast by the weighty wisdom of his musical

directorship, was not without its charm for me, and, indeed, I very

quickly succeeded in obtaining perfect confidence in conducting an

orchestra. I was soon a persona grata with the excellent musicians of

the orchestra. Their splendid combination in spirited overtures, which,

especially towards the finale, I generally took at an unheard-of speed,

often earned for us all the intoxicating applause of the public. The

achievements of my fiery and often exuberant zeal won me recognition

from the singers, and were greeted by the audience with rapturous

appreciation. As in Magdeburg, at least in those days, the art of

theatrical criticism was but slightly developed, this universal

satisfaction was a great encouragement, and at the end of the first

three months of my Magdeburg conductorship I felt sustained by the

flattering and comforting assurance that I was one of the bigwigs of

opera. Under these circumstances, Schmale, the stage manager, who has

been my good friend ever since, proposed a special gala performance for

New Year’s Day, which he felt sure would be a triumph. I was to compose

the necessary music. This was very speedily done; a rousing overture,

several melodramas and choruses were all greeted with enthusiasm, and

brought us such ample applause that we repeated the performance with

great success, although such repetitions after the actual gala day were

quite contrary to usage.

With the new year (1835) there came a decisive turning-point in my

life. After the rupture between Minna and myself at Rudolstadt, we had

been to some extent lost to one another; but our friendship was resumed

on our meeting again in Magdeburg; this time, however, it remained cool

and purposely indifferent. When she first appeared in the town, a year

before, her beauty had attracted considerable notice, and I now learned

that she was the object of great attention from several young noblemen,

and had shown herself not unmoved by the compliment implied by their

visits. Although her reputation, thanks to her absolute discretion and

self-respect, remained beyond reproach, my objection to her receiving

such attentions grew very strong, owing possibly, in some degree, to

the memory of the sorrows I had endured in Pachta’s house in Prague.

Although Minna assured me that the conduct of these gentlemen was much

more discreet and decent than that of theatre-goers of the bourgeois

class, and especially than that of certain young musical conductors,

she never succeeded in soothing the bitterness and insistence with

which I protested against her acceptance of such attentions. So we

spent three unhappy months in ever-increasing estrangement, and at the

same time, in half-frantic despair, I pretended to be fond of the most

undesirable associates, and acted in every way with such blatant levity

that Minna, as she told me afterwards, was filled with the deepest

anxiety and solicitude concerning me. Moreover, as the ladies of the

opera company were not slow to pay court to their youthful conductor,

and especially as one young woman, whose reputation was not spotless,

openly set her cap at me, this anxiety of Minna’s seems at last to have

culminated in a definite decision. I hit upon the idea of treating the

elite of our opera company to oysters and punch in my own room on New

Year’s Eve. The married couples were invited, and then came the

question whether Fraulein Planer would consent to take part in such a

festivity. She accepted quite ingenuously, and presented herself, as

neatly and becomingly dressed as ever, in my bachelor apartments, where

things soon grew pretty lively. I had already warned my landlord that

we were not likely to be very quiet, and reassured him as to any

possible damage to his furniture. What the champagne failed to

accomplish, the punch eventually succeeded in doing; all the restraints

of petty conventionality, which the company usually endeavoured to

observe, were cast aside, giving place to an unreserved demeanour all

round, to which no one objected. And then it was that Minna’s queenly

dignity distinguished her from all her companions. She never lost her

self-respect; and whilst no one ventured to take the slightest liberty

with her, every one very clearly recognised the simple candour with

which she responded to my kindly and solicitous attentions. They could

not fail to see that the link existing between us was not to be

compared to any ordinary liaison, and we had the satisfaction of seeing

the flighty young lady who had so openly angled for me fall into a fit

over the discovery.

From that time onward I remained permanently on the best of terms with

Minna. I do not believe that she ever felt any sort of passion or

genuine love for me, or, indeed, that she was capable of such a thing,

and I can therefore only describe her feeling for me as one of

heartfelt goodwill, and the sincerest desire for my success and

prosperity, inspired as she was with the kindest sympathy, and genuine

delight at, and admiration for, my talents. All this at last became

part of her nature. She obviously had a very favourable opinion of my

abilities, though she was surprised at the rapidity of my success. My

eccentric nature, which she knew so well how to humour pleasantly by

her gentleness, stimulated her to the continual exercise of the power,

so flattering to her own vanity, and without ever betraying any desire

or ardour herself, she never met my impetuous advances with coldness.

At the Magdeburg theatre I had already made the acquaintance of a very

interesting woman called Mme. Haas. She was an actress, no longer in

her first youth, and played so-called ‘chaperone’s parts.’ This lady

won my sympathy by telling me she had been friendly ever since her

youth with Laube, in whose destiny she continued to take a heartfelt

and cordial interest. She was clever, but far from happy, and an

unprepossessing exterior, which with the lapse of years grew more

uninviting, did not tend to make her any happier. She lived in meagre

circumstances, with one child, and appeared to remember her better days

with a bitter grief. My first visit to her was paid merely to inquire

after Laube’s fate, but I soon became a frequent and familiar caller.

As she and Minna speedily became fast friends, we three often spent

pleasant evenings talking together. But when, later on, a certain

jealousy manifested itself on the part of the elder woman towards the

younger, our confidential relations were more or less disturbed, for it

particularly grieved me to hear Minna’s talents and mental gifts

criticised by the other. One evening I had promised Minna to have tea

with her and Mme. Haas, but I had thoughtlessly promised to go to a

whist party first. This engagement I purposely prolonged, much as it

wearied me, in the deliberate hope that her companion—who had already

grown irksome to me—might have left before my arrival. The only way in

which I could do this was by drinking hard, so that I had the very

unusual experience of rising from a sober whist party in a completely

fuddled condition, into which I had imperceptibly fallen, and in which

I refused to believe. This incredulity deluded me into keeping my

engagement for tea, although it was so late. To my intense disgust the

elder woman was still there when I arrived, and her presence at once

had the effect of rousing my tipsiness to a violent outbreak; for she

seemed astonished at my rowdy and unseemly behaviour, and made several

remarks upon it intended for jokes, whereupon I scoffed at her in the

coarsest manner, so that she immediately left the house in high

dudgeon. I had still sense enough to be conscious of Minna’s astonished

laughter at my outrageous conduct. As soon as she realised, however,

that my condition was such as to render my removal impossible without

great commotion, she rapidly formed a resolution which must indeed have

cost her an effort, though it was carried out with the utmost calmness

and good-humour. She did all she could for me, and procured me the

necessary relief, and when I sank into a heavy slumber, unhesitatingly

resigned her own bed to my use. There I slept until awakened by the

wonderful grey of dawn. On recognising where I was, I at once realised

and grew ever more convinced of the fact that this morning’s sunrise

marked the starting-point of an infinitely momentous period of my life.

The demon of care had at last entered into my existence.

Without any light-hearted jests, without gaiety or joking of any

description, we breakfasted quietly and decorously together, and at an

hour when, in view of the compromising circumstances of the previous

evening, we could set out without attracting undue notice, I set off

with Minna for a long walk beyond the city gates. Then we parted, and

from that day forward freely and openly gratified our desires as an

acknowledged pair of lovers.

The peculiar direction which my musical activities had gradually taken

continued to receive ever fresh impetus, not only from the successes,

but also from the disasters which about this time befell my efforts. I

produced the overture to my Feen with very satisfactory results at a

concert given by the Logengesellschaft, and thereby earned considerable

applause. On the other hand, news came from Leipzig confirming the

shabby action of the directors of the theatre in that place with regard

to the promised presentation of this opera. But, happily for me, I had

begun the music for my Liebesverbot, an occupation which so absorbed my

thoughts that I lost all interest in the earlier work, and abstained

with proud indifference from all further effort to secure its

performance in Leipzig. The success of its overture alone amply repaid

me for the composition of my first opera.

Meanwhile, in spite of numerous other distractions, I found time,

during the brief six months of this theatrical season in Magdeburg, to

complete a large portion of my new opera, besides doing other work. I

ventured to introduce two duets from it at a concert given in the

theatre, and their reception encouraged me to proceed hopefully with

the rest of the opera.

During the second half of this season my friend Apel came to sun

himself enthusiastically in the splendour of my musical directorship.

He had written a drama, Columbus, which I recommended to our management

for production. This was a peculiarly easy favour to win, as Apel

volunteered to have a new scene, representing the Alhambra, painted at

his own expense. Besides this, he proposed to effect many welcome

improvements in the condition of the actors taking part in his play;

for, owing to the continued preference displayed by the directress for

Kneisel, the bass, they had all suffered very much from uncertainty

about their wages. The piece itself appeared to me to contain much that

was good. It described the difficulties and struggles of the great

navigator before he set sail on his first voyage of discovery. The

drama ended with the momentous departure of his ships from the harbour

of Palos, an episode whose results are known to all the world. At my

desire Apel submitted his play to my uncle Adolph, and even in his

critical opinion it was remarkable for its lively and characteristic

popular scenes. On the other hand, a love romance, which he had woven

into the plot, struck me as unnecessary and dull. In addition to a

brief chorus for some Moors who were expelled from Granada, to be sung

on their departure from the familiar home country, and a short

orchestral piece by way of conclusion, I also dashed off an overture

for my friend’s play. I sketched out the complete draft of this one

evening at Minna’s house, while Apel was left free to talk to her as

much and as loudly as he liked. The effect this composition was

calculated to produce rested on a fundamental idea which was quite

simple, yet startling in its development. Unfortunately I worked it out

rather hurriedly. In not very carefully chosen phrasing the orchestra

was to represent the ocean, and, as far as might be, the ship upon it.

A forcible, pathetically yearning and aspiring theme was the only

comprehensible idea amid the swirl of enveloping sound. When the whole

had been repeated, there was a sudden jump to a different theme in

extreme pianissimo, accompanied by the swelling vibrations of the first

violins, which was intended to represent a Fata Morgana. I had secured

three pairs of trumpets in different keys, in order to produce this

exquisite, gradually dawning and seductive theme with the utmost

niceties of shade and variety of modulation. This was intended to

represent the land of desire towards which the hero’s eyes are turned,

and whose shores seem continually to rise before him only to sink

elusively beneath the waves, until at last they soar in very deed above

the western horizon, the crown of all his toil and search, and stand

clearly and unmistakably revealed to all the sailors, a vast continent

of the future. My six trumpets were now to combine in one key, in order

that the theme assigned to them might re-echo in glorious jubilation.

Familiar as I was with the excellence of the Prussian regimental

trumpeters, I could rely upon a startling effect, especially in this

concluding passage. My overture astonished every one, and was

tumultuously applauded. The play itself, however, was acted without

dignity. A conceited comedian, named Ludwig Meyer, completely ruined

the title part, for which he excused himself on the ground that, having

to act as stage manager also, he had been unable to commit his lines to

memory. Nevertheless, he managed to enrich his wardrobe with several

splendid costumes at Apel’s expense, wearing them, as Columbus, one

after the other. At all events, Apel had lived to see a play of his own

actually performed, and although this was never repeated, yet it

afforded me an opportunity of increasing my personal popularity with

the people of Magdeburg, as the overture was several times repeated at

concerts by special request.

But the chief event of this theatrical season occurred towards its

close. I induced Mme. Schroder-Devrient, who was staying in Leipzig, to

come to us for a few special performances, when, on two occasions, I

had the great satisfaction and stimulating experience of myself

conducting the operas in which she sang, and thus entering into

immediate artistic collaboration with her. She appeared as Desdemona

and Romeo. In the latter role particularly she surpassed herself, and

kindled a fresh flame in my breast. This visit brought us also into

closer personal contact. So kindly disposed and sympathetic did she

show herself towards me, that she even volunteered to lend me her

services at a concert which I proposed to give for my own benefit,

although this would necessitate her returning after a brief absence.

Under circumstances so auspicious I could only expect the best possible

results from my concert, and in my situation at that time its proceeds

were a matter of vital importance to me. My scanty salary from the

Magdeburg opera company had become altogether illusory, being paid only

in small and irregular instalments, so that I could see but one way of

meeting my daily expenses. These included frequent entertainment of a

large circle of friends, consisting of singers and players, and the

situation had become unpleasantly accentuated by no small number of

debts. True, I did not know their exact amount; but reckoned that I

could at least form an advantageous, if indefinite, estimate of the sum

to be realized by my concert, whereby the two unknown quantities might

balance each other. I therefore consoled my creditors with the tale of

these fabulous receipts, which were to pay them all in full the day

after the concert. I even went so far as to invite them to come and be

paid at the hotel to which I had moved at the close of the season.

And, indeed, there was nothing unreasonable in my counting on the

highest imaginable receipts, when supported by so great and popular a

singer, who, moreover, was returning to Magdeburg on purpose for the

event. I consequently acted with reckless prodigality as regards cost,

launching out into all manner of musical extravagance, such as engaging

an excellent and much larger orchestra, and arranging many rehearsals.

Unfortunately for me, however, nobody would believe that such a famous

actress, whose time was so precious, would really return again to

please a little Magdeburg conductor. My pompous announcement of her

appearance was almost universally regarded as a deceitful manœuvre, and

people took offence at the high prices charged for seats. The result

was that the hall was only very scantily filled, a fact which

particularly grieved me on account of my generous patroness. Her

promise I had never doubted. Punctually on the day appointed she

reappeared to support me, and now had the painful and unaccustomed

experience of performing before a small audience. Fortunately, she

treated the matter with great good-humour (which, I learned later, was

prompted by other motives, not personally concerning me). Among several

pieces she sang Beethoven’s Adelaïde most exquisitely, wherein, to my

own astonishment, I accompanied her on the piano. But, alas! another

and more unexpected mishap befell my concert, through our unfortunate

selection of pieces. Owing to the excessive reverberation of the saloon

in the Hotel ‘The City of London,’ the noise was unbearable. My

Columbus Overture, with its six trumpets, had early in the evening

filled the audience with terror; and now, at the end, came Beethoven’s

Schlacht bei Vittoria, for which, in enthusiastic expectation of

limitless receipts, I had provided every imaginable orchestral luxury.

The firing of cannon and musketry was organised with the utmost

elaboration, on both the French and English sides, by means of

specially constructed and costly apparatus; while trumpets and bugles

had been doubled and trebled. Then began a battle, such as has seldom

been more cruelly fought in a concert-room. The orchestra flung itself,

so to speak, upon the scanty audience with such an overwhelming

superiority of numbers that the latter speedily gave up all thought of

resistance and literally took to flight. Mme. Schroder-Devrient had

kindly taken a front seat, that she might hear the concert to an end.

Much as she may have been inured to terrors of this kind, this was more

than she could stand, even out of friendship for me. When, therefore,

the English made a fresh desperate assault upon the French position,

she took to flight, almost wringing her hands. Her action became the

signal for a panic-stricken stampede. Every one rushed out; and

Wellington’s victory was finally celebrated in a confidential outburst

between myself and the orchestra alone. Thus ended this wonderful

musical festival. Schroder-Devrient at once departed, deeply regretting

the ill-success of her well-meant effort, and kindly left me to my

fate. After seeking comfort in the arms of my sorrowing sweetheart, and

attempting to nerve myself for the morrow’s battle, which did not seem

likely to end in a victorious symphony, I returned next morning to the

hotel. I found I could only reach my rooms by running the gauntlet

between long rows of men and women in double file, who had all been

specially invited thither for the settlement of their respective

affairs. Reserving the right to select individuals from among my

visitors for separate interview, I first of all led in the second

trumpeter of the orchestra, whose duty it had been to look after the

cash and the music. From his account I learned that, owing to the high

fees which, in my generous enthusiasm, I had promised to the orchestra,

a few more shillings and sixpences would still have to come out of my

own pocket to meet these charges alone. When this was settled, the

position of affairs was plain. The next person I invited to come in was

Mme. Gottschalk, a trustworthy Jewess, with whom I wanted to come to

some arrangement respecting the present crisis. She perceived at once

that more than ordinary help was required in this case, but did not

doubt that I should be able to obtain it from my opulent connections in

Leipzig. She undertook, therefore, to appease the other creditors with

tranquillising assurances, and railed, or pretended to rail, against

their indecent conduct with great vigour. Thus at last we succeeded,

though not without some difficulty, in making the corridor outside my

door once more passable.

The theatrical season was now over, our company on the point of

dissolution, and I myself free from my appointment. But meanwhile the

unhappy director of our theatre had passed from a state of chronic to

one of acute bankruptcy. He paid with paper money, that is to say, with

whole sheets of box-tickets for performances which he guaranteed should

take place. By dint of great craft Minna managed to extract some profit

even from these singular treasury-bonds. She was living at this time

most frugally and economically. Moreover, as the dramatic company still

continued its efforts on behalf of its members—only the opera troupe

having been dissolved—she remained at the theatre. Thus, when I started

out on my compulsory return to Leipzig, she saw me off with hearty

good-wishes for our speedy reunion, promising to spend the next

holidays in visiting her parents in Dresden, on which occasion she

hoped also to look me up in Leipzig.

Thus it came about that early in May I once more went home to my own

folk, in order that after this abortive first attempt at civic

independence, I might finally lift the load of debt with which my

efforts in Magdeburg had burdened me. An intelligent brown poodle

faithfully accompanied me, and was entrusted to my family for food and

entertainment as the only visible property I had acquired.

Nevertheless, my mother and Rosalie succeeded in founding good hopes

for my future career upon the bare fact of my being able to conduct an

orchestra. To me, on the other hand, the thought of returning once more

to my former life with my family was very discomfiting. My relation to

Minna in particular spurred me on to resume my interrupted career as

speedily as possible. The great change which had come over me in this

respect was more apparent than ever when Minna spent a few days with me

in Leipzig on her way home. Her familiar and genial presence proclaimed

that my days of parental dependence were past and gone. We discussed

the renewal of my Magdeburg engagement, and I promised her an early

visit in Dresden. I obtained permission from my mother and sister to

invite her one evening to tea, and in this way I introduced her to my

family. Rosalie saw at once how matters stood with me, but made no

further use of the discovery than to tease me about being in love. To

her the affair did not appear dangerous; but to me things wore a very

different aspect, for this love-lorn attachment was entirely in keeping

with my independent spirit, and my ambition to win myself a place in

the world of art.

My distaste for Leipzig itself was furthermore strengthened by a change

which occurred there at this time in the realm of music. At the very

time that I, in Magdeburg, was attempting to make my reputation as a

musical conductor by thoughtless submission to the frivolous taste of

the day, Mendelssohn-Bartholdy was conducting the Gewandhaus concerts,

and inaugurating a momentous epoch for himself and the musical taste of

Leipzig. His influence had put an end to the simple ingenuousness with

which the Leipzig public had hitherto judged the productions of its

sociable subscription concerts. Through the influence of my good old

friend Pohlenz, who was not yet altogether laid on the shelf, I managed

to produce my Columbus Overture at a benefit concert given by the

favourite young singer, Livia Gerhart. But, to my amazement, I found

that the taste of the musical public in Leipzig had been given a

different bent, which not even my rapturously applauded overture, with

its brilliant combination of six trumpets, could influence. This

experience deepened my dislike of everything approaching a classical

tone, in which sentiment I found myself in complete accord with honest

Pohlenz, who sighed good-naturedly over the downfall of the good old

times.

Arrangements for a musical festival at Dessau, under Friedrich

Schneider’s conductorship, offered me a welcome chance of quitting

Leipzig. For this journey, which could be performed on foot in seven

hours, I had to procure a passport for eight days. This document was

destined to play an important part in my life for many years to come;

for on several occasions and in various European countries it was the

only paper I possessed to prove my identity. In fact, owing to my

evasion of military duty in Saxony, I never again succeeded in

obtaining a regular pass until I was appointed musical conductor in

Dresden. I derived very little artistic pleasure or benefit of any kind

from this occasion; on the contrary, it gave a fresh impetus to my

hatred of the classical. I heard Beethoven’s Symphony in C minor

conducted by a man whose physiognomy, resembling that of a drunken

satyr, filled me with unconquerable disgust. In spite of an

interminable row of contrabassi, with which a conductor usually

coquettes at musical festivals, his performance was so expressionless

and inane that I turned away in disgust as from an alarming and

repulsive problem, and desisted from all attempts to explain the

impassable gulf which, as I again perceived, yawned between my own

vivid and imaginative conception of this work and the only living

presentations of it which I had ever heard. But for the present my

tormented spirits were cheered and calmed by hearing the classical

Schneider’s oratorio Absalom rendered as an absolute burlesque.

It was in Dessau that Minna had made her first debut on the stage, and

while there I heard her spoken of by frivolous young men in the tone

usual in such circles when discussing young and beautiful actresses. My

eagerness in contradicting this chatter and confounding the

scandalmongers revealed to me more clearly than ever the strength of

the passion which drew me to her.

I therefore returned to Leipzig without calling on my relatives, and

there procured means for an immediate journey to Dresden. On the way

(the journey was still performed by express coach) I met Minna,

accompanied by one of her sisters, already on the way back to

Magdeburg. Promptly procuring a posting ticket for the return journey

to Leipzig, I actually set off thither with my dear girl; but by the

time we reached the next station I had succeeded in persuading her to

turn back with me to Dresden. By this time the mail-coach was far ahead

of us, and we had to travel by special post-chaise. This lively

bustling to and fro seemed to astonish the two girls, and put them into

high spirits. The extravagance of my conduct had evidently roused them

to the expectation of adventures, and it now behoved me to fulfil this

expectation. Procuring from a Dresden acquaintance the necessary cash,

I conducted my two lady friends through the Saxon Alps, where we spent

several right merry days of innocent and youthful gaiety. Only once was

this disturbed by a passing fit of jealousy on my part, for which,

indeed, there was no occasion, but which fed itself in my heart on a

nervous apprehension of the future, and upon the experience I had

already gained of womenkind. Yet, despite this blot, our excursion

still lingers in my memory as the sweetest and almost sole remembrance

of unalloyed happiness in the whole of my life as a young man. One

evening in particular stands out in bright relief, during which we sat

together almost all night at the watering-place of Schandau in glorious

summer weather. Indeed, my subsequent long and anxious connection with

Minna, interwoven as it was with the most painful and bitter

vicissitudes, has often appeared to me as a persistently prolonged

expiation of the brief and harmless enjoyment of those few days.

After accompanying Minna to Leipzig, whence she continued her journey

to Magdeburg, I presented myself to my family, but told them nothing of

my Dresden excursion. I now braced my energies, as though under the

stern compulsion of a strange and deep sense of duty, to the task of

making such arrangements as would speedily restore me to my dear one’s

side. To this end a fresh engagement had to be negotiated with Director

Bethmann for the coming winter season. Unable to await the conclusion

of our contract in Leipzig, I availed myself of Laube’s presence at the

baths in Kosen, near Naumburg, to pay him a visit. Laube had only

recently been discharged from the Berlin municipal gaol, after a

tormenting inquisition of nearly a year’s duration. On giving his

parole not to leave the country until the verdict had been given, he

had been permitted to retire to Kosen, from which place he, one

evening, paid us a secret visit in Leipzig. I can still call his

woebegone appearance to mind. He seemed hopelessly resigned, though he

spoke cheerfully with regard to all his earlier dreams of better

things; and owing to my own worries at that time about the critical

state of my affairs, this impression still remains one of my saddest

and most painful recollections. While at Kosen I showed him a good many

of the verses for my Liebesverbot, and although he spoke coldly of my

presumption in wishing to write my own libretto, I was slightly

encouraged by his appreciation of my work.

Meanwhile I impatiently awaited letters from Magdeburg. Not that I had

any doubt as to the renewal of my engagement; on the contrary, I had

every reason to regard myself as a good acquisition for Bethmann; but I

felt as though nothing which tended to bring me nearer to Minna could

move fast enough. As soon as I received the necessary tidings, I

hurried away to make all needful arrangements on the spot for ensuring

a magnificent success in the coming Magdeburg operatic season.

Through the tireless munificence of the King of Prussia fresh and final

assistance had been granted to our perennially bankrupt theatrical

director. His Majesty had assigned a not inconsiderable sum to a

committee consisting of substantial Magdeburg citizens, as a subsidy to

be expended on the theatre under Bethmann’s management. What this

meant, and the respect with which I thereupon regarded the artistic

conditions of Magdeburg, may be best imagined if one remembers the

neglected and forlorn surroundings amid which such provincial theatres

usually drag out their lives. I offered at once to undertake a long

journey in search of good operatic singers. I said I would find the

means for this at my own risk, and the only guarantee I demanded from

the management for eventual reimbursement was that they should assign

me the proceeds of a future benefit performance. This offer was gladly

accepted, and in pompous tones the director furnished me with the

necessary powers, and moreover gave me his parting blessing. During

this brief interval I lived once more in intimate communion with

Minna—who now had her mother with her—and then took fresh leave of her

for my venturesome enterprise.

But when I got to Leipzig I found it by no means easy to procure the

funds, so confidently counted on when in Magdeburg, for the expenses of

my projected journey. The glamour of the royal protection of Prussia

for our theatrical undertaking, which I portrayed in the liveliest

colours to my good brother-in-law Brockhaus, quite failed to dazzle

him, and it was at the cost of great pains and humiliation that I

finally got my ship of discovery under weigh.

I was naturally drawn first of all to my old wonderland of Bohemia.

There I merely touched at Prague and, without visiting my lovely lady

friends, I hurried forward so that I might first sample the opera

company then playing for the season at Karlsbad. Impatient to discover

as many talents as I could as soon as possible, so as not to exhaust my

funds to no purpose, I attended a performance of La Dame Blanche,

sincerely hoping to find the whole performance first class. But not

until much later did I fully realise how wretched was the quality of

all these singers. I selected one of them, a bass named Graf, who was

singing Gaveston. When in due course he made his debut at Magdeburg, he

provoked so much well-founded dissatisfaction, that I could not find a

word to say in reply to the mockery which this acquisition brought upon

me.

But the small success with which the real object of my tour was

attended was counterbalanced by the pleasantness of the journey itself.

The trip through Eger, over the Fichtel mountains, and the entry into

Bayreuth, gloriously illuminated by the setting sun, have remained

happy memories to this day.

My next goal was Nuremberg, where my sister Clara and her husband were

acting, and from whom I might reckon on sound information as to the

object of my search. It was particularly nice to be hospitably received

in my sister’s house, where I hoped to revive my somewhat exhausted

means of travel. In this hope I reckoned chiefly upon the sale of a

snuff-box presented to me by a friend, which I had secret reasons to

suppose was made of platinum. To this I could add a gold signet-ring,

given me by my friend Apel for composing the overture to his Columbus.

The value of the snuff-box unfortunately proved to be entirely

imaginary; but by pawning these two jewels, the only ones I had left, I

hoped to provide myself with the bare necessaries for continuing my

journey to Frankfort. It was to this place and the Rhine district that

the information I had gathered led me to direct my steps. Before

leaving I persuaded my sister and brother-in-law to accept engagements

in Magdeburg; but I still lacked a first tenor and a soprano, whom

hitherto I had altogether failed to discover.

My stay in Nuremberg was most agreeably prolonged through a renewed

meeting with Schroder-Devrient, who just at that time was fulfilling a

short engagement in that town. Meeting her again was like seeing the

clouds disperse, which, since our last meeting, had darkened my

artistic horizon.

The Nuremberg operatic company had a very limited repertoire. Besides

Fidelio they could produce nothing save Die Schweizerfamilie, a fact

about which this great singer complained, as this was one of her first

parts sung in early youth, for which she was hardly any longer suited,

and which, in addition, she had played ad nauseam. I also looked

forward to the performance of Die Schweizerfamilie with misgivings, and

even with anxiety, for I feared lest this tame opera and the

old-fashioned sentimental part of Emmeline would weaken the great

impression the public, as well as myself, had formed up to that moment

of the work of this sublime artist. Imagine, therefore, how deeply

moved and astonished I was, on the evening of the performance, to find

that it was in this very part that I first realised the truly

transcendental genius of this extraordinary woman. That anything so

great as her interpretation of the character of the Swiss maiden could

not be handed down to posterity as a monument for all time can only be

looked upon as one of the most sublime sacrifices demanded by dramatic

art, and as one of its highest manifestations. When, therefore, such

phenomena appear, we cannot hold them in too great reverence, nor look

upon them as too sacred.

Apart from all these new experiences which were to become of so much

value to my whole life and to my artistic development, the impressions

I received at Nuremberg, though they were apparently trivial in their

origin, left such indelible traces on my mind, that they revived within

me later on, though in quite a different and novel form.

My brother-in-law, Wolfram, was a great favourite with the Nuremberg

theatrical world; he was witty and sociable, and as such made himself

much liked in theatrical circles. On this occasion I received

singularly delightful proofs of the spirit of extravagant gaiety

manifested on these evenings at the inn, in which I also took part. A

master carpenter, named Lauermann, a little thick-set man, no longer

young, of comical appearance and gifted only with the roughest dialect,

was pointed out to me in one of the inns visited by our friends as one

of those oddities who involuntarily contributed most to the amusement

of the local wags. Lauermann, it seems, imagined himself an excellent

singer, and as a result of this presumption, evinced interest only in

those in whom he thought he recognised a like talent. In spite of the

fact that, owing to this singular peculiarity, he became the butt of

constant jest and scornful mockery, he never failed to appear every

evening among his laughter-loving persecutors. So often had he been

laughed at and hurt by their scorn, that it became very difficult to

persuade him to give a display of his artistic skill, and this at last

could only be effected by artfully devised traps, so laid as to appeal

to his vanity. My arrival as an unknown stranger was utilised for a

manœuvre of this kind. How poor was the opinion they held of the

unfortunate mastersinger’s judgment was revealed when, to my great

amazement, my brother-in-law introduced me to him as the great Italian

singer, Lablache. To his credit I must confess that Lauermann surveyed

me for a long time with incredulous distrust, and commented with

cautious suspicion on my juvenile appearance, but especially on the

evidently tenor character of my voice. But the whole art of these

tavern associates and their principal enjoyment consisted in leading

this poor enthusiast to believe the incredible, a task on which they

spared neither time nor pains.

My brother-in-law succeeded in making the carpenter believe that I,

while receiving fabulous sums for my performances, wished by a singular

act of dissimulation, and by visiting public inns, to withdraw from the

general public; and that, moreover, when it came to a meeting between

‘Lauermann’ and ‘Lablache,’ the only real interest could be to hear

Lauermann and not Lablache, seeing that the former had nothing to learn

from the latter, but only Lablache from him. So singular was the

conflict between incredulity, on the one hand, and keenly excited

vanity on the other, that finally the poor carpenter became really

attractive to me. I began to play the role assigned me with all the

skill I could command, and after a couple of hours, which were relieved

by the strangest antics, we at last gained our end. The wondrous

mortal, whose flashing eyes had long been fixed on me in the greatest

excitement, worked his muscles in the peculiarly fantastic fashion

which we are accustomed to associate with a music-making automaton, the

mechanism of which has been duly wound up: his lips quivered, his teeth

gnashed, his eyes rolled convulsively, until finally there broke forth,

in a hoarse oily voice, an uncommonly trivial street-ballad. Its

delivery, accompanied by a regular movement of his outstretched thumbs

behind the ears, and during which his fat face glowed the brightest

red, was unhappily greeted with a wild burst of laughter from all

present, which excited the unlucky master to the most furious wrath.

With studied cruelty this wrath was greeted by those, who until then

had shamelessly flattered him, with the most extravagant mockery, until

the poor wretch at last absolutely foamed with rage.

As he was leaving the inn amid a hail of curses from his infamous

friends, an impulse of genuine pity prompted me to follow him, that I

might beg his forgiveness and seek in some way to pacify him, a task

all the more difficult since he was especially bitter against me as the

latest of his enemies, and the one who had so deeply deceived his eager

hope of hearing the genuine Lablache. Nevertheless, I succeeded in

stopping him on the threshold; and now the riotous company silently

entered into an extraordinary conspiracy to induce Lauermann to sing

again that very evening. How they managed this I can as little remember

as I can call to mind the effect of the spirituous liquors I imbibed.

In any case, I suspect that drink must eventually have been the means

of subduing Lauermann, just as it also rendered my own recollections of

the wonderful events of that prolonged evening at the inn extremely

vague. After Lauermann had for the second time suffered the same

mockery, the whole company felt itself bound to accompany the unhappy

man to his home. They carried him thither in a wheelbarrow, which they

found outside the house, and in this he arrived, in triumph, at his own

door, in one of those marvellous narrow alleys peculiar to the old

city. Frau Lauermann, who was aroused from slumber to receive her

husband, enabled us, by her torrent of curses, to form some idea of the

nature of their marital and domestic relations. Mockery of her

husband’s vocal talents was with her also a familiar theme; but to this

she now added the most dreadful reproaches for the worthless scamps

who, by encouraging him in this delusion, kept him from profitably

following his trade, and even led him to such scenes as the present

one. Thereupon the pride of the suffering mastersinger reasserted

itself; for while his wife painfully assisted him to mount the stairs,

he harshly denied her right to sit in judgment upon his vocal gifts,

and sternly ordered her to be silent. But even now this wonderful

night-adventure was by no means over. The entire swarm moved once more

in the direction of the inn. Before the house, however, we found a

number of fellows congregated, among them several workmen, against

whom, owing to police regulations as to closing hours, the doors were

shut. But the regular guests of the house, who were of our party, and

who were on terms of old friendship with the host, thought that it was

nevertheless permissible and possible to demand entrance. The host was

troubled at having to bar his door against friends, whose voices he

recognised; yet it was necessary to prevent the new arrivals from

forcing a way in with them. Out of this situation a mighty confusion

arose, which, what with shouting and clamour and an inexplicable growth

in the number of the disputants, soon assumed a truly demoniacal

character. It seemed to me as though in a few moments the whole town

would break into a tumult, and I thought I should once more have to

witness a revolution, the real origin of which no man could comprehend.

Then suddenly I heard some one fall, and, as though by magic, the whole

mass scattered in every direction. One of the regular guests, who was

familiar with an ancient Nuremberg boxing trick, desiring to put an end

to the interminable riot and to cut his way home through the crowd,

gave one of the noisiest shouters a blow with his fist between the

eyes, laying him senseless on the ground, though without seriously

injuring him. And this it was that so speedily broke up the whole

throng. Within little more than a minute of the most violent uproar of

hundreds of human voices, my brother-in-law and I were able to stroll

arm-in-arm through the moonlit streets, quietly jesting and laughing,

on our way home; and then it was that, to my amazement and relief, he

informed me that he was accustomed to this sort of life every evening.

At last, however, it became necessary seriously to attend to the

purpose of my journey. Only in passing did I touch at Wurzburg for a

day. I remember nothing of the meeting with my relations and

acquaintance beyond the melancholy visit to Friederike Galvani already

mentioned. On reaching Frankfort I was obliged to seek at once the

shelter of a decent hotel, in order to await there the result of my

solicitations for subsidies from the directorate of the Magdeburg

theatre. My hopes of securing the real stars of our operatic

undertaking were formed with a view to a season at Wiesbaden, where, I

was told, a good operatic company was on the point of dissolution. I

found it extremely difficult to arrange the short journey thither; yet

I managed to be present at a rehearsal of Robert der Teufel, in which

the tenor Freimuller distinguished himself. I interviewed him at once,

and found him willing to entertain my proposals for Magdeburg. We

concluded the necessary agreement, and I then returned with all speed

to my headquarters, the Weidenbusch Hotel in Frankfort. There I had to

spend another anxious week, during which I waited in vain for the

necessary travelling expenses to arrive from Magdeburg. To kill time I

had recourse, among other things, to a large red pocket-book which I

carried about with me in my portmanteau, and in which I entered, with

exact details of dates, etc., notes for my future biography—the

selfsame book which now lies before me to freshen my memory, and which

I have ever since added to at various periods of my life, without

leaving any gaps. Through the neglect of the Magdeburg managers my

situation, which was already serious, became literally desperate, when

I made an acquisition in Frankfort which gave me almost more pleasure

than I was able to bear. I had been present at a production of the

Zauberflote under the direction of Guhr, then wonderfully renowned as

‘a conductor of genius,’ and was agreeably surprised at the truly

excellent quality of the company. It was, of course, useless to think

of luring one of the leading stars into my net; on the other hand, I

saw clearly enough that the youthful Fraulein Limbach, who sang the

‘first boy’s’ part, possessed a desirable talent. She accepted my offer

of an engagement, and, indeed, seemed so anxious to be rid of her

Frankfort engagement that she resolved to escape from it

surreptitiously. She revealed her plans to me, and begged me to assist

her in carrying them out; for, inasmuch as the directors might get wind

of the affair, there was no time to lose. At all events, the young lady

assumed that I had abundant credit, supplied for my official business

journey by the Magdeburg theatre committee, whose praises I had so

diligently sung. But already I had been compelled to pledge my scanty

travelling gear in order to provide for my own departure. To this point

I had persuaded the host, but now found him by no means inclined to

advance me the additional funds needed for carrying off a young singer.

To cloak the bad behaviour of my directors I was compelled to invent

some tale of misfortune, and to leave the astonished and indignant

young lady behind. Heartily ashamed of this adventure, I travelled

through rain and storm via Leipzig, where I picked up my brown poodle,

and reaching Magdeburg, there resumed my work as musical director on

the 1st of September.

The result of my business labours gave me but little joy. The director,

it is true, proved triumphantly that he had sent five whole golden

louis to my address in Frankfort, and that my tenor and the youthful

lady-singer had also been provided with proper contracts, but not with

the fares and advances demanded. Neither of them came; only the basso

Graf arrived with pedantic punctuality from Karlsbad, and immediately

provoked the chaff of our theatrical wags. He sang at a rehearsal of

the Schweizerfamilie with such a schoolmasterly drone that I completely

lost my composure. The arrival of my excellent brother-in-law Wolfram

with my sister Clara was of more advantage for musical comedy than for

grand opera, and caused me considerable trouble into the bargain; for,

being honest folk and used to decent living, they speedily perceived

that, in spite of royal protection, the condition of the theatre was

but very insecure, as was natural under so unscrupulous a management as

that of Bethmann, and recognised with alarm that they had seriously

compromised their family position. My courage had already begun to sink

when a happy chance brought us a young woman, Mme. Pollert (nee

Zeibig), who was passing through Magdeburg with her husband, an actor,

in order to fulfil a special engagement in that town; she was gifted

with a beautiful voice, was a talented singer, and well suited for the

chief roles. Necessity had at last driven the directors to action, and

at the eleventh hour they sent for the tenor Freimuller. But I was

particularly gratified when the love which had arisen between him and

young Limbach in Frankfort enabled the enterprising tenor to carry away

this singer, to whom I had behaved so miserably. Both arrived radiant

with joy. Along with them we engaged Mme. Pollert, who, in spite of her

pretentiousness, met with favour from the public. A well-trained and

musically competent baritone, Herr Krug, afterwards the conductor of a

choir in Karlsruhe, had also been discovered, so that all at once I

stood at the head of a really good operatic company, among which the

basso Graf could be fitted in only with great difficulty, by being kept

as much as possible in the background. We succeeded quickly with a

series of operatic performances which were by no means ordinary, and

our repertory included everything of this nature that had ever been

written for the theatre. I was particularly pleased with the

presentation of Spohr’s Jessonda, which was truly not without

sublimity, and raised us high in the esteem of all cultured lovers of

music. I was untiring in my endeavours to discover some means of

elevating our performances above the usual level of excellence

compatible with the meagre resources of provincial theatres. I

persistently fell foul of the director Bethmann by strengthening my

orchestra, which he had to pay; but, on the other hand, I won his

complete goodwill by strengthening the chorus and the theatre music,

which cost him nothing, and which lent such splendour to our

presentations that subscriptions and audiences increased enormously.

For instance, I secured the regimental band, and also the military

singers, who in the Prussian army are admirably organised, and who

assisted in our performances in return for free passes to the gallery

granted to their relatives. Thus I managed to furnish with the utmost

completeness the specially strong orchestral accompaniment demanded by

the score of Bellini’s Norma, and was able to dispose of a body of male

voices for the impressive unison portion of the male chorus in the

introduction of that work such as even the greatest theatres could

rarely command. In later years I was able to assure Auber, whom I often

met over an ice in Tortoni’s cafe in Paris, that in his Lestocq I had

been able to render the part of the mutinous soldiery, when seduced

into conspiracy, with an absolutely full number of voices, a fact for

which he thanked me with astonishment and delight.

Amid such circumstances of encouragement the composition of my

Liebesverbot made rapid strides towards completion. I intended the

presentation of this piece for the benefit performance which had been

promised me as a means of defraying my expenses, and I worked hard in

the hope of improving my reputation, and at the same time of

accomplishing something by no means less desirable, and that was the

betterment of my financial position. Even the few hours which I could

snatch from business to spend at Minna’s side were devoted with

unexampled zeal to the completion of my score. My diligence moved even

Minna’s mother, who looked with some uneasiness upon our love affair.

She had remained over the summer on a visit to her daughter, and

managed the house for her. Owing to her interference a new and urgent

anxiety had entered into our relations, which pressed for serious

settlement. It was natural that we should begin to think of what it was

all going to lead to. I must confess that the idea of marriage,

especially in view of my youth, filled me with dismay, and without

indeed reflecting on the matter, or seriously weighing its pros and

cons, a naive and instinctive feeling prevented me even from

considering the possibility of a step which would have such serious

consequences upon my whole life. Moreover, our modest circumstances

were in so alarming and uncertain a state that even Minna declared that

she was more anxious to see these improved than to get me to marry her.

But she was also driven to think of herself, and that promptly, for

trouble arose with regard to her own position in the Magdeburg theatre.

There she had met with a rival in her own speciality, and as this

woman’s husband became chief stage manager, and consequently had

supreme power, she grew to be a source of great danger. Seeing,

therefore, that at this very moment Minna received advantageous offers

from the managers of the Konigstadt theatre in Berlin, then doing a

splendid business, she seized the opportunity to break off her

connection with the Magdeburg theatre, and thus plunged me, whom she

did not appear to consider in the matter, into the depths of despair. I

could not hinder Minna from going to Berlin to fulfil a special

engagement there, although this was not in accordance with her

agreement, and so she departed, leaving me behind, overcome with grief

and doubt as to the meaning of her conduct. At last, mad with passion,

I wrote to her urging her to return, and the better to move her and not

to separate her fate from my own, I proposed to her in a strictly

formal manner, and hinted at the hope of early marriage. About the same

time my brother-in-law, Wolfram, having quarrelled with the director

Bethmann and cancelled his contract with him, also went to the

Konigstadt theatre to fulfil a special engagement. My good sister

Clara, who had remained behind for a while amid the somewhat unpleasant

conditions of Magdeburg, soon perceived the anxious and troubled temper

in which her otherwise cheerful brother was rapidly consuming himself.

One day she thought it advisable to show me a letter from her husband,

with news from Berlin, and especially concerning Minna, in which he

earnestly deplored my passion for this girl, who was acting quite

unworthily of me. As she lodged at his hotel, he was able to observe

that not only the company she kept, but also her own conduct, were

perfectly scandalous. The extraordinary impression which this dreadful

communication made upon me decided me to abandon the reserve I had

hitherto shown towards my relatives with regard to my love affairs. I

wrote to my brother-in-law in Berlin, telling him how matters stood

with me, and that my plans greatly depended on Minna, and further, how

extremely important it was for me to learn from him the indubitable

truth concerning her of whom he had sent so evil an account. From my

brother-in-law, usually so dry and given to joking, I received a reply

which filled my heart to overflowing again. He confessed that he had

accused Minna too hastily, and regretted that he had allowed idle

chatter to influence him in founding a charge, which, on investigation,

had proved to be altogether groundless and unjust; he declared,

moreover, that on nearer acquaintance and conversation with her he had

been so fully convinced of the genuineness and uprightness of her

character, that he hoped with all his heart that I might see my way to

marry her. And now a storm raged in my heart. I implored Minna to

return at once, and was glad to learn that, for her part, she was not

inclined to renew her engagement at the Berlin theatre, as she had now

acquired a more intimate knowledge of the life there, and found it too

frivolous. All that remained, then, was for me to facilitate the

resumption of her Magdeburg engagement. To this end, therefore, at a

meeting of the theatre committee, I attacked the director and his

detested stage manager with such energy, and defended Minna against the

wrong done her by them both with such passion and fervour, that the

other members, astonished at the frank confession of my affection,

yielded to my wishes without any further ado. And now I set off by

extra post in the depth of night and in dreadful winter weather to meet

my returning sweetheart. I greeted her with tears of deepest joy, and

led her back in triumph to her cosy Magdeburg home, already become so

dear to me.

Meanwhile, as our two lives, thus severed for a while, were being drawn

more and more closely together, I finished the score of my Liebesverbot

about New Year 1836. For the development of my future plans I depended

not a little upon the success of this work; and Minna herself seemed

not disinclined to yield to my hopes in this respect. We had reason to

be concerned as to how matters would pan out for us at the beginning of

the spring, for this season is always a bad one in which to start such

precarious theatrical enterprises. In spite of royal support and the

participation of the theatre committee in the general management of the

theatre, our worthy director’s state of perennial bankruptcy suffered

no alteration, and it seemed as if his theatrical undertaking could not

possibly last much longer in any form. Nevertheless, with the help of

the really first-rate company of singers at my disposal, the production

of my opera was to mark a complete change in my unsatisfactory

circumstances. With the view of recovering the travelling expenses I

had incurred during the previous summer, I was entitled to a benefit

performance. I naturally fixed this for the presentation of my own

work, and did my utmost so that this favour granted me by the directors

should prove as inexpensive to them as possible. As they would

nevertheless be compelled to incur some expense in the production of

the new opera, I agreed that the proceeds of the first presentation

should be left to them, while I should claim only those of the second.

I did not consider it altogether unsatisfactory that the time for the

rehearsals was postponed until the very end of the season, for it was

reasonable to suppose that our company, which was often greeted with

unusual applause, would receive special attention and favour from the

public during its concluding performances. Unfortunately, however,

contrary to our expectations, we never reached the proper close of this

season, which had been fixed for the end of April; for already in

March, owing to irregularity in the payment of salaries, the most

popular members of the company, having found better employment

elsewhere, tendered their resignations to the management, and the

director, who was unable to raise the necessary cash, was compelled to

bow to the inevitable. Now, indeed, my spirits sank, for it seemed more

than doubtful whether my Liebesverbot would ever be produced at all. I

owed it entirely to the warm affection felt for me personally by all

members of the opera company, that the singers consented not only to

remain until the end of March, but also to undertake the toil of

studying and rehearsing my opera, a task which, considering the very

limited time, promised to be extremely arduous. In the event of our

having to give two representations, the time at our disposal was so

very short that, for all the rehearsals, we had but ten days before us.

And since we were concerned not with a light comedy or farce, but with

a grand opera, and one which, in spite of the trifling character of its

music, contained numerous and powerful concerted passages, the

undertaking might have been regarded almost as foolhardy. Nevertheless,

I built my hopes upon the extraordinary exertions which the singers so

willingly made in order to please me; for they studied continuously,

morning, noon, and night. But seeing that, in spite of all this, it was

quite impossible to attain to perfection, especially in the matter of

words, in the case of every one of these harassed performers, I

reckoned further on my own acquired skill as conductor to achieve the

final miracle of success. The peculiar ability I possessed of helping

the singers and of making them, in spite of much uncertainty, seem to

flow smoothly onwards, was clearly demonstrated in our orchestral

rehearsals, in which, by dint of constant prompting, loud singing with

the performers and vigorous directions as to necessary action, I got

the whole thing to run so easily that it seemed quite possible that the

performance might be a reasonable success after all. Unfortunately, we

did not consider that in front of the public all these drastic methods

of moving the dramatic and musical machinery would be restricted to the

movements of my baton and to my facial expression. As a matter of fact

the singers, and especially the men, were so extraordinarily uncertain

that from beginning to end their embarrassment crippled the

effectiveness of every one of their parts. Freimuller, the tenor, whose

memory was most defective, sought to patch up the lively and emotional

character of his badly learned rule of the madcap Luzio by means of

routine work learned in Fra Diavolo and Zampa, and especially by the

aid of an enormously thick, brightly coloured and fluttering plume of

feathers. Consequently, as the directors failed to have the book of

words printed in time, it was impossible to blame the public for being

in doubt as to the main outlines of the story, seeing that they had

only the sung words to guide them. With the exception of a few portions

played by the lady singers, which were favourably received, the whole

performance, which I had made to depend largely upon bold, energetic

action and speech, remained but a musical shadow-play, to which the

orchestra contributed its own inexplicable effusions, sometimes with

exaggerated noise. As characteristic of the treatment of my

tone-colour, I may mention that the band-master of a Prussian military

band, who, by the bye, had been well pleased with the performance, felt

it incumbent upon him to give me some well-meant hints for my future

guidance, as to the manipulation of the Turkish drum. Before I relate

the further history of this wonderful work of my youth, I will pause a

moment briefly to describe its character, and especially its poetical

elements.

Shakespeare’s play, which I kept throughout in mind as the foundation

of my story, was worked out in the following manner:—

An unnamed king of Sicily leaves his country, as I suggest, for a

journey to Naples, and hands over to the Regent appointed—whom I simply

call Friedrich, with the view of making him appear as German as

possible—full authority to exercise all the royal power in order to

effect a complete reform in the social habits of his capital, which had

provoked the indignation of the Council. At the opening of the play we

see the servants of the public authority busily employed either in

shutting up or in pulling down the houses of popular amusement in a

suburb of Palermo, and in carrying off the inmates, including hosts and

servants, as prisoners. The populace oppose this first step, and much

scuffling ensues. In the thickest of the throng the chief of the

sbirri, Brighella (basso-buffo), after a preliminary roll of drums for

silence, reads out the Regent’s proclamation, according to which the

acts just performed are declared to be directed towards establishing a

higher moral tone in the manners and customs of the people. A general

outburst of scorn and a mocking chorus meets this announcement. Luzio,

a young nobleman and juvenile scape-grace (tenor), seems inclined to

thrust himself forward as leader of the mob, and at once finds an

occasion for playing a more active part in the cause of the oppressed

people on discovering his friend Claudio (also a tenor) being led away

to prison. From him he learns that, in pursuance of some musty old law

unearthed by Friedrich, he is to suffer the penalty of death for a

certain love escapade in which he is involved. His sweetheart, union

with whom had been prevented by the enmity of their parents, has borne

him a child. Friedrich’s puritanical zeal joins cause with the parents’

hatred; he fears the worst, and sees no way of escape save through

mercy, provided his sister Isabella may be able, by her entreaties, to

melt the Regent’s hard heart. Claudio implores his friend at once to

seek out Isabella in the convent of the Sisters of St. Elizabeth, which

she has recently entered as novice. There, between the quiet walls of

the convent, we first meet this sister, in confidential intercourse

with her friend Marianne, also a novice. Marianne reveals to her

friend, from whom she has long been parted, the unhappy fate which has

brought her to the place. Under vows of eternal fidelity she had been

persuaded to a secret liaison with a man of high rank. But finally,

when in extreme need she found herself not only forsaken, but

threatened by her betrayer, she discovered him to be the mightiest man

in the state, none other than the King’s Regent himself. Isabella’s

indignation finds vent in impassioned words, and is only pacified by

her determination to forsake a world in which so vile a crime can go

unpunished.—When now Luzio brings her tidings of her own brother’s

fate, her disgust at her brother’s misconduct is turned at once to

scorn for the villainy of the hypocritical Regent, who presumes so

cruelly to punish the comparatively venial offence of her brother,

which, at least, was not stained by treachery. Her violent outburst

imprudently reveals her to Luzio in a seductive aspect; smitten with

sudden love, he urges her to quit the convent for ever and to accept

his hand. She contrives to check his boldness, but resolves at once to

avail herself of his escort to the Regent’s court of justice.—Here the

trial scene is prepared, and I introduce it by a burlesque hearing of

several persons charged by the sbirro captain with offences against

morality. The earnestness of the situation becomes more marked when the

gloomy form of Friedrich strides through the inrushing and unruly

crowd, commanding silence, and he himself undertakes the hearing of

Claudio’s case in the sternest manner possible. The implacable judge is

already on the point of pronouncing sentence when Isabella enters, and

requests, before them all, a private interview with the Regent. In this

interview she behaves with noble moderation towards the dreaded, yet

despised man before her, and appeals at first only to his mildness and

mercy. His interruptions merely serve to stimulate her ardour: she

speaks of her brother’s offence in melting accents, and implores

forgiveness for so human and by no means unpardonable a crime. Seeing

the effect of her moving appeal, she continues with increasing ardour

to plead with the judge’s hard and unresponsive heart, which can

certainly not have remained untouched by sentiments such as those which

had actuated her brother, and she calls upon his memory of these to

support her desperate plea for pity. At last the ice of his heart is

broken. Friedrich, deeply stirred by Isabella’s beauty, can no longer

contain himself, and promises to grant her petition at the price of her

own love. Scarcely has she become aware of the unexpected effect of her

words when, filled with indignation at such incredible villainy, she

cries to the people through doors and windows to come in, that she may

unmask the hypocrite before the world. The crowd is already rushing

tumultuously into the hall of judgment, when, by a few significant

hints, Friedrich, with frantic energy, succeeds in making Isabella

realise the impossibility of her plan. He would simply deny her charge,

boldly pretend that his offer was merely made to test her, and would

doubtless be readily believed so soon as it became only a question of

rebutting a charge of lightly making love to her. Isabella, ashamed and

confounded, recognises the madness of her first step, and gnashes her

teeth in silent despair. While then Friedrich once more announces his

stern resolve to the people, and pronounces sentence on the prisoner,

it suddenly occurs to Isabella, spurred by the painful recollection of

Marianne’s fate, that what she has failed to procure by open means she

might possibly obtain by craft. This thought suffices to dispel her

sorrow, and to fill her with utmost gaiety. Turning to her sorrowing

brother, her agitated friends, and the perplexed crowd, she assures

them all that she is ready to provide them with the most amusing of

adventures. She declares that the carnival festivities, which the

Regent has just strictly forbidden, are to be celebrated this year with

unusual licence; for this dreaded ruler only pretends to be so cruel,

in order the more pleasantly to astonish them by himself taking a merry

part in all that he has just forbidden. They all believe that she has

gone mad, and Friedrich in particular reproves her incomprehensible

folly with passionate severity. But a few words on her part suffice to

transport the Regent himself with ecstasy; for in a whisper she

promises to grant his desire, and that on the following night she will

send him such a message as shall ensure his happiness.—And so ends the

first act in a whirl of excitement.

We learn the nature of the heroine’s hastily formed plan at the

beginning of the second act, in which she visits her brother in his

cell, with the object of discovering whether he is worthy of rescue.

She reveals Friedrich’s shameful proposal to him, and asks if he would

wish to save his life at the price of his sister’s dishonour. Then

follow Claudio’s fury and fervent declaration of his readiness to die;

whereupon, bidding farewell to his sister, at least for this life, he

makes her the bearer of the most tender messages to the dear girl whom

he leaves behind. After this, sinking into a softer mood, the unhappy

man declines from a state of melancholy to one of weakness. Isabella,

who had already determined to inform him of his rescue, hesitates in

dismay when she sees him fall in this way from the heights of noble

enthusiasm to a muttered confession of a love of life still as strong

as ever, and even to a stammering query as to whether the suggested

price of his salvation is altogether impossible. Disgusted, she springs

to her feet, thrusts the unworthy man from her, and declares that to

the shame of his death he has further added her most hearty contempt.

After having handed him over again to his gaoler, her mood once more

changes swiftly to one of wanton gaiety. True, she resolves to punish

the waverer by leaving him for a time in uncertainty as to his fate;

but stands firm by her resolve to rid the world of the abominable

seducer who dared to dictate laws to his fellow-men. She tells Marianne

that she must take her place at the nocturnal rendezvous, at which

Friedrich so treacherously expected to meet her (Isabella), and sends

Friedrich an invitation to this meeting. In order to entangle the

latter even more deeply in ruin, she stipulates that he must come

disguised and masked, and fixes the rendezvous in one of those pleasure

resorts which he has just suppressed. To the madcap Luzio, whom she

also desires to punish for his saucy suggestion to a novice, she

relates the story of Friedrich’s proposal, and her pretended intention

of complying, from sheer necessity, with his desires. This she does in

a fashion so incomprehensively light-hearted that the otherwise

frivolous man, first dumb with amazement, ultimately yields to a fit of

desperate rage. He swears that, even if the noble maiden herself can

endure such shame, he will himself strive by every means in his power

to avert it, and would prefer to set all Palermo on fire and in tumult

rather than allow such a thing to happen. And, indeed, he arranges

things in such a manner that on the appointed evening all his friends

and acquaintances assemble at the end of the Corso, as though for the

opening of the prohibited carnival procession. At nightfall, as things

are beginning to grow wild and merry, Luzio appears, and sings an

extravagant carnival song, with the refrain:

Who joins us not in frolic jest

Shall have a dagger in his breast;

by which means he seeks to stir the crowd to bloody revolt. When a band

of sbirri approaches, under Brighella’s leadership, to scatter the gay

throng, the mutinous project seems on the point of being accomplished.

But for the present Luzio prefers to yield, and to scatter about the

neighbourhood, as he must first of all win the real leader of their

enterprise: for here was the spot which Isabella had mischievously

revealed to him as the place of her pretended meeting with the Regent.

For the latter Luzio therefore lies in wait. Recognising him in an

elaborate disguise, he blocks his way, and as Friedrich violently

breaks loose, is on the point of following him with shouts and drawn

sword, when, on a sign from Isabella, who is hidden among some bushes,

he is himself stopped and led away. Isabella then advances, rejoicing

in the thought of having restored the betrayed Marianne to her

faithless spouse. Believing that she holds in her hand the promised

pardon for her brother, she is just on the point of abandoning all

thought of further vengeance when, breaking the seal, to her intense

horror she recognises by the light of a torch that the paper contains

but a still more severe order of execution, which, owing to her desire

not to disclose to her brother the fact of his pardon, a mere chance

had now delivered into her hand, through the agency of the bribed

gaoler. After a hard fight with the tempestuous passion of love, and

recognising his helplessness against this enemy of his peace, Friedrich

has in fact already resolved to face his ruin, even though as a

criminal, yet still as a man of honour. An hour on Isabella’s breast,

and then—his own death by the same law whose implacable severity shall

also claim Claudio’s life. Isabella, perceiving in this conduct only a

further proof of the hypocrite’s villainy, breaks out once more into a

tempest of agonised despair. Upon her cry for immediate revolt against

the scoundrelly tyrant, the people collect together and form a motley

and passionate crowd. Luzio, who also returns, counsels the people with

stinging bitterness to pay no heed to the woman’s fury; he points out

that she is only tricking them, as she has already tricked him—for he

still believes in her shameless infidelity. Fresh confusion; increased

despair of Isabella; suddenly from the background comes the burlesque

cry of Brighella for help, who, himself suffering from the pangs of

jealousy, has by mistake arrested the masked Regent, and thus led to

the latter’s discovery. Friedrich is recognised, and Marianne,

trembling on his breast, is also unmasked. Amazement, indignation!

Cries of joy burst forth all round; the needful explanations are

quickly given, and Friedrich sullenly demands to be set before the

judgment-seat of the returning King. Claudio, released from prison by

the jubilant populace, informs him that the sentence of death for

crimes of love is not intended for all times; messengers arrive to

announce the unexpected arrival in harbour of the King; it is resolved

to march in full masked procession to meet the beloved Prince, and

joyously to pay him homage, all being convinced that he will heartily

rejoice to see how ill the gloomy puritanism of Germany is suited to

his hot-blooded Sicily. Of him it is said:

Your merry festals please him more

Than gloomy laws or legal lore.

Friedrich, with his freshly affianced wife, Marianne, must lead the

procession, followed by Luzio and the novice, who is for ever lost to

the convent.

These spirited and, in many respects, boldly devised scenes I had

clothed in suitable language and carefully written verse, which had

already been noticed by Laube. The police at first took exception to

the title of the work, which, had I not changed it, would have led to

the complete failure of my plans for its presentation. It was the week

before Easter, and the theatre was consequently forbidden to produce

jolly, or at least frivolous, plays during this period. Luckily the

magistrate, with whom I had to treat concerning the matter, did not

show any inclination to examine the libretto himself; and when I

assured him that it was modelled upon a very serious play of

Shakespeare’s, the authorities contented themselves merely with

changing the somewhat startling title. Die Novize van Palermo, which

was the new title, had nothing suspicious about it, and was therefore

approved as correct without further scruple. I fared quite otherwise in

Leipzig, where I attempted to introduce this work in the place of my

Feen, when the latter was withdrawn. The director, Ringelhardt, whom I

sought to win over to my cause by assigning the part of Marianne to his

daughter, then making her debut in opera, chose to reject my work on

the apparently very reasonable grounds that the tendency of the theme

displeased him. He assured me that, even if the Leipzig magistrates had

consented to its production—a fact concerning which his high esteem for

that body led him to have serious doubts—he himself, as a conscientious

father, could certainly not permit his daughter to take part in it.

Strange to say, I suffered nothing from the suspicious nature of the

libretto of my opera on the occasion of its production in Magdeburg;

for, as I have said, thanks to the unintelligible manner in which it

was produced, the story remained a complete mystery to the public. This

circumstance, and the fact that no opposition had been raised on the

ground of its TENDENCY, made a second performance possible, and as

nobody seemed to care one way or the other, no objections were raised.

Feeling sure that my opera had made no impression, and had left the

public completely undecided about its merits, I reckoned that, in view

of this being the farewell performance of our opera company, we should

have good, not to say large, takings. Consequently I did not hesitate

to charge ‘full’ prices for admittance. I cannot rightly judge whether,

up to the commencement of the overture, any people had taken their

places in the auditorium; but about a quarter of an hour before the

time fixed for beginning, I saw only Mme. Gottschalk and her husband,

and, curiously enough, a Polish Jew in full dress, seated in the

stalls. Despite this, I was still hoping for an increase in the

audience, when suddenly the most incredible commotion occurred behind

the scenes. Herr Pollert, the husband of my prima donna (who was acting

Isabella), was assaulting Schreiber, the second tenor, a very young and

handsome man taking the part of Claudio, and against whom the injured

husband had for some time been nursing a secret rancour born of

jealousy. It appeared that the singer’s husband, who had surveyed the

theatre from behind the drop-scene with me, had satisfied himself as to

the style of the audience, and decided that the longed-for hour was at

hand when, without injuring the operatic enterprise, he could wreak

vengeance on his wife’s lover. Claudio was so severely used by him that

the unfortunate fellow had to seek refuge in the dressing-room, his

face covered with blood. Isabella was told of this, and rushed

despairingly to her raging spouse, only to be so soundly cuffed by him

that she went into convulsions. The confusion that ensued amongst the

company soon knew no bounds: they took sides in the quarrel, and little

was wanting for it to turn into a general fight, as everybody seemed to

regard this unhappy evening as particularly favourable for the paying

off of any old scores and supposed insults. This much was clear, that

the couple suffering from the effects of Herr Pollert’s conjugal

resentment were unfit to appear that evening. The manager was sent

before the drop-scene to inform the small and strangely assorted

audience gathered in the theatre that, owing to unforeseen

circumstances, the representation would not take place.

This was the end of my career as director and composer in Magdeburg,

which in the beginning had seemed so full of promise and had been

started at the cost of considerable sacrifice. The serenity of art now

gave way completely before the stern realities of life. My position

gave food for meditation, and the outlook was not a cheerful one. All

the hopes that I and Minna had founded upon the success of my work had

been utterly destroyed. My creditors, who had been appeased by the

anticipation of the expected harvest, lost faith in my talents, and now

counted solely on obtaining bodily possession of me, which they

endeavoured to do by speedily instituting legal proceedings. Now that

every time I came home I found a summons nailed to my door, my little

dwelling in the Breiter Weg became unbearable; I avoided going there,

especially since my brown poodle, who had hitherto enlivened this

retreat, had vanished, leaving no trace. This I looked upon as a bad

sign, indicating my complete downfall.

At this time Minna, with her truly comforting assurance and firmness of

bearing, was a tower of strength to me and the one thing I had left to

fall back upon. Always full of resource, she had first of all provided

for her own future, and was on the point of signing a not unfavourable

contract with the directors of the theatre at Königsberg in Prussia. It

was now a question of finding me an appointment in the same place as

musical conductor; this post was already filled. The Königsberg

director, however, gathering from our correspondence that Minna’s

acceptance of the engagement depended upon the possibility of my being

taken on at the same theatre, held out the prospect of an approaching

vacancy, and expressed his willingness to allow it to be filled by me.

On the strength of this assurance it was decided that Minna should go

on to Königsberg and pave the way for my arrival there.

Ere these plans could be carried out, we had still to spend a time of

dreadful and acute anxiety, which I shall never forget, within the

walls of Magdeburg. It is true I made one more personal attempt in

Leipzig to improve my position, on which occasion I entered into the

transactions mentioned above with the director of the theatre regarding

my new opera. But I soon realised that it was out of the question for

me to remain in my native town, and in the disquieting proximity of my

family, from which I was restlessly anxious to get away. My

excitability and depression were noticed by my relations. My mother

entreated me, whatever else I might decide to do, on no account to be

drawn into marriage while still so young. To this I made no reply. When

I took my leave, Rosalie accompanied me to the head of the stairs. I

spoke of returning as soon as I had attended to certain important

business matters, and wanted to wish her a hurried good-bye: she

grasped my hand, and gazing into my face, exclaimed, “God alone knows

when I shall see you again!” This cut me to the heart, and I felt

conscience-stricken. The fact that she was expressing the presentiment

she felt of her early death I only realised when, barely two years

later, without having seen her again, I received the news that she had

died very suddenly.

I spent a few more weeks with Minna in the strictest retirement in

Magdeburg: she endeavoured to the best of her ability to relieve the

embarrassment of my position. In view of our approaching separation,

and the length of time we might be parted, I hardly left her side, our

only relaxation being the walks we took together round the outskirts of

the town. Anxious forebodings weighed upon us; the May sun which lit

the sad streets of Magdeburg, as if in mockery of our forlorn

condition, was one day more clouded over than I have ever seen it

since, and filled me with a positive dread. On our way home from one of

these walks, as we were approaching the bridge crossing the Elbe, we

caught sight of a man flinging himself from it into the water beneath.

We ran to the bank, called for help, and persuaded a miller, whose mill

was situated on the river, to hold out a rake to the drowning man, who

was being swept in his direction by the current. With indescribable

anxiety we waited for the decisive moment—saw the sinking man stretch

out his hands towards the rake, but he failed to grasp it, and at the

same moment disappeared under the mill, never to be seen again. On the

morning that I accompanied Minna to the stage-coach to bid her a most

sorrowful farewell, the whole population was pouring from one of the

gateways of the town towards a big field, to witness the execution of a

man condemned to be put to death on the wheel ‘from below.’[7] The

culprit was a soldier who had murdered his sweetheart in a fit of

jealousy. When, later in the day, I sat down to my last dinner at the

inn, I heard the dreadful details of the Prussian mode of execution

being discussed on all sides. A young magistrate, who was a great lover

of music, told us about a conversation he had had with the executioner,

who had been procured from Halle, and with whom he had discussed the

most humane method of hastening the death of the victim; in telling us

about him, he recalled the elegant dress and manners of this ill-omened

person with a shudder.

[7] _Durch das Rod van unten_. The punishment of the wheel was usually

inflicted upon murderers, incendiaries, highwaymen and church robbers.

There were two methods of inflicting this: (1) ‘from above downwards’

(_von oben nach unten_), in which the condemned man was despatched

instantly owing to his neck getting broken from the start; and (2)

‘from below upwards’ (_von unten nach oben_), which is the method

referred to above, and in which all the limbs of the victim were

broken previous to his body being actually twisted through the spokes

of the wheel.—Editor

These were the last impressions I carried away from the scene of my

first artistic efforts and of my attempts at earning an independent

livelihood. Often since then on my departure from places where I had

expected to find prosperity, and to which I knew I should never return,

those impressions have recurred to my mind with singular persistence. I

have always had much the same feelings upon leaving any place where I

had stayed in the hope of improving my position.

Thus I arrived in Berlin for the first time on the 18th May, 1836, and

made acquaintance with the peculiar features of that pretentious royal

capital. While my position was an uncertain one, I sought a modest

shelter at the Crown Prince in the Königstrasse, where Minna had stayed

a few months before. I found a friend on whom I could rely when I came

across Laube again, who, while awaiting his verdict, was busying

himself with private and literary work in Berlin. He was much

interested in the fate of my work Liebesverbot, and advised me to turn

my present situation to account for the purpose of obtaining the

production of this opera at the Konigstadt theatre. This theatre was

under the direction of one of the most curious creatures in Berlin: he

was called ‘Cerf,’ and the title of Commissionsrath had been conferred

upon him by the King of Prussia. To account for the favours bestowed

upon him by royalty, many reasons of a not very edifying nature were

circulated. Through this royal patronage he had succeeded in extending

considerably the privileges already enjoyed by the suburban theatre.

The decline of grand opera at the Theatre Royal had brought light

opera, which was performed with great success at the Konigstadt

theatre, into public favour. The director, puffed up by success, openly

laboured under the delusion that he was the right man in the right

place, and expressed his entire agreement with those who declared that

one could only expect a theatre to be successfully managed by common

and uneducated men, and continued to cling to his blissful and

boundless state of ignorance in the most amusing manner. Relying

absolutely upon his own insight, he had assumed an entirely dictatorial

attitude towards the officially appointed artists of his theatre, and

allowed himself to deal with them according to his likes and dislikes.

I seemed destined to be favoured by this mode of procedure: at my very

first visit Cerf expressed his satisfaction with me, but wished to make

use of me as a ‘tenor.’ He offered no objection whatever to my request

for the production of my opera, but, on the contrary, promised to have

it staged immediately. He seemed particularly anxious to appoint me

conductor of the orchestra. As he was on the point of changing his

operatic company, he foresaw that his present conductor, Glaser, the

composer of Adlershorst, would hinder his plans by taking the part of

the older singers: he was therefore anxious to have me associated with

his theatre, that he might have some one to support him who was

favourably disposed towards the new singers.

All this sounded so plausible, that I could scarcely be blamed for

believing that the wheel of fortune had taken a favourable turn for me,

and for feeling a sense of lightheartedness at the thought of such rosy

prospects. I had scarcely allowed myself the few modifications in my

manner of living which these improved circumstances seemed to justify,

ere it was made clear to me that my hopes were built upon sand. I was

filled with positive dread when I soon fully realised how nearly Cerf

had come to defrauding me, merely it would seem for his own amusement.

After the manner of despots, he had given his favours personally and

autocratically; the withdrawal and annulment of his promises, however,

he made known to me through his servants and secretaries, thus placing

his strange conduct towards me in the light of the inevitable result of

his dependence upon officialdom.

As Cerf wished to rid himself of me without even offering me

compensation, I was obliged to try to come to some understanding

regarding all that had been definitely arranged between us, and this

with the very people against whom he had previously warned me and had

wanted me to side with him. The conductor, stage manager, secretary,

etc., had to make it clear to me that my wishes could not be satisfied,

and that the director owed me no compensation whatever for the time he

had made me waste while awaiting the fulfilment of his promises. This

unpleasant experience has been a source of pain to me ever since.

Owing to all this my position was very much worse than it had been

before. Minna wrote to me frequently from Königsberg, but she had

nothing encouraging to tell me with regard to my hopes in that

direction. The director of the theatre there seemed unable to come to

any clear understanding with his conductor, a circumstance which I was

afterwards able to understand, but which at the time appeared to me

inexplicable, and made my chance of obtaining the coveted appointment

seem exceedingly remote. It seemed certain, however, that the post

would be vacant in the autumn, and as I was drifting about aimlessly in

Berlin and refused for a moment to entertain the thought of returning

to Leipzig, I snatched at this faint hope, and in imagination soared

above the Berlin quicksands to the safety of the harbour on the Baltic.

I only succeeded in doing so, however, after I had struggled through

difficult and serious inward conflicts to which my relations with Minna

gave rise. An incomprehensible feature in the character of this

otherwise apparently simple-minded woman had thrown my young heart into

a turmoil. A good-natured, well-to-do tradesman of Jewish extraction,

named Schwabe, who till that time had been established in Magdeburg,

made friendly advances to me in Berlin, and I soon discovered that his

sympathy was chiefly due to the passionate interest which he had

conceived for Minna. It afterwards became clear to me that an intimacy

had existed between this man and Minna, which in itself could hardly be

considered as a breach of faith towards me, since it had ended in a

decided repulse of my rival’s courtship in my favour. But the fact of

this episode having been kept so secret that I had not had the faintest

idea of it before, and also the suspicion I could not avoid harbouring

that Minna’s comfortable circumstances were in part due to this man’s

friendship, filled me with gloomy misgivings. But as I have said,

although I could find no real cause to complain of infidelity, I was

distracted and alarmed, and was at last driven to the half-desperate

resolve of regaining my balance in this respect by obtaining complete

possession of Minna. It seemed to me as though my stability as a

citizen as well as my professional success would be assured by a

recognised union with Minna. The two years spent in the theatrical

world had, in fact, kept me in a constant state of distraction, of

which in my heart of hearts I was most painfully conscious. I realised

vaguely that I was on the wrong path; I longed for peace and quiet, and

hoped to find these most effectually by getting married, and so putting

an end to the state of things that had become the source of so much

anxiety to me.

It was not surprising that Laube noticed by my untidy, passionate, and

wasted appearance that something unusual was amiss with me. It was only

in his company, which I always found comforting, that I gained the only

impressions of Berlin which compensated me in any way for my

misfortunes. The most important artistic experience I had, came to me

through the performance of Ferdinand Cortez, conducted by Spontini

himself, the spirit of which astonished me more than anything I had

ever heard before. Though the actual production, especially as regards

the chief characters, who as a whole could not be regarded as belonging

to the flower of Berlin opera, left me unmoved, and though the effect

never reached a point that could be even distantly compared to that

produced upon me by Schroder-Devrient, yet the exceptional precision,

fire, and richly organised rendering of the whole was new to me. I

gained a fresh insight into the peculiar dignity of big theatrical

representations, which in their several parts could, by

well-accentuated rhythm, be made to attain the highest pinnacle of art.

This extraordinarily distinct impression took a drastic hold of me, and

above all served to guide me in my conception of Rienzi, so that,

speaking from an artistic point of view, Berlin may be said to have

left its traces on my development.

For the present, however, my chief concern was to extricate myself from

my extremely helpless position. I was determined to turn my steps to

Königsberg, and communicated my decision, and the hopes founded upon

it, to Laube. This excellent friend, without further inquiry, made a

point of exerting his energies to free me from my present state of

despair, and to help me to reach my next destination, an object which,

through the assistance of several of his friends, he succeeded in

accomplishing. When he said good-bye to me, Laube with sympathetic

foresight warned me, should I succeed in my desired career of musical

conductor, not to allow myself to be entangled in the shallowness of

stage life, and advised me, after fatiguing rehearsals, instead of

going to my sweetheart, to take a serious book in hand, in order that

my greater gifts might not go uncultivated. I did not tell him that by

taking an early and decisive step in this direction I intended to

protect myself effectually against the dangers of theatrical intrigues.

On the 7th of July, therefore, I started on what was at that time an

extremely troublesome and fatiguing journey to the distant town of

Königsberg.

It seemed to me as though I were leaving the world, as I travelled on

day after day through the desert marches. Then followed a sad and

humiliating impression of Königsberg, where, in one of the

poorest-looking suburbs, Tragheim, near the theatre, and in a lane such

as one would expect to find in a village, I found the ugly house in

which Minna lodged. The friendly and quiet kindness of manner, however,

which was peculiar to her, soon made me feel at home. She was popular

at the theatre, and was respected by the managers and actors, a fact

which seemed to augur well for her betrothed, the part I was now openly

to assume.

Though as yet there seemed no distinct prospect of my getting the

appointment I had come for, yet we agreed that I could hold out a

little longer, and that the matter would certainly be arranged in the

end. This was also the opinion of the eccentric Abraham Möller, a

worthy citizen of Königsberg, who was devoted to the theatre, and who

took a very friendly interest in Minna, and finally also in me. This

man, who was already well advanced in life, belonged to the type of

theatre lovers now probably completely extinct in Germany, but of whom

so much is recorded in the history of actors of earlier times. One

could not spend an hour in the company of this man, who at one time had

gone in for the most reckless speculations, without having to listen to

his account of the glory of the stage in former times, described in

most lively terms. As a man of means he had at one time made the

acquaintance of nearly all the great actors and actresses of his day,

and had even known how to win their friendship. Through too great a

liberality he unfortunately found himself in reduced circumstances, and

was now obliged to procure the means to satisfy his craving for the

theatre and his desire to protect those belonging to it by entering

into all kinds of strange business transactions, in which, without

running any real risk, he felt there was something to be gained. He was

accordingly only able to afford the theatre a very meagre support, but

one which was quite in keeping with its decrepit condition.

This strange man, of whom the theatre director, Anton Hubsch, stood to

a certain extent in awe, undertook to procure me my appointment. The

only circumstance against me was the fact that Louis Schubert, the

famous musician whom I had known from very early times as the first

violoncellist of the Magdeburg orchestra, had come to Königsberg from

Riga, where the theatre had been closed for a time, and where he had

left his wife, in order to fill the post of musical conductor here

until the new theatre in Riga was opened, and he could return. The

reopening of the Riga theatre, which had already been fixed for the

Easter of this year, had been postponed, and he was now anxious not to

leave Königsberg. Since Schubert was a thorough master in his art, and

since his choosing to remain or go depended entirely on circumstances

over which he had no control, the theatre director found himself in the

embarrassing position of having to secure some one who would be willing

to wait to enter upon his appointment till Schubert’s business called

him away. Consequently a young musical conductor who was anxious to

remain in Königsberg at any price could but be heartily welcomed as a

reserve and substitute in case of emergency. Indeed, the director

declared himself willing to give me a small retaining fee till the time

should arrive for my definite entrance upon my duties.

Schubert, on the contrary, was furious at my arrival; there was no

longer any necessity for his speedy return to Riga, since the reopening

of the theatre there had been postponed indefinitely. Moreover, he had

a special interest in remaining in Königsberg, as he had conceived a

passion for the prima donna there, which considerably lessened his

desire to return to his wife. So at the last moment he clung to his

Königsberg post with great eagerness, regarded me as his deadly enemy,

and, spurred on by his instinct of self-preservation, used every means

in his power to make my stay in Königsberg, and the already painful

position I occupied while awaiting his departure, a veritable hell to

me.

While in Magdeburg I had been on the friendliest footing with both

musicians and singers, and had been shown the greatest consideration by

the public, I here found I had to defend myself on all sides against

the most mortifying ill-will. This hostility towards me, which soon

made itself apparent, contributed in no small degree to make me feel as

though in coming to Königsberg I had gone into exile. In spite of my

eagerness, I realised that under the circumstances my marriage with

Minna would prove a hazardous undertaking. At the beginning of August

the company went to Memel for a time, to open the summer season there,

and I followed Minna a few days later. We went most of the way by sea,

and crossed the Kurische Haff in a sailing vessel in bad weather with

the wind against us—one of the most melancholy crossings I have ever

experienced. As we passed the thin strip of sand that divides this bay

from the Baltic Sea, the castle of Runsitten, where Hoffmann laid the

scene of one of his most gruesome tales (Das Majorat), was pointed out

to me. The fact that in this desolate neighbourhood, of all places in

the world, I should after so long a lapse of time be once more brought

in contact with the fantastic impressions of my youth, had a singular

and depressing effect on my mind. The unhappy sojourn in Memel, the

lamentable role I played there, everything in short, contributed to

make me find my only consolation in Minna, who, after all, was the

cause of my having placed myself in this unpleasant position. Our

friend Abraham followed us from Königsberg and did all kinds of queer

things to promote my interests, and was obviously anxious to put the

director and conductor at variance with each other. One day Schubert,

in consequence of a dispute with Hubsch on the previous night, actually

declared himself too unwell to attend a rehearsal of Euryanthe, in

order to force the manager to summon me suddenly to take his place. In

doing this my rival maliciously hoped that as I was totally unprepared

to conduct this difficult opera, which was seldom played, I would

expose my incapacity in a manner most welcome to his hostile

intentions. Although I had never really had a score of Euryanthe before

me, his wish was so little gratified, that he elected to get well for

the representation in order to conduct it himself, which he would not

have done if it had been found necessary to cancel the performance on

account of my incompetence. In this wretched position, vexed in mind,

exposed to the severe climate, which even on summer evenings struck me

as horribly cold, and occupied merely in warding off the most painful

troubles of life, my time, as far as any professional advancement was

concerned, was completely lost. At last, on our return to Königsberg,

and particularly under the guardianship of Möller, the question as to

what was to be done was more earnestly considered. Finally, Minna and I

were offered a fairly good engagement in Danzig, through the influence

of my brother-in-law Wolfram and his wife, who had gone there.

Möller seized this opportunity to induce the director Hubsch, who was

anxious not to lose Minna, to sign a contract including us both, and by

which it was understood that under any circumstances I should be

officially appointed as conductor at his theatre from the following

Easter. Moreover, for our wedding, a benefit performance was promised,

for which we chose Die Stumme von Portici, to be conducted by me in

person. For, as Möller remarked, it was absolutely necessary for us to

get married, and to have a due celebration of the event; there was no

getting out of it. Minna made no objection, and all my past endeavours

and resolutions seemed to prove that my one desire was to take anchor

in the haven of matrimony. In spite of this, however, a strange

conflict was going on within me at this time. I had become sufficiently

intimate with Minna’s life and character to realise the wide difference

between our two natures as fully as the important step I was about to

take necessitated; but my powers of judgment were not yet sufficiently

matured.

My future wife was the child of poor parents, natives of Oederan in the

Erzgebirge in Saxony. Her father was no ordinary man; he possessed

enormous vitality, but in his old age showed traces of some feebleness

of mind. In his young days he had been a trumpeter in Saxony, and in

this capacity had taken part in a campaign against the French, and had

also been present at the battle of Wagram. He afterwards became a

mechanic, and took up the trade of manufacturing cards for carding

wool, and as he invented an improvement in the process of their

production, he is said to have made a very good business of it for some

time. A rich manufacturer of Chemnitz once gave him a large order to be

delivered at the end of the year: the children, whose pliable fingers

had already proved serviceable in this respect, had to work hard day

and night, and in return the father promised them an exceptionally

happy Christmas, as he expected to get a large sum of money. When the

longed-for time arrived, however, he received the announcement of his

client’s bankruptcy. The goods that had already been delivered were

lost, and the material that remained on his hands there was no prospect

of selling. The family never succeeded in recovering from the state of

confusion into which this misfortune had thrown them; they went to

Dresden, where the father hoped to find remunerative employment as a

skilled mechanic, especially in the manufacture of pianos, of which he

supplied separate parts. He also brought away with him a large quantity

of the fine wire which had been destined for the manufacture of the

cards, and which he hoped to be able to sell at a profit. The

ten-year-old Minna was commissioned to sell separate lots of it to the

milliners for making flowers. She would set out with a heavy basketful

of wire, and had such a gift for persuading people to buy that she soon

disposed of the whole supply to the best advantage. From this time the

desire was awakened in her to be of active use to her impoverished

family, and to earn her own living as soon as possible, in order not to

be a burden on her parents. As she grew up and developed into a

strikingly beautiful woman, she attracted the attention of men at a

very early age. A certain Herr von Einsiedel fell passionately in love

with her, and took advantage of the inexperienced young girl when she

was off her guard. Her family was thrown into the utmost consternation,

and only her mother and elder sister could be told of the terrible

position in which Minna found herself. Her father, from whose anger the

worst consequences were to be feared, was never informed that his

barely seventeen-year-old daughter had become a mother, and under

conditions that had threatened her life, had given birth to a girl.

Minna, who could obtain no redress from her seducer, now felt doubly

called upon to earn her own livelihood and leave her father’s house.

Through the influence of friends, she had been brought into contact

with an amateur theatrical society: while acting in a performance given

there, she attracted the notice of members of the Royal Court Theatre,

and in particular drew the attention of the director of the Dessau

Court Theatre, who was present, and who immediately offered her an

engagement. She gladly caught at this way of escape from her trying

position, as it opened up the possibility of a brilliant stage career,

and of some day being able to provide amply for her family. She had not

the slightest passion for the stage, and utterly devoid as she was of

any levity or coquetry, she merely saw in a theatrical career the means

of earning a quick, and possibly even a rich, livelihood. Without any

artistic training, the theatre merely meant for her the company of

actors and actresses. Whether she pleased or not seemed of importance

in her eyes only in so far as it affected her realisation of a

comfortable independence. To use all the means at her disposal to

assure this end seemed to her as necessary as it is for a tradesman to

expose his goods to the best advantage.

The friendship of the director, manager, and favourite members of the

theatre she regarded as indispensable, whilst those frequenters of the

theatre who, through their criticism or taste, influenced the public,

and thus also had weight with the management, she recognised as beings

upon whom the attainment of her most fervent desires depended. Never to

make enemies of them appeared so natural and so necessary that, in

order to maintain her popularity, she was prepared to sacrifice even

her self-respect. She had in this way created for herself a certain

peculiar code of behaviour, that on the one hand prompted her to avoid

scandals, but on the other hand found excuses even for making herself

conspicuous as long as she herself knew that she was doing nothing

wrong. Hence arose a mixture of inconsistencies, the questionable sense

of which she was incapable of grasping. It was clearly impossible for

her not to lose all real sense of delicacy; she showed, however, a

sense of the fitness of things, which made her have regard to what was

considered proper, though she could not understand that mere

appearances were a mockery when they only served to cloak the absence

of a real sense of delicacy. As she was without idealism, she had no

artistic feeling; neither did she possess any talent for acting, and

her power of pleasing was due entirely to her charming appearance.

Whether in time routine would have made her become a good actress it is

impossible for me to say. The strange power she exercised over me from

the very first was in no wise due to the fact that I regarded her in

any way as the embodiment of my ideal; on the contrary, she attracted

me by the soberness and seriousness of her character, which

supplemented what I felt to be wanting in my own, and afforded me the

support that in my wanderings after the ideal I knew to be necessary

for me.

I had soon accustomed myself never to betray my craving after the ideal

before Minna: unable to account for this even to myself, I always made

a point of avoiding the subject by passing it over with a laugh and a

joke; but, on this account, it was all the more natural for me to feel

qualms when fears arose in my mind as to her really possessing the

qualities to which I had attributed her superiority over me. Her

strange tolerance with regard to certain familiarities and even

importunities on the part of patrons of the theatre, directed even

against her person, hurt me considerably; and on my reproaching her for

this, I was driven to despair by her assuming an injured expression as

though I had insulted her. It was quite by chance that I came across

Schwabe’s letters, and thus gained an astonishing insight into her

intimacy with that man, of which she had left me in ignorance, and

allowed me to gain my first knowledge during my stay in Berlin. All my

latent jealousy, all my inmost doubts concerning Minna’s character,

found vent in my sudden determination to leave the girl at once. There

was a violent scene between us, which was typical of all our subsequent

altercations. I had obviously gone too far in treating a woman who was

not passionately in love with me, as if I had a real right over her;

for, after all, she had merely yielded to my importunity, and in no way

belonged to me. To add to my perplexity, Minna only needed to remind me

that from a worldly point of view she had refused very good offers in

order to give way to the impetuosity of a penniless young man, whose

talent had not yet been put to any real test, and to whom she had

nevertheless shown sympathy and kindness.

What she could least forgive in me was the raging vehemence with which

I spoke, and by which she felt so insulted, that upon realising to what

excesses I had gone, there was nothing I could do but try and pacify

her by owning myself in the wrong, and begging her forgiveness. Such

was the end of this and all subsequent scenes, outwardly; at least,

always to her advantage. But peace was undermined for ever, and by the

frequent recurrence of such quarrels, Minna’s character underwent a

considerable change. Just as in later times she became perplexed by

what she considered my incomprehensible conception of art and its

proportions, which upset her ideas about everything connected with it,

so now she grew more and more confused by my greater delicacy in regard

to morality, which was very different from hers, especially as in many

other respects I displayed a freedom of opinion which the could neither

comprehend nor approve.

A feeling of passionate resentment was accordingly roused in her

otherwise tranquil disposition. It was not surprising that this

resentment increased as the years went on, and manifested itself in a

manner characteristic of a girl sprung from the lower middle class, in

whom mere superficial polish had taken the place of any true culture.

The real torment of our subsequent life together lay in the fact that,

owing to her violence, I had lost the last support I had hitherto found

in her exceptionally sweet disposition. At that time I was filled only

with a dim foreboding of the fateful step I was taking in marrying her.

Her agreeable and soothing qualities still had such a beneficial effect

upon me, that with the frivolity natural to me, as well as the

obstinacy with which I met all opposition, I silenced the inner voice

that darkly foreboded disaster.

Since my journey to Königsberg I had broken off all communication with

my family, that is to say, with my mother and Rosalie, and I told no

one of the step I had decided to take. Under my old friend Möller’s

audacious guidance I overcame all the legal difficulties that stood in

the way of our union. According to Prussian law, a man who has reached

his majority no longer requires his parents’ consent to his marriage:

but since, according to this same provision, I was not yet of age, I

had recourse to the law of Saxony, to which country I belonged by

birth, and by whose regulations I had already attained my majority at

the age of twenty-one. Our banns had to be published at the place where

we had been living during the past year, and this formality was carried

out in Magdeburg without any further objections being raised. As

Minna’s parents had given their consent, the only thing that still

remained to be done to make everything quite in order was for us to go

together to the clergyman of the parish of Tragheim. This proved a

strange enough visit. It took place the morning preceding the

performance to be given for our benefit, in which Minna had chosen, the

pantomimic role of Fenella; her costume was not ready yet, and there

was still a great deal to be done. The rainy cold November weather made

us feel out of humour, when, to add to our vexation, we were kept

standing in the hall of the vicarage for an unreasonable time. Then an

altercation arose between us which speedily led to such bitter

vituperation that we were just on the point of separating and going

each our own way, when the clergyman opened the door. Not a little

embarrassed at having surprised us in the act of quarrelling, he

invited us in. We were obliged to put a good face on the matter,

however; and the absurdity of the situation so tickled our sense of

humour that we laughed; the parson was appeased, and the wedding fixed

for eleven o’clock the next morning.

Another fruitful source of irritation, which often led to the outbreak

of violent quarrelling between us, was the arrangement of our future

home, in the interior comfort and beauty of which I hoped to find a

guarantee of happiness. The economical ideas of my bride filled me with

impatience. I was determined that the inauguration of a series of

prosperous years which I saw before me must be celebrated by a

correspondingly comfortable home. Furniture, household utensils, and

all necessaries were obtained on credit, to be paid for by instalment.

There was, of course, no question of a dowry, a wedding outfit, or any

of the things that are generally considered indispensable to a

well-founded establishment. Our witnesses and guests were drawn from

the company of actors accidentally brought together by their engagement

at the Königsberg theatre. My friend Möller made us a present of a

silver sugar-basin, which was supplemented by a silver cake-basket from

another stage friend, a peculiar and, as far as I can remember, rather

interesting young man named Ernst Castell. The benefit performance of

the Die Stumme von Portici, which I conducted with great enthusiasm,

went off well, and brought us in as large a sum as we had counted upon.

After spending the rest of the day before our wedding very quietly, as

we were tired out after our return from the theatre, I took up my abode

for the first time in our new home. Not wishing to use the bridal bed,

decorated for the occasion, I lay down on a hard sofa, without even

sufficient covering on me, and froze valiantly while awaiting the

happiness of the following day. I was pleasantly excited the next

morning by the arrival of Minna’s belongings, packed in boxes and

baskets. The weather, too, had quite cleared up, and the sun was

shining brightly; only our sitting-room refused to get properly warm,

which for some time drew down Minna’s reproaches upon my head for my

supposed carelessness in not having seen to the heating arrangements.

At last I dressed myself in my new suit, a dark blue frock-coat with

gold buttons. The carriage drove up, and I set out to fetch my bride.

The bright sky had put us all in good spirits, and in the best of

humour I met Minna, who was dressed in a splendid gown chosen by me.

She greeted me with sincere cordiality and pleasure shining from her

eyes; and taking the fine weather as a good omen, we started off for

what now seemed to us a most cheerful wedding. We enjoyed the

satisfaction of seeing the church as over-crowded as if a brilliant

theatrical representation were being given; it was quite a difficult

matter to make our way to the altar, where a group no less worldly than

the rest, consisting of our witnesses, dressed in all their theatrical

finery, were assembled to receive us. There was not one real friend

amongst all those present, for even our strange old friend Möller was

absent, because no suitable partner had been found for him. I was not

for a single moment insensible to the chilling frivolity of the

congregation, who seemed to impart their tone to the whole ceremony. I

listened like one in a dream to the nuptial address of the parson, who,

I was afterwards told, had had a share in producing the spirit of

bigotry which at this time was so prevalent in Königsberg, and which

exercised such a disquieting influence on its population.

A few days later I was told that a rumour had got about the town that I

had taken action against the parson for some gross insults contained in

his sermon; I did not quite see what was meant, but supposed that the

exaggerated report arose from a passage in his address which I in my

excitement had misunderstood. The preacher, in speaking of the dark

days, of which we were to expect our share, bade us look to an unknown

friend, and I glanced up inquiringly for further particulars of this

mysterious and influential patron who chose so strange a way of

announcing himself. Reproachfully, and with peculiar emphasis, the

pastor then pronounced the name of this unknown friend: Jesus. Now I

was not in any way insulted by this, as people imagined, but was simply

disappointed; at the same time, I thought that such exhortations were

probably usual in nuptial addresses.

But, on the whole, I was so absent-minded during this ceremony, which

was double Dutch to me, that when the parson held out the closed

prayer-book for us to place our wedding rings upon, Minna had to nudge

me forcibly to make me follow her example.

At that moment I saw, as clearly as in a vision, my whole being divided

into two cross-currents that dragged me in different directions; the

upper one faced the sun and carried me onward like a dreamer, whilst

the lower one held my nature captive, a prey to some inexplicable fear.

The extraordinary levity with which I chased away the conviction which

kept forcing itself upon me, that I was committing a twofold sin, was

amply accounted for by the really genuine affection with which I looked

upon the young girl whose truly exceptional character (so rare in the

environment in which she had been placed) led her thus to bind herself

to a young man without any means of support. It was eleven o’clock on

the morning of the 24th of November, 1836, and I was twenty-three and a

half.

On the way home from church, and afterwards, my good spirits rose

superior to all my doubts.

Minna at once took upon herself the duty of receiving and entertaining

her guests. The table was spread, and a rich feast, at which Abraham

Möller, the energetic promoter of our marriage, also took part,

although he had been rather put out by his exclusion from the church

ceremony, made up for the coldness of the room, which for a long time

refused to get warm, to the great distress of the young hostess.

Everything went off in the usual uneventful way. Nevertheless, I

retained my good spirits till the next morning, when I had to present

myself at the magistrate’s court to meet the demands of my creditors,

which had been forwarded to me from Magdeburg to Konigsburg.

My friend Möller, whom I had retained for my defence, had foolishly

advised me to meet my creditors’ demands by pleading infancy according

to the law of Prussia, at all events until actual assistance for the

settlement of the claims could be obtained.

The magistrate, to whom I stated this plea as I had been advised, was

astonished, being probably well aware of my marriage on the previous

day, which could only have taken place on the production of documentary

proof of my majority. I naturally only gained a brief respite by this

manœuvre, and the troubles which beset me for a long time afterwards

had their origin on the first day of my marriage.

During the period when I held no appointment at the theatre I suffered

various humiliations. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to make the most

of my leisure in the interests of my art, and I finished a few pieces,

among which was a grand overture on Rule Britannia.

When I was still in Berlin I had written the overture entitled Polonia,

which has already been mentioned in connection with the Polish

festival. Rule Britannia was a further and deliberate step in the

direction of mass effects; at the close a strong military band was to

be added to the already over-full orchestra, and I intended to have the

whole thing performed at the Musical Festival in Königsberg in the

summer.

To these two overtures I added a supplement—an overture entitled

Napoleon. The point to which I devoted my chief attention was the

selection of the means for producing certain effects, and I carefully

considered whether I should express the annihilating stroke of fate

that befell the French Emperor in Russia by a beat on the tom-tom or

not. I believe it was to a great extent my scruples about the

introduction of this beat that prevented me from carrying out my plan

just then.

On the other hand, the conclusions which I had reached regarding the

ill-success of Liebesverbot resulted in an operatic sketch in which the

demands made on the chorus and the staff of singers should be more in

proportion to the known capacity of the local company, as this small

theatre was the only one at my disposal.

A quaint tale from the Arabian Nights suggested the very subject for a

light work of this description, the title of which, if I remember

rightly, was Mannerlist grosser als Frauenlist (‘Man outwits Woman’).

I transplanted the story from Bagdad to a modern setting. A young

goldsmith offends the pride of a young woman by placing the above motto

on the sign over his shop; deeply veiled, she steps into his shop and

asks him, as he displays such excellent taste in his work, to express

his opinion on her own physical charms; he begins with her feet and her

hands, and finally, noticing his confusion, she removes the veil from

her face. The jeweller is carried away by her beauty, whereupon she

complains to him that her father, who has always kept her in the

strictest seclusion, describes her to all her suitors as an ugly

monster, his object being, she imagines, simply to keep her dowry. The

young man swears that he will not be frightened off by these foolish

objections, should the father raise them against his suit. No sooner

said than done. The daughter of this peculiar old gentleman is promised

to the unsuspecting jeweller, and is brought to her bridegroom as soon

as he has signed the contract. He then sees that the father has indeed

spoken the truth, the real daughter being a perfect scarecrow. The

beautiful lady returns to the bridegroom to gloat over his desperation,

and promises to release him from his terrible marriage if he will

remove the motto from his signboard. At this point I departed from the

original, and continued as follows: The enraged jeweller is on the

point of tearing down his unfortunate signboard when a curious

apparition leads him to pause in the act. He sees a bear-leader in the

street making his clumsy beast dance, in whom the luckless lover

recognises at a glance his own father, from whom he has been parted by

a hard fate.

He suppresses any sign of emotion, for in a flash a scheme occurs to

him by which he can utilise this discovery to free himself from the

hated marriage with the daughter of the proud old aristocrat.

He instructs the bear-leader to come that evening to the garden where

the solemn betrothal is to take place in the presence of the invited

guests.

He then explains to his young enemy that he wishes to leave the

signboard up for the time being, as he still hopes to prove the truth

of the motto.

After the marriage contract, in which the young man arrogates to

himself all kinds of fictitious titles of nobility, has been read to

the assembled company (composed, say, of the elite of the noble

immigrants at the time of the French Revolution), there is heard

suddenly the pipe of the bear-leader, who enters the garden with his

prancing beast. Angered by this trivial diversion, the astonished

company become indignant when the bridegroom, giving free vent to his

feelings, throws himself with tears of joy into the arms of the

bear-leader and loudly proclaims him as his long-lost father. The

consternation of the company becomes even greater, however, when the

bear itself embraces the man they supposed to be of noble birth, for

the beast is no less a person than his own brother in the flesh who, on

the death of the real bear, had donned its skin, thus enabling the

poverty-stricken pair to continue to earn their livelihood in the only

way left to them. This public disclosure of the bridegroom’s lowly

origin at once dissolves the marriage, and the young woman, declaring

herself outwitted by man, offers her hand in compensation to the

released jeweller.

To this unassuming subject I gave the title of the Gluckliche

Barenfamilie, and provided it with a dialogue which afterwards met with

Holtei’s highest approval.

I was about to begin the music for it in a new light French style, but

the seriousness of my position, which grew more and more acute,

prevented further progress in my work.

In this respect my strained relations with the conductor of the theatre

were still a constant source of trouble. With neither the opportunity

nor the means to defend myself, I had to submit to being maligned and

rendered an object of suspicion on all sides by my rival, who remained

master of the field. The object of this was to disgust me with the idea

of taking up my appointment as musical conductor, for which the

contract had been signed for Easter. Though I did not lose my

self-confidence, I suffered keenly from the indignity and the

depressing effect of this prolonged strain.

When at last, at the beginning of April, the moment arrived for the

musical conductor Schubert to resign, and for me to take over the whole

charge, he had the melancholy satisfaction of knowing that not only was

the standing of the opera seriously weakened by the departure of the

prima donna, but that there was good reason to doubt whether the

theatre could be carried on at all. This month of Lent, which was such

a bad time in Germany for all similar theatrical enterprises, decimated

the Königsberg audience with the rest. The director took the greatest

trouble imaginable to fill up the gaps in the staff of the opera by

means of engaging strangers temporarily, and by new acquisitions, and

in this my personality and unflagging activity were of real service; I

devoted all my energy to buoying up by word and deed the tattered ship

of the theatre, in which I now had a hand for the first time.

For a long time I had to try and keep cool under the most violent

treatment by a clique of students, among whom my predecessor had raised

up enemies for me; and by the unerring certainty of my conducting I had

to overcome the initial opposition of the orchestra, which had been set

against me.

After laboriously laying the foundation of personal respect, I was now

forced to realise that the business methods of the director, Hubsch,

had already involved too great a sacrifice to permit the theatre to

make its way against the unfavourableness of the season, and in May he

admitted to me that he had come to the point of being obliged to close

the theatre.

By summoning up all my eloquence, and by making suggestions which

promised a happy issue, I was able to induce him to persevere;

nevertheless, this was only possible by making demands on the loyalty

of his company, who were asked to forego part of their salaries for a

time. This aroused general bitterness on the part of the uninitiated,

and I found myself in the curious position of being forced to place the

director in a favourable light to those who were hard hit by these

measures, while I myself and my position were affected in such a manner

that my situation became daily more unendurable under the accumulation

of intolerable difficulties taking their root in my past.

But though I did not even then lose courage, Minna, who as my wife was

robbed of all that she had a right to expect, found this turn of fate

quite unbearable. The hidden canker of our married life which, even

before our marriage, had caused me the most terrible anxiety and led to

violent scenes, reached its full growth under these sad conditions. The

less I was able to maintain the standard of comfort due to our position

by working and making the most of my talents, the more did Minna, to my

insufferable shame, consider it necessary to take this burden upon

herself by making the most of her personal popularity. The discovery of

similar condescensions—as I used to call them—on Minna’s part, had

repeatedly led to revolting scenes, and only her peculiar conception of

her professional position and the needs it involved had made a

charitable interpretation possible.

I was absolutely unable to bring my young wife to see my point of view,

or to make her realise my own wounded feelings on these occasions,

while the unrestrained violence of my speech and behaviour made an

understanding once and for all impossible. These scenes frequently sent

my wife into convulsions of so alarming a nature that, as will easily

be realised, the satisfaction of reconciling her once more was all that

remained to me. Certain it was that our mutual attitude became more and

more incomprehensible and inexplicable to us both.

These quarrels, which now became more frequent and more distressing,

may have gone far to diminish the strength of any affection which Minna

was able to give me, but I had no idea that she was only waiting for a

favourable opportunity to come to a desperate decision.

To fill the place of tenor in our company, I had summoned Friedrich

Schmitt to Königsberg, a friend of my first year in Magdeburg, to whom

allusion has already been made. He was sincerely devoted to me, and

helped me as much as possible in overcoming the dangers which

threatened the prosperity of the theatre as well as my own position.

The necessity of being on friendly terms with the public made me much

less reserved and cautious in making new acquaintances, especially when

in his company.

A rich merchant, of the name of Dietrich, had recently constituted

himself a patron of the theatre, and especially of the women. With due

deference to the men with whom they were connected, he used to invite

the pick of these ladies to dinner at his house, and affected, on these

occasions, the well-to-do Englishman, which was the beau-ideal for

German merchants, especially in the manufacturing towns of the north.

I had shown my annoyance at the acceptance of the invitation, sent to

us among the rest, at first simply because his looks were repugnant to

me. Minna considered this very unjust. Anyhow, I set my face decidedly

against continuing our acquaintance with this man, and although Minna

did not insist on receiving him, my conduct towards the intruder was

the cause of angry scenes between us.

One day Friedrich Schmitt considered it his duty to inform me that this

Herr Dietrich had spoken of me at a public dinner in such a manner as

to lead every one to suppose that he had a suspicious intimacy with my

wife. I felt obliged to suspect Minna of having, in some way unknown to

me, told the fellow about my conduct towards her, as well as about our

precarious position.

Accompanied by Schmitt, I called this dangerous person to account on

the subject in his own home. At first this only led to the usual

denials. Afterwards, however, he sent secret communications to Minna

concerning the interview, thus providing her with a supposed new

grievance against me in the form of my inconsiderate treatment of her.

Our relations now reached a critical stage, and on certain points we

preserved silence.

At the same time—it was towards the end of May, 1837—the business

affairs of the theatre had reached the crisis above mentioned, when the

management was obliged to fall back on the self-sacrificing

co-operation of the staff to assure the continuance of the undertaking.

As I have said before, my own position at the end of a year so

disastrous to my welfare was seriously affected by this; nevertheless,

there seemed to be no alternative for me but to face these difficulties

patiently, and relying on the faithful Friedrich Schmitt, but ignoring

Minna, I began to take the necessary steps for making my post at

Königsberg secure. This, as well as the arduous part I took in the

business of the theatre, kept me so busy and so much away from home,

that I was not able to pay any particular attention to Minna’s silence

and reserve.

On the morning of the 31st of May I took leave of Minna, expecting to

be detained till late in the afternoon by rehearsals and business

matters. With my entire approval she had for some time been accustomed

to have her daughter Nathalie, who was supposed by every one to be her

youngest sister, to stay with her.

As I was about to wish them my usual quiet good-bye, the two women

rushed after me to the door and embraced me passionately, Minna as well

as her daughter bursting into tears. I was alarmed, and asked the

meaning of this excitement, but could get no answer from them, and I

was obliged to leave them and ponder alone over their peculiar conduct,

of the reason for which I had not even the faintest idea.

I arrived home late in the afternoon, worn out by my exertions and

worries, dead-tired, pale and hungry, and was surprised to find the

table not laid and Minna not at home, the maid telling me that she had

not yet returned from her walk with Nathalie.

I waited patiently, sinking down exhausted at the work-table, which I

absent-mindedly opened. To my intense astonishment it was empty.

Horror-struck, I sprang up and went to the wardrobe, and realised at

once that Minna had left the house; her departure had been so cunningly

planned that even the maid was unaware of it.

With death in my soul I dashed out of the house to investigate the

cause of Minna’s disappearance.

Old Möller, by his practical sagacity, very soon found out that

Dietrich, his personal enemy, had left Königsberg in the direction of

Berlin by the special coach in the morning.

This horrible fact stood staring me in the face.

I had now to try and overtake the fugitives. With the lavish use of

money this might have been possible, but funds were lacking, and had,

in part, to be laboriously collected.

On Möller’s advice I took the silver wedding presents with me in case

of emergency, and after the lapse of a few terrible hours went off,

also by special coach, with my distressed old friend. We hoped to

overtake the ordinary mail-coach, which had started a short time

before, as it was probable that Minna would also continue her journey

in this, at a safe distance from Königsberg.

This proved impossible, and when next morning at break of day we

arrived in Elbing, we found our money exhausted by the lavish use of

the express coach, and were compelled to return; we discovered,

moreover, that even by using the ordinary coach we should be obliged to

pawn the sugar-basin and cake-dish.

This return journey to Königsberg rightly remains one of the saddest

memories of my youth. Of course, I did not for a moment entertain the

idea of remaining in the place; my one thought was how I could best get

away. Hemmed in between the law-suits of my Magdeburg creditors and the

Königsberg tradesmen, who had claims on me for the payment by

instalment of my domestic accounts, my departure could only be carried

out in secrecy. For this very reason, too, it was necessary for me to

raise money, particularly for the long journey from Königsberg to

Dresden, whither I determined to go in quest of my wife, and these

matters detained me for two long and terrible days.

I received no news whatever from Minna; from Möller I ascertained that

she had gone to Dresden, and that Dietrich had only accompanied her for

a short distance on the excuse of helping her in a friendly way.

I succeeded in assuring myself that she really only wished to get away

from a position that filled her with desperation, and for this purpose

had accepted the assistance of a man who sympathised with her, and that

she was for the present seeking rest and shelter with her parents. My

first indignation at the event accordingly subsided to such an extent

that I gradually acquired more sympathy for her in her despair, and

began to reproach myself both for my conduct and for having brought

unhappiness on her.

I became so convinced of the correctness of this view during the

tedious journey to Dresden via Berlin, which I eventually undertook on

the 3rd of June, that when at last I found Minna at the humble abode of

her parents, I was really quite unable to express anything but

repentence and heartbroken sympathy.

It was quite true that Minna thought herself badly treated by me, and

declared that she had only been forced to take this desperate step by

brooding over our impossible position, to which she thought me both

blind and deaf. Her parents were not pleased to see me: the painfully

excited condition of their daughter seemed to afford sufficient

justification for her complaints against me. Whether my own sufferings,

my hasty pursuit, and the heartfelt expression of my grief made any

favourable impression on her, I can really hardly say, as her manner

towards me was very confused and, to a certain extent,

incomprehensible. Still she was impressed when I told her that there

was a good prospect of my obtaining the post of musical conductor at

Riga, where a new theatre was about to be opened under the most

favourable conditions. I felt that I must not press for new resolutions

concerning the regulation of our future relations just then, but must

strive the more earnestly to lay a better foundation for them.

Consequently, after spending a fearful week with my wife under the most

painful conditions, I went to Berlin, there to sign my agreement with

the new director of the Riga theatre. I obtained the appointment on

fairly favourable terms which, I saw, would enable me to keep house in

such a style that Minna could retire from the theatre altogether. By

this means she would be in a position to spare me all humiliation and

anxiety.

On returning to Dresden, I found that Minna was ready to lend a willing

ear to my proposed plans, and I succeeded in inducing her to leave her

parents’ house, which was very cramped for us, and to establish herself

in the country at Blasewitz, near Dresden, to await our removal to

Riga. We found modest lodgings at an inn on the Elbe, in the farm-yard

of which I had often played as a child. Here Minna’s frame of mind

really seemed to be improving. She had begged me not to press her too

hard, and I spared her as much as possible. After a few weeks I thought

I might consider the period of uneasiness past, but was surprised to

find the situation growing worse again without any apparent reason.

Minna then told me of some advantageous offers she had received from

different theatres, and astonished me one day by announcing her

intention of taking a short pleasure trip with a girl friend and her

family. As I felt obliged to avoid putting any restraint upon her, I

offered no objection to the execution of this project, which entailed a

week’s separation, but accompanied her back to her parents myself,

promising to await her return quietly at Blasewitz. A few days later

her eldest sister called to ask me for the written permission required

to make out a passport for my wife. This alarmed me, and I went to

Dresden to ask her parents what their daughter was about. There, to my

surprise, I met with a very unpleasant reception; they reproached me

coarsely for my behaviour to Minna, whom they said I could not even

manage to support, and when I only replied by asking for information as

to the whereabouts of my wife, and about her plans for the future, I

was put off with improbable statements. Tormented by the sharpest

forebodings, and understanding nothing of what had occurred, I went

back to the village, where I found a letter from Königsberg, from

Möller, which poured light on all my misery. Herr Dietrich had gone to

Dresden, and I was told the name of the hotel at which he was staying.

The terrible illumination thrown by this communication upon Minna’s

conduct showed me in a flash what to do. I hurried into town to make

the necessary inquiries at the hotel mentioned, and found that the man

in question had been there, but had moved on again. He had vanished,

and Minna too! I now knew enough to demand of the Fates why, at such an

early age, they had sent me this terrible experience which, as it

seemed to me, had poisoned my whole existence.

I sought consolation for my boundless grief in the society of my sister

Ottilie and her husband, Hermann Brockhaus, an excellent fellow to whom

she had been married for some years. They were then living at their

pretty summer villa in the lovely Grosser Garten, near Dresden. I had

looked them up at once the first time I went to Dresden, but as I had

not at that time the slightest idea of how things were going to turn

out, I had told them nothing, and had seen but little of them. Now I

was moved to break my obstinate silence, and unfold to them the cause

of my misery, with but few reservations.

For the first time I was in a position gratefully to appreciate the

advantages of family intercourse, and of the direct and disinterested

intimacy between blood relations. Explanations were hardly necessary,

and as brother and sister we found ourselves as closely linked now as

we had been when we were children. We arrived at a complete

understanding without having to explain what we meant; I was unhappy,

she was happy; consolation and help followed as a matter of course.

This was the sister to whom I once had read Leubald und Adelaïde in a

thunderstorm; the sister who had listened, filled with astonishment and

sympathy, to that eventful performance of my first overture on

Christmas Eve, and whom I now found married to one of the kindest of

men, Hermann Brockhaus, who soon earned a reputation for himself as an

expert in oriental languages. He was the youngest brother of my elder

brother-in-law, Friedrich Brockhaus. Their union was blessed by two

children; their comfortable means favoured a life free from care, and

when I made my daily pilgrimage from Blasewitz to the famous Grosser

Garten, it was like stepping from a desert into paradise to enter their

house (one of the popular villas), knowing that I would invariably find

a welcome in this happy family circle. Not only was my spirit soothed

and benefited by intercourse with my sister, but my creative instincts,

which had long lain dormant, were stimulated afresh by the society of

my brilliant and learned brother-in-law. It was brought home to me,

without in any way hurting my feelings, that my early marriage,

excusable as it may have been, was yet an error to be retrieved, and my

mind regained sufficient elasticity to compose some sketches, designed

this time not merely to meet the requirements of the theatre as I knew

it. During the last wretched days I had spent with Minna at Blasewitz,

I had read Bulwer Lytton’s novel, Rienzi; during my convalescence in

the bosom of my sympathetic family, I now worked out the scheme for a

grand opera under the inspiration of this book. Though obliged for the

present to return to the limitations of a small theatre, I tried from

this time onwards to aim at enlarging my sphere of action. I sent my

overture, Rule Britannia, to the Philharmonic Society in London, and

tried to get into communication with Scribe in Paris about a setting

for H. Konig’s novel, Die Hohe Braut, which I had sketched out.

Thus I spent the remainder of this summer of ever-happy memory. At the

end of August I had to leave for Riga to take up my new appointment.

Although I knew that my sister Rosalie had shortly before married the

man of her choice, Professor Oswald Marbach of Leipzig, I avoided that

city, probably with the foolish notion of sparing myself any

humiliation, and went straight to Berlin, where I had to receive

certain additional instructions from my future director, and also to

obtain my passport. There I met a younger sister of Minna’s, Amalie

Planer, a singer with a pretty voice, who had joined our opera company

at Magdeburg for a short time. My report of Minna quite overwhelmed

this exceedingly kind-hearted girl. We went to a performance of Fidelia

together, during which she, like myself, burst into tears and sobs.

Refreshed by the sympathetic impression I had received, I went by way

of Schwerin, where I was disappointed in my hopes of finding traces of

Minna, to Lubeck, to wait for a merchant ship going to Riga. We had set

sail for Travemunde when an unfavourable wind set in, and held up our

departure for a week: I had to spend this disagreeable time in a

miserable ship’s tavern. Thrown on my own resources I tried, amongst

other things, to read Till Eulenspiegel, and this popular book first

gave me the idea of a real German comic opera. Long afterwards, when I

was composing the words for my Junger Siegfried, I remember having many

vivid recollections of this melancholy sojourn in Travemunde and my

reading of Till Eulenspiegel. After a voyage of four days we at last

reached port at Bolderaa. I was conscious of a peculiar thrill on

coming into contact with Russian officials, whom I had instinctively

detested since the days of my sympathy with the Poles as a boy. It

seemed to me as if the harbour police must read enthusiasm for the

Poles in my face, and would send me to Siberia on the spot, and I was

the more agreeably surprised, on reaching Riga, to find myself

surrounded by the familiar German element which, above all, pervaded

everything connected with the theatre.

After my unfortunate experiences in connection with the conditions of

small German stages, the way in which this newly opened theatre was run

had at first a calming effect on my mind. A society had been formed by

a number of well-to-do theatre-goers and rich business men to raise, by

voluntary subscription, sufficient money to provide the sort of

management they regarded as ideal with a solid foundation. The director

they appointed was Karl von Holtei, a fairly popular dramatic writer,

who enjoyed a certain reputation in the theatrical world. This man’s

ideas about the stage represented a special tendency, which was at that

time on the decline. He possessed, in addition to his remarkable social

gifts, an extraordinary acquaintance with all the principal people

connected with the theatre during the past twenty years, and belonged

to a society called Die Liebenswurdigen Libertins (‘The Amiable

Libertines’). This was a set of young would-be wits, who looked upon

the stage as a playground licensed by the public for the display of

their mad pranks, from which the middle class held aloof, while people

of culture were steadily losing all interest in the theatre under these

hopeless conditions.

Holtei’s wife had in former days been a popular actress at the

Konigstadt theatre in Berlin, and it was here, at the time when

Henriette Sontag raised it to the height of its fame, that Holtei’s

style had been formed. The production there of his melodrama Leonore

(founded on Burger’s ballad) had in particular earned him a wide

reputation as a writer for the stage, besides which he produced some

Liederspiele, and among them one, entitled Der Alte Feldherr, became

fairly popular. His invitation to Riga had been particularly welcome,

as it bid fair to gratify his craving to absorb himself completely in

the life of the stage; he hoped, in this out-of-the-way place, to

indulge his passion without restraint. His peculiar familiarity of

manner, his inexhaustible store of amusing small talk, and his airy way

of doing business, gave him a remarkable hold on the tradespeople of

Riga, who wished for nothing better than such entertainment as he was

able to give them. They provided him liberally with all the necessary

means and treated him in every respect with entire confidence. Under

his auspices my own engagement had been very easily secured. Surly old

pedants he would have none of, favouring young men on the score of

their youth alone. As far as I myself was concerned, it was enough for

him to know that I belonged to a family which he knew and liked, and

hearing, moreover, of my fervent devotion to modern Italian and French

music in particular, he decided that I was the very man for him. He had

the whole shoal of Bellini’s, Donizetti’s, Adam’s, and Auber’s operatic

scores copied out, and I was to give the good people of Riga the

benefit of them with all possible speed.

The first time I visited Holtei I met an old Leipzig acquaintance,

Heinrich Dorn, my former mentor, who now held the permanent municipal

appointment of choir-master at the church and music-teacher in the

schools. He was pleased to find his curious pupil transformed into a

practical opera conductor of independent position, and no less

surprised to see the eccentric worshipper of Beethoven changed into an

ardent champion of Bellini and Adam. He took me home to his summer

residence, which was built, according to Riga phraseology, ‘in the

fields,’ that is literally, on the sand. While I was giving him some

account of the experiences through which I had passed, I grew conscious

of the strangely deserted look of the place. Feeling frightened and

homeless, my initial uneasiness gradually developed into a passionate

longing to escape from all the whirl of theatrical life which had wooed

me to such inhospitable regions. This uneasy mood was fast dispelling

the flippancy which at Magdeburg had led to my being dragged down to

the level of the most worthless stage society, and had also conduced to

spoil my musical taste. It also contained the germs of a new tendency

which developed during the period of my activity at Riga, brought me

more and more out of touch with the theatre, thereby causing Director

Holtei all the annoyance which inevitably attends disappointment.

For some time, however, I found no difficulty in making the best of a

bad bargain. We were obliged to open the theatre before the company was

complete. To make this possible, we gave a performance of a short comic

opera by C. Blum, called Marie, Max und Michel. For this work I

composed an additional air for a song which Holtei had written for the

bass singer, Gunther; it consisted of a sentimental introduction and a

gay military rondo, and was very much appreciated. Later on, I

introduced another additional song into the Schweizerfamilie, to be

sung by another bass singer, Scheibler; it was of a devotional

character, and pleased not only the public, but myself, and showed

signs of the upheaval which was gradually taking place in my musical

development. I was entrusted with the composition of a tune for a

National Hymn written by Brakel in honour of the Tsar Nicholas’s

birthday. I tried to give it as far as possible the right colouring for

a despotic patriarchal monarch, and once again I achieved some fame,

for it was sung for several successive years on that particular day.

Holtei tried to persuade me to write a bright, gay comic opera, or

rather a musical play, to be performed by our company just as it stood.

I looked up the libretto of my Glucktiche Barenfamilie, and found

Holtei very well disposed towards it (as I have stated elsewhere); but

when I unearthed the little music which I had already composed for it,

I was overcome with disgust at this way of writing; whereupon I made a

present of the book to my clumsy, good-natured friend, Lobmann, my

right-hand man in the orchestra, and never gave it another thought from

that day to this. I managed, however, to get to work on the libretto of

Rienzi, which I had sketched out at Blasewitz. I developed it from

every point of view, on so extravagant a scale, that with this work I

deliberately cut off all possibility of being tempted by circumstances

to produce it anywhere but on one of the largest stages in Europe.

But while this helped to strengthen my endeavour to escape from all the

petty degradations of stage life, new complications arose which

affected me more and more seriously, and offered further opposition to

my aims. The prima donna engaged by Holtei had failed us, and we were

therefore without a singer for grand opera. Under the circumstances,

Holtei joyfully agreed to my proposal to ask Amalie, Minna’s sister

(who was glad to accept an engagement that brought her near me), to

come to Riga at once. In her answer to me from Dresden, where she was

then living, she informed me of Minna’s return to her parents, and of

her present miserable condition owing to a severe illness. I naturally

took this piece of news very coolly, for what I had heard about Minna

since she left me for the last time had forced me to authorise my old

friend at Königsberg to take steps to procure a divorce. It was certain

that Minna had stayed for some time at a hotel in Hamburg with that

ill-omened man, Herr Dietrich, and that she had spread abroad the story

of our separation so unreservedly that the theatrical world in

particular had discussed it in a manner that was positively insulting

to me. I simply informed Amalie of this, and requested her to spare me

any further news of her sister.

Hereupon Minna herself appealed to me, and wrote me a positively

heartrending letter, in which she openly confessed her infidelity. She

declared that she had been driven to it by despair, but that the great

trouble she had thus brought upon herself having taught her a lesson,

all she now wished was to return to the right path. Taking everything

into account, I concluded that she had been deceived in the character

of her seducer, and the knowledge of her terrible position had placed

her both morally and physically in a most lamentable condition, in

which, now ill and wretched, she turned to me again to acknowledge her

guilt, crave my forgiveness, and assure me, in spite of all, that she

had now become fully aware of her love for me. Never before had I heard

such sentiments from Minna, nor was I ever to hear the same from her

again, save on one touching occasion many years later, when similar

outpourings moved and affected me in the same way as this particular

letter had done. In reply I told her that there should never again be

any mention between us of what had occurred, for which I took upon

myself the chief blame; and I can pride myself on having carried out

this resolution to the letter.

When her sister’s engagement was satisfactorily settled, I at once

invited Minna to come to Riga with her. Both gladly accepted my

invitation, and arrived from Dresden at my new home on 19th October,

wintry weather having already set in. With much regret I perceived that

Minna’s health had really suffered, and therefore did all in my power

to provide her with all the domestic comforts and quiet she needed.

This presented difficulties, for my modest income as a conductor was

all I had at my disposal, and we were both firmly determined not to let

Minna go on the stage again. On the other hand, the carrying out of

this resolve, in view of the financial inconvenience it entailed,

produced strange complications, the nature of which was only revealed

to me later, when startling developments divulged the real moral

character of the manager Holtei. For the present I had to let people

think that I was jealous of my wife. I bore patiently with the general

belief that I had good reasons to be so, and rejoiced meanwhile at the

restoration of our peaceful married life, and especially at the sight

of our humble home, which we made as comfortable as our means would

allow, and in the keeping of which Minna’s domestic talents came

strongly to the fore. As we were still childless, and were obliged as a

rule to enlist the help of a dog in order to give life to the domestic

hearth, we once lighted upon the eccentric idea of trying our luck with

a young wolf which was brought into the house as a tiny cub. When we

found, however, that this experiment did not increase the comfort of

our home life, we gave him up after he had been with us a few weeks. We

fared better with sister Amalie; for she, with her good-nature and

simple homely ways, did much to make up for the absence of children for

a time. The two sisters, neither of whom had had any real education,

often returned playfully to the ways of their childhood. When they sang

children’s duets, Minna, though she had had no musical training, always

managed very cleverly to sing seconds, and afterwards, as we sat at our

evening meal, eating Russian salad, salt salmon from the Dwina, or

fresh Russian caviare, we were all three very cheerful and happy far

away in our northern home.

Amalie’s beautiful voice and real vocal talent at first won for her a

very favourable reception with the public, a fact which did us all a

great deal of good. Being, however, very short, and having no very

great gift for acting, the scope of her powers was very limited, and as

she was soon surpassed by more successful competitors, it was a real

stroke of good luck for her that a young officer in the Russian army,

then Captain, now General, Carl von Meek, fell head over ears in love

with the simple girl, and married her a year later. The unfortunate

part of this engagement, however, was that it caused many difficulties,

and brought the first cloud over our menage a trois. For, after a

while, the two sisters quarrelled bitterly, and I had the very

unpleasant experience of living for a whole year in the same house with

two relatives who neither saw nor spoke to each other.

We spent the winter at the beginning of 1838 in a very small dingy

dwelling in the old town; it was not till the spring that we moved into

a pleasanter house in the more salubrious Petersburg suburb, where, in

spite of the sisterly breach before referred to, we led a fairly bright

and cheerful life, as we were often able to entertain many of our

friends and acquaintances in a simple though pleasant fashion. In

addition to members of the stage I knew a few people in the town, and

we received and visited the family of Dorn, the musical director, with

whom I became quite intimate. But it was the second musical director,

Franz Lobmann, a very worthy though not a very gifted man, who became

most faithfully attached to me. However, I did not cultivate many

acquaintances in wider circles, and they grew fewer as the ruling

passion of my life grew steadily stronger; so that when, later on, I

left Riga, after spending nearly two years there, I departed almost as

a stranger, and with as much indifference as I had left Magdeburg and

Königsberg. What, however, specially embittered my departure was a

series of experiences of a particularly disagreeable nature, which

firmly determined me to cut myself off entirely from the necessity of

mixing with any people like those I had met with in my previous

attempts to create a position for myself at the theatre.

Yet it was only gradually that I became quite conscious of all this. At

first, under the safe guidance of my renewed wedded happiness, which

had for a time been so disturbed in its early days, I felt distinctly

better than I had before in all my professional work. The fact that the

material position of the theatrical undertaking was assured exercised a

healthy influence on the performances. The theatre itself was cooped up

in a very narrow space; there was as little room for scenic display on

its tiny stage as there was accommodation for rich musical effects in

the cramped orchestra. In both directions the strictest limits were

imposed, yet I contrived to introduce considerable reinforcements into

an orchestra which was really only calculated for a string quartette,

two first and two second violins, two violas, and one ‘cello. These

successful exertions of mine were the first cause of the dislike Holtei

evinced towards me later on. After this we were able to get good

concerted music for the opera. I found the thorough study of Mehul’s

opera, Joseph in Aegypten, very stimulating. Its noble and simple

style, added to the touching effect of the music, which quite carries

one away, did much towards effecting a favourable change in my taste,

till then warped by my connection with the theatre.

It was most gratifying to feel my former serious taste again aroused by

really good dramatic performances. I specially remember a production of

King Lear, which I followed with the greatest interest, not only at the

actual performances, but at all the rehearsals as well. Yet these

educative impressions tended to make me feel ever more and more

dissatisfied with my work at the theatre. On the one hand, the members

of the company became gradually more distasteful to me, and on the

other I was growing discontented with the management. With regard to

the staff of the theatre, I very soon found out the hollowness, vanity,

and the impudent selfishness of this uncultured and undisciplined class

of people, for I had now lost my former liking for the Bohemian life

that had such an attraction for me at Magdeburg. Before long there were

but a few members of our company with whom I had not quarrelled, thanks

to one or the other of these drawbacks. But my saddest experience was,

that in such disputes, into which in fact I was led simply by my zeal

for the artistic success of the performances as a whole, not only did I

receive no support from Holtei, the director, but I actually made him

my enemy. He even declared publicly that our theatre had become far too

respectable for his taste, and tried to convince me that good

theatrical performances could not be given by a strait-laced company.

In his opinion the idea of the dignity of theatrical art was pedantic

nonsense, and he thought light serio-comic vaudeville the only class of

performance worth considering. Serious opera, rich musical ensemble,

was his particular aversion, and my demands for this irritated him so

that he met them only with scorn and indignant refusals. Of the strange

connection between this artistic bias and his taste in the domain of

morality I was also to become aware, to my horror, in due course. For

the present I felt so repelled by the declaration of his artistic

antipathies, as to let my dislike for the theatre as a profession

steadily grow upon me. I still took pleasure in some good performances

which I was able to get up, under favourable circumstances, at the

larger theatre at Mitau, to where the company went for a time in the

early part of the summer. Yet it was while I was there, spending most

of my time reading Bulwer Lytton’s novels, that I made a secret resolve

to try hard to free myself from all connection with the only branch of

theatrical art which had so far been open to me.

The composition of my Rienzi, the text of which I had finished in the

early days of my sojourn in Riga, was destined to bridge me over to the

glorious world for which I had longed so intensely. I had laid aside

the completion of my Gluckliche Barenfamilie, for the simple reason

that the lighter character of this piece would have thrown me more into

contact with the very theatrical people I most despised. My greatest

consolation now was to prepare Rienzi with such an utter disregard of

the means which were available there for its production, that my desire

to produce it would force me out of the narrow confines of this puny

theatrical circle to seek a fresh connection with one of the larger

theatres. It was after our return from Mitau, in the middle of the

summer of 1838, that I set to work on this composition, and by so doing

roused myself to a state of enthusiasm which, considering my position,

was nothing less than desperate dare-devilry. All to whom I confided my

plan perceived at once, on the mere mention of my subject, that I was

preparing to break away from my present position, in which there could

be no possibility of producing my work, and I was looked upon as

light-headed and fit only for an asylum.

To all my acquaintances my procedure seemed stupid and reckless. Even

the former patron of my peculiar Leipzig overture thought it

impracticable and eccentric, seeing that I had again turned my back on

light opera. He expressed this opinion very freely in the Neue

Zeitschrift fur Musik, in a report of a concert I had given towards the

end of the previous winter, and openly ridiculed the Magdeburg Columbus

Overture and the Rule Britannia Overture previously mentioned. I myself

had not taken any pleasure in the performance of either of these

overtures, as my predilection for cornets, strongly marked in both

these overtures, again played me a sorry trick, as I had evidently

expected too much of our Riga musicians, and had to endure all kinds of

disappointment on the occasion of the performance. As a complete

contrast to my extravagant setting of Rienzi, this same director, H.

Dorn, had set to work to write an opera in which he had most carefully

borne in mind the conditions obtaining at the Riga theatre. Der Schoffe

van Paris, an historical operetta of the period of the siege of Paris

by Joan of Arc, was practised and performed by us to the complete

satisfaction of the composer. However, the success of this work gave me

no reason for abandoning my project to complete my Rienzi, and I was

secretly pleased to find that I could regard this success without a

trace of envy. Though animated by no feeling of rivalry, I gradually

gave up associating with the Riga artists, confining myself chiefly to

the performance of the duties I had undertaken, and worked away at the

two first acts of my big opera without troubling myself at all whether

I should ever get so far as to see it produced.

The serious and bitter experiences I had had so early in life had done

much to guide me towards that intensely earnest side of my nature that

had manifested itself in my earliest youth. The effect of these bitter

experiences was now to be still further emphasised by other sad

impressions. Not long after Minna had rejoined me, I received from home

the news of the death of my sister Rosalie. It was the first time in my

life that I had experienced the passing away of one near and dear to

me. The death of this sister struck me as a most cruel and significant

blow of fate; it was out of love and respect for her that I had turned

away so resolutely from my youthful excesses, and it was to gain her

sympathy that I had devoted special thought and care to my first great

works. When the passions and cares of life had come upon me and driven

me away from my home, it was she who had read deep down into my sorely

stricken heart, and who had bidden me that anxious farewell on my

departure from Leipzig. At the time of my disappearance, when the news

of my wilful marriage and of my consequent unfortunate position reached

my family, it was she who, as my mother informed me later, never lost

her faith in me, but who always cherished the hope that I would one day

reach the full development of my capabilities and make a genuine

success of my life.

Now, at the news of her death, and illuminated by the recollection of

that one impressive farewell, as by a flash of lightning I saw the

immense value my relations with this sister had been to me, and I did

not fully realise the extent of her influence until later on, when,

after my first striking successes, my mother tearfully lamented that

Rosalie had not lived to witness them. It really did me good to be

again in communication with my family. My mother and sisters had had

news of my doings somehow or other, and I was deeply touched, in the

letters which I was now receiving from them, to hear no reproaches

anent my headstrong and apparently heartless behaviour, but only

sympathy and heartfelt solicitude. My family had also received

favourable reports about my wife’s good qualities, a fact about which I

was particularly glad, as I was thus spared the difficulties of

defending her questionable behaviour to me, which I should have been at

pains to excuse. This produced a salutary calm in my soul, which had so

recently been a prey to the worst anxieties. All that had driven me

with such passionate haste to an improvident and premature marriage,

all that had consequently weighed on me so ruinously, now seemed set at

rest, leaving peace in its stead. And although the ordinary cares of

life still pressed on me for many years, often in a most vexatious and

troublesome form, yet the anxieties attendant on my ardent youthful

wishes were in a manner subdued and calm. From thence forward till the

attainment of my professional independence, all my life’s struggles

could be directed entirely towards that more ideal aim which, from the

time of the conception of my Rienzi, was to be my only guide through

life.

It was only later that I first realised the real character of my life

in Riga, from the utterance of one of its inhabitants, who was

astonished to learn of the success of a man of whose importance, during

the whole of his two years’ sojourn in the small capital of Livonia,

nothing had been known. Thrown entirely on my own resources, I was a

stranger to every one. As I mentioned before, I kept aloof from all the

theatre folk, in consequence of my increasing dislike of them, and

therefore, when at the end of March, 1839, at the close of my second

winter there, I was given my dismissal by the management, although this

occurrence surprised me for other reasons, yet I felt fully reconciled

to this compulsory change in my life. The reasons which led to this

dismissal were, however, of such a nature that I could only regard it

as one of the most disagreeable experiences of my life. Once, when I

was lying dangerously ill, I heard of Holtei’s real feelings towards

me. I had caught a severe cold in the depth of winter at a theatrical

rehearsal, and it at once assumed a serious character, owing to the

fact that my nerves were in a state of constant irritation from the

continual annoyance and vexatious worry caused by the contemptible

character of the theatrical management. It was just at the time when a

special performance of the opera Norma was to be given by our company

in Mitau. Holtei insisted on my getting up from a sick-bed to make this

wintry journey, and thus to expose myself to the danger of seriously

increasing my cold in the icy theatre at Mitau. Typhoid fever was the

consequence, and this pulled me down to such an extent that Holtei, who

heard of my condition, is said to have remarked at the theatre that I

should probably never conduct again, and that, to all intents and

purposes, ‘I was on my last legs.’ It was to a splendid homoeopathic

physician, Dr. Prutzer, that I owed my recovery and my life. Not long

after that Holtei left our theatre and Riga for ever; his occupation

there, with ‘the far too respectable conditions,’ as he expressed it,

had become intolerable to him. In addition, however, circumstances had

arisen in his domestic life (which had been much affected by the death

of his wife) which seemed to make him consider a complete break with

Riga eminently desirable. But to my astonishment I now first became

aware that I too had unconsciously been a sufferer from the troubles he

had brought upon himself. When Holtei’s successor in the

management—Joseph Hoffmann the singer—informed me that his predecessor

had made it a condition to his taking over the post that he should

enter into the same engagement that Holtei had made with the conductor

Dorn for the post which I had hitherto filled, and my reappointment had

therefore been made an impossibility, my wife met my astonishment at

this news by giving me the reason, of which for some considerable time

past she had been well aware, namely, Holtei’s special dislike of us

both. When I was afterwards informed by Minna of what had happened—she

having purposely kept it from me all this time, so as not to cause bad

feeling between me and my director—a ghastly light was thrown upon the

whole affair. I did indeed remember perfectly how, soon after Minna’s

arrival in Riga, I had been particularly pressed by Holtei not to

prevent my wife’s engagement at the theatre. I asked him to talk things

quietly over with her, so that he might see that Minna’s unwillingness

rested on a mutual understanding, and not on any jealousy on my part. I

had intentionally given him the time when I was engaged at the theatre

on rehearsals for the necessary discussions with my wife. At the end of

these meetings I had, on my return, often found Minna in a very excited

condition, and at length she declared emphatically that under no

circumstances would she accept the engagement offered by Holtei. I had

also noticed in Minna’s demeanour towards me a strange anxiety to know

why I was not unwilling to allow Holtei to try to persuade her. Now

that the catastrophe had occurred, I learned that Holtei had in fact

used these interviews for making improper advances to my wife, the

nature of which I only realised with difficulty on further acquaintance

with this man’s peculiarities, and after having heard of other

instances of a similar nature. I then discovered that Holtei considered

it an advantage to get himself talked about in connection with pretty

women, in order thus to divert the attention of the public from other

conduct even more disreputable. After this Minna was exceedingly

indignant at Holtei, who, finding his own suit rejected, appeared as

the medium for another suitor, on whose behalf he urged that he would

think none the worse of her for rejecting him, a grey-haired and

penniless man, but at the same time advocated the suit of Brandenburg,

a very wealthy and handsome young merchant. His fierce indignation at

this double repulse, his humiliation at having revealed his real nature

to no purpose, seems, to judge from Minna’s observations, to have been

exceedingly great. I now understood too well that his frequent and

profoundly contemptuous sallies against respectable actors and

actresses had not been mere spirited exaggerations, but that he had

probably often had to complain of being put thoroughly to shame on this

account.

The fact that the playing of such criminal parts as the one he had had

in view with my wife was unable to divert the ever-increasing attention

of the outside world from his vicious and dissolute habits, does not

seem to have escaped him; for those behind the scenes told me candidly

that it was owing to the fear of very unpleasant revelations that he

had suddenly decided to give up his position at Riga altogether. Even

in much later years I heard about Holtei’s bitter dislike of me, a

dislike which showed itself, among other things, in his denunciation of

The Music of the Future,[8] and of its tendency to jeopardise the

simplicity of pure sentiment. I have previously mentioned that he

displayed so much personal animosity against me during the latter part

of the time we were together in Riga that he vented his hostility upon

me in every possible way. Up to that time I had felt inclined to

ascribe it to the divergence of our respective views on artistic

points.

[8] _Zukunftsmusik_ is a pamphlet revealing some of Wagner’s artistic

aims and aspirations, written 1860-61.—EDITOR.

To my dismay I now became aware that personal considerations alone were

at the bottom of all this, and I blushed to realise that by my former

unreserved confidence in a man whom I thought was absolutely honest, I

had based my knowledge of human nature on such very weak foundations.

But still greater was my disappointment when I discovered the real

character of my friend H. Dorn. During the whole time of our

intercourse at Riga, he, who formerly treated me more like a

good-natured elder brother, had become my most confidential friend. We

saw and visited each other almost daily, very frequently in our

respective homes. I kept not a single secret from him, and the

performance of his Schoffe van Paris under my direction was as

successful as if it had been under his own. Now, when I heard that my

post had been given to him, I felt obliged to ask him about it, in

order to learn whether there was any mistake on his part as to my

intention regarding the position I had hitherto held. But from his

letter in reply I could clearly see that Dorn had really made use of

Holtei’s dislike for me to extract from him, before his departure, an

arrangement which was both binding on his successor and also in his

(Dorn’s) own favour. As my friend he ought to have known that he could

benefit by this agreement only in the event of my resigning my

appointment in Riga, because in our confidential conversations, which

continued to the end, he always carefully refrained from touching on

the possibility of my going away or remaining. In fact, he declared

that Holtei had distinctly told him he would on no account re-engage

me, as I could not get on with the singers. He added that after this

one could not take it amiss if he, who had been inspired with fresh

enthusiasm for the theatre by the success of his Schoffe von Paris, had

seized and turned to his own advantage the chance offered to him.

Moreover, he had gathered from my confidential communications that I

was very awkwardly situated, and that, owing to my small salary having

been cut down by Holtei from the very beginning, I was in a very

precarious position on account of the demands of my creditors in

Königsberg and Magdeburg. It appeared that these people had employed

against me a lawyer, who was a friend of Dorn’s, and that,

consequently, he had come to the conclusion that I would not be able to

remain in Riga. Therefore, even as my friend, he had felt his

conscience quite clear in accepting Holtei’s proposal.

In order not to leave him in the complacent enjoyment of this

self-deception, I put it clearly before him that he could not be

ignorant of the fact that a higher salary had been promised to me for

the third year of my contract; and that, by the establishment of

orchestral concerts, which had already made a favourable start, I now

saw my way to getting free from those long-standing debts, having

already overcome the difficulties of the removal and settling down. I

also asked him how he would act if I saw it was to my own interest to

retain my post, and to call on him to resign his agreement with Holtei,

who, as a matter of fact, after his departure from Riga, had withdrawn

his alleged reason for my dismissal. To this I received no answer, nor

have I had one up to the present day; but, on the other hand, in 1865,

I was astonished to see Dorn enter my house in Munich unannounced, and

when to his joy I recognised him, he stepped up to me with a gesture

which clearly showed his intention of embracing me. Although I managed

to evade this, yet I soon saw the difficulty of preventing him from

addressing me with the familiar form of ‘thou,’ as the attempt to do so

would have necessitated explanations that would have been a useless

addition to all my worries just then; for it was the time when my

Tristan was being produced.

Such a man was Heinrich Dorn. Although, after the failure of three

operas, he had retired in disgust from the theatre to devote himself

exclusively to the commercial side of music, yet the success of his

opera, Der Schoffe von Paris, in Riga helped him back to a permanent

place among the dramatic musicians of Germany. But to this position he

was first dragged from obscurity, across the bridge of infidelity to

his friend, and by the aid of virtue in the person of Director Holtei,

thanks to a magnanimous oversight on the part of Franz Listz. The

preference of King Friedrich Wilhelm IV. for church scenes contributed

to secure him eventually his important position at the greatest lyric

theatre in Germany, the Royal Opera of Berlin. For he was prompted far

less by his devotion to the dramatic muse than by his desire to secure

a good position in some important German city, when, as already hinted,

through Liszt’s recommendation he was appointed musical director of

Cologne Cathedral. During a fete connected with the building of the

cathedral he managed, as a musician, so to work upon the Prussian

monarch’s religious feelings, that he was appointed to the dignified

post of musical conductor at the Royal Theatre, in which capacity he

long continued to do honour to German dramatic music in conjunction

with Wilhelm Taubert.

I must give J. Hoffmann, who from this time forward was the manager of

the Riga theatre, the credit of having felt the treachery practised

upon me very deeply indeed. He told me that his contract with Dorn

bound him only for one year, and that the moment the twelve months had

elapsed he wished to come to a fresh agreement with me. As soon as this

was known, my patrons in Riga came forward with offers of teaching

engagements and arrangements for sundry concerts, by way of

compensating me for the year’s salary which I should lose by being away

from my work as a conductor. Though I was much gratified by these

offers, yet, as I have already pointed out, the longing to break loose

from the kind of theatrical life which I had experienced up to that

time so possessed me that I resolutely seized this chance of abandoning

my former vocation for an entirely new one. Not without some

shrewdness, I played upon my wife’s indignation at the treachery I had

suffered, in order to make her fall in with my eccentric notion of

going to Paris. Already in my conception of Rienzi I had dreamed of the

most magnificent theatrical conditions, but now, without halting at any

intermediate stations, my one desire was to reach the very heart of all

European grand opera. While still in Magdeburg I had made H. Konig’s

romance, Die Hohe Braut, the subject of a grand opera in five acts, and

in the most luxurious French style. After the scenic draft of this

opera, which had been translated into French, was completely worked

out, I sent it from Königsberg to Scribe in Paris. With this manuscript

I sent a letter to the famous operatic poet, in which I suggested that

he might make use of my plot, on condition that he would secure me the

composition of the music for the Paris Opera House. To convince him of

my ability to compose Parisian operatic music, I also sent him the

score of my Liebesverbot. At the same time I wrote to Meyerbeer,

informing him of my plans, and begging him to support me. I was not at

all disheartened at receiving no reply, for I was content to know that

now at last ‘I was in communication with Paris.’ When, therefore, I

started out upon my daring journey from Riga, I seemed to have a

comparatively serious object in view, and my Paris projects no longer

struck me as being altogether in the air. In addition to this I now

heard that my youngest sister, Cecilia, had become betrothed to a

certain Eduard Avenarius, an employee of the Brockhaus book-selling

firm, and that he had undertaken the management of their Paris branch.

To him I applied for news of Scribe, and for an answer to the

application I had made to that gentleman some years previously.

Avenarius called on Scribe, and from him received an acknowledgment of

the receipt of my earlier communication. Scribe also showed that he had

some recollection of the subject itself; for he said that, so far as he

could remember, there was a joueuse de harpe in the piece, who was

ill-treated by her brother. The fact that this merely incidental item

had alone remained in his memory led me to conclude that he had not

extended his acquaintance with the piece beyond the first act, in which

the item in question occurs. When, moreover, I heard that he had

nothing to say in regard to my score, except that he had had portions

of it played over to him by a pupil of the Conservatoire, I really

could not flatter myself that he had entered into definite and

conscious relations with me. And yet I had palpable evidence in a

letter of his to Avenarius, which the latter forwarded to me, that

Scribe had actually occupied himself with my work, and that I was

indeed in communication with him, and this letter of Scribe’s made such

an impression upon my wife, who was by no means inclined to be

sanguine, that she gradually overcame her apprehensions in regard to

the Paris adventure. At last it was fixed and settled that on the

expiry of my second year’s contract in Riga (that is to say, in the

coming summer, 1839), we should journey direct from Riga to Paris, in

order that I might try my luck there as a composer of opera.

The production of my Rienzi now began to assume greater importance. The

composition of its second act was finished before we started, and into

this I wove a heroic ballet of extravagant dimensions. It was now

imperative that I should speedily acquire a knowledge of French, a

language which, during my classical studies at the Grammar School, I

had contemptuously laid aside. As there were only four weeks in which

to recover the time I had lost, I engaged an excellent French master.

But as I soon realised that I could achieve but little in so short a

time, I utilised the hours of the lessons in order to obtain from him,

under the pretence of receiving instruction, an idiomatic translation

of my Rienzi libretto. This I wrote with red ink on such parts of the

score as were finished, so that on reaching Paris I might immediately

submit my half-finished opera to French judges of art.

Everything now seemed to be carefully prepared for my departure, and

all that remained to be done was to raise the necessary funds for my

undertaking. But in this respect the outlook was bad. The sale of our

modest household furniture, the proceeds of a benefit concert, and my

meagre savings only sufficed to satisfy the importunate demands of my

creditors in Magdeburg and Königsberg. I knew that if I were to devote

all my cash to this purpose, there would not be a farthing left. Some

way out of the fix must be found, and this our old Königsberg friend,

Abraham Möller, suggested in his usual flippant and obscure manner.

Just at this critical moment he paid us a second visit to Riga. I

acquainted him with the difficulties of our position, and all the

obstacles which stood in the way of my resolve to go to Paris. In his

habitual laconical way he counselled me to reserve all my savings for

our journey, and to settle with my creditors when my Parisian successes

had provided the necessary means. To help us in carrying out this plan,

he offered to convey us in his carriage across the Russian frontier at

top speed to an East Prussian port. We should have to cross the Russian

frontier without passports, as these had been already impounded by our

foreign creditors. He assured us that we should find it quite simple to

carry out this very hazardous expedition, and declared that he had a

friend on a Prussian estate close to the frontier who would render us

very effective assistance. My eagerness to escape at any price from my

previous circumstances, and to enter with all possible speed upon the

wider field, in which I hoped very soon to realise my ambition, blinded

me to all the unpleasantnesses which the execution of his proposal must

entail. Director Hoffmann, who considered himself bound to serve me to

the utmost of his ability, facilitated my departure by allowing me to

leave some months before the expiration of my engagement. After

continuing to conduct the operatic portion of the Mitau theatrical

season through the month of June, we secretly started in a special

coach hired by Möller and under his protection. The goal of our journey

was Paris, but many unheard-of hardships were in store for us before we

were to reach that city.

The sense of contentment involuntarily aroused by our passage through

the fruitful Courland in the luxuriant month of July, and by the sweet

illusion that now at last I had cut myself loose from a hateful

existence, to enter upon a new and boundless path of fortune, was

disturbed from its very outset by the miserable inconveniences

occasioned by the presence of a huge Newfoundland dog called Robber.

This beautiful creature, originally the property of a Riga merchant,

had, contrary to the nature of his race, become devotedly attached to

me. After I had left Riga, and during my long stay in Mitau, Robber

incessantly besieged my empty house, and so touched the hearts of my

landlord and the neighbours by his fidelity, that they sent the dog

after me by the conductor of the coach to Mitau, where I greeted him

with genuine effusion, and swore that, in spite of all difficulties, I

would never part with him again. Whatever might happen, the dog must go

with us to Paris. And yet, even to get him into the carriage proved

almost impossible. All my endeavours to find him a place in or about

the vehicle were in vain, and, to my great grief, I had to watch the

huge northern beast, with his shaggy coat, gallop all day long in the

blazing sun beside the carriage. At last, moved to pity by his

exhaustion, and unable to bear the sight any longer, I hit upon a most

ingenious plan for bringing the great animal with us into the carriage,

where, in spite of its being full to overflowing, he was just able to

find room.

On the evening of the second day we reached the Russo-Prussian

frontier. Möller’s evident anxiety as to whether we should be able to

cross it safely showed us plainly that the matter was one of some

danger. His good friend from the other side duly turned up with a small

carriage, as arranged, and in this conveyance drove Minna, myself, and

Robber through by paths to a certain point, whence he led us on foot to

a house of exceedingly suspicious exterior, where, after handing us

over to a guide, he left us. There we had to wait until sundown, and

had ample leisure in which to realise that we were in a smugglers’

drinking den, which gradually became filled to suffocation with Polish

Jews of most forbidding aspect.

At last we were summoned to follow our guide. A few hundred feet away,

on the slope of a hill, lay the ditch which runs the whole length of

the Russian frontier, watched continually and at very narrow intervals

by Cossacks. Our chance was to utilise the few moments after the relief

of the watch, during which the sentinels were elsewhere engaged. We

had, therefore, to run at full speed down the hill, scramble through

the ditch, and then hurry along until we were beyond the range of the

soldiers’ guns; for the Cossacks were bound in case of discovery to

fire upon us even on the other side of the ditch. In spite of my almost

passionate anxiety for Minna, I had observed with singular pleasure the

intelligent behaviour of Robber, who, as though conscious of the

danger, silently kept close to our side, and entirely dispelled my fear

that he would give trouble during our dangerous passage. At last our

trusted helpmeet reappeared, and was so delighted that he hugged us all

in his arms. Then, placing us once more in his carriage, he drove us to

the inn of the Prussian frontier village, where my friend Möller,

positively sick with anxiety, leaped sobbing and rejoicing out of bed

to greet us.

It was only now that I began to realise the danger to which I had

exposed, not only myself, but also my poor Minna, and the folly of

which I had been guilty through my ignorance of the terrible

difficulties of secretly crossing the frontier—difficulties concerning

which Möller had foolishly allowed me to remain in ignorance.

I was simply at a loss to convey to my poor exhausted wife how

extremely I regretted the whole affair.

And yet the difficulties we had just overcome were but the prelude to

the calamities incidental to this adventurous journey which had such a

decisive influence on my life. The following day, when, with courage

renewed, we drove through the rich plain of Tilsit to Arnau, near

Königsberg, we decided, as the next stage of our journey, to proceed

from the Prussian harbour of Pillau by sailing vessel to London. Our

principal reason for this was the consideration of the dog we had with

us. It was the easiest way to take him. To convey him by coach from

Königsberg to Paris was out of the question, and railways were unknown.

But another consideration was our budget; the whole result of my

desperate efforts amounted to not quite one hundred ducats, which were

to cover not only the journey to Paris, but our expenses there until I

should have earned something. Therefore, after a few days’ rest in the

inn at Arnau, we drove to the little seaport town of Pillau, again

accompanied by Möller, in one of the ordinary local conveyances, which

was not much better than a wagon. In order to avoid Königsberg, we

passed through the smaller villages and over bad roads. Even this short

distance was not to be covered without accident. The clumsy conveyance

upset in a farmyard, and Minna was so severely indisposed by the

accident, owing to an internal shock, that I had to drag her—with the

greatest difficulty, as she was quite helpless—to a peasant’s house.

The people were surly and dirty, and the night we spent there was a

painful one for the poor sufferer. A delay of several days occurred

before the departure of the Pillau vessel, but this was welcome as a

respite to allow of Minna’s recovery. Finally, as the captain was to

take us without a passport, our going on board was accompanied by

exceptional difficulties. We had to contrive to slip past the harbour

watch to our vessel in a small boat before daybreak. Once on board, we

still had the troublesome task of hauling Robber up the steep side of

the vessel without attracting attention, and after that to conceal

ourselves at once below deck, in order to escape the notice of

officials visiting the ship before its departure. The anchor was

weighed, and at last, as the land faded gradually out of sight, we

thought we could breathe freely and feel at ease.

We were on board a merchant vessel of the smallest type. She was called

the Thetis; a bust of the nymph was erected in the bows, and she

carried a crew of seven men, including the captain. With good weather,

such as was to be expected in summer, the journey to London was

estimated to take eight days. However, before we had left the Baltic,

we were delayed by a prolonged calm. I made use of the time to improve

my knowledge of French by the study of a novel, La Derniere Aldini, by

George Sand. We also derived some entertainment from associating with

the crew. There was an elderly and peculiarly taciturn sailor named

Koske, whom we observed carefully because Robber, who was usually so

friendly, had taken an irreconcilable dislike to him. Oddly enough,

this fact was to add in some degree to our troubles in the hour of

danger. After seven days’ sailing we were no further than Copenhagen,

where, without leaving the vessel, we seized an opportunity of making

our very spare diet on board more bearable by various purchases of food

and drink. In good spirits we sailed past the beautiful castle of

Elsinore, the sight of which brought me into immediate touch with my

youthful impressions of Hamlet. We were sailing all unsuspecting

through the Cattegat to the Skagerack, when the wind, which had at

first been merely unfavourable, and had forced us to a process of weary

tacking, changed on the second day to a violent storm. For twenty-four

hours we had to struggle against it under disadvantages which were

quite new to us. In the captain’s painfully narrow cabin, in which one

of us was without a proper berth, we were a prey to sea-sickness and

endless alarms. Unfortunately, the brandy cask, at which the crew

fortified themselves during their strenuous work, was let into a hollow

under the seat on which I lay at full length. Now it happened to be

Koske who came most frequently in search of the refreshment which was

such a nuisance to me, and this in spite of the fact that on each

occasion he had to encounter Robber in mortal combat. The dog flew at

him with renewed rage each time he came climbing down the narrow steps.

I was thus compelled to make efforts which, in my state of complete

exhaustion from sea-sickness, rendered my condition every time more

critical. At last, on 27th July, the captain was compelled by the

violence of the west wind to seek a harbour on the Norwegian coast. And

how relieved I was to behold that far-reaching rocky coast, towards

which we were being driven at such speed! A Norwegian pilot came to

meet us in a small boat, and, with experienced hand, assumed control of

the Thetis, whereupon in a very short time I was to have one of the

most marvellous and most beautiful impressions of my life. What I had

taken to be a continuous line of cliffs turned out on our approach to

be a series of separate rocks projecting from the sea. Having sailed

past them, we perceived that we were surrounded, not only in front and

at the sides, but also at our back, by these reefs, which closed in

behind us so near together that they seemed to form a single chain of

rocks. At the same time the hurricane was so broken by the rocks in our

rear that the further we sailed through this ever-changing labyrinth of

projecting rocks, the calmer the sea became, until at last the vessel’s

progress was perfectly smooth and quiet as we entered one of those long

sea-roads running through a giant ravine—for such the Norwegian fjords

appeared to me.

A feeling of indescribable content came over me when the enormous

granite walls echoed the hail of the crew as they cast anchor and

furled the sails. The sharp rhythm of this call clung to me like an

omen of good cheer, and shaped itself presently into the theme of the

seamen’s song in my Fliegender Holländer. The idea of this opera was,

even at that time, ever present in my mind, and it now took on a

definite poetic and musical colour under the influence of my recent

impressions. Well, our next move was to go on shore. I learned that the

little fishing village at which we landed was called Sandwike, and was

situated a few miles away from the much larger town of Arendal. We were

allowed to put up at the hospitable house of a certain ship’s captain,

who was then away at sea, and here we were able to take the rest we so

much needed, as the unabated violence of the wind in the open detained

us there two days. On 31st July the captain insisted on leaving,

despite the pilot’s warning. We had been on board the Thetis a few

hours, and were in the act of eating a lobster for the first time in

our lives, when the captain and the sailors began to swear violently at

the pilot, whom I could see at the helm, rigid with fear, striving to

avoid a reef—barely visible above the water—towards which our ship was

being driven. Great was our terror at this violent tumult, for we

naturally thought ourselves in the most extreme danger. The vessel did

actually receive a severe shock, which, to my vivid imagination, seemed

like the splitting up of the whole ship. Fortunately, however, it

transpired that only the side of our vessel had fouled the reef, and

there was no immediate danger. Nevertheless, the captain deemed it

necessary to steer for a harbour to have the vessel examined, and we

returned to the coast and anchored at another point. The captain then

offered to take us in a small boat with two sailors to Tromsond, a town

of some importance situated at a few hours’ distance, where he had to

invite the harbour officials to examine his ship. This again proved a

most attractive and impressive excursion. The view of one fjord in

particular, which extended far inland, worked on my imagination like

some unknown, awe-inspiring desert. This impression was intensified,

during a long walk from Tromsond up to the plateau, by the terribly

depressing effect of the dun moors, bare of tree or shrub, boasting

only a covering of scanty moss, which stretch away to the horizon, and

merge imperceptibly into the gloomy sky. It was long after dark when we

returned from this trip in our little boat, and my wife was very

anxious. The next morning (1st August), reassured as to the condition

of the vessel, and the wind favouring us, we were able to go to sea

without further hindrance.

After four days’ calm sailing a strong north wind arose, which drove us

at uncommon speed in the right direction. We began to think ourselves

nearly at the end of our journey when, on 6th August, the wind changed,

and the storm began to rage with unheard-of violence. On the 7th, a

Wednesday, at half-past two in the afternoon, we thought ourselves in

imminent danger of death. It was not the terrible force with which the

vessel was hurled up and down, entirely at the mercy of this sea

monster, which appeared now as a fathomless abyss, now as a steep

mountain peak, that filled me with mortal dread; my premonition of some

terrible crisis was aroused by the despondency of the crew, whose

malignant glances seemed superstitiously to point to us as the cause of

the threatening disaster. Ignorant of the trifling occasion for the

secrecy of our journey, the thought may have occurred to them that our

need of escape had arisen from suspicious or even criminal

circumstances. The captain himself seemed, in his extreme distress, to

regret having taken us on board; for we had evidently brought him

ill-luck on this familiar passage—usually a rapid and uncomplicated

one, especially in summer. At this particular moment there raged,

beside the tempest on the water, a furious thunderstorm overhead, and

Minna expressed the fervent wish to be struck by lightning with me

rather than to sink, living, into the fearful flood. She even begged me

to bind her to me, so that we might not be parted as we sank. Yet

another night was spent amid these incessant terrors, which only our

extreme exhaustion helped to mitigate.

The following day the storm had subsided; the wind remained

unfavourable, but was mild. The captain now tried to find our bearings

by means of his astronomical instruments. He complained of the sky,

which had been overcast so many days, swore that he would give much for

a single glimpse of the sun or the stars, and did not conceal the

uneasiness he felt at not being able to indicate our whereabouts with

certainty. He consoled himself, however, by following a ship which was

sailing some knots ahead in the same direction, and whose movements he

observed closely through the telescope. Suddenly he sprang up in great

alarm, and gave a vehement order to change our course. He had seen the

ship in front go aground on a sand-bank, from which, he asserted, she

could not extricate herself; for he now realised that we were near the

most dangerous part of the belt of sand-banks bordering the Dutch coast

for a considerable distance. By dint of very skilful sailing, we were

enabled to keep the opposite course towards the English coast, which we

in fact sighted on the evening of 9th August, in the neighbourhood of

Southwold. I felt new life come into me when I saw in the far distance

the English pilots racing for our ship. As competition is free among

pilots on the English coast, they come out as far as possible to meet

incoming vessels, even when the risks are very great.

The winner in our case was a powerful grey-haired man, who, after much

vain battling with the seething waves, which tossed his light boat away

from our ship at each attempt, at last succeeded in boarding the

Thetis. (Our poor, hardly-used boat still bore the name, although the

wooden figure-head of our patron nymph had been hurled into the sea

during our first storm in the Cattegat—an ill-omened incident in the

eyes of the crew.) We were filled with pious gratitude when this quiet

English sailor, whose hands were torn and bleeding from his repeated

efforts to catch the rope thrown to him on his approach, took over the

rudder. His whole personality impressed us most agreeably, and he

seemed to us the absolute guarantee of a speedy deliverance from our

terrible afflictions. We rejoiced too soon, however, for we still had

before us the perilous passage through the sand-banks off the English

coast, where, as I was assured, nearly four hundred ships are wrecked

on an average every year. We were fully twenty-four hours (from the

evening of the 10th to the 11th of August) amid these sandbanks,

fighting a westerly gale, which hindered our progress so seriously that

we only reached the mouth of the Thames on the evening of the 12th of

August. My wife had, up to that point, been so nervously affected by

the innumerable danger signals, consisting chiefly of small guardships

painted bright red and provided with bells on account of the fog, that

she could not close her eyes, day or night, for the excitement of

watching for them and pointing them out to the sailors. I, on the

contrary, found these heralds of human proximity and deliverance so

consoling that, despite Minna’s reproaches, I indulged in a long

refreshing sleep. Now that we were anchored in the mouth of the Thames,

waiting for daybreak, I found myself in the best of spirits; I dressed,

washed, and even shaved myself up on deck near the mast, while Minna

and the whole exhausted crew were wrapped in deep slumber. And with

deepening interest I watched the growing signs of life in this famous

estuary. Our desire for a complete release from our detested

confinement led us, after we had sailed a little way up, to hasten our

arrival in London by going on board a passing steamer at Gravesend. As

we neared the capital, our astonishment steadily increased at the

number of ships of all sorts that filled the river, the houses, the

streets, the famous docks, and other maritime constructions which lined

the banks. When at last we reached London Bridge, this incredibly

crowded centre of the greatest city in the world, and set foot on land

after our terrible three weeks’ voyage, a pleasurable sensation of

giddiness overcame us as our legs carried us staggering through the

deafening uproar. Robber seemed to be similarly affected, for he

whisked round the corners like a mad thing, and threatened to get lost

every other minute. But we soon sought safety in a cab, which took us,

on our captain’s recommendation, to the Horseshoe Tavern, near the

Tower, and here we had to make our plans for the conquest of this giant

metropolis.

The neighbourhood in which we found ourselves was such that we decided

to leave it with all possible haste. A very friendly little hunchbacked

Jew from Hamburg suggested better quarters in the West End, and I

remember vividly our drive there, in one of the tiny narrow cabs then

in use, the journey lasting fully an hour. They were built to carry two

people, who had to sit facing each other, and we therefore had to lay

our big dog crosswise from window to window. The sights we saw from our

whimsical nook surpassed anything we had imagined, and we arrived at

our boarding-house in Old Compton Street agreeably stimulated by the

life and the overwhelming size of the great city. Although at the age

of twelve I had made what I supposed to be a translation of a monologue

from Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, I found my knowledge of English

quite inadequate when it came to conversing with the landlady of the

King’s Arms. But the good dame’s social condition as a sea-captain’s

widow led her to think she could talk French to me, and her attempts

made me wonder which of us knew least of that language. And then a most

disturbing incident occurred—we missed Robber, who must have run away

at the door instead of following us into the house. Our distress at

having lost our good dog after having brought him all the way there

with such difficulty occupied us exclusively during the first two hours

we spent in this new home on land. We kept constant watch at the window

until, of a sudden, we joyfully recognised Robber strolling

unconcernedly towards the house from a side street. Afterwards we

learned that our truant had wandered as far as Oxford Street in search

of adventures, and I have always considered his amazing return to a

house which he had not even entered as a strong proof of the absolute

certainty of the animal’s instincts in the matter of memory.

We now had time to realise the tiresome after-effects of the voyage.

The continuous swaying of the floor and our clumsy efforts to keep from

falling we found fairly entertaining; but when we came to take our

well-earned rest in the huge English double bed, and found that that

too rocked up and down, it became quite unbearable. Every time we

closed our eyes we sank into frightful abysses, and, springing up

again, cried out for help. It seemed as if that terrible voyage would

go on to the end of our lives. Added to this we felt miserably sick;

for, after the atrocious food on board, we had been only too ready to

partake, with less discretion than relish, of tastier fare.

We were so exhausted by all these trials that we forgot to consider

what was, after all, the vital question—the probable result in hard

cash. Indeed, the marvels of the great city proved so fascinating, that

we started off in a cab, for all the world as if we were on a pleasure

trip, to follow up a plan I had sketched on my map of London. In our

wonder and delight at what we saw, we quite forgot all we had gone

through. Costly as it proved, I considered our week’s stay justified in

view of Minna’s need of rest in the first place, and secondly, the

excellent opportunity it afforded me of making acquaintances in the

musical world. During my last visit to Dresden I had sent Rule

Britannia, the overture composed at Königsberg, to Sir John Smart,

president of the Philharmonic Society. It is true he had never

acknowledged it, but I felt it the more incumbent on me to bring him to

task about it. I therefore spent some days trying to find out where he

lived, wondering meanwhile in which language I should have to make

myself understood, but as the result of my inquiries I discovered that

Smart was not in London at all. I next persuaded myself that it would

be a good thing to look up Bulwer Lytton, and to come to an

understanding about the operatic performance of his novel, Rienzi,

which I had dramatised. Having been told, on the continent, that Bulwer

was a member of Parliament, I went to the House, after a few days, to

inquire on the spot. My total ignorance of the English language stood

me in good stead here, and I was treated with unexpected consideration;

for, as none of the lower officials in that vast building could make

out what I wanted, I was sent, step by step, to one high dignitary

after the other, until at last I was introduced to a

distinguished-looking man, who came out of a large hall as we passed,

as an entirely unintelligible individual. (Minna was with me all the

time; only Robber. had been left behind at the King’s Arms.) He asked

me very civilly what I wanted, in French, and seemed favourably

impressed when I inquired for the celebrated author. He was obliged to

tell me, however, that he was not in London. I went on to ask whether I

could not be admitted to a debate, but was told that, in consequence of

the old Houses of Parliament having been burnt down, they were using

temporary premises where the space was so limited that only a few

favoured visitors could procure cards of admittance. But on my pressing

more urgently he relented, and shortly after opened a door leading

direct into the strangers’ seats in the House of Lords. It seemed

reasonable to conclude from this that our friend was a lord in person.

I was immensely interested to see and hear the Premier, Lord Melbourne,

and Brougham (who seemed to me to take a very active part in the

proceedings, prompting Melbourne several times, as I thought), and the

Duke of Wellington, who looked so comfortable in his grey beaver hat,

with his hands diving deep into his trousers pockets, and who made his

speech in so conversational a tone that I lost my feeling of excessive

awe. He had a curious way, too, of accenting his points of special

emphasis by shaking his whole body, I was also much interested in Lord

Lyndhurst, Brougham’s particular enemy, and was amazed to see Brougham

go across several times to sit down coolly beside him, apparently with

a view to prompting even his opponent. The matter in hand was, as I

learned afterwards from the papers, the discussion of measures to be

taken against the Portuguese Government to ensure the passing of the

Anti-Slavery Bill. The Bishop of London, who was one of the speakers on

this occasion, was the only one of these gentlemen whose voice and

manner seemed to me stiff or unnatural, but possibly I was prejudiced

by my dislike of parsons generally.

After this pleasing adventure I imagined I had exhausted the

attractions of London for the present, for although I could not gain

admittance to the Lower House, my untiring friend, whom I came across

again as I went out, showed me the room where the Commons sat,

explained as much as was necessary, and gave me a sight of the

Speaker’s woolsack, and of his mace lying hidden under the table. He

also gave me such careful details of various things that I felt I knew

all there was to know about the capital of Great Britain. I had not the

smallest intention of going to the Italian opera, possibly because I

imagined the prices to be too ruinous. We thoroughly explored all the

principal streets, often tiring ourselves out; we shuddered through a

ghastly London Sunday, and wound up with a train trip (our very first)

to Gravesend Park, in the company of the captain of the Thetis. On the

20th of August we crossed over to France by steamer, arriving the same

evening at Boulogne-sur-mer, where we took leave of the sea with the

fervent desire never to go on it again.

We were both of us secretly convinced that we should meet with

disappointments in Paris, and it was partly on that account that we

decided to spend a few weeks at or near Boulogne. It was, in any case,

too early in the season to find the various important people whom I

proposed to see, in town; on the other hand, it seemed to me a most

fortunate circumstance that Meyerbeer should happen to be at Boulogne.

Also, I had the instrumentation of part of the second act of Rienzi to

finish, and was bent on having at least half of the work ready to show

on my arrival in the costly French capital. We therefore set out to

find less expensive accommodation in the country round Boulogne.

Beginning with the immediate neighbourhood, our search ended in our

taking two practically unfurnished rooms in the detached house of a

rural wine merchant’s, situated on the main road to Paris at half an

hour’s distance from Boulogne. We next provided scanty but adequate

furniture, and in bringing our wits to bear upon this matter Minna

particularly distinguished herself. Besides a bed and two chairs, we

dug up a table, which, after I had cleared away my Rienzi papers,

served for our meals, which we had to prepare at our own fireside.

While we were here I made my first call on Meyerbeer. I had often read

in the papers of his proverbial amiability, and bore him no ill-will

for not replying to my letter. My favourable opinion was soon to be

confirmed, however, by his kind reception of me. The impression he made

was good in every respect, particularly as regards his appearance. The

years had not yet given his features the flabby look which sooner or

later mars most Jewish faces, and the fine formation of his brow round

about the eyes gave him an expression of countenance that inspired

confidence. He did not seem in the least inclined to depreciate my

intention of trying my luck in Paris as a composer of opera; he allowed

me to read him my libretto for Rienzi, and really listened up to the

end of the third act. He kept the two acts that were complete, saying

that he wished to look them over, and assured me, when I again called

on him, of his whole-hearted interest in my work. Be this as it may, it

annoyed me somewhat that he should again and again fall back on

praising my minute handwriting, an accomplishment he considered

especially Saxonian. He promised to give me letters of recommendation

to Duponchel, the manager of the Opera House, and to Habeneck, the

conductor. I now felt that I had good cause to extol my good fortune

which, after many vicissitudes, had sent me precisely to this

particular spot in France. What better fortune could have befallen me

than to secure, in so short a time, the sympathetic interest of the

most famous composer of French opera! Meyerbeer took me to see

Moscheles, who was then in Boulogne, and also Fraulein Blahedka, a

celebrated virtuoso whose name I had known for many years. I spent a

few informal musical evenings at both houses, and thus came into close

touch with musical celebrities, an experience quite new to me.

I had written to my future brother-in-law, Avernarius, in Paris, to ask

him to find us suitable accommodations, and we started on our journey

thither on 16th September in the diligence, my efforts to hoist Robber

on to the top being attended by the usual difficulties.

My first impression of Paris proved disappointing in view of the great

expectations I had cherished of that city; after London it seemed to me

narrow and confined. I had imagined the famous boulevards to be much

vaster, for instance, and was really annoyed, when the huge coach put

us down in the Rue de la Juissienne, to think that I should first set

foot on Parisian soil in such a wretched little alley. Neither did the

Rue Richelieu, where my brother-in-law had his book-shop, seem imposing

after the streets in the west end of London. As for the chambre garnie,

which had been engaged for me in the Rue de la Tonnellerie, one of the

narrow side-streets which link the Rue St. Honore with the Marche des

Innocents, I felt positively degraded at having to take up my abode

there. I needed all the consolation that could be derived from an

inscription, placed under a bust of Moliere, which read: maison ou

naquit Moliere, to raise my courage after the mean impression the house

had first made upon me. The room, which had been prepared for us on the

fourth floor, was small but cheerful, decently furnished, and

inexpensive. From the windows we could see the frightful bustle in the

market below, which became more and more alarming as we watched it, and

I wondered what we were doing in such a quarter.

Shortly after this, Avenarius had to go to Leipzig to bring home his

bride, my youngest sister Cecilia, after the wedding in that city.

Before leaving, he gave me an introduction to his only musical

acquaintance, a German holding an appointment in the music department

of the Bibliotheque Royale, named E. G. Anders, who lost no time in

looking us up in Moliere’s house. He was, as I soon discovered, a man

of very unusual character, and, little as he was able to help me, he

left an affecting and ineffaceable impression on my memory. He was a

bachelor in the fifties, whose reverses had driven him to the sad

necessity of earning a living in Paris entirely without assistance. He

had fallen back on the extraordinary bibliographical knowledge which,

especially in reference to music, it had been his hobby to acquire in

the days of his prosperity. His real name he never told me, wishing to

guard the secret of that, as of his misfortunes, until after his death.

For the time being he told me only that he was known as Anders, was of

noble descent, and had held property on the Rhine, but that he had lost

everything owing to the villainous betrayal of his gullibility and

good-nature. The only thing he had managed to save was his very

considerable library, the size of which I was able to estimate for

myself. It filled every wall of his small dwelling. Even here in Paris

he soon complained of bitter enemies; for, in spite of having come

furnished with an introduction to influential people, he still held the

inferior position of an employee in the library. In spite of his long

service there and his great learning, he had to see really ignorant men

promoted over his head. I discovered afterwards that the real reason

lay in his unbusinesslike methods, and the effeminacy consequent on the

delicate way in which he had been nurtured in early life, which made

him incapable of developing the energy necessary for his work. On a

miserable pittance of fifteen hundred francs a year, he led a weary

existence, full of anxiety. With nothing in view but a lonely old age,

and the probability of dying in a hospital, it seemed as if our society

put new life into him; for though we were poverty-stricken, we looked

forward boldly and hopefully to the future. My vivacity and invincible

energy filled him with hopes of my success, and from this time forward

he took a most tender and unselfish part in furthering my interests.

Although he was a contributor to the Gazette Musicale, edited by Moritz

Schlesinger, he had never succeeded in making his influence felt there

in the slightest degree. He had none of the versatility of a

journalist, and the editors entrusted him with little besides the

preparation of bibliographical notes. Oddly enough, it was with this

unworldly and least resourceful of men that I had to discuss my plan

for the conquest of Paris, that is, of musical Paris, which is made up

of all the most questionable characters imaginable. The result was

practically always the same; we merely encouraged each other in the

hope that some unforeseen stroke of luck would help my cause.

To assist us in these discussions Anders called in his friend and

housemate Lehrs, a philologist, my acquaintance with whom was soon to

develop into one of the most beautiful friendships of my life. Lehrs

was the younger brother of a famous scholar at Königsberg. He had left

there to come to Paris some years before, with the object of gaining an

independent position by his philological work. This he preferred, in

spite of the attendant difficulties, to a post as teacher with a salary

which only in Germany could be considered sufficient for a scholar’s

wants. He soon obtained work from Didot, the bookseller, as assistant

editor of a large edition of Greek classics, but the editor traded on

his poverty, and was much more concerned about the success of his

enterprise than about the condition of his poor collaborator. Lehrs had

therefore perpetually to struggle against poverty, but he preserved an

even temper, and showed himself in every way a model of

disinterestedness and self-sacrifice. At first he looked upon me only

as a man in need of advice, and incidentally a fellow-sufferer in

Paris; for he had no knowledge of music, and had no particular interest

in it. We soon became so intimate that I had him dropping in nearly

every evening with Anders, Lehrs being extremely useful to his friend,

whose unsteadiness in walking obliged him to use an umbrella and a

walking-stick as crutches. He was also nervous in crossing crowded

thorough-fares, and particularly so at night; while he always liked to

make Lehrs cross my threshold in front of him to distract the attention

of Robber, of whom he stood in obvious terror. Our usually good-natured

dog became positively suspicious of this visitor, and soon adopted

towards him the same aggressive attitude which he had shown to the

sailor Koske on board the Thetis. The two men lived at an hotel garni

in Rue de Seine. They complained greatly of their landlady, who

appropriated so much of their income that they were entirely in her

power. Anders had for years been trying to assert his independence by

leaving her, without being able to carry out his plan. We soon threw

off mutually every shred of disguise as to the present state of our

finances, so that, although the two house-holds were actually

separated, our common troubles gave us all the intimacy of one united

family.

The various ways by which I might obtain recognition in Paris formed

the chief topic of our discussions at that time. Our hopes were at

first centred on Meyerbeer’s promised letters of introduction.

Duponchel, the director of the Opera, did actually see me at his

office, where, fixing a monocle in his right eye, he read through

Meyerbeer’s letter without betraying the least emotion, having no doubt

opened similar communications from the composer many times before. I

went away, and never heard another word from him. The elderly

conductor, Habeneck, on the other hand, took an interest in my work

that was not merely polite, and acceded to my request to have something

of mine played at one of the orchestral practises at the Conservatoire

as soon as he should have leisure. I had, unfortunately, no short

instrumental piece that seemed suitable except my queer Columbus

Overture, which I considered the most effective of all that had

emanated from my pen. It had been received with great applause on the

occasion of its performance in the theatre at Magdeburg, with the

assistance of the valiant trumpeters from the Prussian garrison. I gave

Habeneck the score and parts, and was able to report to our committee

at home that I had now one enterprise on foot.

I gave up the attempt to try and see Scribe on the mere ground of our

having had some correspondence, for my friends had made it clear to me,

in the light of their own experience, that it was out of the question

to expect this exceptionally busy author to occupy himself seriously

with a young and unknown musician. Anders was able to introduce me to

another acquaintance, however, a certain M. Dumersan. This grey-haired

gentleman had written some hundred vaudeville pieces, and would have

been glad to see one of them performed as an opera on a larger scale

before his death. He had no idea of standing on his dignity as an

author, and was quite willing to undertake the translation of an

existing libretto into French verse. We therefore entrusted him with

the writing of my Liebesverbot, with a view to a performance at the

Theatre de la Renaissance, as it was then called. (It was the third

existing theatre for lyric drama, the performances being given in the

new Salle Ventadour, which had been rebuilt after its destruction by

fire.) On the understanding that it was to be a literal translation, he

at once turned the three numbers of my opera, for which I hoped to

secure a hearing, into neat French verse. Besides this, he asked me to

compose a chorus for a vaudeville entitled La Descente de la Courtille,

which was to be played at the Varietes during the carnival.

This was a second opening. My friends now strongly advised me to write

something small in the way of songs, which I could offer to popular

singers for concert purposes. Both Lehrs and Anders produced words for

these. Anders brought a very innocent Dors, mon enfant, written by a

young poet of his acquaintance; this was the first thing I composed to

a French text. It was so successful that, when I had tried it over

softly several times on the piano, my wife, who was in bed, called out

to me that it was heavenly for sending one to sleep. I also set

L’Attente from Hugo’s Orientales, and Ronsard’s song, Mignonne, to

music. I have no reason to be ashamed of these small pieces, which I

published subsequently as a musical supplement to Europa (Lewald’s

publication) in 1841.

I next stumbled on the idea of writing a grand bass aria with a chorus,

for Lablache to introduce into his part of Orovist in Bellini’s Norma.

Lehrs had to hunt up an Italian political refugee to get the text out

of him. This was done, and I produced an effective composition a la

Bellini (which still exists among my manuscripts), and went off at once

to offer it to Lablache.

The friendly Moor, who received me in the great singer’s anteroom,

insisted upon admitting me straight into his master’s presence without

announcing me. As I had anticipated some difficulty in getting near

such a celebrity, I had written my request, as I thought this would be

simpler than explaining verbally.

The black servant’s pleasant manner made me feel very uncomfortable; I

entrusted my score and letter to him to give to Lablache, without

taking any notice of his kindly astonishment at my refusal of his

repeated invitation to go into his master’s room and have an interview,

and I left the house hurriedly, intending to call for my answer in a

few days. When I came back Lablache received me most kindly, and

assured me that my aria was excellent, though it was impossible to

introduce it into Bellini’s opera after the latter had already been

performed so very often. My relapse into the domain of Bellini’s style,

of which I had been guilty through the writing of this aria, was

therefore useless to me, and I soon became convinced of the

fruitlessness of my efforts in that direction. I saw that I should need

personal introductions to various singers in order to ensure the

production of one of my other compositions.

When Meyerbeer at last arrived in Paris, therefore, I was delighted. He

was not in the least astonished at the lack of success of his letters

of introduction; on the contrary, he made use of this opportunity to

impress upon me how difficult it was to get on in Paris, and how

necessary it was for me to look out for less pretentious work. With

this object he introduced me to Maurice Schlesinger, and leaving me at

the mercy of that monstrous person, went back to Germany.

At first Schlesinger did not know what to do with me; the acquaintances

I made through him (of whom the chief was the violinist Panofka) led to

nothing, and I therefore returned to my advisory board at home, through

whose influence I had recently received an order to compose the music

to the Two Grenadiers, by Heine, translated by a Parisian professor. I

wrote this song for baritone, and was very pleased with the result; on

Ander’s advice I now tried to find singers for my new compositions.

Mme. Pauline Viardot, on whom I first called, went through my songs

with me. She was very amiable, and praised them, but did not see why

SHE should sing them. I went through the same experience with a Mme.

Widmann, a grand contralto, who sang my Dors, mon enfant with great

feeling; all the same she had no further use for my composition. A

certain M. Dupont, third tenor at the grand opera, tried my setting of

the Ronsard poem, but declared that the language in which it was

written was no longer palatable to the Paris public. M. Geraldy, a

favourite concert singer and teacher, who allowed me to call and see

him frequently, told me that the Two Grenadiers was impossible, for the

simple reason that the accompaniment at the end of the song, which I

had modelled upon the Marseillaise, could only be sung in the streets

of Paris to the accompaniment of cannons and gunshots. Habeneck was the

only person who fulfilled his promise to conduct my Columbus Overture

at one of the rehearsals for the benefit of Anders and myself. As,

however, there was no question of producing this work even at one of

the celebrated Conservatoire concerts, I saw clearly that the old

gentleman was only moved by kindness and a desire to encourage me. It

could not lead to anything further, and I myself was convinced that

this extremely superficial work of my young days could only give the

orchestra a wrong impression of my talents. However, these rehearsals,

to my surprise, made such an unexpected impression on me in other ways

that they exercised a decisive influence in the crisis of my artistic

development. This was due to the fact that I listened repeatedly to

Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, which, by dint of untiring practice,

received such a marvellous interpretation at the hands of this

celebrated orchestra, that the picture I had had of it in my mind in

the enthusiastic days of my youth now stood before me almost tangibly

in brilliant colours, undimmed, as though it had never been effaced by

the Leipzig orchestra who had slaughtered it under Pohlenz’s baton.

Where formerly I had only seen mystic constellations and weird shapes

without meaning, I now found, flowing from innumerable sources, a

stream of the most touching and heavenly melodies which delighted my

heart.

The whole of that period of the deterioration of my musical tastes

which dated, practically speaking, from those selfsame confusing ideas

about Beethoven, and which had grown so much worse through my

acquaintance with that dreadful theatre—all these wrong views now sank

down as if into an abyss of shame and remorse.

This inner change had been gradually prepared by many painful

experiences during the last few years. I owed the recovery of my old

vigour and spirits to the deep impression the rendering of the Ninth

Symphony had made on me when performed in a way I had never dreamed of.

This important event in my life can only be compared to the upheaval

caused within me when, as a youth of sixteen, I saw Schroder-Devrient

act in Fidelio.

The direct result of this was my intense longing to compose something

that would give me a similar feeling of satisfaction, and this desire

grew in proportion to my anxiety about my unfortunate position in

Paris, which made me almost despair of success.

In this mood I sketched an overture to Faust which, according to my

original scheme, was only to form the first part of a whole Faust

Symphony, as I had already got the ‘Gretchen’ idea in my head for the

second movement. This is the same composition that I rewrote in several

parts fifteen years later; I had forgotten all about it, and I owed its

reconstruction to the advice of Liszt, who gave me many valuable hints.

This composition has been performed many times under the title of eine

Faust-ouverture, and has met with great appreciation. At the time of

which I am speaking, I hoped that the Conservatoire orchestra would

have been willing to give the work a hearing, but I was told they

thought they had done enough for me, and hoped to be rid of me for some

time.

Having failed everywhere, I now turned to Meyerbeer for more

introductions, especially to singers. I was very much surprised when,

in consequence of my request, Meyerbeer introduced me to a certain M.

Gouin, a post-office official, and Meyerbeer’s sole agent in Paris,

whom he instructed to do his utmost for me. Meyerbeer specially wished

me to know M. Antenor Joly, director of the Theatre de la Renaissance,

the musical theatre already mentioned. M. Gouin, with almost suspicious

levity, promised me to produce my opera Liebesverbot, which now only

required translation. There was a question of having a few numbers of

my opera sung to the committee of the theatre at a special audience.

When I suggested that some of the singers of this very theatre should

undertake to sing three of the numbers which had been already

translated by Dumersan, I was refused on the plea that all these

artists were far too busy. But Gouin saw a way out of the difficulty;

on the authority of Maître Meyerbeer, he won over to our cause several

singers who were under an obligation to Meyerbeer: Mme. Dorus-Gras, a

real primadonna of the Grand Opera, Mme. Widmann and M. Dupont (the two

last-named had previously refused to help me) now promised to sing for

me at this audience.

This much, then, did I achieve in six months. It was now nearly Easter

of the year 1840. Encouraged by Gouin’s negotiations, which seemed to

spell hope, I made up my mind to move from the obscure Quartier des

Innocents to a part of Paris nearer to the musical centre; and in this

I was encouraged by Lehrs’ foolhardy advice.

What this change meant to me, my readers will learn when they hear

under what circumstances we had dragged on our existence during our

stay in Paris.

Although we were living in the cheapest possible way, dining at a very

small restaurant for a franc a head, it was impossible to prevent the

rest of our money from melting away. Our friend Möller had given us to

understand that we could ask him if we were in need, as he would put

aside for us the first money that came in from any successful business

transaction. There was no alternative but to apply to him for money; in

the meantime we pawned all the trinkets we possessed that were of any

value. As I was too shy to make inquiries about a pawnshop, I looked up

the French equivalent in the dictionary in order to be able to

recognise such a place when I saw it. In my little pocket dictionary I

could not find any other word than ‘Lombard.’ On looking at a map of

Paris I found, situated in the middle of an inextricable maze of

streets, a very small lane called Rue des Lombards. Thither I wended my

way, but my expedition was fruitless. Often, on reading by the light of

the transparent lanterns the inscription ‘Mont de Piété,’ I became very

curious to know its meaning, and on consulting my advisory board at

home about this ‘Mount of Piety,’[9] I was told, to my great

delight, that it was precisely there that I should find salvation. To

this ‘Mont de Piété’ we now carried all we possessed in the way of

silver, namely, our wedding presents. After that followed my wife’s

trinkets and the rest of her former theatrical wardrobe, amongst which

was a beautiful silver-embroidered blue dress with a court train, once

the property of the Duchess of Dessau. Still we heard nothing from our

friend Möller, and we were obliged to wait on from day to day for the

sorely needed help from Königsberg, and at last, one dark day, we

pledged our wedding rings. When all hope of assistance seemed vain, I

heard that the pawn-tickets themselves were of some value, as they

could be sold to buyers, who thereby acquired the right to redeem the

pawned articles. I had to resort even to this, and thus the blue

court-dress, for instance, was lost for ever. Möller never wrote again.

When later on he called on me at the time of my conductorship in

Dresden, he admitted that he had been embittered against me owing to

humiliating and derogatory remarks we were said to have made about him

after we parted, and had resolved not to have anything further to do

with us. We were certain of our innocence in the matter, and very

grieved at having, through pure slander, lost the chance of such

assistance in our great need.

[9] This is the correct translation of the words _Berg der

Frömmigkeit_ used in the original.—Editor.

At the beginning of our pecuniary difficulties we sustained a loss

which we looked upon as providential, in spite of the grief it caused

us. This was our beautiful dog, which we had managed to bring across to

Paris with endless difficulty. As he was a very valuable animal, and

attracted much attention, he had probably been stolen. In spite of the

terrible state of the traffic in Paris, he had always found his way

home in the same clever manner in which he had mastered the

difficulties of the London streets. Quite at the beginning of our stay

in Paris he had often gone off by himself to the gardens of the Palais

Royal, where he used to meet many of his friends, and had returned safe

and sound after a brilliant exhibition of swimming and retrieving

before an audience of gutter children. At the Quai du Pont-neuf he

generally begged us to let him bathe; there he used to draw a large

crowd of spectators round him, who were so loud in their enthusiasm

about the way in which he dived for and brought to land various objects

of clothing, tools, etc., that the police begged us to put an end to

the obstruction. One morning I let him out for a little run as usual;

he never returned, and in spite of our most strenuous efforts to

recover him, no trace of him was to be found. This loss seemed to many

of our friends a piece of luck, for they could not understand how it

was possible for us to feed such a huge animal when we ourselves had

not enough to eat. About this time, the second month of our stay in

Paris, my sister Louisa came over from Leipzig to join her husband,

Friedrich Brockhaus, in Paris, where he had been waiting for her for

some time. They intended to go to Italy together, and Louisa made use

of this opportunity to buy all kinds of expensive things in Paris. I

did not expect them to feel any pity for us on account of our foolish

removal to Paris, and its attendant miseries, or that they should

consider themselves bound to help us in any way; but although we did

not try to conceal our position, we derived no benefit from the visit

of our rich relations. Minna was even kind enough to help my sister

with her luxurious shopping, and we were very anxious not to make them

think we wanted to rouse their pity. In return my sister introduced me

to an extraordinary friend of hers, who was destined to take a great

interest in me. This was the young painter, Ernst Kietz, from Dresden;

he was an exceptionally kind-hearted and unaffected young man, whose

talent for portrait painting (in a sort of coloured pastel style) had

made him such a favourite in his own town, that he had been induced by

his financial successes to come to Paris for a time to finish his art

studies. He had now been working in Delaroche’s studio for about a

year. He had a curious and almost childlike disposition, and his lack

of all serious education, combined with a certain weakness of

character, had made him choose a career in which he was destined, in

spite of all his talent, to fail hopelessly. I had every opportunity of

recognising this, as I saw a great deal of him. At the time, however,

the simple-hearted devotion and kindness of this young man were very

welcome both to myself and my wife, who often felt lonely, and his

friendship was a real source of help in our darkest hours of adversity.

He became almost a member of the family, and joined our home circle

every night, providing a strange contrast to nervous old Anders and the

grave-faced Lehrs. His good-nature and his quaint remarks soon made him

indispensable to us; he amused us tremendously with his French, into

which he would launch with the greatest confidence, although he could

not put together two consecutive sentences properly, in spite of having

lived in Paris for twenty years. With Delaroche he studied

oil-painting, and had obviously considerable talent in this direction,

although it was the very rock on which he stranded. The mixing of the

colours on his palette, and especially the cleaning of his brushes,

took up so much of his time that he rarely came to the actual painting.

As the days were very short in midwinter, he never had time to do any

work after he had finished washing his palette and brushes, and, as far

as I can remember, he never completed a single portrait. Strangers to

whom he had been introduced, and who had given him orders to paint

their portraits, were obliged to leave Paris without seeing them even

half done, and at last he even complained because some of his sitters

died before their portraits were completed. His landlord, to whom he

was always in debt for rent, was the only creature who succeeded in

getting a portrait of his ugly person from the painter, and, as far as

I know, this is the only finished portrait in existence by Kietz. On

the other hand, he was very clever at making little sketches of any

subject suggested by our conversation during the evening, and in these

he displayed both originality and delicacy of execution. During the

winter of that year he completed a good pencil portrait of me, which he

touched up two years afterwards when he knew me more intimately,

finishing it off as it now stands. It pleased him to sketch me in the

attitude I often assumed during our evening chats when I was in a

cheerful mood. No evening ever passed during which I did not succeed in

shaking off the depression caused by my vain endeavours, and by the

many worries I had gone through during the day, and in regaining my

natural cheerfulness, and Kietz was anxious to represent me to the

world as a man who, in spite of the hard times he had to face, had

confidence in his success, and rose smiling above the troubles of life.

Before the end of the year 1839, my youngest sister Cecilia also

arrived in Paris with her husband, Edward Avenarius. It was only

natural that she should feel embarrassed at the idea of meeting us in

Paris in our extremely straitened circumstances, especially as her

husband was not very well off. Consequently, instead of calling on them

frequently, we preferred waiting until they came to see us, which, by

the way, took them a long time. On the other hand, the renewal of our

acquaintance with Heinrich Laube, who came over to Paris at the

beginning of 1840 with his young wife, Iduna (nee Budaus), was very

cheering. She was the widow of a wealthy Leipzig doctor, and Laube had

married her under very extraordinary circumstances, since we last saw

him in Berlin; they intended to enjoy themselves for a few months in

Paris. During the long period of his detention, while awaiting his

trial, this young lady had been so touched by his misfortunes that

without knowing much of him, she had shown great sympathy and interest

in his case. Laube’s sentence was pronounced soon after I left Berlin;

it was unexpectedly light, consisting of only one year’s imprisonment

in the town gaol. He was allowed to undergo this term in the prison at

Muskau in Silesia, where he had the advantage of being near his friend,

Prince Puckler, who in his official capacity, and on account of his

influence with the governor of the prison, was permitted to afford the

prisoner even the consolation of personal intercourse.

The young widow resolved to marry him at the beginning of his term of

imprisonment, so that she might be near him at Muskau with her loving

assistance. To see my old friend under such favourable conditions was

in itself a pleasure to me; I also experienced the liveliest

satisfaction at finding there was no change in his former sympathetic

attitude. We met frequently; our wives also became friends, and Laube

was the first to approve in his kindly humorous way of our folly in

moving to Paris.

In his house I made the acquaintance of Heinrich Heine, and both of

them joked good-humouredly over my extraordinary position, making even

me laugh. Laube felt himself compelled to talk seriously to me about my

expectations of succeeding in Paris, as he saw that I treated my

situation, based on such trivial hopes, with a humour that charmed him

even against his better judgment. He tried to think how he could help

me without prejudicing my future. With this object he wanted me to make

a more or less plausible sketch of my future plans, so that on his

approaching visit to our native land he might procure some help for me.

I happened just at that time to have come to an exceedingly promising

understanding with the management of the Theatre de la Renaissance. I

thus seemed to have obtained a footing, and I thought it safe to

assert, that if I were guaranteed the means of livelihood for six

months, I could not fail within that period to accomplish something.

Laube promised to make this provision, and kept his word. He induced

one of his wealthy friends in Leipzig, and, following this example, my

well-to-do relations, to provide me for six months with the necessary

resources, to be paid in monthly instalments through Avenarius.

We therefore decided, as I have said, to leave our furnished apartments

and take a flat for ourselves in the Rue du Helder. My prudent, careful

wife had suffered greatly on account of the careless and uncertain

manner in which I had hitherto controlled our meagre resources, and in

now undertaking the responsibility, she explained that she understood

how to keep house more cheaply than we could do by living in furnished

rooms and restaurants. Success justified the step; the serious part of

the question lay in the fact that we had to start housekeeping without

any furniture of our own, and everything necessary for domestic

purposes had to be procured, though we had not the wherewithal to get

it. In this matter Lehrs, who was well versed in the peculiarities of

Parisian life, was able to advise us. In his opinion the only

compensation for the experiences we had undergone hitherto would be a

success equivalent to my daring. As I did not possess the resources to

allow of long years of patient waiting for success in Paris, I must

either count on extraordinary luck or renounce all my hopes forthwith.

The longed-for success must come within a year, or I should be ruined.

Therefore I must dare all, as befitted my name, for in my case he was

not inclined to derive ‘Wagner’[10] from Fuhrwerk. I was to pay my

rent, twelve hundred francs, in quarterly instalments; for the

furniture and fittings, he recommended me, through his landlady, to a

carpenter who provided everything that was necessary for what seemed to

be a reasonable sum, also to be paid by instalments, all of which

appeared very simple. Lehrs maintained that I should do no good in

Paris unless I showed the world that I had confidence in myself. My

trial audience was impending; I felt sure of the Theatre de la

Renaissance, and Dumersan was keenly anxious to make a complete

translation of my Liebesverbot into French. So we decided to run the

risk. On 15th April, to the astonishment of the concierge of the house

in the Rue du Helder, we moved with an exceedingly small amount of

luggage into our comfortable new apartments.

[10] ‘Wagner’ in German means one who dares, also a Wagoner; and

‘Fuhrwerk’ means a carriage.—Editor.

The very first visit I received in the rooms I had taken with such high

hopes was from Anders, who came with the tidings that the Theatre de la

Renaissance had just gone bankrupt, and was closed. This news, which

came on me like a thunder-clap, seemed to portend more than an ordinary

stroke of bad luck; it revealed to me like a flash of lightning the

absolute emptiness of my prospects. My friends openly expressed the

opinion that Meyerbeer, in sending me from the Grand Opera to this

theatre, probably knew the whole of the circumstances. I did not pursue

the line of thought to which this supposition might lead, as I felt

cause enough for bitterness when I wondered what I should do with the

rooms in which I was so nicely installed.

As my singers had now practised the portions of Liebesverbot intended

for the trial audience, I was anxious at least to have them performed

before some persons of influence. M. Edouard Monnaie, who had been

appointed temporary director of the Grand Opera after Duponchel’s

retirement, was the less disposed to refuse as the singers who were to

take part belonged to the institution over which he presided; moreover,

there was no obligation attached to his presence at the audience. I

also took the trouble to call on Scribe to invite him to attend, and he

accepted with the kindest alacrity. At last my three pieces were

performed before these two gentlemen in the green room of the Grand

Opera, and I played the piano accompaniment. They pronounced the music

charming, and Scribe expressed his willingness to arrange the libretto

for me as soon as the managers of the opera had decided on accepting

the piece; all that M. Monnaie had to reply to this offer was that it

was impossible for them to do so at present. I did not fail to realise

that these were only polite expressions; but at all events I thought it

very nice of them, and particularly condescending of Scribe to have got

so far as to think me deserving of a little politeness.

But in my heart of hearts I felt really ashamed of having gone back

again seriously to that superficial early work from which I had taken

these three pieces. Of course I had only done this because I thought I

should win success more rapidly in Paris by adapting myself to its

frivolous taste. My aversion from this kind of taste, which had been

long growing, coincided with my abandonment of all hopes of success in

Paris. I was placed in an exceedingly melancholy situation by the fact

that my circumstances had so shaped themselves that I dared not express

this important change in my feelings to any one, especially to my poor

wife. But if I continued to make the best of a bad bargain, I had no

longer any illusions as to the possibility of success in Paris. Face to

face with unheard-of misery, I shuddered at the smiling aspect which

Paris presented in the bright sunshine of May. It was the beginning of

the slack season for any sort of artistic enterprise in Paris, and from

every door at which I knocked with feigned hope I was turned away with

the wretchedly monotonous phrase, Monsieur est a la campagne.

On our long walks, when we felt ourselves absolute strangers in the

midst of the gay throng, I used to romance to my wife about the South

American Free States, far away from all this sinister life, where opera

and music were unknown, and the foundations of a sensible livelihood

could easily be secured by industry. I told Minna, who was quite in the

dark as to my meaning, of a book I had just read, Zschokke’s Die

Gründung von Maryland, in which I found a very seductive account of the

sensation of relief experienced by the European settlers after their

former sufferings and persecutions. She, being of a more practical turn

of mind, used to point out to me the necessity of procuring means for

our continued existence in Paris, for which she had thought out all

sorts of economies.

I, for my part, was sketching out the plan of the poem of my Fliegender

Holländer, which I kept steadily before me as a possible means of

making a debut in Paris. I put together the material for a single act,

influenced by the consideration that I could in this way confine it to

the simple dramatic developments between the principal characters,

without troubling about the tiresome operatic accessories. From a

practical point of view, I thought I could rely on a better prospect

for the acceptance of my proposed work if it were cast in the form of a

one-act opera, such as was frequently given as a curtain raiser before

a ballet at the Grand Opera. I wrote about it to Meyerbeer in Berlin,

asking for his help. I also resumed the composition of Rienzi, to the

completion of which I was now giving my constant attention.

In the meantime our position became more and more gloomy; I was soon

compelled to draw in advance on the subsidies obtained by Laube, but in

so doing I gradually alienated the sympathy of my brother-in-law

Avenarius, to whom our stay in Paris was incomprehensible.

One morning, when we had been anxiously consulting as to the

possibility of raising our first quarter’s rent, a carrier appeared

with a parcel addressed to me from London; I thought it was an

intervention of Providence, and broke open the seal. At the same moment

a receipt-book was thrust into my face for signature, in which I at

once saw that I had to pay seven francs for carriage. I recognised,

moreover, that the parcel contained my overture Rule Britannia,

returned to me from the London Philharmonic Society. In my fury I told

the bearer that I would not take in the parcel, whereupon he

remonstrated in the liveliest fashion, as I had already opened it. It

was no use; I did not possess seven francs, and I told him he should

have presented the bill for the carriage before I had opened the

parcel. So I made him return the only copy of my overture to Messrs.

Laffitte and Gaillard’s firm, to do what they liked with it, and I

never cared to inquire what became of that manuscript.

Suddenly Kietz devised a way out of these troubles. He had been

commissioned by an old lady of Leipzig, called Fraulein Leplay, a rich

and very miserly old maid, to find a cheap lodging in Paris for her and

for his stepmother, with whom she intended to travel. As our apartment,

though not spacious, was larger than we actually needed, and had very

quickly become a troublesome burden to us, we did not hesitate for a

moment to let the larger portion of it to her for the time of her stay

in Paris, which was to last about two months. In addition, my wife

provided the guests with breakfast, as though they were in furnished

apartments, and took a great pride in looking at the few pence she

earned in this way. Although we found this amazing example of

old-maidishness trying enough, the arrangement we had made helped us in

some degree to tide over the anxious time, and I was able, in spite of

this disorganisation of our household arrangements, to continue working

in comparative peace at my Rienzi.

This became more difficult after Fraulein Leplay’s departure, when we

let one of our rooms to a German commercial traveller, who in his

leisure hours zealously played the flute. His name was Brix; he was a

modest, decent fellow, and had been recommended to us by Pecht the

painter, whose acquaintance we had recently made. He had been

introduced to us by Kietz, who studied with him in Delaroche’s studio.

He was the very antithesis of Kietz in every way, and obviously endowed

with less talent, yet he grappled with the task of acquiring the art of

oil-painting in the shortest possible time under difficult

circumstances with an industry and earnestness quite out of the common.

He was, moreover, well educated, and eagerly assimilated information,

and was very straightforward, earnest, and trustworthy. Without

attaining to the same degree of intimacy with us as our three older

friends, he was, nevertheless, one of the few who continued to stand by

us in our troubles, and habitually spent nearly every evening in our

company.

One day I received a fresh surprising proof of Laube’s continued

solicitude on our behalf. The secretary of a certain Count Kuscelew

called on us, and after some inquiry into our affairs, the state of

which he had heard from Laube at Karlsbad, informed us in a brief and

friendly way that his patron wished to be of use to us, and with that

object in view desired to make my acquaintance. In fact, he proposed to

engage a small light opera company in Paris, which was to follow him to

his Russian estates. He was therefore looking for a musical director of

sufficient experience to assist in recruiting the members in Paris. I

gladly went to the hotel where the count was staying, and there found

an elderly gentleman of frank and agreeable bearing, who willingly

listened to my little French compositions. Being a shrewd reader of

human nature, he saw at a glance that I was not the man for him, and

though he showed me the most polite attention, he went no further into

the opera scheme. But that very day he sent me, accompanied by a

friendly note, ten golden napoleons, in payment for my services. What

these services were I did not know. I thereupon wrote to him, and asked

for more precise details of his wishes, and begged him to commission a

composition, the fee for which I presumed he had sent in advance. As I

received no reply, I made more than one effort to approach him again,

but in vain. From other sources I afterwards learned that the only kind

of opera Count Kuscelew recognised was Adam’s. As for the operatic

company to be engaged to suit his taste, what he really wanted was more

a small harem than a company of artists.

So far I had not been able to arrange anything with the music publisher

Schlesinger. It was impossible to persuade him to publish my little

French songs. In order to do something, however, towards making myself

known in this direction, I decided to have my Two Grenadiers engraved

by him at my own expense. Kietz was to lithograph a magnificent

title-page for it. Schlesinger ended by charging me fifty francs for

the cost of production. The story of this publication is curious from

beginning to end; the work bore Schlesinger’s name, and as I had

defrayed all expenses, the proceeds were, of course, to be placed to my

account. I had afterwards to take the publisher’s word for it that not

a single copy had been sold. Subsequently, when I had made a quick

reputation for myself in Dresden through my Rienzi, Schott the

publisher in Mainz, who dealt almost exclusively in works translated

from the French, thought it advisable to bring out a German edition of

the Two Grenadiers. Below the text of the French translation he had the

German original by Heine printed; but as the French poem was a very

free paraphrase, in quite a different metre to the original, Heine’s

words fitted my composition so badly that I was furious at the insult

to my work, and thought it necessary to protest against Schott’s

publication as an entirely unauthorised reprint. Schott then threatened

me with an action for libel, as he said that, according to his

agreement, his edition was not a reprint (Nachdruck), but a

reimpression (Abdruck). In order to be spared further annoyance, I was

induced to send him an apology in deference to the distinction he had

drawn, which I did not understand.

In 1848, when I made inquiries of Schlesinger’s successor in Paris (M.

Brandus) as to the fate of my little work, I learned from him that a

new edition had been published, but he declined to entertain any

question of rights on my part. Since I did not care to buy a copy with

my own money, I have to this day had to do without my own property. To

what extent, in later years, others profited by similar transactions

relating to the publication of my works, will appear in due course.

For the moment the point was to compensate Schlesinger for the fifty

francs agreed upon, and he proposed that I should do this by writing

articles for his Gazette Musicale.

As I was not expert enough in the French language for literary

purposes, my article had to be translated and half the fee had to go to

the translator. However, I consoled myself by thinking I should still

receive sixty francs per sheet for the work. I was soon to learn, when

I presented myself to the angry publisher for payment, what was meant

by a sheet. It was measured by an abominable iron instrument, on which

the lines of the columns were marked off with figures; this was applied

to the article, and after careful subtraction of the spaces left for

the title and signature, the lines were added up. After this process

had been gone through, it appeared that what I had taken for a sheet

was only half a sheet.

So far so good. I began to write articles for Schlesinger’s wonderful

paper. The first was a long essay, De la musique allemande, in which I

expressed with the enthusiastic exaggeration characteristic of me at

that time my appreciation of the sincerity and earnestness of German

music. This article led my friend Anders to remark that the state of

affairs in Germany must, indeed, be splendid if the conditions were

really as I described. I enjoyed what was to me the surprising

satisfaction of seeing this article subsequently reproduced in Italian,

in a Milan musical journal, where, to my amusement, I saw myself

described as Dottissimo Musico Tedesco, a mistake which nowadays would

be impossible. My essay attracted favourable comment, and Schlesinger

asked me to write an article in praise of the arrangement made by the

Russian General Lwoff of Pergolesi’s Stabat Mater, which I did as

superficially as possible. On my own impulse I then wrote an essay in a

still more amiable vein called Du metier du virtuose et de

l’independance de la composition.

In the meantime I was surprised in the middle of the summer by the

arrival of Meyerbeer, who happened to come to Paris for a fortnight. He

was very sympathetic and obliging. When I told him my idea of writing a

one-act opera as a curtain raiser, and asked him to give me an

introduction to M. Leon Pillet, the recently appointed manager of the

Grand Opera, he at once took me to see him, and presented me to him.

But alas, I had the unpleasant surprise of learning from the serious

conversation which took place between those two gentlemen as to my

future, that Meyerbeer thought I had better decide to compose an act

for the ballet in collaboration with another musician. Of course I

could not entertain such an idea for a moment. I succeeded, however, in

handing over to M. Pillet my brief sketch of the subject of the Flying

Dutchman..

Things had reached this point when Meyerbeer again left Paris, this

time for a longer period of absence.

As I did not hear from M. Pillet for quite a long time, I now began to

work diligently at my composition of Rienzi, though, to my great

distress, I had often to interrupt this task in order to undertake

certain pot-boiling hack-work for Schlesinger.

As my contributions to the Gazette Musicale proved so unremunerative,

Schlesinger one day ordered me to work out a method for the Cornet a

pistons. When I told him about my embarrassment, in not knowing how to

deal with the subject, he replied by sending me five different

published ‘Methods’ for the Cornet a pistons, at that time the

favourite amateur instrument among the younger male population of

Paris. I had merely to devise a new sixth method out of these five, as

all Schlesinger wanted was to publish an edition of his own. I was

racking my brains how to start, when Schlesinger, who had just obtained

a new complete method, released me from the onerous task. I was,

however, told to write fourteen ‘Suites’ for the Cornet a pistons—that

is to say, airs out of operas arranged for this instrument. To furnish

me with material for this work, Schlesinger sent me no less than sixty

complete operas arranged for the piano. I looked them through for

suitable airs for my ‘Suites,’ marked the pages in the volumes with

paper strips, and arranged them into a curious-looking structure round

my work-table, so that I might have the greatest possible variety of

the melodious material within my reach. When I was in the midst of this

work, however, to my great relief and to my poor wife’s consternation,

Schlesinger told me that M. Schlitz, the first cornet player in Paris,

who had looked my ‘Etudes’ through, preparatory to their being

engraved, had declared that I knew absolutely nothing about the

instrument, and had generally adopted keys that were too high, which

Parisians would never be able to use. The part of the work I had

already done was, however, accepted, Schlitz having agreed to correct

it, but on condition that I should share my fee with him. The remainder

of the work was then taken off my hands, and the sixty pianoforte

arrangements went back to the curious shop in the Rue Richelieu.

So my exchequer was again in a sorry plight. The distressing poverty of

my home grew more apparent every day, and yet I was now free to give a

last touch to Rienzi, and by the 19th of November I had completed this

most voluminous of all my operas. I had decided, some time previously,

to offer the first production of this work to the Court Theatre at

Dresden, so that, in the event of its being a success, I might thus

resume my connection with Germany. I had decided upon Dresden as I knew

that there I should have in Tichatschek the most suitable tenor for the

leading part. I also reckoned on my acquaintance with

Schroder-Devrient, who had always been nice to me and who, though her

efforts were ineffectual, had been at great pains, out of regard for my

family, to get my Feen introduced at the Court Theatre, Dresden. In the

secretary of the theatre, Hofrat Winkler (known as Theodor Hell), I

also had an old friend of my family, besides which I had been

introduced to the conductor, Reissiger, with whom I and my friend Apel

had spent a pleasant evening on the occasion of our excursion to

Bohemia in earlier days. To all these people I now addressed most

respectful and eloquent appeals, wrote out an official note to the

director, Herr von Lüttichau, as well as a formal petition to the King

of Saxony, and had everything ready to send off.

Meantime, I had not omitted to indicate the exact tempi in my opera by

means of a metronome. As I did not possess such a thing, I had to

borrow one, and one morning I went out to restore the instrument to its

owner, carrying it under my thin overcoat. The day when this occurred

was one of the strangest in my life, as it showed in a really horrible

way the whole misery of my position at that time. In addition to the

fact that I did not know where to look for the few francs wherewith

Minna was to provide for our scanty household requirements, some of the

bills which, in accordance with the custom in Paris in those days, I

had signed for the purpose of fitting up our apartments, had fallen

due. Hoping to get help from one source or another, I first tried to

get those bills prolonged by the holders. As such documents pass

through many hands, I had to call on all the holders across the length

and breadth of the city. That day I was to propitiate a cheese-monger

who occupied a fifth-floor apartment in the Cite. I also intended to

ask for help from Heinrich, the brother of my brother-in-law,

Brockhaus, as he was then in Paris; and I was going to call at

Schlesinger’s to raise the money to pay for the despatch of my score

that day by the usual mail service.

As I had also to deliver the metronome, I left Minna early in the

morning after a sad good-bye. She knew from experience that as I was on

a money-raising expedition, she would not see me back till late at

night. The streets were enveloped in a dense fog, and the first thing I

recognised on leaving the house was my dog Robber, who had been stolen

from us a year before. At first I thought it was a ghost, but I called

out to him sharply in a shrill voice. The animal seemed to recognise

me, and approached me cautiously, but my sudden movement towards him

with outstretched arms seemed only to revive memories of the few

chastisements I had foolishly inflicted on him during the latter part

of our association, and this memory prevailed over all others. He drew

timidly away from me and, as I followed him with some eagerness, he

ran, only to accelerate his speed when he found he was being pursued. I

became more and more convinced that he had recognised me, because he

always looked back anxiously when he reached a corner; but seeing that

I was hunting him like a maniac, he started off again each time with

renewed energy. Thus I followed him through a labyrinth of streets,

hardly distinguishable in the thick mist, until I eventually lost sight

of him altogether, never to see him again. It was near the church of

St. Roch, and I, wet with perspiration and quite breathless, was still

bearing the metronome. For a while I stood motionless, glaring into the

mist, and wondered what the ghostly reappearance of the companion of my

travelling adventures on this day might portend! The fact that he had

fled from his old master with the terror of a wild beast filled my

heart with a strange bitterness and seemed to me a horrible omen. Sadly

shaken, I set out again, with trembling limbs, upon my weary errand.

Heinrich Brockhaus told me he could not help me, and I left him. I was

sorely ashamed, but made a strong effort to conceal the painfulness of

my situation. My other undertakings turned out equally hopeless, and

after having been kept waiting for hours at Schlesinger’s, listening to

my employer’s very trivial conversations with his callers—conversations

which he seemed purposely to protract—I reappeared under the windows of

my home long after dark, utterly unsuccessful. I saw Minna looking

anxiously from one of the windows. Half expecting my misfortune she

had, in the meantime, succeeded in borrowing a small sum of our lodger

and boarder, Brix, the flute-player, whom we tolerated patiently,

though at some inconvenience to ourselves, as he was a good-natured

fellow. So she was able to offer me at least a comfortable meal.

Further help was to come to me subsequently, though at the cost of

great sacrifices on my part, owing to the success of one of Donizetti’s

operas, La Favorita, a very poor work of the Italian maestro’s, but

welcomed with great enthusiasm by the Parisian public, already so much

degenerated. This opera, the success of which was due mainly to two

lively little songs, had been acquired by Schlesinger, who had lost

heavily over Halevy’s last operas.

Taking advantage of my helpless situation, of which he was well aware,

he rushed into our rooms one morning, beaming all over with amusing

good-humour, called for pen and ink, and began to work out a

calculation of the enormous fees which he had arranged for me! He put

down: ‘La Favorita, complete arrangement for pianoforte, arrangement

without words, for solo; ditto, for duet; complete arrangement for

quartette; the same for two violins; ditto for a Cornet a piston. Total

fee, frcs. 1100. Immediate advance in cash, frcs. 500.’ I could see at

a glance what an enormous amount of trouble this work would involve,

but I did not hesitate a moment to undertake it.

Curiously enough, when I brought home these five hundred francs in hard

shining five-franc pieces, and piled them up on the table for our

edification, my sister Cecilia Avenarius happened to drop in to see us.

The sight of this abundance of wealth seemed to produce a good effect

on her, as she had hitherto been rather chary of coming to see us; and

after that we used to see rather more of her, and were often invited to

dine with them on Sundays. But I no longer cared for any amusements. I

was so deeply impressed by my past experiences that I made up my mind

to work through this humiliating, albeit profitable task, with untiring

energy, as though it were a penance imposed on me for the expiation of

my bygone sins. To save fuel, we limited ourselves to the use of the

bedroom, making it serve as a drawing-room, dining-room, and study, as

well as dormitory. It was only a step from my bed to my work-table; to

be seated at the dining-table, all I had to do was to turn my chair

round, and I left my seat altogether only late at night when I wanted

to go to bed again. Every fourth day I allowed myself a short

constitutional. This penitential process lasted almost all through the

winter, and sowed the seeds of those gastric disorders which were to be

more or less of a trouble to me for the rest of my life.

In return for the minute and almost interminable work of correcting the

score of Donizetti’s opera, I managed to get three hundred francs from

Schlesinger, as he could not get any one else to do it. Besides this, I

had to find the time to copy out the orchestra parts of my overture to

Faust, which I was still hoping to hear at the Conservatoire; and by

the way of counteracting the depression produced by this humiliating

occupation, I wrote a short story, Eine Pilgerfahrt zu Beethoven (A

Pilgrimage to Beethoven), which appeared in the Gazette Musicale, under

the title Une Visite a Beethoven. Schlesinger told me candidly that

this little work had created quite a sensation, and had been received

with very marked approval; and, indeed, it was actually reproduced,

either complete or in parts, in a good many fireside journals.

He persuaded me to write some more of the same kind; and in a sequel

entitled Das Ende eines Musikers in Paris (Un Musicien etranger a

Paris) I avenged myself for all the misfortunes I had had to endure.

Schlesinger was not quite so pleased with this as with my first effort,

but it received touching signs of approval from his poor assistant;

while Heinrich Heine praised it by saying that ‘Hoffmann would have

been incapable of writing such a thing.’ Even Berlioz was touched by

it, and spoke of the story very favourably in one of his articles in

the Journal des Debats. He also gave me signs of his sympathy, though

only during a conversation, after the appearance of another of my

musical articles entitled Ueber die Ouverture (Concerning Overtures),

mainly because I had illustrated my principle by pointing to Gluck’s

overture to Iphigenia in Aulis as a model for compositions of this

class.

Encouraged by these signs of sympathy, I felt anxious to become more

intimately acquainted with Berlioz. I had been introduced to him some

time previously at Schlesinger’s office, where we used to meet

occasionally. I had presented him with a copy of my Two Grenadiers, but

could, however, never learn any more from him concerning what he really

thought of it than the fact that as he could only strum a little on the

guitar, he was unable to play the music of my composition to himself on

the piano. During the previous winter I had often heard his grand

instrumental pieces played under his own direction, and had been most

favourably impressed by them. During that winter (1839-40) he conducted

three performances of his new symphony, Romeo and Juliet, at one of

which I was present.

All this, to be sure, was quite a new world to me, and I was desirous

of gaining some unprejudiced knowledge of it. At first the grandeur and

masterly execution of the orchestral part almost overwhelmed me. It was

beyond anything I could have conceived. The fantastic daring, the sharp

precision with which the boldest combinations—almost tangible in their

clearness—impressed me, drove back my own ideas of the poetry of music

with brutal violence into the very depths of my soul. I was simply all

ears for things of which till then I had never dreamt, and which I felt

I must try to realise. True, I found a great deal that was empty and

shallow in his Romeo and Juliet, a work that lost much by its length

and form of combination; and this was the more painful to me seeing

that, on the other hand, I felt overpowered by many really bewitching

passages which quite overcame any objections on my part.

During the same winter Berlioz produced his Sinfonie Fantastique and

his Harald (‘Harold en Italie’). I was also much impressed by these

works; the musical genre-pictures woven into the first-named symphony

were particularly pleasing, while Harald delighted me in almost every

respect..

It was, however, the latest work of this wonderful master, his

Trauer-Symphonie fur die Opfer der Juli-Revolution (Grande Symphonie

Funebre et Triomphale), most skilfully composed for massed military

bands during the summer of 1840 for the anniversary of the obsequies of

the July heroes, and conducted by him under the column of the Place de

la Bastille, which had at last thoroughly convinced me of the greatness

and enterprise of this incomparable artist. But while admiring this

genius, absolutely unique in his methods, I could never quite shake off

a certain peculiar feeling of anxiety. His works left me with a

sensation as of something strange, something with which I felt I should

never be able to be familiar, and I was often puzzled at the strange

fact that, though ravished by his compositions, I was at the same time

repelled and even wearied by them. It was only much later that I

succeeded in clearly grasping and solving this problem, which for years

exercised such a painful spell over me.

It is a fact that at that time I felt almost like a little school-boy

by the side of Berlioz. Consequently I was really embarrassed when

Schlesinger, determined to make good use of the success of my short

story, told me he was anxious to produce some of my orchestral

compositions at a concert arranged by the editor of the Gazette

Musicale. I realised that none of my available works would in any way

be suitable for such an occasion. I was not quite confident as to my

Faust Overture because of its zephyr-like ending, which I presumed

could only be appreciated by an audience already familiar with my

methods. When, moreover, I learned that I should have only a

second-rate orchestra—the Valentino from the Casino, Rue St.

Honore—and, moreover, that there could be only one rehearsal, my only

alternative lay between declining altogether, or making another trial

with my Columbus Overture, the work composed in my early days at

Magdeburg. I adopted the latter course.

When I went to fetch the score of this composition from Ilabeneck, who

had it stored among the archives of the Conservatoire, he warned me

somewhat dryly, though not without kindness, of the danger of

presenting this work to the Parisian public, as, to use his own words,

it was too ‘vague.’ One great objection was the difficulty of finding

capable musicians for the six cornets required, as the music for this

instrument, so skilfully played in Germany, could hardly, if ever, be

satisfactorily executed in Paris. Herr Schlitz, the corrector of my

‘Suites’ for Cornet a piston, offered his assistance. I was compelled

to reduce my six cornets to four, and he told me that only two of these

could be relied on.

As a matter of fact, the attempts made at the rehearsal to produce

those very passages on which the effect of my work chiefly depended

were very discouraging. Not once were the soft high notes played but

they were flat or altogether wrong. In addition to this, as I was not

going to be allowed to conduct the work myself, I had to rely upon a

conductor who, as I was well aware, had fully convinced himself that my

composition was the most utter rubbish—an opinion that seemed to be

shared by the whole orchestra. Berlioz, who was present at the

rehearsal, remained silent throughout. He gave me no encouragement,

though he did not dissuade me. He merely said afterwards, with a weary

smile, ‘that it was very difficult to get on in Paris.’

On the night of the performance (4th February 1841) the audience, which

was largely composed of subscribers to the Gazette Musicale, and to

whom, therefore, my literary successes were not unknown, seemed rather

favourably disposed towards me. I was told later on that my overture,

however wearisome it had been, would certainly have been applauded if

those unfortunate cornet players, by continually failing to produce the

effective passages, had not excited the public almost to the point of

hostility; for Parisians, for the most part, care only for the skilful

parts of performances, as, for instance, for the faultless production

of difficult tones. I was clearly conscious of my complete failure.

After this misfortune Paris no longer existed for me, and all I had to

do was to go back to my miserable bedroom and resume my work of

arranging Donizetti’s operas.

So great was my renunciation of the world that, like a penitent, I no

longer shaved, and to my wife’s annoyance, for the first and only time

in my life allowed my beard to grow quite long. I tried to bear

everything patiently, and the only thing that threatened really to

drive me to despair was a pianist in the room adjoining ours who during

the livelong day practised Liszt’s fantasy on Lucia di Lammermoor. I

had to put a stop to this torture, so, to give him an idea of what he

made us endure, one day I moved our own piano, which was terribly out

of tune, close up to the party wall. Then Brix with his piccolo-flute

played the piano-and-violin (or flute) arrangement of the Favorita

Overture I had just completed, while I accompanied him on the piano.

The effect on our neighbour, a young piano-teacher, must have been

appalling. The concierge told me the next day that the poor fellow was

leaving, and, after all, I felt rather sorry.

The wife of our concierge had entered into a sort of arrangement with

us. At first we had occasionally availed ourselves of her services,

especially in the kitchen, also for brushing clothes, cleaning boots,

and so on; but even the slight outlay that this involved was eventually

too heavy for us, and after having dispensed with her services, Minna

had to suffer the humiliation of doing the whole work of the household,

even the most menial part of it, herself. As we did not like to mention

this to Brix, Minna was obliged, not only to do all the cooking and

washing up, but even to clean our lodger’s boots as well. What we felt

most, however, was the thought of what the concierge and his wife would

think of us; but we were mistaken, for they only respected us the more,

though of course we could not avoid a little familiarity at times, Now

and then, therefore, the man would have a chat with me on politics.

When the Quadruple Alliance against France had been concluded, and the

situation under Thiers’ ministry was regarded as very critical, my

concierge tried to reassure me one day by saying: ‘Monsieur, il y a

quatre hommes en Europe qui s’appellent: le roi Louis Philippe,

l’empereur d’Autriche, l’empereur de Russie, le roi de Prusse; eh bien,

ces quatre sont des c…; et nous n’aurons pas la guerre.’

Of an evening I very seldom lacked entertainment; but the few faithful

friends who came to see me had to put up with my going on scribbling

music till late in the night. Once they prepared a touching surprise

for me in the form of a little party which they arranged for New Year’s

Eve (1840). Lehrs arrived at dusk, rang the bell, and brought a leg of

veal; Kietz brought some rum, sugar, and a lemon; Pecht supplied a

goose; and Anders two bottles of the champagne with which he had been

presented by a musical instrument-maker in return for a flattering

article he had written about his pianos. Bottles from that stock were

produced only on very great occasions. I soon threw the confounded

Favorita aside, therefore, and entered enthusiastically into the fun.

We all had to assist in the preparations, to light the fire in the

salon, give a hand to my wife in the kitchen, and get what was wanted

from the grocer. The supper developed into a dithyrambic orgy. When the

champagne was drunk, and the punch began to produce its effects, I

delivered a fiery speech which so provoked the hilarity of the company

that it seemed as though it would never end. I became so excited that I

first mounted a chair, and then, by way of heightening the effect, at

last stood on the table, thence to preach the maddest gospel of the

contempt of life together with a eulogy on the South American Free

States. My charmed listeners eventually broke into such fits of sobs

and laughter, and were so overcome, that we had to give them all

shelter for the night—their condition making it impossible for them to

reach their own homes in safety. On New Year’s Day (1841) I was again

busy with my Favorita.

I remember another similar though far less boisterous feast, on the

occasion of a visit paid us by the famous violinist Vieux-temps, an old

schoolfellow of Kietz’s. We had the great pleasure of hearing the young

virtuoso, who was then greatly feted in Paris, play to us charmingly

for a whole evening—a performance which lent my little salon an unusual

touch of ‘fashion.’ Kietz rewarded him for his kindness by carrying him

on his shoulders to his hotel close by.

We were hard hit in the early part of this year by a mistake I made

owing to my ignorance of Paris customs. It seemed to us quite a matter

of course that we should wait until the proper quarter-day to give

notice to our landlady. So I called on the proprietress of the house, a

rich young widow living in one of her own houses in the Marias quarter.

She received me, but seemed much embarrassed, and said she would speak

to her agent about the matter, and eventually referred me to him. The

next day I was informed by letter that my notice would have been valid

had it been given two days earlier. By this omission I had rendered

myself liable, according to the agreement, for another year’s rent.

Horrified by this news, I went to see the agent himself, and after

having been kept waiting for a long time—as a matter of fact they would

not let me in at all—I found an elderly gentleman, apparently crippled

by some very painful malady, lying motionless before me. I frankly told

him my position, and begged him most earnestly to release me from my

agreement, but I was merely told that the fault was mine, and not his,

that I had given notice a day too late, and consequently that I must

find the rent for the next year. My concierge, to whom, with some

emotion, I related the story of this occurrence, tried to soothe me by

saying: ‘J’aurais pu vous dire cela, car voyez, monsieur, cet homme ne

vaut pas l’eau qu’il boit.’

This entirely unforeseen misfortune destroyed our last hopes of getting

out of our disastrous position. We consoled ourselves for awhile with

the hope of finding another lodger, but the fates were once more

against us. Easter came, the new term began, and our prospects were as

hopeless as ever. At last our concierge recommended us to a family who

were willing to take the whole of our apartment, furniture included,

off our hands for a few months. We gladly accepted this offer; for, at

any rate, it ensured the payment of the rent for the ensuing quarter.

We thought if only we could get away from this unfortunate place we

should find some way of getting rid of it altogether. We therefore

decided to find a cheap summer residence for ourselves in the outskirts

of Paris.

Meudon had been mentioned to us as an inexpensive summer resort, and we

selected an apartment in the avenue which joins Meudon to the

neighbouring village of Bellevue. We left full authority with our

concierge as to our rooms in Rue du Helder, and settled down in our new

temporary abode as well as we could. Old Brix, the good-natured

flutist, had to stay with us again, for, owing to the fact that his

usual receipts had been delayed, he would have been in great straits

had we refused to give him shelter. The removal of our scanty

possessions took place on the 29th of April, and was, after all, no

more than a flight from the impossible into the unknown, for how we

were going to live during the following summer we had not the faintest

idea. Schlesinger had no work for me, and no other sources were

available.

The only help we could hope for seemed to lie in journalistic work

which, though rather unremunerative, had indeed given me the

opportunity of making a little success. During the previous winter I

had written a long article on Weber’s Freischutz for the Gazette

Musicale. This was intended to prepare the way for the forthcoming

first performance of this opera, after recitatives from the pen of

Berlioz had been added to it. The latter was apparently far from

pleased at my article. In the article I could not help referring to

Berlioz’s absurd idea of polishing up this old-fashioned musical work

by adding ingredients that spoiled its original characteristics, merely

in order to give it an appearance suited to the luxurious repertoire of

Opera House. The fact that the result fully justified my forecasts did

not in the least tend to diminish the ill-feeling I had roused among

all those concerned in the production; but I had the satisfaction of

hearing that the famous George Sand had noticed my article. She

commenced the introduction to a legendary story of French provincial

life by repudiating certain doubts as to the ability of the French

people to understand the mystic, fabulous element which, as I had

shown, was displayed in such a masterly manner in Freischutz, and she

pointed to my article as clearly explaining the characteristics of that

opera.

Another journalistic opportunity arose out of my endeavours to secure

the acceptance of my Rienzi by the Court Theatre at Dresden. Herr

Winkler, the secretary of that theatre, whom I have already mentioned,

regularly reported progress; but as editor of the Abendzeitung, a paper

then rather on the wane, he seized the opportunity presented by our

negotiations in order to ask me to send him frequent and gratuitous

contributions. The consequence was, that whenever I wanted to know

anything concerning the fate of my opera, I had to oblige him by

enclosing an article for his paper. Now, as these negotiations with the

Court Theatre lasted a very long time, and involved a large number of

contributions from me, I often got into the most extraordinary fixes

simply owing to the fact that I was now once more a prisoner in my

room, and had been so for some time, and therefore knew nothing of what

was going on in Paris.

I had serious reasons for thus withdrawing from the artistic and social

life of Paris. My own painful experiences and my disgust at all the

mockery of that kind of life, once so attractive to me and yet so alien

to my education, had quickly driven me away from everything connected

with it. It is true that the production of the Huguenots, for instance,

which I then heard for the first time, dazzled me very much indeed. Its

beautiful orchestral execution, and the extremely careful and effective

mise en scene, gave me a grand idea of the great possibilities of such

perfect and definite artistic means. But, strange to say, I never felt

inclined to hear the same opera again. I soon became tired of the

extravagant execution of the vocalists, and I often amused my friends

exceedingly by imitating the latest Parisian methods and the vulgar

exaggerations with which the performances teemed. Those composers,

moreover, who aimed at achieving success by adopting the style which

was then in vogue, could not help, either, incurring my sarcastic

criticism. The last shred of esteem which I still tried to retain for

the ‘first lyrical theatre in the world’ was at last rudely destroyed

when I saw how such an empty, altogether un-French work as Donizetti’s

Favorita could secure so long and important a run at this theatre.

During the whole time of my stay in Paris I do not think I went to the

opera more than four times. The cold productions at the Opera Comique,

and the degenerate quality of the music produced there, had repelled me

from the start; and the same lack of enthusiasm displayed by the

singers also drove me from Italian opera. The names, often very famous

ones, of these artists who sang the same four operas for years could

not compensate me for the complete absence of sentiment which

characterised their performance, so unlike that of Schroder-Devrient,

which I so thoroughly enjoyed. I clearly saw that everything was on the

down grade, and yet I cherished no hope or desire to see this state of

decline superseded by a period of newer and fresher life. I preferred

the small theatres, where French talent was shown in its true light;

and yet, as the result of my own longings, I was too intent upon

finding points of relationship in them which would excite my sympathy,

for it to be possible for me to realise those peculiar excellences in

them which did not happen to interest me at all. Besides, from the very

beginning my own troubles had proved so trying, and the consciousness

of the failure of my Paris schemes had become so cruelly apparent,

that, either out of indifference or annoyance, I declined all

invitations to the theatres. Again and again, much to Minna’s regret, I

returned tickets for performances in which Rachel was to appear at the

Theatre Francais, and, in fact, saw that famous theatre only once,

when, some time later, I had to go there on business for my Dresden

patron, who wanted some more articles.

I adopted the most shameful means for filling the columns of the

Abendzeitung; I just strung together whatever I happened to hear in the

evening from Anders and Lehrs. But as they had no very exciting

adventures either, they simply told me all they had picked up from

papers and table-talk, and this I tried to render with as much piquancy

as possible in accordance with the journalistic style created by Heine,

which was all the rage at the time. My one fear was lest old Hofrath

Winkler should some day discover the secret of my wide knowledge of

Paris. Among other things which I sent to his declining paper was a

long account of the production of Freischutz, He was particularly

interested in it, as he was the guardian of Weber’s children; and when

in one of his letters he assured me that he would not rest until he had

got the definite assurance that Rienzi had been accepted, I sent him,

with my most profuse thanks, the German manuscript of my ‘Beethoven’

story for his paper. The 1841 edition of this gazette, then published

by Arnold, but now no longer in existence, contains the only print of

this manuscript.

My occasional journalistic work was increased by a request from Lewald,

the editor of Europa, a literary monthly, asking me to write something

for him. This man was the first who, from time to time, had mentioned

my name to the public. As he used to publish musical supplements to his

elegant and rather widely read magazine, I sent him two of my

compositions from Königsberg for publication. One of these was the

music I had set to a melancholy poem by Scheuerlin, entitled Der Knabe

und der Tannenbaum (a work of which even to-day I am still proud), and

my beautiful Carnevals Lied out of Liebesverbot.

When I wanted to publish my little French compositions—Dors, mon

enfant, and the music to Hugo’s Attente and Ronsard’s Mignonne—Lewald

not only sent me a small fee—the first I had ever received for a

composition—but commissioned some long articles on my Paris

impressions, which he begged me to write as entertainingly as possible.

For his paper I wrote Pariser Amusements and Pariser Fatalitaten, in

which I gave vent in a humorous style, a la Heine, to all my

disappointing experiences in Paris, and to all my contempt for the life

led by its inhabitants. In the second I described the existence of a

certain Hermann Pfau, a strange good-for-nothing with whom, during my

early Leipzig days, I had become more intimately acquainted than was

desirable. This man had been wandering about Paris like a vagrant ever

since the beginning of the previous winter, and the meagre income I

derived from arrangements of La Favorita was often partly consumed in

helping this completely broken-down fellow. So it was only fair that I

should get back a few francs of the money spent on him in Paris by

turning his adventures to some account in Lewald’s newspapers.

When I came into contact with Leon Pillet, the manager of the Opera, my

literary work took yet another direction. After numerous inquiries I

eventually discovered that he had taken a fancy to my draft of the

Fliegender Holländer. He informed me of this, and asked me to sell him

the plot, as he was under contract to supply various composers with

subjects for operettas. I tried to explain to Pillet, both verbally and

in writing, that he could hardly expect that the plot would be properly

treated except by myself, as this draft was in fact my own idea, and

that it had only come to his knowledge by my having submitted it to

him. But it was all to no purpose. He was obliged to admit quite

frankly that the expectations I had cherished as to the result of

Meyerbeer’s recommendation to him would not come to anything. He said

there was no likelihood of my getting a commission for a composition,

even of a light opera, for the next seven years, as his already

existing contracts extended over that period. He asked me to be

sensible, and to sell him the draft for a small amount, so that he

might have the music written by an author to be selected by him; and he

added that if I still wished to try my luck at the Opera House, I had

better see the ‘ballet-master,’ as he might want some music for a

certain dance. Seeing that I contemptuously refused this proposal, he

left me to my own devices.

After endless and unsuccessful attempts at getting the matter settled,

I at last begged Edouard Monnaie, the Commissaire for the Royal

Theatres, who was not only a friend of mine, but also editor of the

Gazette Musicale, to act as mediator. He candidly confessed that he

could not understand Pillet’s liking for my plot, which he also was

acquainted with; but as Pillet seemed to like it—though he would

probably lose it—he advised me to accept anything for it, as Monsieur

Paul Faucher, a brother-in-law of Victor Hugo’s, had had an offer to

work out the scheme for a similar libretto. This gentleman had,

moreover, declared that there was nothing new in my plot, as the story

of the Vaisseau Fantome was well known in France. I now saw how I

stood, and, in a conversation with Pillet, at which M. Faucher was

present, I said I would come to an arrangement. My plot was generously

estimated by Pillet at five hundred francs, and I received that amount

from the cash office at the theatre, to be subsequently deducted from

the author’s rights of the future poet.

Our summer residence in the Avenue de Meudon now assumed quite a

definite character. These five hundred francs had to help me to work

out the words and music of my Fliegender Holländer for Germany, while I

abandoned the French Vaisseau Fantome to its fate.

The state of my affairs, which was getting ever worse and worse, was

slightly improved by the settlement of this matter. May and June had

gone by, and during these months our troubles had grown steadily more

serious. The lovely season of the year, the stimulating country air,

and the sensation of freedom following upon my deliverance from the

wretchedly paid musical hack-work I had had to do all the winter,

wrought their beneficial effects on me, and I was inspired to write a

small story entitled Ein glucklicher Abend. This was translated and

published in French in the Gazette Musicale. Soon, however, our lack of

funds began to make itself felt with a severity that was very

discouraging. We felt this all the more keenly when my sister Cecilia

and her husband, following our example, moved to a place quite close to

us. Though not wealthy, they were fairly well-to-do. They came to see

us every day, but we never thought it desirable to let them know how

terribly hard-up we were. One day it came to a climax. Being absolutely

without money, I started out, early one morning, to walk to Paris—for I

had not even enough to pay the railway fare thither—and I resolved to

wander about the whole day, trudging from street to street, even until

late in the afternoon, in the hope of raising a five-franc piece; but

my errand proved absolutely vain, and I had to walk all the way back to

Meudon again, utterly penniless.

When I told Minna, who came to meet me, of my failure, she informed me

in despair that Hermann Pfau, whom I have mentioned before, had also

come to us in the most pitiful plight, and actually in want of food,

and that she had had to give him the last of the bread delivered by the

baker that morning. The only hope that now remained was that, at any

rate, my lodger Brix, who by a singular fate was now our companion in

misfortune, would return with some success from the expedition to Paris

which he also had made that morning. At last he, too, returned bathed

in perspiration and exhausted, driven home by the craving for a meal,

which he had been unable to procure in the town, as he could not find

any of the acquaintances he went to see. He begged most piteously for a

piece of bread. This climax to the situation at last inspired my wife

with heroic resolution; for she felt it her duty to exert herself to

appease at least the hunger of her menfolk. For the first time during

her stay on French soil, she persuaded the baker, the butcher, and

wine-merchant, by plausible arguments, to supply her with the

necessaries of life without immediate cash payment, and Minna’s eyes

beamed when, an hour later, she was able to put before us an excellent

meal, during which, as it happened, we were surprised by the Avenarius

family, who were evidently relieved at finding us so well provided for.

This extreme distress was relieved for a time, at the beginning of

July, by the sale of my Vaisseau Fantome, which meant my final

renunciation of my success in Paris. As long as the five hundred francs

lasted, I had an interval of respite for carrying on my work. The first

object on which I spent my money was on the hire of a piano, a thing of

which I had been entirely deprived for months. My chief intention in so

doing was to revive my faith in myself as a musician, as, ever since

the autumn of the previous year, I had exercised my talents as a

journalist and adapter of operas only. The libretto of the Fliegender

Holländer, which I had hurriedly written during the recent period of

distress, aroused considerable interest in Lehrs; he actually declared

I would never write anything better, and that the Fliegender Holländer

would be my Don Juan; the only thing now was to find the music for it.

As towards the end of the previous winter I still entertained the hopes

of being permitted to treat this subject for the French Opera, I had

already finished some of the words and music of the lyric parts, and

had had the libretto translated by Emile Deschamps, intending it for a

trial performance, which, alas, never took place. These parts were the

ballad of Senta, the song of the Norwegian sailors, and the ‘Spectre

Song’ of the crew of the Fliegender Holländer. Since that time I had

been so violently torn away from the music that, when the piano arrived

at my rustic retreat, I did not dare to touch it for a whole day. I was

terribly afraid lest I should discover that my inspiration had left

me—when suddenly I was seized with the idea that I had forgotten to

write out the song of the helmsman in the first act, although, as a

matter of fact, I could not remember having composed it at all, as I

had in reality only just written the lyrics. I succeeded, and was

pleased with the result. The same thing occurred with the ‘Spinner’s

Song,’ and when I had written out these two pieces, and, on further

reflection, could not help admitting that they had really only taken

shape in my mind at that moment, I was quite delirious with joy at the

discovery. In seven weeks the whole of the music of the Fliegender

Holländer, except the orchestration, was finished.

Thereupon followed a general revival in our circle; my exuberant good

spirits astonished every one, and my Avenarius relations in particular

thought I must really be prospering, as I was such good company. I

resumed my long walks in the woods of Meudon, frequently even

consenting to help Minna gather mushrooms, which, unfortunately, were

for her the chief charm of our woodland retreat, though it filled our

landlord with terror when he saw us returning with our spoils, as he

felt sure we should be poisoned if we ate them.

My destiny, which almost invariably led me into strange adventures,

here once more introduced me to the most eccentric character to be

found not only in the neighbourhood of Meudon, but even in Paris. This

was M. Jadin, who, though he was old enough to be able to say that he

remembered seeing Madame de Pompadour at Versailles, was still vigorous

beyond belief. It appeared to be his aim to keep the world in a

constant state of conjecture as to his real age; he made everything for

himself with his own hands, including even a quantity of wigs of every

shade, ranging in the most comic variety from youthful flaxen to the

most venerable white, with intermediate shades of grey; these he wore

alternately, as the fancy pleased him. He dabbled in everything, and I

was pleased to find he had a particular fancy for painting. The fact

that all the walls of his rooms were hung with the most childish

caricatures of animal life, and that he had even embellished the

outside of his blinds with the most ridiculous paintings, did not

disconcert me in the least; on the contrary, it confirmed my belief

that he did not dabble in music, until, to my horror, I discovered that

the strangely discordant sounds of a harp which kept reaching my ears

from some unknown region were actually proceeding from his basement,

where he had two harpsichords of his own invention. He informed me that

he had unfortunately neglected playing them for a long time, but that

he now meant to begin practising again assiduously in order to give me

pleasure. I succeeded in dissuading him from this, by assuring him that

the doctor had forbidden me to listen to the harp, as it was bad for my

nerves. His figure as I saw him for the last time remains impressed on

my memory, like an apparition from the world of Hoffmann’s fairy-tales.

In the late autumn, when we were going back to Paris, he asked us to

take with us on our furniture van an enormous stove-pipe, of which he

promised to relieve us shortly. One very cold day Jadin actually

presented himself at our new abode in Paris, in a most preposterous

costume of his own manufacture, consisting of very thin light-yellow

trousers, a very short pale-green dress-coat with conspicuously long

tails, projecting lace shirt frills and cuffs, a very fair wig, and a

hat so small that it was constantly dropping off; he wore in addition a

quantity of imitation jewellery—and all this on the undisguised

assumption that he could not go about in fashionable Paris dressed as

simply as in the country. He had come for the stove-pipe; we asked him

where the men to carry it were; in reply he simply smiled, and

expressed his surprise at our helplessness; and thereupon took the

enormous stove-pipe under his arm and absolutely refused to accept our

help when we offered to assist him in carrying it down the stairs,

though this operation, notwithstanding his vaunted skill, occupied him

quite half an hour. Every one in the house assembled to witness this

removal, but he was by no means disconcerted, and managed to get the

pipe through the street door, and then tripped gracefully along the

pavement with it, and disappeared from our sight.

For this short though eventful period, during which I was quite free to

give full scope to my inmost thoughts, I indulged in the consolation of

purely artistic creations. I can only say that, when it came to an end,

I had made such progress that I could look forward with cheerful

composure to the much longer period of trouble and distress I felt was

in store for me. This, in fact, duly set in, for I had only just

completed the last scene when I found that my five hundred francs were

coming to an end, and what was left was not sufficient to secure me the

necessary peace and freedom from worry for composing the overture; I

had to postpone this until my luck should take another favourable turn,

and meanwhile I was forced to engage in the struggle for a bare

subsistence, making efforts of all kinds that left me neither leisure

nor peace of mind. The concierge from the Rue du Helder brought us the

news that the mysterious family to whom we had let our rooms had left,

and that we were now once more responsible for the rent. I had to tell

him that I would not under any circumstances trouble about the rooms

any more, and that the landlord might recoup himself by the sale of the

furniture we had left there. This was done at a very heavy loss, and

the furniture, the greater part of which was still unpaid for, was

sacrificed to pay the rent of a dwelling which we no longer occupied.

Under the stress of the most terrible privations I still endeavoured to

secure sufficient leisure for working out the orchestration of the

score of the Fliegender Holländer. The rough autumn weather set in at

an exceptionally early date; people were all leaving their country

houses for Paris, and, among them, the Avenarius family. We, however,

could not dream of doing so, for we could not even raise the funds for

the journey. When M. Jadin expressed his surprise at this, I pretended

to be so pressed with work that I could not interrupt it, although I

felt the cold that penetrated through the thin walls of the house very

severely.

So I waited for help from Ernst Castel, one of my old Königsberg

friends, a well-to-do young merchant, who a short time before had

called on us in Meudon and treated us to a luxurious repast in Paris,

promising at the same time to relieve our necessities as soon as

possible by an advance, which we knew was an easy matter to him.

By way of cheering us up, Kietz came over to us one day, with a large

portfolio and a pillow under his arm; he intended to amuse us by

working at a large caricature representing myself and my unfortunate

adventures in Paris, and the pillow was to enable him, after his

labours, to get some rest on our hard couch, which he had noticed had

no pillows at the head. Knowing that we had a difficulty in procuring

fuel, he brought with him some bottles of rum, to ‘warm’ us with punch

during the cold evenings; under these circumstances I read Hoffmann’s

Tales to him and my wife.

At last I had news from Königsberg, but it only opened my eyes to the

fact that the gay young dog had not meant his promise seriously. We now

looked forward almost with despair to the chilly mists of approaching

winter, but Kietz, declaring that it was his place to find help, packed

up his portfolio, placed it under his arm with the pillow, and went off

to Paris. On the next day he returned with two hundred francs, that he

had managed to procure by means of generous self-sacrifice. We at once

set off for Paris, and took a small apartment near our friends, in the

back part of No. 14 Rue Jacob. I afterwards heard that shortly after we

left it was occupied by Proudhon.

We got back to town on 30th October. Our home was exceedingly small and

cold, and its chilliness in particular made it very bad for our health.

We furnished it scantily with the little we had saved from the wreck of

the Rue du Holder, and awaited the results of my efforts towards

getting my works accepted and produced in Germany. The first necessity

was at all costs to secure peace and quietness for myself for the short

time which I should have to devote to the overture of the Fliegender

Holländer; I told Kietz that he would have to procure the money

necessary for my household expenses until this work was finished and

the full score of the opera sent off. With the aid of a pedantic uncle,

who had lived in Paris a long time and who was also a painter, he

succeeded in providing me with the necessary assistance, in instalments

of five or ten francs at a time. During this period I often pointed

with cheerful pride to my boots, which became mere travesties of

footgear, as the soles eventually disappeared altogether.

As long as I was engaged on the Dutchman, and Kietz was looking after

me, this made no difference, for I never went out: but when I had

despatched my completed score to the management of the Berlin Court

Theatre at the beginning of December, the bitterness of the position

could no longer be disguised. It was necessary for me to buckle to and

look for help myself.

What this meant in Paris I learned just about this time from the

hapless fate of the worthy Lehrs. Driven by need such as I myself had

had to surmount a year before at about the same time, he had been

compelled on a broiling hot day in the previous summer to scour the

various quarters of the city breathlessly, to get grace for bills he

had accepted, and which had fallen due. He foolishly took an iced

drink, which he hoped would refresh him in his distressing condition,

but it immediately made him lose his voice, and from that day he was

the victim of a hoarseness which with terrific rapidity ripened the

seeds of consumption, doubtless latent in him, and developed that

incurable disease. For months he had been growing weaker and weaker,

filling us at last with the gloomiest anxiety: he alone believed the

supposed chill would be cured, if he could heat his room better for a

time. One day I sought him out in his lodging, where I found him in the

icy-cold room, huddled up at his writing-table, and complaining of the

difficulty of his work for Didot, which was all the more distressing as

his employer was pressing him for advances he had made.

He declared that if he had not had the consolation in those doleful

hours of knowing that I had, at any rate, got my Dutchman finished, and

that a prospect of success was thus opened to the little circle of

friends, his misery would have been hard indeed to bear. Despite my own

great trouble, I begged him to share our fire and work in my room. He

smiled at my courage in trying to help others, especially as my

quarters offered barely space enough for myself and my wife. However,

one evening he came to us and silently showed me a letter he had

received from Villemain, the Minister of Education at that time, in

which the latter expressed in the warmest terms his great regret at

having only just learned that so distinguished a scholar, whose able

and extensive collaboration in Didot’s issue of the Greek classics had

made him participator in a work that was the glory of the nation,

should be in such bad health and straitened circumstances.

Unfortunately, the amount of public money which he had at his disposal

at that moment for subsidising literature only allowed of his offering

him the sum of five hundred francs, which he enclosed with apologies,

asking him to accept it as a recognition of his merits on the part of

the French Government, and adding that it was his intention to give

earnest consideration as to how he might materially improve his

position.

This filled us with the utmost thankfulness on poor Lehrs’ account, and

we looked on the incident almost as a miracle. We could not help

assuming, however, that M. Villemain had been influenced by Didot, who

had been prompted by his own guilty conscience for his despicable

exploitation of Lehrs, and by the prospect of thus relieving himself of

the responsibility of helping him. At the same time, from similar cases

within our knowledge, which were fully confirmed by my own subsequent

experience, we were driven to the conclusion that such prompt and

considerate sympathy on the part of a minister would have been

impossible in Germany. Lehrs would now have a fire to work by, but

alas! our fears as to his declining health could not be allayed. When

we left Paris in the following spring, it was the certainty that we

should never see our dear friend again that made our parting so

painful.

In my own great distress I was again exposed to the annoyance of having

to write numerous unpaid articles for the Abendzeitung, as my patron,

Hofrath Winkler, was still unable to give me any satisfactory account

of the fate of my Rienzi in Dresden. In these circumstances I was

obliged to consider it a good thing that Halevy’s latest opera was at

last a success. Schlesinger came to us radiant with joy at the success

of La Reine de Chypre, and promised me eternal bliss for the piano

score and various other arrangements I had made of this newest rage in

the sphere of opera. So I was again forced to pay the penalty for

composing my own Fliegender Holländer by having to sit down and write

out arrangements of Halevy’s opera. Yet this task no longer weighed on

me so heavily. Apart from the wellfounded hope of being at last

recalled from my exile in Paris, and thus being able, as I thought, to

regard this last struggle with poverty as the decisive one, the

arrangement of Halevy’s score was far and away a more interesting piece

of hack-work than the shameful labour I had spent on Donizetti’s

Favorita.

I paid another visit, the last for a long time to come, to the Grand

Opera to hear this Reine de Chypre. There was, indeed, much for me to

smile at. My eyes were no longer shut to the extreme weakness of this

class of work, and the caricature of it that was often produced by the

method of rendering it. I was sincerely rejoiced to see the better side

of Halevy again. I had taken a great fancy to him from the time of his

La Juive, and had a very high opinion of his masterly talent.

At the request of Schlesinger I also willingly consented to write for

his paper a long article on Halevy’s latest work. In it I laid

particular stress on my hope that the French school might not again

allow the benefits obtained by studying the German style to be lost by

relapsing into the shallowest Italian methods. On that occasion I

ventured, by way of encouraging the French school, to point to the

peculiar significance of Auber, and particularly to his Stumme von

Portici, drawing attention, on the other hand, to the overloaded

melodies of Rossini, which often resembled sol-fa exercises. In reading

over the proof of my article I saw that this passage about Rossini had

been left out, and M. Edouard Monnaie admitted to me that, in his

capacity as editor of a musical paper, he had felt himself bound to

suppress it. He considered that if I had any adverse criticism to pass

on the composer, I could easily get it published in any other kind of

paper, but not in one devoted to the interests of music, simply because

such a passage could not be printed there without seeming absurd. It

also annoyed him that I had spoken in such high terms of Auber, but he

let it stand. I had to listen to much from that quarter which

enlightened me for ever with regard to the decay of operatic music in

particular, and artistic taste in general, among Frenchmen of the

present day.

I also wrote a longer article on the same opera for my precious friend

Winkler at Dresden, who was still hesitating about accepting my Rienzi.

In doing so I intentionally made merry over a mishap that had befallen

Lachner the conductor. Küstner, who was theatrical director at Munich

at the time, with a view to giving his friend another chance, ordered a

libretto to be written for him by St. Georges in Paris, so that,

through his paternal care, the highest bliss which a German composer

could dream of might be assured to his protege. Well, it turned out

that when Halevy’s Reine de Chypre appeared, it treated the same

subject as Lachner’s presumably original work, which had been composed

in the meantime. It mattered very little that the libretto was a really

good one, the value of the bargain lay in the fact that it was to be

glorified by Lachner’s music. It appeared, however, that St. Georges

had, as a matter of fact, to some extent altered the book sent to

Munich, but only by the omission of several interesting features. The

fury of the Munich manager was great, whereupon St. Georges declared

his astonishment that the latter could have imagined he would supply a

libretto intended solely for the German stage at the paltry price

offered by his German customer. As I had formed my own private opinion

as to procuring French librettos for operas, and as nothing in the

world would have induced me to set to music even the most effective

piece of writing by Scribe or St. Georges, this occurrence delighted me

immensely, and in the best of spirits I let myself go on the point for

the benefit of the readers of the Abendzeitung, who, it is to be hoped,

did not include my future ‘friend’ Lachner.

In addition, my work on Halevy’s opera (Reine de Chypre) brought me

into closer contact with that composer, and was the means of procuring

me many an enlivening talk with that peculiarly good-hearted and really

unassuming man, whose talent, alas, declined all too soon. Schlesinger,

in fact, was exasperated at his incorrigible laziness. Halevy, who had

looked through my piano score, contemplated several changes with a view

to making it easier, but he did not proceed with them: Schlesinger

could not get the proof-sheets back; the publication was consequently

delayed, and he feared that the popularity of the opera would be over

before the work was ready for the public. He urged me to get firm hold

of Halevy very early in the morning in his rooms, and compel him to set

to work at the alterations in my company.

The first time I reached his house at about ten in the morning, I found

him just out of bed, and he informed me that he really must have

breakfast first. I accepted his invitation, and sat down with him to a

somewhat luxurious meal; my conversation seemed to appeal to him, but

friends came in, and at last Schlesinger among the number, who burst

into a fury at not finding him at work on the proofs he regarded as so

important. Halevy, however, remained quite unmoved. In the best of good

tempers he merely complained of his latest success, because he had

never had more peace than of late, when his operas, almost without

exception, had been failures, and he had not had anything to do with

them after the first production. Moreover, he feigned not to understand

why this Reine de Chypre in particular should have been a success; he

declared that Schlesinger had engineered it on purpose to worry him.

When he spoke a few words to me in German, one of the visitors was

astonished, whereupon Schlesinger said that all Jews could speak

German. Thereupon Schlesinger was asked if he also was a Jew. He

answered that he had been, but had become a Christian for his wife’s

sake. This freedom of speech was a pleasant surprise to me, because in

Germany in such cases we always studiously avoided the point, as

discourteous to the person referred to. But as we never got to the

proof correcting, Schlesinger made me promise to give Halevy no peace

until we had done them.

The secret of his indifference to success became clear to me in the

course of further conversation, as I learned that he was on the point

of making a wealthy marriage. At first I was inclined to think that

Halevy was simply a man whose youthful talent was only stimulated to

achieve one great success with the object of becoming rich; in his

case, however, this was not the only reason, as he was very modest in

regard to his own capacity, and had no great opinion of the works of

those more fortunate composers who were writing for the French stage at

that time. In him I thus, for the first time, met with the frankly

expressed admission of disbelief in the value of all our modern

creations in this dubious field of art. I have since come to the

conclusion that this incredulity, often expressed with much less

modesty, justifies the participation of all Jews in our artistic

concerns. Only once did Halevy speak to me with real candour, when, on

my tardy departure for Germany, he wished me the success he thought my

works deserved.

In the year 1860 I saw him again. I had learned that, while the

Parisian critics were giving vent to the bitterest condemnation of the

concerts I was giving at that time, he had expressed his approval, and

this determined me to visit him at the Palais de l’Institut, of which

he had for some time been permanent secretary. He seemed particularly

eager to learn from my own lips what my new theory about music really

was, of which he had heard such wild rumours. For his own part, he

said, he had never found anything but music in my music, but with this

difference, that mine had generally seemed very good. This gave rise to

a lively discussion on my part, to which he good-humouredly agreed,

once more wishing me success in Paris. This time, however, he did so

with less conviction than when he bade me good-bye for Germany, which I

thought was because he doubted whether I could succeed in Paris. From

this final visit I carried away a depressing sense of the enervation,

both moral and aesthetic, which had overcome one of the last great

French musicians, while, on the other hand, I could not help feeling

that a tendency to a hypocritical or frankly impudent exploitation of

the universal degeneracy marked all who could be designated as Halevy’s

successors.

Throughout this period of constant hack-work my thoughts were entirely

bent on my return to Germany, which now presented itself to my mind in

a wholly new and ideal light. I endeavoured in various ways to secure

all that seemed most attractive about the project, or which filled my

soul with longing. My intercourse with Lehrs had, on the whole, given a

decided spur to my former tendency to grapple seriously with my

subjects, a tendency which had been counteracted by closer contact with

the theatre. This desire now furnished a basis for closer study of

philosophical questions. I had been astonished at times to hear even

the grave and virtuous Lehrs, openly and quite as a matter of course,

give expression to grave doubts concerning our individual survival

after death. He declared that in many great men this doubt, even though

only tacitly held, had been the real incitement to noble deeds. The

natural result of such a belief speedily dawned on me without, however,

causing me any serious alarm. On the contrary, I found a fascinating

stimulus in the fact that boundless regions of meditation and knowledge

were thereby opened up which hitherto I had merely skimmed in

light-hearted levity.

In my renewed attempts to study the Greek classics in the original, I

received no encouragement from Lehrs. He dissuaded me from doing so

with the well-meant consolation, that as I could only be born once, and

that with music in me, I should learn to understand this branch of

knowledge without the help of grammar or lexicon; whereas if Greek were

to be studied with real enjoyment, it was no joke, and would not suffer

being relegated to a secondary place.

On the other hand, I felt strongly drawn to gain a closer acquaintance

of German history than I had secured at school. I had Raumer’s History

of the Hohenstaufen within easy reach to start upon. All the great

figures in this book lived vividly before my eyes. I was particularly

captivated by the personality of that gifted Emperor Frederick II.,

whose fortunes aroused my sympathy so keenly that I vainly sought for a

fitting artistic setting for them. The fate of his son Manfred, on the

other hand, provoked in me an equally well-grounded, but more easily

combated, feeling of opposition.

I accordingly made a plan of a great five-act dramatic poem, which

should also be perfectly adapted to a musical setting. My impulse to

embellish the story with the central figure of romantic significance

was prompted by the fact of Manfred’s enthusiastic reception in Luceria

by the Saracens, who supported him and carried him on from victory to

victory till he reached his final triumph, and this, too, in spite of

the fact that he had come to them betrayed on every hand, banned by the

Church, and deserted by all his followers during his flight through

Apulia and the Abruzzi.

Even at this time it delighted me to find in the German mind the

capacity of appreciating beyond the narrow bounds of nationality all

purely human qualities, in however strange a garb they might be

presented. For in this I recognised how nearly akin it is to the mind

of Greece. In Frederick II. I saw this quality in full flower. A

fair-haired German of ancient Swabian stock, heir to the Norman realm

of Sicily and Naples, who gave the Italian language its first

development, and laid a basis for the evolution of knowledge and art

where hitherto ecclesiastical fanaticism and feudal brutality had alone

contended for power, a monarch who gathered at his court the poets and

sages of eastern lands, and surrounded himself with the living products

of Arabian and Persian grace and spirit—this man I beheld betrayed by

the Roman clergy to the infidel foe, yet ending his crusade, to their

bitter disappointment, by a pact of peace with the Sultan, from whom he

obtained a grant of privileges to Christians in Palestine such as the

bloodiest victory could scarcely have secured.

In this wonderful Emperor, who finally, under the ban of that same

Church, struggled hopelessly and in vain against the savage bigotry of

his age, I beheld the German ideal in its highest embodiment. My poem

was concerned with the fate of his favourite son Manfred. On the death

of an elder brother, Frederick’s empire had entirely fallen to pieces,

and the young Manfred was left, under papal suzerainty, in nominal

possession of the throne of Apulia. We find him at Capua, in

surroundings, and attended by a court, in which the spirit of his great

father survives, in a state of almost effeminate degeneration. In

despair of ever restoring the imperial power of the Hohenstaufen, he

seeks to forget his sadness in romance and song. There now appears upon

the scene a young Saracen lady, just arrived from the East, who, by

appealing to the alliance between East and West concluded by Manfred’s

noble father, conjures the desponding son to maintain his imperial

heritage. She acts the part of an inspired prophetess, and though the

prince is quickly filled with love for her, she succeeds in keeping him

at a respectful distance. By a skilfully contrived flight she snatches

him, not only from the pursuit of rebellious Apulian nobles, but also

from the papal ban which is threatening to depose him from his throne.

Accompanied only by a few faithful followers, she guides him through

mountain fastnesses, where one night the wearied son beholds the spirit

of Frederick II. passing with feudal array through the Abruzzi, and

beckoning him on to Luceria.

To this district, situated in the Papal States, Frederick had, by a

peaceful compact, transplanted the remnant of his Saracen retainers,

who had previously been wreaking terrible havoc in the mountains of

Sicily. To the great annoyance of the Pope, he had handed the town over

to them in fee-simple, thus securing for himself a band of faithful

allies in the heart of an ever-treacherous and hostile country.

Fatima, as my heroine is called, has prepared, through the

instrumentality of trusty friends, a reception for Manfred in this

place. When the papal governor has been expelled by a revolution, he

slips through the gateway into the town, is recognised by the whole

population as the son of their beloved Emperor, and, amid wildest

enthusiasm, is placed at their head, to lead them against the enemies

of their departed benefactor. In the meantime, while Manfred is

marching on from victory to victory in his reconquest of the whole

kingdom of Apulia, the tragic centre of my action still continues to be

the unvoiced longing of the lovelorn victor for the marvellous heroine.

She is the child of the great Emperor’s love for a noble Saracen

maiden. Her mother, on her deathbed, had sent her to Manfred,

foretelling that she would work wonders for his glory provided she

never yielded to his passion. Whether Fatima was to know that she was

his sister I left undecided in framing my plot. Meanwhile she is

careful to show herself to him only at critical moments, and then

always in such a way as to remain unapproachable. When at last she

witnesses the completion of her task in his coronation at Naples, she

determines, in obedience to her vow, to slip away secretly from the

newly anointed king, that she may meditate in the solitude of her

distant home upon the success of her enterprise.

The Saracen Nurreddin, who had been a companion of her youth, and to

whose help she had chiefly owed her success in rescuing Manfred, is to

be the sole partner of her flight. To this man, who loves her with

passionate ardour, she had been promised in her childhood. Before her

secret departure she pays a last visit to the slumbering king. This

rouses her lover’s furious jealousy, as he construes her act into a

proof of unfaithfulness on the part of his betrothed. The last look of

farewell which Fatima casts from a distance at the young monarch, on

his return from his coronation, inflames the jealous lover to wreak

instant vengeance for the supposed outrage upon his honour. He strikes

the prophetess to the earth, whereupon she thanks him with a smile for

having delivered her from an unbearable existence. At the sight of her

body Manfred realises that henceforth happiness has deserted him for

ever.

This theme I had adorned with many gorgeous scenes and complicated

situations, so that when I had worked it out I could regard it as a

fairly suitable, interesting, and effective whole, especially when

compared with other well-known subjects of a similar nature. Yet I

could never rouse myself to sufficient enthusiasm over it to give my

serious attention to its elaboration, especially as another theme now

laid its grip upon me. This was suggested to me by a pamphlet on the

‘Venusberg,’ which accidentally fell into my hands.

If all that I regarded as essentially German had hitherto drawn me with

ever-increasing force, and compelled me to its eager pursuit, I here

found it suddenly presented to me in the simple outlines of a legend,

based upon the old and well-known ballad of ‘Tannhäuser.’ True, its

elements were already familiar to me from Tieck’s version in his

Phantasus. But his conception of the subject had flung me back into the

fantastic regions created in my mind at an earlier period by Hoffmann,

and I should certainly never have been tempted to extract the framework

of a dramatic work from his elaborate story. The point in this popular

pamphlet which had so much weight with me was that it brought

‘Tannhäuser,’ if only by a passing hint, into touch with ‘The

Minstrel’s War on the Wartburg.’ I had some knowledge of this also from

Hoffmann’s account in his Serapionsbrudern. But I felt that the writer

had only grasped the old legend in a distorted form, and therefore

endeavoured to gain a closer acquaintance with the true aspect of this

attractive story. At this juncture Lehrs brought me the annual report

of the proceedings of the Königsberg German Society, in which the

‘Wartburg contest’ was criticised with a fair amount of detail by

Lukas. Here I also found the original text. Although I could utilise

but little of the real setting for my own purpose, yet the picture it

gave me of Germany in the Middle Ages was so suggestive that I found I

had not previously had the smallest conception of what it was like.

As a sequel to the Wartburg poem, I also found in the same copy a

critical study, ‘Lohengrin,’ which gave in full detail the main

contents of that widespread epic.

Thus a whole new world was opened to me, and though as yet I had not

found the form in which I might cope with Lohengrin, yet this image

also lived imperishably within me. When, therefore, I afterwards made a

close acquaintance with the intricacies of this legend, I could

visualise the figure of the hero with a distinctness equal to that of

my conception of Tannhäuser at this time.

Under these influences my longing for a speedy return to Germany grew

ever more intense, for there I hoped to earn a new home for myself

where I could enjoy leisure for creative work. But it was not yet

possible even to think of occupying myself with such grateful tasks.

The sordid necessities of life still bound me to Paris. While thus

employed, I found an opportunity of exerting myself in a way more

congenial to my desires. When I was a young man at Prague, I had made

the acquaintance of a Jewish musician and composer called Dessauer—a

man who was not devoid of talent, who in fact achieved a certain

reputation, but was chiefly known among his intimates on account of his

hypochondria. This man, who was now in flourishing circumstances, was

so far patronised by Schlesinger that the latter seriously proposed to

help him to a commission for Grand Opera. Dessauer had come across my

poem of the Fliegender Holländer, and now insisted that I should draft

a similar plot for him, as M. Leon Pillet’s Vaisseau Fantome had

already been given to M. Dietsch, the letter’s musical conductor, to

set to music. From this same conductor Dessauer obtained the promise of

a like commission, and he now offered me two hundred francs to provide

him with a similar plot, and one congenial to his hypochondriacal

temperament.

To meet this wish I ransacked my brain for recollections of Hoffmann,

and quickly decided to work up his Bergwerke von Falun. The moulding of

this fascinating and marvellous material succeeded as admirably as I

could wish. Dessauer also felt convinced that the topic was worth his

while to set to music. His dismay was accordingly all the greater when

Pillet rejected our plot on the ground that the staging would be too

difficult, and that the second act especially would entail

insurmountable obstacles for the ballet, which had to be given each

time. In place of this Dessauer wished me to compose him an oratorio on

‘Mary Magdalene.’ As on the day that he expressed this wish he appeared

to be suffering from acute melancholia, so much so that he declared he

had that morning seen his own head lying beside his bed, I thought well

not to refuse his request. I asked him, therefore, to give me time, and

I regret to say that ever since that day I have continued to take it..

It was amid such distractions as these that this winter at length drew

to an end, while my prospects of getting to Germany gradually grew more

hopeful, though with a slowness that sorely tried my patience. I had

kept up a continuous correspondence with Dresden respecting Rienzi, and

in the worthy chorus-master Fischer I at last found an honest man who

was favourably disposed to me. He sent me reliable and reassuring

reports as to the state of my affairs.

After receiving news, early in January, 1842, of renewed delay, I at

last heard that by the end of February the work would be ready for

performance. I was seriously uneasy at this, as I was afraid of not

being able to accomplish the journey by that date. But this news also

was soon contradicted, and the honest Fischer informed me that my opera

had had to be postponed till the autumn of that year. I realised fully

that it would never be performed if I could not be present in person at

Dresden. When eventually in March Count Redern, the director of the

Theatre Royal in Berlin, told me that my Fliegender Holländer had been

accepted for the opera there, I thought I had sufficient reason to

return to Germany at all costs as soon as possible.

I had already had various experiences as to the views of German

managers on this work. Relying on the plot, which had pleased the

manager of the Paris Opera so much, I had sent the libretto in the

first instance to my old acquaintance Ringelhardt, the director of the

Leipzig theatre. But the man had cherished an undisguised aversion for

me since my Liebesverbot. As he could not this time possibly object to

any levity in my subject, he now found fault with its gloomy solemnity

and refused to accept it. As I had met Councillor Küstner, at that time

manager of the Munich Court Theatre, when he was making arrangements

about La Reine de Chypre in Paris, I now sent him the text of the

Dutchman with a similar request. He, too, returned it, with the

assurance that it was not suited to German stage conditions, or to the

taste of the German public. As he had ordered a French libretto for

Munich, I knew what he meant. When the score was finished, I sent it to

Meyerbeer in Berlin, with a letter for Count Redern, and begged him, as

he had been unable to help me to anything in Paris, in spite of his

desire to do so, to be kind enough to use his influence in Berlin in

favour of my composition. I was genuinely astonished at the truly

prompt acceptance of my work two months later, which was accompanied by

very gratifying assurances from the Count, and I was delighted to see

in it a proof of Meyerbeer’s sincere and energetic intervention in my

favour. Strange to say, on my return to Germany soon afterwards, I was

destined to learn that Count Redern had long since retired from the

management of the Berlin Opera House, and that Küstner of Munich had

already been appointed his successor; the upshot of this was that Count

Redern’s consent, though very courteous, could not by any means be

taken seriously, as the realisation of it depended not on him but on

his successor. What the result was remains to be seen.

A circumstance that eventually facilitated my long-desired return to

Germany, which was now justified by my good prospects, was the tardily

awakened interest taken in my position by the wealthy members of my

family. If Didot had had reasons of his own for applying to the

Minister Villemain for support for Lehrs, so also Avenarius, my

brother-in-law in Paris, when he heard how I was struggling against

poverty, one day took it into his head to surprise me with some quite

unexpected help secured by his appeal to my sister Louisa. On 26th

December of the fast-waning year 1841 I went home to Minna carrying a

goose under my arm, and in the beak of the bird we found a

five-hundred-franc note. This note had been given me by Avenarius as

the result of a request on my behalf made by my sister Louisa to a

friend of hers, a wealthy merchant named Schletter. This welcome

addition to our extremely straitened resources might not in itself have

been sufficient to put me in an exceedingly good-humour, had I not

clearly seen in it the prospect of escaping altogether from my position

in Paris. As the leading German managers had now consented to the

performance of two of my compositions, I thought I might seriously

reproach my brother-in-law, Friedrich Brockhaus, who had repulsed me

the year before when I applied to him in great distress, on the ground

that he ‘disapproved of my profession.’ This time I might be more

successful in securing the wherewithal for my return. I was not

mistaken, and when the time came I was supplied from this source with

the necessary travelling expenses.

With these prospects, and my position thus improved, I found myself

spending the second half of the winter 1841-42 in high spirits, and

affording constant entertainment to the small circle of friends which

my relationship to Avenarius had created around me. Minna and I

frequently spent our evenings with this family and others, amongst whom

I have pleasant recollections of a certain Herr Kuhne, the head of a

private school, and his wife. I contributed so greatly to the success

of their little soirees, and was always so willing to improvise dances

on the piano for them to dance to, that I soon ran the risk of enjoying

an almost burdensome popularity.

At length the hour struck for my deliverance; the day came on which, as

I devoutly hoped, I might turn my back on Paris for ever. It was the

7th of April, and Paris was already gay with the first luxuriant

buddings of spring. In front of our windows, which all the winter had

looked upon a bleak and desolate garden, the trees were burgeoning, and

the birds sang. Our emotion at parting from our dear friends Anders,

Lehrs, and Kietz, however, was great, almost overwhelming. The first

seemed already doomed to an early death, for his health was exceedingly

bad, and he was advanced in years. About Lehrs’ condition, as I have

already said, there could no longer be any doubt, and it was dreadful,

after so short an experience as the two and a half years which I had

spent in Paris, to see the ravages that want had wrought among good,

noble, and sometimes even distinguished men. Kietz, for whose future I

was concerned, less on grounds of health than of morals, touched our

hearts once more by his boundless and almost childlike good-nature.

Fancying, for instance, that I might not have enough money for the

journey, he forced me, in spite of all resistance, to accept another

five-franc piece, which was about all that remained of his own fortune

at the moment: he also stuffed a packet of good French snuff for me

into the pocket of the coach, in which we at last rumbled through the

boulevards to the barriers, which we passed but were unable to see this

time, because our eyes were blinded with tears.

PART II

1842-1850

The journey from Paris to Dresden at that time took five days and

nights. On the German frontier, near Forbach, we met with stormy

weather and snow, a greeting which seemed inhospitable after the spring

we had already enjoyed in Paris. And, indeed, as we continued our

journey through our native land once more, we found much to dishearten

us, and I could not help thinking that the Frenchmen who on leaving

Germany breathed more freely on reaching French soil, and unbuttoned

their coats, as though passing from winter into summer, were not so

very foolish after all, seeing that we, for our part, were now

compelled to seek protection against this conspicuous change of

temperature by being very careful to put on sufficient clothing. The

unkindness of the elements became perfect torture when, later on,

between Frankfort and Leipzig, we were swept into the stream of

visitors to the Great Easter Fair.

The pressure on the mail-coaches was so great, that for two days and a

night, amid ceaseless storm, snow and rain, we were continually

changing from one wretched ‘substitute’ to another, thus turning our

journey into an adventure of almost the same type as our former voyage

at sea.

One solitary flash of brightness was afforded by our view of the

Wartburg, which we passed during the only sunlit hour of this journey.

The sight of this mountain fastness, which, from the Fulda side, is

clearly visible for a long time, affected me deeply. A neighbouring

ridge further on I at once christened the Horselberg, and as we drove

through the valley, pictured to myself the scenery for the third act of

my Tannhäuser. This scene remained so vividly in my mind, that long

afterwards I was able to give Desplechin, the Parisian scene-painter,

exact details when he was working out the scenery under my direction.

If I had already been impressed by the significance of the fact that my

first journey through the German Rhine district, so famous in legend,

should have been made on my way home from Paris, it seemed an even more

ominous coincidence that my first sight of Wartburg, which was so rich

in historical and mythical associations, should come just at this

moment. The view so warmed my heart against wind and weather, Jews and

the Leipzig Fair, that in the end I arrived, on 12th April, 1842, safe

and sound, with my poor, battered, half-frozen wife, in that selfsame

city of Dresden which I had last seen on the occasion of my sad

separation from my Minna, and my departure for my northern place of

exile.

We put up at the ‘Stadt Gotha’ inn. The city, in which such momentous

years of my childhood and boyhood had been spent, seemed cold and dead

beneath the influences of the wild, gloomy weather. Indeed, everything

there that could remind me of my youth seemed dead. No hospitable house

received us. We found my wife’s parents living in cramped and dingy

lodgings in very straitened circumstances, and were obliged at once to

look about for a small abode for ourselves. This we found in the

Topfergasse for twenty-one marks a month. After paying the necessary

business visits in connection with Rienzi, and making arrangements for

Minna during my brief absence, I set out on 15th April direct for

Leipzig, where I saw my mother and family for the first time in six

years.

During this period, which had been so eventful for my own life, my

mother had undergone a great change in her domestic position through

the death of Rosalie. She was living in a pleasant roomy flat near the

Brockhaus family, where she was free from all those household cares to

which, owing to her large family, she had devoted so many years of

anxious thought. Her bustling energy, which had almost amounted to

hardness, had entirely given place to a natural cheerfulness and

interest in the family prosperity of her married daughters. For the

blissful calm of this happy old age she was mainly indebted to the

affectionate care of her son-in-law, Friedrich Brockhaus, to whom I

expressed my heartfelt thanks for his goodness. She was exceedingly

astonished and pleased to see me unexpectedly enter her room. Any

bitterness that ever existed between us had utterly vanished, and her

only complaint was that she could not put me up in her house, instead

of my brother Julius, the unfortunate goldsmith, who had none of the

qualities that could make him a suitable companion for her. She was

full of hope for the success of my undertaking, and felt this

confidence strengthened by the favourable prophecy which our dear

Rosalie had made about me shortly before her sad death.

For the present, however, I only stayed a few days in Leipzig, as I had

first to visit Berlin in order to make definite arrangements with Count

Redern for the performance of the Fliegender Holländer. As I have

already observed, I was here at once destined to learn that the Count

was on the point of retiring from the directorship, and he accordingly

referred me for all further decisions to the new director, Küstner, who

had not yet arrived in Berlin. I now suddenly realised what this

strange circumstance meant, and knew that, so far as the Berlin

negotiations went, I might as well have remained in Paris. This

impression was in the main confirmed by a visit to Meyerbeer, who, I

found, regarded my coming to Berlin as over hasty. Nevertheless, he

behaved in a kind and friendly manner, only regretting that he was just

on the point of ‘going away,’ a state in which I always found him

whenever I visited him again in Berlin.

Mendelssohn was also in the capital about this time, having been

appointed one of the General Musical Directors to the King of Prussia.

I also sought him out, having been previously introduced to him in

Leipzig. He informed me that he did not believe his work would prosper

in Berlin, and that he would rather go back to Leipzig. I made no

inquiry about the fate of the score of my great symphony performed at

Leipzig in earlier days, which I had more or less forced upon him so

many years ago. On the other hand, he did not betray to me any signs of

remembering that strange offering. In the midst of the lavish comforts

of his home he struck me as cold, yet it was not so much that he

repelled me as that I recoiled from him. I also paid a visit to

Rellstab, to whom I had a letter of introduction from his trusty

publisher, my brother-in-law Brockhaus. Here it was not so much smug

ease that I encountered; I doubtless felt repulsed more by the fact

that he showed no inclination whatever to interest himself in my

affairs.

I grew very low spirited in Berlin. I could almost have wished

Commissioner Cerf back again. Miserable as had been the time I had

spent here years before, I had then, at any rate, met one man, who, for

all the bluntness of his exterior, had treated me with true

friendliness and consideration. In vain did I try to call to mind the

Berlin through whose streets I had walked, with all the ardour of

youth, by the side of Laube. After my acquaintance with London, and

still more with Paris, this city, with its sordid spaces and

pretensions to greatness, depressed me deeply, and I breathed a hope

that, should no luck crown my life, it might at least be spent in Paris

rather than in Berlin.

On my return from this wholly fruitless expedition, I first went to

Leipzig for a few days, where, on this occasion, I stayed with my

brother-in-law, Hermann Brockhaus, who was now Professor of Oriental

Languages at the University. His family had been increased by the birth

of two daughters, and the atmosphere of unruffled content, illuminated

by mental activity and a quiet but vivid interest in all things

relating to the higher aspects of life, greatly moved my homeless and

vagabond soul. One evening, after my sister had seen to her children,

whom she had brought up very well, and had sent them with gentle words

to bed, we gathered in the large richly stocked library for our evening

meal and a long confidential chat. Here I broke out into a violent fit

of weeping, and it seemed as though the tender sister, who five years

before had known me during the bitterest straits of my early married

life in Dresden, now really understood me. At the express suggestion of

my brother-in-law Hermann, my family tendered me a loan, to help me to

tide over the time of waiting for the performance of my Rienzi in

Dresden. This, they said, they regarded merely as a duty, and assured

me that I need have no hesitation whatever in accepting it. It

consisted of a sum of six hundred marks, which was to be paid me in

monthly instalments for six months. As I had no prospect of being able

to reply on any other source of income, there was every chance of

Minna’s talent for management being put severely to the test, if this

were to carry us through; it could be done, however, and I was able to

return to Dresden with a great sense of relief.

While I was staying with my relatives I played and sang them the

Fliegender Holländer for the first time connectedly, and seemed to

arouse considerable interest by my performance, for when, later on, my

sister Louisa heard the opera in Dresden, she complained that much of

the effect previously produced by my rendering did not come back to

her. I also sought out my old friend Apel again. The poor man had gone

stone blind, but he astonished me by his cheeriness and contentment,

and thereby once and for all deprived me of any reason for pitying him.

As he declared that he knew the blue coat I was wearing very well,

though it was really a brown one, I thought it best not to argue the

point, and I left Leipzig in a state of wonder at finding every one

there so happy and contented.

When I reached Dresden, on 26th April, I found occasion to grapple more

vigorously with my lot. Here I was enlivened by closer intercourse with

the people on whom I had to rely for a successful production of Rienzi.

It is true that the results of my interviews with Lüttichau, the

general manager, and Reissiger, the musical conductor, left me cold and

incredulous. Both were sincerely astonished at my arrival in Dresden;

and the same might even be said of my frequent correspondent and

patron, Hofrath Winkler, who also would have preferred my remaining in

Paris. But, as has been my constant experience both before and since,

help and encouragement have always come to me from humbler and never

from the more exalted ranks of life.

So in this case, too, I met my first agreeable sensation in the

overwhelmingly cordial reception I received from the old chorus-master,

Wilhelm Fischer. I had had no previous acquaintance with him, yet he

was the only person who had taken the trouble to read my score

carefully, and had not only conceived serious hopes for the success of

my opera, but had worked energetically to secure its being accepted and

practised. The moment I entered his room and told him my name, he

rushed to embrace me with a loud cry, and in a second I was translated

to an atmosphere of hope. Besides this man, I met in the actor

Ferdinand Heine and his family another sure foundation for hearty and,

indeed, deep-rooted friendship. It is true that I had known him from

childhood, for at that time he was one of the few young people whom my

stepfather Geyer liked to see about him. In addition to a fairly

decided talent for drawing, it was chiefly his pleasant social gifts

that had won him an entrance into our more intimate family circle. As

he was very small and slight, my stepfather nicknamed him DavidCHEN,

and under this appellation he used to take part with great affability

and good-humour in our little festivities, and above all in our

friendly excursions into the neighbouring country, in which, as I

mentioned in its place, even Carl Maria von Weber used to join.

Belonging to the good old school, he had become a useful, if not

prominent, member of the Dresden stage. He possessed all the knowledge

and qualities for a good stage manager, but never succeeded in inducing

the committee to give him that appointment. It was only as a designer

of costumes that he found further scope for his talents, and in this

capacity he was included in the consultations over the staging of

Rienzi.

Thus it came about that he had the opportunity of busying himself with

the work of a member, now grown to man’s estate, of the very family

with whom he had spent such pleasant days in his youth. He greeted me

at once as a child of the house, and we two homeless creatures found in

our memories of this long-lost home the first common basis to our

friendship. We generally spent our evenings with old Fischer at

Heine’s, where, amid hopeful conversation, we regaled ourselves on

potatoes and herrings, of which the meal chiefly consisted.

Schroder-Devrient was away on a holiday; Tichatschek, who was also on

the point of going away, I had just time to see, and with him I went

quickly through a part of his role in Rienzi. His brisk and lively

nature, his glorious voice and great musical talent, gave special

weight to his encouraging assurance that he delighted in the role of

Rienzi. Heine also told me that the mere prospect of having many new

costumes, and especially new silver armour, had inspired Tichatschek

with the liveliest desire to play this part, so that I might rely on

him under any circumstances. Thus I could at once give closer attention

to the preparations for practice, which was fixed to begin in the late

summer, after the principal singers had returned from their holiday.

I had to make special efforts to pacify my friend Fischer by my

readiness to abbreviate the score, which was excessively lengthy. His

intentions in the matter were so honest that I gladly sat down with him

to the wearisome task. I played and sang my score to the astonished man

on an old grand piano in the rehearsing-room of the Court Theatre, with

such frantic vigour that, although he did not mind if the instrument

came to grief, he grew concerned about my chest. Finally, amid hearty

laughter, he ceased to argue about cutting down passages, as precisely

where he thought something might be omitted I proved to him with

headlong eloquence that it was precisely here that the main point lay.

He plunged with me head over heels into the vast chaos of sound,

against which he could raise no objection, beyond the testimony of his

watch, whose correctness I also ended by disputing. As sops I

light-heartedly flung him the big pantomime and most of the ballet in

the second act, whereby I reckoned we might save a whole half-hour.

Thus, thank goodness, the whole monster was at last handed over to the

clerks to make a fair copy of, and the rest was left for time to

accomplish.

We next discussed what we should do in the summer, and I decided upon a

stay of several months at Toplitz, the scene of my first youthful

flights, whose fine air and baths, I hoped, would also benefit Minna’s

health. But before we could carry out this intention I had to pay

several more visits to Leipzig to settle the fate of my Dutchman. On

5th May I proceeded thither to have an interview with Küstner, the new

director of the Berlin Opera, who I had been told had just arrived

there. He was now placed in the awkward position of being about to

produce in Berlin the very opera which he had before declined in

Munich, as it had been accepted by his predecessor in office. He

promised me to consider what steps he would take in this predicament.

In order to learn the result of Küstner’s deliberations, I determined,

on 2nd June, to seek him out, and this time in Berlin itself. But at

Leipzig I found a letter in which he begged me to wait patiently a

little longer for his final verdict. I took advantage of being in the

neighbourhood of Halle to pay a visit to my eldest brother Albert. I

was very much grieved and depressed to find the poor fellow, whom I

must give the credit of having the greatest perseverance and a quite

remarkable talent for dramatic song, living in the unworthy and mean

circumstances which the Halle Theatre offered to him and his family.

The realisation of conditions into which I myself had once nearly sunk

now filled me with indescribable abhorrence. Still more harrowing was

it to hear my brother speak of this state in tones which showed, alas,

only too plainly, the hopeless submission with which he had already

resigned himself to its horrors. The only consolation I could find was

the personality and childlike nature of his step-daughter Johanna, who

was then fifteen, and who sang me Spohr’s Rose, wie bist du so schon

with great expression and in a voice of an extraordinarily beautiful

quality.

Then I returned to Dresden, and at last, in wonderful weather,

undertook the pleasant journey to Toplitz with Minna and one of her

sisters, reaching that place on 9th June, where we took up our quarters

at a second-class inn, the Eiche, at Schonau. Here we were soon joined

by my mother, who paid her usual yearly visit to the warm baths all the

more gladly this time because she knew she would find me there. If she

had before had any prejudice against Minna because of my premature

marriage to her, a closer acquaintance with her domestic gifts soon

changed it into respect, and she quickly learned to love the partner of

my doleful days in Paris. Although my mother’s vagaries demanded no

small consideration, yet what particularly delighted me about her was

the astonishing vivacity of her almost childlike imagination, a faculty

she retained to such a degree that one morning she complained that my

relation of the Tannhäuser legend on the previous evening had given her

a whole night of pleasant but most tiring sleeplessness.

By dint of appealing letters to Schletter, a wealthy patron of art in

Leipzig, I managed to do something for Kietz, who, had remained behind

in misery in Paris, and also to provide Minna with medical treatment. I

also succeeded to a certain extent in ameliorating my own woeful

financial position. Scarcely were these tasks accomplished, when I

started off in my old boyish way on a ramble of several days on foot

through the Bohemian mountains, in order that I might mentally work out

my plan of the ‘Venusberg’ amid the pleasant associations of such a

trip. Here I took the fancy of engaging quarters in Aussig on the

romantic Schreckenstein, where for several days I occupied the little

public room, in which straw was laid down for me to sleep on at night.

I found recreation in daily ascents of the Wostrai, the highest peak in

the neighbourhood, and so keenly did the fantastic solitude quicken my

youthful spirit, that I clambered about the ruins of the Schreckenstein

the whole of one moonlit night, wrapped only in a blanket, in order

myself to provide the ghost that was lacking, and delighted myself with

the hope of scaring some passing wayfarer.

Here I drew up in my pocket-book the detailed plan of a three-act opera

on the ‘Venusberg,’ and subsequently carried out the composition of

this work in strict accordance with the sketch I then made.

One day, when climbing the Wostrai, I was astonished, on turning the

corner of a valley, to hear a merry dance tune whistled by a goatherd

perched up on a crag. I seemed immediately to stand among the chorus of

pilgrims filing past the goatherd in the valley; but I could not

afterwards recall the goatherd’s tune, so I was obliged to help myself

out of the matter in the usual way.

Enriched by these spoils, I returned to Toplitz in a wonderfully

cheerful frame of mind and robust health, but on receiving the

interesting news that Tichatschek and Schroder-Devrient were on the

point of returning, I was impelled to set off once more for Dresden. I

took this step, not so much to avoid missing any of the early

rehearsals of Rienzi, as because I wanted to prevent the management

replacing it by something else. I left Minna for a time with my mother,

and reached Dresden on 18th July.

I hired a small lodging in a queer house, since pulled down, facing the

Maximilian Avenue, and entered into a fairly lively intercourse with

our operatic stars who had just returned. My old enthusiasm for

Schroder-Devrient revived when I saw her again more frequently in

opera. Strange was the effect produced upon me when I heard her for the

first time in Gretry’s Blaubart, for I could not help remembering that

this was the first opera I had ever seen. I had been taken to it as a

boy of five (also in Dresden), and I still retained my wondrous first

impressions of it. All my earliest childish memories were revived, and

I recollected how frequently and with what emphasis I had myself sung

Bluebeard’s song: Ha, die Falsche! Die Thure offen! to the amusement of

the whole house, with a paper helmet of my own making on my head. My

friend Heine still remembered it well.

In other respects the operatic performances were not such as to impress

me very favourably: I particularly missed the rolling sound of the

fully equipped Parisian orchestra of string instruments. I also noticed

that, when opening the fine new theatre, they had quite forgotten to

increase the number of these instruments in proportion to the enlarged

space. In this, as well as in the general equipment of the stage, which

was materially deficient in many respects, I was impressed by the sense

of a certain meanness about theatrical enterprise in Germany, which

became most noticeable when reproductions were given, often with

wretched translations of the text, of the Paris opera repertoire. If

even in Paris my dissatisfaction with this treatment of opera had been

great, the feeling which once drove me thither from the German theatres

now returned with redoubled energy. I actually felt degraded again, and

nourished within my breast a contempt so deep that for a time I could

hardly endure the thought of signing a lasting contract, even with one

of the most up-to-date of German opera houses, but sadly wondered what

steps I could take to hold my ground between disgust and desire in this

strange world.

Nothing but the sympathy inspired by communion with persons endowed

with exceptional gifts enabled me to triumph over my scruples. This

statement applies above all to my great ideal, Schroder-Devrient, in

whose artistic triumphs it had once been my most burning desire to be

associated. It is true that many years had elapsed since my first

youthful impressions of her were formed. As regards her looks, the

verdict which, in the following winter, was sent to Paris by Berlioz

during his stay in Dresden, was so far correct that her somewhat

‘maternal’ stoutness was unsuited to youthful parts, especially in male

attire, which, as in Rienzi, made too great a demand upon the

imagination. Her voice, which in point of quality had never been an

exceptionally good medium for song, often landed her in difficulties,

and in particular she was forced, when singing, to drag the time a

little all through. But her achievements were less hampered now by

these material hindrances than by the fact that her repertoire

consisted of a limited number of leading parts, which she had sung so

frequently that a certain monotony in the conscious calculation of

effect often developed into a mannerism which, from her tendency to

exaggeration, was at times almost painful.

Although these defects could not escape me, yet I, more than any one,

was especially qualified to overlook such minor weaknesses, and realise

with enthusiasm the incomparable greatness of her performances. Indeed,

it only needed the stimulus of excitement, which this actress’s

exceptionally eventful life still procured, fully to restore the

creative power of her prime, a fact of which I was subsequently to

receive striking demonstrations. But I was seriously troubled and

depressed at seeing how strong was the disintegrating effect of

theatrical life upon the character of this singer, who had originally

been endowed with such great and noble qualities. From the very mouth

through which the great actress’s inspired musical utterances reached

me, I was compelled to hear at other times very similar language to

that in which, with but few exceptions, nearly all heroines of the

stage indulge. The possession of a naturally fine voice, or even mere

physical advantages, which might place her rivals on the same footing

as herself in public favour, was more than she could endure; and so far

was she from acquiring the dignified resignation worthy of a great

artist, that her jealousy increased to a painful extent as years went

on. I noticed this all the more because I had reason to suffer from it.

A fact which caused me even greater trouble, however, was that she did

not grasp music easily, and the study of a new part involved

difficulties which meant many a painful hour for the composer who had

to make her master his work. Her difficulty in learning new parts, and

particularly that of Adriano in Rienzi, entailed disappointments for

her which caused me a good deal of trouble.

If, in her case, I had to handle a great and sensitive nature very

tenderly, I had, on the other hand, a very easy task with Tichatschek,

with his childish limitations and superficial, but exceptionally

brilliant, talents. He did not trouble to learn his parts by heart, as

he was so musical that he could sing the most difficult music at sight,

and thought all further study needless, whereas with most other singers

the work consisted in mastering the score. Hence, if he sang through a

part at rehearsals often enough to impress it on his memory, the rest,

that is to say, everything pertaining to vocal art and dramatic

delivery, would follow naturally. In this way he picked up any clerical

errors there might be in the libretto, and that with such incorrigible

pertinacity, that he uttered the wrong words with just the same

expression as if they were correct. He waved aside good-humouredly any

expostulations or hints as to the sense with the remark, ‘Ah! that will

be all right soon.’ And, in fact, I very soon resigned myself and quite

gave up trying to get the singer to use his intelligence in the

interpretation of the part of the hero, for which I was very agreeably

compensated by the light-hearted enthusiasm with which he flung himself

into his congenial role, and the irresistible effect of his brilliant

voice.

With the exception of these two actors who played the leading parts, I

had only very moderate material at my disposal. But there was plenty of

goodwill, and I had recourse to an ingenious device to induce Reissiger

the conductor to hold frequent piano rehearsals. He had complained to

me of the difficulty he had always found in securing a well-written

libretto, and thought it was very sensible of me to have acquired the

habit of writing my own. In his youth he had unfortunately neglected to

do this for himself, and yet this was all he lacked to make a

successful dramatic composer. I feel bound to confess that he possessed

‘a good deal of melody’; but this, he added, did not seem sufficient to

inspire the singers with the requisite enthusiasm. His experience was

that Schroder-Devrient, in his Adele de Foix, would render very

indifferently the same final passage with which, in Bellini’s Romeo and

Juliet, she would put the audience into an ecstasy. The reason for

this, he presumed, must lie in the subject-matter. I at once promised

him that I would supply him with a libretto in which he would be able

to introduce these and similar melodies to the greatest advantage. To

this he gladly agreed, and I therefore set aside for versification, as

a suitable text for Reissiger, my Hohe Braut, founded on Konig’s

romance, which I had once before submitted to Scribe. I promised to

bring Reissiger a page of verse for every piano rehearsal, and this I

faithfully did until the whole book was done. I was much surprised to

learn some time later that Reissiger had had a new libretto written for

him by an actor named Kriethe. This was called the Wreck of the Medusa.

I then learned that the wife of the conductor, who was a suspicious

woman, had been filled with the greatest concern at my readiness to

give up a libretto to her husband. They both thought the book was good

and full of striking effects, but they suspected some sort of trap in

the background, to escape from which they must certainly exercise the

greatest caution. The result was that I regained possession of my

libretto and was able, later on, to help my old friend Kittl with it in

Prague; he set it to music of his own, and entitled it Die Franzosen

vor Nizza. I heard that it was frequently performed in Prague with

great success, though I never saw it myself; and I was also told at the

same time by a local critic that this text was a proof of my real

aptitude as a librettist, and that it was a mistake for me to devote

myself to composition. As regards my Tannhäuser, on the other hand,

Laube used to declare it was a misfortune that I had not got an

experienced dramatist to supply me with a decent text for my music.

For the time being, however, this work of versification had the desired

result, and Reissiger kept steadily to the study of Rienzi. But what

encouraged him even more than my verses was the growing interest of the

singers, and above all the genuine enthusiasm of Tichatschek. This man,

who had been so ready to leave the delights of the theatre piano for a

shooting party, now looked upon the rehearsals of Rienzi as a genuine

treat. He always attended them with radiant eyes and boisterous

good-humour. I soon felt myself in a state of constant exhilaration:

favourite passages were greeted with acclamation by the singers at

every rehearsal, and a concerted number of the third finale, which

unfortunately had afterwards to be omitted owing to its length,

actually became on that occasion a source of profit to me. For

Tichatschek maintained that this B minor was so lovely that something

ought to be paid for it every time, and he put down a silver penny,

inviting the others to do the same, to which they all responded

merrily. From that day forward, whenever we came to this passage at

rehearsals, the cry was raised, ‘Here comes the silver penny part,’ and

Schroder-Devrient, as she took out her purse, remarked that these

rehearsals would ruin her. This gratuity was conscientiously handed to

me each time, and no one suspected that these contributions, which were

given as a joke, were often a very welcome help towards defraying the

cost of our daily food. For Minna had returned from Toplitz, at the

beginning of August, accompanied by my mother.

We lived very frugally in chilly lodgings, hopefully awaiting the tardy

day of our deliverance. The months of August and September passed, in

preparation for my work, amid frequent disturbances caused by the

fluctuating and scanty repertoire of a German opera house, and not

until October did the combined rehearsals assume such a character as to

promise the certainty of a speedy production. From the very beginning

of the general rehearsals with the orchestra we all shared the

conviction that the opera would, without doubt, be a great success.

Finally, the full dress rehearsals produced a perfectly intoxicating

effect. When we tried the first scene of the second act with the

scenery complete, and the messengers of peace entered, there was a

general outburst of emotion, and even Schroder-Devrient, who was

bitterly prejudiced against her part, as it was not the role of the

heroine, could only answer my questions in a voice stifled with tears.

I believe the whole theatrical body, down to its humblest officials,

loved me as though I were a real prodigy, and I am probably not far

wrong in saying that much of this arose from sympathy and lively

fellow-feeling for a young man, whose exceptional difficulties were not

unknown to them, and who now suddenly stepped out of perfect obscurity

into splendour. During the interval at the full dress rehearsal, while

other members had dispersed to revive their jaded nerves with lunch, I

remained seated on a pile of boards on the stage, in order that no one

might realise that I was in the quandary of being unable to obtain

similar refreshment. An invalid Italian singer, who was taking a small

part in the opera, seemed to notice this, and kindly brought me a glass

of wine and a piece of bread. I was sorry that I was obliged to deprive

him of even his small part in the course of the year, for its loss

provoked such ill-treatment from his wife, that by conjugal tyranny he

was driven into the ranks of my enemies. When, after my flight from

Dresden in 1849, I learned that I had been denounced to the police by

this same singer for supposed complicity in the rising which took place

in that town, I bethought me of this breakfast during the Rienzi

rehearsal, and felt I was being punished for my ingratitude, for I knew

I was guilty of having brought him into trouble with his wife.

The frame of mind in which I looked forward to the first performance of

my work was a unique experience which I have never felt either before

or since. My kind sister Clara fully shared my feelings. She had been

living a wretched middle-class life at Chemnitz, which, just about this

time, she had left to come and share my fate in Dresden. The poor

woman, whose undoubted artistic gifts had faded so early, was

laboriously dragging out a commonplace bourgeois existence as a wife

and mother; but now, under the influence of my growing success, she

began joyously to breathe a new life. She and I and the worthy

chorus-master Fischer used to spend our evenings with the Heine family,

still over potatoes and herrings, and often in a wonderfully elated

frame of mind. The evening before our first performance I was able to

crown our happiness by myself ladling out a bowl of punch. With mingled

tears and laughter we skipped about like happy children, and then in

sleep prepared ourselves for the triumphant day to which we looked

forward with such confidence..

Although on the morning of 20th October, 1842 I had resolved not to

disturb any of my singers by a visit, yet I happened to come across one

of them, a stiff Philistine called Risse, who was playing a minor bass

part in a dull but respectable way. The day was rather cool, but

wonderfully bright and sunshiny, after the gloomy weather we had just

been having. Without a word this curious creature saluted me and then

remained standing, as though bewitched. He simply gazed into my face

with wonder and rapture, in order to find out, so he at last managed to

tell me in strange confusion, how a man looked who that very day was to

face such an exceptional fate. I smiled and reflected that it was

indeed a day of crisis, and promised him that I would soon drink a

glass with him, at the Stadt Hamburg inn, of the excellent wine he had

recommended to me with so much agitation.

No subsequent experience of mine can be compared with the sensations

which marked the day of the first production of Rienzi. At all the

first performances of my works in later days, I have been so absorbed

by an only too well-founded anxiety as to their success, that I could

neither enjoy the opera nor form any real estimate of its reception by

the public. As for my subsequent experiences at the general rehearsal

of Tristan und Isolde, this took place under such exceptional

circumstances, and its effect upon me differed so fundamentally from

that produced by the first performance of Rienzi, that no comparison

can possibly be drawn between the two.

The immediate success of Rienzi was no doubt assured beforehand. But

the emphatic way in which the audience declared their appreciation was

thus far exceptional, that in cities like Dresden the spectators are

never in a position to decide conclusively upon a work of importance on

the first night, and consequently assume an attitude of chilling

restraint towards the works of unknown authors. But this was, in the

nature of things, an exceptional case, for the numerous staff of the

theatre and the body of musicians had inundated the city beforehand

with such glowing reports of my opera, that the whole population

awaited the promised miracle in feverish expectation. I sat with Minna,

my sister Clara, and the Heine family in a pit-box, and when I try to

recall my condition during that evening, I can only picture it with all

the paraphernalia of a dream. Of real pleasure or agitation I felt none

at all: I seemed to stand quite aloof from my work; whereas the sight

of the thickly crowded auditorium agitated me so much, that I was

unable even to glance at the body of the audience, whose presence

merely affected me like some natural phenomenon—something like a

continuous downpour of rain—from which I sought shelter in the farthest

corner of my box as under a protecting roof. I was quite unconscious of

applause, and when at the end of the acts I was tempestuously called

for, I had every time to be forcibly reminded by Heine and driven on to

the stage. On the other hand, one great anxiety filled me with growing

alarm: I noticed that the first two acts had taken as long as the whole

of Freischutz, for instance. On account of its warlike calls to arms

the third act begins with an exceptional uproar, and when at its close

the clock pointed to ten, which meant that the performance had already

lasted full four hours, I became perfectly desperate. The fact that

after this act, also, I was again loudly called, I regarded merely as a

final courtesy on the part of the audience, who wished to signify that

they had had quite enough for one evening, and would now leave the

house in a body. As we had still two acts before us, I thought it

settled that we should not be able to finish the piece, and apologised

for my lack of wisdom in not having previously effected the necessary

curtailments. Now, thanks to my folly, I found myself in the unheard-of

predicament of being unable to finish an opera, otherwise extremely

well received, simply because it was absurdly long. I could only

explain the undiminished zeal of the singers, and particularly of

Tichatschek, who seemed to grow lustier and cheerier the longer it

lasted, as an amiable trick to conceal from me the inevitable

catastrophe. But my astonishment at finding the audience still there in

full muster, even in the last act—towards midnight—filled me with

imbounded perplexity. I could no longer trust my eyes or ears, and

regarded the whole events of the evening as a nightmare. It was past

midnight when, for the last time, I had to obey the thunderous calls of

the audience, side by side with my trusty singers.

My feeling of desperation at the unparalleled length of my opera was

augmented by the temper of my relatives, whom I saw for a short time

after the performance. Friedrich Brockhaus and his family had come over

with some friends from Leipzig, and had invited us to the inn, hoping

to celebrate an agreeable success over a pleasant supper, and possibly

to drink my health. But on arriving, kitchen and cellar were closed,

and every one was so worn out that nothing was to be heard but outcries

at the unparalleled case of an opera lasting from six o’clock till past

twelve. No further remarks were exchanged, and we stole away feeling

quite stupefied.

About eight the next morning I put in an appearance at the clerks’

office, in order that in case there should be a second performance I

might arrange the necessary curtailment of the parts. If, during the

previous summer, I had contested every beat with the faithful

chorus-master Fischer, and proved them all to be indispensable, I was

now possessed by a blind rage for striking out. There was not a single

part of my score which seemed any longer necessary—what the audience

had been made to swallow the previous evening now appeared but a chaos

of sheer impossibilities, each and all of which might be omitted

without the slightest damage or risk of being unintelligible. My one

thought now was how to reduce my convolution of monstrosities to decent

limits. By dint of unsparing and ruthless abbreviations handed over to

the copyist, I hoped to avert a catastrophe, for I expected nothing

less than that the general manager, together with the city and the

theatre, would that very day give me to understand that such a thing as

the performance of my Last of the Tribunes might perhaps be permitted

once as a curiosity, but not oftener. All day long, therefore, I

carefully avoided going near the theatre, so as to give time for my

heroic abbreviations to do their salutary work, and for news of them to

spread through the city. But at midday I looked in again upon the

copyists, to assure myself that all had been duly performed as I had

ordered. I then learned that Tichatschek had also been there, and,

after inspecting the omissions that I had arranged, had forbidden their

being carried out. Fischer, the chorus-master, also wished to speak to

me about them: work was suspended, and I foresaw great confusion. I

could not understand what it all meant, and feared mischief if the

arduous task were delayed. At length, towards evening, I sought out

Tichatschek at the theatre. Without giving him a chance to speak, I

brusquely asked him why he had interrupted the copyists’ work. In a

half-choked voice he curtly and defiantly rejoined, ‘I will have none

of my part cut out—it is too heavenly.’ I stared at him blankly, and

then felt as though I had been suddenly bewitched: such an unheard-of

testimony to my success could not but shake me out of my strange

anxiety. Others joined him, Fischer radiant with delight and bubbling

with laughter. Every one spoke of the enthusiastic emotion which

thrilled the whole city. Next came a letter of thanks from the

Commissioner acknowledging my splendid work. Nothing now remained for

me but to embrace Tichatschek and Fischer, and go on my way to inform

Minna and Clara how matters stood.

After a few days’ rest for the actors, the second performance took

place on 26th October, but with various curtailments, for which I had

great difficulty in obtaining Tichatschek’s consent. Although it was

still of much more than average length, I heard no particular

complaints, and at last adopted Tichatschek’s view that, if he could

stand it, so could the audience. For six performances therefore, all of

which continued to receive a similar avalanche of applause, I let the

matter run its course.

My opera, however, had also excited interest among the elder princesses

of the royal family. They thought its exhausting length a drawback, but

were nevertheless unwilling to miss any of it. Lüttichau consequently

proposed that I should give the piece at full length, but half of it at

a time on two successive evenings. This suited me very well, and after

an interval of a few weeks we announced Rienzi’s Greatness for the

first day, and His Fall for the second. The first evening we gave two

acts, and on the second three, and for the latter I composed a special

introductory prelude. This met with the entire approval of our august

patrons, and especially of the two eldest, Princesses Amalie and

Augusta. The public, on the contrary, simply regarded this in the light

of now being asked to pay two entrance fees for one opera, and

pronounced the new arrangement a decided fraud. Its annoyance at the

change was so great that it actually threatened to be fatal to the

attendance, and after three performances of the divided Rienzi the

management was obliged to go back to the old arrangement, which I

willingly made possible by introducing my cuttings again.

From this time forward the piece used to fill the house to overflowing

as often as it could be presented, and the permanence of its success

became still more obvious when I began to realise the envy it drew upon

me from many different quarters. My first experience of this was truly

painful, and came from the hands of the poet, Julius Mosen, on the very

day after the first performance. When I first reached Dresden in the

summer I had sought him out, and, having a really high opinion of his

talent, our intercourse soon became more intimate, and was the means of

giving me much pleasure and instruction. He had shown me a volume of

his plays, which on the whole appealed to me exceptionally. Among these

was a tragedy, Cola Rienzi, dealing with the same subject as my opera,

and in a manner partly new to me, and which I thought effective. With

reference to this poem, I had begged him to take no notice of my

libretto, as in the quality of its poetry it could not possibly bear

comparison with his own; and it cost him little sacrifice to grant the

request. It happened that just before the first performance of my

Rienzi, he had produced in Dresden Bernhard von Weimar, one of his

least happy pieces, the result of which had brought him little

pleasure. Dramatically it was a thing with no life in it, aiming only

at political harangue, and had shared the inevitable fate of all such

aberrations. He had therefore awaited the appearance of my Rienzi with

some vexation, and confessed to me his bitter chagrin at not being able

to procure the acceptance of his tragedy of the same name in Dresden.

This, he presumed, arose from its somewhat pronounced political

tendency, which, certainly in a spoken play on a similar subject, would

be more noticeable than in an opera, where from the very start no one

pays any heed to the words. I had genially confirmed him in this

depreciation of the subject matter in opera; and was therefore the more

startled when, on finding him at my sister Louisa’s the day after the

first performance, he straightway overwhelmed me with a scornful

outburst of irritation at my success. But he found in me a strange

sense of the essential unreality in opera of such a subject as that

which I had just illustrated with so much success in Rienzi, so that,

oppressed by a secret sense of shame, I had no serious rejoinder to

offer to his candidly poisonous abuse. My line of defence was not yet

sufficiently clear in my own mind to be available offhand, nor was it

yet backed by so obvious a product of my own peculiar genius that I

could venture to quote it. Moreover, my first impulse was only one of

pity for the unlucky playwright, which I felt all the more constrained

to express, because his burst of fury gave me the inward satisfaction

of knowing that he recognised my great success, of which I was not yet

quite clear myself.

But this first performance of Rienzi did far more than this. It gave

occasion for controversy, and made an ever-widening breach between

myself and the newspaper critics. Herr Karl Bank, who for some time had

been the chief musical critic in Dresden, had been known to me before

at Magdeburg, where he once visited me and listened with delight to my

playing of several fairly long passages from my Liebesverbot. When we

met again in Dresden, this man could not forgive me for having been

unable to procure him tickets for the first performance of Rienzi. The

same thing happened with a certain Herr Julius Schladebach, who

likewise settled in Dresden about that time as a critic. Though I was

always anxious to be gracious to everybody, yet I felt just then an

invincible repugnance for showing special deference to any man because

he was a critic. As time went on, I carried this rule to the point of

almost systematic rudeness, and was consequently all my life through

the victim of unprecedented persecution from the press. As yet,

however, this ill-will had not become pronounced, for at that time

journalism had not begun to give itself airs in Dresden. There were so

few contributions sent from there to the outside press that our

artistic doings excited very little notice elsewhere, a fact which was

certainly not without its disadvantages for me. Thus for the present

the unpleasant side of my success scarcely affected me at all, and for

a brief space I felt myself, for the first and only time in my life, so

pleasantly borne along on the breath of general good-will, that all my

former troubles seemed amply requited.

For further and quite unexpected fruits of my success now appeared with

astonishing rapidity, though not so much in the form of material

profit, which for the present resolved itself into nine hundred marks,

paid me by the General Board as an exceptional fee instead of the usual

twenty golden louis. Nor did I dare to cherish the hope of selling my

work advantageously to a publisher, until it had been performed in some

other important towns. But fate willed it, that by the sudden death of

Rastrelli, royal director of music, which occurred shortly after the

first production of Rienzi, an office should unexpectedly become

vacant, for the filling of which all eyes at once turned to me.

While the negotiations over this matter were slowly proceeding, the

General Board gave proof in another direction of an almost passionate

interest in my talents. They insisted that the first performance of the

Fliegender Holländer should on no account be conceded to the Berlin

opera, but reserved as an honour for Dresden. As the Berlin authorities

raised no obstacle, I very gladly handed over my latest work also to

the Dresden theatre. If in this I had to dispense with Tichatschek’s

assistance, as there was no leading tenor part in the play, I could

count all the more surely on the helpful co-operation of

Schroder-Devrient, to whom a worthier task was assigned in the leading

female part than that which she had had in Rienzi. I was glad to be

able thus to rely entirely upon her, as she had grown strangely out of

humour with me, owing to her scanty share in the success of Rienzi. The

completeness of my faith in her I proved with an exaggeration by no

means advantageous to my own work, by simply forcing the leading male

part on Wachter, a once capable, but now somewhat delicate baritone. He

was in every respect wholly unsuited to the task, and only accepted it

with unfeigned hesitation. On submitting my play to my adored prima

donna, I was much relieved to find that its poetry made a special

appeal to her. Thanks to the genuine personal interest awakened in me

under very peculiar circumstances by the character and fate of this

exceptional woman, our study of the part of Senta, which often brought

us into close contact, became one of the most thrilling and momentously

instructive periods of my life.

It is true that the great actress, especially when under the influence

of her famous mother, Sophie Schroder, who was just then with her on a

visit, showed undisguised vexation at my having composed so brilliant a

work as Rienzi for Dresden without having specifically reserved the

principal part for her. Yet the magnanimity of her disposition

triumphed even over this selfish impulse: she loudly proclaimed me ‘a

genius,’ and honoured me with that special confidence which, she said,

none but a genius should enjoy. But when she invited me to become both

the accomplice and adviser in her really dreadful love affairs, this

confidence certainly began to have its risky side; nevertheless there

were at first occasions on which she openly proclaimed herself before

all the world as my friend, making most flattering distinctions in my

favour.

First of all I had to accompany her on a trip to Leipzig, where she was

giving a concert for her mother’s benefit, which she thought to make

particularly attractive by including in its programme two selections

from Rienzi—the aria of Adriano and the hero’s prayer (the latter sung

by Tichatschek), and both under my personal conductorship. Mendelssohn,

who was also on very friendly terms with her, had been enticed to this

concert too, and produced his overture to Ruy Blas, then quite new. It

was during the two busy days spent on this occasion in Leipzig that I

first came into close contact with him, all my previous knowledge of

him having been limited to a few rare and altogether profitless visits.

At the house of my brother-in-law, Fritz Brockhaus, he and Devrient

gave us a good deal of music, he playing her accompaniment to a number

of Schubert’s songs. I here became conscious of the peculiar unrest and

excitement with which this master of music, who, though still young,

had already reached the zenith of his fame and life’s work, observed or

rather watched me. I could see clearly that he thought but little of a

success in opera, and that merely in Dresden. Doubtless I seemed in his

eyes one of a class of musicians to whom he attached no value, and with

whom he proposed to have no intercourse. Nevertheless my success had

certain characteristic features, which gave it a more or less alarming

aspect. Mendelssohn’s most ardent desire for a long time past had been

to write a successful opera, and it was possible he now felt annoyed

that, before he had succeeded in doing so, a triumph of this nature

should suddenly be thrust into his face with blunt brutality, and based

upon a style of music which he might feel justified in regarding as

poor. He probably found it no less exasperating that Devrient, whose

gifts he acknowledged, and who was his own devoted admirer, should now

so openly and loudly sound my praises. These thoughts were dimly

shaping themselves in my mind, when Mendelssohn, by a very remarkable

statement, drove me, almost with violence, to adopt this

interpretation. On our way home together, after the joint concert

rehearsal, I was talking very warmly on the subject of music. Although

by no means a talkative man, he suddenly interrupted me with curiously

hasty excitement by the assertion that music had but one great fault,

namely, that more than any other art it stimulated not only our good,

but also our evil qualities, such, for instance, as jealousy. I blushed

with shame to have to apply this speech to his own feelings towards me;

for I was profoundly conscious of my innocence of ever having dreamed,

even in the remotest degree, of placing my own talents or performances

as a musician in comparison with his. Yet, strange to say, at this very

concert he showed himself in a light by no means calculated to place

him beyond all possibility of comparison with myself. A rendering of

his Hebrides Overture would have placed him so immeasurably above my

two operatic airs, that all shyness at having to stand beside him would

have been spared me, as the gulf between our two productions was

impassable. But in his choice of the Ruy Blas Overture he appears to

have been prompted by a desire to place himself on this occasion so

close to the operatic style that its effectiveness might be reflected

upon his own work. The overture was evidently calculated for a Parisian

audience, and the astonishment Mendelssohn caused by appearing in such

a connection was shown by Robert Schumann in his own ungainly fashion

at its close. Approaching the musician in the orchestra, he blandly,

and with a genial smile, expressed his admiration of the ‘brilliant

orchestral piece’ just played..

But in the interests of veracity let me not forget that neither he nor

I scored the real success of that evening. We were both wholly eclipsed

by the tremendous effect produced by the grey-haired Sophie Schroder in

a recitation of Burger’s Lenore. While the daughter had been taunted in

the newspapers with unfairly employing all sorts of musical attractions

to cozen a benefit concert out of the music lovers of Leipzig for a

mother who never had anything to do with that art, we, who were there

as her musical aiders and abettors, had to stand like so many idle

conjurers, while this aged and almost toothless dame declaimed Burger’s

poem with truly terrifying beauty and grandeur. This episode, like so

much else that I saw during these few days, gave me abundant food for

thought and meditation.

A second excursion, also undertaken with Devrient, took me in the

December of that year to Berlin, where the singer had been invited to

appear at a grand state concert. I for my part wanted an interview with

Director Küstner about the Fliegender Holländer. Although I arrived at

no definite result regarding my own personal business, this short visit

to Berlin was memorable for my meeting with Franz Liszt, which

afterwards proved of great importance. It took place under singular

circumstances, which placed both him and me in a situation of peculiar

embarrassment, brought about in the most wanton fashion by Devrient’s

exasperating caprice.

I had already told my patroness the story of my earlier meeting with

Liszt. During that fateful second winter of my stay in Paris, when I

had at last been driven to be grateful for Schlesinger’s hack-work, I

one day received word from Laube, who always bore me in mind, that F.

Liszt was coming to Paris. He had mentioned and recommended me to him

when he was in Germany, and advised me to lose no time in looking him

up, as he was ‘generous,’ and would certainly find means of helping me.

As soon as I heard that he had really arrived, I presented myself at

the hotel to see him. It was early in the morning. On my entrance I

found several strange gentlemen waiting in the drawing-room, where,

after some time, we were joined by Liszt himself, pleasant and affable,

and wearing his indoor coat. The conversation was carried on in French,

and turned upon his experiences during his last professional journey in

Hungary. As I was unable to take part, on account of the language, I

listened for some time, feeling heartily bored, until at last he asked

me pleasantly what he could do for me. He seemed unable to recall

Laube’s recommendation, and all the answer I could give was that I

desired to make his acquaintance. To this he had evidently no

objection, and informed me he would take care to have a ticket sent me

for his great matinee, which was to take place shortly. My sole attempt

to introduce an artistic theme of conversation was a question as to

whether he knew Lowe’s Erlkonig as well as Schubert’s. His reply in the

negative frustrated this somewhat awkward attempt, and I ended my visit

by giving him my address. Thither his secretary, Belloni, presently

sent me, with a few polite words, a card of admission to a concert to

be given entirely by the master himself in the Salle Erard. I duly

wended my way to the overcrowded hall, and beheld the platform on which

the grand piano stood, closely beleaguered by the cream of Parisian

female society, and witnessed their enthusiastic ovations of this

virtuoso, who was at that time the wonder of the world. Moreover, I

heard several of his most brilliant pieces, such as ‘Variations on

Robert le Diable,’ but carried away with me no real impression beyond

that of being stunned. This took place just at the time when I

abandoned a path which had been contrary to my truer nature, and had

led me astray, and on which I now emphatically turned my back in silent

bitterness. I was therefore in no fitting mood for a just appreciation

of this prodigy, who at that time was shining in the blazing light of

day, but from whom I had turned my face to the night. I went to see

Liszt no more.

As already mentioned, I had given Devrient a bare outline of this

story, but she had noted it with particular attention, for I happened

to have touched her weak point of professional jealousy. As Liszt had

also been commanded by the King of Prussia to appear at the grand state

concert at Berlin, it so happened that the first time they met Liszt

questioned her with great interest about the success of Rienzi. She

thereupon observed that the composer of that opera was an altogether

unknown man, and proceeded with curious malice to taunt him with his

apparent lack of penetration, as proved by the fact that the said

composer, who now so keenly excited his interest, was the very same

poor musician whom he had lately ‘turned away so contemptuously’ in

Paris. All this she told me with an air of triumph, which distressed me

very much, and I at once set to work to correct the false impression

conveyed by my former account. As we were still debating this point in

her room, we were startled by hearing from the next the famous bass

part in the ‘Revenge’ air from Donna Anna, rapidly executed in octaves

on the piano. ‘That’s Liszt himself,’ she cried. Liszt then entered the

room to fetch her for the rehearsal. To my great embarrassment she

introduced me to him with malicious delight as the composer of Rienzi,

the man whose acquaintance he now wished to make after having

previously shown him the door in his glorious Paris. My solemn

asseverations that my patroness—no doubt only in fun—was deliberately

distorting my account of my former visit to him, apparently pacified

him so far as I was concerned, and, on the other hand, he had no doubt

already formed his own opinion of the impulsive singer. He certainly

regretted that he could not remember my visit in Paris, but it

nevertheless shocked and alarmed him to learn that any one should have

had reason to complain of such treatment at his hands. The hearty

sincerity of Listz’s simple words to me about this misunderstanding, as

contrasted with the strangely passionate raillery of the incorrigible

lady, made a most pleasing and captivating impression upon me. The

whole bearing of the man, and the way in which he tried to ward off the

pitiless scorn of her attacks, was something new to me, and gave me a

deep insight into his character, so firm in its amiability and

boundless good-nature. Finally, she teased him about the Doctor’s

degree which had just been conferred on him by the University of

Königsberg, and pretended to mistake him for a chemist. At last he

stretched himself out flat on the floor, and implored her mercy,

declaring himself quite defenceless against the storm of her invective.

Then turning to me with a hearty assurance that he would make it his

business to hear Rienzi, and would in any case endeavour to give me a

better opinion of himself than his evil star had hitherto permitted, we

parted for that occasion.

The almost naive simplicity and naturalness of his every phrase and

word, and particularly his emphatic manner, left a most profound

impression upon me. No one could fail to be equally affected by these

qualities, and I now realised for the first time the almost magic power

exerted by Liszt over all who came in close contact with him, and saw

how erroneous had been my former opinion as to its cause.

These two excursions to Leipzig and Berlin found but brief

interruptions of the period devoted at home to our study of the

Fliegender Holländer. It was therefore, of paramount importance to me

to maintain Schroder-Devrient’s keen interest in her part, since, in

view of the weakness of the rest of the cast, I was convinced that it

was from her alone I could expect any adequate interpretation of the

spirit of my work.

The part of Senta was essentially suited to her, and there were just at

that moment peculiar circumstances in her life which brought her

naturally emotional temperament to a high pitch of tension. I was

amazed when she confided to me that she was on the point of breaking

off a regular liaison of many years’ standing, to form, in passionate

haste, another much less desirable one. The forsaken lover, who was

tenderly devoted to her, was a young lieutenant in the Royal Guards,

and the son of Muller, the ex-Minister of Education; her new choice,

whose acquaintance she had formed on a recent visit to Berlin, was Herr

von Munchhausen. He was a tall, slim young man, and her predilection

for him was easily explained when I became more closely acquainted with

her love affairs. It seemed to me that the bestowal of her confidence

on me in this matter arose from her guilty conscience; she was aware

that Muller, whom I liked on account of his excellent disposition, had

loved her with the earnestness of a first love, and also that she was

now betraying him in the most faithless way on a trivial pretext. She

must have known that her new lover was entirely unworthy of her, and

that his intentions were frivolous and selfish. She knew, too, that no

one, and certainly none of her older friends who knew her best, would

approve of her behaviour. She told me candidly that she had felt

impelled to confide in me because I was a genius, and would understand

the demands of her temperament. I hardly knew what to think. I was

repelled alike by her passion and the circumstances attending it; but

to my astonishment I had to confess that the infatuation, so repulsive

to me, held this strange woman in so powerful a grasp that I could not

refuse her a certain amount of pity, nay, even real sympathy.

She was pale and distraught, ate hardly anything, and her faculties

were subjected to a strain so extraordinary that I thought she would

not escape a serious, perhaps a fatal illness. Sleep had long since

deserted her, and whenever I brought her my unlucky Fliegender

Holländer, her looks so alarmed me that the proposed rehearsal was the

last thing I thought of. But in this matter she insisted; she made me

sit down at the piano, and then plunged into the study of her role as

if it were a matter of life and death. She found the actual learning of

the part very difficult, and it was only by repeated and persevering

rehearsal that she mastered her task. She would sing for hours at a

time with such passion that I often sprang up in terror and begged her

to spare herself; then she would point smiling to her chest, and expand

the muscles of her still magnificent person, to assure me that she was

doing herself no harm. Her voice really acquired at that time a

youthful freshness and power of endurance. I had to confess that which

often astonished me: this infatuation for an insipid nobody was very

much to the advantage of my Senta. Her courage under this intense

strain was so great that, as time pressed, she consented to have the

general rehearsal on the very day of the first performance, and a delay

which would have been greatly to my disadvantage was thus avoided.

The performance took place on 2nd January, in the year 1843. Its result

was extremely instructive to me, and led to the turning-point of my

career. The ill-success of the performance taught me how much care and

forethought were essential to secure the adequate dramatic

interpretation of my latest works. I realised that I had more or less

believed that my score would explain itself, and that my singers would

arrive at the right interpretation of their own accord. My good old

friend Wachter, who at the time of Henriette Sontag’s first success was

a favourite ‘Barber of Seville,’ had from the first discreetly thought

otherwise. Unfortunately, even Schroder-Devrient only saw when the

rehearsals were too far advanced how utterly incapable Wachter was of

realising the horror and supreme suffering of my Mariner. His

distressing corpulence, his broad fat face, the extraordinary movements

of his arms and legs, which he managed to make look like mere stumps,

drove my passionate Senta to despair. At one rehearsal, when in the

great scene in Act ii. she comes to him in the guise of a guardian

angel to bring the message of salvation, she broke off to whisper

despairingly in my ear, ‘How can I say it when I look into those beady

eyes? Good God, Wagner, what a muddle you have made!’ I consoled her as

well as I could, and secretly placed my dependence on Herr von

Munchhausen, who promised faithfully to sit that evening in the front

row of the stalls, so that Devrient’s eyes must fall on him. And the

magnificent performance of my great artiste, although she stood

horribly alone on the stage, did succeed in rousing enthusiasm in the

second act. The first act offered the audience nothing but a dull

conversation between Herr Wachter and that Herr Risse who had invited

me to an excellent glass of wine on the first night of Rienzi, and in

the third the loudest raging of the orchestra did not rouse the sea

from its dead calm nor the phantom ship in its cautious rocking. The

audience fell to wondering how I could have produced this crude,

meagre, and gloomy work after Rienzi, in every act of which incident

abounded, and Tichatschek shone in an endless variety of costumes.

As Schroder-Devrient soon left Dresden for a considerable time, the

Fliegender Holländer saw only four performances, at which the

diminishing audiences made it plain that I had not pleased Dresden

taste with it. The management was compelled to revive Rienzi in order

to maintain my prestige; and the triumph of this opera compared with

the failure of the Dutchman gave me food for reflection. I had to

admit, with some misgivings, that the success of my Rienzi was not

entirely due to the cast and staging, although I was fully alive to the

defects from which the Fliegender Holländer suffered in this respect.

Although Wachter was far from realising my conception of the Fliegender

Holländer I could not conceal from myself the fact that Tichatschek was

quite as far removed from the ideal Rienzi. His abominable errors and

deficiencies in his presentation of the part had never escaped me; he

had never been able to lay aside his brilliant and heroic leading-tenor

manners in order to render that gloomy demonic strain in Rienzi’s

temperament on which I had laid unmistakable stress at the critical

points of the drama. In the fourth act, after the pronouncement of the

curse, he fell on his knees in the most melancholy fashion and

abandoned himself to bewailing his fate in piteous tones. When I

suggested to him that Rienzi, though inwardly despairing, must take up

an attitude of statuesque firmness before the world, he pointed out to

me the great popularity which the end of this very act had won as

interpreted by himself, with an intimation that he intended making no

change in it.

And when I considered the real causes of the success of Rienzi, I found

that it rested on the brilliant and extraordinarily fresh voice of the

soaring, happy singer, in the refreshing effect of the chorus and the

gay movement and colouring on the stage. I received a still more

convincing proof of this when we divided the opera into two, and found

that the second part, which was the more important from both the

dramatic and the musical point of view, was noticeably less well

attended than the first, for the very obvious reason, as I thought,

that the ballet occurred in the first part. My brother Julius, who had

come over from Leipzig for one of the performances of Rienzi, gave me a

still more naive testimony as to the real point of interest in the

opera. I was sitting with him in an open box, in full sight of the

audience, and had therefore begged him to desist from giving any

applause, even if directed only to the efforts of the singers; he

restrained himself all through the evening, but his enthusiasm at a

certain figure of the ballet was too much for him, and he clapped

loudly, to the great amusement of the audience, telling me that he

could not hold himself in any longer. Curiously enough, this same

ballet secured for Rienzi, which was otherwise received with

indifference, the enduring preference of the present King of

Prussia,[11] who many years afterwards ordered the revival of this

opera, although it had utterly failed in arousing public interest by

its merits as a drama.

[11] William the First.

I found, when I had to be present later on at a representation of the

same opera at Darmstadt, that while wholesale cuts had to be made in

its best parts, it had been found necessary to expand the ballets by

additions and repetitions. This ballet music, which I had put together

with contemptuous haste at Riga in a few days without any inspiration,

seemed to me, moreover, so strikingly weak that I was thoroughly

ashamed of it even in those days at Dresden, when I had found myself

compelled to suppress its best feature, the tragic pantomime. Further,

the resources of the ballet in Dresden did not even admit of the

execution of my stage directions for the combat in the arena, nor for

the very significant round dances, both admirably carried out at a

later date in Berlin. I had to be content with the humiliating

substitution of a long, foolish step-dance by two insignificant

dancers, which was ended by a company of soldiers marching on, bearing

their shields on high so as to form a roof and remind the audience of

the Roman testudo; then the ballet-master with his assistant, in

flesh-coloured tights, leaped on to the shields and turned somersaults,

a proceeding which they thought was reminiscent of the gladiatorial

games. It was at this point that the house was always moved to

resounding applause, and I had to own that this moment marked the

climax of my success.

I thus had my doubts as to the intrinsic divergence between my inner

aims and my outward success; at the same time a decisive and fatal

change in my fortunes was brought about by my acceptance of the

conductorship at Dresden, under circumstances as perplexing in their

way as those preceding my marriage. I had met the negotiations which

led up to this appointment with a hesitation and a coolness by no means

affected. I felt nothing but scorn for theatrical life; a scorn that

was by no means lessened by a closer acquaintance with the apparently

distinguished ruling body of a court theatre, the splendours of which

only conceal, with arrogant ignorance, the humiliating conditions

appertaining to it and to the modern theatre in general. I saw every

noble impulse stifled in those occupied with theatrical matters, and a

combination of the vainest and most frivolous interests maintained by a

ridiculously rigid and bureaucratic system; I was now fully convinced

that the necessity of handling the business of the theatre would be the

most distasteful thing I could imagine. Now that, through Rastrelli’s

death, the temptation to be false to my inner conviction came to me in

Dresden, I explained to my old and trusted friends that I did not think

I should accept the vacant post.

But everything calculated to shake human resolution combined against

this decision. The prospect of securing the means of livelihood through

a permanent position with a fixed salary was an irresistible

attraction. I combated the temptation by reminding myself of my success

as an operatic composer, which might reasonably be expected to bring in

enough to supply my moderate requirements in a lodging of two rooms,

where I could proceed undisturbed with fresh compositions. I was told

in answer to this that my work itself would be better served by a fixed

position without arduous duties, as for a whole year since the

completion of the Fliegender Holländer I had not, under existing

circumstances, found any leisure at all for composition. I still

remained convinced that Rastrelli’s post of musical director, in

subordination to the conductor, was unworthy of me, and I declined to

entertain the proposal, thus leaving the management to look elsewhere

for some one to fill the vacancy.

There was therefore no further question of this particular post, but I

was then informed that the death of Morlacchi had left vacant a court

conductorship, and it was thought that the King would be willing to

offer me the post. My wife was very much excited at this prospect, for

in Germany the greatest value is laid on these court appointments,

which are tenable for life, and the dazzling respectability pertaining

to them is held out to German musicians as the acme of earthly

happiness. The offer opened up for us in many directions the prospect

of friendly relations in a society which had hitherto been outside our

experience. Domestic comfort and social prestige were very alluring to

the homeless wanderers who, in bygone days of misery, had often longed

for the comfort and security of an assured and permanent position such

as was now open to them under the august protection of the court. The

influence of Caroline von Weber did much in the long-run to weaken my

opposition. I was often at her house, and took great pleasure in her

society, which brought back to my mind very vividly the personality of

my still dearly beloved master. She begged me with really touching

tenderness not to withstand this obvious command of fate, and asserted

her right to ask me to settle in Dresden, to fill the place left sadly

empty by her husband’s death. ‘Just think,’ she said, ‘how can I look

Weber in the face again when I join him if I have to tell him that the

work for which he made such devoted sacrifices in Dresden is neglected;

just imagine my feelings when I see that indolent Reissiger stand in my

noble Weber’s place, and when I hear his operas produced more

mechanically every year. If you loved Weber, you owe it to his memory

to step into his place and to continue his work.’ As an experienced

woman of the world she also pointed out energetically and prudently the

practical side of the matter, impressing on me the duty of thinking of

my wife, who would, in case of my death, be sufficiently provided for

if I accepted the post.

The promptings of affection, prudence and good sense, however, had less

weight with me than the enthusiastic conviction, never at any period of

my life entirely destroyed, that wherever fate led me, whether to

Dresden or elsewhere, I should find the opportunity which would convert

my dreams into reality through currents set in motion by some change in

the everyday order of events. All that was needed for this was the

advent of an ardent and aspiring soul who, with good luck to back him,

might make up for lost time, and by his ennobling influence achieve the

deliverance of art from her shameful bonds. The wonderful and rapid

change which had taken place in my fortunes could not fail to encourage

such a hope, and I was seduced on perceiving the marked alteration that

had taken place in the whole attitude of Lüttichau, the general

director, towards me. This strange individual showed me a kindliness of

which no one would hitherto have thought him capable, and that he was

prompted by a genuine feeling of personal benevolence towards me I

could not help being absolutely convinced, even at the time of my

subsequent ceaseless differences with him.

Nevertheless, the decision came as a kind of surprise. On 2nd February

1843 I was very politely invited to the director’s office, and there

met the general staff of the royal orchestra, in whose presence

Lüttichau, through the medium of my never-to-be-forgotten friend

Winkler, solemnly read out to me a royal rescript appointing me

forthwith conductor to his Majesty, with a life salary of four thousand

five hundred marks a year. Lüttichau followed the reading of this

document by a more or less ceremonious speech, in which he assumed that

I should gratefully accept the King’s favour. At this polite ceremony

it did not escape my notice that all possibility of future negotiations

over the figure of the salary was cut off; on the other hand, a

substantial exemption in my favour, the omission of the condition,

enforced even on Weber in his time, of serving a year’s probation under

the title of mere musical director, was calculated to secure my

unconditional acceptance. My new colleagues congratulated me, and

Lüttichau accompanied me with the politest phrases to my own door,

where I fell into the arms of my poor wife, who was giddy with delight.

Therefore I fully realised that I must put the best face I could on the

matter, and unless I wished to give unheard-of offence, I must even

congratulate myself on my appointment as royal conductor.

A few days after taking the oath as a servant of the King in solemn

session, and undergoing the ceremony of presentation to the assembled

orchestra by means of an enthusiastic speech from the general director,

I was summoned to an audience with his Majesty. When I saw the features

of the kind, courteous, and homely monarch, I involuntarily thought of

my youthful attempt at a political overture on the theme of Friedrich

und Freiheit. Our somewhat embarrassed conversation brightened with the

King’s expression of his satisfaction with those two of my operas which

had been performed in Dresden. He expressed with polite hesitation his

feeling that if my operas left anything to be desired, it was a clearer

definition of the various characters in my musical dramas. He thought

the interest in the persons was overpowered by the elemental forces

figuring beside them—in Hienzi the mob, in the Fliegender Holländer the

sea. I thought I understood his meaning perfectly, and this proof of

his sincere sympathy and original judgment pleased me very much. He

also made his excuses in advance for a possible rare attendance at my

operas on his part, his sole reason for this being that he had a

peculiar aversion from theatre-going, as the result of one of the rules

of his early training, under which he and his brother John, who had

acquired a similar aversion, were for a long time compelled regularly

to attend the theatre, when he, to tell the truth, would often have

preferred to be left alone to follow his own pursuits independent of

etiquette.

As a characteristic instance of the courtier spirit, I afterwards

learned that Lüttichau, who had had to wait for me in the anteroom

during this audience, had been very much put out by its long duration.

In the whole course of my life I was only admitted twice more to

personal intercourse and speech with the good King. The first occasion

was when I presented him with the dedication copy of the pianoforte

score of my Rienzi; and the second was after my very successful

arrangement and performance of the Iphigenia in Aulis, by Gluck, of

whose operas he was particularly fond, when he stopped me in the public

promenade and congratulated me on my work.

That first audience with the King marked the zenith of my hastily

adopted career at Dresden; thenceforward anxiety reasserted itself in

manifold ways. I very quickly realised the difficulties of my material

situation, since it soon became evident that the advantage won by new

exertions and my present appointment bore no proportion to the heavy

sacrifices and obligations which I incurred as soon as I entered on an

independent career. The young musical director of Riga, long since

forgotten, suddenly reappeared in an astonishing reincarnation as royal

conductor to the King of Saxony. The first-fruits of the universal

estimate of my good fortune took the shape of pressing creditors and

threats of prosecution; next followed demands from the Königsberg

tradesmen, from whom I had escaped from Riga by means of that horribly

wretched and miserable flight. I also heard from people in the most

distant parts, who thought they had some claim on me, dating even from

my student, nay, my school days, until at last I cried out in my

astonishment that I expected to receive a bill next from the nurse who

had suckled me. All this did not amount to any very large sum, and I

merely mention it because of the ill-natured rumours which, I learned

years later, had been spread abroad about the extent of my debts at

that time. Out of three thousand marks, borrowed at interest from

Schroder-Devrient, I not only paid these debts, but also fully

compensated the sacrifices which Kietz had made on my behalf, without

ever expecting any return, in the days of my poverty in Paris. I was,

moreover, able to be of practical use to him. But where was I to find

even this sum, as my distress had hitherto been so great that I was

obliged to urge Schroder-Devrient to hurry on the rehearsals of the

Fliegender Holländer by pointing out to her the enormous importance to

me of the fee for the performance? I had no allowance for the expenses

of my establishment in Dresden, though it had to be suitable for my

position as royal conductor, nor even for the purchase of a ridiculous

and expensive court uniform, so that there would have been no

possibility of my making a start at all, as I had no private means,

unless I borrowed money at interest.

But no one who knew of the extraordinary success of Rienzi at Dresden

could help believing in an immediate and remunerative rage for my

operas on the German stage. My own relatives, even the prudent Ottilie,

were so convinced of it that they thought I might safely count on at

least doubling my salary by the receipts from my operas. At the very

beginning the prospects did indeed seem bright; the score of my

Fliegender Holländer was ordered by the Royal Theatre at Cassel and by

the Riga theatre, which I had known so well in the old days, because

they were anxious to perform something of mine at an early date, and

had heard that this opera was on a smaller scale, and made smaller

demands on the stage management, than Rienzi. In May, 1843 I heard good

reports of the success of the performances from both those places. But

this was all for the time being, and a whole year went by without the

smallest inquiry for any of my scores. An attempt was made to secure me

some benefit by the publication of the pianoforte score of the

Fliegender Holländer, as I wanted to reserve Rienzi, after the

successes it had gained, as useful capital for a more favourable

opportunity; but the plan was spoilt by the opposition of Messrs.

Hartel of Leipzig, who, although ready enough to publish my opera,

would only do so on the condition that I abstained from asking any

payment for it.

So I had, for the present, to content myself with the moral

satisfaction of my successes, of which my unmistakable popularity with

the Dresden public, and the respect and attention paid to me, formed

part. But even in this respect my Utopian dreams were destined to be

disturbed. I think that my appearance at Dresden marked the beginning

of a new era in journalism and criticism, which found food for its

hitherto but slightly developed vitality in its vexation at my success.

The two gentlemen I have already mentioned, C. Bank and J. Schladebach,

had, as I now know, first taken up their regular abode in Dresden at

that time; I know that when difficulties were raised about the

permanence of Bank’s appointment, they were waived, owing to the

testimonials and recommendation of my present colleague Reissiger. The

success of my Rienzi had been the source of great annoyance to these

gentlemen, who were now established as musical critics to the Dresden

press, because I made no effort to win their favour; they were not

ill-pleased, therefore, to find an opportunity of pouring out the

vitriol of their hatred over the universally popular young musician who

had won the sympathy of the kindly public, partly on account of the

poverty and ill-luck which had hitherto been his lot. The need for any

kind of human consideration had suddenly vanished with my ‘unheard-of’

appointment to the royal conductorship. Now ‘all was well with me,’

‘too well,’ in fact; and envy found its congenial food; this provided a

perfectly clear and comprehensible point of attack; and soon there

spread through the German press, in the columns given to Dresden news,

an estimate of me which has never fundamentally changed, except in one

point, to this day. This single modification, which was purely

temporary and confined to papers of one political colour, occurred on

my first settlement as a political refugee in Switzerland, but lasted

only until, through Liszt’s exertions, my operas began to be produced

all over Germany, in spite of my exile. The orders from two theatres,

immediately after the Dresden performance, for one of my scores, were

merely due to the fact that up to that time the activity of my

journalistic critics was still limited. I put down the cessation of all

inquiries, certainly not without due justification, mainly to the

effect of the false and calumnious reports in the papers.

My old friend Laube tried, indeed, to undertake my defence in the

press. On New Year’s Day, 1843 he resumed the editorship of the Zeitung

fur die Elegante Welt, and asked me to provide him with a biographical

notice of myself for the first number. It evidently gave him great

pleasure to present me thus in triumph to the literary world, and in

order to give the subject more prominence he added a supplement to that

number in the shape of a lithograph reproduction of my portrait by

Kietz. But after a time even he became anxious and confused in his

judgment of my works, when he saw the systematic and increasingly

virulent detraction, depreciation, and scorn to which they were

subjected. He confessed to me later that he had never imagined such a

desperate position as mine against the united forces of journalism

could possibly exist, and when he heard my view of the question, he

smiled and gave me his blessing, as though I were a lost soul.

Moreover, a change was observable in the attitude of those immediately

connected with me in my work, and this provided very acceptable

material for the journalistic campaign. I had been led, though by no

ambitious impulse, to ask to be allowed to conduct the performances of

my own works. I found that at every performance of Rienzi Reissiger

became more negligent in his conducting, and that the whole production

was slipping back into the old familiar, expressionless, and humdrum

performance; and as my appointment was already mooted, I had asked

permission to conduct the sixth performance of my work in person. I

conducted without having held a single rehearsal, and without any

previous experience, at the head of the Dresden orchestra. The

performance went splendidly; singers and orchestra were inspired with

new life, and everybody was obliged to admit that this was the finest

performance of Rienzi that had yet been given. The rehearsing and

con-ducting of the Fliegender Holländer were willingly handed over to

me, because Reissiger was overwhelmed with work, in consequence of the

death of the musical director, Rastrelli. In addition to this I was

asked to conduct Weber’s Euryanthe, by way of providing a direct proof

of my capacity to interpret scores other than my own. Apparently

everybody was pleased, and it was the tone of this performance that

made Weber’s widow so anxious that I should accept the Dresden

conductorship; she declared that for the first time since her husband’s

death she had heard his work correctly interpreted, both in expression

and time.

Thereupon, Reissiger, who would have preferred to have a musical

director under him, but had received instead a colleague on an equal

footing, felt himself aggrieved by my appointment. Though his own

indolence would have inclined him to the side of peace and a good

understanding with me, his ambitious wife took care to stir up his fear

of me. This never led to an openly hostile attitude on his part, but I

noticed certain indiscretions in the press from that time onwards,

which showed me that the friendliness of my colleague, who never talked

to me without first embracing me, was not of the most honourable type.

I also received a quite unexpected proof that I had attracted the

bitter envy of another man whose sentiments I had no reason to suspect.

This was Karl Lipinsky, a celebrated violinist in his day, who had for

many years led the Dresden orchestra. He was a man of ardent

temperament and original talent, but of incredible vanity, which his

emotional, suspicious Polish temperament rendered dangerous. I always

found him annoying, because however inspiring and instructive his

playing was as to the technical execution of the violinists, he was

certainly ill-fitted to be the leader of a first-class orchestra. This

extraordinary person tried to justify Director Lüttichau’s praise of

his playing, which could always be heard above the rest of the

orchestra; he came in a little before the other violins; he was a

leader in a double sense, as he was always a little ahead. He acted in

much the same way with regard to expression, marking his slight

variations in the piano passages with fanatical precision. It was

useless to talk to him about it, as nothing but the most skilful

flattery had any effect on him. So I had to endure it as best I could,

and to think out ways and means of diminishing its ill effects on the

orchestral performances as a whole by having recourse to the most

polite circumlocutions. Even so he could not endure the higher

estimation in which the performances of the orchestra under my

conductorship were held, because he thought that the playing of an

orchestra in which he was the leader must invariably be excellent,

whoever stood at the conductor’s desk. Now it happened, as is always

the case when a new man with fresh ideas is installed in office, that

the members of the orchestra came to me with the most varied

suggestions for improvements which had hitherto been neglected; and

Lipinsky, who was already annoyed about this, turned a certain case of

this kind to a peculiarly treacherous use. One of the oldest

contrabassists had died. Lipinsky urged me to arrange that the post

should not be filled in the usual way by promotion from the ranks of

our own orchestra, but should be given, on his recommendation, to a

distinguished and skilful contrabassist from Darmstadt named Muller.

When the musician whose rights of seniority were thus threatened,

appealed to me, I kept my promise to Lipinsky, explained my views about

the abuses of promotion by seniority, and declared that, in accordance

with my sworn oath to the King, I held it my paramount duty to consider

the maintenance of the artistic interests of the institution before

everything else. I then found to my great astonishment, though it was

foolish of me to be surprised, that the whole of the orchestra turned

upon me as one man, and when the occasion arose for a discussion

between Lipinsky and myself as to his own numerous grievances, he

actually accused me of having threatened, by my remarks in the

contrabassist case, to undermine the well-established rights of the

members of the orchestra, whose welfare it was my duty to protect.

Lüttichau, who was on the point of absenting himself from Dresden for

some time, was extremely uneasy, as Reissiger was away on his holiday,

at leaving musical affairs in such a dangerous state of unrest. The

deceit and impudence of which I had been the victim was a revelation to

me, and I gathered from this experience the calm sense necessary to set

the harassed director at ease by the most conclusive assurances that I

understood the people with whom I had to deal, and would act

accordingly. I faithfully kept my word, and never again came into

collision either with Lipinsky or any other member of the orchestra. On

the contrary, all the musicians were soon so firmly attached to me that

I could always pride myself on their devotion.

From that day forward, however, one thing at least was certain, namely,

that I should not die as conductor at Dresden. My post and my work at

Dresden thenceforward became a burden, of which the occasionally

excellent results of my efforts made me all the more sensible.

My position at Dresden, however, brought me one friend whose intimate

relations with me long survived our artistic collaboration in Dresden.

A musical director was assigned to each conductor; he had to be a

musician of repute, a hard worker, adaptable, and, above all, a

Catholic, for the two conductors were Protestants, a cause of much

annoyance to the clergy of the Catholic cathedral, numerous positions

in which had to be filled from the orchestra. August Röckel, a nephew

of Hummel, who sent in his application for this position from Weimar,

furnished evidence of his suitability under all these heads. He

belonged to an old Bavarian family; his father was a singer, and had

sung the part of Florestan at the time of the first production of

Beethoven’s Fidelio, and had himself remained on terms on close

intimacy with the Master, many details about whose life have been

preserved through his care. His subsequent position as a teacher of

singing led him to take up theatrical management, and he introduced

German opera to the Parisians with so much success, that the credit for

the popularity of Fidelio and Der Freischutz with French audiences, to

whom these works were quite unknown, must be awarded to his admirable

enterprise, which was also responsible for Schroder-Devrient’s debut in

Paris. August Röckel, his son, who was still a young man, by helping

his father in these and similar undertakings, had gained practical

experience as a musician. As his father’s business had for some time

even extended to England, August had won practical knowledge of all

sorts by contact with many men and things, and in addition had learned

French and English. But music had remained his chosen vocation, and his

great natural talent justified the highest hopes of success. He was an

excellent pianist, read scores with the utmost ease, possessed an

exceptionally fine ear, and had indeed every qualification for a

practical musician. As a composer he was actuated, not so much by a

strong impulse to create, as the desire to show what he was capable of;

the success at which he aimed was to gain the reputation of a clever

operatic composer rather than recognition as a distinguished musician,

and he hoped to obtain his end by the production of popular works.

Actuated by this modest ambition he had completed an opera, Farinelli,

for which he had also written the libretto, with no other aspiration

than that of attaining the same reputation as his brother-in-law

Lortzing.

He brought this score to me, and begged me—it was his first visit

before he had heard one of my operas in Dresden—to play him something

from Rienzi and the Fliegender Holländer. His frank, agreeable

personality induced me to try and meet his wishes as far as I could;

and I am convinced that I soon made such a great and unexpectedly

powerful impression on him that from that moment he determined not to

bother me further with the score of his opera. It was not until we had

become more intimate and had discovered mutual personal interests, that

the desire of turning his work to account induced him to ask me to show

my practical friendship by turning my attention to his score. I made

various suggestions as to how it might be improved, but he was soon so

hopelessly disgusted with his own work that he put it absolutely aside,

and never again felt seriously moved to undertake a similar task. On

making a closer acquaintance with my completed operas and plans for new

works, he declared to me that he felt it his vocation to play the part

of spectator, to be my faithful helper and the interpreter of my new

ideas, and, as far as in him lay, to remove entirely, and at all events

to relieve me as far as possible from, all the unpleasantnesses of my

official position and of my dealings with the outside world. He wished,

he said, to avoid placing himself in the ridiculous position of

composing operas of his own while living on terms of close friendship

with me.

Nevertheless, I tried to urge him to turn his own talent to account,

and to this end called his attention to several plots which I wished

him to work out. Among these was the idea contained in a small French

drama entitled Cromwell’s Daughter, which was subsequently used as the

subject for a sentimental pastoral romance, and for the elaboration of

which I presented him with an exhaustive plan.

But in the end all my efforts remained fruitless, and it became evident

that his productive talent was feeble. This perhaps arose partly from

his extremely needy and trying domestic circumstances, which were such

that the poor fellow wore himself out to support his wife and numerous

growing children. Indeed, he claimed my help and sympathy in quite

another fashion than by arousing my interest in his artistic

development. He was unusually clear-headed, and possessed a rare

capacity for teaching and educating himself in every branch of

knowledge and experience; he was, moreover, so genuinely true and

good-hearted that he soon became my intimate friend and comrade. He

was, and continued to be, the only person who really appreciated the

singular nature of my position towards the surrounding world, and with

whom I could fully and sincerely discuss the cares and sorrows arising

therefrom. What dreadful trials and experiences, what painful anxieties

our common fate was to bring upon us, will soon be seen.

The earlier period of my establishment in Dresden brought me also

another devoted and lifelong friend, though his qualities were such

that he exerted a less decisive influence upon my career. This was a

young physician, named Anton Pusinelli, who lived near me. He seized

the occasion of a serenade sung in honour of my thirtieth birthday by

the Dresden Glee Club to express to me personally his hearty and

sincere attachment. We soon entered upon a quiet friendship from which

we derived a mutual benefit. He became my attentive family doctor, and

during my residence in Dresden, marked as it was by accumulating

difficulties, he had abundant opportunities of helping me. His

financial position was very good, and his ready self-sacrifice enabled

him to give me substantial succour and bound me to him by many

heartfelt obligations.

A further development of my association with Dresden buddy was provided

by the kindly advances of Chamberlain von Konneritz’s family. His wife,

Marie von Konneritz (nee Fink), was a friend of Countess Ida Hahn-Hahn,

and expressed her appreciation of my success as a composer with great

warmth, I might almost say, with enthusiasm. I was often invited to

their house, and seemed likely, through this family, to be brought into

touch with the higher aristocracy of Dresden. I merely succeeded in

touching the fringe, however, as we really had nothing in common. True,

I here made the acquaintance of Countess Rossi, the famous Sontag, by

whom, to my genuine astonishment, I was most heartily greeted, and I

thereby obtained the right of afterwards approaching her in Berlin with

a certain degree of familiarity. The curious way in which I was

disillusioned about this lady on that occasion will be related in due

course. I would only mention here that, through my earlier experiences

of the world, I had become fairly impervious to deception, and my

desire for closer acquaintance with these circles speedily gave way to

a complete hopelessness and an entire lack of ease in their sphere of

life.

Although the Konneritz couple remained friendly during the whole of my

prolonged sojourn in Dresden, yet the connection had not the least

influence either upon my development or my position. Only once, on the

occasion of a quarrel between Lüttichau and myself, the former observed

that Frau von Konneritz, by her unmeasured praises, had turned my head

and made me forget my position towards him. But in making this taunt he

forgot that, if any woman in the higher ranks of Dresden society had

exerted a real and invigorating influence upon my inward pride, that

woman was his own wife, Ida von Lüttichau (nee von Knobelsdorf).

The power which this cultured, gentle, and distinguished lady exercised

over my life was of a kind I now experienced for the first time, and

might have become of great importance had I been favoured with more

frequent and intimate intercourse. But it was less her position as wife

of the general director than her constant ill-health and my own

peculiar unwillingness to appear obtrusive, that hindered our meeting,

except at rare intervals. My recollections of her merge somewhat, in my

memory, with those of my own sister Rosalie. I remember the tender

ambition which inspired me to win the encouraging sympathy of this

sensitive woman, who was painfully wasting away amid the coarsest

surroundings. My earliest hope for the fulfilment of this ambition

arose from her appreciation of my Fliegender Holländer, in spite of the

fact that, following close upon Rienzi, it had so puzzled the Dresden

public. In this way she was the first, so to speak, who swam against

the tide and met me upon my new path. So deeply was I touched by this

conquest that, when I afterwards published the opera, I dedicated it to

her. In the account of my later years in Dresden I shall have more to

record of the warm sympathy for my new development and dearest artistic

aims for which I was indebted to her. But of real intercourse we had

none, and the character of my Dresden life was not affected by this

acquaintance, otherwise so important in itself.

On the other hand, my theatrical acquaintances thrust themselves with

irresistible importunancy into the wide foreground of my life, and in

fact, after my brilliant successes, I was still restricted to the same

limited and familiar sphere in which I had prepared myself for these

triumphs. Indeed, the only one who joined my old friends Heine and

Gaffer Fischer was Tichatschek, with his strange domestic circle. Any

one who lived in Dresden at that time and chanced to know the court

lithographer, Furstenau, will be astonished to hear that, without

really being aware of it myself, I entered into a familiarity that was

to prove a lasting one with this man who was an intimate friend of

Tichatschek’s. The importance of this singular connection may be judged

from the fact that my complete withdrawal from him coincided exactly

with the collapse of my civic position in Dresden.

My good-humoured acceptance of election to the musical committee of the

Dresden Glee Club also brought me further chance acquaintances. This

club consisted of a limited number of young merchants and officials,

who had more taste for any kind of convivial entertainment than for

music. But it was seduously kept together by a remarkable and ambitious

man, Professor Lowe, who nursed it with special objects in view, for

the attainment of which he felt the need of an authority such as I

possessed at that time in Dresden.

Among other aims he was particularly and chiefly concerned in arranging

for the transfer of Weber’s remains from London to Dresden. As this

project was one which interested me also, I lent him my support, though

he was in reality merely following the voice of personal ambition. He

furthermore desired, as head of the Glee Club—which, by the way, from

the point of view of music was quite worthless—to invite all the male

choral unions of Saxony to a great gala performance in Dresden. A

committee was appointed for the execution of this plan, and as things

soon became pretty warm, Lowe turned it into a regular revolutionary

tribunal, over which, as the great day of triumph approached, he

presided day and night without resting, and by his furious zeal earned

from me the nickname of ‘Robespierre.’

In spite of the fact that I had been placed at the head of this

enterprise, I luckily managed to evade his terrorism, as I was fully

occupied with a great composition promised for the festival. The task

had been assigned to me of writing an important piece for male voices

only, which, if possible, should occupy half an hour. I reflected that

the tiresome monotony of male singing, which even the orchestra could

only enliven to a slight extent, can only be endured by the

introduction of dramatic themes. I therefore designed a great choral

scene, selecting the apostolic Pentecost with the outpouring of the

Holy Ghost as its subject. I completely avoided any real solos, but

worked out the whole in such a way that it should be executed by

detached choral masses according to requirement. Out of this

composition arose my Liebesmahl der Apostel (‘Lovefeast of the

Apostles’), which has recently been performed in various places.

As I was obliged at all costs to finish it within a limited time, I do

not mind including this in the list of my uninspired compositions. But

I was not displeased with it when it was done, more especially when it

was played at the rehearsals given by the Dresden choral societies

under my personal supervision. When, therefore, twelve hundred singers

from all parts of Saxony gathered around me in the Frauenkirche, where

the performance took place, I was astonished at the comparatively

feeble effect produced upon my ear by this colossal human tangle of

sounds. The conclusion at which I arrived was, that these enormous

choral undertakings are folly, and I never again felt inclined to

repeat the experiment.

It was with much difficulty that I shook myself free of the Dresden

Glee Club, and I only succeeded in doing so by introducing to Professor

Lowe another ambitious man in the person of Herr Ferdinand Hiller. My

most glorious exploit in connection with this association was the

transfer of Weber’s ashes, of which I will speak later on, though it

occurred at an earlier date. I will only refer now to another

commissioned composition which, as royal bandmaster, I was officially

commanded to produce. On the 7th of June of this year (1843) the statue

of King Frederick Augustus by Rietschl was unveiled in the Dresden

Zwinger [12] with all due pomp and ceremony. In honour of this event I,

in collaboration with Mendelssohn, was commanded to compose a festal

song, and to conduct the gala performance. I had written a simple song

for male voices of modest design, whereas to Mendelssohn had been

assigned the more complicated task of interweaving the National Anthem

(the English ‘God Save the King,’ which in Saxony is called Heil Dir im

Rautenkranz) into the male chorus he had to compose. This he had

effected by an artistic work in counterpoint, so arranged that from the

first eight beats of his original melody the brass instruments

simultaneously played the Anglo-Saxon popular air. My simpler song

seems to have sounded very well from a distance, whereas I understood

that Mendelssohn’s daring combination quite missed its effect, because

no one could understand why the vocalists did not sing the same air as

the wind instruments were playing. Nevertheless Mendelssohn, who was

present, left me a written expression of thanks for the pains I had

taken in the production of his composition. I also received a gold

snuff-box from the grand gala committee, presumably meant as a reward

for my male chorus, but the hunting scene which was engraved on the top

was so badly done that I found, to my surprise, that in several places

the metal was cut through.

[12] This is the name by which the famous Dresden Art Galleries are

known.—Editor.

Amid all the distractions of this new and very different mode of life,

I diligently strove to concentrate and steel my soul against these

influences, bearing in mind my experiences of success in the past. By

May of my thirtieth year I had finished my poem Der Venusberg (‘The

Mount of Venus’), as I called Tannhäuser at that time. I had not yet by

any means gained any real knowledge of mediaeval poetry. The classical

side of the poetry of the Middle Ages had so far only faintly dawned

upon me, partly from my youthful recollections, and partly from the

brief acquaintance I had made with it through Lehrs’ instruction in

Paris.

Now that I was secure in the possession of a royal appointment that

would last my lifetime, the establishment of a permanent domestic

hearth began to assume great importance; for I hoped it would enable me

to take up my serious studies once more, and in such a way as to make

them productive—an aim which my theatrical life and the miseries of my

years in Paris had rendered impossible. My hope of being able to do

this was strengthened by the character of my official employment, which

was never very arduous, and in which I met with exceptional

consideration from the general management. Though I had only held my

appointment for a few months, yet I was given a holiday this first

summer, which I spent in a second visit to Toplitz, a place which I had

grown to like, and whither I had sent on my wife in advance.

Keenly indeed did I appreciate the change in my position since the

preceding year. I could now engage four spacious and well-appointed

rooms in the same house—the Eiche at Schonau—where I had before lived

in such straitened and frugal circumstances. I invited my sister Clara

to pay us a visit, and also my good mother, whose gout necessitated her

taking the Toplitz baths every year. I also seized the opportunity of

drinking the mineral waters, which I hoped might have a beneficial

effect on the gastric troubles from which I had suffered ever since my

vicissitudes in Paris. Unfortunately the attempted cure had a contrary

effect, and when I complained of the painful irritation produced, I

learned that my constitution was not adapted for water cures. In fact,

on my morning promenade, and while drinking my water, I had been

observed to race through the shady alleys of the adjacent Thurn

Gardens, and it was pointed out to me that such a cure could only be

properly wrought by leisurely calm and easy sauntering. It was also

remarked that I usually carried about a fairly stout volume, and that,

armed with this and my bottle of mineral water, I used to take rest in

lonely places.

This book was J. Grimm’s German Mythology. All who know the work can

understand how the unusual wealth of its contents, gathered from every

side, and meant almost exclusively for the student, would react upon

me, whose mind was everywhere seeking for something definite and

distinct. Formed from the scanty fragments of a perished world, of

which scarcely any monuments remained recognisable and intact, I here

found a heterogeneous building, which at first glance seemed but a

rugged rock clothed in straggling brambles. Nothing was finished, only

here and there could the slightest resemblance to an architectonic line

be traced, so that I often felt tempted to relinquish the thankless

task of trying to build from such materials. And yet I was enchained by

a wondrous magic. The baldest legend spoke to me of its ancient home,

and soon my whole imagination thrilled with images; long-lost forms for

which I had sought so eagerly shaped themselves ever more and more

clearly into realities that lived again. There rose up soon before my

mind a whole world of figures, which revealed themselves as so

strangely plastic and primitive, that, when I saw them clearly before

me and heard their voices in my heart, I could not account for the

almost tangible familiarity and assurance of their demeanour. The

effect they produced upon the inner state of my soul I can only

describe as an entire rebirth. Just as we feel a tender joy over a

child’s first bright smile of recognition, so now my own eyes flashed

with rapture as I saw a world, revealed, as it were, by miracle, in

which I had hitherto moved blindly as the babe in its mother’s womb.

But the result of this reading did not at first do much to help me in

my purpose of composing part of the Tannhäuser music. I had had a piano

put in my room at the Eiche, and though I smashed all its strings,

nothing satisfactory would emerge. With much pain and toil I sketched

the first outlines of my music for the Venusberg, as fortunately I

already had its theme in my mind. Meanwhile I was very much troubled by

excitability and rushes of blood to the brain. I imagined I was ill,

and lay for whole days in bed, where I read Grimm’s German legends, or

tried to master the disagreeable mythology. It was quite a relief when

I hit upon the happy thought of freeing myself from the torments of my

condition by an excursion to Prague. Meanwhile I had already ascended

Mount Millischau once with my wife, and in her company I now made the

journey to Prague in an open carriage. There I stayed once more at my

favourite inn, the Black Horse, met my friend Kittl, who had now grown

fat and rotund, made various excursions, revelled in the curious

antiquities of the old city, and learned to my joy that the two lovely

friends of my youth, Jenny and Auguste Pachta, had been happily married

to members of the highest aristocracy. Thereupon, having reassured

myself that everything was in the best possible order, I returned to

Dresden and resumed my functions as musical conductor to the King of

Saxony.

We now set to work on the preparations and furnishing of a roomy and

well-situated house in the Ostra Allee, with an outlook upon the

Zwinger. Everything was good and substantial, as is only right for a

man of thirty who is settling down at last for the whole of his life.

As I had not received any subsidy towards this outlay, I had naturally

to raise the money by loan. But I could look forward to a certain

harvest from my operatic successes in Dresden, and what was more

natural than for me to expect soon to earn more than enough? The three

most valued treasures which adorned my house were a concert grand piano

by Breitkopf and Hartel, which I had bought with much pride; a stately

writing-desk, now in possession of Otto Kummer, the chamber-music

artist; and the title-page by Cornelius for the Nibelungen, in a

handsome Gothic frame—the only object which has remained faithful to me

to the present day. But the thing which above all else made my house

seem homelike and attractive was the presence of a library, which I

procured in accordance with a systematic plan laid down by my proposed

line of study. On the failure of my Dresden career this library passed

in a curious way into the possession of Herr Heinrich Brockhaus, to

whom at that time I owed fifteen hundred marks, and who took it as

security for the amount. My wife knew nothing at the time of this

obligation, and I never afterwards succeeded in recovering this

characteristic collection from his hands. Upon its shelves old German

literature was especially well represented, and also the closely

related work of the German Middle Ages, including many a costly volume,

as, for instance, the rare old work, Romans des douze Paris. Beside

these stood many excellent historical works on the Middle Ages, as well

as on the German people in general. At the same time I made provision

for the poetical and classical literature of all times and languages.

Among these were the Italian poets, Shakespeare and the French writers,

of whose language I had a passable knowledge. All these I acquired in

the original, hoping some day to find time to master their neglected

tongues. As for the Greek and Roman classics, I had to content myself

with standard German translations. Indeed, on looking once more into my

Homer—whom I secured in the original Greek—I soon recognised that I

should be presuming on more leisure than my conductorship was likely to

leave me, if I hoped to find time for regaining my lost knowledge of

that language. Moreover, I provided most thoroughly for a study of

universal history, and to this end did not fail to equip myself with

the most voluminous works. Thus armed, I thought I could bid defiance

to all the trials which I clearly foresaw would inevitably accompany my

calling and position. In hopes, therefore, of long and peaceable

enjoyment of this hard-earned home, I entered into possession with the

best of spirits in October of this year (1843), and though my

conductor’s quarters were by no means magnificent, they were stately

and substantial.

The first leisure in my new home which I could snatch from the claims

of my profession and my favourite studies was devoted to the

composition of Tannhäuser, the first act of which was completed in

January of the new year, 1844. I have no recollections of any

importance regarding my activities in Dresden during this winter. The

only memorable events were two enterprises which took me away from

home, the first to Berlin early in the year, for the production of my

Fliegender Holländer, and the other in March to Hamburg for Rienzi.

Of these the former made the greater impression upon my mind. The

manager of the Berlin theatre, Küstner, quite took me by surprise when

he announced the first performance of the Fliegender Holländer for an

early date.

As the opera house had been burnt down only about a year before, and

could not possibly have been rebuilt, it had not occurred to me to

remind them about the production of my opera. It had been performed in

Dresden with very poor scenic accessories, and knowing how important a

careful and artistic execution of the difficult scenery was for my

dramatic sea-scapes, I had relied implicitly on the admirable

management and staging capacities of the Berlin opera house.

Consequently I was very much annoyed that the Berlin manager should

select my opera as a stopgap to be produced at the Comedy Theatre,

which was being used as a temporary opera house. All remonstrances

proved useless, for I learned that they were not merely thinking about

rehearsing the work, but that it was already actually being rehearsed,

and would be produced in a few days. It was obvious that this

arrangement meant that my opera was to be condemned to quite a short

run in their repertoire, as it was not to be expected that they would

remount it when the new opera house was opened. On the other hand, they

tried to appease me by saying that this first production of the

Fliegender Holländer was to be associated with a special engagement of

Schroder-Devrient, which was to begin in Berlin immediately. They

naturally thought I should be delighted to see the great actress in my

own work. But this only confirmed me in the suspicion that this opera

was simply wanted as a makeshift for the duration of

Schroder-Devrient’s visit. They were evidently in a dilemma with regard

to her repertoire, which consisted mainly of so-called grand

operas—such as Meyerbeer’s—destined exclusively for the opera house,

and which were being specially reserved for the brilliant future of the

new building. I therefore realised beforehand that my Fliegender

Holländer was to be relegated to the category of conductor’s operas,

and would meet with the usual predestined fate of such productions. The

whole treatment meted out to me and my works all pointed in the same

direction; but in consideration of the expected co-operation of

Schroder-Devrient I fought against these vexatious premonitions, and

set out for Berlin to do all I could for the success of my opera. I saw

at once that my presence was very necessary. I found the conductor’s

desk occupied by a man calling himself Conductor Henning (or Henniger),

an official who had won promotion from the ranks of ordinary musicians

by an upright observance of the laws of seniority, but who knew

precious little about conducting an orchestra at all, and about my

opera had not the faintest glimmer of an idea. I took my seat at the

desk, and conducted one full rehearsal and two performances, in neither

of which, however, did Schroder-Devrient take part. Although I found

much to complain of in the weakness of the string instruments and the

consequent mean sound of the orchestra, yet I was well satisfied with

the actors both as regards their capacity and their zeal. The careful

staging, moreover, which under the supervision of the really gifted

stage manager, Blum, and with the co-operation of his skilful and

ingenious mechanics, was truly excellent, gave me a most pleasant

surprise.

I was now very curious to learn what effect these pleasing and

encouraging preparations would have upon the Berlin public when the

full performance took place. My experiences on this point were very

curious. Apparently the only thing that interested the large audience

was to discover my weak points. During the first act the prevalent

opinion seemed to be that I belonged to the category of bores. Not a

single hand was moved, and I was afterwards informed that this was

fortunate, as the slightest attempt at applause would have been

ascribed to a paid claque, and would have been energetically opposed.

Küstner alone assured me that the composure with which, on the close of

this act, I quitted my desk and appeared before the curtain, had filled

him with wonder, considering this entire absence—lucky as it appears to

have been—of all applause. But so long as I myself felt content with

the execution, I was not disposed to let the public apathy discourage

me, knowing, as I did, that the crucial test was in the second act.

It lay, therefore, much nearer my heart to do all I could for the

success of this than to inquire into the reasons for this attitude on

the part of the Berlin public. And here the ice was really broken at

last. The audience seemed to abandon all idea of finding a proper niche

for me, and allowed itself to be carried away into giving vent to

applause, which at last grew into the most boisterous enthusiasm. At

the close of the act, amid a storm of shouts, I led forward my singers

on to the stage for the customary bows of thanks. As the third act was

too short to be tedious, and as the scenic effects were both new and

impressive, we could not help hoping that we had won a veritable

triumph, especially as renewed outbursts of applause marked the end of

the performance. Mendelssohn, who happened at that time to be in

Berlin, with Meyerbeer, on business relating to the general musical

conductorship, was present in a stage box during this performance. He

followed its progress with a pale face, and afterwards came and

murmured to me in a weary tone of voice, ‘Well, I should think you are

satisfied now!’ I met him several times during my brief stay in

Berlin., and also spent an evening with him listening to various pieces

of chamber-music. But never did another word concerning the Fliegender

Holländer pass his lips, beyond inquiries as to the second performance,

and as to whether Devrient or some one else would appear in it. I

heard, moreover, that he had responded with equal indifference to the

earnest warmth of my allusions to his own music for the Midsummer

Night’s Dream, which was being frequently played at that time, and

which I had heard for the first time. The only thing he discussed with

any detail was the actor Gern, who was playing in Zettel, and who he

considered was overacting his part.

A few days later came a second performance with the same cast. My

experiences on this evening were even more startling than on the

former. Evidently the first night had won me a few friends, who were

again present, for they began to applaud after the overture. But others

responded with hisses, and for the rest of the evening no one again

ventured to applaud. My old friend Heine had arrived in the meantime

from Dresden, sent by our own board of directors to study the scenic

arrangements of the Midsummer Night’s Dream for our theatre. He was

present at this second performance, and had persuaded me to accept the

invitation from one of his Berlin relatives to have supper after the

performance in a wine-bar unter den Linden. Very weary, I followed him

to a nasty and badly lighted house, where I gulped down the wine with

hasty ill-humour to warm myself, and listened to the embarrassed

conversation of my good-natured friend and his companion, whilst I

turned over the day’s papers. I now had ample leisure to read the

criticisms they contained on the first performance of my Fliegender

Holländer. A terrible spasm cut my heart as I realised the contemptible

tone and unparalleled shamelessness of their raging ignorance regarding

my own name and work. Our Berlin friend and host, a thorough

Philistine, said that he had known how things would go in the theatre

that night, after having read these criticisms in the morning. The

people of Berlin, he added, wait to hear what Rellstab and his mates

have to say, and then they know how to behave. The good fellow was

anxious to cheer me up, and ordered one wine after another. Heine

hunted up his reminiscences of our merry Rienzi times in Dresden, until

at last the pair conducted me, staggering along in an addled condition,

to my hotel.

It was already midnight. As I was being lighted by the waiter through

its gloomy corridors to my room, a gentleman in black, with a pale

refined face, came forward and said he would like to speak to me. He

informed me that he had waited there since the close of the play, and

as he was determined to see me, had stopped till now. I excused myself

on the ground of being quite unfit for business, and added that,

although not exactly inclined to merriment, I had, as he might

perceive, somewhat foolishly drunk a little too much wine. This I said

in a stammering voice; but my strange visitor seemed only the more

unwilling to be repulsed. He accompanied me to my room, declaring that

it was all the more imperative for him to speak with me. We seated

ourselves in the cold room, by the meagre light of a single candle, and

then he began to talk. In flowing and impressive language he related

that he had been present at the performance that night of my Fliegender

Holländer, and could well conceive the humour in which the evening’s

experiences had left me. For this very reason he felt that nothing

should hinder him from speaking to me that night, and telling me that

in the Fliegender Holländer I had produced an unrivalled masterpiece.

Moreover, the acquaintance he had made with this work had awakened in

him a new and unforeseen hope for the future of German art; and that it

would be a great pity if I yielded to any sense of discouragement as

the result of the unworthy reception accorded to it by the Berlin

public. My hair began to stand on end. One of Hoffmann’s fantastic

creations had entered bodily into my life. I could find nothing to say,

except to inquire the name of my visitor, at which he seemed surprised,

as I had talked with him the day before at Mendelssohn’s house. He said

that my conversation and manner had created such an impression upon him

there, and had filled him with such sudden regret at not having

sufficiently overcome his dislike for opera in general, to be present

at the first performance, that he had at once resolved not to miss the

second. His name, he added, was Professor Werder. That was no use to

me, I said, he must write his name down. Getting paper and ink, he did

as I desired, and we parted. I flung myself unconsciously on the bed

for a deep and invigorating sleep. Next morning I was fresh and well. I

paid a farewell call on Schroeder-Devrient, who promised me to do all

she could for the Fliegender Holländer as soon as possible, drew my fee

of a hundred ducats, and set off for home. On my way through Leipzig I

utilised my ducats for the repayment of sundry advances made me by my

relatives during the earlier and poverty-stricken period of my sojourn

in Dresden, and then continued my journey, to recuperate among my books

and meditate upon the deep impression made on me by Werder’s midnight

visit.

Before the end of this winter I received a genuine invitation to

Hamburg for the performance of Rienzi. The enterprising director, Herr

Cornet, through whom it came, confessed that he had many difficulties

to contend against in the management of his theatre, and was in need of

a great success. This, after the reception with which it had met in

Dresden, he thought he could secure by the production of Rienzi. I

accordingly betook myself thither in the month of March. The journey at

that time was not an easy one, as after Hanover one had to proceed by

mail-coach, and the crossing of the Elbe, which was full of floating

ice, was a risky business. Owing to a great fire that had recently

broken out, the town of Hamburg was in process of being rebuilt, and

there were still many wide spaces encumbered with ruins. Cold weather

and an ever-gloomy sky make my recollections of my somewhat prolonged

sojourn in this town anything but agreeable. I was tormented to such an

extent by having to rehearse with bad material, fit only for the

poorest theatrical trumpery, that, worn out and exposed to constant

colds, I spent most of my leisure time in the solitude of my inn

chamber. My earlier experiences of ill-arranged and badly managed

theatres came back to me afresh. I was particularly depressed when I

realised that I had made myself an unconscious accomplice of Director

Cornet’s basest interests. His one aim was to create a sensation, which

he thought should be of great service to me also; and not only did he

put me off with a smaller fee, but even suggested that it should be

paid by gradual instalments. The dignity of scenic decoration, of which

he had not the smallest idea, was completely sacrificed to the most

ridiculous and tawdry showiness. He imagined that pageantry was all

that was really needed to secure my success. So he hunted out all the

old fairy-ballet costumes from his stock, and fancied that if they only

looked gay enough, and if plenty of people were bustling about on the

stage, I ought to be satisfied. But the most sorry item of all was the

singer he provided for the title-role. He was a man of the name of

Wurda, an elderly, flabby and voiceless tenor, who sang Rienzi with the

expression of a lover—like Elvino, for instance, in the Somnanibula. He

was so dreadful that I conceived the idea of making the Capitol tumble

down in the second act, so as to bury him sooner in its ruins, a plan

which would have cut out several of the processions, which were so dear

to the heart of the director. I found my one ray of light in a lady

singer, who delighted me with the fire with which she played the part

of Adriano. This was a Mme. Fehringer, who was afterwards engaged by

Liszt for the role of Ortrud in the production of Lohengrin at Weimar,

but by that time her powers had greatly deteriorated. Nothing could be

more depressing than my connection with this opera under such dismal

circumstances. And yet there were no outward signs of failure. The

manager hoped in any case to keep Rienzi in his repertoire until

Tichatschek was able to come to Hamburg and give the people of that

town a true idea of the play. This actually took place in the following

summer.

My discouragement and ill-humour did not escape the notice of Herr

Cornet, and discovering that I wished to present my wife with a parrot,

he managed to procure a very fine bird, which he gave me as a parting

gift. I carried it with me in its narrow cage on my melancholy journey

home, and was touched to find that it quickly repaid my care and became

very much attached to me. Minna greeted me with great joy when she saw

this beautiful grey parrot, for she regarded it as a self-evident proof

that I should do something in life. We already had a pretty little dog,

born on the day of the first Rienzi rehearsal in Dresden, which, owing

to its passionate devotion to myself, was much petted by all who knew

me and visited my house during those years. This sociable bird, which

had no vices and was an apt scholar, now formed an addition to our

household; and the pair did much to brighten our dwelling in the

absence of children. My wife soon taught the bird snatches of songs

from Rienzi, with which it would good-naturedly greet me from a

distance when it heard me coming up the stairs.

And thus at last my domestic hearth seemed to be established with every

possible prospect of a comfortable competency.

No further excursions for the performance of any of my operas took

place, for the simple reason that no such performances were given. As I

saw it was quite clear that the diffusion of my works through the

theatrical world would be a very slow business, I concluded that this

was probably due to the fact that no adaptations of them for the piano

existed. I therefore thought that I should do well to press forward

such an issue at all costs, and in order to secure the expected

profits, I hit upon the idea of publishing at my own expense. I

accordingly made arrangements with F. Meser, the court music-dealer,

who had hitherto not got beyond the publication of a valse, and signed

an agreement with him for his firm to appear as the nominal publishers

on the understanding that they should receive a commission of ten per

cent, whilst I provided the necessary capital.

As there were two operas to be issued, including Rienzi, a work of

exceptional bulk, it was not likely that these publications would prove

very profitable unless, in addition to the usual piano selections, I

also published adaptations, such as the music without words, for duet

or solo. For this a fairly large capital was necessary. I also needed

funds for the repayment of the loans already mentioned, and for the

settlement of old debts, as well as to pay off the remaining expenses

of my house-furnishing. I was therefore obliged to try and procure much

larger sums. I laid my project and its motive before Schroder-Devrient,

who had just returned to Dresden, at Easter, 1844, to fulfil a fresh

engagement. She believed in the future of my works, recognised the

peculiarity of my position, as well as the correctness of my

calculations, and declared her willingness to provide the necessary

capital for the publication of my operas, refusing to consider the act

as one involving any sacrifice on her part. This money she proposed to

get by selling out her investments in Polish state-bonds, and I was to

pay the customary rate of interest. The thing was so easily done, and

seemed so much a matter of course, that I at once made all needful

arrangements with my Leipzig printer, and set to work on the

publication of my operas.

When the amount of work delivered brought with it a demand for

considerable payments on account, I approached my friend for a first

advance. And here I became confronted with a new phase of that famous

lady’s life, which placed me in a position which proved as disastrous

as it was unexpected. After having broken away from the unlucky Herr

von Munchhausen some time previously, and returned, as it appeared,

with penitential ardour to her former connection with my friend,

Hermann Muller, it now turned out that she had found no real

satisfaction in this fresh relationship. On the contrary, the star of

her being, whom she had so long and ardently desired, had now at last

arisen in the person of another lieutenant of the Guards. With a

vehemence which made light of her treachery to her old friend, she

elected this slim young man, whose moral and intellectual weaknesses

were patent to every eye, as the chosen keystone of her life’s love. He

took the good luck that befell him so seriously, that he would brook no

jesting, and at once laid hands on the fortune of his future wife, as

he considered that it was disadvantageously and insecurely invested,

and thought that he knew of much more profitable ways of employing it.

My friend therefore explained, with much pain and evident

embarrassment, that she had renounced all control over her capital, and

was unable to keep her promise to me.

Owing to this I entered upon a series of entanglements and troubles

which henceforth dominated my life, and plunged me into sorrows that

left their dismal mark on all my subsequent enterprises. It was clear

that I could not now abandon the proposed plan of publication. The only

satisfactory solution of my perplexities was to be found in the

execution of my project and the success which I hoped would attend it.

I was compelled, therefore, to turn all my energies to the raising of

the money wherewith to publish my two operas, to which in all

probability Tannhäuser would shortly have to be added. I first applied

to my friends, and in some cases had to pay exorbitant rates of

interest, even for short terms. For the present these details are

sufficient to prepare the reader for the catastrophe towards which I

was now inevitably drifting.

The hopelessness of my position did not at first reveal itself. There

seemed no reason to despair of the eventual spread of my operatic works

among the theatres in Germany, though my experience of them indicated

that the process would be slow. In spite of the depressing experiences

in Berlin and Hamburg, there were many encouraging signs to be seen.

Above all, Rienzi maintained its position in favour of the people of

Dresden, a place which undoubtedly occupied a position of great

importance, especially during the summer months, when so many strangers

from all parts of the world pass through it. My opera, which was not to

be heard anywhere else, was in great request, both among the Germans

and other visitors, and was always received with marked approbation,

which surprised me very much. Thus a performance of Rienzi, especially

in summer, became quite a Dionysian revelry, whose effect upon me could

not fail to be encouraging.

On one occasion Liszt was among the number of these visitors. As Rienzi

did not happen to be in the repertoire when he arrived, he induced the

management at his earnest request to arrange a special performance. I

met him between the acts in Tichatschek’s dressing-room, and was

heartily encouraged and touched by his almost enthusiastic

appreciation, expressed in his most emphatic manner. The kind of life

to which Liszt was at that time condemned, and which bound him to a

perpetual environment of distracting and exciting elements, debarred us

from all more intimate and fruitful intercourse. Yet from this time

onward I continued to receive constant testimonies of the profound and

lasting impression I had made upon him, as well as of his sympathetic

remembrance of me. From various parts of the world, wherever his

triumphal progress led him, people, chiefly of the upper classes, came

to Dresden for the purpose of hearing Rienzi. They had been so

interested by Liszt’s reports of my work, and by his playing of various

selections from it, that they all came expecting something of

unparalleled importance.

Besides these indications of Liszt’s enthusiastic and friendly

sympathy, other deeply touching testimonies appeared from different

quarters. The startling beginning made by Werder, on the occasion of

his midnight visit after the second performance of the Fliegender

Holländer in Berlin, was shortly afterwards followed by a similarly

unsolicited approach in the form of an effusive letter from an equally

unknown personage, Alwino Frommann, who afterwards became my faithful

friend. After my departure from Berlin she heard Schroder-Devrient

twice in the Fliegender Holländer, and the letter in which she

described the effect produced upon her by my work conveyed to me for

the first time the vigorous and profound sentiments of a deep and

confident recognition such as seldom falls to the lot of even the

greatest master, and cannot fail to exercise a weighty influence on his

mind and spirit, which long for self-confidence.

I have no very vivid recollections of my own doings during this first

year of my position as conductor in a sphere of action which gradually

grew more and more familiar. For the anniversary of my appointment, and

to some extent as a personal recognition, I was commissioned to procure

Gluck’s Armida. This we performed in March, 1843, with the co-operation

of Schroder-Devrient, just before her temporary departure from Dresden.

Great importance was attached to this production, because, at the same

moment, Meyerbeer was inaugurating his general-directorship in Berlin

by a performance of the same work. Indeed, it was in Berlin that the

extraordinary respect entertained for such a commemoration of Gluck had

its origin. I was told that Meyerbeer went to Rellstab with the score

of Armida in order to obtain hints as to its correct interpretation.

As not long afterwards I also heard a strange story of two silver

candlesticks, wherewith the famous composer was said, to have

enlightened the no less famous critic when showing him the score of his

Feldlager in Schlesien, I decided to attach no great importance to the

instructions he might have received, but rather to help myself by a

careful handling of this difficult score, and by introducing some

softness into it through modulating the variations in tone as much as

possible. I had the gratification later of receiving an exceedingly

warm appreciation of my rendering from Herr Eduard Devrient, a great

Gluck connoisseur. After hearing this opera as presented by us, and

comparing it with the Berlin performance, he heartily praised the

tenderly modulated character of our rendering of certain parts, which,

he said, had been given in Berlin with the coarsest bluntness. He

mentioned, as a striking instance of this, a brief chorus in C major of

male and female nymphs in the third act. By the introduction of a more

moderate tempo and very soft piano I had tried to free this from the

original coarseness with which Devrient had heard it rendered in

Berlin—presumably with traditional fidelity. My most innocent device,

and one which I frequently adopted, for disguising the irritating

stiffness or the orchestral movement in the original, was a careful

modification of the Basso-continuo, which was taken uninterruptedly in

common time. This I felt obliged to remedy, partly by legato playing,

and partly by pizzicato.

Our management were lavish in their expenditure on externals,

especially decoration, and as a spectacular opera the piece drew fairly

large houses, thus earning me the reputation of being a very suitable

conductor for Gluck, and one who was in close sympathy with him. This

result was the more conspicuous from the fact that Iphigenia in Tauris

which is a far superior work, and in which Devrient’s interpretation of

the title-role was admirable had been performed to empty houses.

I had to live upon this reputation for a long time, as it often

happened that I was compelled to give inferior performances of

repertoire pieces, including Mozart’s operas. The mediocrity of these

was particularly disappointing to those who, after my success in

Armida, had expected a great deal from my rendering of these pieces,

and were much disappointed in consequence. Even sympathetic hearers

sought to explain their disappointment on the ground that I did not

appreciate Mozart and could not understand him. But they failed to

realise how impossible it was for me, as a mere conductor, to exercise

any real influence on such desultory performances, which were merely

given as stopgaps, and often without rehearsal. Indeed, in this matter

I often found myself in a false position, which, as I was powerless to

remedy it, contributed not a little to render unbearable both my new

office and my dependence upon the meanest motives of a paltry

theatrical routine, already overweighted with the cares of business.

This, in fact, became worse than I had expected, in spite of my

previous knowledge of the precariousness of such a life. My colleague

Reissiger, to whom from time to time I poured out my woes regarding the

scant attention given by the general management to our demands for the

maintenance of correct representations in the realm of opera, comforted

me by saying that I, like himself, would sooner or later relinquish all

these fads and submit to the inevitable fate of a conductor. Thereupon

he proudly smote his stomach, and hoped that I might soon be able to

boast of one as round as his own.

I received further provocation for my growing dislike of these jog-trot

methods from a closer acquaintance with the spirit in which even

eminent conductors undertook the reproduction of our masterpieces.

During this first year Mendelssohn was invited to conduct his St. Paul

for one of the Palm Sunday concerts in the Dresden chapel, which was

famous at that time. The knowledge I thus acquired of this work, under

such favourable circumstances, pleased me so much, that I made a fresh

attempt to approach the composer with sincere and friendly motives; but

a remarkable conversation which I had with him on the evening of this

performance quickly and strangely repelled my impulse. After the

oratorio Reissiger was to produce Beethoven’s Eighth Symphony. I had

noticed in the preceding rehearsal that Keissiger had fallen into the

error of all the ordinary conductors of this work by taking the tempo

di minuetto of the third movement at a meaningless waltz time, whereby

not only does the whole piece lose its imposing character, but the trio

is rendered absolutely ridiculous by the impossibility of the

violoncello part being interpreted at such a speed. I had called

Reissiger’s attention to this defect, and he acquiesced in my opinion,

promising to take the part in question at true minuetto tempo. I

related this to Mendelssohn, when he was resting after his own

performance in the box beside me, listening to the symphony. He, too,

acknowledged that I was right, and thought that it ought to be played

as I said. And now the third movement began. Reissiger, who, it is

true, did not possess the needful power suddenly to impress so

momentous a change of time upon his orchestra with success, followed

the usual custom and took the tempo di minuetto in the same old waltz

time. Just as I was about to express my anger, Mendelssohn gave me a

friendly nod, as though he thought that this was what I wanted, and

that I had understood the music in this way. I was so amazed by this

complete absence of feeling on the part of the famous musician, that I

was struck dumb, and thenceforth my own particular opinion of

Mendelssohn gradually matured, an opinion which was afterwards

confirmed by R. Schumann. The latter, in expressing the sincere

pleasure he had felt on listening to the time at which I had taken the

first movement of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, told me that he had been

compelled to hear it year after year taken by Mendelssohn at a

perfectly distracting speed.

Amid my yearning anxiety to exert some influence upon the spirit in

which our noblest masterpieces were executed, I had to struggle against

the profound dissatisfaction I felt with my employment on the ordinary

theatre repertoire. It was not until Palm Sunday of the year 1844, just

after my dispiriting expedition to Hamburg, that my desire to conduct

the Pastoral Symphony was satisfied. But many faults still remained

unremedied, and for the removal of these I had to adopt indirect

methods which gave me much trouble. For instance, at these famous

concerts the arrangement of the orchestra, the members of which were

seated in a long, thin, semicircular row round the chorus of singers,

was so inconceivably stupid that it required the explanation given by

Reissiger to make me understand such folly. He told me that all these

arrangements dated from the time of the late conductor Morlacchi, who,

as an Italian composer of operas, had no true realisation of the

importance of the orchestra nor of its necessities. When, therefore, I

asked why they had permitted him to meddle with things he did not

understand, I learned that the preference shown to this Italian, both

by the court and the general management, even in opposition to Carl

Maria von Weber, had always been absolute and brooked no contradiction.

I was warned that, even now, we should experience great difficulty in

ridding ourselves of these inherited vices, because the opinion still

prevailed in the highest circles that he must have understood best what

he was about.

Once more my childish memories of the eunuch Sassaroli flashed through

my mind, and I remembered the warning of Weber’s widow as to the

significance of my succession to her husband’s post of conductor in

Dresden. But, in spite of all this, our performance of the Pastoral

Symphony succeeded beyond expectation, and the incomparable and

wonderfully stimulating enjoyment, which I was in future to derive from

my intercourse with Beethoven’s works, now first enabled me to realise

his prolific strength. Kockel shared in this enjoyment with heartfelt

sympathy; he supported me with eye and ear at every rehearsal, always

stood by my side, and was at one with me both in his appreciation and

his aims.

After this encouraging success I was to receive the gratification of

another triumph in the summer, which, although it was of no particular

moment from the musical point of view, was of great social importance.

The King of Saxony, towards whom, as I have already said, I had felt

warmly drawn when he was Prince Friedrich, was expected home from a

long visit to England. The reports received of his stay there had

greatly rejoiced my patriotic soul. While this homely monarch, who

shrank from all pomp and noisy demonstration, was in England, it

happened that the Tsar Nicholas arrived quite unexpectedly on a visit

to the Queen. In his honour great festivities and military reviews were

held, in which our King, much against his will, was obliged to

participate, and he was consequently compelled to receive the

enthusiastic acclamations of the English crowd, who were most

demonstrative in showing their preference for him, as compared with the

unpopular Tsar. This preference was also reflected in the newspapers,

so that a flattering incense floated over from England to our little

Saxony which filled us all with a peculiar pride in our King. While I

was in this mood, which absorbed me completely, I learned that

preparations were being made in Leipzig for a special welcome to the

King on his return, which was to be further dignified by a musical

festival in the directing of which Mendelssohn was to take part. I made

inquiries as to what was going to be done in Dresden, and learned that

the King did not propose to call there at all, but was going direct to

his summer residence at Pillnitz.

A moment’s reflection showed me that this would only further my desire

of preparing a pleasant and hearty reception for his Majesty. As I was

a servant of the Crown, any attempt on my part to render an act of

homage in Dresden might have had the appearance of an official parade

which would not be admissible. I seized the idea, therefore, of

hurriedly collecting together all who could either play or sing, so

that we might perform a Reception song hastily composed in honour of

the event. The obstacle to my plan was that my Director Lüttichau was

away at one of his country seats. To come to an understanding with my

colleague Reissiger would, moreover, have involved delay, and given the

enterprise the very aspect of an official ovation which I wished to

avoid. As no time was to be lost, if anything worthy of the occasion

was to be done—as the King was due to arrive in a few days—I availed

myself of my position as conductor of the Glee Club, and summoned all

its singers and instrumentalists to my aid. In addition to these, I

invited the members of our theatrical company, and also those of the

orchestra, to join us. This done, I drove quickly to Pillnitz to

arrange matters with the Lord Chamberlain, whom I found favourably

disposed towards my project. The only leisure I could snatch for

composing the verses of my song and setting them to music was during

the rapid drive there and back, for by the time I reached home I had to

have every thing ready for the copyist and lithographer. The agreeable

sensation of rushing through the warm summer air and lovely country,

coupled with the sincere affection with which I was inspired for our

German Prince, and which had prompted my effort, elated me and worked

me up to a high pitch of tension, in which I now formed a clear

conception of the lyrical outlines of the ‘Tannhäuser March,’ which

first saw the light of day on the occasion of this royal welcome. I

soon afterwards developed this theme, and thus produced the march which

became the most popular of the melodies I had hitherto composed.

On the next day it had to be tried over with a hundred and twenty

instrumentalists and three hundred singers. I had taken the liberty of

inviting them to meet me on the stage of the Court Theatre, where

everything went off capitally. Every one was delighted, and I not the

least so, when a messenger arrived from the director, who had just

returned to town, requesting an immediate interview. Littichau was

enraged beyond measure at my high-handed proceedings in this matter, of

which he had been informed by our good friend Reissiger. If his

baronial coronet had been on his head during this interview, it would

assuredly have tumbled off. The fact that I should have conducted my

negotiations in person with the court officials, and could report that

my endeavours had met with extraordinarily prompt success, aroused his

deepest fury, for the chief importance of his own position consisted in

always representing everything which had to be obtained by these means

as surrounded by the greatest obstacles, and hedged in by the strictest

etiquette. I offered to cancel everything, but that only embarrassed

him the more. I thereupon asked him what he wanted me to do, if the

plan was still to be carried out. On this point he seemed uncertain,

but thought I had shown a great lack of fellow-feeling in having not

only ignored him, but Reissiger as well. I answered that I was

perfectly ready to hand over my composition and the conducting of the

piece to Reissiger. But he could not swallow this, as he really had an

exceedingly poor opinion of Reissiger, of which I was very well aware.

His real grievance was that I had arranged the whole business with the

Lord Chamberlain, Herr von Reizenstein, who was his personal enemy, and

he added that I could form no conception of the rudeness he had been

obliged to endure from the hands of this official. This outburst of

confidence made it easier for me to exhibit an almost sincere emotion,

to which he responded by a shrug of the shoulders, meaning that he must

resign himself to a disagreeable necessity.

But my project was even more seriously threatened by the wretched

weather than by this storm with the director; for it rained all day in

torrents. If it lasted, which it seemed only too likely to do, I could

hardly start on the special boat at five o’clock in the morning, as

proposed, with my hundreds of helpers, to give an early morning concert

at Pillnitz, two hours away. I anticipated such a disaster with genuine

dismay. But Röckel consoled me by saying that I could rely upon it that

we should have glorious weather the next day; for I was lucky! This

belief in my luck has followed me ever since, even down to my latest

days; and amid the great misfortunes which have so often hampered my

enterprises, I have felt as if this statement were a wicked insult to

fate. But this time, at least, my friend was right; the 12th of August,

1844 was from sunrise till late at night the most perfect summer day

that I can remember in my whole life. The sensation of blissful content

with which I saw my light-hearted legion of gaily dressed bandsmen and

singers gathering through the auspicious morning mists on board our

steamer, swelled my breast with a fervent faith in my lucky star.

By my friendly impetuosity I had succeeded in overcoming Reissiger’s

smouldering resentment, and had persuaded him to share the honour of

our undertaking by conducting the performance of my composition

himself. When we arrived at the spot, everything went off splendidly.

The King and royal family were visibly touched, and in the evil times

that followed the Queen of Saxony spoke of this occasion, I am told,

with peculiar emotion, as the fairest day of her life. After Reissiger

had wielded his baton with great dignity, and I had sung with the

tenors in the choir, we two conductors were summoned to the presence of

the royal family. The King warmly expressed his thanks, while the Queen

paid us the high compliment of saying that I composed very well and

that Reissiger conducted very well. His Majesty asked us to repeat the

last three stanzas only, as, owing to a painful ulcerated tooth, he

could not remain much longer out of doors. I rapidly devised a combined

evolution, the remarkably successful execution of which I am very

proud, even to this day. I had the entire song repeated, but, in

accordance with the King’s wish, only one verse was sung in our

original crescent formation. At the beginning of the second verse I

made my four hundred undisciplined bandsmen and singers file off in a

march through the garden, which, as they gradually receded, was so

arranged that the final notes could only reach the royal ear as an

echoing dream-song. Thanks to my unexampled activity and ever-present

help, this retreat was so steadily carried out that not the slightest

faltering was perceptible either in time or delivery, and the whole

might have been taken for a carefully rehearsed theatrical manœuvre. On

reaching the castle court we found that, by the Queen’s kindly

forethought, an ample breakfast had been provided for our party on the

lawn, where the tables were already spread. We often saw our royal

hostess herself busily supervising the attendants, or moving with

excited delight about the windows and corridors of the castle. Every

eye beamed rapture to my soul, as the successful author of the general

happiness, and I almost felt amid the glories of that day as though the

millennium had been proclaimed. After roaming in a body through the

lovely grounds of the castle, and not omitting to pay a visit to the

Keppgrund which had been so dear to me in my youth, we returned late at

night, and in the highest spirits, to Dresden.

Next morning I was again summoned to the presence of the director. But

a change had come over him during the night.

As I began to offer my apologies for the anxiety I had caused him, the

tall thin man, with the hard dry face, seized me by the hand and

addressed me with a rapturous expression, which I am sure no one else

ever saw on his face. He told me to say no more about these anxieties.

I was a great man, and soon no one would know anything about him,

whereas I should be universally admired and loved. I was deeply moved,

and wished only to express my embarrassment at so unexpected an

outburst, when he kindly interrupted me and sought an escape from his

own emotion in good-humoured confidences. He referred, with a smile, to

the self-denial which had yielded the place of honour on so

extraordinary an occasion to an undeserving man like Reissiger. When I

assured him that this act had afforded me the liveliest satisfaction,

and that I had myself persuaded my colleague to take the baton, he

confessed that at last he began to understand me, but failed altogether

to comprehend how the other could accept a position to which he had no

right.

Lüttichau’s altered attitude towards me was such that for some time our

intercourse on matters of business assumed an almost confidential tone.

But, unfortunately, in course of time things changed for the worse, so

that our relationship became one of open enmity; nevertheless, a

certain peculiar tenderness towards me on the part of this singular man

was always clearly perceptible. Indeed, I might almost say that much of

his subsequent abuse of me sounded more like the strangely perverted

plaints of a love that met with no response.

For my holiday this year I went, early in September, to Fischer’s

vineyard, near Loschwitz, not far from the famous Firidlater vineyard,

where, somewhat late in the year, I rented a summer residence. Where

under the kindly and strengthening stimulus of six week of open-air

life, I composed my music for the second act of Tannhäuser, which I

completed by the 15th of October. During this period a performance of

Rienzi was given before an audience of no ordinary importance. For this

event I went up to town. Spontini, Meyerbeer, and General Lwoff, the

composer of the Russian National Anthem, were seated together in a

stage box. I sought no opportunity of learning the impression made by

my opera upon these learned judges and magnates of the musical world.

It was enough for me to have the complacent satisfaction of knowing

that they had heard my oft-repeated work performed before a crowded

house and amid overwhelming applause. I was delighted at the close of

the opera to have my little dog Peps, which had run after me all the

way from the country, brought to me; and without waiting to greet the

European celebrities, I drove off with it at once to our quiet

vineyard, where Minna was greatly relieved to recover her little pet,

which for hours she had believed to be lost.

Here I also received a visit from Werder, the man whose friendship I

had made in Berlin under such dramatic circumstances. But this time he

appeared in ordinary human guise, beneath the kindly light of heaven,

by which we disputed in a friendly way concerning the true worth of the

Fliegender Holländer, my mind having somewhat turned against this work

since Tannhäuser had got into my head. It certainly seemed odd to find

myself contradicted on this point by my friend, and to receive

instruction from him on the significance of my own work.

When we returned to our winter quarters I tried to avoid allowing so

lengthy an interval to elapse between the composition of the second and

third acts as had separated that of the first and second. In spite of

many absorbing engagements I succeeded in my aim. By carefully

cultivating a habit of taking solitary walks, and thanks to their

soothing influence over me, I managed to finish the music of Act iii.

by the 29th of December, that is to say, before the end of the year.

During this period my time was otherwise very seriously occupied by a

visit paid us by Spontini with reference to a proposed presentation of

his Vestalin, the preparation for which had just begun. The singular

episodes and characteristic features of the intercourse which I thus

gained with this eminent and hoary-headed master are still so vividly

imprinted on my memory that they seem worthy of a place in this record.

Since, with the co-operation of Schroder-Devrient, we could, on the

whole, rely upon an admirable presentation of the opera, I had inspired

Lüttichau with the idea of inviting Spontini to undertake the personal

superintendence of his justly famous work. He had just left Berlin for

ever, after enduring great humiliation there, and such an invitation at

this moment would be a well-timed proof of respect. This was

accordingly sent, and as I had myself been entrusted with the

conductorship of the opera, I was given the singular task of deciding

this point with the master. My letter, it appears, although written in

French, inspired him with a high opinion of my zeal for the enterprise,

and in a gracious reply he informed me what his special wishes were

regarding the arrangements to be made for his collaboration. As far as

the vocalists were concerned, and seeing that a Schroder-Devrient was

among the number, he frankly expressed his satisfaction. As for chorus

and ballet, he took it for granted that nothing would be lacking to the

dignity of the performance; and finally, as regarded the orchestra, he

expected that this also would be sure to please him, as he presumed it

contained the necessary complement of excellent instruments which, to

use his own words, ‘he hoped would furnish the performance with twelve

good contrabass!’ (le tout garni de douze bonnes contre-basses). This

phrase bowled me over, for the proportion thus bluntly stated in

figures gave me so logical a conception of his exalted expectations,

that I hurried away at once to the director to warn him that the

enterprise on which we had embarked would not, after all, prove as easy

as we thought. His alarm was great, and he said that some plan must at

once be devised for breaking off the engagement.

When Schroder-Devrient heard of our dilemma, knowing Spontini well, she

laughed as though she would never stop at the ingenuous impudence with

which we had issued our invitation. A trifling indisposition from which

she then suffered provided a reasonable excuse for a delay, more or

less prolonged, and this she generously placed at our disposal.

Spontini had, in fact, urged us to use all possible despatch in the

execution of our project, for, as he was impatiently awaited in Paris,

he could spare us but little time. It fell to my lot to weave the

tissue of innocent deceptions by which we hoped to divert the master

from a definite acceptance of our invitation. Now we could breathe

again, and duly began rehearsing. But on the very day before we

proposed to hold our full-dress rehearsal at our leisure, lo and

behold! about noon a carriage drove up to my door, in which, clad in a

long blue coat of pilot-cloth, sat no other than the haughty master

himself, whose manners resembled those of a Spanish grandee. All

unattended and greatly excited, he entered my room, showed me my

letters, and proved from our correspondence that the invitation had not

been declined, but that he had in all points accurately complied with

our wishes. Forgetting for the moment all the possible embarrassments

which might arise, in my genuine delight at beholding the wonderful man

before me, and hearing his work conducted by himself, I at once

undertook to do everything I possibly could to meet his desires. This

declaration I made with the utmost sincerity of zeal. He smiled with

almost childlike kindliness on hearing me, and I at once begged him to

conduct the rehearsal arranged for the morrow. He thereupon grew

suddenly thoughtful, and began to weigh the numerous disadvantages of

such an action on his part. So acute did his agitation become that he

had the greatest difficulty in expressing himself clearly on any point,

and I found it no easy matter to inquire what arrangements on our part

would persuade him to undertake the morrow’s rehearsal. After a

moment’s reflection he asked what sort of baton I was accustomed to use

when conducting. With my hands I indicated the approximate length and

thickness of a medium-sized wooden rod, such as our choir-attendant was

in the habit of supplying, freshly covered with white paper. He sighed,

and asked if I thought it possible to procure him by to-morrow a baton

of black ebony, whose very respectable length and thickness he

indicated by a gesture, and on each end of which a fairly large knob of

ivory was to be affixed. I promised to have one prepared for the next

rehearsal, which should at least be similar in appearance to what he

desired, and another of the specified materials in time for the actual

performance. Visibly relieved, he then passed his hand over his brow,

and granted me permission to announce his consent to conduct on the

following day. After once more strongly enforcing his instructions as

to the baton, he went back to his hotel.

I seemed to be moving in a dream, and hastened in a whirl-wind of

excitement to publish the news of what had happened and was to be

expected. We were fairly trapped. Schroder-Devrient offered to become

our scapegoat, while I entered into precise details with the theatre

carpenter concerning the baton. This turned out so far correct that it

possessed the requisite length and breadth, was black in its colour,

and had two large white knobs. Then came the fateful rehearsal.

Spontini was evidently ill at ease on his seat in the orchestra. First

of all he wished to have the oboists placed behind him. As this partial

change of position just at that moment would have caused much confusion

in the disposition of the orchestra, I promised to effect the

alteration after the rehearsal. He said no more, and took up his baton.

In a moment I understood why he attached such importance to its form

and size. He held it, not as other conductors do, by the end, but

gripped it about the middle with his clenched fist, waving it so as to

make it evident that he wielded his baton like a field-marshal’s staff,

not for beating time, but for command.

Confusion arose in the very first scene, which was increased by the

fact that the master’s instructions, both to orchestra and singers,

were rendered almost unintelligible by his confused use of the German

language. This much at least we were soon able to grasp, that he was

particularly anxious to disabuse us of the idea that this was a

full-dress rehearsal, and to show us that he was set upon a thorough

re-study of the opera from the very beginning. Great, indeed, was the

despair of my good old chorus-master and stage manager, Fischer—who

before had enthusiastically advocated the invitation of Spontini—when

he recognised that the dislocation of our repertoire was now

inevitable. This feeling swelled by degrees to open anger, in the

blindness of which every fresh suggestion of Spontini’s appeared but

frivolous fault-finding, to which he bluntly responded in the coarsest

German. After one of the choruses Spontini beckoned me to his side and

whispered: ‘Mais savez-vous, vos choeurs ne chantent pas mal’;

whereupon Fischer, regarding this with suspicion, shouted out to me in

a rage: ‘What does the old hog want now?’ and I had some trouble to

pacify the speedily converted enthusiast.

But our most serious delay arose, during the first act, through the

evolutions of a triumphal march. With the most vociferous emphasis the

master expressed intense dissatisfaction with the apathetic demeanour

of our populace during the procession of vestal virgins. He was quite

unaware of the fact that, in obedience to our stage manager’s

instructions, they had fallen on their knees upon the appearance of the

priestesses; for he was so excited, and withal so terribly

short-sighted, that nothing which appealed to the eye alone was

perceptible to his senses. What he demanded was that the Roman army

should manifest its devout respect in more drastic fashion by flinging

themselves as one man to the ground, and marking this by delivering a

crashing blow of their spears on their shields. Endless attempts were

made, but some one always clattered either too soon or too late. Then

he repeated the action himself several times with his baton on the

desk, but all to no purpose; the crash was not sufficiently sharp and

emphatic. This reminded me of the impression made upon me some years

before in Berlin by the wonderful precision and almost alarming effect

with which I had seen similar evolutions carried out in the play of

Ferdinand Cortez, and I realized that it would require an immediate and

tedious accentuation of our customary softness of action in such

maneouvres before we could meet the fastidious master’s requirements.

At the end of the first act Spontini went on the stage himself, in

order to give a detailed explanation of his reasons for wishing to

defer his opera for a considerable time, so as to prepare by

multitudinous rehearsals for its production in accordance with his

taste. He expected to find the actors of the Dresden Court Theatre

gathered there to hear him; but the company had already dispersed.

Singers and stage manager had hastily scattered in every direction to

give vent, each in his own fashion, to the misery of the situation.

None but the workmen, lamp-cleaners, and a few of the chorus gathered

in a semicircle around Spontini, in order to have a look at that

remarkable man, as he held forth with wonderful effect on the

requirements of true theatrical art. Turning towards the dismal scene,

I gently and respectfully pointed out to Spontini the uselessness of

his declamation, and promised that everything should eventually be done

precisely as he desired.

Finally, I succeeded in extricating him from the undignified position

in which, to my horror, he had been placed, by telling him that Herr

Eduard Devrient, who had seen the Vestalin in Berlin, and carried every

detail of the performance in his mind, should personally drill our

chorus and supers into a becoming solemnity during the reception of the

vestals. This pacified him, and we proceeded to settle on a plan for a

series of rehearsals according to his wishes. But, in spite of all

this, I was the only person to whom this strange turn of affairs was

not unwelcome; for through the burlesque extravagances of Spontini, and

notwithstanding his extraordinary eccentricities, which, however, I

learned in time to understand, I could perceive the miraculous energy

with which he pursued and attained an ideal of theatrical art such as

in our days had become almost unknown.

We began, therefore, with a pianoforte rehearsal, at which the master

made a point of telling the singers what he wanted. He did not tell us

anything new, however, for he said little about the details of the

rendering; on the other hand, he expatiated upon the general

interpretation, and I noticed that in doing this, he had accustomed

himself to make the most decided allowances for the great singers,

especially Schroder-Devrient and Tichatschek. The only thing he did was

to forbid the latter to use the word Braut (bride) with which Licinius

had to address Julia in the German translation; this word sounded

horrible in his ears, and he could not understand how anybody could set

such a vulgar sound as that to music. He gave a long lecture, however,

to the somewhat coarse and less talented singer who took the part of

the high-priest, and explained to him how to understand and interpret

this character from the dialogue (in recitative) between him and

Haruspex. He told him that he must understand that the whole thing was

based upon priestcraft and superstition. Pontifex must make it clear

that he does not fear his antagonist at the head of the Roman army,

because, should the worst come to the worst, he has his machines ready,

which, if necessary, will miraculously rekindle the dead fire of Vesta.

In this way, even though Julia should escape the sacrifice, the power

of the priesthood would still be unassailable.

During one of the rehearsals I asked Spontini why he, who, as a rule,

made such very effective use of the trombone, should have left it

entirely out in the magnificent triumphal march of the first act. Very

much astonished he asked: ‘Est-ce que je n’ai pas de trombones?’ I

showed him the printed score, and he then asked me to add the trombones

to the march, so that, if possible, they might be used at the next

rehearsal. He also said: ‘J’ai entendu dans votre Rienzi un instrument,

que vous appelez Basse-tuba; je ne veux pas bannir cet instrument de

l’orchestre: faites m’en une partie pour la Vestale.’ It gave me great

pleasure to perform this task for him with all the care and good

judgment I could dispose of. When at the rehearsal he heard the effect

for the first time, he threw me a really grateful glance, and so much

appreciated the really simple additions I had made to his score, that a

little later on he wrote me a very friendly letter from Paris in which

he asked me kindly to send him the extra instrumental parts I had

prepared for him. His pride would not allow him, however, to ask

outright for something for which I alone had been responsible, so he

wrote: ‘Envoyez-moi une partition des trombones pour la marche

triomphale et de la Basse-tuba telle qu’elle a ete executee sous ma

direction a Dresde.’ Apart from this, I also showed how greatly I

respected him, in the eagerness with which, at his special request, I

regrouped all the instruments in the orchestra. He was forced to this

request more by habit than by principle, and how very important it

seemed to him not to make the slightest change in his customary

arrangements, was proved to me when he explained his method of

conducting. He conducted the orchestra, so he said, only with his eyes:

‘My left eye is the first violin, my right eye the second, and if the

eye is to have power, one must not wear glasses (as so many bad

conductors do), even if one is short-sighted. I,’ he admitted

confidentially, ‘cannot see twelve inches in front of me, but all the

same I can make them play as I want, merely by fixing them with my

eye.’ In some respects the arbitrary way in which he used to arrange

his orchestra was really very irrational. From his old days in Paris he

had retained the habit of placing the two oboists immediately behind

him, and although this was a fad which owed its origin to a mere

accident, it was one to which he always adhered. The consequence was

that these players had to avert the mouthpiece of their instruments

from the audience, and our excellent oboist was so angry about this

arrangement, that it was only by dint of great diplomacy that I

succeeded in pacifying him.

Apart from this, Spontini’s method was based upon the absolutely

correct system (which even at the present time is misunderstood by some

German orchestras) of spreading the string quartette over the whole

orchestra. This system further consisted in preventing the brass and

percussion instruments from culminating in one point (and drowning each

other) by dividing them on both sides, and by placing the more delicate

wind instruments at a judicious distance from each other, thus forming

a chain between the violins. Even some great and celebrated orchestras

of the present day still retain the custom of dividing the mass of

instruments into two halves, the string and the wind instruments, an

arrangement that denotes roughness and a lack of understanding of the

sound of the orchestra, which ought to blend harmoniously and be well

balanced.

I was very glad to have the chance of introducing this excellent

improvement in Dresden, for now that Spontini himself had initiated it,

it was an easy matter to get the King’s command to let the alteration

stand. Nothing remained after Spontini’s departure but to modify and

correct certain eccentricities and arbitrary features in his

arrangements; and from that moment I attained a high level of success

with my orchestra.

With all the peculiarities he showed at rehearsals, this exceptional

man fascinated both musicians and singers to such an extent that the

production attracted quite an unusual amount of attention. Very

characteristic was the energy with which he insisted on exceptionally

sharp rhythmic accents; through his association with the Berlin

orchestra he had acquired the habit of marking the note that he wished

to be brought out with the word diese (this), which at first was quite

incomprehensible to me. The great singer Tichatschek, who had a

positive genius for rhythm, was highly pleased by this; for he also had

acquired the habit of compelling the chorus to great precision in very

important entries, and maintained that if one only accentuated the

first note properly, the rest followed as a matter of course. On the

whole, therefore, a spirit of devotion to the master gradually pervaded

the orchestra; the violas alone bore him a grudge for a while, and for

this reason. In the accompaniment of the lugubrious cantilena of Julia

at the end of the second act, he would not put up with the way in which

the violas played the horribly sentimental accompaniment. Suddenly

turning towards them he called in a sepulchral tone, ‘Are the violas

dying?’ The two pale and incurably melancholy old men who held on

tenaciously to their posts in the orchestra, notwithstanding their

right to a pension, stared at Spontini with real fright, reading a

threat in his words, and I had to explain Spontini’s wish in sober

language in order to call them back to life.

On the stage Herr Eduard Devrient helped very materially in bringing

about wonderfully distinct ensembles; he also knew how to gratify a

certain wish of Spontini’s, which threw us all into tremendous

confusion. In accordance with the cuts adopted by all the German

theatres, we too ended the opera with the fiery duet, supported by the

chorus, between Licinius and Julia after their rescue. The master,

however, insisted on adding a lively chorus and ballet to the finale,

according to the antiquated method of ending common to French opera

seria. He was absolutely against finishing his work with a dismal

churchyard episode; consequently the whole scene had to be altered.

Venus was to shine resplendent in a rose bower, and the long-suffering

lovers were to be wedded at her altar, amid lively dancing and singing,

by rose-bedecked priests and priestesses. We performed it like this,

but unluckily not with the success we had all hoped for.

In the course of the production, which was proceeding with wonderful

accuracy and verve, we came across a difficulty with regard to the

principal part for which none of us had been prepared. Our great

Schroder-Devrient was obviously no longer of an age to give the desired

effect as the youngest of the vestal virgins; she had acquired matronly

contours, and her age was moreover accentuated by the extremely

girlish-looking high-priestess with whom she had to act, and whose

youth it was difficult to dissimulate. This was my niece, Johanna

Wagner, who, because of her marvellous voice and great talent as an

actress, made every one in the audience long to see the parts of the

two women reversed. Schroder-Devrient, who was well aware of this fact,

tried by every effective means in her power to overcome her most

difficult position; this effort, however, resulted not infrequently in

great exaggeration and straining of the voice, and in one very

important place her part was sadly overacted. When, after the great

trio in the second act, she had to gasp the words, ‘er ist frei’ (‘he

is free’), and to move away from her rescued lover towards the front of

the stage, she made the mistake of speaking the words instead of

singing them.

She had often proved the effect of a decisive word uttered with an

exaggerated and yet careful imitation of the ordinary accents of the

spoken language, by exciting the audience’s wildest enthusiasm when she

almost whispered the words, ‘Noch einen Schritt und du bist todt!’

(‘Just one more step and thou art dead!’) in Fidelia. This terrific

effect, which I too had felt, was produced by the shock—like unto the

blow of an executioner’s axe—which I received on suddenly coming down

from the ideal sphere to which music itself can exalt the most awful

situations, to the naked surface of dreadful reality. This sensation

was due simply to the knowledge of the utmost height of the sublime,

and the memory of the impression I received led me to call that

particular moment the moment of lightning; for it was as if two

different worlds that meet, and yet are divided, were suddenly

illumined and revealed as by a flash. Thoroughly to understand such a

moment, and not to treat it wrongly, was the whole secret, and this I

fully realised on that day from the absolute failure on the great

singer’s part to produce the right effect. The toneless, hoarse way in

which she uttered the words was like throwing cold water over the

audience and myself, and not one of those present could see any more in

the incident than a botched theatrical effect. It is possible that the

public had expected too much, for they were curious to see Spontini

conduct, and the prices had been raised accordingly; it may also have

been that the whole style of the work, with its antiquated French plot,

seemed rather obsolete in spite of the majestic beauty, of the music;

or, perhaps, the very tame end left the same cold impression as

Devrient’s dramatic failure. In any case there was no real enthusiasm,

and the only sign of approval was a rather lukewarm call for the

celebrated master, who, covered with numerous decorations, made a sad

impression on me as he bowed his thanks to the audience for their very

moderate applause.

Nobody was less blind to the somewhat disappointing result than

Spontini himself. He decided, however, to defy fate, and to this end

had recourse to means which he had often employed in Berlin, in order

to get packed houses for his operatic productions. Thus, he always gave

Sunday performances, for experience had taught him that he could always

have a full house on that day. As the next Sunday on which his Vestalin

was to be produced was still some time ahead, his prolonged stay gave

us several more chances of enjoying his interesting company. I have

such a vivid recollection of the hours spent with him either at Madame

Devrient’s or at my house, that I shall be pleased to quote a few

reminiscences.

I shall never forget a dinner at Schroder-Devrient’s house at which we

had a charming conversation with Spontini and his wife (a sister of the

celebrated pianoforte maker, Erard). Spontini generally listened

deferentially to what the others had to say, his attitude being that of

a man who expected to be asked for his opinion. When he did speak in

the end it was with a sort of rhetorical solemnity, in sharp and

precise sentences, categorical and well accentuated, which forbade

contradiction from the outset. Herr Ferdinand Hiller was among the

invited guests, and he began to speak about Liszt. After some time

Spontini gave his opinion in his characteristic fashion, but in a

spirit which showed only too clearly, that from the heights of his

Berlin throne he had not judged the affairs of the world either with

impartiality or goodwill. While he was laying down the law in this

style he could not brook any interruption. When, therefore, during the

dessert, the general conversation became livelier, and Madame Devrient

happened to laugh with her neighbour at the table in the middle of a

long harangue of Spontini’s, he shot an extremely angry glance at his

wife. Madame Devrient apologised for her at once by saying that it was

she (Madame Devrient) who had been laughing about some lines on a

_bonbonnière_, whereupon Spontini retorted: _‘Pourtant je suis sûr que

c’est ma femme qui a suscité ce rire; je ne veux pas que l’on rie

devant moi, je ne rie jamais moi, j’aime le sérieux.’_ In spite of that

he sometimes succeeded in being jovial. For instance, it amused him to

set us all wondering at the way in which he crunched enormous lumps of

sugar with his marvellous teeth. After dinner, when we drew our chairs

closer together, he usually became very excited.

As far as he was capable of affection he seemed really to like me; he

declared openly that he loved me, and said that he would prove this

best by trying to keep me from the misfortune of proceeding in my

career as a dramatic composer. He said he knew it would be difficult to

convince me of the value of this friendly service, but as he felt it

his sacred duty to look after my happiness in this particular line, he

was prepared to stay in Dresden for another half-year, during which

period he suggested that we should produce his other operas, and

especially _Agnes von Hohenstaufen_, under his direction. To explain

his views about the fatal mistake of trying to succeed as a dramatic

composer ‘after Spontini,’ he began by praising me in these terms:

_‘Quand j’ai entendu votre Rienzi, j’ai dit, c’est un homme de génie,

mais déjà il a plus fait qu’il ne peut faire.’_ In order to show me

what he meant by this paradox, he proceeded as follows: _‘Après Gluck

c’est moi qui ai fait la grande révolution avec la_ Vestale; _j’ai

introduit le_ Vorhalt _de la sexte’_ (the suspension of the sixth)

_‘dans l’harmonie et la grosse caisse dans l’orchestre; avec_ Cortez

_j’ai fait un pas de plus en avant; puis j’ai fait trois pas avec_

Olympic. Nurmahal, Alcidor _et tout ce que j’ai fait dans les premiers

temps à Berlin, je vous les livre, c’étaient des œuvres occasionnelles;

mais depuis j’ai fait cent pas en avant avec_ Agnès de Hohenstaufen,

_où j’ai imaginé un emploi de l’orchestre remplacant parfaitement

l’orgue.’_

Since then he had tried his hand at a new work, Les Atheniennes; the

Crown Prince (now King of Prussia[13]) had urged him to finish this

work, and to testify to the truth of his words, he took several letters

which he had received from this monarch out of his pocket-book, and

handed them to us for inspection. Not until he had insisted upon our

reading them carefully through did he continue by saying that, in spite

of this flattering invitation, he had given up the idea of setting this

excellent subject to music, because he felt sure he could never surpass

his Agnes von Hohenstaufen, nor invent anything new. In conclusion he

said: ‘Or, comment voulez-vous que quiconque puisse inventer quelque

chose de nouveau, moi Spontini declarant ne pouvoir en aucune facon

surpasser mes œuvres precedentes, d’autre part etant avise que depuis

la Vestale il n’a point ete ecrit une note qui ne fut volee de mes

partitions.’

[13] William the First.

To prove that this assertion was not merely talk, but that it was based

on scientific investigations, he quoted his wife, who was supposed to

have read with him an elaborate discussion on the subject by a

celebrated member of the French academy, and he added that the essay in

question had, for some mysterious reason, never been printed. In this

very important and scientific treatise it was proved that without

Spontini’s invention of the suspension of the sixth in his Vestalin,

the whole of modern melody would not have existed, and that any and

every form of melody that had been used since had been borrowed from

his compositions. I was thunderstruck, but hoped all the same to bring

the inexorable master to a better frame of mind, especially in regard

to certain reservations he had made. I acknowledged that the

academician in question was right in many ways, but I asked him if he

did not believe that if somebody brought him a dramatic poem full of an

absolutely new and hitherto unknown spirit, it would not inspire him to

invent new musical combinations? With a ring of compassion in his

voice, he replied that my question was wholly mistaken; in what would

the novelty consist? ‘Dans la Vestale j’ai compose un sujet romain,

dans Ferdinand Cortez un sujet espagnol-mexicain, dans Olympic un sujet

greco-macedonien, enfin dans Agnes de Hohenstaufen un sujet allemand:

tout le reste ne vaut rien!’ He hoped that I was not thinking of the

so-called romantic style a la Freischutz? With such childish stuff no

serious man could have anything to do; for art was a serious thing, and

he had exhausted serious art! And, after all, what nation could produce

the composer who could surpass HIM? Surely not the Italians, whom he

characterised simply as cochons; certainly not the French, who had only

imitated the Italians; nor the Germans, who would never get beyond

their childhood in music, and who, if they had ever possessed any

talent, had had it all spoilt for them by the Jews? ‘Oh, croyez-moi, il

y avait de l’espoir pour l’Allemagne lorsque j’etais empereur de la

musique a Berlin; mais depuis que le roi de Prusse a livre sa musique

au desordre occasionne par les deux juifs errants qu’il a attires, tout

espoir est perdu.’

Our charming hostess now thought it time to change the subject, and to

divert the master’s thoughts. The theatre was situated quite near to

her house; she invited him to go across with our friend Heine, who was

amongst the guests, and to have a look at Antigone, which was then

being given, and which was sure to interest him on account of the

antique equipment of the stage, which had been carried out according to

Semper’s excellent plans. At first he wanted to refuse, on the plea

that he had seen all this so much better when his Olympia had been

performed. After a while he consented; but in a very short time he

returned to his original opinion, and, smiling scornfully, assured us

that he had seen and heard enough to strengthen him in his verdict.

Heine told us that shortly after he and Spontini had taken their seats

in the almost empty amphitheatre, and as soon as the Bacchus chorus had

started, Spontini had said to him: ‘C’est de la Berliner Sing-Academie,

allons-nous-en.’ Through an open door a streak of light had fallen on a

lonely figure behind one of the columns; Heine had recognised

Mendelssohn, and concluded that he had overheard Spontini’s remark.

From the master’s very excited conversations we soon realised very

distinctly that he intended to stay longer in Dresden, so as to get all

his operas performed. It was Schroder-Devrient’s idea to save Spontini,

in his own interest, from the mortifying disappointment of finding all

his enthusiastic hopes in regard to a second performance of Vestalin

unfounded, and, if possible, to prevent this second performance during

his stay in Dresden. She pretended to be ill, and the director

requested me to inform Spontini of the fact that his production would

have to be indefinitely postponed. This visit was so distasteful to me,

that I was glad to make it in Röckel’s company. He was also a friend of

Spontini’s, and his French was moreover much better than mine. As we

were quite prepared for a bad reception, we were really frightened to

enter. Imagine, therefore, our astonishment when we found the master,

who had already been informed of the news in a letter from Devrient, in

the very brightest spirits.

He told us that he had to leave immediately for Paris, and that from

there he was to travel to Rome, the Holy Father having commanded him to

come in order to receive the title of ‘Count of San Andrea.’ Then he

showed us a second document, in which the King of Denmark was supposed

to have raised him to the Danish nobility. This meant, however, only

that the title of ‘Ritter’ of the ‘Elephanten-Order’ had been conferred

upon him; and although this was indeed a high honour, in speaking about

it he only mentioned the word ‘Ritter’ without referring to the

particular order, because this seemed to him too ordinary for a person

of his dignity. He was, however, childishly pleased over the affair,

and felt that he had been miraculously rescued from the narrow sphere

of his Dresden Vestalin production to find himself suddenly transported

into regions of glory, from which he looked down upon the distressing

‘opera’ world with sublime self-content.

Meanwhile Röckel and I silently thanked the Holy Father and the King of

Denmark from the bottom of our hearts. We bode an affectionate farewell

to the strange master, and to cheer him I promised him seriously to

think over his friendly advice with regard to my career as a composer

of opera.

Later on I heard what Spontini had said about me, on hearing that I had

fled from Dresden for political reasons, and had sought refuge in

Switzerland. He thought that this was in consequence of my share in a

plot of high treason against the King of Saxony, whom he looked upon as

my benefactor, because I had been nominated conductor of the royal

orchestra, and he expressed his opinion about me by ejaculating in

tones of the deepest anguish: ‘Quelle ingratitude!’

From Berlioz, who was at Spontini’s deathbed until the end, I heard

that the master had struggled most determinedly against death, and had

cried repeatedly, ‘Je ne veux pas mourir, je ne veux pas mourir!’ When

Berlioz tried to comfort him by saying, ‘Comment pouvez-vous penser

mourir vous, mon maître, qui etes immortel!’ Spontini retorted angrily,

‘Ne faites pas de mauvaises plaisanteries!’ In spite of all the

extraordinary experiences I had had with him, the news of his death,

which I received in Zürich, touched me very deeply. Later on I

expressed my feelings towards him, and my opinion of him as an artist,

in a somewhat condensed form in the Eidgenossischen Zeitung, and in

this article the quality I extolled more particularly in him was that,

unlike Meyerbeer, who was then the rage, and the very aged Rossini, he

believed absolutely in himself and his art. All the same, and somewhat

to my disgust, I could not but see that this belief in himself had

deteriorated into a veritable superstition.

I do not remember in those days having gone deeply into my feelings

about Spontini’s exceedingly strange individuality, nor do I recollect

having troubled to discover how far they were consistent with the high

opinion I formed of him after I had got to know him more intimately.

Obviously I had only seen the caricature of the man, although the

tendency towards such plainly overweening self-confidence may, at all

events, have manifested itself earlier in life. At the same time, one

could trace in all this the influence of the decay of the musical and

dramatic life of the period, which Spontini, situated as he was in

Berlin, was well able to witness. The surprising fact that he saw his

chief merit in unessential details showed plainly that his judgment had

become childish; in my opinion this did not detract from the great

value of his works, however much he might exaggerate their value. In a

sense I could justify his boundless self-confidence, which was

principally the outcome of the comparison between himself and the great

composers who were now replacing him; for in my heart of hearts I

shared the contempt which he felt for these artists, although I did not

dare to say so openly. And thus it came about that, in spite of his

many somewhat absurd idiosyncrasies, I learned during this meeting at

Dresden to feel a deep sympathy for this man, the like of whom I was

never again to meet.

My next experiences of important musical celebrities of this age were

of quite a different character. Amongst the more distinguished of these

was Heinrich Marschner, who, as a very young man, had been nominated

musical director of the Dresden orchestra by Weber. After Weber’s death

he seemed to have hoped that he would take his place entirely, and it

was due less to the fact that his talent was still unknown, than to his

repellent manner, that he was disappointed in his expectations. His

wife, however, suddenly came into some money, and this windfall enabled

him to devote all his energies to his work as composer of operas,

without being obliged to fill any fixed post.

During the wild days of my youth Marschner lived in Leipzig, where his

operas Der Vampir and Templer und Judin saw their first appearance. My

sister Rosalie had once taken me to him in order to hear his opinion

about me. He did not treat me uncivilly, but my visit led to nothing. I

was also present at the first night of his opera Des Falkner’s Braut,

which however was not a success. Then he went to Hanover. His opera

Hans Heiling, which was originally produced in Berlin, I heard for the

first time in Wurzburg; it showed vacillation in its tendency, and a

decrease in constructive power. After that he produced several other

operas, such as Das Schloss am Aetna and Der Babu, which never became

popular. He was always neglected by the management at Dresden, as

though they bore him some grudge, and only his Templer was played at

all often. My colleague, Reissiger, had to conduct this opera, and as

in his absence I always had to take his place, it also fell to my lot

on one occasion to direct a performance of this work.

This was during the time that I worked at my Tannhäuser. I remember

that, although I had often conducted this opera before in Magdeburg, on

this occasion the wild nature of the instrumentation and its lack of

mastership affected me to such an extent that it literally made me ill,

and as soon as he returned, therefore, I implored Reissiger at any cost

to resume the leadership. On the other hand, immediately after my

nomination I had started on the production of Hans Heiling, but merely

for the sake of the artistic honour. The insufficient distribution of

the parts, however, a difficulty which in those days could not be

overcome, made a complete success impossible. In any case, though, the

whole spirit of the work seemed to be terribly old-fashioned.

I now heard that Marschner had finished another opera called Adolph von

Nassau, and in a criticism of this work, of the genuineness of which I

was unable to judge, particular stress was laid upon the ‘patriotic and

noble German atmosphere’ of this new creation. I did my best to make

the Dresden theatre take the initiative, and to urge Lüttichau to

secure this opera before it was produced elsewhere. Marschner, who did

not seem to have been treated with particular consideration by the

Hanoverian opera authorities, accepted the invitation with great joy,

sent his score, and declared himself willing to come to Dresden for the

first performance. Lüttichau, however, was not anxious to see him take

his place at the head of the orchestra; while I, also, was of the

opinion that the too frequent appearance of outside conductors, even if

it were for the purpose of conducting their own works, would not only

lead to confusion, but might also fail to be as amusing and instructive

as Spontini’s visit had proved to be. It was therefore decided that I

should conduct the new opera myself. And how I lived to regret it!

The score arrived: to a weak plot by Karl Golmick the composer of the

Templer had written such superficial music, that the principal effect

lay in a drinking song for a quartette, in which the German Rhine and

German wine played the usual stereotyped part peculiar to such male

quartettes. I lost all courage; but we had to go on with it now, and

all I could do was to try, by maintaining a grave bearing, to make the

singers take an interest in their task; this, however, was not easy. To

Tichatschek and Mitterwurzer were assigned the two principal male

parts; being both eminently musical, they sang everything at first

sight, and after each number looked up at me as if to say, ‘What do you

think of it all?’ I maintained that it was good German music; they must

not allow themselves to get confused. But all they did was to stare at

each other in amazement, not knowing what to make of me. Nevertheless,

in the end they could not stand it any longer, and when they saw that I

still retained my gravity, they burst into loud laughter, in which I

could not help joining.

I now had to take them into my confidence, and make them promise to

follow my lead and pretend to be serious, for it was impossible to give

up the opera at this stage. A Viennese ‘colorature’ singer of the

latest style—Madame Spatser Gentiluomo—who came to us from Hanover, and

on whose services Marschner greatly relied, was rather taken with her

part chiefly because it gave her the chance of showing ‘brilliancy.’

And, indeed, there was a finale in which my ‘German master’ had

actually tried to steal a march on Donizetti. The Princess had been

poisoned by a golden rose, a present from the wicked Bishop of Mainz,

and had become delirious. Adolph von Nassau, with the knights of the

German empire, swears vengeance, and, accompanied by the chorus, pours

out his feelings in a stretta of such incredible vulgarity and

amateurishness that Donizetti would have thrown it at the head of any

of his pupils who had dared to compose such a thing. Marschner now

arrived for the dress rehearsal; he was very pleased, and, without

compelling me to falsehood, he gave me sufficient opportunities for

exercising my powers in the art of concealing my real thoughts. At all

events I must have succeeded fairly well, for he had every reason to

think himself considerately and kindly treated by me.

During the performance the public behaved very much as the singers had

done at the rehearsals. We had brought a still-born child into the

world. But Marschner was comforted by the fact that his drinking

quartette was encored. This was reminiscent of one of Becker’s songs:

Sie sollen ihn nicht haben, den freien deutschen Rhein (‘They shall not

have it, our free German Rhine’). After the performance the composer

was my guest at a supper party at which, I am sorry to say, the

singers, who had had enough of it, would not attend. Herr Ferdinand

Hiller had the presence of mind to insist, in his toast to Marschner,

that ‘whatever one might say, all stress must be laid on the GERMAN

master and GERMAN art.’ Strangely enough, Marschner himself

contradicted him by saying that there was something wrong with German

operatic compositions, and that one ought to consider the singers and

how to write more brilliantly for their voices than he had succeeded in

doing up to the present.

Highly gifted as Marschner was, there can be no doubt that the decline

of his genius was due partly to a tendency which even in the ageing

master himself, as he frankly admitted, was effecting an important and

most salutary change. In later years I met him once more in Paris at

the time of my memorable production of Tannhäuser. I did not feel

inclined to renew the old relations, for, to tell the truth, I wanted

to spare myself the unpleasantness of witnessing the consequences of

his change of views, of which we had seen the beginning in Dresden. I

learned that he was in a state of almost helpless childishness, and

that he was in the hands of a young and ambitious woman, who was trying

to make a last attempt at conquering Paris for him. Among other puff

paragraphs calculated to spread Marschner’s glory, I read one which

said that the Parisians must not believe that I (Wagner) was

representative of German art; no—if only Marschner were given a

hearing, it would be discovered that he was beyond a doubt better

suited to the French taste than I could ever be. Marschner died before

his wife had succeeded in establishing this point.

Ferdinand Hiller, on the other hand, who was in Dresden, behaved in a

very charming and friendly manner, particularly at this time. Meyerbeer

also stayed in the same town from time to time; precisely why, nobody

knew. Once he had rented a little house for the summer near the

Pirnaischer Schlag, and under a pretty tree in the garden of this place

he had had a small piano installed, whereon, in this idyllic retreat,

he worked at his Feldlager in Schlesien. He lived in great retirement,

and I saw very little of him. Ferdinand Hiller, on the contrary, took a

commanding position in the Dresden musical world in so far as this was

not already monopolised by the royal orchestra and its masters, and for

many years he worked hard for its success. Having a little private

capital, he established himself comfortably amongst us, and was soon

known as a delightful host, who kept a pleasant house, which, thanks to

his wife’s influence, was frequented by a numerous Polish colony. Frau

Hiller was indeed an exceptional Jewish woman of Polish origin, and she

was perhaps all the more exceptional seeing that she, in company with

her husband, had been baptized a Protestant in Italy. Hiller began his

career in Dresden with the production of his opera, Der Traum in der

Christnacht. Since the unheard-of fact that Rienzi had been able to

rouse the Dresden public to lasting enthusiasm, many an opera composer

had felt himself drawn towards our ‘Florence on the Elbe,’ of which

Laube once said that as soon as one entered it one felt bound to

apologise because one found so many good things there which one

promptly forgot the moment one departed.

The composer of Der Traum in der Christnacht looked upon this work as a

peculiarly ‘German composition.’ Hiller had set to music a gruesome

play by Raupach, Der Muller und sein Kind (‘The Miller and his Child’),

in which father and daughter, within but a short space of time, both

die of consumption. He declared that he had conceived the dialogue and

the music of this opera in what he called the ‘popular style,’ but this

work met with the same fate as that which, according to Liszt, befell

all his compositions. In spite of his undoubted musical merits, which

even Rossini acknowledged, and whether he gave them in French in Paris

or in Italian in Italy, it was his sad experience always to see his

operas fail. In Germany he had tried the Mendelssohnian style, and had

succeeded in composing an oratorio called Die Zerstorung Jerusalems,

which luckily was not taken notice of by the moody theatre-going

public, and which consequently received the unassailable reputation of

being ‘a solid German work.’ He also took Mendelssohn’s place as

director of the Leipzig Gewandhaus concerts when the latter was called

to Berlin in the capacity of general director. Hiller’s evil fortune

still pursued him, however, and he was unable to retain his position,

everybody being given to understand that it was because his wife was

not sufficiently acknowledged as concert prima-donna. Mendelssohn

returned and made Hiller leave, and Hiller boasted of having quarrelled

with him.

Dresden and the success of my Rienzi now weighed so much upon his mind

that he naturally made another attempt to succeed as an opera composer.

Owing to his great energy, and to his position as son of a rich banker

(a special attraction even to the director of a court theatre), it

happened that he induced them to put aside my poor friend Röckel’s

Farinelli (the production of which had been promised him) in favour of

his (Hiller’s) own work, Der Traum in der Christnacht. He was of the

opinion that next to Reissiger and myself, a man of greater musical

reputation than Röckel was needed. Lüttichau, however, was quite

content to have Reissiger and myself as celebrities, particularly as we

got on so well together, and he remained deaf to Hiller’s wishes. To me

Der Traum in der Christnacht was a great nuisance. I had to conduct it

a second time, and before an empty house. Hiller now saw that he had

been wrong in not taking my advice before, and in not shortening the

opera by one act and altering the end, and he now fancied that he was

doing me a great favour by at last declaring himself ready to act on my

suggestion in the event of another performance of his opera being

possible. I really managed to have it played once more. This was,

however, to be the last time, and Hiller, who had read my book of

Tannhäuser, thought that I had a great advantage over him in writing my

own words. He therefore made me promise to help him with the choice and

writing of a subject for his next opera.

Shortly afterwards Hiller was present at a performance of Rienzi, which

was again given before a crowded and enthusiastic house. When, at the

end of the second act, and after frantic recalls from the audience, I

left the orchestra in a great state of excitement, Hiller, who was

waiting for me in the passage, took the opportunity of adding to his

very hasty congratulations, ‘Do give my Traum once more!’ I promised

him laughingly to do this if I had the chance, but I cannot remember

whether it came off or not. While he was waiting for the creation of an

entirely new plot for his next opera, Hiller devoted himself to the

study of chamber music, to which his large and well-furnished room lent

itself most admirably.

A beautiful and solemn event added to the seriousness of the mood in

which I finished the music to Tannhäuser towards the end of the year,

and neutralised the more superficial impressions made upon me by the

stirring events above described. This was the removal of the remains of

Carl Maria von Weber from London to Dresden in December, 1844. As I

have already said, a committee had for years been agitating for this

removal. From information given by a certain traveller, it had become

known that the insignificant coffin which contained Weber’s ashes had

been disposed of in such a careless way in a remote corner of St.

Paul’s, that it was feared it might soon become impossible to identify

it.

My energetic friend, Professor Lowe, whom I have already mentioned, had

availed himself of this information in order to urge the Dresden Glee

Club, which constituted his hobby, to take the matter in hand. The

concert of male singers arranged to this end had been a fair success

financially, and they now wanted to induce the theatre management to

make similar efforts, when suddenly they met with serious opposition

from this very quarter. The management of the Dresden theatre told the

committee that the King had religious scruples with regard to

disturbing the peace of the dead. However much we felt inclined to

doubt the genuineness of these reasons, nothing could be done, and I

was next approached on the subject, in the hope that my influential

position might lend weight to my appeal. I entered into the spirit of

the enterprise with great fervour. I consented to be made president;

Herr Hofrat Schulz, director of the ‘Antiken-Cabinet,’ who was a

well-known authority on artistic matters, and another gentleman, a

Christian banker, were also elected members of the committee, and the

movement thus received fresh life. Prospectuses were sent round,

exhaustive plans were made, and numerous meetings held. Here, again, I

met with opposition on the part of my chief, Lüttichau; if he could

have done so, he would have forbidden me to move in the matter by

making the most of the King’s scruples referred to above. But he had

had a warning not to pick a quarrel with me after his experience in the

summer, when, contrary to his expectations, the music written by me to

celebrate the King’s arrival had found favour with the monarch. As his

antipathy to the proceedings was not so very serious, Lüttichau must

have seen that even the direct opposition of his Majesty could not have

prevented the enterprise from being carried out privately, and that, on

the contrary, the court would cut a sorry figure if the Royal Court

Theatre (to which Weber once belonged) should assume a hostile

attitude. He therefore tried in a would-be friendly way to make me

desist from furthering the cause, well knowing that, without me, the

plan would fail. He tried to convince me that it would be wrong to pay

this exaggerated honour to Weber’s memory, whereas nobody thought of

removing the ashes of Morlacchi from Italy, although the latter had

given his services to the royal orchestra for a much longer period than

Weber had done. What would be the consequence? By way of argument he

said, ‘Suppose Reissiger died on his journey to some watering-place—his

wife would then be as much justified as was Frau von Weber (who had

annoyed him quite enough already) in expecting her husband’s dead body

to be brought home with music and pomp.’ I tried to calm him, and if I

did not succeed in making him see the difference between Reissiger and

Weber, I managed to make him understand that the affair must take its

course, as the Berlin Court Theatre had already announced a benefit

performance to support our undertaking.

Meyerbeer, to whom my committee had applied, was instrumental in

bringing this about, and a performance of Euryanthe was actually given

which yielded the handsome balance of six thousand marks. A few

theatres of lesser importance now followed our lead. The Dresden Court

Theatre, therefore, could not hold back any longer, and as we now had a

fairly large sum at the bank, we were able to cover the expenses of the

removal, as well as the cost of an appropriate vault and monument; we

even had a nucleus fund for a statue of Weber, which we were to fight

for later on. The elder of the two sons of the immortal master

travelled to London to fetch the remains of his father. He brought them

by boat down the Elbe, and finally arrived at the Dresden

landing-stage, from whence they were to be conducted to German soil.

This last journey of the remains was to take place at night. A solemn

torchlight procession was to be formed, and I had undertaken to see to

the funeral music.

I arranged this from two motives out of Euryanthe, using that part of

the music in the overture which relates to the vision of spirits. I

introduced the Cavatina from Euryanthe—Hier dicht am Quell (‘Here near

the source’), which I left unaltered, except that I transposed it into

B flat major, and I finished the whole, as Weber finished his opera, by

a return to the first sublime motive. I had orchestrated this symphonic

piece, which was well suited to the purpose, for eight chosen wind

instruments, and notwithstanding the volume of sound, I had not

forgotten softness and delicacy of instrumentation. I substituted the

gruesome tremolo of the violas, which appears in that part of the

overture adapted by me, by twenty muffled drums, and as a whole

attained to such an exceedingly impressive effect, especially to us who

were full of thoughts of Weber, that, even in the theatre where we

rehearsed, Schroder-Devrient, who was present, and who had been an

intimate friend of Weber’s, was deeply moved. I had never carried out

anything more in keeping with the character of the subject; and the

procession through the town was equally impressive.

As the very slow tempo, devoid of any strongly marked accents, offered

numerous difficulties, I had had the stage cleared for the rehearsal,

in order to command a sufficient space for the musicians, once they had

thoroughly practised the piece, to walk round me in a circle playing

all the while. Several of those who witnessed the procession from their

windows assured me that the effect of the procession was indescribably

and sublimely solemn. After we had placed the coffin in the little

mortuary chapel of the Catholic cemetery in Friedrichstadt, where

Madame Devrient met it with a wreath of flowers, we performed, on the

following morning, the solemn ceremony of lowering it into the vault.

Herr Hofrat Schulz and myself, as presidents of the committee, were

allowed the honour of speaking by the graveside, and what afforded me

an appropriate subject for the few, somewhat affecting, words which I

had to pronounce, was the fact that, shortly before the removal of

Weber’s remains, the second son of the master, Alexander von Weber, had

died. The poor mother had been so terribly affected by the sudden death

of this youth, so full of life and health, that had we not been in the

very midst of our arrangements, we should have been compelled to

abandon them; for in this new loss the widow saw a judgment of God who,

in her opinion, looked upon the removal of the remains as an act of

sacrilege prompted by vanity. As the public seemed particularly

disposed to hold the same view, it fell to my lot to set the nature of

our undertaking in the proper light before the eyes of the world. And

this I so far succeeded in doing that, to my satisfaction, I learned

from all sides that my justification of our action had received the

most general acceptance.

On this occasion I had a strange experience with regard to myself, when

for the first time in my life I had to deliver a solemn public speech.

Since then I have always spoken extemporarily; this time, however, as

it was my first appearance as an orator, I had written out my speech,

and carefully learned it by heart. As I was thoroughly under the

influence of my subject, I felt so sure of my memory that I never

thought of making any notes. Thanks to this omission, however, I made

my brother Albert very unhappy. He was standing near me at the

ceremony, and he told me afterwards that, in spite of being deeply

moved, he felt at one moment as if he could have sworn at me for not

having asked him to prompt me. It happened in this way: I began my

speech in a clear and full voice, but suddenly the sound of my own

words, and their particular intonation, affected me to such an extent

that, carried away as I was by my own thoughts, I imagined I SAW as

well as HEARD myself before the breathless multitude. While I thus

appeared objectively to myself I remained in a sort of trance, during

which I seemed to be waiting for something to happen, and felt quite a

different person from the man who was supposed to be standing and

speaking there. It was neither nervousness nor absent-mindedness on my

part; only at the end of a certain sentence there was such a long pause

that those who saw me standing there must have wondered what on earth

to think of me. At last my own silence and the stillness round me

reminded me that I was not there to listen, but to speak. I at once

resumed my discourse, and I spoke with such fluency to the very end

that the celebrated actor, Emil Devrient, assured me that, apart from

the solemn service, he had been deeply impressed simply from the

standpoint of a dramatic orator.

The ceremony concluded with a poem written and set to music by myself,

and, though it presented many difficulties for men’s voices, it was

splendidly rendered by some of the best opera singers. Lüttichau, who

was present, was now not only convinced of the justice of the

enterprise, but also strongly in favour of it. I was deeply thankful

that everything had succeeded so well, and when Weber’s widow, upon

whom I called after the ceremony, told me how profoundly she, too, had

been moved, the only cloud that still darkened my horizon was

dispelled. In my youth I had learned to love music through my

admiration for Weber’s genius, and the news of his death was a terrible

blow to me. To have, as it were, come into contact with him again and

after so many years by this second funeral, was an event that stirred

the very depths of my being.

From all the particulars I have given concerning my intimacy with the

great masters who were my contemporaries, it is easy to see at what

sources I had been able to quench my thirst for intellectual

intercourse. It was not a very satisfactory outlook to turn from

Weber’s grave to his living successors; but I had still to find out how

absolutely hopeless this was.

I spent the winter of 1844-5 partly in yielding to attractions from

outside, and partly in indulging in the deepest meditation. By dint of

great energy, and by getting up very early, even in winter, I succeeded

in completing my score to Tannhäuser early in April, having, as already

stated, finished the composition of it at the end of the preceding

year. In writing down the orchestration I made things particularly

difficult for myself by using the specially prepared paper which the

printing process renders necessary, and which involved me in all kinds

of trying formalities. I had each page transferred to the stone

immediately, and a hundred copies printed from each, hoping to make use

of these proofs for the rapid circulation of my work. Whether my hopes

were to be fulfilled or not, I was at all events fifteen hundred marks

out of pocket when all the expenses of the publication were paid.

In regard to this work which called for so many sacrifices, and which

was so slow and difficult, more details will appear in my

autobiography. At all events, when May came round I was in possession

of a hundred neatly bound copies of my first new work since the

production of the Fliegender Holländer, and Hiller, to whom I showed

some parts of it, formed a tolerably good impression of its value.

These plans for rapidly spreading the fame of my Tannhäuser were made

with the hope of a success which, in view of my needy circumstances,

seemed ever more and more desirable. In the course of one year since I

had begun my own publication of my operas, much had been done to this

end. In September of the year 1844 I had presented the King of Saxony

with a special richly bound copy of the complete pianoforte arrangement

of Rienzi, dedicated to his Majesty. The Fliegender Holländer had also

been finished, and the pianoforte arrangement of Rienzi for duet, as

well as some songs selected from both operas, had either been published

or were about to be published. Apart from this I had had twenty-five

copies made of the scores of both these operas by means of the

so-called autographic transfer process, although only from the writing

of the copyists. All these heavy expenses made it absolutely imperative

that I should try to send my scores to the different theatres, and

induce them to produce my operas, as the outlay on the piano scores had

been heavy, and these could only have a sale if my works got to be

known sufficiently well through the theatre.

I now sent the score of my Rienzi to the more important theatres, but

they all returned my work to me, the Munich Court Theatre even sending

it back unopened! I therefore knew what to expect, and spared myself

the trouble of sending my Dutchman. From a speculative business point

of view the situation was this: the hoped-for success of Tannhäuser

would bring in its wake a demand for my earlier works. The worthy

Meser, my agent, who was the music publisher appointed to the court,

had also begun to feel a little doubtful, and saw that this was the

only thing to do. I started at once on the publication of a pianoforte

arrangement of Tannhäuser, preparing it myself while Röckel undertook

the Fliegender Holländer, and a certain Klink did Rienzi.

The only thing that Meser was absolutely opposed to was the title of my

new opera, which I had just named Der Venusberg; he maintained that, as

I did not mix with the public, I had no idea what horrible jokes were

made about this title. He said the students and professors of the

medical school in Dresden would be the first to make fun of it, as they

had a predilection for that kind of obscene joke. I was sufficiently

disgusted by these details to consent to the change. To the name of my

hero, Tannhäuser, I added the name of the subject of the legend which,

although originally not belonging to the Tannhäuser myth, was thus

associated with it by me, a fact which later on Simrock, the great

investigator and innovator in the world of legend, whom I esteemed so

highly, took very much amiss.

Tannhäuser und der Sangerkrieg auf Wartburg should henceforth be its

title, and to give the work a mediaeval appearance I had the words

specially printed in Gothic characters upon the piano arrangement, and

in this way introduced the work to the public.

The extra expenses this involved were very heavy; but I went to great

pains to impress Meser with my belief in the success of my work. So

deeply were we involved in this scheme, and so great were the

sacrifices it had compelled us to make, that there was nothing else for

it but to trust to a special turn of Fortune’s wheel. As it happened,

the management of the theatre shared my confidence in the success of

Tannhäuser. I had induced Lüttichau to have the scenery for Tannhäuser

painted by the best painters of the great opera house in Paris. I had

seen their work on the Dresden stage: it belonged to the style of

German scenic art which was then fashionable, and really gave the

effect of first-class work.

The order for this, as well as the necessary negotiations with the

Parisian painter, Desplechin, had already been settled in the preceding

autumn. The management agreed to all my wishes, even to the ordering of

beautiful costumes of mediaeval character designed by my friend Heine.

The only thing Lüttichau constantly postponed was the order for the

Hall of Song on the Wartburg; he maintained that the Hall for Kaiser

Karl the Great in Oberon, which had only recently been delivered by

some French painters, would answer the purpose just as well. With

superhuman efforts I had to convince my chief that we did not want a

brilliant throne-room, but a scenic picture of a certain character such

as I saw before my mind’s eye, and that it could be painted only

according to my directions. As in the end I became very irritable and

cross, he soothed me by saying that he had no objection to having this

scene painted, and that he would order it to be commenced at once,

adding that he had not agreed immediately, only with the view of making

my joy the greater, because, what one obtained without difficulty, one

rarely appreciated. This Hall of Song was fated to cause me great

trouble later on.

Thus everything was in full swing; circumstances were favourable, and

seemed to cast a hopeful light upon the production of my new work at

the beginning of the autumn season. Even the public was looking forward

to it, and for the first time I saw my name mentioned in a friendly

manner in a communication to the Allgemeine Zeitung. They actually

spoke of the great expectations they had of my new work, the poem of

which had been written ‘with undoubted poetic feeling.’

Full of hope, I started in July on my holiday, which consisted of a

journey to Marienbad in Bohemia, where my wife and I intended to take

the cure. Again I found myself on the ‘volcanic’ soil of this

extraordinary country, Bohemia, which always had such an inspiring

effect on me. It was a marvellous summer, almost too hot, and I was

therefore in high spirits. I had intended to follow the easy-going mode

of life which is a necessary part of this somewhat trying treatment,

and had selected my books with care, taking with me the poems of

Wolfram von Eschenbach, edited by Simrock and San Marte, as well as the

anonymous epic Lohengrin, with its lengthy introduction by Gorres. With

my book under my arm I hid myself in the neighbouring woods, and

pitching my tent by the brook in company with Titurel and Parcival, I

lost myself in Wolfram’s strange, yet irresistibly charming, poem.

Soon, however, a longing seized me to give expression to the

inspiration generated by this poem, so that I had the greatest

difficulty in overcoming my desire to give up the rest I had been

prescribed while partaking of the water of Marienbad.

The result was an ever-increasing state of excitement. Lohengrin, the

first conception of which dates from the end of my time in Paris, stood

suddenly revealed before me, complete in every detail of its dramatic

construction. The legend of the swan which forms such an important

feature of all the many versions of this series of myths that my

studies had brought to my notice, exercised a singular fascination over

my imagination.

Remembering the doctor’s advice, I struggled bravely against the

temptation of writing down my ideas, and resorted to the most strange

and energetic methods. Owing to some comments I had read in Gervinus’s

History of German Literature, both the Meistersinger von Nurnberg and

Hans Sachs had acquired quite a vital charm for me. The Marker alone,

and the part he takes in the Master-singing, were particularly pleasing

to me, and on one of my lonely walks, without knowing anything

particular about Hans Sachs and his poetic contemporaries, I thought

out a humorous scene, in which the cobbler—as a popular

artisan-poet—with the hammer on his last, gives the Marker a practical

lesson by making him sing, thereby taking revenge on him for his

conventional misdeeds. To me the force of the whole scene was

concentrated in the two following points: on the one hand the Marker,

with his slate covered with chalk-marks, and on the other Hans Sachs

holding up the shoes covered with his chalk-marks, each intimating to

the other that the singing had been a failure. To this picture, by way

of concluding the second act, I added a scene consisting of a narrow,

crooked little street in Nuremberg, with the people all running about

in great excitement, and ultimately engaging in a street brawl. Thus,

suddenly, the whole of my Meistersinger comedy took shape so vividly

before me, that, inasmuch as it was a particularly cheerful subject,

and not in the least likely to over-excite my nerves, I felt I must

write it out in spite of the doctor’s orders. I therefore proceeded to

do this, and hoped it might free me from the thrall of the idea of

Lohengrin; but I was mistaken; for no sooner had I got into my bath at

noon, than I felt an overpowering desire to write out Lohengrin, and

this longing so overcame me that I could not wait the prescribed hour

for the bath, but when a few minutes elapsed, jumped out and, barely

giving myself time to dress, ran home to write out what I had in my

mind. I repeated this for several days until the complete sketch of

Lohengrin was on paper.

The doctor then told me I had better give up taking the waters and

baths, saying emphatically that I was quite unfit for such cures. My

excitement had grown to such an extent that even my efforts to sleep as

a rule ended only in nocturnal adventures. Among some interesting

excursions that we made at this time, one to Eger fascinated me

particularly, on account of its association with Wallenstein and of the

peculiar costumes of the inhabitants.

In mid-August we travelled back to Dresden, where my friends were glad

to see me in such good spirits; as for myself, I felt as if I had

wings. In September, when all our singers had returned from their

summer holidays, I resumed the rehearsals of Tannhäuser with great

earnestness. We had now got so far, at least with the musical part of

the performance, that the possible date of the production seemed quite

close at hand. Schroder-Devrient was one of the first to realise the

extraordinary difficulties which the production of Tannhäuser would

entail. And, indeed, she saw these difficulties so clearly that, to my

great discomfiture, she was able to lay them all before me. Once, when

I called upon her, she read the principal passages aloud with great

feeling and force, and then she asked me how I could have been so

simple-minded as to have thought that so childish a creature as

Tichatschek would be able to find the proper tones for Tannhäuser. I

tried to bring her attention and my own to bear upon the nature of the

music, which was written so clearly in order to bring out the necessary

accent, that, in my opinion, the music actually spoke for him who

interpreted the passage, even if he were only a musical singer and

nothing more. She shook her head, saying that this would be all right

in the case of an oratorio.

She now sang Elizabeth’s prayer from the piano score, and asked me if I

really thought that this music would answer my intentions if sung by a

young and pretty voice without any soul or without that experience of

life which alone could give the real expression to the interpretation.

I sighed and said that, in that case, the youthfulness of the voice and

of its owner must make up for what was lacking: at the same time, I

asked her as a favour to see what she could do towards making my niece,

Johanna, understand her part. All this, however, did not solve the

Tannhäuser problem, for any effort at teaching Tichatschek would only

have resulted in confusion. I was therefore obliged to rely entirely

upon the energy of his voice, and on the singer’s peculiarly sharp

‘speaking’ tone.

Devrient’s anxiety about the principal parts arose partly out of

concern about her own. She did not know what to do with the part of

Venus; she had undertaken it for the sake of the success of the

performance, for although a small part, so much depended upon its being

ideally interpreted! Later on, when the work was given in Paris, I

became convinced that this part had been written in too sketchy a

style, and this induced me to reconstruct it by making extensive

additions, and by supplying all that which I felt it lacked. For the

moment, however, it looked as if no art on the part of the singer could

give to this sketch anything of what it ought to represent. The only

thing that might have helped towards a satisfactory impersonation of

Venus would have been the artist’s confidence in her own great physical

attraction, and in the effect it would help to produce by appealing to

the purely material sympathies of the public. The certainty that these

means were no longer at her disposal paralysed this great singer, who

could hide her age and matronly appearance no longer. She therefore

became self-conscious, and unable to use even the usual means for

gaining an effect. On one occasion, with a little smile of despair, she

expressed herself incapable of playing Venus, for the very simple

reason that she could not appear dressed like the goddess. ‘What on

earth am I to wear as Venus?’ she exclaimed. ‘After all, I cannot be

clad in a belt alone. A nice figure of fun I should look, and you would

laugh on the wrong side of your face!’

On the whole, I still built my hopes upon the general effect of the

music alone, the great promise of which at the rehearsals greatly

encouraged me. Hiller, who had looked through the score and had already

praised it, assured me that the instrumentation could not have been

carried out with greater sobriety. The characteristic and delicate

sonority of the orchestra delighted me, and strengthened me in my

resolve to be extremely sparing in the use of my orchestral material,

in order to attain that abundance of combinations which I needed for my

later works.

At the rehearsal my wife alone missed the trumpets and trombones that

gave such brightness and freshness to Rienzi. Although I laughed at

this, I could not help feeling anxious when she confided to me how

great had been her disappointment when, at the theatre rehearsal, she

noticed the really feeble impression made by the music of the

Sangerkrieg. Speaking from the point of view of the public, who always

want to be amused or stirred in some way or other, she had thus very

rightly called attention to an exceedingly questionable side of the

performance. But I saw at once that the fault lay less with the

conception than with the fact that I had not controlled the production

with sufficient care.

In regard to the conception of this scene I was literally on the horns

of a dilemma, for I had to decide once for all whether this Sangerkrieg

was to be a concert of arias or a competition in dramatic poetry. There

are many people even nowadays, who, in spite of having witnessed a

perfectly successful production of this scene, have not received the

right impression of its purport. Their idea is that it belongs to the

traditional operatic ‘genre,’ which demands that a number of vocal

evolutions shall be juxtaposed or contrasted, and that these different

songs are intended to amuse and interest the audience by means of their

purely musical changes in rhythm and time on the principle of a concert

programme, i.e. by various items of different styles. This was not at

all my idea: my real intention was, if possible, to force the listener,

for the first time in the history of opera, to take an interest in a

poetical idea, by making him follow all its necessary developments. For

it was only by virtue of this interest that he could be made to

understand the catastrophe, which in this instance was not to be

brought about by any outside influence, but must be the outcome simply

of the natural spiritual processes at work. Hence the need of great

moderation and breadth in the conception of the music; first, in order

that according to my principle it might prove helpful rather than the

reverse to the understanding of the poetical lines, and secondly, in

order that the increasing rhythmic character of the melody which marks

the ardent growth of passion may not be interrupted too arbitrarily by

unnecessary changes in modulation and rhythm. Hence, too, the need of a

very sparing use of orchestral instruments for the accompaniment, and

an intentional suppression of all those purely musical effects which

must be utilised, and that gradually, only when the situation becomes

so intense that one almost ceases to think, and can only feel the

tragic nature of the crisis. No one could deny that I had contrived to

produce the proper effect of this principle the moment I played the

Sangerkrieg on the piano. With the view of ensuring all my future

successes, I was now confronted with the exceptional difficulty of

making the opera singers understand how to interpret their parts

precisely in the way I desired. I remembered how, through lack of

experience, I had neglected properly to superintend the production of

the Fliegender Holländer, and as I now fully realised all the

disastrous consequences of this neglect, I began to think of means by

which I could teach the singers my own interpretation. I have already

stated that it was impossible to influence Tichatschek, for if he were

made to do things he could not understand, he only became nervous and

confused. He was conscious of his advantages. He knew that with his

metallic voice he could sing with great musical rhythm and accuracy,

while his delivery was simply perfect. But, to my great astonishment, I

was soon to learn that all this did not by any means suffice; for, to

my horror, at the first performance, that which had strangely escaped

my notice in the rehearsals became suddenly apparent to me. At the

close of the Sangerkrieg, when Tannhäuser (in frantic excitement, and

forgetful of everybody present) has to sing his praise to Venus, and I

saw Tichatschek moving towards Elizabeth and addressing his passionate

outburst to her, I thought of Schroder-Devrient’s warning in very much

the same way as Croesus must have thought when he cried, ‘O Solon!

Solon!’ at the funeral pyre. In spite of the musical excellence of

Tichatschek, the enormous life and melodic charm of the Sangerkrieg

failed entirely.

On the other hand, I succeeded in calling into life an entirely new

element such as probably had never been seen in opera! I had watched

the young baritone Mitterwurzer with great interest in some of his

parts—he was a strangely reticent man, and not at all sociably

inclined, and I had noticed that his delightfully mellow voice

possessed the rare quality of bringing out the inner note of the soul.

To him I entrusted Wolfram, and I had every reason to be satisfied with

his zeal and with the success of his studies. Therefore, if I wished my

intention and method to become known, especially in regard to this

difficult Sangerkrieg, I had to rely on him for the proper execution of

my plans and everything they involved. I began by going through the

opening song of this scene with him; but, after I had done my utmost to

make him understand how I wanted it done, I was surprised to find how

very difficult this particular rendering of the music appeared to him.

He was absolutely incapable of repeating it after me, and with each

renewed effort his singing became so commonplace and so mechanical that

I realised clearly that he had not understood this piece to be anything

more than a phrase in recitative form, which he might render with any

inflections of the voice that happened to be prescribed, or which might

be sung either this way or that, according to fancy, as was usual in

operatic pieces. He, too, was astonished at his own want of capacity,

but was so struck by the novelty and the justice of my views, that he

begged me not to try any more for the present, but to leave him to find

out for himself how best to become familiar with this newly revealed

world. During several rehearsals he only sang in a whisper in order to

get over the difficulty, but at the last rehearsal he acquitted himself

so admirably of his task, and threw himself into it so heartily, that

his work has remained to this day as my most conclusive reason for

believing that, in spite of the unsatisfactory state of the world of

opera to-day, it is possible not only to find, but also properly to

train, the singer whom I should regard as indispensable for a correct

interpretation of my works. It was through the impression made by

Mitterwurzer that I ultimately succeeded in making the public

understand the whole of my work. This man, who had utterly changed

himself in bearing, look, and appearance in order to fit himself to the

role of Wolfram, had, in thus solving the problem, not only become a

thorough artist, but by his interpretation of his part had also proved

himself my saviour at the very moment when my work was threatening to

fail through the unsatisfactory result of the first performance.

By his side the part of Elizabeth made a sweet impression. The youthful

appearance of my niece, her tall and slender form, the decidedly German

cast of her features, as well as the incomparable beauty of her voice,

with its expression of almost childlike innocence, helped her to gain

the hearts of the audience, even though her talent was more theatrical

than dramatic. She soon rose to fame by her impersonation of this part,

and often in later years, when speaking about Tannhäuser performances

in which she had appeared, people used to tell me that its success had

been entirely due to her. Strange to say, in such reports people

referred principally to the charm of her acting at the moment when she

received the guests in the Wartburg Hall; and I used to account for

this by remembering the untiring efforts with which my talented brother

and I had trained her to perform this very part. And yet it was never

possible to make her understand the proper interpretation of the prayer

in the third act, and I felt inclined to say, ‘O Solon! Solon!’ as I

had done in the case of Tichatschek, when after the first performance I

was obliged to make a considerable cut in this solo, a proceeding which

greatly reduced its importance for ever afterwards. I heard later that

Johanna, who for a short period actually had the reputation of being a

great singer, had never succeeded in singing the prayer as it ought to

be sung, whereas a French singer, Mademoiselle Marie Sax, achieved this

in Paris to my entire satisfaction.

In the beginning of October we had so far progressed with our

rehearsals that nothing stood in the way of an immediate production of

Tannhäuser save the scenery, which was not yet complete. A few only of

the scenes ordered from Paris had arrived, and even these had come very

late. The Wartburg Valley was beautifully effective and perfect in

every detail. The inner part of the Venusberg, however, gave me much

anxiety: the painter had not understood me; he had painted clusters of

trees and statues, which reminded one of Versailles, and had placed

them in a wild cave; he had evidently not known how to combine the

weird with the alluring. I had to insist on extensive alterations, and

chiefly on the painting out of the shrubs and statues, all of which

required time. The grotto had to lie half hidden in a rosy cloud,

through which the Wartburg Valley had to loom in the distance; this was

to be done in strict obedience to my own ideas.

The greatest misfortune, however, was to befall me in the shape of the

tardy delivery of the scenery for the Hall of Song. This was due to

great negligence on the part of the Paris artists; and we waited and

waited until every detail of the opera had been studied and studied

again ad nauseam. Daily I went to the railway station and examined all

the packages and boxes that had arrived, but there was no Hall of Song.

At last I allowed myself to be persuaded not to postpone the first

performance any longer, and I decided to use the Hall of Karl the Great

out of Oberon, originally suggested to me by Lüttichau, instead of the

real thing. Considering the importance I attached to practical effect,

this entailed a great sacrifice of my personal feelings. And true

enough, when the curtain rose for the second act, the reappearance of

this throne-room, which the public had seen so often, added

considerably to the general disappointment of the audience, who had

anticipated astonishing surprises in this opera.

On the 19th of October the first performance took place. In the morning

of that day a very beautiful young lady was introduced to me by the

leader Lipinsky. Her name was Mme. Ivalergis, and she was a niece of

the Russian Chancellor, Count von Nesselrode. Liszt had spoken to her

about me with such enthusiasm that she had travelled all the way to

Dresden especially to hear the first production of my new work. I

thought I was right in regarding this flattering visit as a good omen.

But although on this occasion she turned away from me, somewhat

perplexed and disappointed by the very unintelligible performance and

the somewhat doubtful reception with which it met, I had sufficient

cause in after-years to know how deeply this remarkable and energetic

woman had nevertheless been impressed.

A great contrast to this visit was one I received from a peculiar man

called C. Gaillard. He was the editor of a Berlin musical paper, which

had only just started, and in which I had read with great astonishment

an entirely favourable and important criticism of my Fliegender

Holländer. Although necessity had compelled me to remain indifferent to

the attitude of the critics, yet this particular notice gave me much

pleasure, and I had invited my unknown critic to come and hear the

first production of Tannhäuser in Dresden.

This he did, and I was deeply touched to find that I had to deal with a

young man who, in spite of being threatened by consumption, and being

also exceedingly badly off, had come at my invitation, simply from a

sense of duty and honour, and not with any mercenary motive. I saw from

his knowledge and capacities that he would never be able to attain a

position of great influence, but his kindness of heart and his

extraordinarily receptive mind filled me with a feeling of profound

respect for him. A few years later I was very sorry to hear that he had

at last succumbed to the terrible disease from which I knew him to be

suffering; for to the very end he remained faithful and devoted to me,

in spite of the most trying circumstances.

Meanwhile I had renewed my acquaintance with the friend I had won

through the production of the Fliegender Holländer in Berlin, and who

for a long time I had never had an opportunity of knowing more

thoroughly. The second time I met her was at Schroder-Devrient’s, with

whom she was already on friendly terms, and of whom she used to speak

as ‘one of my greatest conquests.’

She was already past her first youth, and had no beauty of feature

except remarkably penetrating and expressive eyes that showed the

greatness of soul with which she was gifted. She was the sister of

Frommann, the bookseller of Jena, and could relate many intimate facts

about Goethe, who had stayed at her brother’s house when he was in that

town. She had held the position of reader and companion to the Princess

Augusta of Prussia, and had thus become intimately acquainted with her,

and was regarded by her own association as almost a bosom friend and

confidante of that great lady. Nevertheless, she lived in extreme

poverty, and seemed proud of being able, by means of her talent as a

painter of arabesques, to secure for herself some sort of independence.

She always remained faithfully devoted to me, as she was one of the few

who were uninfluenced by the unfavourable impression produced by the

first performance of Tannhäuser, and promptly expressed her

appreciation of my latest work with the greatest enthusiasm.

With regard to the production itself the conclusions I drew from it

were as follows: the real faults in the work, which I have already

mentioned incidentally, lay in the sketchy and clumsy portrayal of the

part of Venus, and consequently of the whole of the introductory scene

of the first act. In consequence of this defect the drama never even

rose to the level of genuine warmth, still less did it attain to the

heights of passion which, according to the poetic conception of the

part, should so strongly work upon the feelings of the audience as to

prepare them for the inevitable catastrophe in which the scene

culminates, and thus lead up to the tragic denouement. This great scene

was a complete failure, in spite of the fact that it was entrusted to

so great an actress as Schroder-Devrient, and a singer so unusually

gifted as Tichatschek. The genius of Devrient might yet have struck the

right note of passion in the scene had she not chanced to be acting

with a singer incapable of all dramatic seriousness, and whose natural

gifts only fitted him for joyous or declamatory accents, and who was

totally incapable of expressing pain and suffering. It was not until

Wolfram’s touching song and the closing scene of this act were reached

that the audience showed any signs of emotion. Tichatschek wrought such

a tremendous effect in the concluding phrase by the jubilant music of

his voice that, as I was afterwards informed, the end of this first act

left the audience in a great state of enthusiasm. This was maintained,

and even exceeded in the second act, during which Elizabeth and Wolfram

made a very sympathetic impression. It was only the hero of Tannhäuser

who continued to lose ground, and at last so completely failed to hold

the audience that in the final scene he almost broke down himself in

dejection, as though the failure of Tannhäuser were his own. The fatal

defect of his performance lay in his inability to find the right

expression for the theme of the great Adagio passage of the finale

beginning with the words: ‘To lead the sinner to salvation, the

Heaven-sent messenger drew near.’ The importance of this passage I have

explained at length in my subsequent instructions for the production of

Tannhäuser. Indeed, owing to Tichatschek’s absolutely expressionless

rendering, which made it seem terribly long and tedious, I had to omit

it entirely from the second performance. As I did not wish to offend so

devoted and, in his way, so deserving a man as Tichatschek, I let it be

understood I had come to the conclusion that this theme was a failure.

Moreover, as Tichatschek was thought to be an actor chosen by myself to

take the parts of the heroes in my works, this passage, which was so

immeasurably vital to the opera, continued to be omitted in all the

subsequent productions of Tannhäuser, as though this proceeding had

been approved and demanded by me. I therefore cherished no illusions

about the value of the subsequent universal success of this opera on

the German stage. My hero, who, in rapture as in woe, should always

have asserted his feelings with boundless energy, slunk away at the end

of the second act with the humble bearing of a penitent sinner, only to

reappear in the third with a demeanour designed to awaken the

charitable sympathy of the audience. His pronunciation of the Pope’s

excommunication, however, was rendered with his usual full rhetorical

power, and it was refreshing to hear his voice dominating the

accompanying trombones. Granted that this radical defect in the hero’s

acting had left the public in a doubtful and unsatisfied state of

suspense regarding the meaning of the whole, yet the mistake in the

execution of the final scene, arising from my own inexperience in this

new field of dramatic creation, undoubtedly contributed to produce a

chilling uncertainty as to the true significance of the scenic action.

In my first complete version I had made Venus, on the occasion of her

second attempt to recall her faithless lover, appear in a vision to

Tannhäuser when he is in a frenzy of madness, and the awfulness of the

situation, is merely suggested by a faint roseate glow upon the distant

Horselberg. Even the definite announcement of Elizabeth’s death was a

sudden inspiration on the part of Wolfram. This idea I intended to

convey to the listening audience solely by the sound of bells tolling

in the distance, and by a faint gleam of torches to attract their eyes

to the remote Wartburg. Moreover, there was a lack of precision and

clearness in the appearance of the chorus of young pilgrims, whose duty

it was to announce the miracle by their song alone. At that time I had

given them no budding staves to carry, and had unfortunately spoiled

their refrain by a tedious and unbroken monotony of accompaniment.

When at last the curtain fell, I was under the impression, not so much

from the behaviour of the audience, which was friendly, as from my own

inward conviction, that the failure of this work was to be attributed

to the immature and unsuitable material used in its production. My

depression was extreme, and a few friends who were present after the

piece, among them my dear sister Clara and her husband, were equally

affected. That very evening I decided to remedy the defects of the

first night before the second performance. I was conscious of where the

principal fault lay, but hardly dared give expression to my conviction.

At the slightest attempt on my part to explain anything to Tichatschek

I had to abandon it, as I realised the impossibility of success, I

should only have made him so embarrassed and annoyed, that on one

pretext or another he would never have sung Tannhäuser again. In order

to ensure the repetition of my opera, therefore, I took the only course

open to me by arrogating to myself all blame for the failure. I could

thus make considerable curtailments, whereby, of course, the dramatic

significance of the leading role was considerably lessened; this,

however, did not interfere with the other parts of the opera, which had

been favourably received. Consequently, although inwardly very

humiliated, I hoped to gain some advantage for my work at the second

performance, and was particularly desirous that this should take place

with as little delay as possible. But Tichatschek was hoarse, and I had

to possess my soul in patience for fully a week.

I can hardly describe what I suffered during that time; it seemed as if

this delay would completely ruin my work. Every day that elapsed

between the first and second performance left the result of the former

more and more problematic, until at last it appeared to be a generally

acknowledged failure. While the public as a whole expressed angry

astonishment that, after the approval they had shown of my Rienzi, I

had paid no attention to their taste in writing my new work, there were

may kind and judicious friends who were utterly perplexed at its

inefficiency, the principal parts of which they had been unable to

understand, or thought were imperfectly sketched and finished. The

critics, with unconcealed joy, attacked it as ravens attack carrion

thrown out to them. Even the passions and prejudices of the day were

drawn into the controversy in order, if possible, to confuse men’s

minds, and prejudice them against me. It was just at the time when the

German-Catholic agitation, set in motion by Czersky and Ronge as a

highly meritorious and liberal movement, was causing a great commotion.

It was now made out that by Tannhäuser I had provoked a reactionary

tendency, and that precisely as Meyerbeer with his Huguenots had

glorified Protestantism, so I with my latest opera would glorify

Catholicism.

The rumour that in writing Tannhäuser I had been bribed by the Catholic

part was believed for a long time. While the effort was being made to

ruin my popularity by this means, I had the questionable honour of

being approached, first by letter, afterwards in person, by a certain

M. Rousseau, at that time editor of the Prussian Staatszeitung, who

wished for my friendship and help. I knew of him only in connection

with a scathing criticism of my Fliegender Holländer. He informed me

that he had been sent from Austria to further the Catholic cause in

Berlin, but that he had had so many sad experiences of the

fruitlessness of his efforts, that he was now returning to Vienna to

continue his work in this direction undisturbed, with which work I had,

by my Tannhäuser, proclaimed myself fully in accord.

That remarkable paper, the Dresdener Anzeiger, which was a local organ

for the redress of slander and scandal, daily published some fresh bit

of news to my prejudice. At last I noticed that these attacks were met

by witty and forcible little snubs, and also that encouraging comments

appeared in my favour, which for some time surprised me very much, as I

knew that only enemies and never friends interested themselves in such

cases. But I learned, to my amusement, from Röckel, that he and my

friend Heine had carried out this inspiriting campaign on my behalf.

The ill-feeling against me in this quarter was only troublesome because

at that unfortunate period I was hindered from expressing myself

through my work. Tichatschek continued hoarse, and it was said he would

never sing in my opera again. I heard from Lüttichau that, scared by

the failure of Tannhäuser, he was holding himself in readiness to

countermand the order for the promised scenery for the Hall of Song, or

to cancel it altogether. I was so terrified at the cowardice which was

thus revealed, that I myself began to look upon Tannhäuser as doomed.

My prospects and my whole position, when viewed in this mood, may be

readily gathered from my communications, especially those referring to

my negotiations for the publication of my works.

This terrible week dragged out like an endless eternity. I was afraid

to look anybody in the face, but was one day obliged to go to Meser’s

music shop, where I met Gottfried Semper just buying a text-book of

Tannhäuser. Only a short time before I had been very much put out in

discussing this subject with him; he would listen to nothing I had to

say about the Minnesangers and Pilgrims of the Middle Ages in

connection with art, but gave me to understand that he despised me for

my choice of such material.

While Meser assured me that no inquiry whatever had been received for

the numbers of Tannhäuser already published, it was strange that my

most energetic antagonist should be the only person who had actually

bought and paid for a copy. In a peculiarly earnest and impressive

manner he remarked to me that it was necessary to be thoroughly

acquainted with the subject if a just opinion was to be passed on it,

and that for this purpose, unfortunately, nothing but the text was

available. This very meeting with Semper, strange as it may appear, was

the first really encouraging sign that I can remember.

But I found my greatest consolation in those days of trouble and

anxiety in Röckel, who from that time forward entered into a lifelong

intimacy with me. He had, without my being aware of it, disputed,

explained, quarrelled, and petitioned on my behalf, and thereby roused

himself to a veritable enthusiasm for Tannhäuser. The evening before

the second performance, which was at last to take place, we met over a

glass of beer, and his bright demeanour had such a cheering effect upon

me that we became very lively. After contemplating my head for some

time, he swore that it was impossible to destroy me, that there was a

something in me, something, probably, in my blood, as similar

characteristics also appeared in my brother Albert, who was otherwise

so unlike me. To speak more plainly, he called it the peculiar HEAT of

my temperament; this heat, he thought, might consume others, whereas I

appeared to feel at my best when it glowed most fiercely, for he had

several times seen me positively ablaze. I laughed, and did not know

what to make of his nonsense. Well, he said, I should soon see what he

meant in Tannhäuser, for it was simply absurd to think the work would

not live; and he was absolutely certain of its success. I thought over

the matter on my way home, and came to the conclusion that if

Tannhäuser did indeed win its way, and become really popular,

incalculable possibilities might be attained.

At last the time arrived for our second performance. For this I thought

I had made due preparation by lessening the importance of the principal

part, and lowering my original ideals about some of the more important

portions, and I hoped by accentuating certain undoubtedly attractive

passages to secure a genuine appreciation of the whole. I was greatly

delighted with the scenery which had at last arrived for the Hall of

Song in the second act, the beautiful and imposing effect of which

cheered us all, for we looked upon it as a good omen. Unfortunately I

had to bear the humiliation of seeing the theatre nearly empty. This,

more than anything else, sufficed to convince me what the opinion of

the public really was in regard to my work. But, if the audience was

scanty, the majority, at any rate, consisted of the first friends of my

art, and the reception of the piece was very cordial. Mitterwurzer

especially aroused the greatest enthusiasm. As for Tichatschek, my

anxious friends, Röckel and Heine, thought it necessary to endeavour by

every artifice to keep him in a good humour for his part. In order to

give practical assistance in making the undoubted obscurity of the last

scene clear, my friends had asked several young people, more especially

artists, to give vent to torrents of applause at those parts which are

not generally regarded by the opera-going public as provoking any

demonstration. Strange to say, the outburst of applause thus provoked

after the words, ‘An angel flies to God’s throne for thee, and will

make his voice heard; Heinrich, thou art saved,’ made the entire

situation suddenly clear to the public. At all subsequent productions

this continued to be the principal moment for the expression of

sympathy on the part of the audience, although it had passed quite

unnoticed on the first night. A few days later a third performance took

place, but this time before a full house, Schroder-Devrient, depressed

at the small share she was able to take in the success of my work,

watched the progress of the opera from the small stage box; she

informed me that Lüttichau had come to her with a beaming face, saying

he thought we had now carried Tannhäuser happily through.

And this certainly proved to be the case; we often repeated it in the

course of the winter, but noticed that when two performances followed

close upon one another, there was not such a rush for the second, from

which we concluded that I had not yet gained the approval of the great

opera-going public, but only of the more cultured section of the

community. Among these real friends of Tannhäuser there were many, as I

gradually discovered, who as a rule never visited the theatre at all,

and least of all the opera. This interest on the part of a totally new

public continued to grow in intensity, and expressed itself in a

delightful and hitherto unknown manner by a strong sympathy for the

author. It was particularly painful to me, on Tichatschek’s account, to

respond alone to the calls of the audience after almost every act;

however, I had at last to submit, as my refusal would only have exposed

the vocalist to fresh humiliations, for when he appeared on the stage

with his colleagues without me, the loud shouts for me were almost

insulting to him. With what genuine eagerness did I wish that the

contrary were the case, and that the excellence of the execution might

overshadow the author. The conviction that I should never attain this

with my Tannhäuser in Dresden guided me in all my future undertakings.

But, at all events, in producing Tannhäuser in this city I had

succeeded in making at least the cultured public acquainted with my

peculiar tendencies, by stimulating their mental faculties and

stripping the performance of all realistic accessories. I did not,

however, succeed in making these tendencies sufficiently clear in a

dramatic performance, and in such an irresistible and convincing manner

as also to familiarise the uncultivated taste of the ordinary public

with them when they saw them embodied on the stage.

By enlarging the circle of my acquaintances, and making interesting

friends, I had a good opportunity during the winter of obtaining

further information on this point in a way that was both instructive

and encouraging. My acquaintance and close intimacy at this time with

Dr. Hermann Franck of Breslau, who had for some time been living

quietly in Dresden, was also very inspiring. He was very comfortably

off, and was one of those men who, by a wide knowledge and good

judgment, combined with considerable gifts as an author, won an

excellent reputation for himself in a large and select circle of

private friends, without, however, making any great name for himself

with the public. He endeavoured to use his knowledge and abilities for

the general good, and was induced by Brockhaus to edit the Deutsche

Allgemeine Zeitung when it first started. This paper had been founded

by Brockhaus some years earlier. However, after editing it for a year,

Franck resigned this post, and from that time forward it was only on

the very rarest occasions that he could be persuaded to touch anything

connected with journalism. His curt and spirited remarks about his

experiences in connection with the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung

justified his disinclination to engage in any work connected with the

public press. My appreciation was all the greater, therefore, when,

without any persuasion on my part, he wrote a full report on Tannhäuser

for the Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung. This appeared in October or

November, 1845, in a supplement to that paper, and although it

contained the first account of a work which has since been so widely

discussed, I regard it, after mature consideration, as the most

far-reaching and exhaustive that has ever been written. By this means

my name figured for the first time in the great European political

paper, whose columns, in consequence of a remarkable change of front

which was to the interests of the proprietors, have since been open to

any one who wished to make merry at the expense of me or my work.

The point which particularly attracted me in Dr. Franck was the

delicate and tactful art he displayed in his criticism and his methods

of discussion. There was something distinguished about them that was

not so much the outcome of rank and social position as of genuine

world-wide culture.

The delicate coldness and reserve of his manner charmed rather than

repelled me, as it was a characteristic I had not met with hitherto.

When I found him expressing himself with some reserve in regard to

persons who enjoyed a reputation to which I did not think they were

always entitled, I was very pleased to see during my intercourse with

him that in many ways I exercised a decisive influence over his

opinion. Even at that time I did not care to let it pass unchallenged

when people evaded the close analysis of the work of this or that

celebrity, by referring in terms of eulogy to his ‘good-nature.’ I even

cornered my worldly wise friend on this point, when a few years later I

had the satisfaction of getting from him a very concise explanation of

Meyerbeer’s ‘good-nature,’ of which he had once spoken, and he recalled

with a smile the extraordinary questions I had put to him at the time.

He was, however, quite alarmed when I gave him a very lucid explanation

of the disinterestedness and conspicuous altruism of Mendelssohn in the

service of art, of which he had spoken enthusiastically. In a

conversation about Mendelssohn he had remarked how delightful it was to

find a man able to make real sacrifices in order to free himself from a

false position that was of no service to art. It was assuredly a grand

thing, he said, to have renounced a good salary of nine thousand marks

as general musical conductor in Berlin, and to have retired to Leipzig

as a simple conductor at the Gewandhaus concerts, and Mendelssohn was

much to be admired on that account. Just at that time I happened to be

in a position to give some correct details regarding this apparent

sacrifice on the part of Mendelssohn, because when I had made a serious

proposal to our general management about increasing the salaries of

several of the poorer members of the orchestra, Lüttichau was requested

to inform me that, according to the King’s latest commands, the

expenditure on the state bands was to be so restricted that for the

present the poorer chamber musicians could not claim any consideration,

for Herr von Falkenstein, the governor of the Leipzig district, who was

a passionate admirer of Mendelssohn’s, had gone so far as to influence

the King to appoint the latter secret conductor, with a secret salary

of six thousand marks. This sum, together with the salary of three

thousand marks openly granted him by the management of the Leipzig

Gewandhaus, would amply compensate him for the position he had

renounced in Berlin, and he had consequently consented to migrate to

Leipzig. This large grant had, for decency’s sake, to be kept secret by

the board administering the band funds, not only because it was

detrimental to the interests of the institution, but also because it

might give offence to those who were acting as conductors at a lower

salary, if they knew another man had been appointed to a sinecure. From

these circumstances Mendelssohn derived not only the advantage of

having the grant kept a secret, but also the satisfaction of allowing

his friends to applaud him as a model of self-sacrificing zeal for

going to Leipzig; which they could easily do, although they knew him to

be in a good financial position. When I explained this to Franck, he

was astonished, and admitted it was one of the strangest cases he had

ever come across in connection with undeserved fame.

We soon arrived at a mutual understanding in our views about many other

artistic celebrities with whom we came in contact at that time in

Dresden. This was a simple matter in the case of Ferdinand Hiller, who

was regarded as the chief of the ‘good-natured’ ones. Regarding the

more famous painters of the so-called Dusseldorf School, whom I met

frequently through the medium of Tannhäuser, it was not quite so easy

to come to a conclusion, as I was to a great extent influenced by the

fame attached to their well-known names; but here again Franck startled

me with opportune and conclusive reasons for disappointment. When it

was a question between Bendemann and Hubner, it seemed to me that

Hubner might very well be sacrificed to Bendemann. The latter, who had

only just completed the frescoes for one of the reception-rooms at the

royal palace, and had been rewarded by his friends with a banquet,

appeared to me to have the right to be honoured as a great master. I

was very much astonished, therefore, when Franck calmly pitied the King

of Saxony for having had his room ‘bedaubed’ by Bendemann!

Nevertheless, there was no denying that these people were

‘good-natured.’ My intercourse with them became more frequent, and at

all events offered me opportunities of mixing with the more cultured

artistic society, in distinction to the theatrical circles with which I

had usually associated; yet I never derived from it the least

enthusiasm or inspiration. The latter, however, appears to have been

Hiller’s main object, and that winter he organised a sort of social

circle which held weekly meetings at the home of one or the other of

its members in turn. Reinecke, who was both painter and poet, joined

this society, together with Hubner and Bendemann, and had the bad

fortune to write the new text for an opera for Hiller, the fate of

which I will describe later on. Robert Schumann, the musician, who was

also in Dresden at this time, and was busy working out on opera, which

eventually developed into Genovefa, made advances to Hiller and myself.

I had already known Schumann in Leipzig, and we had both entered upon

our musical careers at about the same time. I had also occasionally

sent small contributions to the Neue Zeitschrift fur Musik, of which he

had formerly been editor, and more recently a longer one from Paris on

Rossini’s Stabat Mater. He had been asked to conduct his Paradies und

Peri at a concert to be given at the theatre; but his peculiar

awkwardness in conducting on that occasion aroused my sympathy for the

conscientious and energetic musician whose work made so strong an

appeal to me, and a kindly and friendly confidence soon grew up between

us. After a performance of Tannhäuser, at which he was present, he

called on me one morning and declared himself fully and decidedly in

favour of my work. The only objection he had to make was that the

stretta of the second finale was too abrupt, a criticism which proved

his keenness of perception; and I was able to show him, by the score,

how I had been compelled, much against my inclination, to curtail the

opera, and thereby create the position to which he had taken exception.

We often met when out walking and, as far as it was possible with a

person so sparing of words, we exchanged views on matters of musical

interest. He was looking forward to the production, under my baton, of

Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, as he had attended the performances at

Leipzig, and had been very much disappointed by Mendelssohn’s

conducting, which had quite misunderstood the time of the first

movement. Otherwise his society did not inspire me particularly, and

the fact that he was too conservative to benefit by my views was soon

shown, more especially in his conception of the poem of Genovefa. It

was clear that my example had only made a very transient impression on

him, only just enough, in fact, to make him think it advisable to write

the text of an opera himself. He afterwards invited me to hear him read

his libretto, which was a combination of the styles of Hebbel and

Tieck. When, however, out of a genuine desire for the success of his

work, about which I had serious misgivings, I called his attention to

some grave defects in it, and suggested the necessary alterations, I

realised how matters stood with this extraordinary person: he simply

wanted me to be swayed by himself, but deeply resented any interference

with the product of his own ideals, so that thenceforward I let matters

alone.

In the following winter, our circle, thanks to the assiduity of Hiller,

was considerably widened, and it now became a sort of club whose object

was to meet freely every week in a room at Engel’s restaurant at the

Postplatz. Just about this time the famous J. Schnorr of Munich was

appointed director of the museums in Dresden, and we entertained him at

a banquet. I had already seen some of his large and well-executed

cartoons, which made a deep impression on me, not only on account of

their dimensions, but also by reason of the events they depicted from

old German history, in which I was at that time particularly

interested. It was through Schnorr that I now became acquainted with

the ‘Munich School’ of which he was the master. My heart overflowed

when I thought what it meant for Dresden, if such giants of German art

were to shake hands there. I was much struck by Schnorr’s appearance

and conversation, and I could not reconcile his whining pedagogic

manner with his mighty cartoons; however, I thought it a great stroke

of luck when he also took to frequenting Engel’s restaurant on

Saturdays. He was well versed in the old German legends, and I was

delighted when they formed the topic of conversation. The famous

sculptor, Hänel, used also to attend these meetings, and his marvellous

talent inspired me with the greatest respect, although I was not an

authority on his work, and could only judge of it by my own feelings. I

soon saw that his bearing and manner were affected; he was very fond of

expressing his opinion and judgment on questions of art, and I was not

in a position to decide whether they were reliable or otherwise. In

fact, it often occurred to me that I was listening to a Philistine

swaggerer. It was only when my old friend Pecht, who had also settled

in Dresden for a time, clearly and emphatically explained to me Hänel’s

standing as an artist, that I conquered all my secret doubts, and tried

to find some pleasure in his works. Rietschel, who was also a member of

our society, was the very antithesis of Hänel. I often found it

difficult to believe that the pale delicate man, with the whining

nervous way of expressing himself, was really a sculptor; but as

similar peculiarities in Schnorr did not prevent me from recognising

him as a marvellous painter, this helped me to make friends with

Rietschel, as he was quite free from affectation, and had a warm

sympathetic soul that drew me ever closer to him. I also remember

hearing from him a very enthusiastic appreciation of my personality as

a conductor. In spite, however, of being fellow-members of our

versatile art club, we never attained a footing of real comradeship,

for, after all, no one thought much of anybody else’s talents. For

instance, Hiller had arranged some orchestral concerts, and to

commemorate them he was entertained at the usual banquet by his

friends, when his services were gratefully acknowledged with due

rhetorical pathos. Yet I never found, in my private intercourse with

Hiller’s friends, the least enthusiasm in regard to his work; on the

contrary, I only noticed expressions of doubt and apprehensive shrugs.

These feted concerts soon came to an end. At our social evenings we

never discussed the works of the masters who were present; they were

not even mentioned, and it was soon evident that none of the members

knew what to talk about. Semper was the only man who, in his

extraordinary fashion, often so enlivened our entertainments that

Rietschel, inwardly sympathetic, though painfully startled, would

heartily complain against the unrestrained outbursts that led not

infrequently to hot discussions between Semper and myself. Strange to

say, we two always seemed to start from the hypothesis that we were

antagonists, for he insisted upon regarding me as the representative of

mediaeval Catholicism, which he often attacked with real fury. I

eventually succeeded in persuading him that my studies and inclinations

had always led me to German antiquity, and to the discovery of ideals

in the early Teutonic myths. When we came to paganism, and I expressed

my enthusiasm for the genuine heathen legends, he became quite a

different being, and a deep and growing interest now began to unite us

in such a way that it quite isolated us from the rest of the company.

It was, however, impossible ever to settle anything without a heated

argument, not only because Semper had a peculiar habit of contradicting

everything flatly, but also because he knew his views were opposed to

those of the entire company. His paradoxical assertions, which were

apparently only intended to stir up strife, soon made me realise,

beyond any doubt, that he was the only one present who was passionately

in earnest about everything he said, whereas all the others were quite

content to let the matter drop when convenient. A man of the latter

type was Gutzkow, who was often with us; he had been summoned to

Dresden by the general management of our court theatre, to act in the

capacity of dramatist and adapter of plays. Several of his pieces had

recently met with great success: Zopf und Schwert, Das Urbild des

Tartuffe, and Uriel Acosta, shed an unexpected lustre on the latest

dramatic repertoire, and it seemed as though the advent of Gutzkow

would inaugurate a new era of glory for the Dresden theatre, where my

operas had also been first produced. The good intentions of the

management were certainly undeniable. My only regret on that occasion

was that the hopes my old friend Laube entertained of being summoned to

Dresden to fill that post were unrealised. He also had thrown himself

enthusiastically into the work of dramatic literature. Even in Paris I

had noticed the eagerness with which he used to study the technique of

dramatic composition, especially that of Scribe, in the hope of

acquiring the skill of that writer, without which, as he soon

discovered, no poetical drama in German could be successful. He

maintained that he had thoroughly mastered this style in his comedy,

Rococo, and he cherished the conviction that he could work up any

imaginable material into an effective stage play.

At the same time, he was very careful to show equal skill in the

selection of his material. In my opinion this theory of his was a

complete failure, as his only successful pieces were those in which

popular interest was excited by catch-phrases. This interest was always

more or less associated with the politics of the day, and generally

involved some obvious diatribes about ‘German unity’ and ‘German

Liberalism.’ As this important stimulus was first applied by way of

experiment to the subscribers to our Residenz Theater, and afterwards

to the German public generally, it had, as I have already said, to be

worked out with the consummate skill which, presumably, could only be

learned from modern French writers of comic opera.

I was very glad to see the result of this study in Laube’s plays, more

especially as when he visited us in Dresden, which he often did on the

occasion of a new production, he admitted his indebtedness with modest

candour, and was far from pretending to be a real poet. Moreover, he

displayed great skill and an almost fiery zeal, not only in the

preparation of his pieces, but also in their production, so that the

offer of a post at Dresden, the hope of which had been held out to him,

would at least, from a practical point of view, have been a benefit to

the theatre. Finally, however, the choice fell on his rival Gutzkow, in

spite of his obvious unsuitability for the practical work of dramatist.

It was evident that even as regards his successful plays his triumph

was mainly due to his literary skill, because these effective plays

were immediately followed by wearisome productions which made us

realise, to our astonishment, that he himself could not have been aware

of the skill he had previously displayed. It was, however, precisely

these abstract qualities of the genuine man of letters which, in the

eyes of many, cast over him the halo of literary greatness; and when

Lüttichau, thinking more of a showy reputation than of permanent

benefit to his theatre, decided to give the preference to Gutzkow, he

thought his choice would give a special impetus to the cause of higher

culture. To me the appointment of Gutzkow as the director of dramatic

art at the theatre was peculiarly objectionable, as it was not long

before I was convinced of his utter incompetence for the task, and it

was probably owing to the frankness with which I expressed my opinion

to Lüttichau that our subsequent estrangement was originally due. I had

to complain bitterly of the want of judgment and the levity of those

who so recklessly selected men to fill the posts of managers and

conductors in such precious institutions of art as the German royal

theatres. To obviate the failure I felt convinced must follow on this

important appointment, I made a special request that Gutzkow should not

be allowed to interfere in the management of the opera; he readily

yielded, and thus spared himself great humiliation. This action,

however, created a feeling of mistrust between us, though I was quite

ready to remove this as far as possible by coming into personal contact

with him whenever opportunity offered on those evenings when the

artists used to gather at the club, as already described. I would

gladly have made this strange man, whose head was anxiously bowed down

on his breast, relax and unburden himself in his conversations with me,

but I was unsuccessful, on account of his constant reserve and

suspicion, and his studied aloofness. An opportunity arose for a

discussion between us when he wanted the orchestra to take a

melodramatic part (which they afterwards did) in a certain scene of his

Uriel Acosta, where the hero had to recant his alleged heresy. The

orchestra had to execute the soft tremolo for a given time on certain

chords, but when I heard the performance it appeared to me absurd, and

equally derogatory both for the music and the drama.

On one of these evenings I tried to come to an understanding with

Gutzkow concerning this, and the employment of music generally as a

melodramatic auxiliary to the drama, and I discussed my views on the

subject in accordance with the highest principles I had conceived. He

met all the chief points of my discussion with a nervous distrustful

silence, but finally explained that I really went too far in the

significance which I claimed for music, and that he failed to

understand how music would be degraded if it were applied more

sparingly to the drama, seeing that the claims of verse were often

treated with much less respect when it was used as a mere accessory to

operatic music. To put it practically, in fact, it would be advisable

for the librettist not to be too dainty in this matter; it wasn’t

possible always to give the actor a brilliant exit; at the same time,

however, nothing could be more painful than when the chief performer

made his exit without any applause. In such cases a little distracting

noise in the orchestra really supplied a happy diversion. This I

actually heard Gutzkow say; moreover, I saw that he really meant it!

After this I felt I had done with him.

It was not long before I had equally little to do with all the

painters, musicians, and other zealots in art belonging to our society.

At the same time, however, I came into closer contact with Berthold

Auerbach. With great enthusiasm, Alwine Frommann had already drawn my

attention to Auerbach’s Pastoral Stories. The account she gave of these

modest works (for that is how she characterised them) sounded quite

attractive. She said that they had had the same refreshing effect on

her circle of friends in Berlin as that produced by opening the window

of a scented boudoir (to which she compared the literature they had

hitherto been used to), and letting in the fresh air of the woods.

After that I read the Pastoral Stories of the Black Forest, which had

so quickly become famous, and I, too, was strongly attracted by the

contents and tone of these realistic anecdotes about the life of the

people in a locality which it was easy enough to identify from the

vivid descriptions. As at this time Dresden seemed to be becoming ever

more and more the rendezvous for the lights of our literary and

artistic world, Auerbach also reconciled himself to taking up his

quarters in this city; and for quite a long time, lived with his friend

Hiller, who thus again had a celebrity at his side of equal standing

with himself. The short, sturdy Jewish peasant boy, as he was placed to

represent himself to be, made a very agreeable impression. It was only

later that I understood the significance of his green jacket, and above

all of his green hunting-cap, which made him look exactly what the

author of Swabian Pastoral Stories ought to look like, and this

significance was anything but a naive one. The Swiss poet, Gottfried

Keller, once told me that, when Auerbach was in Zürich, and he had

decided on taking him up, he (Auerbach) had drawn his attention to the

best way in which to introduce one’s literary effusions to the public,

and to make money, and he advised him, above all things, to get a coat

and cap like his own, for being, as he said, like himself, neither

handsome nor well grown, it would be far better deliberately to make

himself look rough and queer; so saying, he placed his cap on his head

in such a way as to look a little rakish. For the time being, I

perceived no real affectation in Auerbach; he had assimilated so much

of the tone and ways of the people, and had done this so happily, that,

in any case, one could not help asking oneself why, with these

delightful qualities, he should move with such tremendous ease in

spheres that seemed absolutely antagonistic. At all events, he always

seemed in his true element even in those circles which really seemed

most opposed to his assumed character; there he stood in his green

coat, keen, sensitive, and natural, surrounded by the distinguished

society that flattered him; and he loved to show letters he had

received from the Grand Duke of Weimar and his answers to them, all the

time looking at things from the standpoint of the Swabian peasant

nature which suited him so admirably.

What especially attracted me to him was the fact that he was the first

Jew I ever met with whom one could discuss Judaism with absolute

freedom. He even seemed particularly desirous of removing, in his

agreeable manner, all prejudice on this score; and it was really

touching to hear him speak of his boyhood, and declare that he was

perhaps the only German who had read Klopstock’s Messiah all through.

Having one day become absorbed in this work, which he read secretly in

his cottage home, he had played the truant from school, and when he

finally arrived too late at the school-house, his teacher angrily

exclaimed: ‘You confounded Jew-boy, where have you been? Lending money

again?’ Such experiences had only made him feel pensive and melancholy,

but not bitter, and he had even been inspired with real compassion for

the coarseness of his tormentors. These were traits in his character

which drew me very strongly to him. As time went on, however, it seemed

to me a serious matter that he could not get away from the atmosphere

of these ideas, for I began to feel that the universe contained no

other problem for him than the elucidation of the Jewish question. One

day, therefore, I protested as good-naturedly and confidentially as I

could, and advised him to let the whole problem of Judaism drop, as

there were, after all, many other standpoints from which the world

might be criticised. Strange to say, he thereupon not only lost his

ingeniousness, but also fell to whining in an ecstatic fashion, which

did not seem to me very genuine, and assured me that that would be an

impossibility for him, as there was still so much in Judaism which

needed his whole sympathy. I could not help recalling the surprising

anguish which he had manifested on this occasion, when I learned, in

the course of time, that he had repeatedly arranged Jewish marriages,

concerning the happy result of which I heard nothing, save that he had,

by this means, made quite a fortune. When, several years afterwards, I

again saw him in Zürich, I observed that his appearance had

unfortunately changed in a manner quite disconcerting: he looked really

extraordinarily common and dirty; his former refreshing liveliness had

turned into the usual Jewish restlessness, and it was easy to see that

all he said was uttered as if he regretted that his words could not be

turned to better account in a newspaper article.

During his time in Dresden, however, Auerbach’s warm agreement with my

artistic projects really did me good, even though it may have been only

from his Semitic and Swabian standpoint; so did the novelty of the

experience I was at that time undergoing as an artist, in meeting with

ever-increasing regard and recognition among people of note, of

acknowledged importance and of exceptional culture. If, after the

success obtained by Rienzi, I still remained with the circle of the

real theatrical world, the greater success following on Tannhäuser

certainly brought me into contact with such people as I have mentioned

above, who, though to be sure they considerably enlarged my ideas, at

the same time impressed me very unfavourably with what was apparently

the pinnacle of the artistic life of the period. At any rate, I felt

neither rewarded nor, fortunately, even diverted by the acquaintances I

won by the first performance of my Tannhäuser that winter. On the

contrary, I felt an irresistible desire to withdraw into my shell and

leave these gay surroundings into which, strangely enough, I had been

introduced at the instigation of Hiller, whom I soon recognised as

being a nonentity. I felt I must quickly compose something, as this was

the only means of ridding myself of all the disturbing and painful

excitement Tannhäuser had produced in me.

Only a few weeks after the first performances I had worked out the

whole of the Lohengrin text. In November I had already read this poem

to my intimate friends, and soon afterwards to the Hiller set. It was

praised, and pronounced ‘effective.’ Schumann also thoroughly approved

of it, although he did not understand the musical form in which I

wished to carry it out, as he saw no resemblance in it to the old

methods of writing individual solos for the various artists. I then had

some fun in reading different parts of my work to him in the form of

arias and cavatinas, after which he laughingly declared himself

satisfied.

Serious reflection, however, aroused my gravest doubts as to the tragic

character of the material itself, and to these doubts I had been led,

in a manner both sensible and tactful, by Franck. He thought it

offensive to effect Elsa’s punishment through Lohengrin’s departure;

for although he understood that the characteristics of the legend were

expressed precisely by this highly poetical feature, he was doubtful as

to whether it did full justice to the demands of tragic feeling in its

relation to dramatic realism. He would have preferred to see Lohengrin

die before our eyes owing to Elsa’s loving treachery. As, however, this

did not seem feasible, he would have liked to see Lohengrin spell-bound

by some powerful motive, and prevented from getting away. Although, of

course, I would not agree to any of these suggestions, I went so far as

to consider whether I could not do away with the cruel separation, and

still retain the incident of Lohengrin’s departure, which was

essential. I then sought for a means of letting Elsa go away with

Lohengrin, as a form of penance which would withdraw her also from the

world. This seemed more promising to my talented friend. While I was

still very doubtful about all this, I gave my poem to Frau von

Lüttichau, so that she might peruse it, and criticise the point raised

by Franck. In a little letter, in which she expressed her pleasure at

my poem, she wrote briefly, but very decidedly, on the knotty question,

and declared that Franck must be devoid of all poetry if he did not

understand that it was exactly in the way I had chosen, and in no

other, that Lohengrin must depart. I felt as if a load had fallen from

my heart. In triumph I showed the letter to Franck, who, much abashed,

and by way of excusing himself, opened a correspondence with Frau von

Lüttichau, which certainly cannot have been lacking in interest, though

I was never able to see any of it. In any case, the upshot of it was

that Lohengrin remained as I had originally conceived it. Curiously

enough, some time later, I had a similar experience with regard to the

same subject, which again put me in a temporary state of uncertainty.

When Adolf Stahr gravely raised the same objection to the solution of

the Lohengrin question, I was really taken aback by the uniformity of

opinion; and as, owing to some excitement, I was just then no longer in

the same mood as when I composed Lohengrin, I was foolish enough to

write a hurried letter to Stahr in which, with but a few slight

reservations, I declared him to be right. I did not know that, by this,

I was causing real grief to Liszt, who was now in the same position

with regard to Stahr as Frau von Lüttichau had been with regard to

Franck. Fortunately, however, the displeasure of my great friend at my

supposed treachery to myself did not last long; for, without having got

wind of the trouble I had caused him, and thanks to the torture I

myself was going through, I came to the proper decision in a few days,

and, as clear as daylight, I saw what madness it had been. I was

therefore able to rejoice Liszt with the following laconical protest

which I sent him from my Swiss resort: ‘Stahr is wrong, and Lohengrin

is right.’

For the present I remained occupied with the revision of my poem, for

there could be no question of planning the music to it just now. That

peaceful and harmonious state of mind which is so favourable to

creative work, and always so necessary to me for composing, I now had

to secure with the greatest difficulty, for it was one of the things I

always had the hardest struggle to obtain. All the experiences

connected with the performance of Tannhäuser having filled me with true

despair as to the whole future of my artistic operations, I saw it was

hopeless to think of its production being extended to other German

theatres—for I had not been able to achieve this end even with the

successful Rienzi. It was perfectly obvious, therefore, that my work

would, at the utmost, be conceded a permanent place in the Dresden

repertoire. As the result of all this, my pecuniary affairs, which have

already been described, had got into such a serious state that a

catastrophe seemed inevitable. While I was preparing to meet this in

the best way I could, I tried to stupefy myself, on the one hand, by

plunging into the study of history, mythology, and literature, which

were becoming ever dearer and dearer to me, and on the other by working

incessantly at my artistic enterprises. As regards the former, I was

chiefly interested in the German Middle Ages, and tried to make myself

familiar with every point relative to this period. Although I could not

set about this task with philological precision, I proceeded with such

earnestness that I studied the German records, published by Grimm, for

instance, with the greatest interest. As I could not put the results of

such studies immediately into my scenes, there were many who could not

understand why, as an operatic composer, I should waste my time on such

barren work. Different people remarked later on, that the personality

of Lohengrin had a charm quite its own; but this was ascribed to the

happy selection of the subject, and I was specially praised for

choosing it. Material from the German Middle Ages, and later on,

subjects from Scandinavian antiquity, were therefore looked forward to

by many, and, in the end, they were astonished that I gave them no

adequate result of all my labours. Perhaps it will be of help to them

if I now tell them to take the old records and such works to their aid.

I forgot at that time to call Hiller’s attention to my documents, and

with great pride he seized upon a subject out of the history of the

Hohenstaufen. As, however, he had no success with his work, he may

perhaps think I was a little artful for not having spoken to him of the

old records.

Concerning my other duties, my chief undertaking for this winter

consisted in an exceptionally carefully prepared performance of

Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, which took place in the spring on Palm

Sunday. This performance involved many a struggle, besides a host of

experiences which were destined to exercise a strong influence over my

further development. Roughly they were as follows: the royal orchestra

had only one opportunity a year of showing their powers independently

in a musical performance outside the Opera or the church. For the

benefit of the Pension Fund for their widows and orphans, the old

so-called Opera House was given up to a big performance originally only

intended for oratorios. Ultimately, in order to make it more

attractive, a symphony was always added to the oratorio; and, as

already mentioned, I had performed on such occasions, once the Pastoral

Symphony, and later Haydn’s Creation. The latter was a great joy to me,

and it was on this occasion that I first made its acquaintance. As we

two conductors had stipulated for alternate performances, the Symphony

on Palm Sunday of the year 1846 fell to my lot. I had a great longing

for the Ninth Symphony, and I was led to the choice of this work by the

fact that it was almost unknown in Dresden. When the directors of the

orchestra, who were the trustees of the Pension Fund, and who had to

promote its increase, got to know of this, such a fright seized them

that they interviewed the general director, Lüttichau, and begged him,

by virtue of his high authority, to dissuade me from carrying out my

intention. They gave as a reason for this request, that the Pension

Fund would surely suffer through the choice of this symphony, as the

work was in ill-repute in the place, and would certainly keep people

from going to the concert. The symphony had been performed many years

before by Reissiger at a charity concert, and, as the conductor himself

honestly admitted, had been an absolute failure. Now it needed my whole

ardour, and all the eloquence I could command, to prevail over the

doubts of our principal. With the orchestral directors, however, there

was nothing for me to do but quarrel, as I heard that they were

complaining all over the town about my indiscretion. In order to add

shame to their trouble, I made up my mind to prepare the public in such

a way for the performance, upon which I had resolved, and for the work

itself, that at least the sensation caused would lead to a full hall

and thus, in a very favourable manner, guarantee satisfactory returns,

and contradict their belief that the fund was menaced. Thus the Ninth

Symphony had, in every conceivable way, become for me a point of

honour, for the success of which I had to exercise all my powers to the

utmost. The committee had misgivings regarding the outlay needed for

procuring the orchestral parts, so I borrowed them from the Leipzig

Concert Society.

Imagine my feelings, however, on now seeing for the first time since my

earliest boyhood the mysterious pages of this score, which I studied

conscientiously! In those days the sight of these same pages had filled

me with the most mystic reveries, and I had stayed up for nights

together to copy them out. Just as at the time of my uncertainty in

Paris, on hearing the rehearsal of the first three movements performed

by the incomparable orchestra of the Conservatoire, I had been carried

back through years of error and doubt to be placed in marvellous touch

with my earliest days, while all my inmost aspirations had been

fruitfully stimulated in a new direction, so now in the same way the

memory of that music was secretly awakened in me as I again saw before

my own eyes that which in those early days had likewise been only a

mysterious vision. I had by this time experienced much which, in the

depths of my soul, drove me almost unconsciously to a process of

summing-up, to an almost despairing inquiry concerning my fate. What I

dared not acknowledge to myself was the fact of the absolute insecurity

of my existence both from the artistic and financial point of view; for

I saw that I was a stranger to my own mode of life as well as to my

profession, and I had no prospects whatsoever. This despair, which I

tried to conceal from my friends, was now converted into genuine

exaltation, thanks entirely to the Ninth Symphony. It is not likely

that the heart of a disciple has ever been filled with such keen

rapture over the work of a master, as mine was at the first movement of

this symphony. If any one had come upon me unexpectedly while I had the

open score before me, and had seen me convulsed with sobs and tears as

I went through the work in order to consider the best manner of

rendering it, he would certainly have asked with astonishment if this

were really fitting behaviour for the Conductor Royal of Saxony!

Fortunately, on such occasions I was spared the visits of our orchestra

directors, and their worthy conductor Reissiger, and even those of F.

Hiller, who was so versed in classical music.

In the first place I drew up a programme, for which the book of words

for the chorus—always ordered according to custom—furnished me with a

good pretext. I did this in order to provide a guide to the simple

understanding of the work, and thereby hoped to appeal not to the

critical judgment, but solely to the feelings, of the audience. This

programme, in the framing of which some of the chief passages in

Goethe’s Faust were exceedingly helpful to me, was very well received,

not only on that occasion in Dresden, but later on in other places.

Besides this, I made use of the Dresden Anzeiger, by writing all kinds

of short and enthusiastic anonymous paragraphs, in order to whet the

public taste for a work which hitherto had been in ill-repute in

Dresden.

Not only did these purely extraneous exertions succeed in making the

receipts of that year by far exceed any that had been taken

theretofore, but the orchestra directors themselves, during the

remaining years of my stay in Dresden, made a point of ensuring

similarly large profits by repeated performances of the celebrated

symphony. Concerning the artistic side of the performance, I aimed at

making the orchestra give as expressive a rendering as possible, and to

this end made all kinds of notes, myself, in the various parts, so as

to make quite sure that their interpretation would be as clear and as

coloured as could be desired. It was principally the custom which

existed then of doubling the wind instruments, that led me to a most

careful consideration of the advantages this system presented, for, in

performances on a large scale, the following somewhat crude rule

prevailed: all those passages marked piano were executed by a single

set of instruments, while those marked forte were carried out by a

duplicated set. As an instance of the way in which I took care to

ensure an intelligible rendering by this means, I might point to a

certain passage in the second movement of the symphony, where the whole

of the string instruments play the principal and rhythmical figure in C

major for the first time; it is written in triple octaves, which play

uninterruptedly in unison and, to a certain degree, serve as an

accompaniment to the second theme, which is only performed by feeble

wood instruments. As fortissimo is indicated alike for the whole

orchestra, the result in every imaginable rendering must be that the

melody for the wood instruments not only completely disappears, but

cannot even be heard through the strings, which, after all, are only

accompanying. Now, as I never carried my piety to the extent of taking

directions absolutely literally, rather than sacrifice the effect

really intended by the master to the erroneous indications given, I

made the strings play only moderately loudly instead of real

fortissimo, up to the point where they alternate with the wind

instruments in taking up the continuation of the new theme: thus the

motive, rendered as it was as loudly as possible by a double set of

wind instruments, was, I believe for the first time since the existence

of the symphony, heard with real distinctness. I proceeded in this

manner throughout, in order to guarantee the greatest exactitude in the

dynamical effects of the orchestra. There was nothing, however

difficult, which was allowed to be performed in such a way as not to

arouse the feelings of the audience in a particular manner. For

example, many brains had been puzzled by the Fugato in 6/8 time which

comes after the chorus, Froh wie seine Sonnen fliegen, in the movement

of the finale marked alia marcia. In view of the preceding inspiriting

verses, which seemed to be preparing for combat and victory, I

conceived this Fugato really as a glad but earnest war-song, and I took

it at a continuously fiery tempo, and with the utmost vigour. The day

following the first performance I had the satisfaction of receiving a

visit from the musical director Anacker of Freiburg, who came to tell

me somewhat penitently, that though until then he had been one of my

antagonists, since the performance of the symphony he certainly

reckoned himself among my friends. What had absolutely overwhelmed him,

he said, was precisely my conception and interpretation of the Fugato.

Furthermore, I devoted special attention to that extraordinary passage,

resembling a recitative for the ‘cellos and basses, which comes at the

beginning of the last movement, and which had once caused my old friend

Pohlenz such great humiliation in Leipzig. Thanks to the exceptional

excellence of our bass players, I felt certain of attaining to absolute

perfection in this passage. After twelve special rehearsals of the

instruments alone concerned, I succeeded in getting them to perform in

a way which sounded not only perfectly free, but which also expressed

the most exquisite tenderness and the greatest energy in a thoroughly

impressive manner.

From the very beginning of my undertaking I had at once recognised,

that the only method of achieving overwhelming popular success with

this symphony was to overcome, by some ideal means, the extraordinary

difficulties presented by the choral parts. I realised that the demands

made by these parts could be met only by a large and enthusiastic body

of singers. It was above all necessary, then, to secure a very good and

large choir; so, besides adding the somewhat feeble Dreissig ‘Academy

of Singing’ to our usual number of members in the theatre chorus, in

spite of great difficulties I also enlisted the help of the choir from

the Kreuzschule, with its fine boys’ voices, and the choir of the

Dresden seminary, which had had much practice in church singing. In a

way quite my own I now tried to get these three hundred singers, who

were frequently united for rehearsals, into a state of genuine ecstasy;

for instance, I succeeded in demonstrating to the basses that the

celebrated passage Seid umschlungen, Millionen, and especially Bruder,

uber’m Sternenzelt muss ein guter Vater wohnen, could not be sung in an

ordinary manner, but must, as it were, be proclaimed with the greatest

rapture. In this I took the lead in a manner so elated that I really

think I literally transported them to a world of emotion utterly

strange to them for a while; and I did not desist till my voice, which

had been heard clearly above all the others, began to be no longer

distinguishable even to myself, but was drowned, so to speak, in the

warm sea of sound.

It gave me particular pleasure, with Mitterwurzer’s cooperation, to

give a most overwhelmingly expressive rendering of the recitative for

baritone: Freunde, nicht diese Tone. In view of its exceptional

difficulties this passage might almost be considered impossible to

perform, and yet he executed it in a way which showed what fruit our

mutual interchange of ideas had borne. I also took care that, by means

of the complete reconstruction of the hall, I should obtain good

acoustic conditions for the orchestra, which I had arranged according

to quite a new system of my own. As may be imagined, it was only with

the greatest difficulty that the money for this could be found;

however, I did not give up, and owing to a totally new construction of

the platform, I was able to concentrate the whole of the orchestra

towards the centre, and surround it, in amphitheatre fashion, by the

throng of singers who were accommodated on seats very considerably

raised. This was not only of great advantage to the powerful effect of

the choir, but it also gave great precision and energy to the finely

organised orchestra in the purely symphonic movements.

Even at the general rehearsal the hall was overcrowded. Reissiger was

guilty of the incredible stupidity of working up the public mind

against the symphony and drawing attention to Beethoven’s very

regrettable error. Gade, on the other hand, who came to visit us from

Leipzig, where he was then conducting the Gewandhaus Concerts, assured

me after the general rehearsal, that he would willingly have paid

double the price of his ticket in order to hear the recitative by the

basses once more; whilst Hiller considered that I had gone too far in

my modification of the tempo. What he meant by this I learned

subsequently when I heard him conducting intricate orchestral works;

but of this I shall have more to say later on.

There was no denying that the performance was, on the whole, a success;

in fact, it exceeded all our expectations, and was particularly well

received by the non-musical public. Among these I remember the

philologist Dr. Kochly, who came to me at the end of the evening and

confessed that it was the first time he had been able to follow a

symphonic work from beginning to end with intelligent interest. This

experience left me with a pleasant feeling of ability and power, and

strongly confirmed me in the belief, that if I only desired anything

with sufficient earnestness, I was able to achieve it with irresistible

and overwhelming success. I now had to consider, however, what the

difficulties were, which hitherto had prevented a similarly happy

production of my own new conceptions. Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, which

was still such a problem to so many, and had, at all events, never

attained to popularity, I had been able to make a complete success;

yet, as often as it was put on the stage, my Tannhäuser taught me that

the possibilities of its success had yet to be discovered. How was this

to be done? This was and remained the secret question which influenced

all my subsequent development.

I dared not, however, indulge at that time in any meditation on this

point with the view of arriving at any particular results, for the real

significance of my failure, of which I was inwardly convinced, stood

absolutely bare before me with all its terrifying lessons. Albeit, I

could no longer delay taking even the most disagreeable steps with the

view of warding off the catastrophe which menaced my financial

position.

I was led to this, thanks to the influence of a ridiculous omen. My

agent, the purely nominal publisher of my three operas—Rienzi, the

Fliegender Holländer, and Tannhäuser—the eccentric court music

publisher, C. F. Meser, invited me one day to the cafe known as the

‘Verderber’ to discuss our money affairs. With great qualms we talked

over the possible results of the Annual Easter Fair, and wondered

whether they would be tolerably good or altogether bad. I gave him

courage, and ordered a bottle of the best Haut-Sauterne. A venerable

flask made its appearance; I filled the glasses, and we drank to the

good success of the Fair; when suddenly we both yelled as though we had

gone mad, while, with horror, we tried to rid our mouths of the strong

Tarragon vinegar with which we had been served by mistake. ‘Heavens!’

cried Meser, ‘nothing could be worse!’ ‘True enough,’ I answered, ‘no

doubt there is much that will turn to vinegar for us.’ My good-humour

revealed to me in a flash that I must try some other way of saving

myself than by means of the Easter Fair.

Not only was it necessary to refund the capital which had been got

together by dint of ever-increasing sacrifices, in order to defray the

expenses of the publication of my operas; but, owing to the fact that I

had been obliged ultimately to seek aid from the usurers, the rumour of

my debts had spread so far abroad, that even those friends who had

helped me at the time of my arrival in Dresden were seized with anxiety

on my account. At this time I met with a really sad experience at the

hands of Madame Schroder-Devrient, who, as the result of her

incomprehensible lack of discretion, did much to bring about my final

undoing. When I first settled in Dresden, as I have already pointed

out, she lent me three thousand marks, not only to help me to discharge

my debts, but also to allow me to contribute to the maintenance of my

old friend Kietz in Paris. Jealousy of my niece Johanna, and suspicion

that I had made her (my niece) come to Dresden in order to make it

easier for the general management to dispense with the services of the

great artist, had awakened in this otherwise so noble-minded woman the

usual feelings of animosity towards me, which are so often met with in

the theatrical profession. She had now given up her engagement; she

even declared openly that I had been partly instrumental in obtaining

her dismissal; and abandoning all friendly regard for me, whereby she

deeply wronged me in every respect, she placed the I.O.U. I had given

her in the hands of an energetic lawyer, and without further ado this

man sued me for the payment of the money. Thus I was forced to make a

clean breast of everything to Lüttichau, and to beseech him to

intervene for me, and if possible to obtain a royal advance that would

enable me to clear my position, which was so seriously compromised.

My principal declared himself willing to support any request I might

wish to address to the King on this matter. To this end I had to note

down the amount of my debts; but as I soon discovered that the

necessary sum could only be assigned to me as a loan from the Theatre

Pension Fund, at an interest of five per cent., and that I should

moreover have to secure the capital of the Pension Fund by a life

insurance policy, which would cost me annually three per cent, of the

capital borrowed, I was, for obvious reasons, tempted to leave out of

my petition all those of my debts which were not of a pressing nature,

and for the payment of which I thought I could count on the receipts

which I might finally expect from my publishing enterprises.

Nevertheless, the sacrifices I had to make in order to repay the help

offered me increased to such an extent, that my salary of conductor, in

itself very slender, promised to be materially diminished for some time

to come. I was forced to make the most irksome efforts to gather

together the necessary sum for the life insurance policy, and was

therefore obliged frequently to appeal to Leipzig. In addition to this,

I had to overcome the most appalling doubts in regard both to my health

and to the probable length of my life, concerning which I fancied I had

heard all sorts of malicious apprehensions expressed by those who had

observed me but casually in the miserable condition which I was in at

that time. My friend Pusinelli, as a doctor who was very intimate with

me, eventually managed to give such satisfactory information concerning

the state of my health, that I succeeded in insuring my life at the

rate of three per cent.

The last of these painful journeys to Leipzig was, at all events, made

under pleasant circumstances owing to a kind invitation from the old

Maestro Louis Spohr. I was particularly pleased over this, because to

me it meant nothing less than an act of reconciliation. As a matter of

fact, Spohr had written to me on one occasion, and had declared that,

stimulated by the success of my Fliegender Holländer and his own

enjoyment of it, he had once more decided to take up the career of a

dramatic composer, which of recent years had brought him such scant

success. His last work was an opera—Die Kreuz-fahrer—which he had sent

to the Dresden theatre in the course of the preceding year in the hope,

as he himself assured me, that I would urge on its production. After

asking this favour, he drew my attention to the fact that in this work

he had made an absolutely new departure from his earlier operas, and

had kept to the most precise rhythmically dramatic declamation, which

had certainly been made all the more easy for him by the ‘excellent

subject.’ Without being actually surprised, my horror was indeed great

when, after studying not only the text, but also the score, I

discovered that the old maestro had been absolutely mistaken in regard

to the account he had given me of his work. The custom in force at that

time that the decision concerning the production of works should not,

as a rule, rest with one of the conductors alone, did not tend to make

me any less fearful of declaring myself emphatically in favour of this

work. In addition to this, it was Reissiger, who, as he had often

boasted, was an old friend of Spohr’s, whose turn it was to select and

produce a new work. Unfortunately, as I learned later, the general

management had returned Spohr’s opera to its author in such a curt

manner as to offend him, and he complained bitterly of this to me.

Genuinely concerned at this, I had evidently managed to calm and

appease him, for the invitation mentioned above was clearly a friendly

acknowledgment of my efforts. He wrote that it was very painful for him

to have to touch at Dresden on his way to one of the watering-places;

as, however, he had a real longing to make my acquaintance, he begged

me to meet him in Leipzig, where he was going to stay for a few days.

This meeting with him did not leave me unimpressed. He was a tall,

stately man, distinguished in appearance, and of a serious and calm

temperament. He gave me to understand, in a touching, almost apologetic

manner, that the essence of his education and of his aversion from the

new tendencies in music, had its origin in the first impressions he had

received on hearing, as a very young boy, Mozart’s Magic Flute, a work

which was quite new at that time, and which had a great influence on

his whole life. Regarding my libretto to Lohengrin, which I had left

behind for him to read, and the general impression which my personal

acquaintance had made on him, he expressed himself with almost

surprising warmth to my brother-in-law, Hermann Brockhaus, at whose

house we had been invited to dine, and where, during the meal, the

conversation was most animated. Besides this, we had met at real

musical evenings at the conductor Hauptmann’s as well as at

Mendelssohn’s, on which occasion I heard the master take the violin in

one of his own quartettes. It was precisely in these circles that I was

impressed by the touching and venerable dignity of his absolutely calm

demeanour. Later on, I learned from witnesses—for whose testimony, be

it said, I cannot vouch—that Tannhäuser, when it was performed at

Cassel, had caused him so much confusion and pain that he declared he

could no longer follow me, and feared that I must be on the wrong road.

In order to recover from all the hardships and cares I had gone

through, I now managed to obtain a special favour from the management,

in the form of a three months’ leave, in which to improve my health in

rustic retirement, and to get pure air to breathe while composing some

new work. To this end I had chosen a peasant’s house in the village of

Gross-Graupen, which is half-way between Pillnitz and the border of

what is known as ‘Saxon Switzerland.’ Frequent excursions to the

Porsberg, to the adjacent Liebethaler, and to the far distant bastion

helped to strengthen my unstrung nerves. While I was first planning the

music to Lohengrin, I was disturbed incessantly by the echoes of some

of the airs in Rossini’s William Tell, which was the last opera I had

had to conduct. At last I happened to hit on an effective means of

stopping this annoying obtrusion: during my lonely walks I sang with

great emphasis the first theme from the Ninth Symphony, which had also

quite lately been revived in my memory. This succeeded! At Pirna, where

one can bathe in the river, I was surprised, on one of my almost

regular evening constitutionals, to hear the air from the Pilgrim’s

Chorus out of Tannhäuser whistled by some bather, who was invisible to

me. This first sign of the possibility of popularising the work, which

I had with such difficulty succeeded in getting performed in Dresden,

made an impression on me which no similar experience later on has ever

been able to surpass. Sometimes I received visits from friends in

Dresden, and among them Hans von Bulow, who was then sixteen years old,

came accompanied by Lipinsky. This gave me great pleasure, because I

had already noticed the interest which he took in me. Generally,

however, I had to rely only on my wife’s company, and during my long

walks I had to be satisfied with my little dog Peps. During this summer

holiday, of which a great part of the time had at the beginning to be

devoted to the unpleasant task of arranging my business affairs, and

also to the improvement of my health, I nevertheless succeeded in

making a sketch of the music to the whole of the three acts of

Lohengrin, although this cannot be said to have consisted of anything

more than a very hasty outline.

With this much gained, I returned in August to Dresden, and resumed my

duties as conductor, which every year seemed to become more and more

burdensome to me. Moreover, I immediately plunged once more into the

midst of troubles which had only just been temporarily allayed. The

business of publishing my operas, on the success of which I still

counted as the only means of liberating me from my difficult position,

demanded ever-fresh sacrifices if the enterprise were to be made worth

while. But as my income was now very much reduced, even the smallest

outlays necessarily led me into ever-new and more painful

complications; and I once more lost all courage.

On the other hand, I tried to strengthen myself by again working

energetically at Lohengrin. While doing this, I proceeded in a manner

that I have not since repeated. I first of all completed the third act,

and in view of the criticism already mentioned of the characters and

conclusion of this act, I determined to try to make it the very pivot

of the whole opera. I wished to do this, if only for the sake of the

musical motive appearing in the story of the Holy Grail; but in other

respects the plan struck me as perfectly satisfactory.

Owing to previous suggestions on my part, Gluck’s Iphigenia in Aulis

was to be produced this winter. I felt it my duty to give more care and

attention to this work, which interested me particularly on account of

its subject, than I had given to the study of the Armida. In the first

place, I was upset by the translation in which the opera with the

Berlin score was presented to us. In order not to be led into false

interpretations through the instrumental additions which I considered

very badly applied in this score, I wrote for the original edition from

Paris. When I had made a thorough revision of the translation, with a

view merely to the correctness of declamation, I was spurred on by my

increasing interest to revise the score itself. I tried to bring the

poem as far as possible into agreement with Euripides’ play of the same

name, by the elimination of everything which, in deference to French

taste, made the relationship between Achilles and Iphigenia one of

tender love. The chief alteration of all was to cut out the inevitable

marriage at the end. For the sake of the vitality of the drama I tried

to join the arias and choruses, which generally followed immediately

upon each other without rhyme or reason, by connecting links, prologues

and epilogues. In this I did my best, by the use of Gluck’s themes, to

make the interpolations of a strange composer as unnoticeable as

possible. In the third act alone was I obliged to give Iphigenia, as

well as Artemis, whom I had myself introduced, recitatives of my own

composition. Throughout the rest of the work I revised the whole

instrumentation more or less thoroughly, but only with the object of

making the existing version produce the effect I desired. It was not

till the end of the year that I was able to finish this tremendous

task, and I had to postpone the completion of the third act of

Lohengrin, which I had already begun, until the New Year.

The first thing to claim my attention at the beginning of the year

(1847) was the production of Iphigenia. I had to act as stage manager

in this case, and was even obliged to help the scene-painters and the

mechanicians over the smallest details. Owing to the fact that the

scenes in this opera were generally strung together somewhat clumsily

and without any apparent connection, it was necessary to recast them

completely, in order so to animate the representation as to give to the

dramatic action the life it lacked. A good deal of this faultiness of

construction seemed to me due to the many conventional practices which

were prevalent at the Paris Opera in Gluck’s time. Mitterwurzer was the

only actor in the whole cast who gave me any pleasure. In the role of

Agamemnon he showed a thorough grasp of that character, and carried out

my instructions and suggestions to the letter, so that he succeeded in

giving a really splendid and intelligent rendering of the part. The

success of the whole performance was far beyond my expectations, and

even the directors were so surprised at the exceptional enthusiasm

aroused by one of Gluck’s operas, that for the second performance they,

on their own initiative, had my name put on the programme as ‘Reviser.’

This at once drew the attention of the critics to this work, and for

once they almost did me justice; my treatment of the overture, the only

part of the opera which these gentlemen heard rendered in the usual

trivial way, was the only thing that they could find fault with. I have

discussed and given an accurate account of all that relates to this in

a special article on ‘Gluck’s Overture to Iphigenia in Aulis’ and I

only wish to add here that the musician who made such strange comments

on this occasion was Ferdinand Hiller.

As in former years, the winter meetings of the various artistic

elements in Dresden which Hiller had inaugurated, continued to take

place; but they now assumed more the character of ‘salons’ in Hiller’s

own house, and it seemed to me intended solely for the purpose of

laying the foundations for a general recognition of Hiller’s artistic

greatness. He had already founded, among the more wealthy patrons of

art, the chief of whom was the banker Kaskel, a society for running

subscription concerts. As it was impossible for the royal orchestra to

be placed at his disposal for this purpose, he had to content himself

with members of the town and military bands for his orchestra, and it

cannot be denied that, thanks to his perseverance, he attained a

praiseworthy result. As he produced many compositions which were still

unknown in Dresden, especially from the domain of more modern music, I

was often tempted to go to his concerts. His chief bait to the general

public, however, seemed to lie in the fact that he presented unknown

singers (among whom, unfortunately, Jenny Lind was not to be found) and

virtuosos, one of which, Joachim, who was then very young, I became

acquainted with.

Hiller’s treatment of those works with which I was already well

acquainted, showed what his musical power was really worth. The

careless and indifferent manner in which he interpreted a Triple

Concerto by Sebastian Bach positively astounded me. In the tempo di

minuetto of the Eighth Symphony of Beethoven, I found that Hiller’s

rendering was even more astonishing than Reissiger’s and Mendelssohn’s.

I promised to be present at the performance of this symphony if I could

rely on his giving a correct rendering of the tempo of the third

phrase, which was generally so painfully distorted, He assured me that

he thoroughly agreed with me about it, and my disappointment at the

performance was all the greater when I found the well-known waltz

measure adopted again. When I called him to account about it he excused

himself with a smile, saying that he had been seized with a fit of

temporary abstraction just at the beginning of the phrase in question,

which had made him forget his promise. For inaugurating these concerts,

which, as a matter of fact, only lasted for two seasons, Hiller was

given a banquet, which I also had much pleasure in attending.

People in these circles were surprised at that time to hear me speak,

often with great animation, about Greek literature and history, but

never about music. In the course of my reading, which I zealously

pursued, and which drew me away from my professional activities to

retirement and solitude, I was at that time impelled by my spiritual

needs to turn my attention once more to a systematic study of this

all-important source of culture, with the object of filling the

perceptible gap between my boyhood’s knowledge of the eternal elements

of human culture and the neglect of this field of learning due to the

life I had been obliged to lead. In order to approach the real goal of

my desires—the study of Old and Middle High German—in the right frame

of mind, I began again from the beginning with Greek antiquity, and was

now filled with such overwhelming enthusiasm for this subject that,

whenever I entered into conversation, and by hook or by crook had

managed to get it round to this theme, I could only speak in terms of

the strongest emotion. I occasionally met some one who seemed to listen

to what I had to say; on the whole, however, people preferred to talk

to me only about the theatre because, since my production of Gluck’s

Iphigenia, they thought themselves justified in thinking I was an

authority on this subject. I received special recognition from a man to

whom I quite rightly gave the credit of being at least as well versed

as myself in the matter. This was Eduard Devrient, who had been forced

at that time to resign his position as stage manager-in-chief owing to

a plot against him on the part of the actors, headed by his own brother

Emil. We were brought into closer sympathy by our conversations in

connection with this, which led him into dissertations on the

triviality and thorough hopelessness of our whole theatrical life,

especially under the ruining influence of ignorant court managers,

which could never be overcome.

We were also drawn together by his intelligent understanding of the

part I had played in the production of Iphigenia, which he compared

with the Berlin production of the same piece, that had been utterly

condemned by him. He was for a long time the only man with whom I could

discuss, seriously and in detail, the real needs of the theatre and the

means by which its defects might be remedied. Owing to his longer and

more specialised experience, there was much he could tell me and make

clear to me; in particular he helped me successfully to overcome the

idea that mere literary excellence is enough for the theatre, and

confirmed my conviction that the path to true prosperity lay only with

the stage itself and with the actors of the drama.

From this time forward, till I left Dresden, my intercourse with Eduard

Devrient grew more and more friendly, though his dry nature and obvious

limitations as an actor had attracted me but little before. His highly

meritorious work, Die Geschichte der deutschen Schauspielkunst

(‘History of German Dramatic Art’), which he finished and published

about that time, threw a fresh and instructive light on many problems

which exercised my mind, and helped me to master them for the first

time.

At last I managed once more to resume my task of composing the third

act of Lohengrin, which had been interrupted in the middle of the

Bridal Scene, and I finished it by the end of the winter. After the

repetition, by special request, of the Ninth Symphony at the concert on

Palm Sunday had revived me, I tried to find comfort and refreshment for

the further progress of my new work by changing my abode, this time

without asking permission. The old Marcolini palace, with a very large

garden laid out partly in the French style, was situated in an outlying

and thinly populated suburb of Dresden.

It had been sold to the town council, and a part of it was to be let.

The sculptor, Hänel, whom I had known for a long time, and who had

given me as a mark of friendship an ornament in the shape of a perfect

plaster cast of one of the bas-reliefs from Beethoven’s monument

representing the Ninth Symphony, had taken the large rooms on the

ground floor of a side-wing of this palace for his dwelling and studio.

At Easter I moved into the spacious apartments, above him, the rent of

which was extremely low, and found that the large garden planted with

glorious trees, which was placed at my disposal, and the pleasant

stillness of the whole place, not only provided mental food for the

weary artist, but at the same time, by lessening my expenses, improved

my straitened finances. We soon settled down quite comfortably in the

long row of pleasant rooms without having incurred any unnecessary

expense, as Minna was very practical in her arrangements. The only real

inconvenience which in the course of time I found our new home

possessed, was its inordinate distance from the theatre. This was a

great trial to me after fatiguing rehearsals and tiring performances,

as the expense of a cab was a serious consideration. But we were

favoured by an exceptionally fine summer, which put me in a happy frame

of mind, and soon helped to overcome every inconvenience.

At this time I insisted with the utmost firmness on refraining from

taking any further share in the management of the theatre, and I had

most cogent reasons to bring forth in defence of my conduct. All my

endeavours to set in order the wilful chaos which prevailed in the use

of the costly artistic materials at the disposal of this royal

institution were repeatedly thwarted, merely because I wished to

introduce some method into the arrangements. In a carefully written

pamphlet which, in addition to my other work, I had compiled during the

past winter, I had drawn up a plan for the reorganisation of the

orchestra, and had shown how we might increase the productive power of

our artistic capital by making a more methodical use of the royal funds

intended for its maintenance, and showing greater discretion regarding

salaries. This increase in the productive power would raise the

artistic spirit as well as improve the economic position of the members

of the orchestra, for I should have liked them at the same time to form

an independent concert society. In such a capacity it would have been

their task to present to the people of Dresden, in the best possible

way, a kind of music which they had hitherto hardly had the opportunity

of enjoying at all. It would have been possible for such a union,

which, as I pointed out, had so many external circumstances in its

favour, to provide Dresden with a suitable concert-hall. I hear,

however, that such a place is wanting to this day.

With this object in view I entered into close communication with

architects and builders, and the plans were completed, according to

which the scandalous buildings facing a wing of the renowned prison

opposite the Ostra Allee, and consisting of a shed for the members of

the theatre and a public wash-house, were to be pulled down and

replaced by a beautiful building, which, besides containing a large

concert-hall adapted to our requirements, would also have had other

large rooms which could have been, let out on hire at a profit. The

practicality of these plans was disputed by no one, as even the

administrators of the orchestra’s widows’ fund saw in them an

opportunity for the safe and advantageous laying out of capital; yet

they were returned to me, after long consideration on the part of the

general management, with thanks and an acknowledgment of my careful

work, and the curt reply that it was thought better for things to

remain as they were.

All my proposals for meeting the useless waste and drain upon our

artistic capital by a more methodical arrangement, met with the same

success in every detail that I suggested. I had also found out by long

experience that every proposal which had to be discussed and decided

upon in the most tiring committee meetings, as for instance the

starting of a repertoire, might at any moment be overthrown and altered

for the worse by the temper of a singer or the plan of a junior

business inspector. I was therefore driven to renounce my wasted

efforts and, after many a stormy discussion and outspoken expression of

my sentiments, I withdrew from taking any part whatever in any branch

of the management, and limited myself entirely to holding rehearsals

and conducting performances of the operas provided for me.

Although my relations with Lüttichau grew more and more strained on

this account, for the time being it mattered little whether my conduct

pleased him or not, as otherwise my position was one which commanded

respect, on account of the ever-increasing popularity of Tannhäuser and

Rienzi, which were presented during the summer to houses packed with

distinguished visitors, and were invariably chosen for the gala

performances.

By thus going my own way and refusing to be interfered with, I

succeeded this summer, amid the delightful and perfect seclusion of my

new home, in preserving myself in a frame of mind exceedingly

favourable to the completion of my Lohengrin. My studies, which, as I

have already mentioned, I pursued eagerly at the same time as I was

working on my opera, made me feel more light-hearted than I had ever

done before. For the first time I now mastered AEschylus with real

feeling and understanding. Droysen’s eloquent commentaries in

particular helped to bring before my imagination the intoxicating

effect of the production of an Athenian tragedy, so that I could see

the Oresteia with my mind’s eye, as though it were actually being

performed, and its effect upon me was indescribable. Nothing, however,

could equal the sublime emotion with which the Agamemnon trilogy

inspired me, and to the last word of the Eumenides I lived in an

atmosphere so far removed from the present day that I have never since

been really able to reconcile myself with modern literature. My ideas

about the whole significance of the drama and of the theatre were,

without a doubt, moulded by these impressions. I worked my way through

the other tragedians, and finally reached Aristophanes. When I had

spent the morning industriously upon the completion of the music for

Lohengrin, I used to creep into the depths of a thick shrubbery in my

part of the garden to get shelter from the summer heat, which was

becoming more intense every day. My delight in the comedies of

Aristophanes was boundless, when once his Birds had plunged me into the

full torrent of the genius of this wanton favourite of the Graces, as

he used to call himself with conscious daring. Side by side with this

poet I read the principal dialogues of Plato, and from the Symposium I

gained such a deep insight into the wonderful beauty of Greek life that

I felt myself more truly at home in ancient Athens than in any

conditions which the modern world has to offer.

As I was following out a settled course of self-education, I did not

wish to pursue my way further in the leading-strings of any literary

history, and I consequently turned my attention from the historical

studies, which seemed to be my own peculiar province, and in which

department Droysen’s history of Alexander and the Hellenistic period,

as well as Niebuhr and Gibbon, were of great help to me, and fell back

once more upon my old and trusty guide, Jakob Grimm, for the study of

German antiquity. In my efforts to master the myths of Germany more

thoroughly than had been possible in my former perusal of the Nibelung

and the Heldenbuch, Mone’s particularly suggestive commentary on this

Heldensage filled me with delight, although stricter scholars regarded

this work with suspicion on account of the boldness of some of its

statements. By this means I was drawn irresistibly to the northern

sagas; and I now tried, as far as was possible without a fluent

knowledge of the Scandinavian languages, to acquaint myself with the

Edda, as well as with the prose version which existed of a considerable

portion of the Heldensage.

Read by the light of Mone’s Commentaries, the Wolsungasaga had a

decided influence upon my method of handling this material. My

conceptions as to the inner significance of these old-world legends,

which had been growing for a long time, gradually gained strength and

moulded themselves with the plastic forms which inspired my later

works.

All this was sinking into my mind and slowly maturing, whilst with

unfeigned delight I was finishing the music of the first two acts of

Lohengrin, which were now at last completed. I now succeeded in

shutting out the past and building up for myself a new world of the

future, which presented itself with ever-growing clearness to my mind

as the refuge whither I might retreat from all the miseries of modern

opera and theatre life. At the same time, my health and temper were

settling down into a mood of almost unclouded serenity, which made me

oblivious for a long time of all the worries of my position. I used to

walk every day up into the neighbouring hills, which rose from the

banks of the Elbe to the Plauenscher Grand. I generally went alone,

except for the company of our little dog Peps, and my excursions always

resulted in producing a satisfactory number of ideas. At the same time,

I found I had developed a capacity, which I had never possessed before,

for good-tempered intercourse with the friends and acquaintances who

liked to come from time to time to the Marcolini garden to share my

simple supper. My visitors used often to find me perched on a high

branch of a tree, or on the neck of the Neptune which was the central

figure of a large group of statuary in the middle of an old fountain,

unfortunately always dry, belonging to the palmy days of the Marcolini

estate. I used to enjoy walking with my friends up and down the broad

footpath of the drive leading to the real palace, which had been laid

especially for Napoleon in the fatal year 1813, when he had fixed his

headquarters there.

By August, the last month of summer, I had completely finished the

composition of Lohengrin, and felt that it was high time for me to have

done so, as the needs of my position demanded imperatively that I

should give my most serious attention to improving it, and it became a

matter of supreme importance for me once more to take steps for having

my operas produced in the German theatres.

Even the success of Tannhäuser in Dresden, which became more obvious

every day, did not attract the smallest notice anywhere else. Berlin

was the only place which had any influence in the theatrical world of

Germany, and I ought long before to have given my undivided attention

to that city. From all I had heard of the special tastes of Friedrich

Wilhelm IV., I felt perfectly justified in assuming that he would feel

sympathetically inclined towards my later works and conceptions if I

could only manage to bring them to his notice in the right light. On

this hypothesis I had already thought of dedicating Tannhäuser to him,

and to gain permission to do so I had to apply to Count Redern, the

court musical director. From him I heard that the King could only

accept the dedication of works which had actually been performed in his

presence, and of which he thus had a personal knowledge. As my

Tannhäuser had been refused by the managers of the court theatre

because it was considered too epic in form, the Count added that if I

wished to remain firm in my resolve, there was only one way out of the

difficulty, and that was to adapt my opera as far as possible to a

military band, and try to bring it to the King’s notice on parade. This

drove me to determine upon another plan of attack on Berlin.

After this experience I saw that I must open my campaign there with the

opera that had won the most decided triumph in Dresden. I therefore

obtained an audience of the Queen of Saxony, the sister of the King of

Prussia, and begged her to use her influence with her brother to obtain

a performance in Berlin by royal command of my Rienzi, which was also a

favourite with the court of Saxony. This manœuvre was successful, and I

soon received a communication from my old friend Küstner to say that

the production of Rienzi was fixed for a very early date at the Berlin

Court Theatre, and at the same time expressing the hope that I would

conduct my work in person. As a very handsome author’s royalty had been

paid by this theatre, at the instigation of Küstner, on the occasion of

the production of his old Munich friend Lachner’s opera, Katharina von

Cornaro, I hoped to realise a very substantial improvement in my

finances if only the success of Rienzi in this city in any degree

rivalled that in Dresden. But my chief desire was to make the

acquaintance of the King of Prussia, so that I might read him the text

of my Lohengrin, and arouse his interest in my work. This from various

signs I flattered myself was perfectly possible, in which case I

intended to beg him to command the first performance of Lohengrin to be

given at his court theatre.

After my strange experiences as to the way in which my success in

Dresden had been kept secret from the rest of Germany, it seemed to me

a matter of vital importance to make the future centre of my artistic

enterprises the only place which exercised any influence on the outside

world, and as such I was forced to regard Berlin. Inspired by the

success of my recommendation to the Queen of Prussia, I hoped to gain

access to the King himself, which I regarded as a most important step.

Full of confidence, and in excellent spirits, I set out for Berlin in

September, trusting to a favourable turn of Fortune’s wheel, in the

first place for the rehearsals of Rienzi, though my interests were no

longer centred in this work.

Berlin made the same impression on me as on the occasion of my former

visit, when I saw it again after my long absence in Paris. Professor

Werder, my friend of the Fliegender Holländer, had taken lodgings for

me in advance in the renowned Gensdarmeplatz, but when I looked at the

view from my windows every day I could not believe that I was in a city

which was the very centre of Germany. Soon, however, I was completely

absorbed by the cares of the task I had in hand.

I had nothing to complain of with regard to the official preparations

for Rienzi, but I soon noticed that it was looked upon merely as a

conductor’s opera, that is to say, all the materials to hand were duly

placed at my disposal, but the management had not the slightest

intention of doing anything more for me. All the arrangements for my

rehearsals were entirely upset as soon as a visit from Jenny Lind was

announced, and she occupied the Royal Opera exclusively for some time.

During the delay thus caused I did all I could to attain my main

object—an introduction to the King—and for this purpose made use of my

former acquaintance with the court musical director, Count Redern. This

gentleman received me at once with the greatest affability, invited me

to dinner and a soiree, and entered into a hearty discussion with me

about the steps necessary for attaining my purpose, in which he

promised to do his utmost to help me. I also paid frequent visits to

Sans-Souci, in order to pay my respects to the Queen and express my

thanks to her. But I never got further than an interview with the

ladies-in-waiting, and I was advised to put myself into communication

with M. Illaire, the head of the Royal Privy Council. This gentleman

seemed to be impressed by the seriousness of my request, and promised

to do what he could to further my wish for a personal introduction to

the King. He asked what my real object was, and I told him it was to

get permission from the King to read my libretto Lohengrin to him. On

the occasion of one of my oft-repeated visits from Berlin, he asked me

whether I did not think it would be advisable to bring a recommendation

of my work from Tieck. I was able to tell him that I had already had

the pleasure of bringing my case to the notice of the old poet, who

lived near Potsdam as a royal pensioner.

I remembered very well that Frau von Lüttichau had sent the themes

Lohengrin and Tannhäuser to her old friend some years ago, when these

matters were first mentioned between us. When I called upon Tieck, I

was welcomed by him almost as a friend, and I found my long talks with

him exceedingly valuable. Although Tieck had perhaps gained a somewhat

doubtful reputation for the leniency with which he would give his

recommendation for the dramatic works of those who applied to him, yet

I was pleased by the genuine disgust with which he spoke of our latest

dramatic literature, which was modelling itself on the style of modern

French stagecraft, and his complaint at the utter lack of any true

poetic feeling in it was heartfelt. He declared himself delighted with

my poem of Lohengrin, but could not understand how all this was to be

set to music without a complete change in the conventional structure of

an opera, and on this score he objected to such scenes as that between

Ortrud and Frederick at the beginning of the second act. I thought I

had roused him to a real enthusiasm when I explained how I proposed to

solve these apparent difficulties, and also described my own ideals

about musical drama. But the higher I soared the sadder he grew when I

had once made known to him my hope of securing the patronage of the

King of Prussia for these conceptions, and the working out of my scheme

for an ideal drama. He had no doubt that the King would listen to me

with the greatest interest, and even seize upon my ideas with warmth,

only I must not entertain the smallest hope of any practical result,

unless I wished to expose myself to the bitterest disappointment. ‘What

can you expect from a man who to-day is enthusiastic about Gluck’s

Iphigenia in Tauris, and to-morrow mad about Donizetti’s Lucrezia

Borgia?’ he said. Tieck’s conversation about these and similar topics

was much too entertaining and charming for me to give any serious

weight to the bitterness of his views. He gladly promised to recommend

my poem, more particularly to Privy Councillor Illaire, and dismissed

me with hearty goodwill and his sincere though anxious blessing. The

only result of all my labours was that the desired invitation from the

King still hung fire. As the rehearsals for Rienzi, which had been

postponed on account of Jenny Lind’s visit, were being carried on

seriously again, I made up my mind to take no further trouble before

the performance of my opera, as I thought myself, at any rate,

justified in counting on the presence of the monarch on the first

night, as the piece was being played at his express command, and at the

same time I hoped this would conduce to the fulfilment of my main

object. However, the nearer we came to the event the lower did the

hopes I had built upon it sink. To play the part of the hero I had to

be satisfied with a tenor who was absolutely devoid of talent, and far

below the average. He was a conscientious, painstaking man, and had

moreover been strongly recommended to me by my kind host, the renowned

Meinhard. After I had taken infinite pains with him, and had in

consequence, as so often happens, conjured up in my mind certain

illusions as to what I might expect from his acting, I was obliged,

when it came to the final test of the dress rehearsal, to confess my

true opinion. I realised that the scenery, chorus, ballet, and minor

parts were on the whole excellent, but that the chief character, around

whom in this particular opera everything centred, faded into an

insignificant phantom. The reception which this opera met with at the

hands of the public when it was produced in October was also due to

him; but in consequence of the fairly good rendering of a few brilliant

passages, and more especially on account of the enthusiastic

recognition of Frau Koster in the part of Adriano, it might have been

concluded from all the external signs that the opera had been fairly

successful. Nevertheless, I knew very well that this seeming triumph

could have no real substance, as only the immaterial parts of my work

could reach the eyes and ears of the audience; its essential spirit had

not entered their hearts. Moreover, the Berlin reviewers in their usual

way began their attacks immediately, with the view of demolishing any

success my opera might have won, so that after the second performance,

which I also conducted myself, I began to wonder whether my desperate

labours were really worth while.

When I asked the few intimate friends I had their opinion on this

point, I elicited much valuable information. Among these friends I must

mention, in the first place, Hermann Franck, whom I found again. He had

lately settled in Berlin, and did much to encourage me. I spent the

most enjoyable part of those sad two months in his company, of which,

however, I had but too little. Our conversation generally turned upon

reminiscences of the old days, and on to topics which had no connection

with the theatre, so that I was almost ashamed to trouble him with my

complaints on this subject, especially as they concerned my worries

about a work which I could not pretend was of any practical importance

to the stage. He for his part soon arrived at the conclusion that it

had been foolish of me to choose my Rienzi for this occasion, as it was

an opera which appealed merely to the general public, in preference to

my Tannhäuser, which might have educated a party in Berlin useful to my

higher aims. He maintained that the very nature of this work would have

aroused a fresh interest in the drama in the minds of people who, like

himself, were no longer to be counted among regular theatre-goers,

precisely because they had given up all hope of ever finding any nobler

ideals of the stage.

The curious information as to the character of Berlin art in other

respects, which Werder gave me from time to time, was most

discouraging. With regard to the public, he told me once that at a

performance of an unknown work, it was quite useless for me to expect a

single member of the audience from the stalls to the gallery to take

his seat with any better object in view than to pick as many holes as

possible in the production. Although Werder did not wish to discourage

me in any of my endeavours, he felt himself obliged to warn me

continually not to expect anything above the average from the cultured

society of Berlin. He liked to see proper respect paid to the really

considerable gifts of the King; and when I asked him how he thought the

latter would receive my ideas about the ennobling of opera, he

answered, after having listened attentively to a long and fiery tirade

on my part: ‘The King would say to you, “Go and consult Stawinsky!”’

This was the opera manager, a fat, smug creature who had grown rusty in

following out the most jog-trot routine. In short, everything I learned

was calculated to discourage me. I called on Bernhard Marx, who some

years ago had shown a kindly interest in my Fliegender Holländer, and

was courteously received by him. This man, who in his earlier writings

and musical criticisms had seemed to me filled with a fire of energy,

now struck me as extraordinarily limp and listless when I saw him by

the side of his young wife, who was radiantly and bewitchingly

beautiful. From his conversation I soon learned that he also had

abandoned even the remotest hope of success for any efforts directed

towards the object so dear to both our hearts, on account of the

inconceivable shallowness of all the officials connected with the head

authority. He told me of the extraordinary fate which had befallen a

scheme he had brought to the notice of the King for founding a school

of music. In a special audience the King had gone into the matter with

the greatest interest, and noticed the minutest detail, so that Marx

felt justified in entertaining the strongest possible hopes of success.

However, all his labours and negotiations about the business, in the

course of which he was driven from pillar to post, proved utterly

futile, until at last he was told to have an interview with a certain

general. This personage, like the King, had Marx’s proposals explained

to him in the minutest detail, and expressed his warmest sympathy with

the undertaking. ‘And there,’ said Marx, at the end of this long

rigmarole, ‘the matter ended, and I never heard another word about it.’

One day I learned that Countess Rossi, the renowned Henriette Sontag,

who was living in quiet seclusion in Berlin, had pleasant recollections

of me in Dresden, and wished me to visit her. She had at this time

already fallen into the unfortunate position which was so detrimental

to her artistic career. She too complained bitterly of the general

apathy of the influential classes in Berlin, which effectually

prevented any artistic aims from being realised. It was her opinion

that the King found a sort of satisfaction in knowing that the theatre

was badly managed, for though he never opposed any criticisms which he

received on the subject, he likewise never supported any proposal for

its improvement. She expressed a wish to know something of my latest

work, and I gave her my poem of Lohengrin for perusal. On the occasion

of my next morning call she told me she would send me an invitation to

a musical evening which she was going to have at her house in honour of

the Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, her elderly patron, and she

also gave me back the manuscript of Lohengrin, with the assurance that

it had appealed to her very much, and that while she was reading it she

had often seen the little fairies and elves dancing about in front of

her. As in the old days I had been heartily encouraged by the warm and

friendly sympathy of this naturally cultured woman, I now felt as if

cold water had been suddenly poured down my back. I soon took my leave,

and never saw her again. Indeed, I had no particular object in doing

so, as the promised invitation never came. Herr E. Kossak also sought

me out, and although our acquaintance did not lead to much, I was

sufficiently kindly received by him to give him my poem of Lohengrin to

read. I went one day by appointment to see him, and found that his room

had just been scrubbed with boiling water. The steam from this

operation was so unbearable that it had already given him a headache,

and was not less disagreeable to me. He looked into my face with an

almost tender expression when he gave me back the manuscript of my

poem, and assured me, in accents which admitted of no doubt of his

sincerity, that he thought it ‘very pretty.’

I found my casual intercourse with H. Truhn rather more entertaining. I

used to treat him to a good glass of wine at Lutter and Wegener’s,

where I went occasionally on account of its association with Hoffmann,

and he would then listen with apparently growing interest to my ideas

as to the possible development of opera and the goal at which we should

aim. His comments were generally witty and very much to the point, and

his lively and animated ways pleased me very much. After the production

of Rienzi, however, he too, as a critic, joined the majority of

scoffers and detractors. The only person who supported me stoutly but

uselessly, through thick and thin, was my old friend Gaillard. His

little music-shop was not a success, his musical journal had already

failed, so that he was only able to help me in small ways.

Unfortunately I discovered not only that he was the author of many

exceedingly dubious dramatic works, for which he wished to gain my

support, but also that he was apparently in the last stages of the

disease from which he was suffering, so that the little intercourse I

had with him, in spite of all his fidelity and devotion, only exercised

a melancholy and depressing influence upon me.

But as I had embarked upon this Berlin enterprise in contradiction to

all my inmost wishes, and prompted solely by the desire of winning the

success so vital to my position, I made up my mind to make a personal

appeal to Rellstab.

As in the case of the Fliegender Holländer he had taken exception more

particularly to its ‘nebulousness’ and ‘lack of form,’ I thought I

might with advantage point out to him the brighter and clearer outline

of Rienzi. He seemed to be pleased at my thinking I could get anything

out of him, but told me at once of his firm conviction that any new art

form was utterly impossible after Gluck, and that the only thing that

the best of good luck and hard work was capable of producing was

meaningless bombast. I then realised that in Berlin all hope had been

abandoned. I was told that Meyerbeer was the only man who had been able

in any way to master the situation.

This former patron of mine I met once more in Berlin, and he declared

that he still took an interest in me. As soon as I arrived I called on

him, but in the hall I found his servant busy packing up trunks, and

learned that Meyerbeer was just going away. His master confirmed this

assertion, and regretted that he would not be able to do anything for

me, so I had to say good-bye and how-do-you-do at the same time. For

some time I thought he really was away, but after a few weeks I learned

to my surprise that he was still staying in Berlin without letting

himself be seen by any one, and at last he made his appearance again at

one of the rehearsals of Rienzi. What this meant I only discovered

later from a rumour which was circulated among the initiated, and

imparted to me by Eduard von Bulow, my young friend’s father. Without

having the slightest idea how it originated, I learned, about the

middle of my stay in Berlin, from the conductor Taubert, that he had

heard on very good authority that I was trying for a director’s post at

the court theatre, and had good expectations of securing the

appointment in addition to special privileges. In order to remain on

good terms with Taubert, as it was very necessary for me to do, I had

to give him the most solemn assurances that such an idea had never even

entered my head, and that I would not accept such a position if it were

offered to me. On the other hand, all my endeavours to get access to

the King continued to be fruitless. My chief mediator, to whom I always

turned, was still Count Redern, and although my attention had been

called to his staunch adherence to Meyerbeer, his extraordinary open

and friendly manner always strengthened my belief in his honesty. At

last the only medium that remained open to me was the fact that the

King could not possibly stay away from the performance of Rienzi, given

at his express command, and on this conviction I based all further hope

of approaching him. Whereupon Count Redern informed me, with an

expression of deep despair, that on the very day of the first

performance the monarch would be away on a hunting party. Once more I

begged him to make very effort in his power to secure the King’s

presence, at least at the second performance, and at length my

inexhaustible patron told me that he could not make head or tail of it,

but his Majesty seemed to have conceived an utter disinclination to

accede to my wish; he himself had heard these hard words fall from the

royal lips: ‘Oh bother! have you come to me again with your Rienzi?’

At this second performance I had a pleasant experience. After the

impressive second act the public showed signs of wishing to call me,

and as I went from the orchestra to the vestibule, in order to be ready

if necessary, my foot slipped on the smooth parquet, and I might have

had perhaps a serious fall had I not felt my arm grasped by a strong

hand. I turned, and recognised the Crown Prince of Prussia,[14] who had

come out of his box, and who at once seized the opportunity of inviting

me to follow him to his wife, who wished to make my acquaintance. She

had only just arrived in Berlin, and told me that she had heard my

opera for the first time that evening, and expressed her appreciation

of it. She had, however, long ago received very favourable reports of

me and my artistic aims from a common friend, Alwine Frommann. The

whole tenor of this interview, at which the Prince was present, was

unusually friendly and pleasant.

[14] This Prince subsequently became the Emperor William the First. He

was given the title of Crown Prince in 1840 on the death of his

father, Frederick William III., as he was then heir-presumptive to his

brother, Frederick William IV., whose marriage was without

issue.—EDITOR.

It was indeed my old friend Alwine who in Berlin had not only followed

all my fortunes with the greatest sympathy, but had also done all in

her power to give me consolation and courage to endure. Almost every

evening, when the day’s business made it possible, I used to visit her

for an hour of recreation, and gain strength from her ennobling

conversation for the struggle against the reverses of the following

day. I was particularly pleased by the warm and intelligent sympathy

which she and our mutual friend Werder devoted to Lohengrin, the object

of all my labours at that time. On the arrival of her friend and

patroness, the Crown Princess, which had been delayed till now, she

hoped to hear something more definite as to how my affairs stood with

the King, although she intimated to me that even this great lady was in

deep disfavour, and could only bring her influence to bear upon the

King by observing the strictest etiquette. But from this source also no

news reached me till it was time for me to leave Berlin and I could

postpone my departure no longer.

As I had to conduct a third performance of Rienzi, and there still

remained a remote possibility of receiving a sudden command to

Sans-Souci, I accordingly fixed on a date which would be the very

latest I could wait to ascertain the fate of the projects I had nearest

to heart. This period passed by, and I was forced to realise that my

hopes of Berlin were wholly shattered.

I was in a very depressed state when I made up my mind to this

conclusion. I can seldom remember having been so dreadfully affected by

the influence of cold and wet weather and an eternally grey sky as

during those last wretched weeks in Berlin, when everything that I

heard, in addition to my own private anxieties, weighed upon me with a

leaden weight of discouragement.

My conversations with Hermann Franck about the social and political

situation had assumed a peculiarly gloomy tone, as the King of

Prussia’s efforts to summon a united conference had failed. I was among

those who had at first been inclined to see a hopeful significance in

this undertaking, but it was a shock to have all the intimate details

relating to the project clearly set before me by so well informed a man

as Franck. His dispassionate views on this subject, as well as on the

Prussian State in particular, which was supposed to be representative

of German intelligence, and was universally considered to be a model of

order and good government, so completely disillusioned me and destroyed

all the favourable and hopeful opinions I had formed of it, that I felt

as if I had plunged into chaos, and realised the utter futility of

expecting a prosperous settlement of the German question from this

quarter. If in the midst of my misery in Dresden I had founded great

hopes from gaining the King of Prussia’s sympathy for my ideas, I could

no longer close my eyes to the fearful hollowness which the state of

affairs disclosed to me on every side.

In this despairing mood I felt but little emotion when, on going to say

good-bye to Count Redern, he told me with a very sad face the news,

which had just arrived, of Mendelssohn’s death. I certainly did not

realise this stroke of fate, which Redern’s obvious grief first brought

to my notice. At all events, he was spared more detailed and heartfelt

explanation of my own affairs, which he had so much at heart.

The only thing that remained for me to do in Berlin was to try and make

my material success balance my material loss. For a stay of two months,

during which my wife and my sister Clara had been with me, lured on by

the hope that the production of Rienzi in Berlin would be a brilliant

success, I found my old friend, Director Küstner, by no means inclined

to compensate me. From his correspondence with me he could prove up to

the hilt that legally he had only expressed the desire for my

co-operation in studying Rienzi, but had given me no positive

invitation. As I was prevented by Count Redern’s grief over

Mendelssohn’s death from going to him for help in these trivial private

concerns, there was no alternative but for me to accept with a good

grace Küstner’s beneficence in paying me on the spot the royalties on

the three performances which had already taken place. The Dresden

authorities were surprised when I found myself obliged to beg an

advance of income from them in order to conclude this brilliant

undertaking in Berlin.

As I was travelling with my wife in the most horrible weather through

the deserted country on my way home, I fell into a mood of the blackest

despair, which I thought I might perhaps survive once in a lifetime but

never again. Nevertheless, it amused me, as I sat silently looking out

of the carriage into the grey mist, to hear my wife enter into a lively

discussion with a commercial traveller who, in the course of friendly

conversation, had spoken in a disparaging way about the ‘new opera

Rienzi.’ My wife, with great heat and even passion, corrected various

mistakes made by this hostile critic, and to her great satisfaction

made him confess that he had not heard the opera himself, but had only

based his opinion upon hearsay and the reviews. Whereupon my wife

pointed out to him most earnestly that ‘he could not possibly know

whose future he might not injure by such irresponsible comment.’

These were the only cheering and consoling impressions which I carried

back with me to Dresden, where I soon felt the direct results of the

reverses I had suffered in Berlin in the condolences of my

acquaintances. The papers had spread abroad the news that my opera had

been a dismal failure. The most painful part of the whole proceeding

was that I had to meet these expressions of pity with a cheerful

countenance and the assurance that things were by no means so bad as

had been made out, but that, on the contrary, I had had many pleasant

experiences.

This unaccustomed effort placed me in a position strangely similar to

that in which I found Hiller on my return to Dresden. He had given a

performance of his new opera, Conradin von Hohenstaufen, here just

about this time. He had kept the composition of this work a secret from

me, and had hoped to make a decided hit with it after the three

performances which took place in my absence. Both the poet and the

composer thought that in this work they had combined the tendencies and

effects of my Rienzi with those of my Tannhäuser in a manner peculiarly

suited to the Dresden public. As he was just setting out for

Dusseldorf, where he had been appointed concert-director, he commended

his work with great confidence to my tender mercies, and regretted not

having the power of appointing me the conductor of it. He acknowledged

that he owed his great success partly to the wonderfully happy

rendering of the male part of Conradin by my niece Johanna. She, in her

turn, told me with equal confidence that without her Hiller’s opera

would not have had such an extraordinary triumph. I was now really

anxious to see this fortunate work and its wonderful staging for

myself; and this I was able to do, as a fourth performance was

announced after Hiller and his family had left Dresden for good. When I

entered the theatre at the beginning of the overture to take my place

in the stalls, I was astonished to find all the seats, with a few

scarcely noticeable exceptions, absolutely empty. At the other end of

my row I saw the poet who had written the libretto, the gentle painter

Reinike. We moved, naturally, towards the middle of the space and

discussed the strange position in which we found ourselves. He poured

out melancholy complaints to me about Hiller’s musical setting to his

poetry; the secret of the mistake which Hiller had made about the

success of his work he did not explain, and was evidently very much

upset at the conspicuous failure of the opera. It was from another

quarter that I learned how it had been possible for Hiller to deceive

himself in such an extraordinary way. Frau Hiller, who was of Polish

origin, had managed at the frequent Polish gatherings which took place

in Dresden to persuade a large contingent of her countrymen, who were

keen theatre-goers, to attend her husband’s opera. On the first night

these friends, with their usual enthusiasm, incited the public to

applaud, but had themselves found so little pleasure in the work that

they had stayed away from the second performance, which was otherwise

badly attended, so that the opera could only be considered a failure.

By commandeering all the help that could possibly be got from the Poles

by way of applause, every effort was made to secure a third performance

on a Sunday, when the theatre generally filled of its own accord. This

object was achieved, and the Polish theatre aristocracy, with the

charity that was habitual to them, fulfilled their duty towards the

needy couple in whose drawing-room they had often spent such pleasant

evenings.

Once more the composer was called before the curtain, and everything

went off well. Hiller thereupon placed his confidence in the verdict on

the third performance, according to which his opera was an undoubted

success, just as had been the case with my Tannhäuser. The

artificiality of this proceeding was, however, exposed by this fourth

performance, at which I was present, and at which no one was under an

obligation to the departed composer to attend. Even my niece was

disgusted with it, and thought that the best singer in the world could

not make a success of such a tedious opera. Whilst we were watching

this miserable performance I managed to point out to the poet some

weaknesses and faults that were to be found in the subject-matter. The

latter reported my criticisms to Hiller, whereupon I received a warm

and friendly letter from Dusseldorf, in which Hiller acknowledged the

mistake he had made in rejecting my advice on this point. He gave me

plainly to understand that it was not too late to alter the opera

according to my suggestions; I should thus have had the inestimable

benefit of having such an obviously well-intentioned, and, in its way,

so significant, a work in the repertoire, but I never got so far as

that.

On the other hand, I experienced the small satisfaction of hearing the

news that two performances of my Rienzi had taken place in Berlin, for

the success of which Conductor Taubert, as he informed me himself,

thought he had won some credit on account of the extremely effective

combinations he had arranged. In spite of this, I was absolutely

convinced that I must abandon all hope of any lasting and profitable

success from Berlin, and I could no longer hide from Lüttichau that, if

I were to continue in the discharge of my duties with the necessary

good spirits, I must insist on a rise of salary, as, beyond my regular

income, I could not rely on any substantial success wherewith to meet

my unlucky publishing transactions. My income was so small that I could

not even live on it, but I asked nothing more than to be placed on an

equal footing with my colleague Reissiger, a prospect which had been

held out to me from the beginning.

At this juncture Lüttichau saw a favourable opportunity for making me

feel my dependence on his goodwill, which could only be secured by my

showing due deference to his wishes. After I had laid my case before

the King, at a personal interview, and asked for the favour of the

moderate increase in income which was my object, Lüttichau promised to

make the report he was obliged to give of me as favourable as possible.

How great was my consternation and humiliation when one day he opened

our interview by telling me that his report had come back from the

King. In it was set forth that I had unfortunately overestimated my

talent on account of the foolish praise of various friends in a high

position (among whom he counted Frau v. Konneritz), and had thus been

led to consider that I had quite as good a right to success as

Meyerbeer. I had thereby caused such serious offence that it might,

perhaps, be considered advisable to dismiss me altogether. On the other

hand, my industry and my praiseworthy performance with regard to the

revision of Gluck’s Iphigenia, which had been brought to the notice of

the management, might justify my being given another chance, in which

case my material condition must be given due consideration. At this

point I could read no further, and stupefied by surprise I gave my

patron back the paper. He tried at once to remove the obviously bad

impression it had made upon me by telling me that my wish had been

granted, and I could draw the nine hundred marks belonging to me at

once from the bank. I took my leave in silence, and pondered over what

course of action I must pursue in face of this disgrace, as it was

quite out of the question for me to accept the nine hundred marks.

But in the midst of these adversities a visit of the King of Prussia to

Dresden was one day announced, and at the same time by his special

request a performance of Tannhäuser was arranged. He really did make

his appearance in the theatre at this performance in the company of the

royal family of Saxony, and stayed with apparent interest from

beginning to end. On this occasion the King gave a curious explanation

for having stayed away from the performances of Rienzi in Berlin, which

was afterwards reported to me. He said he had denied himself the

pleasure of hearing one of my operas in Berlin, because it was

important to get a good impression of them, and he knew that in his own

theatre they would only be badly produced. This strange event had, at

any rate, the result of giving me back sufficient self-confidence to

accept the nine hundred marks of which I was in such desperate need.

Lüttichau also seemed to make a point of winning back my trust to some

extent, and I gathered from his calm friendliness that I must suppose

this wholly uncultured man had no consciousness of the outrage he had

done me. He returned to the idea of having orchestral concerts, in

accordance with the suggestions I had made in my rejected report on the

orchestra, and in order to induce me to arrange such musical

performances in the theatre, said the initiative had come from the

management and not from the orchestra itself. As soon as I discovered

that the profits were to go to the orchestra I willingly entered into

the plan. By a special device of my own the stage of the theatre was

made into a concert-hall (afterwards considered first-class) by means

of a sounding board enclosing the whole orchestra, which proved a great

success. In future six performances were to take place during the

winter months. This time, however, as it was the end of the year, and

we only had the second half of the winter before us, subscription

tickets were issued for only three concerts, and the whole available

space in the theatre was filled by the public. I found the preparations

for this fairly diverting, and entered upon the fateful year 1848 in a

rather more reconciled and amiable frame of mind.

Early in the New Year the first of these orchestral concerts took

place, and brought me much popularity on account of its unusual

programme. I had discovered that if any real significance were to be

given to these concerts, in distinction to those consisting of

heterogeneous scraps of music of every different species under the sun,

and which are so opposed to all serious artistic taste, we could only

afford to give two kinds of genuine music alternately if a good effect

was to be produced. Accordingly between two symphonies I placed one or

two longer vocal pieces, which were not to be heard elsewhere, and

these were the only items in the whole concert. After the Mozart

Symphony in D major, I made all the musicians move from their places to

make room for an imposing choir, which had to sing Palestrina’s Stabat

Mater, from an adaptation of the original recitative, which I had

carefully revised, and Bach’s Motet for eight voices: Singet dem Herrn

ein neues Lied (‘Sing unto the Lord a new song’); thereupon I let the

orchestra again take its place to play Beethoven’s Sinfonia Eroica, and

with that to end the concert.

This success was very encouraging, and disclosed to me a somewhat

consoling prospect of increasing my influence as musical conductor at a

time when my disgust was daily growing stronger at the constant

meddling with our opera repertoire, which made me lose more and more

influence as compared with the wishes of my would-be prima donna niece,

whom even Tichatschek supported. Immediately on my return from Berlin I

had begun the orchestration of Lohengrin, and in all other respects had

given myself up to greater resignation, which made me feel I could face

my fate calmly, when I suddenly received a very disturbing piece of

news.

In the beginning of February my mother’s death was announced to me. I

at once hastened to her funeral at Leipzig, and was filled with deep

emotion and joy at the wonderfully calm and sweet expression of her

face. She had passed the latter years of her life, which had before

been so active and restless, in cheerful ease, and at the end in

peaceful and almost childlike happiness. On her deathbed she exclaimed

in humble modesty, and with a bright smile on her face: ‘Oh! how

beautiful! how lovely! how divine! Why do I deserve such favour?’ It

was a bitterly cold morning when we lowered the coffin into the grave

in the churchyard, and the hard, frozen lumps of earth which we

scattered on the lid, instead of the customary handful of dust,

frightened me by the loud noise they made. On the way home to the house

of my brother-in-law, Hermann Brockhaus, where the whole family were to

gather together for an hour, Laube, of whom my mother had been very

fond, was my only companion. He expressed his anxiety at my unusually

exhausted appearance, and when he afterwards accompanied me to the

station, we discussed the unbearable burden which seemed to us to lie

like a dead weight on every noble effort made to resist the tendency of

the time to sink into utter worthlessness. On my return to Dresden the

realisation of my complete loneliness came over me for the first time

with full consciousness, as I could not help knowing that with the loss

of my mother every natural bond of union was loosened with my brothers

and sisters, each of whom was taken up with his or her own family

affairs. So I plunged dully and coldly into the only thing which could

cheer and warm me, the working out of my Lohengrin and my studies of

German antiquity.

Thus dawned the last days of February, which were to plunge Europe once

more into revolution. I was among those who least expected a probable

or even possible overthrow of the political world. My first knowledge

of such things had been gained in my youth at the time of the July

Revolution, and the long and peaceful reaction that followed it. Since

then I had become acquainted with Paris, and from all the signs of

public life which I saw there, I thought all that had occurred had been

merely the preliminaries of a great revolutionary movement. I had been

present at the erection of the forts detaches around Paris, which Louis

Philippe had carried out, and been instructed about the strategic value

of the various fixed sentries scattered about Paris, and I agreed with

those who considered that everything was ready to make even an attempt

at a rising on the part of the populace of Paris quite impossible.

When, therefore, the Swiss War of Separation at the end of the previous

year, and the successful Sicilian Revolution at the beginning of the

New Year, turned all men’s eyes in great excitement to watch the effect

of these risings on Paris, I did not take the slightest interest in the

hopes and fears which were aroused. News of the growing restlessness in

the French capital did indeed reach us, but I disputed Röckel’s belief

that any significance could be attached to it. I was sitting in the

conductor’s desk at a rehearsal of Martha when, during an interval,

Röckel, with the peculiar joy of being in the right, brought me the

news of Louis Philippe’s flight, and the proclamation of the Republic

in Paris. This made a strange and almost astonishing impression on me,

although at the same time the doubt as to the true significance of

these events made it possible for me to smile to myself. I too caught

the fever of excitement which had spread everywhere. The German March

days were coming, and from all directions ever more alarming news kept

coming in. Even within the narrow confines of my native Saxony serious

petitions were framed, which the King withstood for a long time; even

he was deceived, in a way which he was soon to acknowledge, as to the

meaning of this commotion and the temper that prevailed in the country.

On the evening of one of these really anxious days, when the very air

was heavy and full of thunder, we gave our third great orchestral

concert, at which the King and his court were present, as on the two

previous occasions. For the opening of this one I had chosen

Mendelssohn’s Symphony in A minor, which I had played on the occasion

of his funeral. The mood of this piece, which even in the would-be

joyful phrases is always tenderly melancholy, corresponded strangely

with the anxiety and depression of the whole audience, which was more

particularly accentuated in the demeanour of the royal family. I did

not conceal from Lipinsky, the leader of the orchestra, my regret at

the mistake I had made in the arrangement of that day’s programme, as

Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, also in a minor key, was to follow this

minor symphony. With a merry twinkle in his eyes the eccentric Pole

comforted me by exclaiming: ‘Oh, let us play only the first two

movements of the Symphony in C minor, then no one will know whether we

have played Mendelssohn in the major or the minor key.’ Fortunately

before these two movements began, to our great surprise, a loud shout

was raised by some patriotic spirit in the middle of the audience, who

called out ‘Long live the King!’ and the cry was promptly repeated with

unusual enthusiasm and energy on all sides. Lipinsky was perfectly

right: the symphony, with the passionate and stormy excitement of the

first theme, swelled out like a hurricane of rejoicing, and had seldom

produced such an effect on the audience as on that night. This was the

last of the newly inaugurated concerts that I ever conducted in

Dresden.

Shortly after this the inevitable political changes took place. The

King dismissed his ministry and elected a new one, consisting partly of

Liberals and partly even of really enthusiastic Democrats, who at once

proclaimed the well-known regulations, which are the same all over the

world, for founding a thoroughly democratic constitution. I was really

touched by this result, and by the heartfelt joy which was evident

among the whole population, and I would have given much to have been

able to gain access to the King, and convince myself of his hearty

confidence in the people’s love for him, which seemed to me so

desirable a consummation. In the evening the town was gaily

illuminated, and the King drove through the streets in an open

carriage. In the greatest excitement I went out among the dense crowds

and followed his movements, often running where I thought it likely

that a particularly hearty shout might rejoice and reconcile the

monarch’s heart. My wife was quite frightened when she saw me come back

late at night, tired out and very hoarse from shouting.

The events which took place in Vienna and Berlin, with their apparently

momentous results, only moved me as interesting newspaper reports, and

the meeting of a Frankfort parliament in the place of the dissolved

Bundestag sounded strangely pleasant in my ears. Yet all these

significant occurrences could not tear me for a single day from my

regular hours of work. With immense, almost overweening satisfaction, I

finished, in the last days of this eventful and historic month of

March, the score of Lohengrin with the orchestration of the music up to

the vanishing of the Knight of the Holy Grail into the remote and

mystic distance.

About this time a young Englishwomen, Madame Jessie Laussot, who had

married a Frenchman in Bordeaux, one day presented herself at my house

in the company of Karl Ritter, who was barely eighteen years of age.

This young man, who was born in Russia of German parents, was a member

of one of those northern families who had settled down permanently in

Dresden, on account of the pleasant artistic atmosphere of that place.

I remembered that I had seen him once before not long after the first

performance of Tannhäuser, when he asked me for my autograph for a copy

of the score of that opera, which was on sale at the music-shop. I now

learned that this copy really belonged to Frau Laussot, who had been

present at those performances, and who was now introduced to me.

Overcome with shyness, the young lady expressed her admiration in a way

I had never experienced before, and at the same time told me how great

was her regret at being called away by family affairs from her

favourite home in Dresden with the Ritter family, who, she gave me to

understand, were deeply devoted to me. It was with a strange, and in

its way quite a new, sensation that I bade farewell to this young lady.

This was the first time since my meeting with Alwine Frommann and

Werder, when the Fliegender Holländer was produced, that I came across

this sympathetic tone, which seemed to come like an echo from some old

familiar past, but which I never heard close at hand. I invited young

Ritter to come and see me whenever he liked, and to accompany me

sometimes on my walks. His extraordinary shyness, however, seemed to

prevent him from doing this, and I only remember seeing him very

occasionally at my house. He used to turn up more often with Hans von

Bulow, whom he seemed to know pretty well, and who had already entered

the Leipzig University as a student of law. This well-informed and

talkative young man showed his warm and hearty devotion to me more

openly, and I felt bound to reciprocate his affection. He was the first

person who made me realise the genuine character of the new political

enthusiasm. On his hat, as well as on his father’s, the black, red, and

gold cockade was paraded before my eyes.

Now that I had finished my Lohengrin, and had leisure to study the

course of events, I could no longer help myself sympathising with the

ferment aroused by the birth of German ideals and the hopes attached to

their realisation. My old friend Franck had already imbued me with a

fairly sound political judgment, and, like many others, I had grave

doubts as to whether the German parliament now assembling would serve

any useful purpose. Nevertheless, the temper of the populace, of which

there could be no question, although it might not have been given very

obvious expression, and the belief, everywhere prevalent, that it was

impossible to return to the old conditions, could not fail to exercise

its influence upon me. But I wanted actions instead of words, and

actions which would force our princes to break for ever with their old

traditions, which were so detrimental to the cause of the German

commonwealth. With this object I felt inspired to write a popular

appeal in verse, calling upon the German princes and peoples to

inaugurate a great crusade against Russia, as the country which had

been the prime instigator of that policy in Germany which had so

fatally separated the monarchs from their subjects. One of the verses

ran as follows:—

The old fight against the East

Returns again to-day.

The people’s sword must not rust

Who freedom wish for aye.

As I had no connection with political journals, and had learned by

chance that Berthold Auerbach was on the staff of a paper in Mannheim,

where the waves of revolution ran high, I sent him my poem with the

request to do whatever he thought best with it, and from that day to

this I have never heard or seen anything of it.

Whilst the Frankfort Parliament continued to sit on from day to day,

and it seemed idle to conjecture whither this big talk by small men

would lead, I was much impressed by the news which reached us from

Vienna. In the May of this year an attempt at a reaction, such as had

succeeded in Naples and remained indecisive in Paris, had been

triumphantly nipped in the bud by the enthusiasm and energy of the

Viennese people under the leadership of the students’ band, who had

acted with such unexpected firmness. I had arrived at the conclusion

that, in matters directly concerning the people, no reliance could be

placed on reason or wisdom, but only on sheer force supported by

fanaticism or absolute necessity; but the course of events in Vienna,

where I saw the youth of the educated classes working side by side with

the labouring man, filled me with peculiar enthusiasm, to which I gave

expression in another popular appeal in verse. This I sent to the

Oesterreichischen Zeitung, where it was printed in their columns with

my full signature.

In Dresden two political unions had been formed, as a result of the

great changes that had taken place. The first was called the Deutscher

Verein (German Union), whose programme aimed at ‘a constitutional

monarchy on the broadest democratic foundation.’ The names of its

principal leaders, among which, in spite of its broad democratic

foundation, my friends Eduard Devrient and Professor Rietschel had the

courage openly to appear, guaranteed the safety of its objects. This

union, which tried to include every element that regarded a real

revolution with abhorrence, conjured into existence an opposition club

which called itself the Vaterlands-Verein (Patriotic Union). In this

the ‘democratic foundation’ seemed to be the chief basis, and the

‘constitutional monarchy’ only provided the necessary cloak.

Röckel canvassed passionately for the latter, as he seemed to have lost

all confidence in the monarchy. The poor fellow was, indeed, in a very

bad way. He had long ago given up all hope of rising to any position in

the musical world; his directorship had become pure drudgery, and was,

unfortunately, so badly paid that he could not possibly keep himself

and his yearly increasing family on the income he derived from his

post. He always had an unconquerable aversion from teaching, which was

a fairly profitable employment in Dresden among the many wealthy

visitors. So he went on from bad to worse, running miserably into debt,

and for a long time saw no hope for his position as the father of a

family except in emigration to America, where he thought he could

secure a livelihood for himself and his dependants by manual labour,

and for his practical mind by working as a farmer, from which class he

had originally sprung. This, though tedious, would at least be certain.

On our walks he had of late been entertaining me almost exclusively

with ideas he had gleaned from reading books on farming, doctrines

which he applied with zeal to the improvement of his encumbered

position. This was the mood in which the Revolution of 1848 found him,

and he immediately went over to the extreme socialist side, which,

owing to the example set by Paris, threatened to become serious. Every

one who knew him was utterly taken aback at the apparently vital change

which had so suddenly taken place in him, when he declared that he had

at last found his real vocation—that of an agitator.

His persuasive faculties, on which, however, he could not rely

sufficiently for platform purposes, developed in private intercourse

into stupefying energy. It was impossible to stop his flow of language

with any objection, and those he could not draw over to his cause he

cast aside for ever. In his enthusiasm about the problems which

occupied his mind day and night, he sharpened his intellect into a

weapon capable of demolishing every foolish objection, and suddenly

stood in our midst like a preacher in the wilderness. He was at home in

every department of knowledge. The Vaterlands-Verein had elected a

committee for carrying into execution a plan for arming the populace;

this included Röckel and other thoroughgoing democrats, and, in

addition, certain military experts, among whom was my old friend

Hermann Muller, the lieutenant of the Guards who had once been engaged

to Schroder-Devrient. He and another officer named Zichlinsky were the

only members of the Saxon army who joined the political movement. The

part I played in the meetings of this committee, as in everything else,

was dictated by artistic motives. As far as I can remember, the details

of this plan, which at last became a nuisance, afforded very sound

foundation for a genuine arming of the people, though it was impossible

to carry it out during the political crisis.

My interest and enthusiasm about the social and political problems

which were occupying the whole world increased every day, until public

meetings and private intercourse, and the shallow platitudes which

formed the staple eloquence of the orators of the day, proved to me the

terrible shallowness of the whole movement.

If only I could rest assured that, while such senseless confusion was

the order of the day, people well versed in these matters would

withhold from any demonstration (which to my great regret I observed in

Hermann Franck, and told him of, openly), then, on the contrary, I

should feel myself compelled, as soon as the opportunity arose, to

discuss the purport of such questions and problems according to my

judgment. Needless to say, the newspapers played an exciting and

prominent part on this occasion. Once, when I went incidentally (as I

might go to see a play) to a meeting of the Vaterlands-Verein, when

they were assembled in a public garden, they chose for the subject of

their discussion, ‘Republic or Monarchy?’ I was astonished to hear and

to read with what incredible triviality it was carried on, and how the

sum-total of their explanation was, that, to be sure, a republic is

best, but, at the worst, one could put up with a monarchy if it were

well conducted. As the result of many heated discussions on this point,

I was incited to lay bare my views on the subject in an article which I

published in the DRESDENER ANZEIGER, but which I did not sign. My

special aim was to turn the attention of the few who really took the

matter seriously, from the external form of the government to its

intrinsic value. When I had pursued and consistently discussed the

utmost idealistic conclusions of all that which, to my mind, was

necessary and inseparable from the perfect state and from social order,

I inquired whether it would not be possible to realise all this with a

king at the head, and entered so deeply into the matter as to portray

the king in such a fashion, that he seemed even more anxious than any

one else that his state should be organised on genuinely republican

lines, in order that he might attain to the fulfilment of his own

highest aims. I must own, however, that I felt bound to urge this king

to assume a much more familiar attitude towards his people than the

court atmosphere and the almost exclusive society of his nobles would

seem to render possible. Finally, I pointed to the King of Saxony as

being specially chosen by Fate to lead the way in the direction I had

indicated, and to give the example to all the other German princes.

Röckel considered this article a true inspiration from the Angel of

Propitiation, but as he feared that it would not meet with proper

recognition and appreciation in the paper, he urged me to lecture on it

publicly at the next meeting of the Vaterlands-Verein for he attached

great importance to my discoursing on the subject personally. Quite

uncertain as to whether I could really persuade myself to do this, I

attended the meeting, and there, owing to the intolerable balderdash

uttered by a certain barrister named Blode and a master-furrier Klette,

whom at that time Dresden venerated as a Demosthenes and a Cleon, I

passionately decided to appear at this extraordinary tribunal with my

paper, and to give a very spirited reading of it to about three

thousand persons.

The success I had was simply appalling. The astounded audience seemed

to remember nothing of the speech of the Orchestral Conductor Royal

save the incidental attack I had made upon the court sycophants. The

news of this incredible event spread like wildfire. The next day I

rehearsed Rienzi, which was to be performed the following evening. I

was congratulated on all sides upon my self-sacrificing audacity. On

the day of the performance, however, I was informed by Eisolt, the

attendant of the orchestra, that the plans had been changed, and he

gave me to understand that thereby there hung a tale. True enough, the

terrible sensation I had made became so great, that the directors

feared the most unheard-of demonstrations at any performance of Rienzi.

Then a perfect storm of derision and vituperation broke loose in the

press, and I was besieged on all sides to such an extent that it was

useless to think of self-defence. I had even offended the Communal

Guard of Saxony, and was challenged by the commander to make a full

apology. But the most inexorable enemies I made were the court

officials, especially those holding a minor office, and to this day I

still continue to be persecuted by them. I learned that, as far as it

lay in their power, they incessantly besought the King, and finally the

director, to deprive me at once of my office. On account of this I

thought it necessary to write to the monarch personally, in order to

explain to him that my action was to be regarded more in the light of a

thoughtless indiscretion than as a culpable offence. I sent this letter

to Herr von Lüttichau, begging him to deliver it to the King, and to

arrange at the same time a short leave for me, so that the provoking

disturbance should have a chance of dying down during my absence from

Dresden. The striking kindness and goodwill which Herr von Lüttichau

showed me on this occasion made no little impression upon me, and this

I took no pains to conceal from him. As in the course of time, however,

his ill-controlled rage at various things, and especially at a good

deal that he had misunderstood in my pamphlet, broke loose, I learned

that it was not from any humane motives that he had spoken in such a

propitiatory manner to me, but rather by desire of the King himself. On

this point I received most accurate information, and heard that when

everybody, and even von Lüttichau himself, were besieging the King to

visit me with punishment, the King had forbidden any further talk on

the subject. After this very encouraging experience, I flattered myself

that the King had understood not only my letter, but also my pamphlet,

better than many others.

In order to change my mind a little, I determined for the present (it

was the beginning of July) to take advantage of the short period of

leave granted to me, by going to Vienna. I travelled by way of Breslau,

where I looked up an old friend of my family, the musical director

Mosewius, at whose house I spent an evening. We had a most lively

conversation, but, unfortunately, were unable to steer clear of the

stirring political questions of the day. What interested me most was

his exceptionally large, or even, if I remember rightly, complete

collection of Sebastian Bach’s cantatas in most excellent copies.

Besides this, he related, with a humour quite his own, several amusing

musical anecdotes which were a pleasant memory for many a year. When

Mosewius returned my visit in the course of the summer at Dresden, I

played a part of the first act of Lohengrin on the piano for him, and

the expression of his genuine astonishment at this conception was very

gratifying to me. In later years, however, I found that he had spoken

somewhat scoffingly about me; but I did not stop to reflect as to the

truth of this information, or as to the real character of the man, for

little by little I had had to accustom myself to the most inconceivable

things. At Vienna the first thing I did was to call on Professor

Fischhof, as I knew that he had in his keeping important manuscripts,

chiefly by Beethoven, among which the original of the C minor Sonata,

opus 111, I was particularly curious to see. Through this new friend,

whom I found somewhat dry, I made the acquaintance of Herr Vesque von

Puttlingen, who, as the composer of a most insignificant opera (Joan of

Arc), which had been performed in Dresden, had with cautious good taste

adopted only the last two syllables of Beethoven’s name—Haven. One day

we were at his house to dinner, and I then recognised in him a former

confidential official of Prince Metternich, who now, with his ribbon of

black, red, and gold, followed the current of the age, apparently quite

convinced. I made another interesting acquaintance in the person of

Herr von Fonton, the Russian state councillor, and attache at the

Russian Embassy in Vienna. I frequently met this man, both at

Fischhof’s house and on excursions into the surrounding country; and it

was interesting to me for the first time to run up against a man who

could so strongly profess his faith in the pessimistic standpoint, that

a consistent despotism guarantees the only order of things which can be

tolerated. Not without interest, and certainly not without

intelligence—for he boasted of having been educated at the most

enlightened schools in Switzerland—he listened to my enthusiastic

narration of the art ideal which I had in my mind, and which was

destined to exercise a great and decided influence upon the human race.

As he had to allow that the realisation of this ideal could not be

effected through the strength of despotism, and as he was unable to

foresee any rewards for my exertions, by the time we came to the

champagne he thawed to such a degree of affable good-nature as to wish

me every success. I learned later on that this man, of whose talent and

energetic character I had at the time no small opinion, was last heard

of as being in great distress.

Now, as I never undertook anything whatever without some serious object

in view, I had made up my mind to avail myself of this visit to Vienna,

in order to try in some practical manner to promote my ideas for the

reform of the theatre. Vienna seemed to me specially suitable for this

purpose, as at that, time it had five theatres, all totally different

in character, which were dragging on a miserable existence. I quickly

worked out a plan, according to which these various theatres might be

formed into a sort of co-operative organisation, and placed under one

administration composed not only of active members, but also of all

those having any literary connection with the theatre. With a view to

submitting my plan to them, I then made inquiries about persons with

such capacities as seemed most likely to answer my requirements.

Besides Herr Friedrich Uhl, whom I had got to know at the very

beginning through Fischer, and who did me very good service, I was told

of a Herr Franck (the same, I presume, who later on published a big

epic work called Tannhäuser), and a Dr. Pacher, an agent of

Meyerbeer’s, and a pettifogger of whose acquaintance later on I was to

have no reason to be proud. The most sympathetic, and certainly the

most important, of those chosen by me for the conference meeting at

Fischhof’s house, was undoubtedly Dr. Becher, a passionate and

exceedingly cultivated man. He was the only one present who seriously

followed the reading of my plan, although, of course, he by no means

agreed with everything. I observed in him a certain wildness and

vehemence, the impression of which returned to me very vividly some

months later, when I heard of his being shot as a rebel who had

participated in the October Insurrection at Vienna. For the present,

then, I had to satisfy myself with having read the plan of my theatre

reform to a few attentive listeners. All seemed to be convinced that

the time was not opportune for putting forward such peaceable schemes

of reform. On the other hand, Uhl thought it right to give me an idea

of what was at present all the rage in Vienna, by taking me one evening

to a political club of the most advanced tendencies. There I heard a

speech by Herr Sigismund Englander, who shortly afterwards attracted

much attention in the political monthly papers; the unblushing audacity

with which he and others expressed themselves that evening with regard

to the most dreaded persons in public power astounded me almost as much

as the poverty of the political views expressed on that occasion. By

way of contrast I received a very nice impression of Herr Grillparzer,

the poet, whose name was like a fable to me, associated as it was, from

my earliest days, with his Ahnfrau. I approached him also with respect

to the matter of my theatre reform. He seemed quite disposed to listen

in a friendly manner to what I had to say to him; he did not, however,

attempt to conceal his surprise at my direct appeals and the personal

demands I made of him. He was the first playwright I had ever seen in

an official uniform.

After I had paid an unsuccessful visit to Herr Bauernfeld, relative to

the same business, I concluded that Vienna was of no more use for the

present, and gave myself up to the exceptionally stimulating

impressions produced by the public life of the motley crowd, which of

late had undergone such marked changes. If the student band, which was

always represented in great numbers in the streets, had already amused

me with the extraordinary constancy with which its members sported the

German colours, I was very highly diverted by the effect produced when

at the theatres I saw even the ices served by attendants in the black,

red, and gold of Austria. At the Karl Theatre, in the Leopold quarter

of the town, I saw a new farce, by Nestroy, which actually introduced

the character of Prince Metternich, and in which this statesman, on

being asked whether he had poisoned the Duke of Reichstadt, had to make

his escape behind the wings as an unmasked sinner. On the whole, the

appearance of this imperial city—usually so fond of pleasure—impressed

one with a feeling of youthful and powerful confidence. And this

impression was revived in me when I heard of the energetic

participation of the youthful members of the population, during those

fateful October days, in the defence of Vienna against the troops of

Prince Windischgratz.

On the homeward journey I touched at Prague, where I found my old

friend Kittl (who had grown very much more corpulent) still in the most

terrible fright about the riotous events which had taken place there.

He seemed to be of opinion that the revolt of the Tschech party against

the Austrian Government was directed at him personally, and he thought

fit to reproach himself with the terrible agitation of the time, which

he believed he had specially inflamed by his composition of my operatic

text of Die Franzosen vor Nizza, out of which a kind of revolutionary

air seemed to have become very popular. To my great pleasure, on my

homeward journey I had the company of Hänel the sculptor, whom I met on

the steamer. There travelled with us also a Count Albert Nostitz, with

whom he had just settled up his business concerning the statue of the

Emperor Charles IV., and he was in the gayest mood, as the extremely

insecure state of Austrian paper money had led to his being paid at a

great profit to himself, in silver coin in accordance with his

agreement. I was very pleased to find that, thanks to this

circumstance, he was in such a confident mood, and so free from

prejudice, that on, arriving at Dresden he accompanied me the whole

way—a very long distance—from the landing-stage at which we had left

the steamer to my house, in an open carriage; and this despite the fact

that he very well knew that, only a few weeks before, I had caused a

really terrible stir in this very city.

As far as the public were concerned, the storm seemed quite to have

died down, and I was able to resume my usual occupations and mode of

life without any further trouble. I am sorry to say, however, that my

old worries and anxieties started afresh; I stood in great need of

money, and had not the vaguest notion whither to go in search of it. I

then examined very thoroughly the answer I had received during the

preceding winter to my petition for a higher salary. I had left it

unread, as the modifications made in it had already disgusted me. If I

had till now believed that it was Herr von Lüttichau who had brought

about the increase of salary I had demanded, in the shape of a

supplement which I was to receive annually—in itself a humiliating

thing—I now saw to my horror that all the time there had been no

mention save of one single supplement, and that there was nothing to

show that this should be repeated annually. On learning this, I saw

that I should now be at the hopeless disadvantage of coming too late

with a remonstrance if I should attempt to make one; so there was

nothing left for me but to submit to an insult which, under the

circumstances, was quite unprecedented. My feelings towards Herr von

Lüttichau, which shortly before had been rather warm owing to his

supposed kind attitude towards me during the last disturbance, now

underwent a serious change, and I soon had a new reason (actually

connected with the above-mentioned affair) for altering my favourable

opinion of him, and for turning finally against him for good and all.

He had informed me that the members of the Imperial Orchestra had sent

him a deputation demanding my instant dismissal, as they thought that

it affected their honour to be any longer under a conductor who had

compromised himself politically to the extent which I had. He also

informed me that he had not only reprimanded them very severely, but

that he had also been at great pains to pacify them concerning me. All

this, which Lüttichau had put in a highly favourable light, had

latterly made me feel very friendly towards him. Then, however, as the

result of inquiries into the matter, I heard accidentally through

members of the orchestra that the facts of the case were almost exactly

the reverse. What had happened was this, that the members of the

Imperial Orchestra had been approached on all sides by the officials of

the court, and had been not only earnestly requested to do what

Lüttichau had declared they had done of their own accord, but also

threatened with the displeasure of the King, and of incurring the

strongest suspicion if they refused to comply. In order to protect

themselves against this intrigue, and to avoid all evil consequences

should they not take the required step, the musicians had turned to

their principal, and had sent him a deputation, through which they

declared that, as a corporation of artists, they did not in the least

feel called upon to mix themselves up in a matter that did not concern

them. Thus the halo with which my former attachment to Herr von

Lüttichau had surrounded him at last disappeared for good and all, and

it was chiefly my shame at having been so very much upset by his false

conduct that now inspired me for ever with such bitter feelings for

this man. What determined this feeling even more than the insults I had

suffered, was the recognition of the fact that I was now utterly

incapable of ever being able to enlist his influence in the cause of

theatrical reform, which was so dear to me. It was natural that I

should learn to attach ever less and less importance to the mere

retention of the post of orchestral conductor on so extraordinarily

inadequate and reduced a salary; and in keeping to this office, I

merely bowed to what was an inevitable though purely accidental

circumstance of a wretched fate. I did nothing to make the post more

intolerable, but, at the same time, I moved not a finger to ensure its

permanence.

The very next thing I must do was to attempt to establish my hopes of a

larger income, so sadly doomed hitherto, upon a very much sounder

basis. In this respect it occurred to me that I might consult my friend

Liszt, and beg him to suggest a remedy for my grievous position. And lo

and behold, shortly after those fateful March days, and not long before

the completion of my Lohengrin score, to my very great delight and

astonishment, the very man I wanted walked into my room. He had come

from Vienna, where he had lived through the ‘Barricade Days,’ and he

was going on to Weimar, where he intended to settle permanently. We

spent an evening together at Schumann’s, had a little music, and

finally began a discussion on Mendelssohn and Meyerbeer, in which Liszt

and Schumann differed so fundamentally that the latter, completely

losing his temper, retired in a fury to his bedroom for quite a long

time. This incident did indeed place us in a somewhat awkward position

towards our host, but it furnished us with a most amusing topic of

conversation on the way home, I have seldom seen Liszt so extravagantly

cheerful as on that night, when, in spite of the cold and the fact that

he was clad only in ordinary evening-dress, he accompanied first the

music director Schubert, and then myself, to our respective homes.

Subsequently I took advantage of a few days’ holiday in August to make

an excursion to Weimar, where I found Liszt permanently installed and,

as is well known, enjoying a life of most intimate intercourse with the

Grand Duke. Even though he was unable to help me in my affairs, except

by giving me a recommendation which finally proved useless, his

reception of me on this short visit was so hearty and so exceedingly

stimulating, that it left me profoundly cheered and encouraged. On

returning to Dresden I tried as far as possible to curtail my expenses

and to live within my means; and, as every means of assistance failed

me, I resorted to the expedient of sending out a circular letter

addressed jointly to my remaining creditors, all of whom were really

friends; and in this I told them frankly of my situation, and enjoined

them to relinquish their demands for an indefinite time, till my

affairs took a turn for the better, as without this I should certainly

never be in a position to satisfy them. By this means they would, at

all events, be in a position to oppose my general manager, whom I had

every reason to suspect of evil designs, and who would have been only

too glad to seize any signs of hostility towards me, on the part of my

creditors, as a pretext for taking the worst steps against me. The

assurance I required was given me unhesitatingly; my friend Pusinelli,

and Frau Klepperbein (an old friend of my mother’s), even going so far

as to declare that they were prepared to give up all claim to the money

they had lent me. Thus, in some measure reassured, and with my position

relative to Lüttichau so far improved that I could consult my own

wishes as to whether and when I should give up my post entirely, I now

continued to fulfil my duties as a conductor as patiently and

conscientiously as I was able, while with great zeal I also resumed my

studies, which were carrying me ever further and further afield.

Thus settled, I now began to watch the wonderful developments in the

fate of my friend Röckel. As every day brought fresh rumours of

threatened reactionary coups d’etat and similar violent outbreaks,

which Röckel thought it right to prevent, he drew up an appeal to the

soldiers of the army of Saxony, in which he explained every detail of

the cause for which he stood, and which he then had printed and

distributed broadcast. This was too flagrant a misdeed for the public

prosecutors: he was therefore immediately placed under arrest, and had

to remain three days in gaol while an action for high treason was

lodged against him. He was only released when the solicitor Minkwitz

stood bail for the requisite three thousand marks (equal to L150). This

return home to his anxious wife and children was celebrated by a little

public festival, which the committee of the Vaterlands-Verein had

arranged in his honour, and the liberated man was greeted as the

champion of the people’s cause. On the other hand, however, the general

management of the court theatre, who had before suspended him

temporarily, now gave him his final dismissal. Röckel let a full beard

grow, and began the publication of a popular journal called the

Volksblatt, of which he was sole editor. He must have counted on its

success to compensate him for the loss of his salary as musical

director, for he at once hired an office in the Brudergasse for his

undertaking. This paper succeeded in attracting the attention of a

great many people to its editor, and showed up his talents in quite a

new light, he never got involved in his style or indulged in any

elaboration of words, but confined himself to matters of immediate

importance and general interest; it was only after having discussed

them in a calm and sober fashion, that he led up from them to further

deductions of still greater interest connected with them. The

individual articles were short, and never contained anything

superfluous, in addition to which they were so clearly written, that

they made an instructive and convincing appeal to the most uneducated

mind. By always going to the root of things, instead of indulging in

circumlocutions which, in politics, have caused such great confusion in

the minds of the uneducated masses, he soon had a large circle of

readers, both among cultivated and uncultivated people. The only

drawback was that the price of the little weekly paper was too small to

yield him a corresponding profit. Moreover, it was necessary to warn

him that if the reactionary party should ever come into power again, it

could never possibly forgive him for this newspaper. His younger

brother, Edward, who was paying a visit at the time in Dresden,

declared himself willing to accept a post as piano-teacher in England,

which, though most uncongenial to him, would be lucrative and place him

in a position to help Röckel’s family, if, as seemed probable, he met

his reward in prison or on the gallows. Owing to his connection with

various societies, his time was so much taken up that my intercourse

with him was limited to walks, which became more and more rare. On

these occasions I often got lost in the most wildly speculative and

profound discussions, while this wonderfully exciteable man always

remained calmly reflective and clear-headed. First and foremost, he had

planned a drastic social reform of the middle classes—as at present

constituted—by aiming at a complete alteration of the basis of their

condition. He constructed a totally new moral order of things, founded

on the teaching of Proudhon and other socialists regarding the

annihilation of the power of capital, by immediately productive labour,

dispensing with the middleman. Little by little he converted me, by

most seductive arguments, to his own views, to such an extent that I

began to rebuild my hopes for the realisation of my ideal in art upon

them. Thus there were two questions which concerned me very nearly: he

wished to abolish matrimony, in the usual acceptation of the word,

altogether. I thereupon asked him what he thought the result would be

of promiscuous intercourse with women of a doubtful character. With

amiable indignation he gave me to understand that we could have no idea

about the purity of morals in general, and of the relations of the

sexes in particular, so long as we were unable to free people

completely from the yoke of the trades, guilds, and similar coercive

institutions. He asked me to consider what the only motive would be

which would induce a woman to surrender herself to a man, when not only

the considerations of money, fortune, position, and family prejudices,

but also the various influences necessarily arising from these, had

disappeared. When I, in my turn, asked him whence he would obtain

persons of great intellect and of artistic ability, if everybody were

to be merged in the working classes, he met my objection by replying,

that owing to the very fact that everybody would participate in the

necessary labour according to his strength and capacity, work would

cease to be a burden, and would become simply an occupation which would

finally assume an entirely artistic character. He demonstrated this on

the principle that, as had already been proved, a field, worked

laboriously by a single peasant, was infinitely less productive than

when cultivated by several persons in a scientific way. These and

similar suggestions, which Röckel communicated to me with a really

delightful enthusiasm, led me to further reflections, and gave birth to

new plans upon which, to my mind, a possible organisation of the human

race, which would correspond to my highest ideals in art, could alone

be based. In reference to this, I immediately turned my thoughts to

what was close at hand, and directed my attention to the theatre. The

motive for this came not only from my own feelings, but also from

external circumstances. In accordance with the latest democratic

suffrage laws, a general election seemed imminent in Saxony; the

election of extreme radicals, which had now taken place nearly

everywhere else, showed us that if the movement lasted, there would be

the most extraordinary changes even in the administration of the

revenue. Apparently a general resolution had been passed to subject the

Civil List to a strict revision; all that was deemed superfluous in the

royal household was to be done away with; the theatre, as an

unnecessary place of entertainment for a depraved portion of the

public, was threatened with the withdrawal of the subsidy granted it

from the Civil List. I now resolved, in view of the importance which I

attached to the theatre, to suggest to the ministers that they should

inform the members of parliament, that if the theatre in its present

condition were not worth any sacrifice from the state, it would sink to

still more doubtful tendencies—and might even become dangerous to

public morals—if deprived of that state control which had for its aim

the ideal, and, at the same time, felt itself called upon to place

culture and education under its beneficial protection. It was of the

highest importance to me to secure an organisation of the theatre,

which would make the carrying out its loftiest ideals not only a

possibility but also a certainty. Accordingly I drew up a project by

which the same sum as that which was allotted from the Civil List for

the support of a court theatre should be employed for the foundation

and upkeep of a national theatre for the kingdom of Saxony. In showing

the practical nature of the well-planned particulars of my scheme, I

defined them with such great precision, that I felt assured my work

would serve as a useful guide to the ministers as to how they should

put this matter before parliament. The point now was to have a personal

interview with one of the ministers, and it occurred to me that the

best man to apply to in the matter would be Herr von der Pfordten, the

Minister of Education. Although he already enjoyed the reputation of

being a turncoat in politics, and was said to be struggling to efface

the origin of his political promotion, which had taken place at a time

of great agitation, the mere fact of his having formerly been a

professor was sufficient to make me suppose that he was a man with whom

I could discuss the question that I had so much at heart. I learned,

however, that the real art institutions of the kingdom, such, for

instance, as the Academy of Fine Arts, to whose number I so ardently

desired to see the theatre added, belonged to the department of the

Minister of the Interior. To this man—the worthy though not highly

cultivated or artistic Herr Oberlander—I submitted my plans, not,

however, without having first made myself known to Herr von der

Pfordten, in order, for the reasons above stated, to command my project

to him. This man, who apparently was very busy, received me in a polite

and reassuring manner; but his whole bearing, indeed the very

expression of his face, seemed to destroy all hopes I might ever have

cherished of finding in him that understanding which I had expected.

The minister Oberlander, on the other hand, earned my confidence by the

straightforward earnestness with which he promised a thorough inquiry

into the matter. Unfortunately, however, at the same time, he informed

me with the most simple frankness, that he could entertain but very

little hope of getting the King’s authorisation for any unusual

treatment of a question hitherto given over to routine. It must be

understood that the relations of the King to his ministers were both

strained and unconfidential, and that this was more especially so in

the case of Oberlander, who never approached the monarch on any other

business than that which the strictest discharge of his current duties

rendered indispensable. He therefore thought it would be better if my

plan could be brought forward, in the first place, by the Chamber of

Deputies. As, in the event of the new Civil List being discussed, I was

particularly anxious to avoid the question of the continuation of the

court theatre being treated in the ignorant and shortsighted radical

fashion, which was to be feared above all, I did not despair of making

the acquaintance of some of the most influential among the new members

of parliament. In this wise I found myself suddenly plunged into quite

a new and strange world, and became acquainted with persons and

opinions, the very existence of which until then I had not even

suspected. I found it somewhat trying always to be obliged to meet

these gentlemen at their beer and shrouded in the dense clouds of their

tobacco smoke, and to have to discuss with them matters which, though

very dear to me, must have seemed a little fantastic to their mind.

After a certain Herr von Trutschler, a very handsome, energetic man,

whose seriousness was almost gloomy, had listened to me calmly for some

time, and had told me that he no longer knew anything about the state,

but only about society, and that the latter would know, without either

his or my aid, how it should act in regard to art and to the theatre, I

was filled with such extraordinary feelings, half mingled with shame,

that there and then I gave up, not only all my exertions, but all my

hopes as well. The only reminder I ever had of the whole affair came

some while, after when, on meeting Herr von Lüttichau, I quickly

gathered from his attitude to me that he had got wind of the episode,

and that it only inspired him with fresh hostility towards me.

During my walks, which I now took absolutely alone, I thought ever more

deeply—and much to the relief of my mind—over my ideas concerning that

state of human society for which the boldest hopes and efforts of the

socialists and communists, then busily engaged in constructing their

system, offered me but the roughest foundation. These efforts could

begin to have some meaning and value for me only when they had attained

to that political revolution and reconstruction which they aimed at;

for it was only then that I, in my turn, could start my reforms in art.

At the same time my thoughts were busy with a drama, in which the

Emperor Frederick I. (surnamed ‘Barbarossa’) was to be the hero. In it

the model ruler was portrayed in a manner which lent him the greatest

and most powerful significance. His dignified resignation at the

impossibility of making his ideals prevail was intended not only to

present a true transcript of the arbitrary multifariousness of the

things of this world, but also to arouse sympathy for the hero. I

wished to carry out this drama in popular rhyme, and in the style of

the German used by our epic poets of the Middle Ages, and in this

respect the poem Alexander, by the priest Lambert, struck me as a good

example; but I never got further with this play than to sketch its

outline in the broadest manner possible. The five acts were planned in

the following manner: Act i. Imperial Diet in the Roncaglian fields, a

demonstration of the significance of imperial power which should extend

even to the investiture of water and air; Act ii. the siege and capture

of Milan; Act iii. revolt of Henry the Lion and his overthrow at

Ligano; Act iv. Imperial Diet in Augsburg, the humiliation and

punishment of Henry the Lion; Act v. Imperial Diet and grand court

assembly at Mainz; peace with the Lombards, reconciliation with the

Pope, acceptance of the Cross, and the departure for the East. I lost

all interest, however, in the carrying out of this dramatic scheme

directly I discovered its resemblance to the subject-matter of the

Nibelungen and Siegfried myths, which possessed a more powerful

attraction for me. The points of similarity which I recognised between

the history and the legend in question then induced me to write a

treatise on the subject; and in this I was assisted by some stimulating

monographs (found in the royal library), written by authors whose names

have now escaped my memory, but which taught me in a very attractive

manner a considerable amount about the old original kingdom of Germany.

Later on I published this fairly extensive essay with the title of Die

Nibelungen, but in working it out I finally lost all inclination to

elaborate the historical material for a real drama.

In direct connection with this I began to sketch a clear summary of the

form which the old original Nibelungen myth had assumed in my mind in

its immediate association with the mythological legend of the gods—a

form which, though full of detail, was yet much condensed in its

leading features. Thanks to this work, I was able to convert the chief

part of the material itself into a musical drama. It was only by

degrees, however, and after long hesitation that I dared to enter more

deeply into my plans for this work; for the thought of the practical

realisation of such a work on our stage literally appalled me. I must

confess that it required all the despair which I then felt of ever

having the chance of doing anything more for our theatre, to give me

the necessary courage to begin upon this new work. Until that time I

simply allowed myself to drift, while I meditated listlessly upon the

possibility of things pursuing their course further under the existing

circumstances. In regard to Lohengrin, I had got to that point when I

hoped for nothing more than the best possible production of it at the

Dresden theatre, and felt that I should have to be satisfied in all

respects, and for all time, if I were able to achieve even that. I had

duly announced the completion of the score to Herr von Lüttichau; but,

in consideration of the unfavourable nature of my circumstances at the

time, I had left it entirely to him to decide when my work should be

produced.

Meanwhile the time arrived when the keeper of the Archives of the Royal

Orchestra called to mind that it was just three hundred years since

this royal institution had been founded, and that a jubilee would

therefore have to be celebrated. To this end a great concert festival

was planned, the programme of which was to be made up of the

compositions of all the Saxon orchestral conductors that had lived

since the institution had been founded. The whole body of musicians,

with both their conductors at their head, were first to present their

grateful homage to the King in Pillnitz; and on this occasion a

musician was, for the first time, to be elevated to the rank of Knight

of the Civil Order of Merit of Saxony. This musician was my colleague

Reissiger. Until then he had been treated by the court, and by the

manager himself, in the most scornful manner possible, but had, owing

to his conspicuous loyalty at this critical time, especially to me,

found exceptional favour in the eyes of our committees. When he

appeared before the public decorated with the wonderful order, he was

greeted with great jubilation by the loyal audience that filled the

theatre on the evening of the festival concert. His overture to Yelva

was also received with a perfect uproar of enthusiastic applause, such

as had never fallen to his lot; whereas the finale of the first act

from Lohengrin, which was produced as the work of the youngest

conductor, was accorded only an indifferent reception. This was all the

more strange as I was quite unaccustomed to such coolness in regard to

my work on the part of the Dresden public. Following upon the concert,

there was a festive supper, and when this was over, as all kinds of

speeches were being made, I freely proclaimed to the orchestra, in a

loud and decided tone, my views as to what was desirable for their

perfection in the future. Hereupon Marschner, who, as a former musical

conductor in Dresden, had been invited to the jubilee celebrations,

expressed the opinion that I should do myself a great deal of harm by

holding too good an opinion of the musicians. He said I ought just to

consider how uncultivated these people were with whom I had to deal; he

pointed out that they were trained simply for the one instrument they

played; and asked me whether I did not think that by discoursing to

them on the aspirations of art I would produce not only confusion, but

even perhaps bad blood? Far more pleasant to me than these festivities

is the remembrance of the quiet memorial ceremony which united us on

the morning of the Jubilee Day, with the object of placing wreaths on

Weber’s grave. As nobody could find a word to utter, and even Marschner

was able to give expression only to the very driest and most trivial of

speeches about the departed master, I felt it incumbent upon me to say

a few heartfelt words concerning the memorial ceremony for which we

were gathered together. This brief spell of artistic activity was

speedily broken by fresh excitements, which kept pouring in upon us

from the political world. The events of October in Vienna awakened our

liveliest sympathy, and our walls daily blazed with red and black

placards, with summonses to march on Vienna, with the curse of ‘Red

Monarchy,’ as opposed to the hated ‘Red Republic,’ and with other

equally startling matter. Except for those who were best informed as to

the course of events—and who certainly did not swarm in our

streets—these occurrences aroused great uneasiness everywhere. With the

entry of Windischgratz into Vienna, the acquittal of Frobel and the

execution of Blum, it seemed as though even Dresden were on the eve of

an explosion. A vast demonstration of mourning was organised for Blum,

with an endless procession through the streets. At the head marched the

ministry, among whom the people were particularly glad to see Herr von

der Pfordten taking a sympathetic share in the ceremony, as he had

already become an object of suspicion to them. From that day gloomy

forebodings of disaster grew ever more prevalent on every side. People

even went so far as to say, with little attempt at circumlocution, that

the execution of Blum had been an act of friendship on the part of the

Archduchess Sophia to her sister, the Queen of Saxony, for during his

agitation in Leipzig the man had made himself both hated and feared.

Troops of Viennese fugitives, disguised as members of the student

bands, began to arrive in Dresden, and made a formidable addition to

its population, which from this time forth paraded the streets with

ever-increasing confidence. One day, as I was on my way to the theatre

to conduct a performance of Rienzi, the choir-master informed me that

several foreign gentlemen had been asking for me. Thereupon half a

dozen persons presented themselves, greeted me as a brother democrat,

and begged me to procure them free entrance tickets. Among them I

recognised a former dabbler in literature, a man named Hafner, a little

hunchback, in a Calabrian hat cocked at a terrific angle, to whom I had

been introduced by Uhl on the occasion of my visit to the Vienna

political club. Great as was my embarrassment at this visit, which

evidently astonished our musicians, I felt in no wise compelled to make

any compromising admission, but quietly went to the booking-office,

took six tickets and handed them to my strange visitors, who parted

from me before all the world with much hearty shaking of hands. Whether

this evening call improved my position as musical conductor in Dresden

in the minds of the theatrical officials and others, may well be

doubted; but, at all events, on no occasion was I so frantically called

for after every act as at this particular performance of Rienzi.

Indeed, at this time I seemed to have won over to my side a party of

almost passionate adherents among the theatre-going public, in

opposition to the clique which had shown such marked coldness on the

occasion of the gala concert already mentioned. It mattered not whether

Tannhäuser or Rienzi were being played, I was always greeted with

special applause; and although the political tendencies of this party

may have given our management some cause for alarm, yet it forced them

to regard me with a certain amount of awe. One day Lüttichau proposed

to have my Lohengrin performed at an early date. I explained my reasons

for not having offered it to him before, but declared myself ready to

further his wishes, as I considered the opera company was now

sufficiently powerful. The son of my old friend, F. Heine, had just

returned from Paris, where he had been sent by the Dresden management

to study scene-painting under the artists Desplechin and Dieterle. By

way of testing his powers, with a view to an engagement at the Dresden

Royal Theatre, the task of preparing suitable scenery for this opera

was entrusted to him. He had already asked permission to do this for

Lohengrin at the instigation of Lüttichau, who wished to call attention

to my latest work. Consequently, when I gave my consent, young Heine’s

wish was granted.

I regarded this turn of events with no little satisfaction, believing

that in the study of this particular work I should find a wholesome and

effective diversion from all the excitement and confusion of recent

events. My horror, therefore, was all the greater, when young Wilhelm

Heine one day came to my room with the news that the scenery for

Lohengrin had been suddenly countermanded, and instructions given him

to prepare for another opera. I did not make any remark, nor ask the

reason for this singular behaviour. The assurances which Luttichan

afterwards made to my wife—if they were really true—made me regret

having laid the chief blame for this mortification at his door, and

having thereby irrevocably alienated my sympathy from him. When she

asked him about this many years later, he assured her that he had found

the court vehemently hostile to me, and that his well-meant attempts to

produce my work had met with insuperable obstacles.

However that may have been, the bitterness I now experienced wrought a

decisive effect upon my feelings. Not only did I relinquish all hope of

a reconciliation with the theatre authorities by a splendid production

of my Lohengrin, but I determined to turn my back for ever on the

theatre, and to make no further attempt to meddle with its concerns. By

this act I expressed not merely my utter indifference as to whether I

kept my position as musical conductor or no, but my artistic ambitions

also entirely cut me off from all possibility of ever cultivating

modern theatrical conditions again.

I at once proceeded to execute my long-cherished plans for Siegfried’s

Tod, which I had been half afraid of before. In this work I no longer

gave a thought to the Dresden or any other court theatre in the world;

my sole preoccupation was to produce something that should free me,

once and for all, from this irrational subservience. As I could get

nothing more from Röckel in this connection, I now corresponded

exclusively with Eduard Devrient on matters connected with the theatre

and dramatic art. When, on the completion of my poem, I read it to him,

he listened with amazement, and at once realised the fact that such a

production would be an absolute drug in the modern theatrical market,

and he naturally could not agree to let it remain so. On the other

hand, he tried so far to reconcile himself to my work as to try and

make it less startling and more adapted for actual production. He

proved the sincerity of his intentions by pointing out my error in

asking too much of the public, and requiring it to supply from its own

knowledge many things necessary for a right under-standing of my

subject-matter, at which I had only hinted in brief and scattered

suggestions. He showed me, for instance, that before Siegfried and

Brunhilda are displayed in a position of bitter hostility towards each

other, they ought first to have been presented in their true and calmer

relationship. I had, in fact, opened the poem of SIEGFRIED’S TOD with

those scenes which now form the first act of the GOTTERDAMMERUNG. The

details of Siegfried’s relation to Brunhilda had been merely outlined

to the listeners in a lyrico-episodical dialogue between the hero’s

wife, whom he had left behind in solitude, and a crowd of Valkyries

passing before her rock. To my great joy, Devrient’s hint on this point

directed my thoughts to those scenes which I afterwards worked out in

the prologue of this drama.

This and other matters of a similar nature brought me into intimate

contact with Eduard Devrient, and made our intercourse much more lively

and pleasant. He often invited a select circle of friends to attend

dramatic readings at his house in which I gladly took part, for I

found, to my surprise, that his gift for declamation, which quite

forsook him on the stage, here stood out in strong relief. It was,

moreover, a consolation to pour into a sympathetic ear my worries about

my growing unpopularity with the director. Devrient seemed particularly

anxious to prevent a definite breach; but of this there was little

hope. With the approach of winter the court had returned to town, and

once more frequented the theatre, and various signs of dissatisfaction

in high quarters with my behaviour as conductor began to be manifested.

On one occasion the Queen thought that I had conducted NORMA badly, and

on another that I ‘had taken the time wrongly’ in ROBERT THE DEVIL. As

Luettichau had to communicate these reprimands to me, it was natural

that our intercourse at such times should hardly be of a nature to

restore our mutual satisfaction with each other.

Notwithstanding all this, it still seemed possible to prevent matters

from coming to a crisis, though everything continued in a state of

agitating uncertainty and fermentation. At all events the forces of

reaction, which were holding themselves in readiness on every side,

were not yet sufficiently certain that the hour of their triumph had

come as not to consider it advisable for the present, at least, to

avoid all provocation. Consequently our management did not meddle with

the musicians of the royal orchestra, who, in obedience to the spirit

of the times, had formed a union for debate and the protection of their

artistic and civic interests. In this matter one of our youngest

musicians, Theodor Uhlig, had been particularly active. He was a young

man, still in his early twenties, and was a violinist in the orchestra.

His face was strikingly mild, intelligent and noble, and he was

conspicuous among his fellows on account of his great seriousness and

his quiet but unusually firm character. He had particularly attracted

my notice on several occasions by his quick insight and extensive

knowledge of music. As I recognised in him a spirit keenly alert in

every direction, and unusually eager for culture, it was not long

before I chose him as my companion in my regular walks—a habit I still

continued to cultivate—and on which Roeckel had hitherto accompanied

me. He induced me to come to a meeting of this union of the orchestral

company, in order that I might form an opinion about it, and encourage

and support so praiseworthy a movement. On this occasion I communicated

to its members the contents of my memorandum to the director, which had

been rejected a year before, and in which I had made suggestions for

reforms in the band, and I also explained further intentions and plans

arising therefrom. At the same time I was obliged to confess that I had

lost all hope of carrying out any projects of the kind through the

general management, and must therefore recommend them to take the

initiative vigorously into their own hands. They acclaimed the idea

with enthusiastic approval. Although, as I have said before, Luettichau

left these musicians unmolested in their more or less democratic union,

yet he took care to be informed through spies of what took place at

their highly treasonable gatherings. His chief instrument was a bugler

named Lewy, who, much to the disgust of all his comrades in the

orchestra, was in particularly high favour with the director. He

consequently received precise, or rather exaggerated, accounts of my

appearance there, and thought it was now high time to let me once more

feel the weight of his authority. I was officially summoned to his

presence, and had to listen to a long and wrathful tirade which he had

been bottling up for some time about several matters. I also learned

that he knew all about the plan of theatre reform which I had laid

before the ministry. This knowledge he betrayed in a popular Dresden

phrase, which until then I had never heard; he knew very well, he said,

that in a memorandum respecting the theatre I had ‘made him look

ridiculous’ (ihm an den Laden gelegt). In answer to this I did not

refrain from telling him how I intended to act in retaliation, and when

he threatened to report me to the King and demand my dismissal, I

calmly replied that he might do as he pleased, as I was well assured

that I could rely on his Majesty’s justice to hear, not only his

charges, but also my defence. Moreover, I added, this was the only

befitting manner for me to discuss with the King the many points on

which I had to complain, not only in my own interests, but also in

those of the theatre and of art. This was not pleasant hearing for

Lüttichau, and he asked how it was possible for him to try and

co-operate with me, when I for my part had openly declared (to use his

own expression) that all labour was wasted upon him (Hopfen und Malz

verloren seien). We had at last to part with mutual shruggings of the

shoulder. My conduct seemed to trouble my former patron, and he

therefore enlisted the tact and moderation of Eduard Devrient in his

service, and asked him to use his influence with me to facilitate some

further arrangement between us. But, in spite of all his zeal, Devrient

had to admit with a smile, after we had discussed his message, that

nothing much could be done; and as I persisted in my refusal to meet

the director again in consultation respecting the service of the

theatre, he had at last to recognise that his own wisdom would have to

help him out of the difficulty.

Throughout the whole period during which I was fated to fill the post

of conductor at Dresden, the effects of this dislike on the part of the

court and the director continued to make themselves felt in everything.

The orchestral concerts, which had been organised by me in the previous

winter, were this year placed under Reissiger’s control, and at once

sank to the usual level of ordinary concerts. Public interest quickly

waned, and the undertaking could only with difficulty be kept alive. In

opera I was unable to carry out the proposed revival of the Fliegender

Holländer, for which I had found in Mitterwurzer’s maturer talent an

admirable and promising exponent. My niece Johanna, whom I had destined

for the part of Senta, did not like the role, because it offered little

opportunity for splendid costumes. She preferred ZAMPA and FAVORITA,

partly to please her new protector, my erstwhile RIENZI enthusiast,

Tichatschck, partly for the sake of THREE BRILLIANT COSTUMES which the

management had to furnish for each of these parts. In fact, these two

ringleaders of the Dresden opera of that day had formed an alliance of

rebellion against my vigorous rule in the matter of operatic

repertoire. Their opposition, to my great discomfiture, was crowned by

success when they secured the production of this FAVORITA of

Donizetti’s, the arrangement of which I had once been obliged to

undertake for Schlesinger in Paris. I had at first emphatically refused

to have anything to do with this opera, although its principal part

suited my niece’s voice admirably, even in her father’s judgment. But

now that they knew of my feud with the director, and of my voluntary

loss of influence, and finally of my evident disgrace, they thought the

opportunity ripe for compelling me to conduct this tiresome work

myself, as it happened to be my turn.

Besides this, my chief occupation at the royal theatre during this

period consisted in conducting Flotow’s opera MARTHA, which, although

it failed to attract the public, was nevertheless produced with

excessive frequency, owing to its convenient cast. On reviewing the

results of my labours in Dresden—where I had now been nearly seven

years—I could not help feeling humiliated when I considered the

powerful and energetic impetus I knew I had given in many directions to

the court theatre, and I found myself obliged to confess that, were I

now to leave Dresden, not, the smallest trace of my influence would

remain behind. From various signs I also gathered that, if ever it

should come to a trial before the King between the director and myself,

even if his Majesty were in my favour, yet out of consideration for the

courtier the verdict would go against me.

Nevertheless, on Palm Sunday of the new year, 1849, I received ample

amends. In order to ensure liberal receipts, our orchestra had again

decided to produce Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony. Every one did his utmost

to make this one of our finest performances, and the public took up the

matter with real enthusiasm. Michael Bakunin, unknown to the police,

had been present at the public rehearsal. At its close he walked

unhesitatingly up to me in the orchestra, and said in a loud voice,

that if all the music that had ever been written were lost in the

expected world-wide conflagration, we must pledge ourselves to rescue

this symphony, even at the peril of our lives. Not many weeks after

this performance it really seemed as though this world-wide

conflagration would actually be kindled in the streets of Dresden, and

that Bakunin, with whom I had meanwhile become more closely associated

through strange and unusual circumstances, would undertake the office

of chief stoker.

It was long before this date that I first made the acquaintance of this

most remarkable man. For years I had come across his name in the

newspapers, and always under extraordinary circumstances. He turned up

in Paris at a Polish gathering, but although he was a Russian, he

declared that it mattered little whether a man were a Russian or a

Pole, so long as he wanted to be a free man, and that this was all that

mattered. I heard afterwards, through George Herwegh, that he had

renounced all his sources of income as a member of an influential

Russian family, and that one day, when his entire fortune consisted of

two francs, he had given them away to a beggar on the boulevard,

because it was irksome to him to be bound by this possession to take

any thought for the morrow. I was informed of his presence in Dresden

one day by Röckel, after the latter had become a rampant republican. He

had taken the Russian into his house, and invited me to come and make

his acquaintance. Bakunin was at that time being persecuted by the

Austrian government for his share in the events which took place in

Prague in the summer of 1848, and because he was a member of the Slav

Congress which had preceded them. He had consequently sought refuge in

our city, as he did not wish to settle too far from the Bohemian

frontier. The extraordinary sensation he had created in Prague arose

from the fact that, when the Czechs sought the protection of Russia

against the dreaded Germanising policy of Austria, he conjured them to

defend themselves with fire and sword against those very Russians, and

indeed against any other people who lived under the rule of a despotism

like that of the Tsars. This superficial acquaintance with Balumin’s

aims had sufficed to change the purely national prejudices of the

Germans against him into sympathy. When I met him, therefore, under the

humble shelter of Röckel’s roof, I was immediately struck by his

singular and altogether imposing personality. He was in the full bloom

of manhood, anywhere between thirty and forty years of age. Everything

about him was colossal, and he was full of a primitive exuberance and

strength. I never gathered that he set much store by my acquaintance.

Indeed, he did not seem to care for merely intellectual men; what he

demanded was men of reckless energy. As I afterwards perceived, theory

in this case had more weight with him than purely personal sentiment;

and he talked much and expatiated freely on the matter. His general

mode of discussion was the Socratic method, and he seemed quite at his

ease when, stretched on his host’s hard sofa, he could argue

discursively with a crowd of all sorts of men on the problems of

revolution. On these occasions he invariably got the best of the

argument. It was impossible to triumph against his opinions, stated as

they were with the utmost conviction, and overstepping in every

direction even the extremest bounds of radicalism. So communicative was

he, that on the very first evening of our meeting he gave me full

details about the various stages of his development, he was a Russian

officer of high birth, but smarting under the yoke of the narrowest

martial tyranny, he had been led by a study of Rousseau’s writings to

escape to Germany under pretence of taking furlough. In Berlin he had

flung himself into the study of philosophy with all the zest of a

barbarian newly awakened to civilisation. Hegel’s philosophy was the

one which was the rage at that moment, and he soon became such an

expert in it, that he had been able to hurl that master’s most famous

disciples from the saddle of their own philosophy, in a thesis couched

in terms of the strictest Hegelian dialectic. After he had got

philosophy off his chest, as he expressed it, he proceeded to

Switzerland, where he preached communism, and thence wandered over

France and Germany back to the borderland of the Slav world, from which

quarter he looked for the regeneration of humanity, because the Slavs

had been less enervated by civilisation. His hopes in this respect were

centred in the more strongly pronounced Slav type characteristic of the

Russian peasant class. In the natural detestation of the Russian serf

for his cruel oppressor the nobleman, he believed he could trace a

substratum of simple-minded brotherly love, and that instinct which

leads animals to hate the men who hunt them. In support of this idea he

cited the childish, almost demoniac delight of the Russian people in

fire, a quality on which Rostopschin calculated in his strategic

burning of Moscow. He argued that all that was necessary to set in

motion a world-wide movement was to convince the Russian peasant, in

whom the natural goodness of oppressed human nature had preserved its

most childlike characteristics, that it was perfectly right and well

pleasing to God for them to burn their lords’ castles, with everything

in and about them. The least that could result from such a movement

would be the destruction of all those things which, rightly considered,

must appear, even to Europe’s most philosophical thinkers, the real

source of all the misery of the modern world. To set these destructive

forces in action appeared to him the only object worthy of a sensible

man’s activity. (Even while he was preaching these horrible doctrines,

Bakunin, noticing that my eyes troubled me, shielded them with his

outstretched hand from the naked light for a full hour, in spite of my

protestations.) This annihilation of all civilisation was the goal upon

which his heart was set. Meanwhile it amused him to utilise every lever

of political agitation he could lay hands on for the advancement of

this aim, and in so doing he often found cause for ironical merriment.

In his retreat he received people belonging to every shade of

revolutionary thought. Nearest to him stood those of Slav nationality,

because these, he thought, would be the most convenient and effective

weapons he could use in the uprooting of Russian despotism. In spite of

their republic and their socialism a la Proudhon, he thought nothing of

the French, and as for the Germans, he never mentioned them to me.

Democracy, republicanism, and anything else of the kind he regarded as

unworthy of serious consideration.

Every objection raised by those who had the slightest wish to

reconstruct what had been demolished, he met with overwhelming

criticism. I well remember on one occasion that a Pole, startled by his

theories, maintained that there must be an organised state to guarantee

the individual in the possession of the fields he had cultivated.

‘What!’ he answered; ‘would you carefully fence in your field to

provide a livelihood for the police again!’ This shut the mouth of the

terrified Pole. He comforted himself by saying that the creators of the

new order of things would arise of themselves, but that our sole

business in the meantime was to find the power to destroy. Was any one

of us so mad as to fancy that he would survive the desired destruction?

We ought to imagine the whole of Europe with St. Petersburg, Paris, and

London transformed into a vast rubbish-heap. How could we expect the

kindlers of such a fire to retain any consciousness after so vast a

devastation? He used to puzzle any who professed their readiness for

self-sacrifice by telling them it was not the so-called tyrants who

were so obnoxious, but the smug Philistines. As a type of these he

pointed to a Protestant parson, and declared that he would not believe

he had really reached the full stature of a man until he saw him commit

his own parsonage, with his wife and child, to the flames.

I was all the more perplexed for a while, in the face of such dreadful

ideas, by the fact that Bakunin in other respects proved a really

amiable and tender-hearted man. He was fully alive to my own anxiety

and despair with regard to the risk I ran of forever destroying my

ideals and hopes for the future of art. It is true, he declined to

receive any further instruction concerning these artistic schemes, and

would not even look at my work on the Nibelungen saga. I had just then

been inspired by a study of the Gospels to conceive the plan of a

tragedy for the ideal stage of the future, entitled Jesus of Nazareth.

Bakunin begged me to spare him any details; and when I sought to win

him over to my project by a few verbal hints, he wished me luck, but

insisted that I must at all costs make Jesus appear as a weak

character. As for the music of the piece, he advised me, amid all the

variations, to use only one set of phrases, namely: for the tenor, ‘Off

with His head!’; for the soprano, ‘Hang Him!’; and for the basso

continuo, ‘Fire! fire!’ And yet I felt more sympathetically drawn

towards this prodigy of a man when I one day induced him to hear me

play and sing the first scenes of my Fliegender Holländer. After

listening with more attention than most people gave, he exclaimed,

during a momentary pause, ‘That is stupendously fine!’ and wanted to

hear more.

As his life of permanent concealment was very dull, I occasionally

invited him to spend an evening with me. For supper my wife set before

him finely cut slices of sausage and meat, which he at once devoured

wholesale, instead of spreading them frugally on his bread in Saxon

fashion. Noticing Minna’s alarm at this, I was guilty of the weakness

of telling him how we were accustomed to consume such viands, whereupon

he reassured me with a laugh, saying that it was quite enough, only he

would like to eat what was set before him in his own way. I was

similarly astonished at the manner in which he drank wine from our

ordinary-sized small glasses. As a matter of fact he detested wine,

which only satisfied his craving for alcoholic stimulants in such

paltry, prolonged, and subdivided doses; whereas a stiff glass of

brandy, swallowed at a gulp, at once produced the same result, which,

after all, was only temporarily attained. Above all, he scorned the

sentiment which seeks to prolong enjoyment by moderation, arguing that

a true man should only strive to still the cravings of nature, and that

the only real pleasure in life worthy of a man was love.

These and other similar little characteristics showed clearly that in

this remarkable man the purest impulses of an ideal humanity conflicted

strangely with a savagery entirely inimical to all civilisation, so

that my feelings during my intercourse with him fluctuated between

involuntary horror and irresistible attraction. I frequently called for

him to share my lonely wanderings. This he gladly did, not only for the

sake of necessary bodily exercise, but also because he could do so in

this part of the world without fear of meeting his pursuers. My

attempts during our conversations to instruct him more fully regarding

my artistic aims remained quite unavailing as long as we were unable to

quit the field of mere discussion. All these things seemed to him

premature. He refused to admit that out of the very needs of the evil

present all laws for the future would have to be evolved, and that

these, moreover, must be moulded upon quite different ideas of social

culture. Seeing that he continued to urge destruction, and again

destruction, I had at last to inquire how my wonderful friend proposed

to set this work of destruction in operation. It then soon became

clear, as I had suspected it would, and as the event soon proved, that

with this man of boundless activity everything rested upon the most

impossible hypotheses. Doubtless I, with my hopes of a future artistic

remodelling of human society, appeared to him to be floating in the

barren air; yet it soon became obvious to me that his assumptions as to

the unavoidable demolition of all the institutions of culture were at

least equally visionary. My first idea was that Bakunin was the centre

of an international conspiracy; but his practical plans seem originally

to have been restricted to a project for revolutionising Prague, where

he relied merely on a union formed among a handful of students.

Believing that the time had now come to strike a blow, he prepared

himself one evening to go there. This proceeding was not free from

danger, and he set off under the protection of a passport made out for

an English merchant. First of all, however, with the view of adapting

himself to the most Philistine culture, he had to submit his huge beard

and bushy hair to the tender mercies of the razor and shears. As no

barber was available, Röckel had to undertake the task. A small group

of friends watched the operation, which had to be executed with a dull

razor, causing no little pain, under which none but the victim himself

remained passive. We bade farewell to Bakunin with the firm conviction

that we should never see him again alive. But in a week he was back

once more, as he had realised immediately what a distorted account he

had received as to the state of things in Prague, where all he found

ready for him was a mere handful of childish students. These admissions

made him the butt of Röckel’s good-humoured chaff, and after this he

won the reputation among us of being a mere revolutionary, who was

content with theoretical conspiracy. Very similar to his expectations

from the Prague students were his presumptions with regard to the

Russian people. These also afterwards proved to be entirely groundless,

and based merely on gratuitous assumptions drawn from the supposed

nature of things. I consequently found myself driven to explain the

universal belief in the terrible dangerousness of this man by his

theoretical views, as expressed here and elsewhere, and not as arising

from any actual experience of his practical activity. But I was soon to

become almost an eye-witness of the fact that his personal conduct was

never for a moment swayed by prudence, such as one is accustomed to

meet in those whose theories are not seriously meant. This was shortly

to be proved in the momentous insurrection of May, 1849.

The winter of this year, up to the spring of 1849, passed in a

many-sided development of my position and temper, as I have described

them, that is to say, in a sort of dull agitation. My latest artistic

occupation had been the five-act drama, Jesus of Nazareth, just

mentioned. Henceforth I lingered on in a state of brooding instability,

full of expectation, yet without any definite wish. I felt fully

convinced that my activity in Dresden, as an artist, had come to an

end, and I was only waiting for the pressure of circumstances to shake

myself free. On the other hand, the whole political situation, both in

Saxony and the rest of Germany, tended inevitably towards a

catastrophe. Day by day this drew nearer, and I flattered myself into

regarding my own personal fate as interwoven with this universal

unrest. Now that the powers of reaction were everywhere more and more

openly bracing themselves for conflict, the final decisive struggle

seemed indeed close at hand. My feelings of partisanship were not

sufficiently passionate to make me desire to take any active share in

these conflicts. I was merely conscious of an impulse to give myself up

recklessly to the stream of events, no matter whither it might lead.

Just at this moment, however, an entirely new influence forced itself

in a most strange fashion into my fortunes, and was at first greeted by

me with a smile of scepticism. Liszt wrote announcing an early

production in Weimar of my Tannhäuser under his own conductorship—the

first that had taken place outside Dresden—and he added with great

modesty that this was merely a fulfilment of his own personal desire.

In order to ensure success he had sent a special invitation to

Tichatschek to be his guest for the two first performances. When the

latter returned he said that the production had, on the whole, been a

success, which surprised me very much. I received a gold snuff-box from

the Grand Duke as a keepsake, which I continued to use until the year

1864. All this was new and strange to me, and I was still inclined to

regard this otherwise agreeable occurrence as a fleeting episode, due

to the friendly feeling of a great artist. ‘What does this mean for

me?’ I asked myself. ‘Has it come too early or too late?’ But a very

cordial letter from Liszt induced me to visit Weimar for a few days

later on, for a third performance of Tannhausar, which was to be

carried out entirely by native talent, with a view to the permanent

addition of this opera to the repertoire. For this purpose I obtained

leave of absence from my management for the second week in May.

Only a few days elapsed before the execution of this little plan; but

they were destined to be momentous ones. On the 1st of May the Chambers

were dissolved by the new Beust ministry, which the King had charged

with carrying out his proposed reactionary policy. This event imposed

upon me the friendly task of caring for Röckel and his family. Hitherto

his position as a deputy had shielded him from the danger of criminal

prosecution; but as soon as the Chambers were dissolved this protection

was withdrawn, and he had to escape by flight from being arrested

again. As I could do little to help him in this matter, I promised at

least to provide for the continued publication of his popular

Volksblatt, mainly because the proceeds from this would support his

family. Scarcely was Röckel safely across the Bohemian frontier, while

I was still toiling at great inconvenience to myself in the printer’s

office, in order to provide material for an issue of his paper, when

the long-expected storm burst over Dresden. Emergency deputations,

nightly mob demonstrations, stormy meetings of the various unions, and

all the other signs that precede a swift decision in the streets,

manifested themselves. On the 3rd May the demeanour of the crowds

moving in our thoroughfares plainly showed that this consummation would

soon be reached, as was undoubtedly desired. Each local deputation

which petitioned for the recognition of the German constitution, which

was the universal cry, was refused an audience by the government, and

this with a peremptoriness which at last became startling. I was

present one afternoon at a committee meeting of the Vaterlands-Verein,

although merely as a representative of Röckel’s Volksblatt, for whose

continuance, both from economic as well as humane motives, I felt

pledged. Here I was at once absorbed in watching the conduct and

demeanour of the men whom popular favour had raised to the leadership

of such unions. It was quite evident that events had passed beyond the

control of these persons; more particularly were they utterly at a loss

as to how to deal with that peculiar terrorism exerted by the lower

classes which is always so ready to react upon the representatives of

democratic theories. On every side I heard a medley of wild proposals

and hesitating responses. One of the chief subjects under debate was

the necessity of preparing for defence. Arms, and how to procure them,

were eagerly discussed, but all in the midst of great disorder; and

when at last they discovered that it was time to break up, the only

impression I received was one of the wildest confusion. I loft the hall

with a young painter named Kaufmann, from whose hand I had previously

seen a series of cartoons in the Dresden Art Exhibition, illustrating

‘The History of the Mind.’ One day I had seen the King of Saxony

standing before one of these, representing the torture of a heretic

under the Spanish Inquisition, and observed him turn away with a

disapproving shake of the head from so abstruse a subject. I was on my

way home, deep in conversation with this man, whose pale face and

troubled look betrayed that he foresaw the disaster that was imminent,

when, just as we reached the Postplatz, near the fountain erected from

Semper’s design, the clang of bells from the neighbouring tower of St.

Ann’s Church suddenly sounded the tocsin of revolt. With a terrified

cry, ‘Good God, it has begun!’ my companion vanished from my side. He

wrote to me—afterwards to say that he was living as a fugitive in

Berne, but I never saw his face again.

The clang of this bell, so close at hand, made a profound impression

upon me also. It was a very sunny afternoon, and I at once noticed the

same phenomenon which Goethe describes in his attempt to depict his own

sensations during the bombardment of Valmy. The whole square looked as

though it were illuminated by a dark yellow, almost brown, light, such

as I had once before seen in Magdeburg during an eclipse of the sun. My

most pronounced sensation beyond this was one of great, almost

extravagant, satisfaction. I felt a sudden strange longing to play with

something hitherto regarded as dangerous and important. My first idea,

suggested probably by the vicinity of the square, was to inquire at

Tichatschek’s house for the gun which, as an enthusiastic Sunday

sportsman, he was accustomed to use. I only found his wife at home, as

he was away on a holiday tour. Her evident terror as to what was going

to happen provoked me to uncontrollable laughter. I advised her to

lodge her husband’s gun in a place of safety, by handing it to the

committee of the Vaterlands-Verein in return for a receipt, as it might

otherwise soon be requisitioned by the mob. I have since learned that

my eccentric behaviour on this occasion, was afterwards reckoned

against me as a serious crime. I then returned to the streets, to see

whether anything beyond a ringing of bells and a yellowish eclipse of

the sun might be going on in the town, I first made my way to the Old

Market-place, where I noticed a group of men gathered round a

vociferous orator. It was also an agreeable surprise to me to see

Schroder-Devrient descending at the door of a hotel. She had just

arrived from Merlin, and was keenly excited by the news which had

reached her, that the populace had already been fired upon. As she had

only recently seen an abortive insurrection crushed by arms in Berlin,

she was indignant to find the same things happening in her ‘peaceful

Dresden’ as she termed it.

When she turned to me from the stolid crowd, which had complacently

been listening to her passionate outpourings, she seemed relieved at

finding some one to whom she could appeal to oppose these horrible

proceedings with all his might. I met her on another occasion at the

house of my old friend Heine, where she had taken refuge. When she

noticed my indifference she again adjured me to use every possible

effort to prevent the senseless, suicidal conflict. I heard afterwards

that a charge of high treason on account of sedition had been brought

against Schroder-Devrient by reason of her conduct in regard to this

matter. She had to prove her innocence in a court of law, so as to

establish beyond dispute her claim to the pension which she had been

promised by contract for her many years’ service in Dresden as an

opera-singer.

On the 3rd of May I betook myself direct to that quarter of the town

where I heard unpleasant rumours of a sanguinary conflict having taken

place. I afterwards learned that the actual cause of the dispute

between the civil and military power had arisen when the watch had been

changed in front of the Arsenal. At that moment the mob, under a bold

leader, had seized the opportunity to take forcible possession of the

armoury. A display of military force was made, and the crowd was fired

upon by a few cannon loaded with grape-shot. As I approached the scene

of operations through the Rampische Gasse, I met a company of the

Dresden Communal Guards, who, although they were quite innocent, had

apparently been exposed to this fire. I noticed that one of the citizen

guards, leaning heavily on the arm of a comrade, was trying to hurry

along, in spite of the fact that his right leg seemed to be dragging

helplessly behind him. Some of the crowd, seeing the blood on the

pavement behind him, shouted ‘He is bleeding.’ In the midst of this

excitement I suddenly became conscious of the cry raised on all sides:

‘To the barricades! to the barricades!’ Driven by a mechanical impulse

I followed the stream of people, which moved once more in the direction

of the Town Hall in the Old Market-place. Amid the terrific tumult I

particularly noticed a significant group stretching right across the

street, and striding along the Rosmaringasse. It reminded me, though

the simile was rather exaggerated, of the crowd that had once stood at

the doors of the theatre and demanded free entrance to Rienzi; among

them was a hunchback, who at once suggested Goethe’s Vansen in Egmont,

and as the revolutionary cry rose about his ears, I saw him rub his

hands together in great glee over the long-desired ecstasy of revolt

which he had realised at last.

I recollect quite clearly that from that moment I was attracted by

surprise and interest in the drama, without feeling any desire to join

the ranks of the combatants. However, the agitation caused by my

sympathy as a mere spectator increased with every step I felt impelled

to take. I was able to press right into the rooms of the town council,

escaping notice in the tumultuous crowd, and it seemed to me as if the

officials were guilty of collusion with the mob. I made my way

unobserved into the council-chamber; what I saw there was utter

disorder and confusion. When night fell I wandered slowly through the

hastily made barricades, consisting chiefly of market stalls, back to

my house in the distant Friedrichstrasse, and next morning I again

watched these amazing proceedings with sympathetic interest.

On Thursday, 4th May, I could see that the Town Hall was gradually

becoming the undoubted centre of the revolution. That section of the

people who had hoped for a peaceful understanding with the monarch was

thrown into the utmost consternation by the news that the King and his

whole court, acting on the advice of his minister Beust, had left the

palace, and had gone by ship down the Elbe to the fortress of

Konigstein. In those circumstances the town council saw they were no

longer able to face the situation, and thereupon took part in summoning

those members of the Saxon Chamber who were still in Dresden. These

latter now assembled in the Town Hall to decide what steps should be

taken for the protection of the state. A deputation was sent to the

ministry, but returned with the report that they were nowhere to be

found. At the same moment news arrived from all sides that, in

accordance with a previous compact, the King of Prussia’s troops would

advance to occupy Dresden. A general outcry immediately arose for

measures to be adopted to prevent this incursion of foreign troops.

Simultaneously with this, came the intelligence of the national

uprising in Wurtemberg, where the troops themselves had frustrated the

intentions of the government by their declaration of fidelity to the

parliament, and the ministry had been compelled against their will to

acknowledge the Pan-German Constitution. The opinion of our

politicians, who were assembled in consultation, was that the matter

might still be settled by peaceful means, if it were possible to induce

the Saxon troops to take up a similar attitude, as by this means the

King would at least be placed under the wholesome necessity of offering

patriotic resistance to the Prussian occupation of his country.

Everything seemed to depend on making the Saxon battalions in Dresden

understand the paramount importance of their action. As this seemed to

me the only hope of an honourable peace in this senseless chaos, I

confess that, on this one occasion, I did allow myself to be led astray

so far as to organise a demonstration which, however, proved futile.

I induced the printer of Röckel’s Volksblatt, which was for the moment

at a standstill, to employ all the type he would have used for his next

number, in printing in huge characters on strips of paper the words:

Seid Ihr mit uns gegen fremde Truppen? (‘Are you on our side against

the foreign troops?’). Placards bearing these words were fixed on those

barricades which it was thought would be the first to be assaulted, and

were intended to bring the Saxon troops to a halt if they were

commanded to attack the revolutionaries. Of course no one took any

notice of these placards except intending informers. On that day

nothing but confused negotiations and wild excitement took place which

threw no light on the situation. The Old Town of Dresden, with its

barricades, was an interesting enough sight for the spectators. I

looked on with amazement and disgust, but my attention was suddenly

distracted by seeing Bakunin emerge from his hiding-place and wander

among the barricades in a black frockcoat. But I was very much mistaken

in thinking he would be pleased with what he saw; he recognised the

childish inefficiency of all the measures that had been taken for

defence, and declared that the only satisfaction he could feel in the

state of affairs was that he need not trouble about the police, but

could calmly consider the question of going elsewhere, as he found no

inducement to take part in an insurrection conducted in such a slovenly

fashion. While he walked about, smoking his cigar, and making fun of

the naivete of the Dresden revolution, I watched the Communal Guards

assembling under arms in front of the Town Hall at the summons of their

commandant. From the ranks of its most popular corps, the

Schützen-Compagnie, I was accosted by Rietschel, who was most anxious

about the nature of the rising, and also by Semper. Rietschel, who

seemed to think I was better informed of the facts than he was, assured

me that he felt his position was a very difficult one. He said the

select company to which he belonged was very democratic, and as his

professorship at the Fine Arts Academy placed him in a peculiar

position, he did not know how to reconcile the sentiments he shared

with his company with his duty as a citizen. The word ‘citizen’ amused

me; I glanced sharply at Semper and repeated the word ‘citizen.’ Semper

responded with a peculiar smile, and turned away without further

comment.

The next day (Friday the 5th of May), when I again took my place as a

passionately interested spectator of the proceedings at the Town Hall,

events took a decisive turn. The remnant of the leaders of the Saxon

people there assembled thought it advisable to constitute themselves

into a provisional government, as there was no Saxon government in

existence with which negotiations could be conducted. Professor Kochly,

who was an eloquent speaker, was chosen to proclaim the new

administration. He performed this solemn ceremony from the balcony of

the Town Hall, facing the faithful remnant of the Communal Guards and

the not very numerous crowd. At the same time the legal existence of

the Pan-German Constitution was proclaimed, and allegiance to it was

sworn by the armed forces of the nation. I recollect that these

proceedings did not seem to me imposing, and Bakunin’s reiterated

opinion about their triviality gradually became more comprehensible.

Even from a technical point of view these reflections were justified

when, to my great amusement and surprise, Semper, in the full uniform

of a citizen guard, with a hat bedecked with the national colours,

asked for me at the Town Hall, and informed me of the extremely faulty

construction of the barricades in the Wild Strufergasse and the

neighbouring Brudergasse. To pacify his artistic conscience as an

engineer I directed him to the office of the ‘Military Commission for

the Defence.’ He followed my advice with conscientious satisfaction;

possibly he obtained the necessary authorisation to give instructions

for the building of suitable works of defence at that neglected point.

After that I never saw him again in Dresden; but I presume that he

carried out the strategic works entrusted to him by that committee with

all the conscientiousness of a Michael Angelo or a Leonardo da Vinci.

The rest of the day passed in continuous negotiations over the truce

which, by arrangement with the Saxon troops, was to last until noon of

the next day. In this business I noticed the very pronounced activity

of a former college friend, Marschall von Bieberstein, a lawyer who, in

his capacity as senior officer of the Dresden Communal Guard,

distinguished himself by his boundless zeal amid the shouts of a mighty

band of fellow-orators. On that day a certain Heinz, formerly a Greek

colonel, was placed in command of the armed forces. These proceedings

did not seem at all satisfactory to Bakunin, who put in an occasional

appearance. While the provisional government placed all its hopes on

finding a peaceful settlement of the conflict by moral persuasion, he,

on the contrary, with his clear vision foresaw a well-planned military

attack by the Prussians, and thought it could only be met by good

strategic measures. He therefore urgently pressed for the acquisition

of some experienced Polish officers who happened to be in Dresden, as

the Saxon revolutionaries appeared to be absolutely lacking in military

tactics. Everybody was afraid to take this course; on the other hand,

great expectations were entertained from negotiations with the

Frankfort States Assembly, which was on its last legs. Everything was

to be done as far as possible in legal form. The time passed pleasantly

enough. Elegant ladies with their cavaliers promenaded the barricaded

streets during those beautiful spring evenings. It seemed to be little

more than an entertaining drama. The unaccustomed aspect of things even

afforded me genuine pleasure, combined with a feeling that the whole

thing was not quite serious, and that a friendly proclamation from the

government would put an end to it. So I strolled comfortably home

through the numerous barricades at a late hour, thinking as I went of

the material for a drama, Achilleus, with which I had been occupied for

some time.

At home I found my two nieces, Clara and Ottilie Brockhaus, the

daughters of my sister Louisa. They had been living for a year with a

governess in Dresden, and their weekly visits and contagious good

spirits delighted me. Every one was in a high state of glee about the

revolution; they all heartily approved of the barricades, and felt no

scruples about desiring victory for their defenders. Protected by the

truce, this state of mind remained undisturbed the whole of Friday (5th

May). From all parts came news which led us to believe in a universal

uprising throughout Germany. Baden and the Palatinate were in the

throes of a revolt on behalf of the whole of Germany. Similar rumours

came in from free towns like Breslau. In Leipzig, volunteer student

corps had mustered contingents for Dresden, which arrived amid the

exultation of the populace. A fully equipped defence department was

organised at the Town Hall, and young Heine, disappointed like myself

in his hopes of the performance of Lohengrin, had also joined this

body. Vigorous promises of support came from the Saxon Erzgebirge, as

well as announcements that armed contingents were forthcoming. Every

one thought, therefore, that if only the Old Town were kept well

barricaded, it could safely defy the threat of foreign occupation.

Early on Saturday, 6th May, it was obvious that the situation was

becoming more serious. Prussian troops had marched into the New Town,

and the Saxon troops, which it had not been considered advisable to use

for an attack, were kept loyal to the flag. The truce expired at noon,

and the troops, supported by several guns, at once opened the attack on

one, of the principal positions held by the people on the Neumarkt.

So far I had entertained no other conviction than that the matter would

be decided in the most summary fashion as soon as it came to an actual

conflict, for there was no evidence in the state of my own feelings

(or, indeed, in what I was able to gather independently of them) of

that passionate seriousness of purpose, without which tests as severe

as this have never been successfully withstood. It was irritating to

me, while I heard the sharp rattle of fire, to be unable to gather

anything of what was going on, and I thought by climbing the Kreuz

tower I might get a good view. Even from this elevation I could not see

anything clearly, but I gathered enough to satisfy myself that after an

hour of heavy firing the advance artillery of the Prussian troops had

retired, and had at last been completely silenced, their withdrawal

being signalled by a loud shout of jubilation from the populace.

Apparently the first attack had exhausted itself; and now my interest

in what was going on began to assume a more and more vivid hue. To

obtain information in greater detail I hurried back to the Town Hall. I

could extract nothing, however, from the boundless confusion which I

met, until at last I came upon Bakunin in the midst of the main group

of speakers. He was able to give me an extraordinarily accurate account

of what had happened. Information had reached headquarters from a

barricade in the Neumarkt where the attack was most serious, that

everything had been in a state of confusion there before the onslaught

of the troops; thereupon my friend Marschall von Bieberstein, together

with Leo von Zichlinsky, who were officers in the citizen corps, had

called up some volunteers and conducted them to the place of danger.

Kreis-Amtmann Heubner of Freiberg, without a weapon to defend himself,

and with bared head, jumped immediately on to the top of the barricade,

which had just been abandoned by all its defenders. He was the sole

member of the provisional government to remain on the spot, the

leaders, Todt and Tschirner, having disappeared at the first sign of a

panic. Heubner turned round to exhort the volunteers to advance,

addressing them in stirring words. His success was complete, the

barricade was taken again, and a fire, as unexpected as it was fierce,

was directed upon the troops, which, as I myself saw, were forced to

retire. Bakunin had been in close touch with this action, he had

followed the volunteers, and he now explained to me that however narrow

might be the political views of Heubner (he belonged to the moderate

Left of the Saxon Chamber), he was a man of noble character, at whose

service he had immediately placed his own life.

Bakunin had only needed this example to determine his own line of

conduct; he had decided to risk his neck in the attempt and to ask no

further questions. Heubner too was now bound to recognise the necessity

for extreme measures, and no longer recoiled from any proposal on the

part of Bakunin which was directed to this end. The military advice of

experienced Polish officers was brought to bear on the commandant,

whose incapacity had not been slow to reveal itself; Bakunin, who

openly confessed that he understood nothing of pure strategy, never

moved from the Town Hall, but remained at Heubner’s side, giving advice

and information in every direction with wonderful sangfroid. For the

rest of the day the battle confined itself to skirmishes by

sharpshooters from the various positions. I was itching to climb the

Kreuz tower again, so as to get the widest possible survey over the

whole field of action. In order to reach this tower from the Town Hall,

one had to pass through a space which was under a cross-fire of

rifle-shots from the troops posted in the royal palace. At a moment

when this square was quite deserted, I yielded to my daring impulse,

and crossed it on my way to the Kreuz tower at a slow pace, remembering

that in such circumstances the young soldier is advised never to hurry,

because by so doing he may draw the shot upon himself. On reaching this

post of vantage I found several people who had gathered there, some of

them driven by a curiosity like my own, others in obedience to an order

from the headquarters of the revolutionaries to reconnoitre the enemy’s

movements. Amongst them I made the acquaintance of a schoolmaster

called Berthold, a man of quiet and gentle disposition, but full of

conviction and determination. I lost myself in an earnest philosophical

discussion with him which extended to the widest spheres of religion.

At the same time he showed a homely anxiety to protect us from the

cone-shaped bullets of the Prussian sharpshooters by placing us

ingeniously behind a barricade consisting of one of the straw

mattresses which he had cajoled out of the warder. The Prussian

sharpshooters were posted on the distant tower of the Frauenkirche, and

had chosen the height occupied by us as their target. At nightfall I

found it impossible to make up my mind to go home and leave my

interesting place of refuge, so I persuaded the warder to send a

subordinate to Friedrichstadt with a few lines to my wife, and with

instructions to ask her to let me have some necessary provisions. Thus

I spent one of the most extraordinary nights of my life, taking turns

with Berthold to keep watch and sleep, close beneath the great bell

with its terrible groaning clang, and with the accompaniment of the

continuous rattle of the Prussian shot as it beat against the tower

walls.

Sunday (the 7th of May) was one of the most beautiful days in the year.

I was awakened by the song of a nightingale, which rose to our ears

from the Schütze garden close by. A sacred calm and peacefulness lay

over the town and the wide suburbs of Dresden, which were visible from

my point of vantage. Towards sunrise a mist settled upon the outskirts,

and suddenly through its folds we could hear the music of the

Marseillaise making its way clearly and distinctly from the district of

the Tharanderstrasse. As the sound drew nearer and nearer, the mist

dispersed, and the glow of the rising sun spread a glittering light

upon the weapons of a long column which was winding its way towards the

town. It was impossible not to feel deeply impressed at the sight of

this continuous procession. Suddenly a perception of that element which

I had so long missed in the German people was borne in upon me in all

its essential freshness and vital colour. The fact that until this

moment I had been obliged to resign myself to its absence, had

contributed not a little to the feelings by which I had been swayed.

Here I beheld some thousand men from the Erzgebirge, mostly miners,

well armed and organised, who had rallied to the defence of Dresden.

Soon we saw them march up the Altmarkt opposite the Town Hall, and

after receiving a joyful welcome, bivouac there to recover from their

journey. Reinforcements continued to pour in the whole day long, and

the heroic achievement of the previous day now received its reward in

the shape of a universal elevation of spirits. A change seemed to have

been made in the plan of attack by the Prussian troops. This could be

gathered from the fact that numerous simultaneous attacks, but of a

less concentrated type, were made upon various positions. The troops

which had come to reinforce us brought with them four small cannon, the

property of a certain Herr Thade von Burgk, whose acquaintance I had

made before on the occasion of the anniversary of the founding of the

Dresden Choral Society, when he had made a speech which was well

intentioned but wearisome to the point of being ludicrous. The

recollection of this speech returned to me with peculiar irony, now

that his cannon were being fired from the barricade upon the enemy. I

felt a still deeper impression, however, when, towards eleven o’clock,

I saw the old Opera House, in which a few weeks ago I had conducted the

last performance of the Ninth Symphony, burst into flames. As I have

had occasion to mention before, the danger from fire to which this

building was exposed, full as it was with wood and all kind of textile

fabric, and originally built only for a temporary purpose, had always

been a subject of terror and apprehension to those who visited it.

I was told that the Opera House had been set alight on strategical

grounds, in order to face a dangerous attack on this exposed side, and

also to protect the famous ‘Semper’ barricade from an overpowering

surprise. From this I concluded that reasons of this kind act as far

more powerful motives in the world than aesthetic considerations. For a

long time men of taste had vainly cried aloud for abolition of this

ugly building which was such an eyesore by the side of the elegant

proportions of the Zwinger Gallery in its neighbourhood. In a few

moments the Opera House (which as regards size was, it is true, an

imposing edifice), together with its highly inflammable contents, was a

vast sea of flames. When this reached the metal roofs of the

neighbouring wings of the Zwinger, and enveloped them in wonderful

bluish waves of fire, the first expression of regret made itself

audible amongst the spectators. What a disaster! Some thought that the

Natural History collection was in danger; others maintained that it was

the Armoury, upon which a citizen soldier retorted that if such were

the case, it would be a very good job if the ‘stuffed noblemen’ were

burnt to cinders. But it appeared that a keen sense of the value of art

knew how to curb the fire’s lust for further dominion, and, as a matter

of fact, it did but little damage in that quarter. Finally our post of

observation, which until now had remained comparatively quiet, was

filled itself with swarms and swarms of armed men, who had been ordered

thither to defend the approach from the church to the Altmarkt, upon

which an attack was feared from the side of the ill-secured Kreuzgasse.

Unarmed men were now in the way; moreover, I had received a message

from my wife summoning me home after the long and terrible anxiety she

had suffered.

At last, after meeting with innumerable obstacles and overcoming a host

of difficulties, I succeeded, by means of all sorts of circuitous

routes, in reaching my remote suburb, from which I was cut off by the

fortified portions of the town, and especially by a cannonade directed

from the Zwinger. My lodgings were full to overflowing with excited

women who had collected round Minna; among them the panic-stricken wife

of Röckel, who suspected her husband of being in the very thick of the

fight, as she thought that on the receipt of the news that Dresden had

risen he would probably have returned. As a matter of fact, I had heard

a rumour that Röckel had arrived on this very day, but as yet I had not

obtained a glimpse of him. My young nieces helped once more to raise my

spirits. The firing had put them into a high state of glee, which to

some extent infected my wife, as soon as she was reassured as to my

personal safety. All of them were furious with the sculptor Hänel, who

had never ceased insisting upon the expedience of bolting the house to

prevent an entry of the revolutionaries. All the women without

exception were joking about his abject terror at the sight of some men

armed with scythes who had appeared in the street In this way Sunday

passed like a sort of family jollification.

On the following morning (Monday, 8th May) I tried again to get

information as to the state of affairs by forcing my way to the Town

Hall from my house, which was cut off from the place of action. As in

the course of my journey I was making my way over a barricade near St.

Ann’s Church, one of the Communal Guard shouted out to me, ‘Hullo,

conductor, your der Freude schöner Götterfunken[15] has indeed set fire

to things. The rotten building is rased to the ground.’ Obviously the

man was an enthusiastic member of the audience at my last performance

of the Ninth Symphony. Coming upon me so unexpectedly, this pathetic

greeting filled me with a curious sense of strength and freedom. A

little further on, in a lonely alley in the suburb of Plauen, I fell in

with the musician Hiebendahl, the first oboist in the royal orchestra,

and a man who still enjoyed a very high reputation; he was in the

uniform of the Communal Guards, but carried no gun, and was chatting

with a citizen in a similar costume. As soon as he saw me, he felt he

must immediately make an appeal to me to use my influence against

Röckel, who, accompanied by ordnance officers of the revolutionary

party, was instituting a search for guns in this quarter. As soon as he

realised that I was making sympathetic inquiries about Röckel, he drew

back frightened, and said to me in tones of the deepest anxiety: ‘But,

conductor, have you no thought for your position, and what you may lose

by exposing yourself in this fashion?’ This remark had the most drastic

effect upon me; I burst into a loud laugh, and told him that my

position was not worth a thought one way or the other. This indeed was

the expression of my real feelings, which had long been suppressed, and

now broke out into almost jubilant utterance. At that moment I caught

sight of Röckel, with two men of the citizen army who were carrying

some guns, making his way towards me. He gave me a most friendly

greeting, but turned at once to Hiebendahl and his companion and asked

him why he was idling about here in uniform instead of being at his

post. When Hiebendahl made the excuse that his gun had been

requisitioned, Röckel cried out to him, ‘You’re a fine lot of fellows!’

and went away laughing. He gave me a brief account as we proceeded of

what had happened to him since I had lost sight of him, and thus spared

me the obligation of giving him a report of his Volksblatt. We were

interrupted by an imposing troop of well-armed young students of the

gymnasium who had just entered the city and wished to have a safe

conduct to their place of muster. The sight of these serried ranks of

youthful figures, numbering several hundreds, who were stepping bravely

to their duty, did not fail to make the most elevating impression upon

me. Röckel undertook to accompany them over the barricade in safety to

the mastering place in front of the Town Hall. He took the opportunity

of lamenting the utter absence of true spirit which he had hitherto

encountered in those in command. He had proposed, in case of extremity,

to defend the most seriously threatened barricades by tiring them with

pitch brands; at the mere word the provisional government had fallen

into a veritable state of panic. I let him go his way in order that I

might enjoy the privilege of a solitary person and reach the Town Hall

by a short cut, and it was not until thirteen years later that I again

set eyes upon him.

[15] These words refer to the opening of the Ninth Symphony chorus:

‘Freude, Freude, Freude, schöner götterfunken Tochter aus

Elysium’—(Praise her, praise oh praise Joy, the god-descended daughter

of Elysium.) English version by Natalia Macfarren.—Editor.

In the Town Hall I learned from Bakunin that the provisional government

had passed a resolution, on his advice, to abandon the position in

Dresden, which had been entirely neglected from the beginning, and was

consequently quite untenable for any length of time. This resolution

proposed an armed retreat to the Erzgebirge, where it would be possible

to concentrate the reinforcements pouring in from all sides, especially

from Thuringia, in such strength, that the advantageous position could

be used to inaugurate a German civil war that would sound no hesitating

note at its outset. To persist in defending isolated barricaded streets

in Dresden could, on the other hand, lend little but the character of

an urban riot to the contest, although it was pursued with the highest

courage. I must confess that this idea seemed to me magnificent and

full of meaning. Up to this moment I had been moved only by a feeling

of sympathy for a method of procedure entered upon at first with almost

ironical incredulity, and then pursued with the vigour of surprise.

Now, however, all that had before seemed incomprehensible, unfolded

itself before my vision in the form of a great and hopeful solution.

Without either feeling that I was in any way being compelled, or that

it was my vocation to get some part or function allotted to me in these

events, I now definitely abandoned all consideration for my personal

situation, and determined to surrender myself to the stream of

developments which flowed in the direction towards which my feelings

had driven me with a delight that was full of despair. Still, I did not

wish to leave my wife helpless in Dresden, and I rapidly devised a

means of drawing her into the path which I had chosen, without

immediately informing her of what my resolve meant. During my hasty

return to Friedrichstadt I recognised that this portion of the town had

been almost entirely cut off from the inner city by the occupation of

the Prussian troops; I saw in my mind’s eye our own suburb occupied,

and the consequences of a state of military siege in their most

repulsive light. It was an easy job to persuade Minna to accompany me

on a visit, by way of the Tharanderstrasse, which was still free, to

Chemnitz, where my married sister Clara lived. It was only a matter of

a moment for her to arrange her household orders, and she promised to

follow me to the next village in an hour with the parrot. I went on in

advance with my little dog Peps, in order to hire a carriage in which

to proceed on our journey to Chemnitz. It was a smiling spring morning

when I traversed for the last time the paths I had so often trod on my

lonely walks, with the knowledge that I should never wander along them

again. While the larks were soaring to dizzy heights above my head, and

singing in the furrows of the fields, the light and heavy artillery did

not cease to thunder down the streets of Dresden. The noise of this

shooting, which had continued uninterruptedly for several days, had

hammered itself so indelibly upon my nerves, that it continued to

re-echo for a long time in my brain; just as the motion of the ship

which took me to London had made me stagger for some time afterwards.

Accompanied by this terrible music, I threw my parting greeting to the

towers of the city that lay behind me, and said to myself with a smile,

that if, seven years ago, my entry had taken place under thoroughly

obscure auspices, at all events my exit was conducted with some show of

pomp and ceremony.

When at last I found myself with Minna in a one-horse carriage on the

way to the Erzgebirge, we frequently met armed reinforcements on their

way to Dresden. The sight of them always kindled an involuntary joy in

us; even my wife could not refrain from addressing words of

encouragement to the men; at present it seemed not a single barricade

had been lost. On the other hand, a gloomy impression was made upon us

by a company of regulars which was making its way towards Dresden in

silence. We asked some of them whither they were bound; and their

answer, ‘To do their duty,’ had been obviously impressed upon them by

command. At last we reached my relations in Chemnitz. I terrified all

those near and dear to me when I declared my intention to return to

Dresden on the following day at the earliest possible hour, in order to

ascertain how things were going there. In spite of all attempts to

dissuade me, I carried out my decision, pursued by a suspicion that I

should meet the armed forces of the Dresden people on the country

highroad in the act of retreat. The nearer I approached the capital,

the stronger became the confirmation of the rumours that, as yet, there

was no thought in Dresden of surrender or withdrawal, but that, on the

contrary, the contest was proving very favourable for the national

party. All this appeared to me like one miracle after another. On this

day, Tuesday, 9th of May, I once more forced my way in a high state of

excitement over ground which had become more and more inaccessible. All

the highways had to be avoided, and it was only possible to make

progress through such houses as had been broken through. At last I

reached the Town Hall in the Altstadt, just as night was falling. A

truly terrible spectacle met my eyes, for I crossed those parts of the

town in which preparations had been made for a house-to-house fight.

The incessant groaning of big and small guns reduced to an uncanny

murmur all the other sounds that came from armed men ceaselessly crying

out to one another from barricade to barricade, and from one house to

another, which they had broken through. Pitch brands burnt here and

there, pale-faced figures lay prostrate around the watch-posts, half

dead with fatigue, and any unarmed wayfarer forcing a path for himself

was sharply challenged. Nothing, however, that I have lived through can

be compared with the impression that I received on my entry into the

chambers of the Town Hall. Here was a gloomy, and yet fairly compact

and serious mass of people; a look of unspeakable fatigue was upon all

faces; not a single voice had retained its natural tone. There was a

hoarse jumble of conversation inspired by a state of the highest

tension. The only familiar sight that survived was to be found in the

old servants of the Town Hall in their curious antiquated uniform and

three-cornered hats. These tall men, at other times an object of

considerable fear, I found engaged partly in buttering pieces of bread,

and cutting slices of ham and sausage, and partly in piling into

baskets immense stores of provisions for the messengers sent by the

defenders of the barricades for supplies. These men had turned into

veritable nursing mothers of the revolution.

As I proceeded further, I came at last upon the members of the

provisional government, among whom Todt and Tschirner, after their

first panic-stricken flight, were once more to be found gliding to and

fro, gloomy as spectres, now that they were chained to the performance

of their heavy duties. Heubner alone had preserved his full energy; but

he was a really piteous sight: a ghostly fire burned in his eyes which

had not had a wink of sleep for seven nights. He was delighted to see

me again, as he regarded my arrival as a good omen for the cause which

he was defending; while on the other hand, in the rapid succession of

events, he had come into contact with elements about which no

conclusion could shape itself to his complete satisfaction. I found

Bakunin’s outlook undisturbed, and his attitude firm and quiet. He did

not show the smallest change in his appearance, in spite of having had

no sleep during the whole time, which I afterwards heard was a fact.

With a cigar in his mouth he received me, seated on one of the

mattresses which lay distributed over the floor of the Town Hall. At

his side was a very young Pole (a Galician) named Haimberger, a

violinist whom he had once asked me to recommend to Lipinsky, in order

that he might give him lessons, as he did not want this raw and

inexperienced boy, who had become passionately attached to him, to get

drawn into the vortex of the present upheavals. Now that Haimberger had

shouldered a gun, and presented himself for service at the barricades,

however, Bakunin had greeted him none the less joyfully. He had drawn

him down to sit by his side on the couch, and every time the youth

shuddered with fear at the violent sound of the cannon-shot, he slapped

him vigorously on the back and cried out: ‘You are not in the company

of your fiddle here, my friend. What a pity you didn’t stay where you

were!’ Bakinin then gave me a short and precise account of what had

happened since I had left him on the previous morning. The retreat

which had then been decided upon soon proved unadvisable, as it would

have discouraged the numerous reinforcements which had already arrived

on that day. Moreover, the desire for fighting had been so great, and

the force of the defenders so considerable, that it had been possible

to oppose the enemy’s troops successfully so far. But as the latter had

also got large reinforcements, they again had been able to make an

effective combined attack on the strong Wildstruf barricade. The

Prussian troops had avoided fighting in the streets, choosing instead

the method of fighting from house to house by breaking through the

walls. This had made it clear that all defence by barricades had become

useless, and that the enemy would succeed slowly but surely in drawing

near the Town Hall, the seat of the provisional government. Bakunin had

now proposed that all the powder stores should be brought together in

the lower rooms of the Town Hall, and that on the approach of the enemy

it should be blown up. The town council, who were still in consultation

in a back room, had remonstrated with the greatest vehemence. Bakunin,

however, had insisted with great firmness on the execution of the

measure, but in the end had been completely outwitted by the removal of

all the powder stores. Moreover, Heubner, to whom Bakunin could refuse

nothing, had been won over to the other side. It was now decided that

as everything was ready, the retreat to the Erzgebirge, which had

originally been intended for the previous day, should be fixed for the

early morrow. Young Zichlinsky had already received orders to cover the

road to Plauen so as to make it strategically safe. When I inquired

after Röckel, Bakunin replied swiftly that he had not been seen since

the previous evening, and that he had most likely allowed himself to be

caught: he was in such a nervous state. I now gave an account of what I

had observed on my way to and from Chemnitz, describing the great

masses of reinforcements, amongst which was the communal guard of that

place, several thousands strong. In Freiberg I had met four hundred

reservists, who had come in excellent form to back the citizen army,

but could not proceed further, as they were tired out by their forced

march. It seemed obvious that this was a case in which the necessary

energy to requisition wagons had been lacking, and that if the bounds

of loyalty were transgressed in this matter, the advent of fresh forces

would be considerably promoted. I was begged to make my way back at

once, and convey the opinion of the provisional government to the

people whose acquaintance I had made. My old friend Marschall von

Bieberstein immediately proposed to accompany me. I welcomed his offer,

as he was an officer of the provisional government, and was

consequently more fitted than I was to communicate orders. This man,

who had been almost extravagant in his enthusiasm before, was now

utterly exhausted by sleeplessness, and unable to emit another word

from his hoarse throat. He now made his way with me from the Town Hall

to his house in the suburb of Plauen by the devious ways that had been

indicated to us, in order to requisition a carriage for our purpose

from a coachman he knew, and to bid farewell to his family, from whom

he assumed he would in all probability have to separate himself for

some time.

While we were waiting for the coachman we had tea and supper, talking

the while, in a fairly calm and composed manner, with the ladies of the

house. We arrived at Freiberg early the following morning, after

various adventures, and I set out forthwith to find the leaders of the

reservist contingent with whom I was already acquainted. Marschall

advised them to requisition horses and carts in the villages wherever

they could do so. When they had all set off in marching order for

Dresden, and while I was feeling impelled by my passionate interest in

the fate of that city to return to it once more, Marschall conceived

the desire to carry his commission further afield, and for this purpose

asked to be allowed to leave me. Whereupon I again turned my back on

the heights of the Erzgebirge, and was travelling by special coach in

the direction of Tharand, when I too was overcome with sleep, and was

only awakened by violent shouts and the sound of some one holding a

parley with the postillion. On opening my eyes I found, to my

astonishment, that the road was filled with armed revolutionaries

marching, not towards, but away from Dresden, and some of them were

trying to commandeer the coach to relieve their weariness on the way

back.

‘What is the matter?’ I cried. ‘Where are you going?’

‘Home,’ was the reply. ‘It is all over in Dresden. The provincial

government is close behind us in that carriage down there.’

I shot out of the coach like a dart, leaving it at the disposal of the

tired men, and hurried on, down the steeply sloping road, to meet the

ill-fated party. And there I actually found them—Heubner, Bakunin, and

Martin, the energetic post-office clerk, the two latter armed with

muskets—in a smart hired carriage from Dresden which was coming slowly

up the hill. On the box were, as I supposed, the secretaries, while as

many as possible of the weary National Guard struggled for seats

behind. I hastened to swing myself into the coach, and so came in for a

conversation which thereupon took place between the driver, who was

also the owner of the coach, and the provisional government. The man

was imploring them to spare his carriage, which, he said, was very

lightly sprung and quite unequal to carrying such a load; he begged

that the people should be told not to seat themselves behind and in

front. But Bakunin remained quite unconcerned, and elected to give me a

short account of the retreat from Dresden, which had been successfully

achieved without loss. He had had the trees in the newly planted

Maximilian Avenue felled early in the morning to form a barricade

against a possible flank attack of cavalry, and had been immensely

entertained by the lamentations of the inhabitants, who during the

process did nothing but bewail their _Scheene Beeme_.[16] All this time

our driver’s lamentations over his coach were growing more importunate.

Finally he broke into loud sobs and tears, upon which Bakunin,

regarding him with positive pleasure, called out: ‘The tears of a

Philistine are nectar for the gods.’ He would not vouchsafe him a word,

but Heubner and I found the scene tiresome, whereupon he asked me

whether we two at least should not get out, as he could not ask it of

the others. As a matter of fact, it was high time to leave the coach,

as some new contingents of revolutionaries had formed up in rank and

file all along the highway to salute the provisional government and

receive orders. Heubner strode down the line with great dignity,

acquainted the leaders with the state of affairs, and exhorted them to

keep their trust in the righteousness of the cause for which so many

had shed their blood. All were now to retire to Freiberg, there to

await further orders.

[16] Saxon corruption of _schöne Bäume_, beautiful trees.—EDITOR.

A youngish man of serious mien now stepped forward from the ranks of

the rebels to place himself under the special protection of the

provisional government. He was a certain Menzdorff, a German Catholic

priest whom I had had the advantage of meeting in Dresden. (It was he

who, in the course of a significant conversation, had first induced me

to read Feuerbach.) He had been dragged along as a prisoner and

abominably treated by the Chemnitz municipal guard on this particular

march, having originally been the instigator of a demonstration to

force that body to take up arms and march to Dresden. He owed his

freedom only to the chance meeting with other better disposed volunteer

corps. We saw this Chemnitz town guard ourselves, stationed far away on

a hill. They sent representatives to beseech Heubner to tell them how

things stood. When they had received the information required, and had

been told that the fight would be continued in a determined manner,

they invited the provisional government to quarter at Chemnitz. As soon

as they rejoined their main body we saw them wheel round and turn back.

With many similar interruptions the somewhat disorganised procession

reached Freiberg. Here some friends of Heubner’s came to meet him in

the streets with the urgent request not to plunge their native place

into the misery of desperate street-fighting by establishing the

provisional government there. Heubner made no reply to this, but

requested Bakunin and myself to accompany him into his house for a

consultation. First we had to witness the painful meeting between

Heubner and his wife; in a few words he pointed out the gravity and

importance of the task assigned to him, reminding her that it was for

Germany and the high destiny of his country that he was staking his

life.

Breakfast was then prepared, and after the meal, during which a fairly

cheerful mood prevailed, Heubner made a short speech to Bakunin,

speaking quietly but firmly. ‘My dear Bakunin,’ he said (his previous

acquaintance with Bakunin was so slight that he did not even know how

to pronounce his name), ‘before we decide anything further, I must ask

you to state clearly whether your political aim is really the Red

Republic, of which they tell me you are a partisan. Tell me frankly, so

that I may know if I can rely on your friendship in the future?’

Bakunin explained briefly that he had no scheme for any political form

of government, and would not risk his life for any of them. As for his

own far-reaching desires and hopes, they had nothing whatever to do

with the street-fighting in Dresden and all that this implied for

Germany. He had looked upon the rising in Dresden as a foolish,

ludicrous movement until he realised the effect of Heubner’s noble and

courageous example. From that moment every political consideration and

aim had been put in the background by his sympathy with this heroic

attitude, and he had immediately resolved to assist this excellent man

with all the devotion and energy of a friend. He knew, of course, that

he belonged to the so-called moderate party, of whose political future

he was not able to form an opinion, as he had not profited much by his

opportunities of studying the position of the various parties in

Germany.

Heubner declared himself satisfied by this reply, and proceeded to ask

Bakunin’s opinion of the present state of things—whether it would not

be conscientious and reasonable to dismiss the men and give up a

struggle which might be considered hopeless. In reply Bakunin insisted,

with his usual calm assurance, that whoever else threw up the sponge,

Heubner must certainly not do so. He had been the first member of the

provisional government, and it was he who had given the call to arms.

The call had been obeyed, and hundreds of lives had been sacrificed; to

scatter the people again would look as if these sacrifices had been

made to idle folly. Even if they were the only two left, they still

ought not to forsake their posts. If they went under their lives might

be forfeit, but their honour must remain unsullied, so that a similar

appeal in the future might not drive every one to despair.

This was quite enough for Heubner. He at once made out a summons for

the election of a representative assembly for Saxony, to be held at

Chemnitz. He thought that, with the assistance of the populace and of

the numerous insurgent bands who were arriving from all quarters, he

would be able to hold the town as the headquarters of a provisional

government until the general situation in Germany had become more

settled. In the midst of these discussions, Stephan Born walked into

the room to report that he had brought the armed bands right into

Freiberg, in good order and without any losses. This young man was a

compositor who had contributed greatly to Heubner’s peace of mind

during the last three days in Dresden by taking over the chief command.

His simplicity of manner made a very encouraging impression on us,

particularly when we heard his report. When, however, Heubner asked

whether he would undertake to defend Freiberg against the troops which

might be expected to attack at any moment, he declared that this was an

experienced officer’s job, and that he himself was no soldier and knew

nothing of strategy. Under these circumstances it seemed better, if

only to gain time, to fall back on the more thickly populated town of

Chemnitz. The first thing to be done, however, was to see that the

revolutionaries, who were assembled in large numbers at Freiberg, were

properly cared for, and Born went off immediately to make preliminary

arrangements. Heubner also took leave of us, and went to refresh his

tired brain by an hour’s sleep. I was left alone on the sofa with

Bakunin, who soon fell towards me, overcome by irresistible drowsiness,

and dropped the terrific weight of his head on to my shoulder. As I saw

that he would not wake if I shook off this burden, I pushed him aside

with some difficulty, and took leave both of the sleeper and of

Heubner’s house; for I wished to see for myself, as I had done for many

days past, what course these extraordinary events were taking. I

therefore went to the Town Hall, where I found the townspeople

entertaining to the best of their ability a blustering horde of excited

revolutionaries both within and without the walls. To my surprise, I

found Heubner there in the full swing of work. I thought he was asleep

at home, but the idea of leaving the people even for an hour without a

counsellor had driven away all thought of rest. He had lost no time in

superintending the organisation of a sort of commandant’s office, and

was again occupied with drafting and signing documents in the midst of

the uproar that raged on all sides. It was not long before Bakunin too

put in an appearance, principally in search of a good officer—who was

not, however, forthcoming. The commandant of a large contingent from

the Vogtland, an oldish man, raised Bakunin’s hopes by the impassioned

energy of his speeches, and he would have had him appointed

commandant-general on the spot. But it seemed as if any real decision

were impossible in that frenzy and confusion, and as the only hope of

mastering it seemed to be in reaching Chemnitz, Heubner gave the order

to march on towards that town as soon as every one had had food. Once

this was settled, I told my friends I should go on in advance of their

column to Chemnitz, where I should find them again next day; for I

longed to be quit of this chaos. I actually caught the coach, the

departure of which was fixed for that time, and obtained a seat in it.

But the revolutionaries were just marching off on the same road, and we

were told that we must wait until they had passed to avoid being caught

in the whirlpool. This meant considerable delay, and for a long while I

watched the peculiar bearing of the patriots as they marched out. I

noticed in particular a Vogtland regiment, whose marching step was

fairly orthodox, following the beat of a drummer who tried to vary the

monotony of his instrument in an artistic manner by hitting the wooden

frame alternately with the drumhead. The unpleasant rattling tone thus

produced reminded me in ghostly fashion of the rattling of the

skeletons’ bones in the dance round the gallows by night which Berlioz

had brought home to my imagination with such terrible realism in his

performance of the last movement of his Sinfonie Fantastique in Paris.

Suddenly the desire seized me to look up the friends I had left behind,

and travel to Chemnitz in their company if possible. I found they had

quitted the Town Hall, and on reaching Heubner’s house I was told that

he was asleep. I therefore went back to the coach, which, however, was

still putting off its departure, as the road was blocked with troops. I

walked nervously up and down for some time, then, losing faith in the

journey by coach, I went back again to Heubner’s house to offer myself

definitely as a travelling companion. But Heubner and Bakunin had

already left home, and I could find no traces of them. In desperation I

returned once more to the coach, and found it by this time really ready

to start. After various delays and adventures it brought me late at

night to Chemnitz, where I got out and betook myself to the nearest

inn. At five o’clock the next morning I got up (after a few hours’

sleep) and set out to find my brother-in-law Wolfram’s house, which was

about a quarter of an hour’s walk from the town. On the way I asked a

sentinel of the town guard whether he knew anything about the arrival

of the provisional government.

‘Provisional government?’ was the reply. ‘Why, it’s all up with that.’

I did not understand him, nor was I able to learn anything about the

state of things when I first reached the house of my relatives, for my

brother-in-law had been sent into the town as special constable. It was

only on his return home, lute in the afternoon, that I heard what had

taken place in one hotel at Chemnitz while I had been resting in

another inn. Heubner, Bakunin, and the man called Martin, whom I have

mentioned already, had, it seemed, arrived before me in a hackney-coach

at the gates of Chemnitz. On being asked for their names Heubner had

announced himself in a tone of authority, and had bidden the town

councillors come to him at a certain hotel. They had no sooner reached

the hotel than they all three collapsed from excessive fatigue.

Suddenly the police broke into the room and arrested them in the name

of the local government, upon which they only begged to have a few

hours’ quiet sleep, pointing out that flight was out of the question in

their present condition. I heard further that they had been removed to

Altenburg under a strong military escort. My brother-in-law was obliged

to confess that the Chemnitz municipal guard, which had been forced to

start for Dresden much against its will, and had resolved at the very

outset to place itself at the disposal of the royal forces on arriving

there, had deceived Heubner by inviting him to Chemnitz, and had lured

him into the trap. They had reached Chemnitz long before Heubner, and

had taken over the guard at the gates with the object of seeing him

arrive and of preparing for his arrest at once. My brother-in-law had

been very anxious about me too, as he had been told in furious tones by

the leaders of the town guard that I had been seen in close association

with the revolutionaries. He thought it a wonderful intervention of

Providence that I had not arrived at Chemnitz with them and gone to the

same inn, in which case their fate would certainly have been mine. The

recollection of my escape from almost certain death in duels with the

most experienced swordsmen in my student days flashed across me like a

flash of lightning. This last terrible experience made such an

impression on me that I was incapable of breathing a word in connection

with what had happened. My brother-in-law, in response to urgent

appeals—from my wife in particular, who was much concerned for my

personal safety—undertook to convey me to Altenburg in his carriage by

night. From there I continued my journey by coach to Weimar, where I

had originally planned to spend my holidays, little thinking that I

should arrive by such devious ways.

The dreamy unreality of my state of mind at this time is best explained

by the apparent seriousness with which, on meeting Liszt again, I at

once began to discuss what seemed to be the sole topic of any real

interest to him in connection with me—the forthcoming revival of

Tannhäuser at Weimar. I found it very difficult to confess to this

friend that I had not left Dresden in the regulation way for a

conductor of the royal opera. To tell the truth, I had a very hazy

conception of the relation in which I stood to the law of my country

(in the narrow sense). Had I done anything criminal in the eye of the

law or not? I found it impossible to come to any conclusion about it.

Meanwhile, alarming news of the terrible conditions in Dresden

continued to pour into Weimar. Genast, the stage manager, in

particular, aroused great excitement by spreading the report that

Röckel, who was well known at Weimar, had been guilty of arson. Liszt

must soon have gathered from my conversation, in which I did not take

the trouble to dissimulate, that I too was suspiciously connected with

these terrible events, though my attitude with regard to them misled

him for some time. For I was not by any means prepared to proclaim

myself a combatant in the recent fights, and that for reasons quite

other than would have seemed valid in the eyes of the law. My friend

was therefore encouraged in his delusion by the unpremeditated effect

of my attitude. When we met at the house of Princess Caroline of

Wittgenstein, to whom I had been introduced the year before when she

paid her flying visit to Dresden, we were able to hold stimulating

conversations on all sorts of artistic topics. One afternoon, for

instance, a lively discussion sprang up from a description I had given

of a tragedy to be entitled Jesus of Nazareth. Liszt maintained a

discreet silence after I had finished, whereas the Princess protested

vigorously against my proposal to bring such a subject on to the stage.

From the lukewarm attempt I made to support the paradoxical theories I

had put forward, I realised the state of my mind at that time. Although

it was not very evident to onlookers, I had been, and still was, shaken

to the very depths of my being by my recent experiences.

In due course an orchestral rehearsal of Tannhäuser took place, which

in various ways stimulated the artist in me afresh. Liszt’s conducting,

though mainly concerned with the musical rather than the dramatic side,

filled me for the first time with the flattering warmth of emotion

roused by the consciousness of being understood by another mind in full

sympathy with my own. At the same time I was able, in spite of my

dreamy condition, to observe critically the standard of capacity

exhibited by the singers and their chorus-master. After the rehearsal

I, together with the musical director, Stohr, and Götze the singer,

accepted Liszt’s invitation to a simple dinner, at a different inn from

the one where he lived. I thus had occasion to take alarm at a trait in

his character which was entirely new to me. After being stirred up to a

certain pitch of excitement his mood became positively alarming, and he

almost gnashed his teeth in a passion of fury directed against a

certain section of society which had also aroused my deepest

indignation. I was strongly affected by this strange experience with

this wonderful man, but I was unable to see the association of ideas

which had led to his terrible outburst. I was therefore left in a state

of amazement, while Liszt had to recover during the night from a

violent attack of nerves which his excitement had produced. Another

surprise was in store for me the next morning, when I found my friend

fully equipped for a journey to Karlsruhe—the circumstances which made

it necessary being absolutely incomprehensible to me. Liszt invited

Director Stohr and myself to accompany him as far as Eisenach. On our

way there we were stopped by Beaulieu, the Lord Chamberlain, who wished

to know whether I was prepared to be received by the Grand Duchess of

Weimar, a sister of the Emperor Nicolas, at Eisenach castle. As my

excuse on the score of unsuitable travelling costume was not admitted,

Liszt accepted in my name, and I really met with a surprisingly kind

reception that evening from the Grand Duchess, who chatted with me in

the friendliest way, and introduced me to her chamberlain with all due

ceremony. Liszt maintained afterwards that his noble patroness had been

informed that I should be wanted by the authorities in Dresden within

the next few days, and had therefore hastened to make my personal

acquaintance at once, knowing that it would compromise her too heavily

later on.

Liszt continued his journey from Eisenach, leaving me to be entertained

and looked after by Stohr and the musical director Kuhmstedt, a

diligent and skilful master of counterpoint with whom I paid my first

visit to the Wartburg, which had not then been restored. I was filled

with strange musings as to my fate when I visited this castle. Here I

was actually on the point of entering, for the first time, the building

which was so full of meaning for me; here, too, I had to tell myself

that the days of my further sojourn in Germany were numbered. And in

fact the news from Dresden, when we returned to Weimar the next day,

was serious indeed. Liszt, on his return on the third day, found a

letter from my wife, who had not dared to write direct to me. She

reported that the police had searched my house in Dresden, to which she

had returned, and that she had, moreover been warned on no account to

allow me to return to that city, as a warrant had been taken out

against me, and I was shortly to be served with a writ and arrested.

Liszt, who was now solely concerned for my personal safety, called in a

friend who had some experience of law, to consider what should be done

to rescue me from the danger that threatened me. Von Watzdorf, the

minister whom I had already visited, had been of opinion that I should,

if required, submit quietly to being taken to Dresden, and that the

journey would be made in a respectable private carriage. On the other

hand, reports which had reached us of the brutal way in which the

Prussian troops in Dresden had gone to work in applying the state of

siege were of so alarming a nature that Liszt and his friends in

council urged my speedy departure from Weimar, where it would be

impossible to protect me. But I insisted on taking leave of my wife,

whose anxiety was great, before leaving Germany, and begged to be

allowed to stay a little longer at least in the neighbourhood of

Weimar. This was taken into consideration, and Professor Siebert

suggested my taking temporary shelter with a friendly steward at the

village of Magdala, which was three hours distant. I drove there the

following morning to introduce myself to this kind steward and

protector as Professor Werder from Berlin, who, with a letter of

recommendation from Professor Siebert, had come to turn his financial

studies to practical account in helping to administer these estates.

Here in rural seclusion I spent three days, entertainment of a peculiar

nature being provided by the meeting of a popular assembly, which

consisted of the remainder of the contingent of revolutionaries which

had marched off towards Dresden and had now returned in disorder. I

listened with curious feelings, amounting almost to contempt, to the

speeches on this occasion, which were of every kind and description. On

the second day of my stay my host’s wife came back from Weimar (where

it was market-day) full of a curious tale: the composer of an opera

which was being performed there on that very day had been obliged to

leave Weimar suddenly because the warrant for his arrest had arrived

from Dresden. My host, who had been let into my secret by Professor

Seibert, asked playfully what his name was. As his wife did not seem to

know, he came to her assistance with the suggestion that perhaps it was

Röckel whose name was familiar at Weimar.

‘Yes,’ she said, ‘Röckel, that was his name, quite right.’

My host laughed loudly, and said that he would not be so stupid as to

let them catch him, in spite of his opera.

At last, on 22nd May, my birthday, Minna actually arrived at Magdala.

She had hastened to Weimar on receiving my letter, and had proceeded

from there according to instructions, bent on persuading me at all

costs to flee the country immediately and for good. No attempt to raise

her to the level of my own mood was successful; she persisted in

regarding me as an ill-advised, inconsiderate person who had plunged

both himself and her into the most terrible situation. It had been

arranged that I should meet her the next evening in the house of

Professor Wolff at Jena to take a last farewell. She was to go by way

of Weimar, while I took the footpath from Magdala. I started

accordingly on my walk of about six hours, and came over the plateau

into the little university town (which now received me hospitably for

the first time) at sunset. I found my wife again at the house of

Professor Wolff, who, thanks to Liszt, was already my friend, and with

the addition of a certain Professor Widmann another conference was held

on the subject of my further escape. A writ was actually out against me

for being strongly suspected of participation in the Dresden rising,

and I could not under any circumstances depend on a safe refuge in any

of the German federal states. Liszt insisted on my going to Paris,

where I could find a new field for my work, while Widmann advised me

not to go by the direct route through Frankfort and Baden, as the

rising was still in full swing there, and the police would certainly

exercise praiseworthy vigilance over incoming travellers with

suspicious-looking passports. The way through Bavaria would be the

safest, as all was quiet there again; I could then make for

Switzerland, and the journey to Paris from there could be engineered

without any danger. As I needed a passport for the journey, Professor

Widmann offered me his own, which had been issued at Tubingen and had

not been brought up to date. My wife was quite in despair, and the

parting from her caused me real pain. I set off in the mail-coach and

travelled, without further hindrance, through many towns (amongst them

Rudolstadt, a place full of memories for me) to the Bavarian frontier.

From there I continued my journey by mail-coach straight to Lindau. At

the gates I, together with the other passengers, was asked for my

passport. I passed the night in a state of strange, feverish

excitement, which lasted until the departure of the steamer on Lake

Constance early in the morning. My mind was full of the Swabian

dialect, as spoken by Professor Widmann, with whose passport I was

travelling. I pictured to myself my dealings with the Bavarian police

should I have to converse with them in accordance with the

above-mentioned irregularities in that document. A prey to feverish

unrest, I spent the whole night trying to perfect myself in the Swabian

dialect, but, as I was amused to find, without the smallest success. I

had braced myself to meet the crucial moment early the next morning,

when the policeman came into my room and, not knowing to whom the

passports belonged, gave me three at random to choose from. With joy in

my heart I seized my own, and dismissed the dreaded messenger in the

most friendly way. Once on board the steamer I realised with true

satisfaction that I had now stepped on to Swiss territory. It was a

lovely spring morning; across the broad lake I could gaze at the Alpine

landscape as it spread itself before my eyes. When I stepped on to

Republican soil at Rorschach, I employed the first moments in writing a

few lines home to tell of my safe arrival in Switzerland and my

deliverance from all danger. The coach drive through the pleasant

country of St. Gall to Zürich cheered me up wonderfully, and when I

drove down from Oberstrass into Zürich that evening, the last day in

May, at six o’clock, and saw for the first time the Glarner Alps that

encircle the lake gleaming in the sunset, I at once resolved, though

without being fully conscious of it, to avoid everything that could

prevent my settling here.

I had been the more willing to accept my friends’ suggestion to take

the Swiss route to Paris, as I knew I should find an old acquaintance,

Alexander Muller, at Zürich. I hoped with his help to obtain a passport

to France, as I was anxious not to arrive there as a political refugee.

I had been on very friendly terms with Muller once upon a time at

Wurzburg. He had been settled at Zürich for a long time as a teacher of

music; this I learned from a pupil of his, Wilhelm Baumgartner, who had

called on me in Dresden some years back to bring me a greeting from

this old friend. On that occasion I entrusted the pupil with a copy of

the score of Tannhäuser for his master, by way of remembrance, and this

kind attention had not fallen on barren soil: Muller and Baumgartner,

whom I visited forthwith, introduced me at once to Jacob Sulzer and

Franz Hagenbuch, two cantonal secretaries who were the most likely,

among all their good friends, to compass the immediate fulfilment of my

desire. These two people, who had been joined by a few intimates,

received me with such respectful curiosity and sympathy that I felt at

home with them at once. The great assurance and moderation with which

they commented on the persecutions which had overtaken me, as seen from

their usual simple republican standpoint, opened to me a conception of

civil life which seemed to lift me to an entirely new sphere. I felt so

safe and protected here, whereas in my own country I had, without quite

realising it, come to be considered a criminal owing to the peculiar

connection between my disgust at the public attitude towards art and

the general political disturbances. To prepossess the two secretaries

entirely in my favour (one of them, Sulzer, had enjoyed an excellent

classical education), my friends arranged a meeting one evening at

which I was to read my poem on the Death of Siegfried. I am prepared to

swear that I never had more attentive listeners, among men, than on

that evening. The immediate effect of my success was the drawing up of

a fully valid federal passport for the poor German under warrant of

arrest, armed with which I started gaily on my journey to Paris after

quite a short stay at Zürich. From Strassburg, where I was enthralled

by the fascination of the world-famous minster, I travelled towards

Paris by what was then the best means of locomotion, the so-called

malle-poste. I remember a remarkable phenomenon in connection with this

conveyance. Till then the noise of the cannonade and musketry in the

fighting at Dresden had been persistently re-echoing in my ears,

especially in a half-waking condition; now the humming of the wheels,

as we rolled rapidly along the highroad, cast such a spell upon me that

for the whole of the journey I seemed to hear the melody of Freude,

schöner Götterfunken[17] from the Ninth Symphony being played, as it

were, on deep bass instruments.

[17] See note on page 486.

From the time of my entering Switzerland till my arrival in Paris my

spirits, which had sunk into a dreamlike apathy, rose gradually to a

level of freedom and comfort that I had never enjoyed before. I felt

like a bird in the air whose destiny is not to founder in a morass; but

soon after my arrival in Paris, in the first week of June, a very

palpable reaction set in. I had had an introduction from Liszt to his

former secretary Belloni, who felt it his duty, in loyalty to the

instructions received, to put me into communication with a literary

man, a certain Gustave Vaisse, with the object of being commissioned to

write an opera libretto for production in Paris. I did not, however,

make the personal acquaintance of Vaisse. The idea did not please me,

and I found sufficient excuse for warding off the negotiations by

saying I was afraid of the epidemic of cholera which was said to be

raging in the city. I was staying in the Rue Notre Dame de Lorette for

the sake of being near Belloni. Through this street funeral

processions, announced by the muffled drum boats of the National Guard,

passed practically every hour. Though the heat was stifling, I was

strictly forbidden to touch water, and was advised to exercise the

greatest precaution with regard to diet in every respect. Besides this

weight of uneasiness on my spirits, the whole outward aspect of Paris,

as it then appeared, had the most depressing effect on me. The motto,

liberte, egalite, fraternite was still to be seen on all the public

buildings and other establishments, but, on the other hand, I was

alarmed at seeing the first garcons caissiers making their way from the

bank with their long money-sacks over their shoulders and their large

portfolios in their hands. I had never met them so frequently as now,

just when the old capitalist regime, after its triumphant struggle

against the once dreaded socialist propaganda, was exerting itself

vigorously to regain the public confidence by its almost insulting

pomp. I had gone, as it were, mechanically into Schlesinger’s

music-shop, where a successor was now installed—a much more pronounced

type of Jew named Brandus, of a very dirty appearance. The only person

there to give me a friendly welcome was the old clerk, Monsieur Henri.

After I had talked to him in loud tones for some time, as the shop was

apparently empty, he at length asked me with some embarrassment whether

I had not seen my master (_votre maître_) Meyerbeer.

‘Is Monsieur Meyerbeer here?’ I asked.

‘Certainly,’ was the even more embarrassed reply; ‘quite near, over

there behind the desk.’

And, sure enough, as I walked across to the desk Meyerbeer came out,

covered with confusion. He smiled and made some excuse about pressing

proof-sheets. He had been hiding there quietly for over ten minutes

since first hearing my voice. I had had enough after my strange

encounter with this apparition. It recalled so many things affecting

myself which reflected suspicion on the man, in particular the

significance of his behaviour towards me in Berlin on the last

occasion. However, as I had now nothing more to do with him, I greeted

him with a certain easy gaiety induced by the regret I felt at seeing

his manifest confusion on becoming cognisant of my arrival in Paris. He

took it for granted that I should again seek my fortune there, and

seemed much surprised when I assured him, on the contrary, that the

idea of having any work there was odious to me.

‘But Liszt published such a brilliant article about you in the _Journal

des Débats_,’ he said.

‘Ah,’ I replied, ‘it really had not occurred to me that the

enthusiastic devotion of a friend should be regarded as a mutual

speculation.’

‘But the article made a sensation. It is incredible that you should not

seek to make any profit out of it.’

This offensive meddlesomeness roused me to protest to Meyerbeer with

some violence that I was concerned with anything rather than with the

production of artistic work, particularly just at that time when the

course of events seemed to indicate that the whole world was undergoing

a reaction.

‘But what do you expect to get out of the revolution?’ he replied. ‘Are

you going to write scores for the barricades?’

Whereupon I assured him that I was not thinking of writing any scores

at all. We parted, obviously without having arrived at a mutual

understanding.

In the street I was also stopped by Moritz Schlesinger, who, being

equally under the influence of Liszt’s brilliant article, evidently

considered me a perfect prodigy. He too thought I must be counting on

making a hit in Paris, and was sure that I had a very good chance of

doing so.

‘Will you undertake my business?’ I asked him. ‘I have no money. Do you

really think the performance of an opera by an unknown composer can be

anything but a matter of money?’

‘You are quite right,’ said Moritz, and left me on the spot.

I turned from these disagreeable encounters in the plague-stricken

capital of the world to inquire the fate of my Dresden companions, for

some of those with whom I was intimate had also reached Paris, when I

called on Desplechins, who had painted the scenery for Tannhäuser. I

found Semper there, who had, like myself, been deposited in this city.

We met again with no little pleasure, although we could not help

smiling at our grotesque situation. Semper had retired from the battle

when the famous barricade, which he in his capacity of architect kept

under close observation, had been surrounded. (He thought it impossible

for it to be captured.) All the same, he considered that he had exposed

himself quite sufficiently to make it state of siege and were occupying

Dresden. He considered himself lucky as a native of Holstein to be

dependent, not on the German, but on the Danish government for a

passport, as this had helped him to reach Paris without difficulty.

When I expressed my real and heartfelt regret at the turn of affairs

which had torn him from a professional undertaking on which he had just

started—the completion of the Dresden Museum—he refused to take it too

seriously, saying it had given him a great deal of worry. In spite of

our trying situation, it was with Semper that I spent the only bright

hours of my stay in Paris. We were soon joined by another refugee,

young Heine, who had once wished to paint my Lohengrin scenery. He had

no qualms about his future, for his master Desplechins was willing to

give him employment. I alone felt I had been pitched quite aimlessly

into Paris. I had a passionate desire to leave this cholera-laden,

atmosphere, and Belloni offered me an opportunity which I promptly and

joyfully seized. He invited me to follow himself and his family to a

country place near La Ferte-sous-Jouarre, where I could be refreshed by

pure air and absolute quiet, and wait for a change for the better in my

position. I made the short journey to Rueil after another week in

Paris, and took for the time being a poor lodging (one room, built with

recesses) in the house of Monsieur Raphael, a wine merchant, close by

the village mairie where the Belloni family were staying. Here I waited

further developments. During the period when all news from Germany

ceased I tried to occupy myself as far as possible with reading. After

going through Proudhon’s writings, and in particular his De la

propriete, in such a manner as to glean comfort for my situation in

curiously divers ways, I entertained myself for a considerable time

with Lamartine’s Histoire des Girondins, a most alluring and attractive

work. One day Belloni brought me news of the unfortunate rising in

Paris, which had been attempted on the 13th June by the Republicans

under Ledru-Rollin against the provisional government, which was then

in the full tide of reaction. Great as was the indignation with which

the news was received by my host and the mayor of the place (a relative

of his, at whose table we ate our modest daily meal), it made, on the

whole, little impression on me, as my attention was still fixed in

great agitation on the events which were taking place on the Rhine, and

particularly on the grand-duchy of Baden, which had been made forfeit

to a provisional government. When, however, the news reached me from

this quarter also that the Prussians had succeeded in subduing a

movement which had not at first seemed hopeless, I felt extraordinarily

downcast.

I was compelled to consider my position carefully, and the necessity of

conquering my difficulties helped to allay the excitement to which I

was a prey. The letters from my Weimar friends, as well as those from

my wife, now brought me completely to my senses. The former expressed

themselves very curtly about my behaviour with regard to recent events.

The opinion was, that for the moment there would be nothing for me to

do, and especially not in Dresden, or at the grand-ducal court, ‘as one

could not very well knock at battered doors’; ‘on ne frappe pas a des

portes enfoncees’ (Princess von Wittgenstein to Belloni).

I did not know what to reply, for I had never dreamt of expecting

anything to come from their intervening on my behalf in that quarter;

consequently I was quite satisfied that they sent me temporarily

financial assistance. With this money I made up my mind to leave for

Zürich and ask Alex Muller to give me shelter for a while, as his house

was sufficiently large to accommodate a guest. My saddest moment came

when, after a long silence, I at last received a letter from my wife.

She wrote that she could not dream of living with me again; that after

I had so unscrupulously thrown away a connection and position, the like

of which would never again present itself to me, no woman could

reasonably be expected to take any further interest in my future

enterprises.

I fully appreciated my wife’s unfortunate position; I could in no way

assist her, except by advising her to sell our Dresden furniture, and

by making an appeal on her behalf to my relatives in Leipzig.

Until then I had been able to think more lightly of the misery of her

position, simply because I had imagined her to be more deeply in

sympathy with what agitated me. Often during the recent extraordinary

events I had even believed that she understood my feelings. Now,

however, she had disillusioned me on this point: she could see in me no

more than what the public saw, and the one redeeming point of her

severe judgment was that she excused my behaviour on the score that I

was reckless. After I had begged Liszt to do what he could for my wife,

I soon began to regard her unexpected behaviour with more equanimity.

In reply to her announcement that she would not write to me again for

the present, I said that I had also resolved to spare her all further

anxiety about my very doubtful fate, by ceasing from communicating with

her. I surveyed the panorama of our long years of association

critically in my mind’s eye, beginning with that first stormy year of

our married life, that had been so full of sorrow. Our youthful days of

worry and care in Paris had undoubtedly been of benefit to us both. The

courage and patience with which she had faced our difficulties, while I

on my part had tried to end them by dint of hard work, had linked us

together with bonds of iron. Minna was rewarded for all these

privations by Dresden successes, and more especially by the highly

enviable position I had held there. Her position as wife of the

conductor (Frau Kapellmeisterin) had brought her the fulfilment of her

dearest wishes, and all those things which conspired to make my work in

this official post so intolerable to me, were to her no more than so

many threats directed against her smug content. The course I had

adopted with regard to Tannhäuser had already made her doubtful of my

success at the theatres, and had robbed her of all courage and

confidence in our future. The more I deviated from the path which she

regarded as the only profitable one, due partly to the change of my

views (which I grew ever less willing to communicate to her), and

partly to the modification in my attitude towards the stage, the more

she retreated from that position of close fellowship with me which she

had enjoyed in former years, and which she thought herself justified in

connecting in some way with my successes.

She looked upon my conduct with regard to the Dresden catastrophe as

the outcome of this deviation from the right path, and attributed it to

the influence of unscrupulous persons (particularly the unfortunate

Röckel), who were supposed to have dragged me with them to ruin, by

appealing to my vanity. Deeper than all these disagreements, however,

which, after all, were concerned only with external circumstances, was

the consciousness of our fundamental incompatibility, which to me had

become ever more and more apparent since the day of our reconciliation.

From the very beginning we had had scenes of the most violent

description: never once after these frequent quarrels had she admitted

herself in the wrong or tried to be friends again.

The necessity of speedily restoring our domestic peace, as well as my

conviction (confirmed by every one of her extravagant outbursts) that,

in view of the great disparity of our characters and especially of our

educations, it devolved upon me to prevent such scenes by observing

great caution in my behaviour, always led me to take the entire blame

for what had happened upon myself, and to mollify Minna by showing her

that I was sorry. Unfortunately, and to my intense grief, I was forced

to recognise that by acting in this way I lost all my power over her

affections, and especially over her character. Now we stood in a

position in which I could not possibly resort to the same means of

reconciliation, for it would have meant my being inconsistent in all my

views and actions. And then I found myself confronted by such hardness

in the woman whom I had spoilt by my leniency, that it was out of the

question to expect her to acknowledge the injustice done to myself.

Suffice it to say that the wreck of my married life had contributed not

inconsiderably to the ruin of my position in Dresden, and to the

careless manner in which I treated it, for instead of finding help,

strength, and consolation at home, I found my wife unwittingly

conspiring against me, in league with all the other hostile

circumstances which then beset me. After I had got over the first shock

of her heartless behaviour, I was absolutely clear about this. I

remember that I did not suffer any great sorrow, but that on the

contrary, with the conviction of being now quite helpless, an almost

exalted calm came over me when I realised that up to the present my

life had been built on a foundation of sand and nothing more. At all

events, the fact that I stood absolutely alone did much towards

restoring my peace of mind, and in my distress I now found strength and

comfort even in the fact of my dire poverty. At last assistance arrived

from Weimar. I accepted it eagerly, and it was the means of extricating

me from my present useless life and stranded hopes.

My next move was to find a place of refuge—one, however, which had but

little attraction for me, seeing that in it there was not the slightest

hope of my being able to make any further headway in the paths along

which I had hitherto progressed. This refuge was Zürich, a town devoid

of all art in the public sense, and where for the first time I met

simple-hearted people who knew nothing about me as a musician, but who,

as it appeared, felt drawn towards me by the power of my personality

alone. I arrived at Muller’s house and asked him to let me have a room,

at the same time giving him what remained of my capital, namely twenty

francs. I quickly discovered that my old friend was embarrassed by my

perfectly open confidence in him, and that he was at his wit’s end to

know what to do with me. I soon gave up the large room containing a

grand piano, which he had allotted to me on the impulse of the moment,

and retired to a modest little bedroom. The meals were my great trial,

not because I was fastidious, but because I could not digest thorn.

Outside my friend’s house, on the contrary, I enjoyed what, considering

the habits of the locality, was the most luxurious reception. The same

young men who had been so kind to me on my first journey through Zürich

again showed themselves anxious to be continually in my company, and

this was especially the case with one young fellow called Jakob Sulzer.

He had to be thirty years of age before he was entitled to become a

member of the Zürich government, and he therefore still had several

years to wait. In spite of his youth, however, the impression he made

on all those with whom he came in contact was that of a man of riper

years, whose character was formed. When I was asked long afterwards

whether I had ever met a man who, morally speaking, was the beau-ideal

of real character and uprightness, I could, on reflection, think of

none other than this newly gained friend, Jakob Sulzer.

He owed his early appointment as permanent Cantonal Secretary

(Staatsschreiber), one of the most excellent government posts in the

canton of Zürich, to the recently returned liberal party, led by Alfred

Escher. As this party could not employ the more experienced members of

the older conservative side in the public offices, their policy was to

choose exceptionally gifted young men for these positions. Sulzer

showed extraordinary promise, and their choice accordingly soon lighted

on him. He had only just returned from the Berlin and Bonn universities

with the intention of establishing himself as professor of philology at

the university in his native town, when he was made a member of the new

government. To fit himself for his post he had to stay in Geneva for

six months to perfect himself in the French language, which he had

neglected during his philological studies. He was quick-witted and

industrious, as well as independent and firm, and he never allowed

himself to be swayed by any party tactics. Consequently he rose very

rapidly to high positions in the government, to which he rendered

valuable and important services, first as Minister of Finance, a post

he held for many years, and later with particular distinction as member

of the School Federation. His unexpected acquaintance with me seemed to

place him in a sort of dilemma; from the philological and classical

studies which he had entered upon of his own choice, he suddenly found

himself torn away in the most bewildering manner by this unexpected

summons from the government. It almost seemed as if his meeting with me

had made him regret having accepted the appointment. As he was a person

of great culture, my poem, Siegfried’s Death, naturally revealed to him

my knowledge of German antiquity. He had also studied this subject, but

with greater philological accuracy than I could possibly have aspired

to. When, later on, he became acquainted with my manner of writing

music, this peculiarly serious and reserved man became so thoroughly

interested in my sphere of art, so far removed from his own field of

labour, that, as he himself confessed, he felt it his duty to fight

against these disturbing influences by being intentionally brusque and

curt with me. In the beginning of my stay in Zürich, however, he

delighted in being led some distance astray in the realms of art. The

old-fashioned official residence of the first Cantonal Secretary was

often the scene of unique gatherings, composed of people such as I

would be sure to attract. It might even be said that these social

functions occurred rather more frequently than was advisable for the

reputation of a civil servant of this little philistine state. What

attracted the musician Baumgartner more particularly to these meetings

was the product of Sulzer’s vineyards in Winterthur, to which our hosts

treated his guests with the greatest liberality. When in my moods of

mad exuberance I gave vent in dithyrambic effusions to my most extreme

views on art and life, my listeners often responded in a manner which,

more often than not, I was perfectly right in ascribing to the effects

of the wine rather than to the power of my enthusiasm. Once when

Professor Ettmuller, the Germanist and Edda scholar, had been invited

to listen to a reading of my Siegfried and had been led home in a state

of melancholy enthusiasm, there was a regular outburst of wanton

spirits among those who had remained behind. I conceived the absurd

idea of lifting all the doors of the state official’s house off their

hinges.

Herr Hagenbuch, another servant of the state, seeing what exertion this

cost me, offered me the help of his gigantic physique, and with

comparative ease we succeeded in removing every single door, and laying

it aside, a proceeding at which Sulzer merely smiled good-naturedly.

The next day, however, when we made inquiries, he told us that the

replacing of those doors (which must have been a terrible strain on his

delicate constitution) had taken him the whole night, as he had made up

his mind to keep the knowledge of our orgies from the sergeant, who

always arrived at a very early hour in the morning.

The extraordinary birdlike freedom of my existence had the effect of

exciting me more and more. I was often frightened at the excessive

outbursts of exaltation to which I was prone—no matter whom I was

with—and which led me to indulge in the most extraordinary paradoxes in

my conversation. Soon after I had settled in Zürich I began to write

down my various ideas about things at which I had arrived through my

private and artistic experiences, as well as through the influence of

the political unrest of the day. As I had no choice but to try, to the

best of my ability, to earn something by my pen, I thought of sending a

series of articles to a great French journal such as the National,

which in those days was still extant. In these articles I meant to

propound my ideas (in my revolutionary way) on the subject of modern

art in its relation to society. I sent six of them to an elderly friend

of mine, Albert Franck, requesting him to have them translated into

French and to get them published. This Franck was the brother of the

better-known Hermann Franck, now the head of the Franco-German

bookselling firm, which had originally belonged to my brother-in-law,

Avenarius. He sent me back my work with the very natural remark that it

was out of the question to expect the Parisian public to understand or

appreciate my articles, especially at such a critical moment.

I headed the manuscript Kunst und Revolution (‘Art and Revolution’) and

sent it to Otto Wigand in Leipzig, who actually undertook to publish it

in the form of a pamphlet, and sent me five louis d’or for it. This

unexpected success induced me to continue to exploit my literary gifts.

I looked among my papers for the essay I had written the year before as

the outcome of my historical studies of the ‘Nibelungen’ legend; I gave

it the title of Die Nibelungen Weltgeschichte aus der Sage, and again

tried my luck by sending it to Wigand.

The sensational title of Kunst und Revolution, as well as the notoriety

the ‘royal conductor’ had gained as a political refugee, had made the

radical publisher hope that the scandal that would arise on the

publication of my articles would redound to his benefit! I soon

discovered that he was on the point of issuing a second edition of

Kunst und Revolution, without, however, informing me of the fact. He

also took over my new pamphlet for another five louis d’or. This was

the first time I had earned money by means of published work, and I now

began to believe that I had reached that point when I should be able to

get the better of my misfortunes. I thought it over, and decided to

give public lectures in Zürich on subjects related to my writings

during the coming winter, hoping in that free and haphazard fashion to

keep body and soul together for a little while, although I had no fixed

appointment and did not intend to work at music.

It seemed necessary for me to resort to these means, as I did not know

how otherwise to keep myself alive. Shortly after my arrival in Zürich

I had witnessed the coming of the fragments of the Baden army,

dispersed over Swiss territory, and accompanied by fugitive volunteers,

and this had made a painful and uncanny impression upon me. The news of

the surrender near Villagos by Gorgey paralysed the last hopes as to

the issue of the great European struggle for liberty, which so far had

been left quite undecided. With some misgiving and anxiety I now turned

my eyes from all these occurrences in the outside world inwards to my

own soul.

I was accustomed to patronise the cafe litteraire, where I took my

coffee after my heavy mid-day meal, in a smoky atmosphere surrounded by

a merry and joking throng of men playing dominoes and ‘fast.’ One day I

stared at its common wall-paper representing antique subjects, which in

some inexplicable way recalled a certain water-colour by Genelli to my

mind, portraying ‘The education of Dionysos by the Muses.’ I had seen

it at the house of my brother-in-law Brockhaus in my young days, and it

had made a deep impression on me at the time. At this same place I

conceived the first ideas of my Kunstwerk der Zukunft (‘The Art-Work of

the Future’), and it seemed a significant omen to me to be roused one

day out of one of my post-prandial dreams by the news that

Schroder-Devrient was staying in Zürich. I immediately got up with the

intention of calling on her at the neighbouring hotel, ‘Zum Schwerte,’

but to my great dismay heard that she had just left by steamer. I never

saw her again, and long afterwards only heard of her painful death from

my wife, who in later years became fairly intimate with her in Dresden.

After I had spent two remarkable summer months in this wild and

extraordinary fashion, I at last received reassuring news of Minna, who

had remained in Dresden. Although her manner of taking leave of me had

been both harsh and wounding, I could not bring myself to believe I had

completely parted from her. In a letter I wrote to one of her

relations, and which I presumed they would forward, I made sympathetic

inquiries about her, while I had already done all that lay in my power,

through repeated appeals to Liszt, to ensure her being well cared for.

I now received a direct reply, which, in addition to the fact that it

testified to the vigour and activity with which she had fought her

difficulties, at the same time showed me that she earnestly desired to

be reunited with me. It was almost in terms of contempt that she

expressed her grave doubts as to the possibility of my being able to

make a living in Zürich, but she added that, inasmuch as she was my

wife, she wished to give me another chance. She also seemed to take it

for granted that I intended making Zürich only our temporary home, and

that I would do my utmost to promote my career as a composer of opera

in Paris. Whereupon she announced her intention of arriving at

Rorschach in Switzerland on a certain date in September of that year,

in the company of the little dog Peps, the parrot Papo, and her

so-called sister Nathalie. After having engaged two rooms for our new

home, I now prepared to set out on foot for St. Gall and Rorschach

through the lovely and celebrated Toggenburg and Appenzell, and felt

very touched after all when the peculiar family, which consisted half

of pet animals, landed at the harbour of Rorschach. I must honestly

confess that the little dog and the bird made me very happy. My wife at

once threw cold water on my emotions, however, by declaring that in the

event of my behaving badly again she was ready to return to Dresden any

moment, and that she had numerous friends there, who would be glad to

protect and succour her if she were forced to carry out her threat. Be

this as it may, one look at her convinced me how greatly she had aged

in this short time, and how much I ought to pity her, and this feeling

succeeded in banishing all bitterness from my heart.

I did my utmost to give her confidence and to make her believe that our

present misfortunes were but momentary. This was no easy task, as she

would constantly compare the diminutive aspect of the town of Zürich

with the more noble majesty of Dresden, and seemed to feel bitterly

humiliated. The friends whom I introduced to her found no favour in her

eyes. She looked upon the Cantonal Secretary, Sulzer, as a ‘mere town

clerk who would not be of any importance in. Germany’; and the wife of

my host Muller absolutely disgusted her when, in answer to Minna’s

complaints about my terrible position, she replied that my greatness

lay in the very fact of my having faced it. Then again Minna appeased

me by tolling me of the expected arrival of some of my Dresden

belongings, which she thought would be indispensable to our new home.

The property of which she spoke consisted of a Breitkopf and Hartel

grand-piano that looked better than it sounded, and of the ‘title-page’

of the Nibelungen by Cornelius in a Gothic frame that used to hang over

my desk in Dresden.

With this nucleus of household effects we now decided to take small

lodgings in the so-called ‘hinteren Escherhausern’ in the Zeltweg. With

great cleverness Minna had succeeded in selling the Dresden furniture

to advantage, and out of the proceeds of this sale she had brought

three hundred marks with her to Zürich to help towards setting up our

new home. She told me that she had saved my small but very select

library for me by giving it into the safe custody of the publisher,

Heinrich Brockhaus (brother of my sister’s husband and member of the

Saxon Diet), who had insisted upon looking after it. Great, therefore,

was her dismay when, upon asking this kind friend to send her the

books, he replied that he was holding them as security for a debt of

fifteen hundred marks which I had contracted with him during my days of

trouble in Dresden, and that he intended to keep them until that sum

was returned. As even after the lapse of many years I found it

impossible to refund this money, these books, collected for my own

special wants, were lost to me for ever.

Thanks more particularly to my friend Sulzer, the Cantonal Secretary,

whom my wife at first despised so much on account of his title which

she misunderstood, and who, although he was far from well-off himself,

thought it only natural that he should help me, however moderately, out

of my difficulties, we soon succeeded in making our little place look

so cosy that my simple Zürich friends felt quite at home in it. My

wife, with all her undeniable talents, hero found ample scope in which

to distinguish herself, and I remember how ingeniously she made a

little what-not out of the box in which she had kindly brought my music

and manuscript to Zürich.

But it was soon time to think of how to earn enough money to provide

for us all. My idea of giving public lectures was treated with contempt

by my wife, who looked upon it as an insult to her pride. She could

acquiesce only in one plan, that suggested by Liszt, namely, that I

should write an opera for Paris. To satisfy her, and in view of the

fact that I could see no chance of a remunerative occupation close at

hand, I actually reopened a correspondence on this matter with my great

friend and his secretary Belloni in Paris. In the meantime I could not

be idle, so I accepted an invitation from the Zürich musical society to

conduct a classical composition at one of their concerts, and to this

end I worked with their very poor orchestra at Beethoven’s Symphony in

A major. Although the result was successful, and I received five

napoleons for my trouble, it made my wife very unhappy, for she could

not forget the excellent orchestra, and the much more appreciative

public, which a short time before in Dresden would have seconded and

rewarded similar efforts on my part. Her one and only ideal for me was

that, by hook or by crook, and with a total disregard of all artistic

scruples, I should make a brilliant reputation for myself in Paris.

While we were both absolutely at a loss to discover whence we should

obtain the necessary funds for our journey to Paris and our sojourn

there, I again plunged into my philosophical study of art, as being the

only sphere still left open to me.

Harrassed by the cares of a terrible struggle for existence, I wrote

the whole of Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft in the chilly atmosphere of a

sunless little room on the ground floor during the months of November

and December of that year. Minna had no objection to this occupation

when I told her of the success of my first pamphlet, and the hope I had

of receiving even better pay for this more extensive work.

Thus for a while I enjoyed comparative peace, although in my heart a

spirit of unrest had begun to reign, thanks to my growing acquaintance

with Feuerbach’s works. I had always had an inclination to fathom the

depths of philosophy, just as I had been led by the mystic influence of

Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony to search the deepest recesses of music. My

first efforts at satisfying this longing had failed. None of the

Leipzig professors had succeeded in fascinating me with their lectures

on fundamental philosophy and logic. I had procured Schelling’s work,

Transcendental Idealism, recommended to me by Gustav Schlesinger, a

friend of Laube’s, but it was in vain that I racked my brains to try

and make something out of the first pages, and I always returned to my

Ninth Symphony.

During the latter part of my stay in Dresden I had returned to these

old studies, the longing for which suddenly revived within me, and to

these I added the deeper historical studies which had always fascinated

me. As an introduction to philosophy I now chose Hegel’s Philosophy of

History. A good deal of this impressed me deeply, and it now seemed as

if I should ultimately penetrate into the Holy of Holies along this

path. The more incomprehensible many of his speculative conclusions

appeared, the more I felt myself desirous of probing the question of

the ‘Absolute’ and everything connected therewith to the core. For I so

admired Hegel’s powerful mind that it seemed to me he was the very

keystone of all philosophical thought.

The revolution intervened; the practical tendencies of a social

reconstruction distracted my attention, and as I have already stated,

it was a German Catholic priest and political agitator (formerly a

divinity student named Menzdorff, who used to wear a Calabrian hat)[18]

who drew my attention to ‘the only real philosopher of modern times,’

Ludwig Feuerbach. My new Zürich friend, the piano teacher, Wilhelm

Baumgartner, made me a present of Feuerbach’s book on Tod und

Unsterblichkeit (‘Death and Immortality’). The well-known and stirring

lyrical style of the author greatly fascinated me as a layman. The

intricate questions which he propounds in this book as if they were

being discussed for the first time by him, and which he treats in a

charmingly exhaustive manner, had often occupied my mind since the very

first days of my acquaintance with Lehrs in Paris, just as they occupy

the mind of every imaginative and serious man. With me, however, this

was not lasting, and I had contented myself with the poetic suggestions

on these important subjects which appear here and there in the works of

our great poets.

[18] A broad-rimmed, tall, white felt hat, tapering to a point,

originally worn by the inhabitants of Calabria, and in 1848 a sign of

Republicanism.—EDITOR.

The frankness with which Feuerbach explains his views on these

interesting questions, in the more mature parts of his book, pleased me

as much by their tragic as by their social-radical tendencies. It

seemed right that the only true immortality should be that of sublime

deeds and great works of art. It was more difficult to sustain any

interest in Das Wesen des Christenthums (‘The Essence of Christianity’)

by the same author, for it was impossible whilst reading this work not

to become conscious, however involuntarily, of the prolix and unskilful

manner in which he dilates on the simple and fundamental idea, namely,

religion explained from a purely subjective and psychological point of

view. Nevertheless, from that day onward I always regarded Feuerbach as

the ideal exponent of the radical release of the individual from the

thraldom of accepted notions, founded on the belief in authority. The

initiated will therefore not wonder that I dedicated my Kunstwerk der

Zukunft to Feuerbach and addressed its preface to him.

My friend Sulzer, a thorough disciple of Hegel, was very sorry to see

me so interested in Feuerbach, whom he did not even recognise as a

philosopher at all. He said that the best thing that Feuerbach had done

for me was that he had been the means of awakening my ideas, although

he himself had none. But what had really induced me to attach so much

importance to Feuerbach was the conclusion by means of which he had

seceded from his master Hegel, to wit, that the best philosophy was to

have no philosophy—a theory which greatly simplified what I had

formerly considered a very terrifying study—and secondly, that only

that was real which could be ascertained by the senses.

The fact that he proclaimed what we call ‘spirit’ to be an aesthetic

perception of our senses, together with his statement concerning the

futility of philosophy—these were the two things in him which rendered

me such useful assistance in my conceptions of an all-embracing work of

art, of a perfect drama which should appeal to the simplest and most

purely human emotions at the very moment when it approached its

fulfilment as Kunstwerk der Zukunft. It must have been this which

Sulzer had in his mind when he spoke deprecatingly of Feuerbach’s

influence over me. At all events, after a while I certainly could not

return to his works, and I remember that his newly published book, Uber

das Wesen der Religion (‘Lectures on the Essence of Religion’), scared

me to such an extent by the dullness of its title alone, that when

Herwegh opened it for my benefit, I closed it with a bang under his

very nose.

At that time I was working with great enthusiasm upon the draft of a

connected essay, and was delighted one day to receive a visit from the

novelist and Tieckian scholar, Eduard von Billow (the father of my

young friend Billow), who was passing through Zürich. In my tiny little

room I read him my chapter on poetry, and could not help noticing that

he was greatly startled at my ideas on literary drama and on the advent

of the new Shakespeare. I thought this all the more reason why Wigand

the publisher should accept my new revolutionary book, and expected him

to pay me a fee which would be in proportion to the greater size of the

work. I asked for twenty louis d’or, and this sum he agreed to pay me.

The prospect of receiving this amount induced me to carry out the plan,

which need had forced upon me, of travelling to Paris and of trying my

luck there as a composer of opera. This plan had very serious

drawbacks; not only did I hate the idea, but I knew that I was doing an

injustice to myself by believing in the success of my enterprise, for I

felt that I could never seriously throw myself into it heart and soul.

Everything, however, combined to make me try the experiment, and it was

Liszt in particular who, confident of this being my only way to fame,

insisted upon my reopening the negotiations into which Belloni and I

had entered during the previous summer. To show with what earnestness I

tried to consider the chances of carrying out my plan, I drafted out

the plot of the opera, which the French poet would only have to put

into verse, because I never for a moment fancied that it would be

possible for him to think out and write a libretto for which I would

only need to compose the music. I chose for my subject the legend of

Wieland der Schmied, upon which I commented with some stress at the end

of my recently finished Kunstwerk der Zukunft, and the version of which

by Simrock, taken from the Wilkyna legend, had greatly attracted me.

I sketched out the complete scenario with precise indication of the

dialogue for three acts, and with a heavy heart decided to hand it over

to my Parisian author to be worked out. Liszt thought he saw a means of

making my music known through his relations with Seghers, the musical

director of a society then known as the ‘Concerts de St. Cecile.’ In

January of the following year the Tannhäuser Overture was to be given

under his baton, and it therefore seemed advisable that I should reach

Paris some time before this event. This undertaking, which appeared to

be so difficult owing to my complete lack of funds, was at last

facilitated in a manner quite unexpected.

I had written home for help, and had appealed to all the old friends I

could think of, but in vain. By the family of my brother Albert in

particular, whose daughter had recently entered upon a brilliant

theatrical career, I was treated in much the same way as one treats an

invalid by whom one dreads to become infected. In contrast to their

harshness I was deeply touched by the devotion of the Ritter family,

who had remained in Dresden; for, apart from my acquaintance with young

Karl, I scarcely knew these people at all. Through the kindness of my

old friend Heine, who had been informed of my position, Frau Julie

Ritter, the venerable mother of the family, had thought it her duty to

place, through a business friend, the sum of fifteen hundred marks at

my disposal. At about the same time I received a letter from Mme.

Laussot, who had called upon me in Dresden the year before, and who now

in the most affecting terms assured me of her continued sympathy.

These were the first signs of that new phase in my life upon which I

entered from this day forth, and in which I accustomed myself to look

upon the outward circumstances of my existence as being merely

subservient to my will. And by this means I was able to escape from the

hampering narrowness of my home life.

For the moment the proffered financial assistance was very distasteful

to me, for it seemed to forbid my raising any further objections to the

realisation of the detested Paris schemes. When, however, on the

strength of this favourable change in my affairs, I suggested to my

wife that we might, after all, content ourselves with remaining in

Zürich, she flew into the most violent passion over my weakness and

lack of spirit, and declared that if I did not make up my mind to

achieve something in Paris, she would lose all faith in me. She said,

moreover, that she absolutely refused to be a witness of my misery and

grief as a wretched literary man and insignificant conductor of local

concerts in Zürich.

We had entered upon the year 1850; I had decided to go to Paris, if

only for the sake of peace, but had to postpone my journey on account

of ill-health. The reaction following upon the terrible excitement of

recent times had not failed to have its effect on my overwrought

nerves, and a state of complete exhaustion had followed. The continual

colds, in spite of which I had been obliged to work in my very

unhealthy room, had at last given rise to alarming symptoms. A certain

weakness of the chest became apparent, and this the doctor (a political

refugee) undertook to cure by the application of pitch plasters. As the

result of this treatment and the irritating effect it had upon my

nerves, I lost my voice completely for a while; whereupon I was told

that I must go away for a change. On going out to buy my ticket for the

journey, I felt so weak and broke out into such terrible perspiration

that I hastened to return to my wife in order to consult her as to the

advisability, in the circumstances, of abandoning the idea of the

expedition altogether. She, however, maintained (and perhaps rightly)

not only that my condition was not dangerous, but that it was to a

large extent due to imagination, and that, once in the right place, I

would soon recover.

An inexpressible feeling of bitterness stimulated my nerves as in anger

and despair I quickly left the house to buy the confounded ticket for

the journey, and in the beginning of February I actually started on the

road to Paris. I was filled with the most extraordinary feelings, but

the spark of hope which was then kindled in my breast certainly had

nothing whatever to do with the belief that had been imposed upon me

from without, that I was to make a success in Paris as a composer of

operas.

I was particularly anxious to find quiet rooms, for peace had now

become my first necessity, no matter where I happened to be staying.

The cabman who drove me from street to street through the most isolated

quarters, and whom I at last accused of keeping always to the most

animated parts of the city, finally protested in despair that one did

not come to Paris to live in a convent. At last it occurred to me to

look for what I wanted in one of the cites through which no vehicle

seemed to drive, and I decided to engage rooms in the Cite de Provence.

True to the plans which had been forced upon me, I at once called on

Herr Seghers about the performance of the Tannhäuser Overture.

It turned out that in spite of my late arrival I had missed nothing,

for they were still racking their brains as to how to procure the

necessary orchestral parts.

I therefore had to write to Liszt, asking him to order the copies, and

had to wait for their arrival. Belloni was not in town, things were

therefore at a standstill, and I had plenty of time to think over the

object of my visit to Paris, while an unceasing accompaniment was

poured out to my meditations by the barrel-organs which infest the

cites of Paris.

I had much difficulty in convincing an agent of the government, from

whom I received a visit soon after my arrival, that my presence in

Paris was due to artistic reasons, and not to my doubtful position as a

political refugee.

Fortunately he was impressed by the score, which I showed him, as well

as by Liszt’s article on the Tannhäuser Overture, written the year

before in the Journal des Debats, and he left me, politely inviting me

to continue my avocations peacefully and industriously, as the police

had no intention of disturbing me.

I also looked up my older Parisian acquaintances. At the hospitable

house of Desplechins I met Semper, who was trying to make his position

as tolerable as possible by writing some inferior artistic work. He had

left his family in Dresden, from which town we soon received the most

alarming news. The prisons were gradually filling there with the

unfortunate victims of the recent Saxon movement Of Röckel, Bakunin,

and Heubner, all we could hear was that they had been charged with high

treason, and that they were awaiting the death sentence.

In view of the tidings which continually arrived concerning the cruelty

and brutality with which the soldiers treated the prisoners, we could

not help considering our own lot a very happy one.

My intercourse with Semper, whom I saw frequently, was generally

enlivened by a gaiety which was occasionally of rather a risky nature;

he was determined to rejoin his family in London, where the prospect of

various appointments was open to him. My latest attempts at writing,

and the thoughts expressed in my work, interested him greatly, and gave

rise to animated conversations in which we were joined by Kietz, who

was at first amusing, but evidently boring Semper considerably. I found

the former in the identical position in which I had left him many years

ago: he had made no headway with his painting, and would have been glad

if the revolution had taken a more decided turn, so that, under cover

of the general confusion, he might have escaped from his embarrassing

position with his landlord. He made at this time quite a good pastel

portrait of me in his very best and earliest style. While I was sitting

I unfortunately spoke to him about my Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft, and

thereby laid the foundation for him of troubles that lasted many years,

as he tried to instil my new ideas into the Parisian bourgeoisie at

whose tables he had hitherto been a welcome guest. Notwithstanding, he

remained as of old a good, obliging, true-hearted fellow, and even

Semper could not help putting up with him cheerfully. I also looked up

my friend Anders. It was a difficult matter to find him at any hour of

the day, since out of sleeping hours he was closeted in the library,

where he could receive no one, and afterwards retired to the

reading-room to spend his hours of rest, and generally went to dine

with certain bourgeois families where he gave music lessons. He had

aged considerably, but I was glad to find him, comparatively speaking,

in better health than the state in which I had last seen him had

allowed me to hope, as when I left Paris before he had seemed to be in

a decline. Curiously enough, a broken leg had been the means of

improving his health, the treatment necessary for it having taken him

to a hydro, where his condition had much improved. His one idea was to

see me achieve a great success in Paris, and he wished to secure a seat

in advance for the first performance of my opera, which he took for

granted was to appear, and kept repeating that it would be so very

trying for him to occupy a place in any part of the theatre where there

would be likely to be a crush. He could not see the use of my present

literary work; in spite of this I was again engaged on it exclusively,

as I soon ascertained there was no likelihood of my overture to

Tannhäuser being produced. Liszt had shown the greatest zeal in

obtaining and forwarding the orchestral parts; but Herr Seghers

informed me that as far as his own orchestra was concerned, he found

himself in a republican democracy where each instrument had an equal

right to voice its opinion, and it had been unanimously decided that

for the remainder of the winter season, which was now drawing to a

close, my overture could be dispensed with. I gathered enough from this

turn of affairs to realise how precarious my position was.

It is true, the result of my writings was hardly less discouraging. A

copy of the Wigand edition of my Kunstwerk der Zukunft was forwarded to

me full of horrible misprints, and instead of the expected remuneration

of twenty louis d’or, my publisher explained that for the present he

could only pay me half this sum, as, owing to the fact that at first

the sale of the Kunst und Revolution had been very rapid, he had been

led to attach too high a commercial value to my writings, a mistake he

had speedily discovered when he found there was no demand for Die

Nibelungen.

On the other hand, I received an offer of remunerative work from Adolph

Kolatschek, who was also a fugitive, and was just going to bring out a

German monthly journal as the organ of the progressive party. In

response to this invitation I wrote a long essay on Kunst und Klima

(‘Art and Climate’), in which I supplemented the ideas I had already

touched upon in my Kunstwerk der Zukunft. Besides this I had, since my

arrival in Paris, worked out a more complete sketch of Wieland der

Schmied. It is true that this work had no longer any value, and I

wondered with apprehension what I could write home to my wife, now that

the last precious remittance had been so aimlessly sacrificed. The

thought of returning to Zürich was as distasteful to me as the prospect

of remaining any longer in Paris. My feelings with regard to the latter

alternative were intensified by the impression made upon me by

Meyerbeer’s opera The Prophet, which had just been produced and which I

had not heard before. Rearing itself on the ruins of the hopes for new

and more noble endeavour which had animated the better works of the

past year—the only result of the negotiations of the provisional French

republic for the encouragement of art—I saw this work of Meyerbeer’s

break upon the world like the dawn heralding this day of disgraceful

desolation. I was so sickened by this performance, that though I was

unfortunately placed in the centre of the stalls and would willingly

have avoided the disturbance necessarily occasioned by one of the

audience moving during the middle of an act, even this consideration

did not deter me from getting up and leaving the house. When the famous

mother of the prophet finally gives vent to her grief in the well-known

series of ridiculous roulades, I was filled with rage and despair at

the thought that I should be called upon to listen to such a thing, and

never again did I pay the slightest heed to this opera.

But what was I to do next? Just as the South American republics had

attracted me during my first miserable sojourn in Paris, so now my

longing was directed towards the East, where I could live my life in a

manner worthy of a human being far away from this modern world. While I

was in this frame of mind I was called upon to answer another inquiry

as to my state of health from Mme. Laussot in Bordeaux. It turned out

that my answer prompted her to send me a kind and pressing invitation

to go and stay at her house, at least for a short time, to rest and

forget my troubles. In any circumstances an excursion to more southerly

regions, which I had not yet seen, and a visit to people who, though

utter strangers, showed such friendly interest in me, could not fail to

prove attractive and flattering. I accepted, settled my affairs in

Paris, and went by coach via Orleans, Tours, and Angouleme, down the

Gironde to the unknown town, where I was received with great courtesy

and cordiality by the young wine merchant Eugene Laussot, and presented

to my sympathetic young friend, his wife. A closer acquaintance with

the family, in which Mrs. Taylor, Mme. Laussot’s mother, was now also

included, led to a clearer understanding of the character of the

sympathy bestowed upon me in such a cordial and unexpected manner by

people hitherto unknown to me. Jessie, as the young wife was called at

home, had, during a somewhat lengthy stay in Dresden, become very

intimate with the Ritter family, and I had no reason to doubt the

assurance given me, that the Laussots’ interest in me and my work was

principally owing to this intimacy. After my flight from Dresden, as

soon as the news of my difficulties had reached the Ritters, a

correspondence had been carried on between Dresden and Bordeaux with a

view to ascertaining how best to assist me. Jessie attributed the whole

idea to Frau Julie Ritter who, while not being well enough off herself

to make me a sufficient allowance, was endeavouring to come to an

understanding with Jessie’s mother, the well-to-do widow of an English

lawyer, whose income entirely supported the young couple in Bordeaux.

This plan had so far succeeded, that shortly after my arrival in

Bordeaux Mrs. Taylor informed me that the two families had combined,

and that it had been decided to ask me to accept the help of three

thousand francs a year until the return of better days. My one object

now was to enlighten my benefactors as to the exact conditions under

which I should be accepting such assistance. I could no longer reckon

upon achieving any success as a composer of opera either in Paris or

elsewhere; what line I should take up instead I did not know; but, at

all events, I was determined to keep myself free from the disgrace

which would reflect upon my whole life if I used such means as this

offer presented to secure success. I feel sure I am not wrong in

believing that Jessie was the only one who understood me, and though I

only experienced kindness from the rest of the family, I soon

discovered the gulf by which she, as well as myself, was separated from

her mother and husband. While the husband, who was a handsome young

man, was away the greater part of the day attending to his business,

and the mother’s deafness excluded her to a great extent from our

conversations, we soon discovered by a rapid exchange of ideas that we

shared the same opinions on many important matters, and this led to a

great feeling of friendship between us. Jessie, who was at that time

about twenty-two, bore little resemblance to her mother, and no doubt

took after her father, of whom I heard most flattering accounts. A

large and varied collection of books loft by this man to his daughter

showed his tastes, for besides carrying on his lucrative profession as

a lawyer, he had devoted himself to the study of literature and

science. From him Jessie had also learned German as a child, and she

spoke that language with great fluency. She had been brought up on

Grimm’s fairy-tales, and was, moreover, thoroughly acquainted with

German poetry, as well as with that of England and France, and her

knowledge of them was as thorough as the most advanced education could

demand. French literature did not appeal to her much. Her quick powers

of comprehension were astonishing. Everything which I touched upon she

immediately grasped and assimilated. It was the same with music: she

read at sight with the greatest facility, and was an accomplished

player. During her stay in Dresden she had been told that I was still

in search of the pianist who could play Beethoven’s great Sonata in B

flat major, and she now astonished me by her finished rendering of this

most difficult piece. The emotion aroused in me by finding such an

exceptionally developed talent suddenly changed to anxiety when I heard

her sing. Her sharp, shrill voice, in which there was strength but no

real depth of feeling, so shocked me that I could not refrain from

begging her to desist from singing in future. With regard to the

execution of the sonata, she listened eagerly to my instructions as to

how it should be interpreted, though I could not feel that she would

succeed in rendering it according to my ideas. I read her my latest

essays, and she seemed to understand even the most extraordinary

descriptions perfectly. My poem on Siegfried’s Tod moved her deeply,

but she preferred my sketch of Wieland der Schmied. She admitted

afterwards that she would prefer to imagine herself filling the role of

Wieland’s worthy bride than to find herself in the position and forced

to endure the fate of Gutrune in Siegfried. It followed inevitably that

the presence of the other members of the family proved embarrassing

when we wanted to talk over and discuss these various subjects. If we

felt somewhat troubled at having to confess to ourselves that Mrs.

Taylor would certainly never be able to understand why I was being

offered assistance, I was still more disconcerted at realising after a

time the complete want of harmony between the young couple,

particularly from an intellectual point of view. The fact that Laussot

had for some time been well aware of his wife’s dislike for him was

plainly shown when he one day so far forgot himself as to complain

loudly and bitterly that she would not even love a child of his if she

had one, and that he therefore thought it fortunate that she was not a

mother. Astonished and saddened, I suddenly gazed into an abyss which

was hidden here, as is often the case, under the appearance of a

tolerably happy married life. About this time, and just as my visit,

which had already lasted three weeks, was drawing to a close, I

received a letter from my wife that could not have had a more

unfortunate effect on my state of mind. She was, on the whole, pleased

at my having found new friends, but at the same time explained that if

I did not immediately return to Paris, and there endeavour to secure

the production of my overture with the results anticipated, she would

not know what to think of me, and would certainly fail to understand me

if I returned to Zürich without having effected my purpose. At the same

time my depression was intensified in a terrible way by a notice in the

papers announcing that Röckel, Bakunin, and Heubner had been sentenced

to death, and that the date of their execution was fixed. I wrote a

short but stirring letter of farewell to the two first, and as I saw no

possibility of having it conveyed to the prisoners, who were confined

in the fortress of Konigstein, I decided to send it to Frau von

Lüttichau, to be forwarded to them by her, because I thought she was

the only person in whose power it might lie to do this for me, while at

the same time she had sufficient generosity and independence of mind to

enable her to respect and carry out my wishes, in spite of any possible

difference of opinion she might entertain. I was told some time

afterwards that Lüttichau had got hold of the letter and thrown it into

the fire. For the time being this painful impression helped me to the

determination to break with every one and everything, to lose all

desire to learn more of life or of art, and, even at the risk of having

to endure the greatest privations, to trust to chance and put myself

beyond the reach of everybody. The small income settled upon me by my

friends I wished to divide between myself and my wife, and with my half

go to Greece or Asia Minor, and there, Heaven alone knew how, seek to

forget and be forgotten. I communicated this plan to the only

confidante I had left to me, chiefly in order that she might be able to

enlighten my benefactors as to how I intended disposing of the income

they had offered me. She seemed pleased with the idea, and the resolve

to abandon herself to the same fate seemed to her also, in her

resentment against her position, to be quite an easy matter. She

expressed us much by hints and a word dropped here and there. Without

clearly realising what it would lead to, and without coming to any

understanding with her, I left Bordeaux towards the end of April, more

excited than soothed in spirit, and filled with regret and anxiety. I

returned to Paris, for the time being, stunned and full of uncertainty

as to what to do next. Feeling very unwell, exhausted, and at the same

time excited from want of sleep, I reached my destination and put up at

the Hotel Valois, where I remained a week, struggling to gain my

self-control and to face my strange position. Even if I had wished to

resume the plans which had been instrumental in bringing me to Paris, I

soon convinced myself that little or nothing could be done. I was

filled with distress and anger at being called upon to waste my

energies in a direction contrary to my tastes, merely to satisfy the

unreasonable demands made upon me. I was at length obliged to answer my

wife’s last pressing communication, and wrote her a long and detailed

letter in which I kindly, but at the same time frankly, retraced the

whole of our life together, and explained that I was fully determined

to set her free from any immediate participation in my fate, as I felt

quite incapable of so arranging it so as to meet with her approval. I

promised her the half of whatever means I should have at my disposal

now or in the future, and told her she must accept this arrangement

with a good grace, because the occasion had now arisen to take that

step of parting from me which, on our first meeting again in

Switzerland, she had declared herself ready to do. I ended my letter

without bidding her a final farewell. I thereupon wrote to Bordeaux

immediately to inform Jessie of the step I had taken, though my means

did not as yet allow of my forming any definite plan which I could

communicate to her for my complete flight from the world. In return she

announced that she was determined to do likewise, and asked for my

protection, under which she intended to place herself when once she had

set herself free. Much alarmed, I did all in my power to make her

realise that it was one thing for a man, placed in such a desperate

situation as myself, to cut himself adrift in the face of

insurmountable difficulties, but quite another matter for a young

woman, at least to all outward appearances, happily settled, to decide

to break up her home, for reasons which probably no one except myself

would be in a position to understand. Regarding the unconventionality

of her resolve in the eyes of the world, she assured me that it would

be carried out as quietly as possible, and that for the present she

merely thought of arranging to visit her friends the Ritters in

Dresden. I felt so upset by all this that I yielded to my craving for

retirement, and sought it at no great distance from Paris. Towards the

middle of April I went to Montmorency, of which I had heard many

agreeable accounts, and there sought a modest hiding-place. With great

difficulty I dragged myself to the outskirts of the little town, where

the country still bore a wintry aspect, and turned into the little

strip of garden belonging to a wine merchant, which was filled with

visitors only on Sundays, and there refreshed myself with some bread

and cheese and a bottle of wine. A crowd of hens surrounded me, and I

kept throwing them pieces of bread, and was touched by the

self-sacrificing abstemiousness with which the cock gave all to his

wives though I aimed particularly at him. They became bolder and

bolder, and finally flew on to the table and attacked my provisions;

the cock flew after them, and noticing that everything was topsy-turvy,

pounced upon the cheese with the eagerness of a craving long

unsatisfied. When I found myself being driven from the table by this

chaos of fluttering wings, I was filled with a gaiety to which I had

long been a stranger. I laughed heartily, and looked round for the

signboard of the inn. I thereby discovered that my host rejoiced in the

name of Homo. This seemed a hint from Fate, and I felt I must seek

shelter here at all costs. An extraordinarily small and narrow bedroom

was shown me, which I immediately engaged. Besides the bed it held a

rough table and two cane-bottomed chairs. I arranged one of these as a

washhand-stand, and on the table I placed some books, writing

materials, and the score of Lohengrin, and almost heaved a sigh of

content in spite of my extremely cramped accommodation. Though the

weather remained uncertain and the woods with their leafless trees did

not seem to offer the prospect of very enticing walks, I still felt

that here there was a possibility of my being forgotten, and being also

in my turn allowed to forget the events that had lately filled me with

Midi desperate anxiety. My old artistic instinct awoke again. I looked

over my Lohengrin score, and quickly decided to send it to Liszt and

leave it to him to bring it out as best he could. Now that I had got

rid of this score also, I felt as free as a bird and as careless as

Diogenes about what might befall me. I even invited Kietz to come and

stay with me and share the pleasures of my retreat. He did actually

come, as he had done during my stay in. Mendon; but he found me even

more modestly installed than I had been there. He was quite prepared to

take pot-luck, however, and cheerfully slept on an improvised bed,

promising to keep the world in touch with me upon his return to Paris.

I was suddenly startled from my state of complacency by the news that

my wife had come to Paris to look me up. I had an hour’s painful

struggle with myself to settle the course I should pursue, and decided

not to allow the step I had taken in regard to her to be looked upon as

an ill-considered and excusable vagary. I left Montmorency and betook

myself to Paris, summoned Kietz to my hotel, and instructed him to tell

my wife, who had already been trying to gain admittance to him, that he

knew nothing more of me except that I had left Paris. The poor fellow,

who felt as much pity for Minna as for me, was so utterly bewildered on

this occasion, that he declared that he felt as though he were the axis

upon which all the misery in the world turned. But he apparently

realised the significance and importance of my decision, as it was

necessary he should, and acquitted himself in this delicate matter with

intelligence and good feeling. That night t left Paris by train for

Clermont-Tonnerre, from whence I travelled on to Geneva, there to await

news from Frau Ritter in Dresden. My exhaustion was such that, even had

I possessed the necessary means, I could not as yet have contemplated

undergoing the fatigue of a long journey. By way of gaining time for

further developments I retired to Villeneuve, at the other end of the

Lake of Geneva, where I put up at the Hotel Byron, which was quite

empty at the time. Here I learned that Karl Ritter had arrived in

Zürich, as he said he would, with the intention of paying me a visit.

Impressing upon him the necessity for the strictest secrecy, I invited

him to join me at the Lake of Geneva, and in the second week in May we

met at the Hotel Byron. The characteristic which pleased me in him was

his absolute devotion, his quick comprehension of my position and the

necessity of my resolutions, as well as his readiness to submit without

question to all my arrangements, even where he himself was concerned.

He was full of my latest literary efforts, told me what an impression

they had made on his acquaintances, and thereby induced me to spend the

few days of rest I was enjoying in preparing my poem of Siegfried’s Tod

for publication.

I wrote a short preface dedicating this poem to my friends as a relic

of the time when I had hoped to devote myself entirely to art, and

especially to the composition of music. I sent this manuscript to Herr

Wigand in Leipzig, who returned it to me after some time with the

remark, that if I insisted on its being printed in Latin characters he

would not be able to sell a single copy of it. Later on I discovered

that he deliberately refused to pay me the ten louis d’or due to me for

Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft, which I had directed him to send to my wife.

Disappointing as all this was, I was nevertheless unable to engage in

any further work, as only a few days after Karl’s arrival the realities

of life made themselves felt in an unexpected manner, most upsetting to

my tranquillity of mind. I received a wildly excited letter from Mme.

Laussot to tell me that she had not been able to resist telling her

mother of her intentions, that in so doing she had immediately aroused

the suspicion that I was to blame, and in consequence of this her

disclosure had been communicated to M. Laussot, who vowed he would

search everywhere for me in order to put a bullet through my body. The

situation was clear enough, and I decided to go to Bordeaux immediately

in order to come to an understanding with my opponent I at once wrote

fully to M. Eugene, endeavouring to make him see matters in their true

light, but at the same time declared myself incapable of understanding

how a man could bring himself to keep a woman with him by force, when

she no longer wished to remain. I ended by informing him that I should

reach Bordeaux at, the same time as my letter, and immediately upon my

arrival there would let him know at what hotel to find me; also that I

would not tell his wife of the step I was taking, and that he could

consequently act without restraint. I did not conceal from him, what

indeed was the fact, that I was undertaking this journey under great

difficulties, as under the circumstances I considered it impossible to

wait to have my passport endorsed by the French envoy. At the same time

I wrote a few lines to Mme. Laussot, exhorting her to be calm and

self-possessed, but, true to my purpose, refrained from even hinting at

any movement on my part. (When, years afterwards, I told Liszt this

story, he declared I had acted very stupidly in not, telling Mme.

Laussot of my intentions.) I took leave of Karl the same day, in order

to set out next morning from Geneva on my tedious journey across

France. But I was so exhausted by all this that I could not help

thinking I was going to die. That same night I wrote to Frau Ritter in

Dresden, to this effect, giving her a short account of the incredible

difficulties I had been drawn into. As a matter of fact, I suffered

great inconvenience at the French frontier on account of my passport; I

was made to give my exact place of destination, and it was only upon my

assuring them that pressing family affairs required my immediate

presence, that the authorities showed exceptional leniency and allowed

me to proceed.

I travelled by Lyons through Auvergne by stage-coach for three days and

two nights, till at length I reached Bordeaux. It was the middle of

May, and as I surveyed the town from a height at early dawn I saw it

lit up by a fire that had broken out. I alighted at the Hotel Quatre

Soeurs, and at once sent a note to M. Laussot, informing him that I

held myself at his disposal and would remain in all day to receive him.

It was nine o’clock in the morning when I sent him this message. I

waited in vain for an answer, till at last, late in the afternoon, I

received a summons from the police-station to present myself

immediately. There I was first of all asked whether my passport was in

order. I acknowledged the difficulty I found myself in with regard to

it, and explained that family matters had necessitated my placing

myself in this position.

I was thereupon informed that precisely this family matter, which had

no doubt brought me there, was the cause of their having to deny me the

permission to remain in Bordeaux any longer. In answer to my question,

they did not conceal the fact that these proceedings against me were

being carried out at the express wish of the family concerned. This

extraordinary revelation immediately restored my good-humour. I asked

the police inspector whether, after such a trying journey, I might not

be allowed a couple of days’ rest before returning; this request he

readily granted, and told me that in any case there could be no chance

of my meeting the family in question, as they had left Bordeaux at

mid-day. I used these two days to recover from my fatigue, and also

wrote a letter to Jessie, in which I told her exactly what had taken

place, without concealing my contempt at the behaviour of her husband,

who could expose his wife’s honour by a denunciation to the police. I

also added that our friendship could certainly not continue until she

had released herself from so humiliating a position. The next thing was

to get this letter safely delivered. The information furnished me by

the police officials was not sufficient to enlighten me as to what had

exactly taken place in the Laussot family, whether they had left home

for some length of time or merely for a day, so I simply made up my

mind to go to their house. I rang the bell and the door sprang open;

without meeting any one I walked up to the first-floor flat, the door

of which stood open, and went from room to room till I reached Jessie’s

boudoir, where I placed my letter in her work-basket and returned the

way I had come. I received no reply, and set out upon my return journey

as soon as the term of rest granted me had expired. The fine May

weather had a cheering effect upon me, and the clear water, as well as

the agreeable name of the Dordogne, along whose banks the post-chaise

travelled for some distance, gave me great pleasure.

I was also entertained by the conversation of two fellow-travellers, a

priest and an officer, about the necessity of putting an end to the

French Republic. The priest showed himself much more humane and

broad-minded than his military interlocutor, who could only repeat the

one refrain, ‘Il faut en finir.’ I now had a look at Lyons, and in a

walk round the town tried to recall the scenes in Lamartine’s Histoire

des Girondins, where he so vividly describes the siege and surrender of

the town during the period of the Convention Nationale. At last I

arrived at Geneva, and returned to the Byron hotel, where Karl Ritter

was awaiting me. During my absence he had heard from his family, who

wrote very kindly concerning me. His mother had at once reassured him

as to my condition, and pointed out that with people suffering from

nervous disorders the idea of approaching death was a frequent symptom,

and that there was consequently no occasion to feel anxious about me.

She also announced her intention of coming to visit us in Villeneuve

with her daughter Emilie in a few days’ time. This news made me take

heart again; this devoted family, so solicitous for my welfare, seemed

sent by Providence to lead me, as I so longed to be led, to a new life.

Both ladies arrived in time to celebrate my thirty-seventh birthday on

the twenty-second of May. The mother, Frau Julie, particularly made a

deep impression upon me. I had only met her once before in Dresden,

when Karl had invited me to be present at the performance of a

quartette of his own composition, given at his mother’s house. On this

occasion the respect and devotion shown me by each member of the family

had delighted me. The mother had hardly spoken to me, but when I was

leaving she was moved to tears as she thanked me for my visit. I was

unable to understand her emotion at the time, but now when I reminded

her of it she was surprised, and explained that she had felt so touched

at my unexpected kindness to her son.

She and her daughter remained with us about a week. We sought diversion

in excursions to the beautiful Valais, but did not succeed in

dispelling Frau Ritter’s sadness of heart, caused by the knowledge of

recent events of which she had now been informed, as well as by her

anxiety at the course my life was taking. As I afterwards learned, it

had cost the nervous, delicate woman a great effort to undertake this

journey, and when I urged her to leave her house to come and settle in

Switzerland with her family, so that we might all be united, she at

last pointed out to me that in proposing what seemed to her such an

eccentric undertaking, I was counting upon a strength and energy she no

longer possessed. For the present she commended her son, whom she

wished to leave with me, to my care, and gave me the necessary means to

keep us both for the time being. Regarding the state of her fortune,

she told me that her income was limited, and now that it was impossible

to accept any help from the Laussots, she did not know how she would be

able to come to my assistance sufficiently to assure my independence.

Deeply moved, we took leave of this venerable woman at the end of a

week, and she returned to Dresden with her daughter, and I never saw

her again.

Still bent upon discovering a means of disappearing from the world, I

thought of choosing a wild mountain spot where I could retire with

Karl. For this purpose we sought the lonely Visper Thal in the canton

Valais, and not without difficulty made our way along the impracticable

roads to Zermatt. There, at the foot of the colossal and beautiful

Matterhorn, we could indeed consider ourselves cut off from the outer

world. I tried to make things as comfortable as I could in this

primitive wilderness, but discovered only too soon that Karl could not

reconcile himself to his surroundings. Even on the second day he owned

that he thought it horrid, and suggested that it would be more pleasant

in the neighbourhood of one of the lakes. We studied the map of

Switzerland, and chose Thun for our next destination. Unfortunately I

again found myself reduced to a state of extreme nervous fatigue, in

which the slightest effort produced a profuse and weakening

perspiration. Only by the greatest strength of will was I able to make

my way out of the valley; but at last we reached Thun, and with renewed

courage engaged a couple of modest but cheerful rooms looking out on to

the road, and proposed to wait and see how we should like it. In spite

of the reserve which still betrayed his shyness of character, I found

conversation with my young friend always pleasant and enlivening. I now

realised the pitch of fluent and overflowing vivacity to which the

young man could attain, particularly at night before retiring to rest,

when he would squat down beside my bed, and in the agreeable, pure

dialect of the German Baltic provinces, give free expression to

whatever had excited his interest. I was exceedingly cheered during

these days by the perusal of the Odyssey, which I had not read for so

long and which had fallen into my hands by chance. Homer’s

long-suffering hero, always homesick yet condemned to perpetual

wandering, and always valiantly overcoming all difficulties, was

strangely sympathetic to me. Suddenly the peaceful state I had scarcely

yet entered upon was disturbed by a letter which Karl received from

Mme. Laussot. He did not know whether he ought to show it to me, as he

thought Jessie had gone mad. I tore it out of his hand, and found she

had written to say that she felt obliged to let my friend know that she

had been sufficiently enlightened about me to make her drop my

acquaintance entirely. I afterwards discovered, chiefly through the

help of Frau Ritter, that in consequence of my letter and my arrival in

Bordeaux, M. Laussot, together with Mrs. Taylor, had immediately taken

Jessie to the country, intending to remain there until the news was

received of my departure, to accelerate which he had applied to the

police authorities. While they were away, and without telling her of my

letter and my journey, they had obtained a promise from the young woman

to remain quiet for a year, give up her visit to Dresden, and, above

all, to drop all correspondence with me; since, under these conditions,

she was promised her entire freedom at the end of that time, she had

thought it better to give her word. Not content with this, however, the

two conspirators had immediately set about calumniating me on all

sides, and finally to Mme. Laussot herself, saying that I was the

initiator of this plan of elopement. Mrs. Taylor had written to my wife

complaining of my intention to commit adultery, at the same time

expressing her pity for her and offering her support; the unfortunate

Minna, who now thought she had found a hitherto unsuspected reason for

my resolve to remain separated from her, wrote back complaining of me

to Mrs. Taylor. The meaning of an innocent remark I had once made had

been strangely misinterpreted, and matters wore now aggravated by

making it appear as though I had intentionally lied. In the course of

playful conversation Jessie had once told me that she belonged to no

recognised form of religion, her father Having teen a member of a

certain sect which did not baptise either according to the Protestant

or the Roman Catholic ritual; whereupon I had comforted her by assuring

her that I had come in contact with much more questionable sects, as

shortly after my marriage in Königsberg I had learned that it had been

solemnised by a hypocrite. God alone knows in what form this had been

repeated to the worthy British matron, but, at all events, she told my

wife that I had said I was ‘not legally married to her.’ In any case,

my wife’s answer to this had no doubt furnished further material with

which to poison Jessie’s mind against me, and this letter to my young

friend was the result. I must admit that, seen by this light, the

circumstance at which I felt most indignant was the way my wife had

been treated, and while I was perfectly indifferent as to what the rest

of the party thought of me, I immediately accepted Karl’s offer to go

to Zürich and see her, so as to give her the explanation necessary to

her peace of mind. While awaiting his return, I received a letter from

Liszt, telling me of the deep impression made upon him by my Lohengrin

score, which had caused him to make up his mind as to the future in

store for me. He at the same time announced that, as I had given him

the permission to do so, he intended doing all in his power to bring

about the production of my opera at the forthcoming Herder festival in

Weimar. About this time I also heard from Frau Ritter, who, in

consequence of events of which she was well aware, thought herself

called upon to beg me not to take the matter too much to heart. At this

moment Karl also returned from Zürich, and spoke with great warmth of

my wife’s attitude. Not having found me in Paris, she had pulled

herself together with remarkable energy, and in pursuance of an earlier

wish of mine, had rented a house on the lake of Zürich, installed

herself comfortably, and remained there in the hope of at last hearing

from me again. Besides this, he had much to tell me of Sulzer’s good

sense and friendliness, the latter having stood by, my wife and shown

her great sympathy. In the midst of his narrative Karl suddenly

exclaimed, ‘Ah! these could be called sensible people; but with such a

mad Englishwoman nothing could be done.’ To all this I said not a word,

but finally with a smile asked him whether he would like to go over to

Zürich? He sprang up exclaiming, ‘Yes, and as soon as possible.’ ‘You

shall have your way,’ said I; ‘let us pack. I can see no sense in

anything either here or there.’ Without breathing another syllable

about all that had happened, we left the next day for Zürich.

Audiobook Unavailable

LibriVox Database